Michele Thibodeau really wants to come home. But she can’t. It’s not because she can’t find a good paying job. (She’s got a solid tech career that lets her work remotely.) Or housing. (The Duck native boasts lots of local contacts — and two incomes to help pay rent.) The catch is she also has an infant and a toddler. And since both Thibodeau and her husband work full-time, she can’t return until she finds someone to watch the kids.
“My whole family is on the Outer Banks,” says Thibodeau, who moved to Colorado 15 years ago. “I want to raise my children there. But we’ve been hesitant to pull the trigger until we really dial in childcare. We’re on a waitlist, and we hope that something will come through so we can move back next year. We’ve run into the same issue in Denver, so it’s just something that families are navigating all over the place.”
It’s particularly problematic on the Outer Banks. Twenty years ago, there were dozens of licensed family childcare homes and centers. Today, there are seven licensed homes and 14 licensed centers. Only nine of the centers serve infants and toddlers and have no special eligibility for enrollment.
But even if you don’t have young kids, you’ve seen and felt the impacts.
As a growing number of working parents can’t find daycare or preschool programs, many must leave the workforce. For parents, this could mean ending a career you love or taking a financial hit and learning to live off a partial income. For the community, it means losing crucial employees that keep our lives and our economy running smoothly — medical staff, teachers, service industry workers, housekeepers, and first responders.
The problem is in the numbers.
According to Children and Youth Partnership for Dare County, based on July 2022 census numbers, there are 1,594 children under age five in the county but only 550 early childcare slots. These are found in licensed family childcare homes and centers. There are a number of legally operating part-day programs as well (i.e. unlicensed), but many working parents need full day care.
Meanwhile, North Carolina childcare providers earn just $12 per hour on average — while dishwashers make $15 to $20. Furthermore, the federal Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund — which provided North Carolina with a total of $3.6 billion since 2019 to address pandemic-related challenges in schools — is set to expire on September 30. Factor in population growth — from new families moving to the area in droves to local families becoming multigenerational — and the outlook only looks bleaker.
But it’s not just a problem on our little sandbar; it’s a crippling issue that impacts our entire state.
“All 100 counties in our state are considered ‘childcare deserts’,” says Susan Butler-Staub, Policy and Community Engagement Coordinator with the North Carolina Early Education Coalition. “There are not enough spots for children who need them and want them. So, it’s a pretty dire situation.”
And that just means it’s dire for all of us. For the small business owner who loses yet another full-time employee. For the restaurateur who keeps a child busy with coloring pages and crayons swiped from the host stand while their server covers a lunch shift. And especially for the toddler who spends most mornings on a tablet in the corner while their caregiver cleans cottages — instead of learning and making friends during crucial developmental years.
We asked Ms. Butler-Staub about this issue’s far-reaching ripple effect — and what we can do to help. — Hannah Bunn West
This interview took place in the summer of 2023. An edited version appeared in Outer Banks Milepost’s fall Issue 12.3
MILEPOST: North Carolina is considered a childcare desert. What does that mean?
Susan Butler-Staub: It is true that all 100 counties are considered a childcare desert in our state, meaning that there are not enough spots for children who need them and want them. So it’s a pretty dire situation. There are more than five children competing for every available licensed childcare slot in the state and that’s a really high number. In a lot of areas, that number might be higher because that’s just an average.
The Children and Youth Partnership for Dare County estimated that it’s more like eight families competing for each slot in our area.
In a lot of places it can even be 10-15 children competing for one licensed spot. People are having to think about how do you get on a waitlist before you even know you’re pregnant? I was working with a teacher in Charlotte, touring a childcare program’s infant room and there were three empty cribs. They said, ‘Oh, those are for the children that haven’t been born yet.’ The parents had gotten off the waitlist while they were still pregnant and were paying tuition to hold the spots months in advance for their unborn children.Given the cost of tuition, it shows you how desperate parents are in this childcare desert. That’s what the competition looks like.
It seems everyone has a waitlist, sometimes years long. What factors are contributing to these endless waitlists?
Across the whole state, regardless of urban counties or rural counties, we find that access to childcare slots can take between months and years to become available, particularly for infant and toddler slots. Those are the hardest to come by. So the Outer Banks is not alone in having wait lists that are over a year long.
A lot of it has to do with the staffing crisis, but not all of it. Some of it has to do with the fact that there are just not enough childcare slots or facilities for the number of children who need them. But also, because we don’t have enough teachers, you will sometimes see empty classrooms that we aren’t able to staff, so we can’t open those classrooms to serve children. That also results in a waiting list.
What are some of the barriers for teachers and childcare workers? What do you think is contributing to the loss of people in that industry?
Working in childcare is a really demanding job. When we think about the crisis we’re in right now, it’s due to a number of different converging issues. The primary issue, the biggest one that has been going on since I’ve been in the field for over 20 years now, is that folks who work in childcare are chronically underpaid. They are not paid anywhere near what they’re worth. Almost half of childcare providers are on some sort of public assistance because of how little they are paid, most don’t have any sort of health or retirement benefits, yet they’re doing work that requires a high level of knowledge and skill.
There’s so much that goes into it, and they’re getting paid $12 an hour. It’s an unsustainable situation. For a lot of providers, they may have the passion for it, they may really want to stay in it, but because they have their own families and their own lives that they have to support and sustain they can’t financially make that commitment. And it didn’t help that during Covid, places like Target and Starbucks started paying between $15-$25 per hour. We started losing a lot of folks to that.
And then there’s the issue of affordability for families. Dare County’s Child Day Care Assistance Program helps pay for childcare, but those eligible can’t even submit an application unless they are able to list a licensed childcare provider with a vacancy…
You can’t access the funding and use it because you can’t secure a slot in the right time frame. It’s a real catch 22. It’s an unintended consequence when policies like that are set up for these types of services. It makes sense when setting up the service that you would want to make sure that a child has a slot before giving out money. But it’s important to understand the context of our communities and what they look like right now–childcare slots are hard to come by. So how can we make these programs work so that families can have real access to them?
What are the alternatives as a parent? Either quit your job to stay home with children or send them somewhere you don’t feel great about?
That’s what it comes down to for a lot of people. We know for parents who choose to or need to stay in the workforce, those early years are the most critical for finding that high quality care. You know, that place where we feel comfortable leaving our children, where we feel like our children are safe and cared for so that we can leave them with confidence and go back to the workforce and be engaged in what we’re doing.
State and federal relief that got us through the pandemic comes to an end as this year closes out.** How might that worsen the situation?
The biggest thing we’re working on now is the funding cliffs that we’re facing at the end of the year. We’re waiting for the state budget to come out and really continuing to advocate for $300 million to be in that budget to support the continuation of the stabilization grants. Those really provided childcare programs across the state with the ability to increase staff pay, to provide bonuses, to provide benefits. Something like eight out of 10 of the programs who received them said that they won’t be able to maintain those raises or bonuses once that funding goes. And so, if we have eight out of 10 programs taking away the raises from their teachers, we expect that that will have a pretty significant effect on staffing in the field which will then turn into increased issues with access.
We’re really hoping to see that money in the budget, or at least some of that money in the budget, so that we’re able to buy ourselves some time to explore additional policy options. If we can continue that compensation for early childhood teachers, then we can work together with advocates and legislators to continue some discussions around additional supports for the workforce. One big one would be increasing childcare subsidy rates, so that providers are paid more per child who receive childcare subsidy, so that they’re then better able to pay their teachers. Also looking at other innovative ways to bring money to kind of fix the childcare financing system because, fundamentally, that system is broken.
We need to look at creative policy levers to fix the childcare financing system in our state, and also to advocate at the federal level to try to get Congress to send money down the pipeline, because it’s not just a North Carolina issue. Pretty much every other state is in the same boat, fighting for the same things and working on the same issues. Continuing to advocate at the federal level in hopes that we can get some federal legislation that will bolster the childcare industry as well.
Is there room for individual counties to step in in regards to funding?
That’s something we’ve seen a lot more of in recent years–counties coming up with creative solutions that really fit their community’s needs. Counties are starting to think about it in terms of economic development. As advocates are speaking up on the issue, they’re starting to realize that everything is linked to child care: If people want jobs, they have to have childcare. If people want to go back to school, they have to have childcare. If we want to bring in new business, we have to have a strong childcare structure–all of it is linked to this service. That’s really spurred a lot of these new conversations because for a long time it was overlooked.
This is not something that’s fixed at the national level yet. A lot of folks are saying, ‘we’ve got to fix it for ourselves, we’ve got to figure out what we need in our area.’ It will take counties thinking creatively, looking at the childcare needs in their communities, and looking at what resources are available to do something that maybe hasn’t been done before. These are the steps a community would need to take in order to move the needle.”
While everything is in the works, what can we as individuals do to help in our own communities?
A lot of people just don’t talk about childcare, so many people don’t know that it’s an issue. Unless you’ve had a child that needed childcare, you don’t understand the impact of it and the ins and outs of it. We’re always telling folks just to talk about it as much as possible because the biggest part of advocacy is public awareness. Whenever you see people that have any sort of power within the community–at church, or in the grocery store, at the mechanic–talk about childcare with them. Talk about the struggles that you’re facing and share your experiences. Continue to have those conversations locally so that when you speak at those county commissioner meetings people aren’t surprised anymore but instead say, ‘What do we need to do about it? What are the next steps?’
_________________________________________________
Swells’a Brewing always knew they wanted to do more than just sell beer. They also wanted to make a lasting difference for their Outer Banks community. That’s why they joined “1% for the Planet,” a program that allows businesses to kick back a portion of profits to an environmental cause. Last year, the KDH brewery had a check ready for $11,550. The only question? Who to make it out to.
“We wanted to support our national parks, because we feel they’re the last places on the Outer Banks that keep everything natural and remind people of why we live here,” says co-founder Sam Harriss. “And Outer Banks Forever provides the mechanism to help them more directly.”
Launched in 2019, Outer Banks Forever is the official non-profit partner of NPS’s Outer Banks Group. Often called “friends groups,” at least half of America’s 422 national parks has one to help perform myriad tasks. Some handle educational tours and run volunteer groups. Others simply promote educational awareness. Nearly all perform one primary function.
“Most friends groups do some form of fundraising,” says Outer Banks Group’s director, Jessica Barnes. “National Parks can’t ask for donations— if they need funding for a specific project, they can’t go to the public or to a foundation or to a business and ask for money.”
But Outer Banks Forever can. And they do, tapping everyone from weekend visitors to longtime local businesses to sneaky federal grant programs. Furthermore, they often find ways to get around red tape that bogs down most government bureaucracies, helping make improvements that might otherwise take years, whether it’s installing the first hand-capable kayak launch on Hatteras Island or adding a mile of multiuse path to a busy Buxton thoroughfare.
“Our Pathways to Your National Parks campaign will connect Route 12 to the Old Lighthouse Beach site and to the current Lighthouse,” says Barnes. “That project has been on the park’s wish list since 1984. And they just didn’t have funding or the capacity to be able to make it happen. And this year, we are going to be giving the parks about $400,000 for the Pathways Project and several other smaller projects.”
We asked Barnes to better explain how friends groups work and — more importantly — why folks should help.—Matt Walker
This interview took place in April of 2023. An edited version appears in Outer Banks Milepost Issue 12.2.
OUTER BANKS MILEPOST: So what’s your background? And how did you get what sort of got you into this field? I guess.
JESSICA BARNES: Yeah. So I have been working in the nonprofit sector pretty much since I got out of college, back in 2006. So I started learning kind of fundraising and nonprofit marketing, volunteer management, with a breast cancer organization in Richmond, Virginia, and then just sort of have grown my career since then. I did move out to San Diego for a few years, I got my master’s in nonprofit management and leadership from the University of San Diego, and then was looking to move back to the East Coast. I’m originally from the Richmond area, Mechanicsville, Virginia, to be exact. And when I was looking to move back, that was about 2015, I came across a job posting at the Shenandoah National Park Trust. And that was my first foray into nonprofits that support national parks, I didn’t really know that that was a thing. So I started as the Director of Development at Shenandoah, which is based in Charlottesville. I was there for about four years, and then this position came up.
So we are actually part of a larger nonprofit that’s called Eastern National. And Eastern National, they are actually a retail nonprofit. They run bookstores in national parks around the country, along the east coast and Midwest primarily. And they have been running the bookstores here on the Outer Banks and all three of those national parks here for many, many years. So they had a good relationship with the Park Service here. And there was no true dedicated fundraising partner — or friends group is sometimes what they’re called — here on the Outer Banks raising funds for all three of the national parks. And so they decided to create Outer Banks Forever, and kind of launched it as their first philanthropic friends group. And they hired me as the executive director.
So I moved down here to the Outer Banks at the end of 2018. And at that time, it was very new; we were really launching this thing from scratch. And so we launched to the public in April of 2019, during National Park Week. So National Park Week is always at the end of April, right around Earth Day.
So that’s what brought me here. But I’ve been in the nonprofit sector, like I said, for many years now, primarily doing fundraising and marketing and volunteer management and program management as well. I loved working alongside the National Park Service in my position at Shenandoah, and learning how philanthropy can support parks, and sort of fill the gap, I think our national parks are, they’re such an important part of my life, I’ve been going to national parks all my life. And that federal funding, you know, doesn’t necessarily keep pace with visitation. Particularly the past, I would say, five to 10 years, our national parks have seen huge increases across the country, in visitation and people exploring and learning about our national parks. But just because we have more visitors doesn’t mean that the parks to get more money, unfortunately. And so that’s kind of one of the roles that Outer Banks Forever is here to play. It’s just kind of filling that gap and helping our parks kind of adapt to new challenges.
That’s cool. I told you before that when I first interviewed Superintendent Hallac, that was one of his missions was to get a friends group because they do exist. They have existed in other parks and capacity for a while, right?
Yeah. I think there’s somewhere around 422 units of the National Park Service around the country. And I would say at this point close to half of them have some sort of Friends Group. Some are small, not well established; and some that have been around for a long time. I know that friends of Acadia up in Maine is a good example of one that’s been around a long time.
But even here in North Carolina, Friends of the Smokies — Great Smoky Mountains National Park — is a friends group that’s been around is very well established. They raise lots of money for the Smokies. Blue Ridge Parkway foundation is another one that’s based in North Carolina that’s been around for a long time and much more established, obviously, than we are. So we while we did start this from scratch, we are part of this bigger network that, you know, gets together every year for a conference and learns from each other and shares resources and things like that. So I have counterparts at national parks, like I said, Smokies certainly, Blue Ridge Parkway the closest, but you know, as far away as the Grand Canyon that I can call up and ask questions and learn from and see how they’re working with their parks and how they’re getting projects done and things like that. So we have a pretty good, strong network of sharing within our kind of friends community.
I guess most people, they just figure it’s a federal park, it’s already funded. Can you speak a little bit about what sort of shortfalls are really are? What’s the reality in terms of funding versus, you know, what they get versus what, what they need? Specifically with the Outer Banks Group?
Yeah, what’s interesting is, like I said, we’ve seen a big increase in visitation at all national parks. But certainly here in the Outer Banks, over the last five years, we’ve seen, you know, huge jumps in visitation for the parks. And like I said, the way that their budgets are structured — their federal budget — it’s not necessarily based on increasing for that. So what ends up happening is the parks, for the most part, they are getting, their budgets have been fairly steady over the past decade with, you know, some small increases for cost of living and things like that. But really, what ends up happening is there are more visitors using the resources and visiting the parks, but they’re having to manage those increase in visitors with the same amount of funding year over year. And that’s just a challenge when you have, you know, sometimes several hundred thousand more visitors at a park, but they don’t have more staff to manage that. And that’s everything from mowing the grass to cleaning the bathrooms to, you know, giving programs in the park.
So that’s a challenge. And one of the roles that we play is not only just sort of helping to fill the gaps, where, you know, they don’t have enough funding for a particular project or something that is really important, you know, enhancement to the parks. But also as a friends group, what we can do is we can help them access other pots of federal funding, that they can only get to if they can provide a private match. So our organization is facilitating a public-private partnership with the federal government. And so sometimes there are other pots of funding — large and small — that our parks can get access to, as long as we can provide a private match. And private can be from individuals and families, business sponsors, foundations, things like that.
And I think it is important to note, we do have one fee park here. So Wright Brothers does have a fee to get in. And that is great for a park because that is a revenue source that is tied to visitation. So more people come into the park, more people pay to come into the park, that’s more funding that they have. The challenge, though — even with a park that has a fee — is that those funds are restricted. So the park can only use them for certain things. So it’s not like they get an increase in funding and they can use it for whatever the park needs. There are specific guidelines around what those funds can be used for. So that’s one sort of distinction to think about.
And then we have here on the Outer Banks, two parks that don’t have fees. So Cape Hatteras National Seashore — first National Seashore in the country completely free to visit there. You know, there’s no entrance fee, I guess you would want to say people have to pay to stay there. Of course. Same thing with Fort Raleigh, no entrance fee. And they do have other revenue sources. For example, Cape Hatteras specifically has the off road vehicle permit process, where if you want to drive on the beach, in Cape Hatteras, you have to have a permit. That is, again, a revenue source and more permits equals more revenue. But again, that revenue is restricted. So really, those funds are used to manage that program. And I think here on the Outer Banks, when it comes to particularly that program, beach driving, it’s a natural part of our culture here but it’s this is actually something very unique to beach community to be able to drive on the beach. So the funds from that program go to support that program and to help offset the cost of managing that. So again, we get to play kind of a unique role in helping the park just fill those gaps. And I think it’s even more important now, because we are seeing such a big increase in visitation but not seeing the same comparable increase in their federal budget.
And what were you saying before? The problem is you can’t I couldn’t donate to a park, if I wanted to correct? so you guys serve the role to be able to take donations. Not only can you free of how this money is used, you can actually solicit money to be donated. Do have that correct? So why can’t I just donate to the park directly?
Yes, sort of. So you can, if you wanted to walk up to the park and give a donation, you technically can do that. It’s just harder on the park side. Number one, they can’t ask for donations. So we’re the only ones that can ask for donations. So if they needed funding for a specific project, they can’t go to the public or to a foundation or to a business and ask for money. They can accept the money, but it is harder on their end, to then restrict that money to specific projects. So that’s where we come in: is number one, we can do the actual fundraising and the asking for the money. But it’s also much easier for us to say, you know, we’re doing this specific project. And a donor comes along and says this is exactly what I wanted to go to. And we can help them sort of facilitate that restriction on their end; it’s just a little bit more difficult because they’re a federal agency.
Gotcha. So basically, not only can you ask for money, you can actually come up with ideas that you think are worth implementing, and you can get around some of the red tape, and then help implement it.
Yeah, exactly. Right now, a lot of the support that we’re providing is either funding support, or volunteer support, or really marketing support —you know, telling the stories of our parks and getting people interested in all the different aspects of our parks, because that’s not really what the Park Service does. But in the future, one of the things we could be able to do is actually manage some of the projects. So that’s also what tends to happen in parks — particularly if they’re struggling to staff, their parks, like a lot of other businesses are. So, sometimes it’s not always about the money, it’s about having themanpower to manage a project to get it complete. And so that’s another role that our friends group will probably play in the future: getting sort of actual project management support to get things done.
And by that, I mean, like volunteers and things like that, or do you mean like hiring people to do the job?
Yeah, like actually contracting the work. And again, we have all kinds of agreements with the park service, and rules that we have to work within. But, for example, if we were doing a construction project, and we could do the contracting separately from the Park Service, then that gives them a little bit of leeway in how we how quickly we can get those projects done. If you don’t have to go through a process.
Because they’re basically strapped, too. They’ve got a bunch of stuff going on. So you can take a lot of weight off of. And they’re strapped not just for funding, they’re strapped for time, they’re strapped for all this stuff. You guys can come along and say, “Alright, this is something that we want that — that public says will make a great idea for this park — let us help implement it, and we’ll connect them in it from finding the funding to do even contracting the work.” It sounds like.
Yeah, we’re not quite there yet. But that is kind of one of the long term goals that provide that kind of support.
And is it safe to say is that this is basically how all friends groups operate? I mean, is that kind of like their mission statement for a friends group in general? Is just to take on these jobs and concerns that the park either can’t do? Or because they’re not allowed to or it just doesn’t have the time or resources to?
Yeah, I mean, I would say on a basic level, yes, that’s kind of the goal of what most of the friends groups are doing or providing. It really it depends, per park, almost all friends groups are doing some form of fundraising. And then they provide varying levels of support based on their park’s needs. So that’s what’s kind of unique about it; they get to sort of adapt their operations and what they work on and their mission based on what their parks need. So I know some — particularly urban parks — that have really strong, in-depth volunteer programs, and the friends group actually manages the whole volunteer program for them. You know, a lot of friends groups give actual education programming, so instead of the park having to hire seasonal staff to give ranger programs or give tours or things like that, the friends group has staff that can actually do that on their own as part of their agreement with their parks.
So the type of support I think, varies by friends group, but the basic goal is that we’re all here to just protect and enhance our national parks in any way that they need. And it is pretty unique here on the Outer Banks, for our size committee to have three significant national parks that have national significance — not only in their stories, but Cape Hatteras is up there among some of the highest visitation parks.. And so I was really excited personally, to see this organization come to fruition. And like you said, I know Superintendent Hallac has been a huge support. I’ve worked very closely with him and his team, as we’ve been getting this thing off the ground.
Do you guys lobby at all? Do you do any political activism in defense of the parks in any way, shape? Or form? Is that, uh, is that separate?
So we can do advocacy on behalf of the parks. So just be there to educate state legislators and federal legislators, about issues concerning our parks, talk to them about potential funding for Park projects —we certainly can do that. We don’t do lobbying, per se. But like I said, more of an advocacy education role, that is something that we definitely are kind of dipping our toes in right now.
That’s interesting. For sure day on day, hopefully Dave’s forgotten this, but the first time I ever spoke with Max he was as on a group call, he’s introducing everything. This was when I was doing a lot of work with Surfrider and offshore drilling issue was heating up pretty heavy and, and I asked him to take on that, and he gave a really nuanced answer. You know, I kind of stuck it to a little bit. But you know, is defense, the DOI makes these decisions, and that’s the park service’s boss. So in a situation like that, could a friends group be more vociferously opposed? At the same time the park might be a little more, you know, pragmatic.
I would say yes, and no. So the way that I like to approach our work is that we want to be a true partner to the park. So I am not going to go and say anything that’s going to somehow reflect badly on our park or isn’t aligned with what they sort of their messaging or their mission. At the same time, we do have a little bit more freedom to say things that they maybe would not feel comfortable saying, because they are a part of the federal government. So yes, and no. So before I go to any sort of, you know, advocacy, meeting, or just even thinking along an advocate line, I always talk to the park to make sure that we’re aligning our message and our priorities with their message and their priorities, because I just, I feel like that’s what a true partnership is. And that’s what we want our work to be with the park,
I thought was another interesting you said earlier, like, the public private partnership. Can you go into that a little bit more? It’s such a buzzword. It seems like, in a world where people are leery of ‘handouts’ for lack of a better term, public private partnership seems to be a great way of going about it. Can you give a little more detail on that, and how that how that works?
Yeah. And that really goes back to sort of the origins of philanthropy and the national parks. So if I remember correctly, I think it was actually at Acadia National Park. They were one of the first parks that received a donation of land to actually start their park. And so that really kicked off what is public private partnership and philanthropy look like for national parks, and that was well in the early 1900s. But, yeah, I think that’s really the basis of what these friends groups are made to do is to be able to provide the public — and even, you know, private foundations, private businesses — the ability to support these places that are very special to them. So you know, I think for me, when I think about our national parks, they’re providing such an amazing experience here on the Outer Banks. And having Cape Hatteras National Seashore have 70 miles of protected beaches, is I think a big part of why our community is so special and why it’s different than other East Coast beach communities, right? So we’re not Virginia Beach, we’re not Myrtle Beach. And that’s partly because we have a National Seashore that’s protecting our land here. And so I think people know that, and understand that, and have a deep connection to these places, and the experiences and memories that they’ve made here. And they want to be able to support them.
And like I said, the park on its own, while certainly you could walk up and give a donation, it’s not as effective as having a friends group that can be out there really focusing on projects, really getting different types of stories and messaging out and engaging the public in a different way that the park just doesn’t have the capacity to do. So I think that’s kind of the basis of why we’re here, right? Is that public private partnership. And they’re a federal agency, but their federal budget is just sort of the baseline of funding that they can get. There’s other federal funds out there. And those pots of money are built for that public private partnership to encourage that.
And so that’s a role that we can play; we can bring a match that allows them to get more federal funding. So are not here to replace their budget, right? That’s never going to be our role. It’s really just to fill some gaps and to allow them to access additional funds when they need it.
Can you give me some examples, then? I mean, of stuff that you’ve had going on? People and groups you’ve worked with? And can you sort of break down more success stories?
Yeah, so I think the biggest sort of partnership project that we’ve been working on is our Pathways to Your National Parks campaign. And the first part of that we kicked off last year, and that is to help build a new multi-use path at the Cape Hatteras lighthouse. So that will connect route 12, to the Old Lighthouse Beach site and to the current Lighthouse with a little over a mile of paved multi-use path. And what’s really interesting to me, when I when I talk to the park staff is that is a project that has been on the books somewhere, sort of on their wish list, since 1984, I believe. And they just didn’t have funding, they didn’t have capacity — all of these things – to be able to make that project really happen. And so it was one of the first projects that we started talking to them about when we founded and launch Outer Banks forever, in 2019. But you know, we were still a new organization. And it was a pretty big project. And so we were like, “Okay, let’s keep this in mind. But we need to build sort of our base of donate up donors and support.”
So when we started to really kick that project off, in 2021, one of the first donations that we got was from Cape Hatteras Electric Co Op. They are, as of right now our top private donor. They gave a $30,000 donation to specifically get the construction design started for this project. So that was a huge, partnership. And the Cape Hatteras Electric Co Op couldn’t give that money to the parks, but they could give it to us. So sometimes there are restrictions on the funder side of who can actually give to the National Park Service, and we can play that facilitator/mediator role. So they gave the donation to us, and then we gave it to the park for that project.
Same thing our next biggest business donor is Real Watersports. They have been giving consistently since the beginning. Trip Foreman is one of our founding board members. He’s currently our board president. And obviously their business is based in the Seashore. So without the National Seashore, their business would look very different. And so he and his team have felt just really strongly that they want to support the park and support projects like this pathway.
So those are kind of our two biggest donors. Like I said, we have a great partnership with Swells’a Brewing. They’re doing, they signed up for the 1% for the Planet program, which is a really great program. It’s a global program, any business around the world can sign up. And basically they dedicate 1% of their sales each year to an environmental organization. So we had already started working with Swells’a, we were doing our Pints for Pa”rks events. And then they decided, You know what, we want to kind of double down on this and go for this 1% for the Planet partnership. And so they signed up for that. And they just gave us a donation of just over $11,000,which is really exciting.
What a great way to help! Just drink a beer!
Exactly. Those are kind about some of our big funders. We did also receive a $25,000 capacity building grant from the National Park Foundation. So the National Park Foundation is sort of the official philanthropic partner of the National Park Service as a whole. And they have a variety of different grant programs that we’ve benefited from. But one of the biggest was a grant that actually allowed me to bring on a part time staff person, who now is full time, but just kind of given us that boost up. So National Park Foundation was a big supporter. And then just a couple others: so Carolina brewery, we have a great partnership with them. Robert Poitras has lived here off and on throughout the years, he is on our board, they gave a great donation to the Pathways Project. Even before that Ocean Atlantic Rentals and Towne Nank teamed up to help us do our very first projects back in 2020, which was creating a mobility-friendly kayak launch at Oregon inlet. So it was actually the first dedicated kayak launch in Cape Hatteras National Seashore. They didn’t have any dedicated kayak launches, until we partnered with Ocean Atlantic and Towne Bank to get that done. So we’ve had a really good outpouring of support from local businesses. But really our a lot of our fundraising comes from individuals and families. So that’s what we mostly focus on. We do have a good local donor base, but mostly visitors and second homeowners who are just really passionate about the parks, and love what the parks provide, as far as both protecting resources and telling historical stories. So that’s kind of really our bread and butter with individuals who have this great connection to this place and our parks here and want to get back to him.
Do you know how much money you’ve raised since you started?
I can give you an estimate for sure. Let’s see… actually, this might more accurate, better number to give people some perspective. This year, we are going to be giving the parks about $400,000 for the Pathways Project and several other smaller projects.
That’s amazing. And so tell me more about those projects. And you already mentioned the kayak, one you talked about the path was where we were where were we in the process and the pathways, and then they said, You were done with the fundraising side, you’re under the implementation or what’s the sort of chronology?
Yeah, so for the Buxton pathway we are, we’re just kind of wrapping up the final push for the fundraising campaign right now. So April, in May, will be kind of where we wrap that up. So just last month, we got to review the 65% complete construction drawings from the contractor. We did a walkthrough, made a few edits, put some comments back to them. So we are expecting to get the final design drawings in the next month or so for final review. And then the goal right now is to have the fundraising campaign and the design finished in May, so that they the park can then go to contracting in June. It is quite a lengthy contracting process. And you know, anything construction related these days takes a little longer. But our goal right now is that they will start construction in early 2024.
So you got that and the kayak, and what other projects you’ve completed? And what’s the what’s on the done deck?
Yeah, so I’ll start with the ones that we’ve completed. And I’ll tell you a little bit about some of the things coming down the pipeline. So last year at Fort Raleigh, the volunteers to came to the park staff and came to us and said, ‘We would love to put in an education garden right beside the visitor center that talks about the importance of agriculture on Roanoke Island specifically for the Native Americans that lived there, the English colonists when they first came to settle, as well as the Freedmen’s Colony which was formerly enslaved of families who lived on Roanoke Island after the Civil War.” So they wanted to have three part-education garden. And we said, “Yes, absolutely.” And it’s this, you know, really new, fun, unique way to tell that story. So we completed that last year, they got a couple more things they’re gonna add to it this year. But that was a really fun project.
We also we partnered with the Outer Banks Visitor’s Bureau and Surfline, and we helped put a webcam up on the Cape Hatteras Lighthouse, so people can see the view from the lighthouse wherever they are. And that was pretty exciting. That project is really a three part project. We are going to hopefully put one at Wright Brothers, we’re working on that right now, to have a webcam up on top of the monument. So you could kind of get that beautiful view from up on top of the monument. And then there will be one at Fort Raleigh, as well, that will look out on the sound. So those have been really fun.
The ones that we have coming up, we are working on an artist and community project with the parks. So national parks — particularly the larger national parks around the country — many of them have artists residency programs, where both local and national artists can come and do their whatever medium their artwork is, in the park sort of be inspired by our national parks. And we didn’t have that here. But we know that we have a very vibrant local arts community here. And I think you’d be hard pressed to walk into any art gallery and not see at least one of our lighthouses. So this artisan community event that we’re going to have on Earth Day, which is April 22, will kick off what we hope will grow into a true artists residency program where we’ll be able to help support those local and potentially national artists in the future, who are inspired by our national parks.
We also working on a new Freedom Trail for Fort Raleigh. This will be a new education trail for people to experience it specifically talks about the Freedmen’s colony. So I think Fort Raleigh, it’s best known as the site of the Lost Colony. But the Freedmen’s colony, like I said, was a community of formerly enslaved families who came to Roanoke Island after the Civil War and had a community there for a couple of years. And so this New Freedom Trail is really going to expand on that story. Some, you know, again, it’s one of the stories that I feel like most people don’t know about Fort Raleigh. So we’re really happy to be supporting that.
And then, over the next couple of years, we’re going to be working pretty extensively on a couple projects at Wright Brothers National Memorial. So back in 2019, the Park Service, worked with the community and they redid their general management plan, which is basically the strategic plan for Wright brothers that said, “Here’s kind of what we have, here’s sort of what we’d like to see in the future.” And we’re in kind of the early discussions of how we might be able to help them with a couple of the bigger projects, which include a new education building. So right now, the Rangers give programs, particularly to school groups, either inside the visitor center, which can be a little bit of a challenge, or outside under a temporary tent. And as the site of the first flight, and with the Wright Brothers story being such an integral part of the history of the Outer Banks, we’d love to see a true education building where they could do larger school groups, and have weather-protected ways to give the public different education programs. So the education building will be a big one. And then we are going to put a new multi-use path around the property at Wright Brothers, which again, will just be a new way for people to experience. Right now, there are some sidewalks that are kind of connected. But we really want people to get a full view of the entire property at Wright Brothers and be able to have a new way to experience it. So we will be working on a multi-use path there as well.
That’s crazy. And so what percentage of these different projects would have been funded if you guys didn’t exist?
I think, these types of projects get funded down the line; it’s just sometimes can take a lot longer if they don’t have a group like us to find the additional funding that they need. So when we think about, for example, the pathway down in Buxton, the park was able to get a $1.3 million grant from the Federal Highways Commission. Then there was just a little bit of gap in the funding, which is where we stepped in to sort of fill that gap and raise about $350,000 for that project to get us to the finish line. But I would say most of these projects would be on a long list that the park and the community would love to see. And the park would be able to maybe get one or two of them don’t a year, particularly with the smaller projects, but for some of these larger projects, I think we can just accelerate both the timeline and just sort of the feasibility of actually making them happen.
Not just from a financial standpoint, but also because you’re dedicated to that one, cause you’re not split up with whatever else the park service has to juggle. And then I guess any long term goals? Like fundraising numbers and the like?
Yeah, I think it’s, again, it’s gonna depend as we prioritize projects with the parks, but I feel like our long term goal is really to be providing sustainable financial support to meet the park’s greatest needs and help them adapt to new challenges and new opportunities that come along. I think that’s one of the things that is just hard for parks because, like you said, there they are concerned about capacity, how many people that they have to be able to manage the parks, and really the day to day operations/ Sometimes they don’t have the opportunity to say, “Okay, what else is coming, you know, coming down in the future? And how can we help?” So, really, that’s kind of my goal, I don’t necessarily have a concrete fundraising goal, because I think it will just depend on which projects we make a priority each year. But, really, it’s just to provide that sustainable financial support, to meet the parks’ greatest needs, and help them adapt. Because I think we live in a very unique community, we live on barrier islands. So there’s lots of things that we have to adapt to here. And like I said, I think that’s one of the things we’ve been able to do as far as the increased visitation, is giving people new ways to experience the parks, to learn about the parks, and then also to be able to give back, because like I said, I think people feel very connected to this place, and they want to support it and make sure that future generations of their own family and others can come here and have those same experiences. And that’s what we’re here to help facilitate.
So how do people help? How does the fundraising work? And when you say you’re getting missive mostly from visitors and whatnot? Is it are there like boxes placed around? Is it? Is it a membership, like what sort of the way it’s people can actually help?
Yeah, so we, we do have at least one electronic donation box that’s set up inside the Visitor Center at Wright brothers. But primarily, we started by just building an email list, so folks can sign up for our email list, and once a month, we kind of send out an update with some interesting stories and behind-the-scenes looks at the parts. And that’s where we’ve gotten most of our donations. We also do mailed newsletter. So folks prefer, you know, kind of print something to read. We do that twice a year. And that’s where we get donations as well. So, if people are interested, going to our website is the first place to start. We’ve got lots of great information there about upcoming events, like I said, behind the scenes, stories, things that they may not know about their national parks, we’ve got articles there that they can check out. And then I think signing up for our email list is really the best way to stay in touch about the projects, specifically, and be able to donate.
And one of the great things I think about what we’re able to do, is we can do donor recognition in our parks. So that’s something that we, as their official philanthropic partner, are allowed to do. So for example, with the pathways campaign, once you get to the once the project is complete, there’ll be a donor wall there – you know, just small —but it’ll recognize the folks that have given to that project. So we’ll be doing more of that, depending on what the project is and where it’s at.
So, a Trip Forman Tribute Footpath? Is that what we’re talking about?
[laughs] Yeah. Yeah, exactly. He would love to face right in the cement. No, we do have rules around what we can do as far as getting recognition, but like I said, donor walls and different ways that we can recognize folks in the parks is very important. Oh, and another project that might be of interest is the park has been working with the First Flight High School to actually launch a new class where the kids will build an FAA approved airplane. So they’re gonna build an airplane at Wright Brothers. So we are working to get some funding right now to help them launch that program. So that’s a kind of exciting one it’s coming down the pike.
That’s cool. Do you guys have a volunteer element? Or are you guys more funding? I know, the park service might be, whatever, picking up a house off the beach. But if there was, would you do any rallying the troops?
We do help with volunteer support. It’s something that we’re still kind of growing our how we’re helping the park with that. But we do have a volunteer list that folks can sign up for on our website. And we let them know about either special events that we might need volunteers for. Beach cleanups, obviously, are a big thing, whether there’s a house fallen or not, there’s still, something to be cleaned up almost everywhere. So we are working with the park to kind of expand what we can do as far as volunteer support.
I will say probably, it’s about a 50/50 split our volunteer list and whether they’re locals or their visitors. and we do get quite a few requests from people who just say, ‘Hey, my family is in town next week, on vacation, is there anything that I can do to help the parks?” So we’re trying to help the park find opportunities for visitors to engage in a volunteer capacity. And one thing I’m really excited about — this goes back to our biggest donors – one that I don’t want to leave off when we’re talking about the pathways campaign is the Outer Banks Visitor’s Bureau. So we did get two significant grants from them for projects this year. So one for the Pathways Project in Buxton, and then another for restoring a historic signal tower at the Weather Bureau Sation in Hatteras Village. So the Visitors Bureau has been a great supporter of ours. Definitely one of our biggest donors. But also one of the things that they’re doing right now, is they have a new voluntourism initiatives. So they’re really trying to help visitors connect to nonprofits, not just us, but nonprofits generally in the Outer Banks. And so we’re pretty excited about that, to see how we might be able to work with the Visitors Bureau on getting visitors more engaged as well.
Cool. And how about I mean, what are the limits? Right? So let’s say, let’s say, I’ve got tons of dough. And I think is a great idea for I don’t know, let’s call it a Lanai at the Lighthouse, so people can find shade between surfs. Can I just roll in there and be like, ‘I want to do this’ and fund it? Or is there some sort of process? Or how does that work?
Yeah, it’s definitely a process. Like I siad, earlier, we work very closely with the Park Service. And so they certainly want to hear ideas from people in the community people, both locally and visitors, of what they’d love to see in their parks. But they also have to prioritize what’s realistic, and what’s going to be usd most widely used by all of our visitors and what still protects the resource. So we work very closely with them. And each year, we have sort of a list of priority projects that they sort of already had on their docket, and that we can we think we can support. So that’s kind of how we work that, but like I said, we do certainly take suggestions. But it would certainly not be a thing where a donor comes and says, “Yeah, here’s exactly what I want. And here’s the money for it, you need to make it happen.” We have to work very closely with them, because a lot of times they are the ones implementing this project. So like I said, they love to hear feedback from the community about what they want to see in their parks. But we really do work side by side, and making sure that the projects that we’re raising funds for our highest priority projects for each park.
But, conversely, like let’s say, let’s say the Wright Brothers runway needed to be replaced or needed some sort of gear you could – the park can’t do this — but you could go to a Boeing or Delta and say, ‘Hey, guys, we need this. Would you be interested in funding?’
Yes. Exactly. So that is certainly something that’s on our radar to do.
And it’s safe to say you’re gonna need more help moving forward no matter what, right? I mean, it’s just the work is never done, and assume you’re always gonna need more dough for whatever might be on the list.
Yeah, exactly. And like I said, we have several smaller scale projects that are you know, maybe the $10,000 to $20,000 range. And, but like I said, some of these projects are much bigger. An education building, a new multi-use path, sometimes those are, you know, multimillion dollar projects. And again, we’re not going to be funding them completely. But we work with the park to find federal funding sources, and then the funds that we raise to match that. And that’s been kind of our model. And that’s what we’ll do going forward. But yeah, I mean, the parks, as, as you know, I mean, like I said, it’s always changing. There’s new challenges, there’s new opportunities, more visitors, more things that our visitors want to see when they come to national parks. So we’re trying to just help them work through and prioritize those projects and see what we can help with.
So, why then? What do you say to the person who says, “why should I give you any money?” I pay my taxes, these are public lands, I don’t even care I don’t go to the beach, or I don’t, I don’t fly, or I could care less about lost colonies and freedom trails.” What’s the arguments to get people to support?
Well, I think the first thing, you know, philanthropy is very personal. So I feel like, on one hand, if that is the stance that they have, they’re probably not our target donor, right. So we really want to talk to and speak to people who feel the connection to these parks, either from the history, the environment, their experiences here. But really, again, as much as our federal budget does support our parks, there is more that we expect of our national parks these days from of our experience in those national parks. And right now, the funding just doesn’t align with what our I think our expectations are, as visitors of these places. And we want to spend time in these beautiful places that are accessible and well maintained, and where we can learn and relax and just enjoy the parks the way they are. And I think it’s just the reality of the situation is that the funding is not keeping pace with the need. And that’s where we come in.
Gotcha. Would you say there’s a benefit even independent of that? I mean, know trip would say, an improved seashore benefits every business on Hatteras Island. But Swells’a Doesn’t have a Hatteras Island location. Is there some sort of “a rising tide lifts all boats,” approach to it?
Well, I mean, I think when I think about it from that perspective, for community of our size, to have three national parks is pretty unique. And they are one of the main drivers of tourism, whether people are staying in Hatteras or just visiting. A lot of people that come here every year, they come back every year to visit Wright Brothers just hear the story, play in the park. Same thing for Fort Raleigh. And so they are a driver of our economy here. And I think a unique part of our economy and part of why people come here. So this is to your point, Swellsa may not have a direct tie-in but they just saw the value in keeping some of our land here and the Outer Banks protected. And really, the national parks provide a a main part of the experience of what we love about living here and visiting here.
Living here – to me that’s key. We keep talking about visitors because all parks are being visited. And I’m a visitor to the Cape Hatteras National Seashore every time I head south. But, to me, it’s the open spaces that I appreciate – the Pea Island, the open space around Wright Brother – especially the busier that we get. And I find myself sort of clinging to them know, because we may not be another Myrtle Beach or another Virginia Beach. But we’re definitely getting less and less like what we used to be. And so I think those are really the anchor, the cornerstones of what was always the original draw.
Yeah, I agree. And even though there obviously is so much development happening here in the Outer Banks, I think it’s still having three national parks that are protecting the land and protecting the history and culture of the Outer Banks is it’s unique to our community. And I think it’s really important. And that’s a lot of the feedback we get from our donors on why they Give , is that they just want to see these places continue to be protected. And also, find new ways to experience them and understand the stories that make them unique.
Is there anything else you’d like to say?
I think I was taking some notes. I think we touched on everything. Definitely want to make sure we, you know, when we when I was talking about the donors, the Visitors Bureau definitely, really appreciate their funding. Yeah, I mean, I think, like I said, I think this is I’m really excited to do this. Because again, we start kind of our standard press releases, get out of the media, but I don’t feel like we really got to tell this story of kind of how we got started and why we’re here. So I feel like, I’m just really appreciative that you were interested in helping us tell the story, because I think that’s, that’s one of my biggest things here is, well, it’s not only getting the word out that we’re here, and we’re supporting the parks and how we’re supporting the parks.
But also, I think people sometimes with Cape Hatteras, specifically, they may not realize that anywhere that you stay on Hatteras Island, when you walk over the dune, you’re in a national park. And we know from data that people treat national parks differently if they know they’re in one. And I think that probably 80% of people who stay on Hatteras don’t realize that every inch of sand on the oceanfront is protected by the National Park Service. So no, that’s just something that I think we’re trying to work on, how do we kind of boost the public’s understanding of the fact that we do have 70 miles of protected beaches here.
Kind of like when you’re a kid, right? Your parents make you buy the car, because you’re less likely to wreck it. It’s the same thing we’re kind of in, in some ways, maybe we’re at a little bit of a disadvantage, because you don’t automatically think about oh, are you and you’re not spending any money to go? You know what I mean? So in some ways, maybe we do we treat it with a little less respect than we normally would just because it’s not a conscious sort of decision that you’re like, Oh, I’m at the point. I’m at the National Park. Maybe I shouldn’t behave X, Y or Z.
Exactly. Yep.
________________________________________________________________
MAKING THE GRADE
We grilled Dare Co.’s Environmental Health Supervisor on the ABCs of inspecting kitchens.
Think you have a big job? As the Environmental Health Supervisor for Dare County, Josh Coltrain leads a team of sanitation sleuths who are responsible for monitoring every tattoo parlor, school and commercial pool. But the most high-profile gig of all is food safety, where three Environmental Health Specialists must inspect every commercial kitchen and hang a sign in plain view.
“That includes restaurants, food stands, push carts, mobile food units, institutional food, school lunch cafeterias, and meat markets,” says Coltrain, who started out in the field back in 2007. “Last fiscal year, we performed 1,531 inspections.”
Sometimes, they even have to go back and check again. Add up the phone calls with the questions — and the occasional complaint investigation — you get something like 2300 interactions with local kitchens per year. We asked Coltrain to walk us through the process of keeping every plate safe, from the moment a restaurant applies to open its doors — to the second it receives a big fat A. (We hope.) — Matt Walker
The following interview was conducted in Dec. 2022. An edited version appears in Outer Banks Milepost Issue 12.1
MILEPOST: I’ll start with the basics. What’s your exact title?
JOSH COLTRAIN: I’m the environmental health supervisor.
Can you give me an idea of what that entails and how long you’ve been doing it?
Sure. I started with the county in 2007. At the end of 2018, Jack Flythe, the previous supervisor, retired and so I became supervisor.
So you supervise all the inspectors that go into the kitchens and what not?
I do. I’m in charge of the whole unit. And it’s not just restaurant inspections. We do waste water systems, school buildings, all the childcare centers, all the commercial pools, tattoo establishments — all of that. We’re in charge of all that.
So did you start out in the field doing all that? And were you going into kitchens in 2007?
I was. We have seven different authorizations and I have all of them. I’ve done all of it over the years. I originally started out in onsite waste water. got into food inspections, and then commercial pools, then tattoos, childcare centers, schools, lead investigations, I’ve done all that.
That has to be a pretty big team. How many inspectors do you have total?
Currently, we have three in food and lodging, and two in onsite. We’re short staffed by two onsite, and 1 in food and lodging. We should have 4 on each side. And then we have 2 office support administrative specialists.
So what’s your mission statement? In particular when it comes to kitchens?
Well, in a nut shell, the food protection program’s mission is: to reduce the risk of food-borne illness and other communicable diseases; ensure protection by providing leadership resources, education, promotion of public health and safety, so people have confidence when they go out to eat; and to protect public health through the development of standards, review of plans, enforcement activities of food and lodging establishments, including the inspections of all restaurants, food stands, mobile food units, push carts, institutional food — like the hospital – elderly nutrition — like Peak Resources — school lunch rooms, any limited food service establishments — like you have at a hotel — meat markets — like in the grocery store, you may have your deli and then you go back to the meat counter, those are actually two separate inspections; and they’re permitted separately. Any bed and breakfast, inn, summer camp, jail, any residential care facilities. That’s kind of the state mission statement there.
So, you’re doing all that. it’s not just restaurants. You’re doing seafood markets, meat markets, all that.
Yep. All that. The jails, the schools, nursing homes. We do all those inspections.
Wow. It sounds like restaurants are just a fraction of the kitchens you’re responsible for. Do you know the exact number of food-prep places you have to roll into?
I don’t have that number right offhand, but I can email it to you later. But it’s in the hundreds for sure. [Ed. Note: Mr. Coltrain followed up with the following stats: “There are 478 total food service establishments — which equates to 1,210 inspections during the year. There are 295 other non-food facilities that must be inspected as well. Last fiscal year 1,531 inspections and 209 visits were performed. Visits may include complaint investigations or verification of equipment, etc. which are not full inspections. An additional 529 office/phone visits were performed which include general questions from facilities owners and operators.”]
And you have 3 inspectors who have to handle all that. That’s insane.
Yeah. And they’re broken up into different categories. Like certain establishments have to be one quarterly; others have to be done 3 times a year. Some twice a year. And some are only annual inspections — like the hospital because they’re inspected by other state and federal agencies.
So are most restaurants four times year? Three times a year?
So let’s just take the average, large restaurant, they have to be done 4 times a year. A typical fast food restaurant, where they don’t do as much cooling and reheating the next day, they only have to be done twice a year because most of that is heated to order. There’s not much saved for the next day. So a fast food restaurant is typically just twice a year.
So how do people get into this gig? What’s the background and training like?
To qualify as an Environmental Health Specialist you have to have at least a four-year degree. and of that degree, you have to have at least 30 hours concentrated in the sciences to even qualify for the position. So if meet that requirement, and you’re hired by a county, you have to go to Raleigh for what’s known as “Centralized Intern Training.” And that’s two weeks. The general Tier 2 module is the first week-long segment that goes over all the aspects of the EH field in which we have rules to enforce. Everyone must complete this module. The second segment is the two week Tier 3 concentration based module where the EHS specializes in onsite wastewater or food/lodging/institutions.
The final Tier 4 training is the post work that must be completed back with the County of employment, which consists of live inspections overseen by an already authorized agent. You do a set number of inspections, you compile all your forms and paperwork, that gets sent to the regional specialist for review. And then they schedule a time to come back. They give you another test specific to that program, so it would be on food and lodging or onsite wastewater, pools, tattoos — whatever the concentration may be. and then you actually have to go out and do another field test where you go out with the state regional specialist, you go into a facility, and you have to perform an inspection and meet the state criteria of how to perform that inspection. So there’s two separate sets of testing: the actual written version, and then a field test. And you have to pass both of those before you’re authorized by the state to go out on your own.
So for the field test, do they set up a kitchen and include a bunch of mistakes they hope you find?
Nope. You go into a regular permitted establishment like we just randomly walk in off the street, go into a kitchen – just like an unannounced inspection – and you have to go in and perform that inspection with the state regional specialist watching over you, and make sure that you give a thorough inspection, take out the violations, be able to communicate those to the restaurant facility manager, and complete the grade sheet just like the state wants it done, with all the documentation. So it’s kind of like trial by fire, so to speak.
Sounds like it. And I assume, backing up, that any restaurant has to go through a inspection process before they ever open.
Yes. So let’s say you wanted to open a facility, you would first apply to us. You’d have to put in the application, we have to review your plans, make sure that the kitchen is laid out according to the food code so that everything flows nicely. You’ve got your hand sinks set up accordingly, you’ve got adequate refrigeration, freezer spacey, you’ve got adequate cooking space, adequate cleaning/sanitizing space, you’ve got an adequate dishwasher, hot water supply. We review all of that. And if that’s approved, you build it to spec, we go in and do a preopening inspection. We test everything, hot water, refrigeration, reheating equipment – make sure that everything is up to the food code. And then we issue you a state food service permit, either for a restaurant or food stand, mobile food unite, whatever you applied for.
Then, after that, depending on the permit, you’re gonna go back in every three months, four months, six months, etc.
Exactly. Whatever category you fall into based on how you’re handling your food, how much reheating, cooling, reserving you’re doing, that will determine what category you’re based in. and then we’ come back In three months or four months and do a follow up inspection.
And then do the same thing moving forward then on out.
And how does that work? Are there beats? Does each inspector have X number of restaurants, like they’re clients? Or is it totally random?
So each inspector has a list they’re assigned. And we do change those up periodically so the same person doesn’t’ get into the same routine of inspecting the same establishment year after year. But they do have their list they’re responsible for. I just kind of oversee and make sure they’re meeting targets of getting so many done each quarter. They know what they have to get done. But as far as the inspection itself goes, they just randomly show up that day. It’s unannounced. You have no warning. We want to go in there and see how you run your facility on a day to day basis. That gives us an idea of how you’re operating on any other day. If we say, “hey, we’re coming in Friday,’ then you’re gonna be like “I better get this place up to snuff.” We want to see how they’re actually doing it on a day to day basis. So it’s completely random and unannounced.
That’s crazy. And so what happens once you walk in a door? And how many will they visit each day and what will they do?
It kind of depends. Obviously, bigger restaurants take more time because they’re’ doing more. We have to collect more temperatures, look at more stuff. So, a bigger type 4 [?] place maybe they do one in the morning and maybe 2 in the afternoon. They’ll go in, and say “I’m so and so with the health department, here to do a routine inspection.” And they’ll ask for the manager on duty. And that manager on duty will accompany them through the inspection. And they’ll go through the entire facility. They’ll want to look at if they’re cooling anything. And if they are, they’ll go back to the walk in and make sure they’re using proper cooling methods. And if they’re reheating anything , making sure they reheat it to 165. If they’ve got anything hot-holding, like on a buffet line, they want to make sure they’re hot-holding that properly. If they’re actively cooking anything at the time, let’s say they’re cooking a chicken breast, they’ll get a temperature of that and make sure it’s reaching 165. Everything on the grade sheet —which is 56 items that we have to check in an inspection — it’s either in compliance, or out of compliance. Or it could be “not observed.” So, let’s say they do oysters in the winter time, but they don’t have any in the summertime, that would be “not observed” because they’re not doing anything at that time. Or it may be something that’s not applicable to the inspection. Let’s say, pasteurized eggs are required at a nursing home, but not a regular breakfast restaurant – that would be ‘not applicable.”
But it’s a 56-item compliance sheet that we go through. If it’s marked out of compliance, they document what food code violation it is, put it on the inspection sheet, and at the end, they’ll review it with the manager on duty. “This is what was marked out of compliance, this is what you need to address, we’re gonna look at this when it comes back next time.’ then, if it happens again, the way it works is there’s a set point value for the first evaluation and then you get more for the second violation. So let’s just say that you get 1.5 points for your first violation, if we see it again then it becomes a 3 point violation moving forward. But all that is documented.
Some issues – let’s say it’s a cold-holding violation , where your walk in isn’t maintaining 41 degrees or less – that requires a verification. So we document it, you’re not in compliance, you’re not meeting temperature, we have to come back within 7 days and do a follow up to make sure you got the technician out there to get the temperature down on that walk-in and then we do a verification on that on that.
Because I’m sure there are certain violations that are more serious than others, right?
Absolutely. We have what we call critical violations. Those obviously take more points of your score. So you start with a score of a 100, and then you obviously work down from there. So, the lower the score, the more critical or repeat violations you have in that facility.
So what’s an example of a big violation? And what’s a small violation?
So, a big violation would be an issue with cold holding or re-heating or improper cook temperatures or cleaning and sanitizing where your dish machine wasn’t cleaning and sanitizing properly’; it means it wasn’t reaching the final rinse temp. Or if It’s a chemical sanitizing rinse machine you weren’t having the chemical discharged properly. Those are big violations. Those we have to go back and verify within that time frame.
So how many points are those?
It depends on if it‘ your first violation or a repeat violation. If its’ your first violation on cleaning and sanitizing, its’ maybe a point and a half. The next one would go to 3 points.
Is there like 3 strikes rule or anything?
No. not necessarily. If an issue with equipment became a habitual thing we can issue an intent to suspend, meaning we would suspend your food service permit if you don’t get this item addressed. And then it would go to an immediate suspension; you would have to stop service and get the issue fixed before you could open back up.
How far down the scale can you get? I see all A’s, I think. I don’t know if I’ve ever seen a B.
Well, 90 to 100 is an A. 80 to 90 is a B. and 70 to 79 is a C. anything less than 70 is an automatic revocation of your permit. You have to shut down, reapply and start from scratch, just like you were a brand new facility.
So you can keep going with an 80, in theory. But you’ll just come back and fixing stuff until you get an A.
Yup. You can keep operating as long as you get a 70.
But if they get dinged more every time you come in, you’re gonna drop under 70 pretty quick.
Yes. If we go in and see you have, lets’ say it’s summer and you have no refrigeration, nothing’s working and you can’t maintain temp. That would be an immediate suspension. You can’t operate if you don’t have refrigeration. Now let’s say you have a prep box that’s not working, but you have other refrigeration in the facility, that’s something where you can move those times temporarily, that would be an ‘intent to suspend.’ You can still operate, but you have to get that fixed. So that’s kind of the degree of what’s going on in there.
What are the biggest problem areas? Walk-ins? Mop buckets? Salad bars? Where do people tend to screw up?
I’d say here, especially in summer, those kitchens get really hot, so cold-holding is one we see a lot in summer. it’s hard for those prep boxes to keep up, because they’re constantly in and out of them. Other items we see are “food separated and protected —that’s kind of like the stacking order. So you go into a refrigeration unit, and maybe you’ve got some – and I’m just using this as an example – raw chicken over some salads that are ready to eat. Stacking order can be an issue. cleaning and sanitizing, dish machines require a lot of maintenance. They have to keep their techs out here frequently to make sure they’re discharging the sanitizer at the paper concentration. Or if it’s a hot water sanitizer, that those heating elements, those boosters, are working properly. So making sure that those dishes are absolutely, perfectly clean, not leaving any food residue on them., we see that one pretty frequently. Facilities themselves – floors, walls and ceilings – keeping those clean. Things break down over time; sheet rock cracks, lights go out, paint they have to keep on top of that kind of stuff. And then non-food-contact services. So equipment that’s not in contact with food, so refrigeration doors or underneath slicers and tables, things like that – so keeping those cleaned properly.
I’m flashing back to the kitchen big time now. “Clean under that slicer!” and that’s part of the issue, right? Because depending on the size of the kitchen, you could have any number of people responsible. Anyone could make a mistake and it’s a collective ding.
Absolutely. Whatever we see, it affects the whole facility. You start with 100 and it goes down from there.
Everyone’s been talking about the worker shortage. Have you noticed a difference? because if you’ve got a bunch of turnover or a bunch of new guys that’s different than an experienced staff.
Anytime you get new staff you’re obviously got to train them, so there’s that education that we have to provide, saying “look, here’s what you have to start doing. We know you’re new, but here’s what we look for… “ so a lot of what we do is education when it comes to new staff. There’s been a lot of turnover the past few years, a lot of places are short-staffed, so staffing certainly pays a part in all of this. And a lot of this falls back on the kitchen managers, too, to make sure their staff is trained on what we’re looking for. And its’ been a hectic couple of years, so with the staff turnovers and the shortages, it’s been challenging.
Isn’t there a class you can take?
Every facility has to have a certified food protection manager on duty. There are several courses you can take. The one that we offer and teach here through the county office is called Serve Safe. That’s where the three food and lodging specialists teach a two day course and administer the exam covering all the different aspects of proper food handling safety, receiving, storing, basically a t o z from when you get the food off the supply truck to coming in your facility to thawing it, cooking it, serving it, cooling it, reheating it the next day. How to clean all your dishes, sanitizing, all that is taught in that two day class.
And every kitchen has to have somebody certified on staff.
It is a requirement with the food code now that every kitchen must have a food protection manager on duty. And if you don’t, you’ll lose points for that.
Is there like a “naughty and nice “ list? Do you have a sense of which restaurants you have to worry about and who you don’t?
Well, that’s kind of a tough one to answer. Obviously after doing it for so long, we know certain facilities will struggle in some areas. But we don’t have any preconceived notions. We just go in like it’s any other inspection and start fresh and give them the opportunity and a fair shot every time we go in. some do struggle in certain areas. Maybe it’s the nature of the facility – it’s an older building or something like that. but I think in general our places do a pretty good job here. I think average score is like 97 or 98 which is something we’re proud of, because we like to provide a lot of education and help them. I think most people want to do a good job.
I see 100s pretty regularly, too.
Yeah. Most people do a really good job. And if It’s a minor issue the inspector has the discretion of dong a general comment and not actually taking the points. If it’s minor and not that egregious, we can say “Hey, you need to get this straightened up. We won’t take the points this time, but I am gonna document it.” So we do have that discretion.
Because it can be pretty picky. If you’ve never worked in a kitchen, you might not realize just how detailed it is. Some loose Saran Wrap in the reach-in can cost you.
Absolutely.
What’s the craziest or worst thing you’ve seen or heard of?
Me, personally, one of the worst things was all at one facility and it was an immediate revocation of their permit. We had to shut them down and ask people to leave. I’ll give you a couple of examples. They were doing some construction to the facility. And out back, they were using a salt treated 2 by 12 as a cutting board and chopping block. They were prepping some raw pork that was dipping down into their sugar bin underneath the table. Somebody came by and scooped up the sugar to make a sweet tea. The guy prepping some fish, cut his finger, he put a Band-Aid on it, it was still bleeding, and he still continued to prep the fish. The guy doing the dishes decided he wanted to rinse his mouth out, he scooped up some water, rinsed his mouth out, and spit it back in with the clean dishes.
Whoa. This is all one place?
All one place.
Did you think you were being punked? Start looking for hidden cameras?
It was one of the worst run places I’ve ever seen. Like I said, it was an immediate revocation of their permit.
Did they get back open?
They did. They ended up getting it straightened out and educating their staff and eventually reopened. The other one, the inspector went in and found a live box turtle in the prep sink. And the people running the facility said it was for them, they were going to cook it for themselves. We took the turtle and released it back into the woods, but they had this box turtle they were gonna cook for themselves in the prep sink.
That’s insane.
Other issues I’ve seen is several bad roach issues — and when I say bad, when you pulled boxes off the shelves you’d see hundreds of them scatter. So I’ve seen several really bad roach infestations.
If you’re in a kitchen like that working, is there like a hotline to call and whistleblow?
We do have people who call and complain to us. Mainly throughout the summer time. maybe someone had a bad meal or didn’t like the service. Some are legitimate, some are obviously a disgruntled customer. or employee. We he folks say “I used to work here, I know something going on.’ And I can only think of one time it was a true case. Rest of the time it was a disgruntled employee who was terminated and trying to get their previous employer in trouble. But anytime we get a complaint we go and investigate and find out there’s any validity to it.
That’s nuts. So what’s the lowest score you’ve handed out. Do you know?
That immediate revocation was a 54.
Wow. Have you ever shut anyone down for good? Or is there always a second chance?
Well, we close ‘em down. When it’s an immediate revocation, your permit is pulled. You can’t operate any more. You have to start over like it’s a brand new facility. If a permit is suspended, whenever you fix that item you documented you can open right back up like you were before. But if it’s revoked, that permit’s closed out and you have to reapply and get a new permit to open back up.
Anyone on the beach never gotten lower than 100?
I can’t think of anyone on top of y head. Some place have maintained high scores, 99s to 100s. most of the school lunch rooms do well, they typically get 99 to 100. And a lot of places maintain 97 , 98 or higher. And that’s something we’re proud of, too.
What about the paper score itself. Have you ever caught someone trying to change the number after the fact. Like that 54 is suddenly an 89?
I’ve never run into that. but that’s actually an offense that would have to be documented. It is against the general statues for anyone to alter the cardstock. The only one who’s allowed to touch that is the Environmental Health Specialist.
How is the relationship between the inspectors and the kitchens. Is it cool? Is it cozy? Somewhere in between?
I would say pretty much all our establishments we have good working relationships. Like is said, before, we’re proud of the scores, we’ve worked hard to have a good working relationship. We want them to have a successful business, to provide good quality food, and to run a clean facility. So we do provide a lot of education. And any time they have a question in we’re hear to answer it for them. We want to have a good relationship. I don’t want an inspector dreading going into any restaurant. Or any restaurant to go, “oh no, here comes the health department again.”
From my experience, most restaurants are their own worst critics. They might even spot a violation before you do.
Oh yeah, a lot of times it’s like, “Oh man, the new guy just put that in the-walk in, I’ll take care of it right now.” They do want to do the right thing.
Are there red flags for customers to watch for in a restaurant?
Well, if you walk in and see a 92 on the wall, to me that means something. But if you walk in and it smells off or see roaches on the wall or flies everywhere, that should be a red flag to you. Or If you sit down and your silverware or dishes don’t look very clean, stuff like that.
Yeah, I guess if your plates and forks aren’t clean, you might want to stand back up. What about for restaurants: anything they should be aware of?
I would just say ‘Attention to detail.” When you’re there in the morning, check your temperatures. Check ‘em mid-day. Check ‘em before you leave. Stay up to date with any changes to the food code. Use us as resource. If you have questions about anything, give us a call. And if we have to come out and make a visit, we will. Have an office meeting. Anytime you have a question, call us. We’re really educators. We want them to have a good successful business and we want th3 public to have a safe dining experience. Use us as a resource. But attention detail is key; if see dishes come out of the machine and don’t look right, there’s’ residue on a plate, don’t just throw them on the shelf and move on. Say “we have a problem here.” And check the machine.
Have you ever seen a floor so clean you would eat off it?
No.
Man, my old kitchen manager is going to be disappointed.
[Laughs] I wouldn’t eat anything off any floor. Ever.
Anything else you’d like to say?
A lot of people ask if they can see the inspections and previous grade sheets. And there is a link you can do that. Just google “Dare county restaurant inspections” the link that pops up, just type in the restaurant name, or food sand, or whatever, and it will bring up past inspection reports. It’s all public record.
How far back can you go?
Not sure how long that database stores it, but it’s several inspections back.
That’s crazy. Because I remember the clipboard days. How digitized and high tech has it gotten?
It’s changed over the years. we used to have the old pen an pad, and then we use google chrome books, and now we’re on to iPads. But it’s all digitized. We do printout a paper copy for the management to have, but the rest is all digitized and we upload the inspection to the state.
Up until 2009, North Carolina had its own separate food rules known as the .2600 rules. In 2009 these rules were changed by the State Legislature to incorporate the FDA food code. We are currently working on the 2017 FDA food code version which the Legislature adopts via the .2600 rules.
So the state legislature creates the food code?
They adopt the FDA food code. They have to vote whatever the current FDA food code is. And the latest version we work on is the 2017 version. And it’s several hundred pages of food code. And then the state adopt it with, say exceptions xyz. But our grade sheet of 56 items is brought in from that food code.
And the inspectors have different types of thermometers that they go in the facility with – probe thermometers, infrared thermometers, sometimes we use heat strips. We put heat strips on a dish to see if that contact surface reaches a final rinse temp. we have certain thermometers that are like a plate we can run through the dish machine, it’s a high temp registering thermometer, so when it comes out it will show us the rinse temp was 184 degrees, so we know it’s reaching the proper temp. and we have sanitizing test strips for quaternary ammonia [?] or chlorine bleach. So we know their sanitizing solutions are meeting the proper concentrations. So there’s a lot of equipment we go in with.
Sounds like James Bond!
I wouldn’t say James Bond level, but it’s a lot different than the old days of the pen and pad. It’s changed since then.
____________________________________________________________
IT’S A LITTLE MESSY
The Outer Banks’ relationship with nor’easters is more than just “complicated.” The National Weather Service’s Tim Armstrong explains why we just can’t shake these winter storms.
They say “all politics is local.” The same goes for weather. For evidence, look no further than the average nor’easter. On the Outer Banks — where even smaller coastal lows can take out a house or close down a road — these winter systems are a constant cause for concern. But drive just a few miles inland, and they might not even merit a minute of worry.
“Here in the Carolinas, anyway, the impacts are right on the coast,” says Tim Armstrong, meteorologist and Climate Program Leader at Wilmington’s National Weather Service office. “My house is five miles inland, and I don’t really worry so much about nor’easters bringing any kind of damage.”
Considering the vast, unperturbed masses living between here and Asheville — not to mention further west — you start to realize why so little attention gets devoted to these frequent winter visitors. But just because mainland America might not sweat their impacts, that doesn’t coastal residents can rest any easier. In fact, as our coastal populations get denser — and our planet’s climate grows warmer —more and more people will be forced to pay attention.
“Even if we don’t see any change in nor’easter strength and intensity compared to what we’ve seen in the past 50 to 100 years, the impacts from the storms will continue to increase because of rising sea levels,” says Armstrong. “So, you’ll have more coastal flooding — and more severe coastal flooding — affecting properties that were considered safe before.”
We asked Mr. Armstrong to explain how these storms work, and what makes them uniquely special to our strip of sand. — Matt Walker
Photo: Daniel Pullen
The following interview took place in September of 2022. An edited version appears in Issue 11.4
What’s your name? And what do you do?
Tim Armstrong. I am a meteorologist, and also the Climate Program Leader, here at the National Weather Service office in Wilmington, North Carolina.
I take it that’s your field of expertise then.
Yeah, everyone here has a general degree in meteorology. My area of expertise, that I’ve picked up since ‘ve been here, is local climate studies specific to the eastern portions of North and South Carolina. Something I’ve been active in for 10 years or so.
So how long have you been in the weather service then?
More than 20 years now.
So let’s start with the basics. What is a nor’easter? And what are its characteristics?
Sure. A nor’easter is essentially a large area of low pressure that generally forms in the cooler half of the year — so October through April or so, is nor’easter season. Most occur in the winter time. But the best way to tell what they are is to contrast them with a tropical system. All storms – whether it’s a thunderstorm in your backyard or a hurricane or a nor’easter – all of them feed on temperature contrasts. And in a thunderstorm like we have in the summer, and in a tropical storm, it’s vertical temperature contrasts. You have a lot of heat near the surface, and you have a lot of cold five or 10 miles in the sky, that’s the temperature difference that fuels those storms.
With, nor’easters it’s completely different. It’s still a temperature contrast, but it’s a horizontal temperature contrast across the earth. It’s heat out over the ocean or down to the south — Florida and offshore off the Carolinas – heat there contrasting with cooler air over land or moving down from the north, from that colder ocean water that’s off the mid-Atlantic or northeast coast. It’s that horizontal temperature contrast that’s the fuel for a non-tropical system like nor’easters. And not every little low pressure that goes across the ocean in the cooler months become a nor’easter. A nor’easter is essentially when one of those finds a strong area of temperature contrast, strengthens with strong gale force winds and so forth. And they’re called nor’easters because the wind direction we see from those storms — along the coast here, and up to the mid-Atlantic – is from the northeast. The storm itself takes an offshore track, so the prevailing winds we see during those storms is northeast.
Is it safe to say that they affect a broader geography then, too? You think of a hurricane, it semes like the impacts are more concentrated – think of the cone of uncertainty. Do nor’easters impact a wider territory?
Geographically, nor’easters do cover much, much more area. For example, Hurricane Hugo, one of the biggest storms in my experience, came into south Carolina and it was about he size of South Carolina. The eye was small, but the sprawling area of winds and rain surrounding it was about the size of the entire state. A nor’easter can be producing strong thunderstorms and tornadoes in Florida, and at the same time be producing snow and almost hurricane force winds across the mid-Atlantic and southern parts of New England. So they cover huge, huge swathes of real estate. Much larger than any hurricane would.
Wow. And yet it seems like they get less attention. Is that because they’re more common? Or because they produce less damage overall? Or…
They are more common. The damage is going to occur– when they produce damage, which is not all the time. A lot of nor’easters come through and bring marine impacts, with strong winds and large seas and so on. But unless you’re out there in a boat, or right on the beach itself, you just see it as a typical wintertime storm, brining rain, cloudy skies, some breezy winds. On the Outer Banks, I’m sure you have a different perspective being such a marine-influenced area.
For example, you have a nor’easter here in Wilmington, most people – unless they’re on the beach or in the ocean – don’t see it as more than just a rainy cloudy day.
So where, a hurricane cane go inland and make a mess, nor’easters really are a coastal phenomenon at heart.
Yes. I think the big impact, and this is mainly north of the Carolinas, is when nor’easters bring substantial ice storms and heavy snows. This would be the north mid-Atlantic and into New England. Some of their all-time record snowfalls are associated with nor’easter systems.
And anytime you have snow on the coast from Virginia south automatically stand out. What about pressure? Or windspeed? What are some of the other ways that they differ from hurricanes?
So, the central pressure. If you put a barometer in the center of a nor’easter, you’re going to get a reading sometimes that looks similar to a strong tropical storm or even a weak hurricane. You’re going to get a barometer reading that’s down to say 985mb in a strong nor’easter. If we saw that in a tropical system, that would be a strong tropical storm. Possibly even a weak Category One hurricane. But in a hurricane the winds are very, very concentrated in the center. Near the eyewall of the storm is where you have your powerful winds and big impacts. With nor’easters the impacts are spread out over a much, much larger area. So normally you won’t see winds quite as strong, but they cover a much, much larger geographic extent. And its’ because of being in a marine influenced area like you are there, I’m sure a lot of your readers have a quite a bit of experience on the ocean, it’s when you get those large, large swaths of wind like that where you can get very, very large seas, and beach erosion that will last for days sometimes with a nor’easter.
I guess they last longer, too, huh? Is that one of the other factors?
Yes. Because they cover such a large geographic area, once one starts impacting our area, it can be sometimes a couple of days before a storm moves far enough away to remove its impact. Hurricanes, because they are geographically small storms, you can fit them into a single weather shift. Hurricane Isaias hit here less than 2 years ago. And it literally was a six or eight hour storm, from first impact to last impact.
And you’d never have that for a nor’easter.
Very true.
They call hurricanes “typhoons” in the South Pacific. Do other areas of the planet have a version of nor’easters, or are they unique to us?
I’m certain they do. I know the analog of the Gulf Stream that goes off the coast of Japan – what they call the Kyushu current – gives a very similar climatological set up. They have cold air coming off the Chinese and Russian mainland that reaches the warm water off Japan, and that’s a region of very similar strong non-tropical storm activity during their cooler season. I would imagine the southern oceans, from South America and going around the planet there, maybe even as far as New Zealand and Southern Australia probably has an analog there as well. I’m not as versed in weather out there. But any place where you have potential for strong temperature contrasts, you have potential for strong storms like nor’easters.
Is there an average number of nor’easters per year? Is there a gauge that the Weather Service uses to determine how active a season is?
I don’t have a climatological number. I know we keep very good stats on hurricanes — for example, I can tell you the averages for tropical storms, and hurricanes and major hurricanes. I don’t know that I’ve run across a statistic before about the average number of nor’easters or East Coast storms. For us, at the latitude of the Carolinas, I’m guessing that we have — and this is not based on research, I’m just trying to think of a number — over a course of a winter season, we may have on the order of two dozen low pressure systems that go up the coast. Maybe only a couple of which would really earn the name of “nor’easter,” with those powerful impacts in terms of gale force winds and beach erosion and so forth. That number would increase as you went north up the coast. Once you get north of Cape Hatteras, those mid Atlantic states get a larger number of those systems than we do. But I don’t have exact numbers.
It’s funny, too. Because if I were to tell you we’re going to get hit by two hurricanes a year, people would be like, “I’m moving!” But I guess that’s because they’re less destructive, right?
In general, yes. But there a have been a few exceptions in the past. The one that really sticks out in my head, is march of 1993. It’s often called “the storm of the century” because it really, really powerful. It never really was true nor’easter because the path of the storm was just inland. But there were tremendous impacts in terms of hurricane-force winds, and snow all the way down to South Carolina. And tremendous wind damage up and down the coast, form an incredibly powerful non-tropical storm.
So, you’re saying it’s not technically a nor’easter but it had similar impacts?
It had similar impacts and it was formed by the same situation that forms a nor’easter. It’s just that the track of the storm, instead of being out over the ocean, was inland from the coast. So, being on the east side of the storm, the strongest winds were from the from the south and southwest. Normally, when a nor’easter tracks offshore, you’re strongest winds are from the north and northeast. Hence the name.
Conversely, we weren’t going to use Sandy because it was a hurricane. But mark said we almost have to, because even though it was a tropical system, it had a lot of the same characteristics as nor’easter. Including the fact that all the damage came from the nor’easter and at a distance. Can you give me any more detail?
Sandy was a really interesting situation because it was a hurricane off the coast. But as it left the influence of the gulf stream and got into some cooler water, and started to experience those horizontal temperature contrasts, it actually transitioned from a tropical storm into a non-tropical storm. So no longer truly a hurricane anymore, but producing tremendous impacts that unfortunately combined the worst influences of a tropical system – for instance, intensely heavy rain – with the size and sprawling nature of non-tropical or nor’easter type storm.
One stat they did have in the county, it was a 16-millon dollar storm in Dare County.
That’s amazing.
And it didn’t even hit us. Which I guess speaks to how much energy they have. So why did it keep its name? Is that a public safety issue? And what’s the criteria there for getting a name or not?
We only officially, in this country, name tropical systems. So a tropical storm or hurricane receives a name. But, to prevent confusion – and to not produce in the public’s eye – the false impression that a storm is no longer a threat. Even after it loses its official tropical designation and becomes a non-tropical storm, they’ll keep the name attached to it and keep using hurricane warnings to indicate that while it may not scientifically or meteorologically be a tropical system anymore, the impacts are still there in terms of high winds, heavy rain and the potential to do significant damage on the coast.
Is that why it was a ‘super storm?’ Because it had both characteristics? Because it sounds like it had the size of a nor’easter and the strength of a hurricane?
Superstorm is not a well-defined scientific term or anything. I’ve heard it applied to several different storms. In the early ‘90s, there was a storm called “the perfect storm” off the new England coast. Again, it had a hurricane that formed in the middle of it, but on the outside it was a large, large non-tropical storm. Sometimes when you get these hybrid storms that combine the worst elements of a tropical and non-tropical system, you can have tremendous damage spread out over a large, large area. Thankfully, those are very rare.
Do they serve a function? I mean, we think of them as anything form a buzzkill to a catastrophe, but is there a benefit to them?
When you get a storm system anywhere on the planet, its purpose is to try to even out temperature contrasts. That’s what your little pop up thunderstorms do in the summertime. It’s very, very warm near the surface; it’s very cold ten miles up. That thunderstorm’s purpose in life, essentially, is to try to take some of that heat from the surface and move it upstairs where its’ very, very cold in the upper atmosphere. And it brings that cold air from the upper atmosphere down to the surface. So you’re trying to even out temperature contrasts. That’s pretty much the whole reason for weather on earth. So nor’easter weather systems form on the boundary from cold arctic air to the north and warm tropical air to the south. And they’re trying to mix those two masses of air together to essentially even out those temperature contrasts. And that’s the purpose of all weather, and specifically nor’easters.
That’s interesting. It’s a regulation; bringing balance back to some degree.
Trying to. And it’s a never-ending scenario. Because if you think about: how is energy deposited on the earth? It’s from the sun. and closer to the equator is always going to get more energy than areas near the poles. So you’re always going to have that temperature contrast reinforced every day that the sun’s out. So you’re always going to have storms trying to undo what the sun is doing everyday.
So how destructive can they get then?
In terms of impacts, a strong nor’easter can very easily produce the same impacts you would see with a Category One hurricane. Wind speeds of 75 mph, 80mph in gusts. Because the winds effect such large areas of ocean you can have fully developed seas. Even shallow coastal waters here can be 15-plus feet; out over deeper ocean water, near and east of the gulf stream, it would not surprise me at all if there are reliable reports of 40-50 foot seas during a powerful nor’easters. The amount of rain they can drop can be similar to a hurricane; I’ve seen reports of 6-8 inches of rain. And, of course, in the winter with colder air in place — mainly north of the Carolinas — a nor’easter can drop feet of snow for the cities up in New England.
And occasionally we get snow here. I think it was 1973, one dropped a bunch of snow. And we also lost a hotel. Is snow a clear sign that you have a doozy?
Not always. A lot of our larger snow storms, at least here in Wilmington, occurred with what looked like a fairly weak storm system, where the storm happened to stall in just the right place across Florida and we’ve got enough cold air in place that what would’ve been a half inch to one inch of rain fall as five to ten inches of snow. Now, I will also say, that some of the very powerful nor’easters we’ve had in the past, like that February 1973 storm, have dropped excessive amounts of snow across the Carolinas. But just because you have a nor’easter, it doesn’t guarantee snow here in the Carolinas; and just because we have snow, it doesn’t’ guarantee it was a nor’easter.
I guess that’s weather. There’s no slam dunks. That being said, are nor’easters easier to forecast than a hurricane? Or is it harder?
One thing that makes nor’easter easier to forecast is.., take a hurricane for example, with that very narrow swath of intense winds near the eye. If you’re off in your forecast by 30 or 40 miles, you may have completely messed up your forecast in terms of wind directions and impacts on a certain city. With a nor’easter, because the weather impacts span such a large, large area – sometimes hundreds of miles horizontally at a time will have pretty much the same weather, in terms of 30 to 50 mph winds, and heavy rain and so forth. They’re easier to forecast in that regard.
Is it also easier to see them coming since you’re looking at weather coming from a distance with more predictability?
our weather models – when you get out 3, 4 five days – to seem to handle non-tropical systems a little bit better than they do tropical systems. There’s advanced warning with both. But in terms of specific impacts at a point, it’s probably still easier to forecast a non-tropical system tan it is a tropical system.
And your goal is always to warn the public, so you’ll be erring on the side of the worst case scenario. And if you’ve got a big piece of real estate to worry about, it’s probably easier to sound the alarm and say “look alive everybody.” Have you ever issued an evacuation for a nor’easter?
Not in my experience here, but I could easily see — especially with sea level rise continuing like it is – that if you had a powerful nor’easter that occurred at a spring tide, for example, where the astronomical tide levels are already going to be high. You could have enough flooding, potentially, that would drive evacuations. I have not seen that in my time here; but it would not surprise me if that would be the case some point in the future.
Well, here on the Outer Banks, we just had a couple of big storms in May and early November. They had to shut the bridge down to Hatteras Island. We lost a couple of homes. And I feel like our nor’easter season’s getting longer. And our tourism season is definitely getting longer. I mean, May is pretty late for a three-day event, wouldn’t you agree?
Yes. May, you’re certainly getting into the warmer part of the year. It’s difficult to find enough cool air, I would think by that point, to get a large enough temperature contrast to drive a true nor’easter any more. In fact, in the past 10 years, we’ve had several late may tropical systems impact southern North Carolina. So I would think by May you’re not in nor’easetr season, it’s more of an early troika season by that point.
More on that in a minute. But you say NOAA or the weather service doesn’t keep track of “worst nor’easters” like they do, say, hurricanes.
No. I did some research here a few years ago looking at what were the lowest barometric pressures ever measured in Wilmington, which would mainly be tropical storms and hurricaes. But we’ve also seen some nor’easters go into that. And, there was a nor’easter in March of 1932 that is our sixth lowest barometric pressure on record – 970 millibars. Which is a category 2 hurricane essentially. The impacts weren’t quite as bad as you would see from a category 2 hurricane, thankfully, but in terms of pressure you surely can get really wound up storms that are not tropical in origin.
I wonder how that would’ve felt here. Because as you said, we’re even more stuck in the ocean.
Yeah, Outer banks certainly, of any spot in the Carolinas, is going to have the most impacts; you stick out farther to the east and you’re surrounded by water. There’s an idea we have when we measure winds – marine exposure versus land exposure. And marine exposure is what you would have on the outer banks with the sound on your west and the ocean to the east. So there’s no friction to slow winds down, like trees and buildings, like you have on land. So you attain higher wind velocities there than anywhere on land in the Carolinas.
Gotcha. And that makes sense: we stick out, we’re surrounded by elements.
Definitely. As we’re talking , I looked to see what the lowest barometric pressure Cape Hatteras saw in the Ash Wednesday storm. And it occurred on march 7. 989 millibars was the minimum pressure .and 989 could be a category 1 hurricane in some places. A very, very powerful storm.
Is that the lowest reading we’ve had, since then? Would you know of a lower read?
I’m almost certain other hurricanes would’ve brought much, much lower pressure readings. Emily in 1993, the eye moved so close to Hatteras, I’m sure the pressure would be much, much lower.
But as far as unnamed storms?
It’s probably one of the top non-tropical storms, I’m sure. Here in Wilmington we had that storm in 1932 at 970. We had a superstorm in march 93, that was 974.6. and there also was a nor’easter in in march of 1873 in Wilmington and we got down to 978 millibars. 989.2 has probably been broken multiple times in Hatteras.
Of course, some of the anecdotal evidence may feel worse than the numbers imply. And a lot of what makes storms memorable is the number of people who have to experience it, right?
And the population has grown so much, you’re going to get different views of a storm form the 1950s versus one from today.
Is that the real x-factor as we face climate change moving forward. So many more people are living in areas that are affected by floods, or wildfires, or storms?
That’s certainly an aspect to it. More people live in more at-risk areas than they did 100 years ago. That’s true. But it’s also true that climate change is producing impacts in areas that never saw them before, whether people were there or not. The amount of beach erosion we see here in association with nor’easters or hurricanes is worse now because the ocean is eight inches higher than it was 70 years ago. Because the air is warmer now, it holds more water. And so the same thunderstorm that held an inch of rain 100 years ago, now drops an inch and a quarter. So all your statistics are changing because of climate change, in terms of coastal flooding, in terms of the amount of rain storms drop, and so on.
That’s the first time I‘ve ever heard that number: 8 inches in 70 years?
That’ correct. We’ve had a tide gauge in Myrtle Beach since the 50s, and it’s recorded eight inches of sea level rise. And that number’s going to change from station to station up and down the coast, but for most of the east coast of the US, it’s about eight inches of sea level rise.
Even six inches is half-a foot.
And that number is predicted to not just continue to rise, but to accelerate its rise at a faster rate through this century.
So how else is climate change affecting nor’easters? Is there more frequency? Intensity? All of the above? And why?
Well, I’ve only found a couple of papers that have been published on this subject, and the evidence for this is not easy to tease out of the data. But, essentially, there’s two competing factors at work here on the East Coast of the US for nor’easters. I mentioned earlier how nor’easters purpose in life is to form in areas of strong, horizontal temperature contrast across hundreds of miles of land or ocean. As climate change continues through this century, the poles are actually warming faster than the equator. So in terms of temperature contrasts across the planet, we’re actually seeing those decrease. So on a global scale, you could see the number and intensity of these non-tropical storms actually decrease. Because there’s just less temperature contrast around to fuel them. However, there is a local effect here on the East Coast of the US, mentioned in this paper , where the subtropical ridge — we call it the Bermuda High in the summer time – could actually extend farther north, both in summer and winter time. And that could lead to, right along the Mid=Atlantic coast of the US, an intensification of that temperature gradient, which could – at least from the Carolinas to the Mid-Atlantic – actually breed an increase and a strengthening of nor’easters. Now, that’ just from one paper there. I haven’t seen any other research team take a stab at verifying if that’s true or not. And I’m not aware of any observational information that shows nor’easters are changing their frequency or intensity over time. But, there is some science to back up the idea that the Mid-Atlantic US could see an increase in the intensity and the number of nor’easters. But that would not be reflected globally.
That reminds me of a story I did in the late 90s on what climate change could do to hurricanes. At the time, some of the discussion was, maybe a warmer planet might not make it worse. But it hurricanes do seem to be intensifying faster more frequently.
It depends on what data set you’re looking at. Globally, there has not been a change in the number of hurricanes around the world. Certainly, the past 25 years have been very, very active in the Atlantic. We’ve seen record breaking seasons the last 20 to 25 years. But there’s two tropical cyclone trends that have shown themselves: one is that the frequency of your really powerful storms, category fours and fives, has ticked up the past thirty years or so; the second that has even more confidence to it is, the amount of rainfall produced by tropical storms and hurricanes has increased substantially. And that is almost directly because of climate change. The fact tha the atmosphere is warmer, it can hold more water. And that means a hurricane is going to be able to produce heavier rainfall than it would have in an overall cooler atmosphere. And we’ve certainly seen that. Think about it: starting with hurricane Floyd in 1999, with 20 plus inches of rain in parts of eastern North Carolina. And we thought, that’s it; that’s as much as a storm can produce. And then came Matthew, which dumped over 30 inches of rain in places. So we are seeing a new climate develop, perhaps, in terms of what these really, really high end storms can do.
Is it safe to say that , if we’re talking about the atmosphere holding more water, a big nor’easter could hold more water as well?
That would be correct. You would have the ability to produce heavier rainfall and even paradoxically, heavier snowfall in the Northeast. So, for example, in upstate New York, instead of being 20 degrees with light snowfall, it might be 25 degrees with heavy snow, perhaps.
So, it’s like they say “all politics is local.’ All weather is local. It doesn’t ‘matter if there’s fewer nor’easters globally, if you’re getting hit harder where you are, that’s really the issue, correct?
Yeah. And it’s the really intense storms that leave their mark, that produce the tremendous amounts of damage that make these storms memorable. You’re gonna forget the 20 weak nor’easters or weak non tropical systems, as long as that one is producing tremendous impacts.
Another change that’s happened with hurricanes is the rapid intensification prior to landfall. And that has to do with sea surface temperatures. Anything similar going on with nor’easters? Or is there potential?
Not anything that I’ve read yet. That’s a good question that’s outside of my area of expertise, unfortunately. It’s certainly been well-documented with satellite and observational evidence that at the core of some of these nor’easters, especially when they’re right on the edge of the gulf stream where the temperature contrasts are really powerful, that they can spin up a really tight core that almost looks tropical-like. It’s not. But it will have thunderstorms around it, and you’ll get a very, very strong winds right around a center that will have a clear spot. Not technically an eye, but a clear spot at the center sometimes. But I’m not sure how the frequency or intensity of that has changed with climate change.
So, that’s the other thing that blows my mind. There’s only been two papers on this. You think of the time and energy that’s been focused on hurricanes or wild fires or droughts or sunny day flooding. Why are nor’easters getting so little attention? Are they just not sexy enough?
A lot of the impacts are out over the ocean where very few people are impacted. But certainly coastal impacts are really significant from these storms, so there probably should be more research directed at it. I know one research project that still gets talked about here is in the 1980s there was a project called the GALE Project – Genesis of Atlantic Lows Experiment. And they ran lots of research flights, and they were launching extra upper air balloons to collect data, they set up special research radars along the coast. And they were essentially trying to figure out what makes these storm really explode once they get off the edge of the Carolinas. And some of the data that came from that indicated the role that the strong temperature contrasts that develop in the wintertime along the gulf stream, particularly when you have a cold arctic air mass push out over the Gulf Stream and you get those really intense mix of air masses — air that’s maybe 20-25 degrees pushing off the beaches and within a couple of hours it’s out over 78 degree water in the Gulf Stream – and the crazy things that the atmosphere does when there’s that much temperature contrast going on in such a small area there, can really drive these storms to intensify very, very rapidly. One of the more interesting findings (at least to me) was that when arctic air encountered the Gulf Stream off the Carolinas, the rate of energy transfer (heat moving from the ocean to the atmosphere) was roughly equal to what you’d see during a category 1 hurricane.
Crazy. Apparently, NCSU is using former WWII spy planes to forecast snow storms. Have you seen this?
I haven’t, but the data it collects will certainly be helpful. Getting profiles of pressure, temperature, and winds inside a developing Nor’easter will help forecasts out in real-time, but perhaps even more important will be the research data they collect that will help improve our understanding of how these storms develop and strengthen.
I wonder if it might take another a major Ash Wednesday type event – or just more population growth in coastal areas – to spark more research.
Could be.
One that last thought then. You were saying one of the impacts is that warmer air is going to push lower in the future. So might we see more heavy stuff?
The idea with climate change is that the sub-tropical ridge of high pressure – what we call the Bermuda high in summer – in winter, it shifts farther south to the Caribbean. But it’s expected have a more northern position, especially in the winter time. So it’s going to allow warmer air to bleed north with more frequency and a little more intensity than it has in the past. So that means every time a cold air mass comes down from Canada across the Great Lakes toward the Carolinas , there’s going to be warmer air waiting for it. So, at least on a regional scale, across the Carolinas and the Northeast, we could see our temperature contrast increase. Not globally, jus regionally, and that could fuel an increase in the number and intensity of these nor’easter type storms.
It would be interesting to see how this plays in during the November and May storms. Because that’s when we’d have more Bermuda highs, right?
Yes, the shoulder seasons.
Because that was pretty nuts. Granted the houses that went in were on the edge. But to have the bridge shut down in early November is unique. And obviously san increased population is going to change everything, too. Because more people means more infastructurue, which means more damage damage and more problems.
More people in harm’s way there, certainly. And you’ll have more high -end property and just more people in the path of these storms in areas that are directly impacted by them.
So, moving forward, up , what elements would make for an evacuation situation?
Well, obviously advancing sea level rise is one. Even when there’s not a storm going on, the ocean’s going to be a little bit higher. We have periods of the year when we have unusually large tides, just from the effects of the moon, we call those spring tides or occasionally you hear the term king tides. When a nor’easter occurs at the same time as those kind tide events you’re going to have higher background water levels with a couple more feet of surge from the nor’easter storm. You add sea level rise on top of that, and unfortunately, you’ve got areas that never would have received significant coastal flooding having big impacts from that. So I can see that in the future as several of these factors continue to increase in tandem, that coastal flooding impacts could possibly drive evacuataions in the future.
So a places along Hatteras where we already see flooding impacts, suddenly it impacts it even worse – and then add a population spike – the powers that be might say “get out of here because we don’t ‘want to rescue you.” Just like a named storm.
Well, I should preface that evacuations aren’t anything that the Weather Service does. We certainly brief emergency management at the county, city and local level on the weather we’re anticipating, but it’s up to those officials to make the calls about evacuations.
You provide the information, they make the decision. Hurricanes get all the attention because they always have. And they’re also more uncertain. It’s a lot clearer for folks to understand when an nor’easter is going to come.
Too, with a nor’easter, here in the Carolinas anyway, the impacts are right on the coast. My house is five miles inland, and I don’t really worry so much about nor’easters bringing any kind of damage to my property here. Once you get to the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast, where there can be heavy snow, the impacts can reach hundreds of miles inland. But you contrast the very narrow coastal effects here in the Carolinas with a hurricane — Hurricane Florence was killing people with flooding over 100 miles inland from the beaches. There were damaging winds of 100 mph many miles inland from the beaches producing widespread devastation. I think in terms of the potential to affect a lot of people that aren’t just on the coastal strip, hurricanes check all the boxes. Where here, in the Carolinas anyway, the impacts are offshore or right on that coastal strip.
That’s interesting. It might explain why, culturally speaking, we on the Outer Banks have such a strong connection with Nor’easters. They really are our storms compared to parts inland — or Even compared to Wilmington.
And you can certainly own those storms when you live on the Outer Banks. You’re going to be the one part of North Carolina that’s getting absolutely reamed by a storm, where Raleigh and the inland cities are wondering “What’s the big deal?’ Because they got a little bit of rain out of it.
So, if that’s the case why — and to be clear, the weather service does not name winter storms, correct?
Correct. The weather service still, as an agency, only names tropical storms and hurricanes.
But the Weather Channel does.
They do. And I wasn’t privy to any of the discussion – if there was any – that went on with that. All I know is the weather service, in cooperation with the world meteorological organization, only names tropical storms and hurricanes. As far as I know, there was never any collaboration done between the weather channel and other agencies with the naming of winter storms and nor’easters.
So it’s a media thing? Get eyeballs on the screen you reckon?
I don’t really know, so I wouldn’t want to comment. We certainly value our collaborative approach to how we operate with other meteorological agencies from the Caribbean and from Canada through the World Meteorological Organization, so we’ll stick to that framework for now. But if there’s a need, a public need, where they think it would help preparedness to name other types of systems than we’ll work through those channels to get that done on a cooperative international scale.
Well, here’s my concern: my insurance deductible goes up for named storm, right?
Right. Down here, as well.
And maybe I’m being cynical, but I picture a bunch of insurance lobbyists working the Hill to get winter storms named as much as possible for that reason. Have you ever heard of any pressure to name more storms?
Not that I’ve heard of. As far as I know there’s never any political discussion when it comes to live weather events.
This might be asking a lot, but one thing that’s been said, is whether it’s floods or droughts or wildfire, 100 year events aren’t 100 year events anymore. Are nor’easters in that same category?
It’s difficult to stay in terms of the number and intensity yet. There’s that one research paper I reference that says we may see a local increase in the intensity and the number of nor’easters on the Mid-Atlantic coast. We haven’t really seen that anecdotally, here, just yet.
But even if we don’t’ see any change in nor’easter strength and intensity compared to what we’ve seen in the past 50 to 100 years, the impacts from the storms will continue to increase because of rising sea levels – so you’ll have more coastal flooding, and more severe coastal flooding, affecting properties that were considered safe before. And you’re going to have an increase in the amount of rainfall. A nor’easter that tracks close to the coast can produce locally heavy rainfall. And that should become more and more of a threat as cliamaet change continues through this century and beyond. So even if that one research paper is wrong, and we continue to see base level activity. The impacts from the storms will continue to increase through time.
Even if we’re just looking at normal patterns, are we due for another Ash Wednesday? It’s been 60 years. Safe to say in the next 40 we’ll see something of that nature, no pun intended?
I wouldn’t say ‘safe to say.’ When we talk about a one-in-100 year storm, that means it has a 1% annual chance of occurring. And whether it’s been last year or 100 years ago, it doesn’t mean that his is the year that it happens. But the background percentage chance may be increasing in terms of number an intensity. But certainly the impacts of the storm, coastal flooding rainfall, will be rising as time goes on.
That’s crazy. What would an Ash Wednesday look like now you reckon?
That’s hard to say. The Morehead office might have a better idea. But we’ve had eight incches of sea level rise since then, basically. Go look at those bench marks and add eight inches to that. Find what your rainfall totals were, and multiply that by another 10 to 15 %. Even if there’s no change of windspeed or track, the impacts from those factors alone will certainly be higher than what we had in 1962.
And population, too. Right? Dare County had roughly 6,000 people then. Now it’s more than 36,000. The difference in infrastructure impacts will be massive. And the people affected were resilient coastal people, who’d grown up here in all sorts of weather events. They were probably used to losing power for a few days. They weren’t ma-and-pa retiree who just moved here and only know the sunny times.
One thing I will say that may counter some of these concerns — and may even be an improvement — is there’s been a lot of infrastructure improvements that have been made in the past 2O years, at least here. Power utilities, and communication utilities are being put under ground where they’re not as susceptible to damage. If there’s an analog to that going on on the Outer Banks, you might see the impacts aren’t as severe if there’s been remediation on what may be damaged.
Any advice for coastal residents moving forward? Any warnings, affirmations, anything to say to people as they consider this information?
Well, in the near term, the Weather Service’s focus is on the next 7 days. But we provide forecasts and even outlooks that go beyond that from our National Centers. The weather prediction center in DC will send out two and three and four week outlooks, actually, showing areas that are expected to have above or below normal precipitation. But within seven days we can start sending out alerts. Special briefings on our webpages and to the public media and emergency management where we try to forecast these storms and the impacts they may have. So pay attention to the weather. Just because it’s not tropical season during the winter time, it is nor’easter season. So, certainly stay tuned to your local and national weather service office for updates on developing storms that you see.
I guess that’s all you can do right? You can’t control the weather, but you can control your response.
Your personal level of preparedness for it, yeah.
Any relation between the seasons? We two shoulder season nor’easters. And a dud of hurricane season into September. Any idea how the two might impact each other? I mean you always hear about La Nina years and El Nino years with hurricanes — any correlation to nor’easters?
If anything, it could be an inverse correlation. La Nina, the pattern we’re in right nw – despite the fact it’s been a very, very calm hurricane season so far – normally is associated with an active hurricane season. And that’s because you have less wind shear across the Atlantic so storms have an easier time to form and then become stronger. Hasn’t worked out this year necessarily, but that’s what we’ve historically. During the winter time, La Nina will typically bring us a warm, dry winter – very few storms systems. The storm track is farther north, generally north of the Carolinas. We saw that last winter, where we had relatively low rainfall totals. Lots of sunlight. And warm temperatures most of the winter here. An E Nino winter you have a lot of very strong subtropical jet stream activity from the pacific, across Mexico, and then across the southeastern US. Lots of storm systems in the winter time; lots of wind shear to keep the summer hurricanes down. And lots of disturbances that have the capability to form into coastal storms and nor’easters . So El Nino years would be more active in terms of our nor’easters season, if you want to think of it that way.
But then, at least locally, we had a couple doozies nor’easters and no hurricanes.
Interesting. Because down ere, we had low rainfall totals. In fact, we were in a drought for part of the winter and into the spring months. But it is amazing the changes we can see just in our state. But the Outer banks is on the edge of a lot of things. It’s a really unique area on this earth.
But it might be like you said before – we’re right on the cost. Even being on the edge of something slightly stronger can make the difference. And it doesn’t matter what the large pattern is like if you’re the one percent that’s taking a hit.
That’s true.
Is there a possibility these patterns could all change? El Nino and La Nina might not mean what they used to. Is there some level of randomness that’s being introduced?
It’s certainly evolving research in all of this. I received an email about a year ago talking about the Weather Service’s capability to forecast El Nino has actually deceased a little bit in the past 10 years compared to back in the year 2000 and the late 90s. They’re also seeing that where El Nino and La Nina’s water temperatures in the Pacific, where the anomalies are the strongest, have actually shifted positions over the past years compare to before. So it is an evolving area of research, always trying to figure out what the earth is telling us with the weather patterns that we see.
And it’s funny, too. Humans aren’t thinking about the fact that the weather is changing, our understanding of the weather has changed. So what might have worked before, might not work in the future.
That is one possibility. But certainly the capability for monitoring the earth, with satellites and buoys, and super computers to model what is going on and try to precinct future is increasing with leaps and bounds. So I have no doubt whatsoever that we will surmount any sort of temporary setbacks and learn how to forecast this stuff better and better every day.
____________________________________
Sometimes, it’s hard to stay stoked on the Outer Banks. From the housing crisis to child-care shortages to substance abuse struggles, it’s definitely not all blue skies and beach days.
Just ask Marie E. Holland. As a mental health supervisor (LCMHS) and licensed clinical addiction specialist (LCAS) at Nags Head’s Holland and Associates Counseling, PLLC, she encounters the full range of local stressors.
“What I’m seeing in our practice is that people are getting hit from every angle. Whether it’s affordable housing, inflation, anxiety, trauma, interpersonal conflict, finances, or access to healthcare stressors. And, of course, there’s always addiction.”
An innate interest in human behavior and a talent for truly listening spurred Holland to earn her master’s degree in education with a concentration in counseling from NC State in 2008. Since then, she has dedicated herself to using research and evidence-based techniques to enhance the counseling process for her clients. She provides direct outpatient therapy, runs the group practice, and supervises other provisionally licensed individuals seeking full licensure.
One thing she’s learned? Treating mental health is never “one size fits all.”
“We, as human beings, because of all of our life experiences, come up with coping skills,” she says. “Sometimes they’re the best things for us, and other times they’re not. There is no one right way to be mentally well.”
The good news? While we can’t control what life throws at us, we can always learn ways to regulate our emotions, even in the most stressful times. We sat down with Ms. Holland to get a sense of how people can handle the worst personal storms — and what local resources stand ready to help keep our heads above water. — Terri Mackleberry
The following interview took place in July of 2022. An edited version appears in Outer Banks Milepost, Issue 11.3.
What is your background and training?
I graduated from North Carolina State University with a Masters Degree in Education and a concentration in Counseling in 2008. My educational training has led to a life-long dedication of advocacy for my clients. I strive to use research and evidenced-based techniques to enhance the counseling process. It’s important to note that I’m a licensed clinical mental health supervisor LCMHS licensed clinical addiction specialist.
What made you get into this career?
People’s behavior has always interested me and I enjoy talking and listening, so it’s good fit.
How do you describe your job?
I am a licensed professional that does provide direct outpatient therapy. At the same time, I supervise other provisionally licensed individuals seeking full licensure. And I also run a group practice that I’m a part of. It’s one job but three separate entities.
What would you say the most common mental health concerns you see locally? And do they impact one age group more than others?
That’s answer is so tough for me because there are so many things that people are experiencing. If I could narrow it down, it would be accessing care. I know that sounds weird because you’re asking what brings people to my office. But a lot of time is accessing just care of themselves. Like maybe they’ve neglected their mental health, or maybe they experienced things in childhood they’ve not resolved and it’s coming up in their adult life. If it’s a kid, we don’t have enough mental health providers for kids in our area. We just don’t. Overall, we’re just missing so much and we have so many stressors locally, whether it’s affordable housing or inflation. I mean, it’s hard for me to name a few because what I’m seeing in our practice is that people are getting hit from every angle.
It’s anxiety, trauma, interpersonal conflict, financial stressors, occupational stressors, access to healthcare stressors. I could keep going. Of course, there’s always addiction. But, truthfully, our setting is not the best setting for somebody who is engage in active addiction, but we support a lot of friends, parents, family members and individuals that have a loved one who is going through active addiction.
Do you think that some people just born more happy/less happy than others, or do you think it’s related more to circumstances?
We can always argue nature versus nurture but what I would like to point out, it’s more related to trauma informed care. In that, if we are not taught ways to regulate our central nervous system that usually has an impact over our ability to regulate our emotions. That is kind of what the literature is more pointing to nowadays.
So, to clarify: Traumatic events happen to everyone. Those who have learned to regulate their central nervous system would handle that trauma better, is that what you’re saying?
It’s not so much as handling a situation better. It’s more or less being able to frame the situation differently. For instance, let’s says two people witness the same car accident. One person was taught how to regulate themselves and taught how to de-escalate and self soothe. The other person was not taught that. So one person might be able to calm themselves down effectively after a traumatic event. What they do might be completely different from what the other does to calm their central nervous system after the same traumatic event.
What are some of the ways, positive ways, to regulate your nervous system?
I know you’re looking for concrete answers, but the thing with healthiness or positiveness is that it is subjective. It depends on the person. For you, maybe doing some deep breathing and working on resetting the nervous system is the way. They say that it takes six deep breaths within one minute to regulate your nervous system. But for someone else with breathing issues or health issues, that might throw them into a worse situation. Maybe that person needs to potentially use the five senses. Maybe they need to feel or touch or smell something. Or have a visual picture in their mind and take themselves to the beach or woods. Or maybe they just need to focus on five blue things in the immediate area to help bring them down. Regulating the central nervous system is highly dependent on what works for the individual. Some people use exercise. Now, there could be an argument there that if you experience a traumatic event and go run 10 miles — that it might be overdoing it. There’s always this argument that when regulating your central nervous system — positive could be turned into something else. It’s not one size fits all.
Is it better to learn these things at a younger age or is it learnable as you age?
It’s learnable at any age, so there’s hope in that. Is better to learn this stuff as a kid? Sure, that’s just like learning foreign languages at a younger age. It just sticks with you and becomes easier. As we age we take on so much information it can almost feel burdensome, the more we have to keep changing and adding. The younger you are the better off you will be, but it’s never too late to learn and change.
I guess the irony here is that you don’t really learn it until you have to.
Some people got lucky or privileged that they had someone who knows how to do this and passed it along. Or people say, “This is a coping skill? I’ve always done this.” They never knew that they had a built in coping skill.
Also, with autism spectrum disorder. A lot of those kids and adults have a built-in coping skills with stemming, where they rock or use hand flaps or something else that’s not recognizable to the rest of the population but they have their built in regulation system through stemming.
Do you think that people stress themselves out by feeling that they’re not happy enough? How does social media come into play with that? Does comparing ourselves to others make us miserable?
The way that I view it clinically is that stress is an external factor. Anxiety is internal. So do I think it’s possible that using social media for comparison purposes only could be stress inducing, which leads to anxiety, depression, low self-esteem, maybe even potential trauma, eating disorders. Yes, it’s very possible, especially if there is a missing component of an individual not knowing who they are, knowing what their core beliefs are, understanding the differences of being comfortable with who you are versus comparing yourself. Yeah, I do think it can lead to that.
So the external factor is social media and that causes stress, but the anxiety would be the internal story about what you’re seeing?
Yes.
So do you think our culture in general, social media, movies, TV, everything else, expects us to be happy all the time? Like we feel bad if we’re not happy?
There are subcultures within cultures. There are some terms out there such as toxic positivity. Like #goodvibesonly. In that we are encouraged to only experience positive emotions. And the reality of is that we have to experience all emotions so we know what it feels like to feel good. Because you don’t know what it feels like to feel good or grateful or happy or excited if you don’t know what it feels like to be sad, let down, frustrated or angry. It’s a yin yang approach where we have to have both so that we can really experience true happiness.
Are there any upsides to social media for mental health?
Absolutely. There are a lot of folks putting out helpful content. And there are also some folks putting out misinformation. One of the things we encourage folks to do is to look at your feed. What’s coming up and how are you feeling when it comes up? Is it good to be challenged? Yes. So if there’s some discomfort because of something you’re reading or seeing then that might be healthy. But if what’s coming up for you is shame, guilt, blame, judgement, second guessing who you are as an individual, losing esteem, then that’s not the healthy side of social media. But there are plenty of helpful accounts that are not spouting that toxic positivity of always being positive. There are plenty of accounts that taking a balanced approach. Maybe they’re like “Yeah, I had a terrible day so I’m going to take a walk.” Social media, when it’s balanced, can be really uplifting and really connecting.
So we need to recognize what we’re experiencing and then do something that makes us feel differently?
It’s about the initial recognition – that was awful, that was traumatic, I’m really annoyed. What can I do to no longer feel this way? There is a lot research out there that talks about primary emotions. We use this often in our practice: What you resist, persists. That means the more you delay emotion recognition, the harder it is to actually get rid of that emotion. And you’ll just stay stuck.
So what are some of those tools for coping?
Deep breathing for some folks. Guided meditation. Mindfulness – in a myriad of ways, such as focus on breathing, watching thoughts come and go, checking in with the five senses – what am I tasting, what am I hearing, what am I seeing? Finding support groups.
We love support groups in our practice, and there are a myriad of 12 step groups. For CODA, AA, NA, NARANON, ALANON, ALATEEN, Overeaters Anonymous, Gamblers Anonymous. There are groups for incest survivors, sexual assault survivors. There is a group for everything you could imagine, not all necessarily on the Outer Banks. But with the pandemic access to healthcare has become more available. Might not be directly here, but there is a group somewhere it the world that you can join and be connected to folks.
I would like to say that sometimes the groups that we’re with might actually be the groups that are harming us, and so it’s important to come back to this idea of who am I, what do I believe, and is this community I’m in helping or hurting me? Do I need to seek out a community that understands me or has the same core beliefs that I have?
With mindfulness, meditation, is that for the short-term relief or long-term benefits?
Believe it or not, when you’re in a significant amount of stress and trauma and disregulation, doing mindfulness or meditation really isn’t helpful. So doing meditation and mindfulness is more like a daily practice, just like a walk or coffee. It has to become adopted into the daily practice to help maintain your central nervous from becoming activated.
When stuff hits the fan, here are some things to decide. One: Do I need to talk to somebody? Do I need the assistance of friend, a family member, a crisis contact, something like that? Two: Do I need to walk away from situation? Do you need to say I can’t do this right now, I’ll be back. Do I need to take some time, go for a walk, do some breathing. Dip your hands into ice water. I’m all over the map with these coping skills, but what works for one might not work for another.
What are the benefits of mindfulness and meditation?
It can lower your heart rate, it can really help with impulse control, it can help with emotion recognition, emotion regulation, it can assist with deactivating that central nervous system. There are so many benefits to mindfulness and meditation. The research is just staggering. It can even reduce chronic pain.
My advice is don’t give up. That’s what we hear a lot. People get frustrated. They try it and attempt to do it and give up. Just starting, even with two minutes of meditation a day and working your way up is beneficial. There’s no way to fail at meditation, and I think a lot people believe that there is but there’s not.
How do our own thoughts contribute to our well-being? What do you think about the notion that you can change your thoughts?
For some people it’s more difficult than others. It has to do with stories we tell ourselves about our life. The things that we believe about ourselves and the world and how we see ourselves in the world. Once you become clear about you are and how you see the world, changing your thoughts becomes, I don’t want to say easy, but it becomes more manageable. It doesn’t seem like chore as it does when you first start.
Please say a little bit about the behavioral aspects of mental health. Are there healthier habits people can adopt that would make them more mentally stable?
We as human beings because of all of our life experiences come up with coping skills. Sometimes they’re the best things for us, and other times they’re not. Sometimes what may have been healthy for us 5, 10, 20 years ago is no longer healthy for us. Yes, there is hope; you can always change.
So because it’s so subjective, you can’t really say what habits people should go out and pick up?
Yes, to me that is the most hypocritical thing that I could do, is tell somebody how they could make their life better. My job as a therapist is to hear you and listen to you about what’s not working and help you understand who you are so that you and I can problem solve together. And eventually you won’t need me and you can problem solve on your own.
We’ve all been hearing about suicides and overdoses in the past few years. If someone is worried about a friend or family member, what should they look for? What should parents look for? Or what can kids look for with their friends?
First and foremost, I was in a meeting today with Dr. Evan Askins of the UNC Fit Program. He was telling us that the reason we’re seeing more overdoes is because the substances that people are using are more contaminated with fentanyl. There used to be a culture of recreational drug users or party using or social use, and that can’t be a thing any more because you just don’t know what you’re going to get anymore, and more often than not things are contaminated. That is why we are seeing such a large increase in overdoses.
As far as substance use is concerned, when someone starts to disconnect socially, when they stop doing things they used to enjoy doing, when communication becomes like a chore, when a parent is left second guessing themselves after having a conversation – that might be an indication that substance use is involved. Impulse control. With suicidal folks. If you’re noticing someone act impulsively in certain areas of their lives, that might be an indication that something is going wrong. Isolation. It’s important to note that self-injurious behavior is not always an indicator of suicidality, however, self injurious behaviors are concerning in that you could do something wrong one time and then it’s light out. It is a concerning behavior. Self hatred. How is the person talking about themselves? Are they always downing themselves Are they using humor in a self-deprecating way, making themselves the butt end of jokes.
One thing I want to say is that it never hurts to ask someone how they’re doing. There’s this misperception that if you have someone how they’re doing and they’re not doing well, they’re going to harm themselves and that couldn’t be further from the truth. From the professional trainings I’ve attended, the message is clear: People do not kill themselves because someone asks “Are you OK? I’m worried about you. How is your mental health?”
If you are a person that someone reaches out to for help, or says “I’m not doing well,” what are some tips?
So the number one tip is Do not try to fix the situation. Say “I’m here for you. I will listen.” Say “Do you want me to call around and help you find someone to talk to?” Because that can be a very difficult thing when you are hurting.
As I said, access to care is limited. When you finally get up the courage to ask for help and a practice doesn’t call you back or says, “Sorry we’re full,” that can be detrimental. If you’re somebody who cares for someone who’s having a hard time, offer to make phone calls. See who’s taking new people. You don’t have to make the appointment, but you can say these are some places I found.
If they don’t want to do therapy, ask if they want you to go to 12-step meeting or a listening circle with them. Ask if they would like to join you at a yoga or meditation class?
Don’t try to fix and then offer help with finding professional help or peer help.
Is there anything else you want to make sure we cover?
I just want to say that there is no one right way to be mentally well. It’s really going to vary depending on what works for individuals. Someone doesn’t have to give up their individualism to be well. I am never the authority on someone else. For me mental health is so collaborative.
__________________________________________________________
HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT?
Chief Marilyn Berry Morrison discusses the struggle to get official recognition for our Indigenous tribes.
From federal parks to symphonic dramas, local history buffs keep missing the point. The most pressing question isn’t where did the so-called “Lost Colony” go; it’s what happened to the Indigenous peoples who first welcomed them ashore?
“We were never gone,” says Marilyn Berry Morrison, chief of the Roanoke-Hatteras Indians and chair of the Algonquian Indians of North Carolina, Incorporated, Council. “We are still here today. Our family still lives right on this island.”
Not according to the powers that be. The federal government currently recognizes only one Indigenous tribe in North Carolina, which is the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians. And the state only recognizes that tribe, plus seven more — Cohaire Intra-Tribal Council, Inc., Haliwa-Saponi Indian Tribe, Lumbee Tribe, Meherrin Nation, Occaneechi Band of the Saponi Nation, Sappony, and Waccamaw-Siouan.
Morrison, 72, has been leading efforts to add the Roanoke-Hatteras Indians to the list since before her election in 2003. Clearly, it’s not easy. The NC Commission of Indian Affairs requires that any tribe must be able to trace their origins beyond 1790, among other criteria.
For centuries, America’s treatment of Native peoples was designed to eliminate them, using tactics that ranged from outright war to political subterfuge.
“For years, there was no place for Native Americans or American Indians [on the Census] and so they told us we were Black,” Morrison explains. “They tried to kill us on paper. But Native pride continued to rise; we held onto what little we remember.”
Now, Morrison is working to reinvigorate the Outer Banks’ Indigenous identity. She’s encouraging local families of color to revisit their roots while asking the community to celebrate our collective history. (The public’s invited to a Manteo powwow the second week of August.) Meanwhile, she works tirelessly to see that federal and state agencies finally recognize the first peoples Europeans ever met.
We sat down with Chief Morrison to get more insight on our indigenous peoples’ ongoing struggle — and enduring history.
For more on the August powwow — or to learn how you can help the Roanoke-Hatteras Indians achieve recognition— go to NCAlgonquians.com. Also, any state officials or groups are invited to mail statements of support to: North Carolina Commission of Indian Affairs, 1317 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1317.
The following interview was conducted by Corinne Saunders on Mar. 20, 2022. An abridged version appears in Milepost Issue 11.2, and was published summer 2022.
OUTER BANKS MILEPOST: What is your title?
MARILYN BERRY MORRISON: I am the chief of the Roanoke-Hatteras Indians and the chairman of the Algonquian Indians of North Carolina, Incorporated, Council.
And what exactly is the Roanoke-Hatteras Tribe of the Algonquian Indians of North Carolina?
The Algonquian Indians of North Carolina, Incorporated, was a council that we were encouraged to reunite by Dr. David Phelps, who was a professor at the East Carolina University, and when he asked us to go on and reorganize, and that’s because he had been looking for us for so many years when he came across some of our family, he was excited and we were excited and then he just said, well, let’s do it. So we reorganized in 2003, and by the union of two historic tribes, one being the Roanoke-Hatteras Indians of Dare County, and the other is the Mattamuskeet Indians of Hyde County. We are known as the people of the coast, and we are part of a group of Indians known as the Carolina Algonquians. This name represented our language group, our linguistic group. And we’re the southernmost speakers of the Eastern Algonquian language that went from the Neuse River in North Carolina to the maritime provinces in Canada. And it was the Algonquian-speaking people who took the brunt of the English exploration and colonization, beginning at Roanoke Island in 1584, continuing to Jamestown and Plymouth and all the succeeding colonies along the mid-Atlantic and the northeastern coast of North America. So, we, if you really have to understand the culture, Native American culture, because we have nations and we have tribes and we have bands. So, our linguistics style, our nation, would be Algonquian, and under that we have a tribe or band, and we use these terms interchangeably. So we’re the Roanoke-Hatteras Indian Tribe, or we could be a band as well. Now one thing that we’ve found was that we have not always been called Hatteras, we were originally the Croatoan, and we haven’t found anything that substantiates why the name was changed from Croatoan to Hatteras, but we know it happened in the early 1700s.
How long have you been the chief?
I have been the chief since 2003.
And how did that happen?
Once we reorganized, we had a meeting and they elected me as chief, and so here I am.
And who was they?
When we were told to try and reorganize, we had to go out and locate members of our family and we’re proud to say that our membership is strictly by bloodline and so each of us had to prove who we are, and that was doing various ancestral charts and attaching, you know, Census records to show who our relatives were, who our parents were, grandparents, great-grandparents, and on some of the branches of our family tree we’ve been able to go back 11 or 12 generations, ok? So we are very prideful, uh, very proud of being able to document that.
Right. And who was the chief before you?
Now, because there were just a few families on Roanoke Island, it’s my guess that it was an elder, one who was respected, and it appears that in each generation there was one that stood out, such like Mark Scarborough from Hatteras, he was the Hatteras Indian, and then you had Joseph Hall Berry, who was Roanoke, and it seemed like everybody looked to them for guidance.
So it was kind of unofficial? Right, right. And they, but they were well respected and they led the community. In fact it appears that they were the starters, the go-getters. I know that Mark Scarborough, he advocated education, and he started, he was one of the commissioners of the school over in Buxton, Buxton School Number 2, until it closed in 1894. And then he moved from Hatteras to Roanoke Island because he wanted his children to have an education. Joseph Hall Berry, the same thing. Education was very important to both of them, and, uh, Joseph Hall Berry also started our legacy at Pea Island. Another one that stands out is Spencer Bowser, as well. And later in years, um, Josephus Berry, um, was also well respected and people always came to him for guidance as to what we needed to do, and he had no problem calling a group together to try and resolve you know, whatever the concern would be, yes.
Is this effectively the same tribe that the Lost Colony would’ve had contact with?
I would say yes, as described in early transcripts, they referred to our people as tall, tawny, bronze people standing on the shore. And um, when I read that, I said well that sounds like me. Then it went back to state that Manteo’s wife was sitting on the shore and she called some braves to go out and bring the Europeans into shore. We washed their clothes, we fed them and made them welcome and then in return, um, they beheaded our chief, Chief Wingina. Some of this I was happy to find that what we had heard, I guess you might call it, refer to it as being family lore, but little bits and pieces, but then when you actually read the transcript, it matches up, so it’s the truth. They beheaded our chief, Chief Wingina, and uh, then the tribe began to disband and move to other tribes, and I guess that’s how we get this connection with Mattamuskeet because the tribal members went from one land to the other. Roanoke used to be the hunting grounds and Croatoan, the fishing grounds, ok? And you know, the culture is that we would only take what we needed to survive, and having these Europeans here, it helped deplenish our supply that we had already put away for the winter. And so when the Europeans came, everyone didn’t take to them…our mistrust. and Manteo thought they were the best thing that happened and they in turn made him uh, the Lord of Roanoke, but other natives said they don’t mean us any good and we have to come up with a way to get rid of them. So we had our concerns, um and stories that we’ve been told regarding the lost colony, but we won’t go there.
What does “recognized” mean for the tribe?
Ok. It’s really state recognized or federal recognition when you speak of that. State tribal recognition uh, does not confer the same benefits as federally recognized. It actually acknowledges tribal status within the state but does not guarantee funding from the state or federal government. State recognized tribes are not necessarily federally recognized. (Sure.) You have some federally recognized tribes that are also recognized by the state, so the main thing is that you have to understand is that tribes who seek state recognition seek it because we want to acknowledge our historical and cultural contributions. Our culture has fallen through the cracks. The tribes have been able to get state recognition and now thanks to Dr. Phelps and David Stick and Elean (Helen?) Rountree and Karen Cooperman all of these have found tidbits and so now we’ve got to put the dots together because we have a culture and a history that shows that we were contributors as well, and because of that we are seeking state recognition; we want it now.
And why aren’t you recognized today?
Well, I guess I also should have also stated that the North Carolina Commission of Indian Affairs provides education and technical service, or, technical assistance, to tribes and the state statute authorizes the commission to legally recognize tribes and define the procedure for doing so. However, that does not hold true in all states, so it’s almost like the state officials or state department has passed that responsibility onto the North Carolina Commission of Indian Affairs but only ..i’m hearing that that may change but i haven’t seen anything yet that you can quote that. And you asked why aren’t we recognized today? (Right) Ok. It’s a very lengthy process and we’re just waiting our turn. We have been informed that we’re up next for the review. There’s a panel that reviews these applications for state recognition and I’m told that they’re representatives from various state recognized tribes and also other researchers, and so, we are working diligently trying to polish off our application and make sure all the information and documentation that they are requesting is attached.
So you have any idea when they’ll be reviewing it? Um, no, because once we submit it, it’s still I guess a waiting period, I think it must be based upon when they actually hold their meetings and because of the pandemic I’m quite sure there’s going to be more of a delay because they’re not really in their offices or…we’re just using this time to make sure all of our information is in place.
At what point was the tribe considered “gone?” Clearly you didn’t disappear (at least not literally).
We were never gone, we are still here today. We were there then, and our family still lives right on this island. They never left. We’ve always known who we are and too much power I should say was given to the Census-taker so it appears that the Census-taker was left with the decision of trying to determine who we are, what is he or she supposed to call us. And that is what they put on these Census records. And the codes that they used at that time you only had two categories, Black or white. There was no place for Native Amerians or American Indians and so they told us we were Black and we believed them. We believed them because somewhat there is still fear in us because if you were Native American, frequently your rations were cut, so if you were hungry, you said whatever was going to put some food on your table and in your stomach. Same thing happened with the military, because jobs were not plentiful in that area, in the Outer Banks area, you’ll find that many of the young guys, the young men, went into the military, but they were not allowed to enlist unless they said that they were Black, and they have always known that they were American Indian, but to have a better life, they lied. I look back at all the research I’ve done and it just appears that they killed us on paper. It’s nothing but paper genocide because they wrote what they wanted to write.
How long have you been trying to turn it around?
Since before 2003.
And why is it taking so long?
Because, in personal experience, I find that family members are still in fear of some sort, and they also remain in denial, um, and maybe they just don’t understand why it’s important for them to accept who they really are, how they can benefit from it, I guess they’re looking for something. But mainly it’s fear because you have to think about during that time if you claimed that you were Indian then frequently your children were carted off and sent to boarding schools or you were sent to a reservation. You were treated less than a third-class citizen, and so people feared this. The fear of my people was tremendously impacted by the statement of [former President Theodore] Roosevelt in a speech in New York, January 1886. He stated that the only good Indians are the dead Indians. In 1901, he became the 26th president of the United States. And so after 20 years of living in fear, then that generation just accepted that they were Black and then they told their children they were Black and then they told the next generation they were Black, and so it just got lost, I would think. But when you have family gatherings, we know who we are. You’re free to speak about it.
What are the benefits of being recognized?
Well, being recognized, we would be eligible for membership on the Commission of Indian Affairs and hopefully be able to help other groups such as ours to get their state recognition. Another benefit is possible program funding for the community and, most importantly, if we get state recognition, we are going to be able to secure our rightful place in history as the Roanoke-Hatteras Indians.
What are the drawbacks, if there are any?
I’m not certain there are any drawbacks but regardless, whether or not we are approved for state recognition, it does not change who we are. When we look in the mirror each morning, we’ll still see Roanoke-Hatteras Indian or Mattumuskeet Indian. That’s never going to change. We are who we are and we know it, and so we need to help others realize who they are and know their true identity.
How has the rise of DNA test change things (ie. Some people are seeking to get tribal recognition in hopes of payouts? Does that make decision makers suspicious?)
I’m not aware of any payouts, and very few tribes recognize DNA. And the reason that’s so is that you don’t have enough tribal members on the East Coast who have added blood samples to establish true DNA for East Coast tribes. So when someone has DNA, it’s not really being compared to the East Coast Natives; it’s West Coast Natives. And so your information is kind of skewed the wrong way. DNA really doesn’t tell you what tribe you belong to; it just tells you who may possibly be a relative.
How has history made it harder? (For centuries being Indigenous was potentially dangerous –at the very least problematic).
I feel we were forced into the “colored” status. Once again, they tried to kill us on paper, but Native pride continued to rise, we held onto what little we remember. Because at that time, as I explained earlier, it was fatal being an American Indian. You could only be Black or white and collectors? sysematically altered Indian birth certificates, death certificates and marriage certificates to read “colored” or “Negro.” At this time no one could claim Native American and if they did, they’d be labeled as mulatto or Black by that state. So I guess you could say over the years, they tried to come up with some…and the they, Census takers and whoever else worked with flecker?? And they started out calling us Black, then you became colored, then the next season you became mulatto, the next season, um let’s say it was James Brown’s era, “I’m Black and I’m proud” you were back to being Black, and one was a capital B and the other was a lowercase b for black and they meant a little different. Um, then they started calling you Negro and then now it went back to colored, I mean it just went from one thing to the other. They didn’t know what to call us. The Europeans came over, they mixed with us and they came up with a group of people that they didn’t know what to call us. And this mixing was just supposed to be for a short time. It’s my understanding that in Europe there were numerous children that were born with birth defects, and when the early Europeans saw this strong acute? beings on the North American continent, they felt that if they mixed, it would strengthen their race. But I guess they got a little too happy with it and went…I mean they just went overboard with mixing, and it got out of control. And you also have to understand that if they erased us from the records, their aim was to either exhaust us through the different wars, because they caused a lot of conflict, and for those individuals who were killed during the war, they killed off the title to the land, so they were able to seize our land, then sent us off as slaves to distant countries. So that’s how they removed us another way. Now, it comes to mind, in the Civil War period, anyone that was declared Black or mulatto was subject to severe civil deprivation including enslavement, ok, but then you had this Virginia Racial Integrity Law of 1924 that continued to acknowledge only the white and Black race. And today we’re still fighting for justice, so I guess this is history repeating itself.
You were told not to talk about it growing up. When did you find out? Was it an internal secret? Or something you discovered and hid?
In my family I won’t say it was a secret because they spoke freely about it, but I thought about this, and I think I was maybe about 6 or 7 years old when I was sitting on my grandmother’s porch and I saw this group of Indians riding by on horseback, and I asked her, “Who are those people?,” and she said, “We’re not going to talk about them.” But it was like a moment of reverence, because everybody just remained quiet and they allowed those riders to pass by the house. So I never understood because I didn’t know what to ask, but I know you’re supposed to be quiet as they ride by and just look on. But in later years, I feel that that was a moment of us giving them honor for holding onto the culture. Many things went through my mind; was there regret for them, for my grandmother, not being as bold as they were? But you have to also understand that there was a reservation over in Hatteras and it appeared that they were coming from that Hatteras village going up toward Fort Raleigh. So no, it wasn’t an internal secret…because it had a tremendous impact on survival.
So you always knew you were Indigenous?
Yes.
Did you grow up practicing any of the Indigenous ways?
I’d say for me, it was mainly herbal remedies, because in Manteo years ago, they had to go all the way over to Currituck to Dr. Wright’s office. You had to depend on whatever you had in your cabinet to cure whatever, because having to go that far, walk, ride, whatever, you’d be dead by the time you get over there. So you had a lot of midwives and medicine women in the community. Uh, Rose Tillett was one that I’m told. She had a whole room, well, pantry, of different herbs, and she could heal anything. But I’m also told that because she lost a child at childbirth, the mother was giving childbirth, uh, the father ended up killing her because he lost his child. So that was a valuable person in the community who lost her life needlessly, and the death of the child was not really her fault.
I look back at pictures, and my dad continued to trap for muskrats, we thought it was, he was just joking about going to catch rats, but we actually have a picture of him with his catch of all these muskrats. Hunting continued, fishing, we are a fishing family, um one of my cousins is, he continues to, well before he passed, he continued to hunt deer and bear. We continued making nets. My grandfather continued the custom of fishing. We cured our meats, we cured our fish, I don’t know if you’ve heard of salt fish. My grandmother canned, and she also made us go pick the berries for her to can, and we spent a many a day along Highway 12 picking strawberries. Also, I know that we held onto the practices because I recently purchase a book called The Mullet Roar by William C. Brown, and in it um he describes the trapping that was taught to him, and he was taught by my grandfather, Josephus C. Berry, who was a commercial fisherman. And we referred to, or we called William, we called him Billy Brown. I think his father was a local photographer. But it just affirmed that he had learned a number of our customs and traditions from my grandfather. He also knew that my grandfather read the winds and read the clouds in order to decide whether they were going to go fishing or how far, you know. So he learned some of those customs as well. And I may be repeating myself, Billy Brown was my granddaddy’s first mate.
You’ve touched on this. Discuss the blurred lines between Black and Native ancestry. Why did so many Native residents “get lost?” Did they prefer to identify as Black? Or was it the Census that did that? Or Both?
Well, there was no preference. We had no choice. The Census taker called us what he or she thought we were, and we accorded. We were either Black or white. You weren’t coded American Indian or Native American. In some counties, I’m told that they also used the brown paper bag test, and they took a brown paper bag and they held it beside your skin, and if you were lighter then you were white, but if you were darker, then you were Black. They also used what they called the comb test. They took the comb through your hair, and if you got caught then that meant you had nappy or kinky hair, so you were Black. If it went straight through and you had silky hair, then they coded you as white.
Wow. What are some noteworthy stories from your past that modern Outer Bankers may not recognize?
The story about Mark Scarborough. Mark Scarborough was a Hatteras Indian, and he was the last yaupon tea harvester. And he also served on the board of commission for that School Number 2 in Buxton. And when the school closed, he broke down his house, he put it on a boat, and he sailed from Hatteras to Roanoke Island. He really rebuilt the house. I’m told also that one of his sons married and the son and…the two wives of the two sons couldn’t get along, and he got tired of them arguing, so he tore the house down again, packed it up and he moved it I guess up the road or down the road. But anyway his house still stands and one of my cousins lived in it over near Wescott Park on Driftwood Drive. So I thought that was very unusual.
Another one is Annie Mariah Simmons Pugh. She was bold, she was strong, and she was my great-great-grandmother. And her picture, her photograph, excuse me, her portrait is now in the repository of the what’s it called the National Museum of [the American Indian]. And why that stands out because Frank Speck, an ethnologist from the Smithsonian came down and he interviewed her and took these pictures. She also gave him a necklace, and this shell necklace is in our possession, our tribe’s possession. It was returned to us by the Seminole Indians of Florida, and it was part of the Frank Speck collection. We have the authenticity paperwork to prove that it is authentic, but we just were so amazed that after all these years we are able to reunite Grandma Annie’s pictures with her necklace.
Another is the story of Ben Golden or Ben Tillett. He assisted [Union] General [Ambrose] Burnside in being victorious in the North Carolina Battle on the Croatan [Battle of Roanoke Island]. In fact, if you are a local, you know that there’s a drop out there in the Croatan [Sound], and locals will tell you dont swim out far, because you get caught in the undertow, and it’s been there for years. So when Uncle Ben was with General Burnside, he told him, “Let me tell you when to fire.” And so…as the enemy was approaching, he said don’t fire yet, let them come a little bit closer, and they thought they could step right out and walk to land, but when they stepped out, he said, “Fire.” They fell into that drop out there in the Croatan, and General Burnside was known as being victorious for that particular battle.
Oh, Civil War, right!
And I know my granny Cora Tillet Scarborough would always say when it rained, the blood from all the people who had been killed during the war, the blood would rise just off of the ground. And she had me so scared, I didn’t want to walk down the street because I don’t know, I was thinking I might see a ghost, I don’t know. But I never walked, she would make it sound so scary, “When the blood rises up from the ground,” yes.
And then Zion Hall Berry, who founded Haven Creek Baptist Church in Manteo, along with seven other churches in the East Coast of North Carolina. And I’m told that church history indicates that the women sewed a message in their quilts and they hung the quilts across the fence. And as passerbys gazed at the quilts, they read the plan of escape, which read, “When you cross the creek,” which was the Croatan Sound, “You’ll find sweet haven.” Sweet haven was Haven Creek Baptist Church. So he was instrumental in helping the slaves escape into freedom.
Joseph Hall Berry, he wrote a letter to [former First Lady] Eleanor Roosevelt July 6, 1939, asking that the Pea Island [Life-Saving] Station, an all-colored crew, not be placed under white command. And that’s because they had made a complete turnaround with the work that the Pea Island crew, that station, was doing. They had a very high success rate and they just did not want someone in, someone on the outside coming in, taking over and getting credit for it. So I’m quite sure it was acknowledged because I know no white commander came in after Richard Etheridge [the first Black keeper of a life-saving station]. One of them, the officers in charge, was my great-uncle Maxie M. Berry, who was the last officer in charge at the Pea Island Station when it was decommissioned in 1949. I also zeroed in that when my great-grandfather Joseph Hall Berry wrote this letter, he referred to the men as the all-colored crew, not all-Black crew, and then I went through the Census records. Theodore Meekins was mulatto, Benjamin Bowser was mulatto, Darmin Pugh was mulatto, and all of them, or each of them, is one of my relatives. So I just don’t understand, I don’t have any problem with being Black, but I just want to make sure everything is right. We are proud to say that Joseph Hall Berry started our legacy at the Pea Island Life-Saving Station and we now have over 420 combined years of service in the life-saving station and the U.S. Coast Guard.
Josephus C. Berry, my grandfather, it’s a very interesting story as to how he acquired his fishing vessel, the Phyllis Mae. He was also the first captain of color that was granted that title [captain] as a commercial fisherman. Also he was owner of the Ella View, which is in downtown Manteo at the Creef Boat Museum and that has a lot of history. It’s over 150 years old. I wish they would put it on the inside to preserve it forever, but um, that’s another project. It’s a shad boat but it also I think served in the Civil War as well, so they had to patrol the shores for the enemies and they ended up using vessels of their own because they didn’t have the supplies like we have today.
My mother, Cora Lee Golden Berry, was a local from Manteo and she was the first person of color and teacher to integrate schools in Elizabeth City, North Carolina.
My cousin Ralph C. Berry was the first person of color in 1979 to graduate from the Navy Diver and Salvage Center in Panama City. It was a diver school and he was just recently honored by the U.S. Coast Guard for his accomplishment.
Those are just a few. I don’t want to bore you, but those are just a few I think are worthy of being noted.
Can you spell your mother’s name? And your great-great grandmother’s name?
Cora Lee Golden Berry.
Annie Mariah Simmons Pugh.
Annie was also the granddaughter of Israel Pierce, Pungo Indian. Annie would get fighting mad if you called her anything else than a Pungo Indian because she came from the Pungo River area. She married Smith Pugh, who was a Hatteras Indian, but she let you know she wasn’t Hatteras, she was Pungo.
And who was her father?
Her father was Asa Simmons, and her mother was Elizabeth Pugh, who was the daughter of Israel Pierce, the Pungo Indian.
And who did she marry?
Annie married Smith Pugh, and he was a Hatteras Indian.
And then Mark Scarborough, could you spell his name?
His father was Peter Gordon, and if I remember correctly his mother was Mary Scarborough. I found her on court records because she took him to court for child support.
How do you spell his name?
Mark Scarborough. He was also one of the first to sign up for the infantry for the Civil War.
Ok.
And we have a project, I don’t know where we’re going to go with it now. In 2015, there was another researcher who found his grave off of Driftwood Drive in Manteo, and someone has just desecrated that small cemetery. There are tree logs have been dumped over there and the overgrowth has just taken over. And so I’m hoping that someone will help us clear that off because 11 people are buried there. But that’s the grave of Mark Scarborough. I’m hoping we can get a roadmark sign for his contributions to the community, so that’s up-and-coming.
And you touched on this; who are some of the more noteworthy members of the past 100 years or more, such as the Pea Island crew members?
I’ll go back to Joseph Hall Berry, who started our legacy for the all-colored crew, and the men who served under Richard Etheridge, who participated in the heroic lifesaving rescue of the nine members of the E.S. Newman back in 1896 when there was a hurricane, and they were not awarded for their efforts until 1996. And those are my relatives Benjamin Bowser, Darmon Pugh, Theodore Meekins and Lewis Wescott. And I’m still trying to find connections for Stanley Wise and William Irving, who were amongst the six.
Could you spell their names?
Darmon Pugh. Benjamin Bowser. Theodore Meekins. Lewis Wescott. And the other two gentlemen are Stanley Wise and William Irving.
So the last two, you’re still trying to find a connection for?
Well, I’m trying to see if we are connected to them, and it would be distance, because Stanley Wise married a great-great-uncle’s daughter. That’s how far back ago it was. You have to understand, everything was kept in the family. There were very few people on the island; about 80 families, so I’m told, and then they had a migration of slaves that boost the numbers up to 2 or 3,000. And then there wasn’t enough rations to go around, so they gave those slaves and opportunity to leave for a better life, so they did. So the numbers dwindled down once again.
So how do you interact with other tribes?
We’ve interacted more with the southern coastal tribes of Virginia, and that hasn’t just been recent, but if you look at history, we were the ones back during that time, because you have the Chesapeake Indians who we worked with—the Nansemund—and we still support them today, [along with] the Nottoway, the Chereonhoka, the Meherrin [of North Carolina], [and] the Chowanoke [of North Carolina]. We support them with any sponsored event, and we also attend their powwows. And we just pull together and give presentations. In fact I have one coming up at the end of this month [March], at the College of the Albemarle in Edenton, and so we’ll be working together with some other tribal members from other tribes. But we just get together and we share our history, our culture, our heritage, because we want to make sure we create visibility as well as to make sure people are aware of our existence.
So you interact more with the southern Virginian tribes than with the North Carolina tribes?
Yes, because they are closer.
Right. And what’s your plan moving forward?
Our plan moving forward is to finalize this state recognition application and try to obtain state recognition. And we feel that this will help our people with housing and land conservation and scholarships for our children. That’s one of our long-term goals. And we also want to continue to tell our story because it’s gone untold far too long, and we would like to purchase land so that we can have a space to host our powwows because every year it becomes problematic and we just don’t like to keep moving from one place to another. But we want to have a piece of land that we can either, we can have our powwows as well as possibly establishing a culture center.
So that would ideally be in Manteo?
Yes.
And what’s your long-term vision?
Long-term vision is to obtain state recognition. We’ve already applied for federal recognition, so that we can be grandfathered in. And then once we get state recognition, we are hoping that we will be able to help our people with housing and preserve the land, and get some scholarships for our children. Because education is most important.
When did you apply for federal recognition?
That was between 2003 and 2005.
And you just haven’t heard back yet?
At that time there was like 170-some tribes ahead of us. And no, we have not heard back from them yet, but we are in the mix to be reviewed. So while that one is being worked on, we work on the state, before the rules change.
Is there anything else?
We would like to solicit letters of support from local officials and community organizations as we move forward with our application for state recognition. And we need voices, because we know who we are. Records speak for itself, and most importantly, we never left. We are also hoping that groups will be able to partner with us, possibly vend, be vendors at our annual powwow, and just let it be a good sharing time to enlighten the community. And we have, our date is still pending because of pandemic concerns. We are hearing that a number of the tribes have had to scale back to a one-day event. Usually it’s a weekend, and because of pandemic concerns, many of them are scaling back to just a one-day festival.
But you think it will happen in August, just date to be determined?
Yes, yes, and I hate to put it out there, our weekend is the second weekend in August, the 13 and 14.
And you’re just not sure if it will be two days or one?
Right. Right.
And the location is to be determined as well?
Yes, we reserved a place, it is to be determined, because it may change. If it goes to one day, we may have to take it someplace else. But we want to make sure it’s in Manteo. I think it makes it more meaningful, rather than take it over on the Outer Banks, because it would be more meaningful right there in Manteo. I mean Festival Park would be ideal if they world work with us.
Alright. And if anyone had a letter of support, what would be the best address for you? Would it be email?
No, it would go to the North Carolina Commission of Indian Affairs. The address is 1317 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1317.
So local organizations and elected officials could just write a letter and just mail it there to support you all?
Right, that is correct. Support us in gaining state recognition because we are who we are. We have letters from Former Senator Basnight, Former Governor Beverly Purdue, former Representative William Culpepper and the Eastern Band of Cherokees along with some letters from the Eastern Band of Cherokees, but this process has been so long we would like to in addition to have their letters from some of the recent or the current officers to show their support. Just like Senator Marc Basnight was very close to our family, and in his letter he spoke of the old Berry homestead that’s right across the street from the new courthouse, on Berry Lane, Berry Drive, excuse me. He attested that it’s over 100 years old, and that’s the same home of Joseph Hall Berry. I was hoping that the historical society could possibly renovate it. They have homes of Malloyd Scarborough and William Simmons on Sir Raleigh Street because of their service to Pea Island, they came under the historical society, whatever they call it. So I’m hoping that something like that will materialize before it gets too far gone.
And how long have you been working on your state recognition?
Since 2003. And the most recent tribe that received a review was the Tuscarora, and I think they received their review like fall 2021 and then when they, the committee finished them, we received word that we were up next. It’s a lot of paper and a lot of…
A lot of paper and a lot of what?
Copies, because you have to make packs for each reviewer. And if anybody wanted to look at the cemetery, if they wanted to identify the Scarborough Cemetery, the address is 1006 Driftwood Road, Manteo outside. And it was Dawn Taylor who found his grave in 2015.
Alright. Well thank you for all your help!
You’re quite welcome. It was my pleasure to serve, as always. – Corinne Saunders
_______________________________________________________________
Two Outer Banks stereotypes never change. One: we’re community minded as all get out. (See backyard benefits and GoFundMe’s to help locals in need.) Two: we’re slack AF.
At least when it comes to volunteering free time to tackle systemic crises before they happen.
Just ask David Stick. Forty years ago, the local leader realized that, when it came to activism, “a small cadre of hard-working and forward-thinking individuals seemed to be involved in just about every project…[and] that every time there was a new problem…a new organizational structure [had] to address it.”
So, in 1982, he rallied a crew of equally committed individuals to form the Outer Banks Community Foundation. (You can find that full origin story on page 8.) The idea was to create a way for local philanthropists to give back to the community. Not just by soliciting endowments and bequests from wealthy bigwigs — but encouraging everyday residents to donate to favorite causes.
“Any one of the founders could’ve stated private endowment,” says recently hired OBCF President and CEO Chris Sawin. “But it was very important to the founders to involve the entire community. That includes not only donors from every economic background — from folks with modest means to those who are more able to give — but it also includes the recipients. They wanted to include everyone.”
Four decades later, the non-profit boasts more than 200 funds worth $25 million and has distributed $12 million in grants, scholarships and disaster relief, supporting everything from arts programs to environmental groups, and tackling issues from food insecurity to feral felines. Moreover, they’ve emerged as a guiding force and network link for other area non-profits. Putting donors together with causes, providing training for local charities, and rallying the public in times of need — be it a landfalling storm or a global pandemic.
“So far, we’ve distributed $350,000 to help with issues related to COVID,” says Sawin. “And we raised $1.5 million for Dorian recovery.”
It’s that combination of community awareness, long-term connections and quick action that’s kept them successful since day one. We sat down with Chris Sawin, Scholarship Administrator Nandy Stuart, Development and Communications Manager MaryAnn Toboz, and Grants Administrator Scout Schillings to find out how the funds work, who all can get involved — and what the next forty years of community stewardship looks like. — Matt Walker
The following is the transcript of our interview with OBCF staff took place in Dec. of 2021, plus a follow up conversation with Chris Sawin that came shortly after. The two were combined and edited for the Spring 2022 issue.
MILEPOST: How did the community foundation start? And what prompted it?
CHRIS SAWIN: Well, I’m learning this as I go along, but my understanding is that it was David Stick’s idea. He kept it under wraps and kind of shrouded in a little suspense and mystery, but he reached out to three main individuals one-by-one: George Crocker, Eddie Green and Andy Griffith. They’re considered the founders, but others were involved, as well. Martin Kellogg took care of the legal issues to create a community foundation, because they have a specific structure. And Jack Adams, who was the only CPA on the Outer Banks in the mid to late 60s, he managed the financial aspects. Ray White was there at the beginning, too. But the first outreach people included Wally McGowen and Casher Evans, and several other folks. And they basically split the Outer Banks into these teams — one for Roanoke Island, one for the Northern Beaches, and one for Hatteras island. And they began the process of fundraising. That happened after an honest-to-God press conference — which we don’t that here then. You might be able to pull that off in Norfolk, maybe, but at the time we didn’t do that here. But there was a feel of, “I’m gonna go see what this hub-bub’s about.” Because it was teased in the media, “There will be a grand announcement.” But David Stick choreographed it. And when you look at 1982 — which was the year I I graduated high school — it was a real inflection point. When I moved down here in 1974, the only restaurant that wasn’t locally owned was the Pizza Hut. And from that time ‘til 1982, we went from like10,000 residents to – I don’t know – the mid teens. And in 1982 things exploded. I don’t know if David stick sensed that, but I know he sensed the fact that there was a looming, growing collection of community needs that weren’t maybe present 15 years before. Growing pains. And if you read the statement that David Stick made, he wrote this letter that basically laid it out.
MARYANN TOBOZ: It was a memoir, basically, on how-and-why the community foundation started, so what was the need, what was the research he did, how did he get people interested, what were the first meetings, and how he laid the groundwork. But the first annual report says, “this has been an auspicious beginning, that 100 people volunteered to solicit memberships.” Because we’re a membership organization. But the organization was very grassroots back in the beginning.
CS: That was a big decision back then. They weighed that carefully, on what would make it work, and membership was the answer
When you look at the beginning, there’s a whole crew of iconic figures involved. And they’d all already contributed to the community. And it’s almost a cliché how giving this community is in general — there’s a benefit every week. And I’m sure it was like that prior to 1982. So I can see these people saying, “We need to put a structure around this inherent desire.” And it makes sense they were the figures to do it.
CS: And I think any one of them could’ve created a family fund or a private foundation. But there’s something about community foundations that emphasizes giving at every income level and every ability. And it really focuses on a broad array of needs. We’re lucky to be a peer of a couple of different groups, and we all get invited to participate in different meetings of the North Carolina grant makers. And these are executive directors, finance directors, presidents and CEOs of community foundations all over the state. And it’s this universal vibe. How many times have heard someone say, “It’s for the community”? And it’s really imprinted on the DNA of this organization.
So when you say it’s a ‘thing’ that has a format, what do you mean?
CS: The most important way to distinguish it from other types of organizations is that it’s a public charity. It was very important to the founders to involve the entire community and that includes not only donors from every economic background — from folks with modest means to those who are more able to give — but it also includes the recipients. They wanted to include the entire community. Not one particular category. And the other hallmark of community foundations is they tend to concentrate on well-defined geographic areas. And for us that includes all of Dare County, Ocracoke Island and the Corolla beaches. Which I think most people would define that as the Outer Banks. But it is a recognizable style of philanthropic foundation that’s replicated throughout the country and probably the world. But there are special rules for community foundations that don’t exist for private foundations or other endowment funds.
MT: This 1982 annual report talks about the type of foundation and the entity structure.
And how do the funds work?
CS: If you look at any community foundation you’ll see that there are numerous ways that funding happens and that grants and scholarship or relief funds are invested in the community. But the two big ones for us are our internal grant program, where we use funding that comes from unrestricted gifts or filed of interest gifts — where donors say, “my field of interest is health and human services, you decide the best use of my earnings for this specific field of interest” — and that’s basically our internal grants funding program, where the staff and the board, through a grants committee, make the decisions on how to invest those dollars. And the other one that is equally powerful, and equally prevalent here, are Donor Advised Funds. And Donor Advised Funds are funds where the donor will let us know every year how they want those dollars to be invested. We could get a phone call and it says “send $5000 to this nonprofit” and we do. So it’s nice to have two big options. Two really strong options. One where donors get super involved, and one where the donors trust the staff to be on top of the unmet needs of our area.
And traditionally our donor funds are endowed so the principle doesn’t get touched, but you are able to reinvest in the community earnings every year, which is typically about 5%. But, the recent trends in the commercial, charitable industries has made every community foundation a lot more open to working with smaller donors that want to establish funds that re not endowed. It’s a great way for people to get to know us. So you can spend a non-endowed fun in real time. But the hallmark of what we do will still be endowed funds. And those are the ones that have the longer lifetime and a legacy.
So at least the interest goes out every year to somebody.
CS: Yes. And he headache of the tax forms and the disclosures and setting up bylaws — all the headaches of doing a public foundation — you have to have millions to make it worth your while. You’re better off working with an organization like ours, because we take care of all that for you. You establish the fund, you fund it, and then you call us when you want to get somebody money. And we take care of the rest.
So those are the Donor Advised Funds. What about the funds that you distribute?
CS: Our community enrichment grants. Every quarter we accept applications for grant funding from non-profits, and we have a committee that sits down and reviews all the applications. And they have a certain limit they can spend in that quarter. And they spend it all. I think the unspent dollars was seeming like 86 cents this year. So our DNA is not to sit on anything. We’re trying get the money out. My day to day, I have about 30 donors who have money they have to spend by the end of the year or it goes back into the principle. And I’m calling them to say, “Hey, you’ve got $7000 to spend on a worthy cause by Dec. 31…” and they can choose to reinvest it, but we don’t assume that’s what they want.
Can any non-profit make a request?
CS: Yes. And if you look at the applications , the overall theme that was established in 1982 and continues to this day is “unmet needs.” But when you look at the categories, just since I go there, we’ve helped fund a symphony to play the local schools, we’re going to be providing money to Dolphin research next year, we’ll be funding ICO for new computers next year. We’ll be funding Beach Food Pantry for a new freezer. Historic preservation. And we’re not the only donor by any means. But there all sorts of categories we can choose form. But the vast majority of funds we have available any given year is unrestricted. So by the end of the year we’ve spent it all.
But you have to have a non-profit to get the dough. But you don’t have to create a new fund to donate. You can donate to any of the existing funds you manage.
CS: Absolutely.
And then the disaster relief stuff, that’s usually unrestricted fun. And that’s where you have relationship to the ICO and other groups, where you give them the money, they get it into the right peoples’ hands.
CS: The grants go to non-profits, the dollars themselves in a lot of cases – and in every cases when it comes to disaster relief — do end up going to individuals. They go through nonprofits like the ICO and Cape Hatteras Methodist Men, who have case workers to determine the recipients. And there was a grant we gave to NC MedAssist for pharmaceuticals — but that money went to people, eventually. But we don’t fund individuals, we fund the nonprofits who serve the individuals.
How does the membership make a difference?
MT: The founders recognized two things. Right from 1982 the founders knew that bequests were going to be a great solution to getting funding. And to this day, bequests are a third of our assets. And of course part of that’s because they’ve appreciated so much over the years, and they came to us so long ago. And we’ve had several significant bequests over time that have appreciated because of great steward ship. But bequests are big part of it. But memberships, they saw as a way to spread the word and get the whole community involved. And the level was fifty bucks.
NS: And they did this whole campaign called ‘Let’s put something back.’ So they framed it as a way for the community to give back to itself.
Does it still function that way?
CS : It’s evolved some. We’re still a membership organization and we have meetings every year. But because we started getting into some of these other areas — like more disaster relief – and with the advent of being able to donate online and getting donations from all over the country, the idea of membership evolved. It’s still part of our bylaws and we do have a membership meeting every year. But now we consider all of our donors part of our membership family, it’s not as much of a calling card as it was in 1982.
So it’s not like you’re raising funds from dues.
CS: No. but if you decide to make a donation, we consider you a member. And we’ll invite you to our annual meeting and all the things our members get invited to, unless you ask us to stop.
So they were always about, “Let’s generate money, and when these issues pop up, we’ll do something about it. We won’t always be behind the Brew Station raising cash.” Moreover, it was like. “You trust us to watch the most pressing needs.”
NS: Yes, and part of that ideas was scholarships, as well.
Were they any specific projects they put out there?
CS: The first grant was to Hotline, and the second gift was a scholarship award.
NS: Inez Daniels Austin Scholarship Fund. Scholarships are still a huge part of what we do. In fact, sixty of our 200 funds are scholarship funds, which have awarded more than $2 million to local students over the years.
And some of those are repeat scholarships, correct?
NS: Yes, our largest renewable scholarship is $6000, committed for four years. And that one actually holds four students per year. So we have eight of these that are called enhanced scholarship that are $5000 or more that we give out every year to students.
And the way these funds works is people donate money, that remains untouched – and the interest is used to support causes or scholarships. And the size of the donation influences the amount of money that goes out, correct?
MT: Yes. And we have some great stories about appreciation. For example, a quarter of a million dollar fund started in 2005 by Diane Baum St. Clair. It’s given out over $300,000 in grants and it still has over $300,000 in the balance. And she’s one of the many colorful characters who’s made up this beach. And she loved it here, and she left something wonderful behind that’s doing great work.
What’s changed over the past 40 years?
CS: I think the main difference is the evolution of how many ways there are to give. Because the most traditional fund is an endowment fund, where the principle is established and every there is a spendable. And, over time, almost invariably, the growth of the principle in return on investment, exceeds the spendable. So, you’re spending a good amount of money every year, but the principle grows at the same time. That’s a hallmark of a lot of foundations, not just community foundations.
MT: But you have more to spend each year.
CS: But we do have some non-endowed funds. One of the most popular is a donor-advised fun, where you as a donor, will create a new fund and you decide where the money goes. There’s no grant application, no committee, you call and say “send this to them.” With some limitations.
NS: The board has to approve it, too.
CS: You can ‘t just say, “Give me the money back.” [ laughs] Then we have organizational funds, too. Like Hotline has one, Beach Food pantry, Dare Education Foundation. And those fund are established so every year a payable goes back to that organization for whatever expense they need it for.
MT: And many of those were established in Lorelei Costa’s tenure. And she did so much for the Community Foundation in her eight years.
NS: The eight years she was here, she doubled the size.
On the site, you see ties to a lot of local non-profits: Community Clinic of Dare, Dare County Arts Council, Dare County Boat Builders, Beach Food Pantry, Elizabethan Gardens, First Flight Foundation. How does that work? Is it a secondary fund-raising arm for them? And why not just donate to the causes directly?
CS: Fundraising for the funds works in a number of ways. We have people who fund it once as a family all at one time and that’s what is. We have organizations like the Arts Council that that try to grow it over time. We have scholarship funds where they have events every year to grow funds on an annual basis. There’s no set way to establish a fund, or generate the money that establishes a fund, and I don’t think there’s any set way to grow it. people use all sorts of ways to do it. Bequests is one.
MT: Part of what we do is talk to the organizations and share with them that bequests are a terrific way to grow their endowment, through gifts to their endowed fund. So, people, we can accept more complicated gifts, such as a gift from a will, or a gift of stock, or automobiles, or art collections, or property, than many non-profits are willing to deal with. We help them help their donors liquid assets and take in complicated gifts to help their bottom line. It also helps their donors understand that they’re in it for the long haul. We just heard a recent story from the Frisco Native American Museum. They have a jar in their entry way for their endowment and a guy was visiting and he saw the jar and said, “I want to make a gift to that endowment.”
So, it’s a way of showing a long-term commitment to a cause. You donate to the fund, that money’s going to do work in perpetuity, as opposed to a single item or short term need.
MT: And it says to that person, “this non-profit is serious, they’re in it for the long haul, their board is behind them, and they’ve done their homework.”
NS: And there’s the stewardship of the funds that goes a long with that. We have a finance person who really keeps track of that and makes sure the moneys are well-invested and so it’s part of that, it’s part of the work we do.
And you’re right. In my will, I might not think to leave property to support a cause. And now someone can do that. And a lot of this sounds like people making a lasting difference here. Are most of the donors people who lived here a long time?
CS: They have some sort of connection by and large.
MT: But more and more its’ people who move here and love it.
NS: Or people who don’t live here round, but have gotten so much from the Outer Banks and want to give back.
Are there any funds that are strictly preservational in approach. Because if you were to ask people what their biggest fear right now is, things changing. Like the Flat Top Foundation Preserves this headquarters. If there was fund that preserved old houses – or if there was affordable housing fund that bought and maintained houses to make sure dishwashers and prep cooks could live here — it might get some generous donations. Are there any?
CS: Not necessarily for housing. But we just a grant this past quarter ot room in the inn, specifically for transitional housing. But I think that’s a good segue for what the current leadership wants the next chapter to be. And that’s to get involved in some larger systemic issues that are impacting the outer banks right now at another one of these inflection points. I feel like there’s pre-COVID Outer Banks, and there’s post-COVID Outer Banks. And COVID, for large sections of the world, held folks back. But for the Outer Banks it was like this catalyst of new interest and new visitors and new residents and new revenue. And I think it’s probably going to be new problems right now. And there’s one donor who I spend a lot of time talking to, and her goal is try and establish some sort of fund like what you’re talking about.
And people say “They should make more affordable housing.” But who’s they? One thing I’ve learned going to a bunch of meetings, is there are things local government can and can’t do. And if I could, and I were in power, I would say go run and buy up as much empty property and cheap houses as you can right now, and sort it out later. But the government can’t just do that. But a foundation could.
CT: Well, the challenge for that particular issue is you could take every asset under our management and multiply it by 10 and you might make a dent but I think it may end up being something where we play a role, not necessarily [solve the problem]. But if all the forces of the county commissioners and municipalities, and all the civic groups like the chamber of commerce — who’ve been trying to address this for years — have led us to this point, our hope is we can be a positive participant in that conversations.
Yes. But if Oprah was reading this right now, and Oprah wanted to drop a billion dollars, Oprah could start a fund and start stockpiling property.
CS: Yeah. Absolutely.
And not that Oprah would do that, but maybe several small Oprahs. Or, more accurately, the same figures who say “We should do something” could get started on something like that. And it may not solve the whole problem, but it would be something – something could even grow.
MT: Well, you would have to start a non-profit, because we can only make grants to charities. But you could potentially do that. An organization could be created or established for housing.
Or, instead of hardship being a medical bill it could be mortgages.
MT: Yeah.
CS: Yeah, absolutely.
That’s interesting. Because it’s one of those issues that comes around constantly. And it really is hard for any municipality to solve. Even places with space can’t build their way out of a housing shortage. Go to any city with high-rises, real estate doesn’t follow laws of supply and demand. But a fund could act as a private subsidy – to a degree. So the other hairbrained scheme I pitched is was if someone bequeathed a house that would stay work force housing or long term housig, you couldn’t do that because you don’t manage the house.
NS: That’s Right.
But if someone wanted to start a nonprofit where they would manage donated house as a solution to workforce housing , you could help it receive more houses.
NS: Correct. And we could possibly pair them with an existing organization, like ICO.
So how has the purpose changed over the years. If the early days were sort of “we’re going to help fund local causes and give it some structure What’s different today?” Are y’all looking for problems that haven’t been addressed?
CS: It’s become more refined, but I don’t’ think it’s changed. If you look at David Stick’s opening statement, the first sentence says “community needs.” And I think the “why” of who we are hasn’t relay changed. But we’ve developed different capacities. Grant-making has always been there. The second award made was a scholarship. And stewardship of our donors philanthropic resources and intentions — that’s all been there from day one. Helping people who care, and connecting them with causes that matter to them. That’s been there from the beginning. But in the past several years, really — and Lorelei gets a lot of credit for this — we’ve been developing this sort of network of non-profit support. Seminars. Workshops. We ‘re dong a Duke non-profit training. So this is a growing history of another capability. And then Disaster relief. Dorian was a watershed moment for this organization. We learned we had a different kind of capacity than we thought we did– $1.5 million dollars went into the organization, and quickly went back out of the organization, to help people who needed it. It was all awarded in a matter of months. It took a while to close some loose ends, but it was fast.
MT: We had great leadership that reacted so quickly after Dorian struck and made those donations happen. They got on Facebook, got the phone…
So back up, then. What exactly happened. I know Dorian saw greater need because there was no FEMA declaration in NC, but that stuff happened a month later. What made this storm different? What was the chronology of events that sparked that response and how did it go from there?
CS: I wasn’t here at the time. But as an outsider, I think what happened is the board of directors got together immediately with an action plan…
NS: Even before the storm hit.
And how was that different than say, Mathew.
MT: Well, I think we knew the storm was going to hit. But we had pre-prepared for it. We’d been paying attention to all the media outlets. So we started fundraising ahead of time through Facebook. Lorelei and the board did a really great job of staying on top of that. and then as soon as it hit — as soon as it hit — they were on the phone, everyone together, formulating a plan, looking at who to talk to about big financial donations and where that money needed to go, and who was going to give out that money for us. And it just took off. It just took off.
CS: I know Bob Muller deserves a lot of credit. He came in and put in countless volunteer hours. And, in retrospect, Towne Bank deserves a lot of credit, too. They came in with a very large anchor gift. And when business in the community saw the magnitude of Towne Bank’s response it greased the skids for all different manner of business and individuals to support from around the country.
NS: And this is past experience for this organization, too. It wasn’t the first time that we’d given money out for disaster relief. So the ideas were in place.
MT: But $100,000 was the amount of money that we raised and distributed in Matthew. And in Dorian, the first Facebook fundraiser we did hit a $100,000 like hat.
So was it really a matter of more social media catching up, and more awareness?
NS: I think it was us being ready and putting it out there. Lorelei and [former board chair] Scott Brown created a new fund, because we knew it was really going to affect Ocracoke and we needed to be sure we could do something for Ocracoke. Because they are part of our service, but they’re not Dare County. So we needed a vehicle to do that. And then they had those conversations, established that fund right away, and then started doing fundraisers — specifically for Ocracoke, specifically for Dare, or for both. And over the weekend we raised half-a-million dollars — and that was just individuals. And then we got the big Towne Bank, donation, and then other businesses. But we had board members in here making phone calls, Bob was here with Lorelei, they were up until 3 in the morning staying on top of everything online. And at that time there were only 3 staff members.
And then, from there, it’s a matter of picking partners to distribute the funds.
NS: we had already identified the partners in Dare County, so the beaches were covered. So Ocracoke was the big issue for us. And Lorelei did an amazing job going to Ocracoke. We spent a couple of days there, meeting with people, creating this new non-profit. We took ICO down there to help make sure everything went in the right direction. And everyone came together and formulated a plan and a way to funnel the money.
MT: And Nandy’s bilingual, so she stayed down there to help with the Spanish-speaking needs. And now they have the Ocracoke Interfaith Relief and Recovery Team in place. And so they’ve got boots on the ground.
So if this happens again, there’s a vehicle and a system in place: money comes in here, and the action goes out there. And then in Dare County, we have the ICO and Hatteras Methodist men doing the same work, correct?
CS: Yes
And you and the ICO have been working in consort forever, right?
NS: Yes. Because they can do the people work. We’re just the money. [laughs] But they had a tried and true process, and they taught everybody, so everyone’s son the same page. And it has been a very wonderful coordinated effort.
So would you say that disaster relief is going to play more of a role moving forward?
CS: I don’t know about more of a role..
NS: I think it just defined roles.
CS: Right. And Bob helped us close that chapter with an exclamation point, by signing agreements with these three partners to create a brand new program. So it starts out as “all hands on deck” and turns into this really formal process. And we’re talking about doing a media trusted partner program now. so Dorothy Hester was president of the community foundation for a while and she was instrumental in getting out the word because the county directed donors to us as well. But we are the recommended non-profit recipient of donations for disaster relief in Dare County.
Which is why when folks call the county to donate for a disaster, they’ll say give it to you, because you’ll get it into the right hands for whatever is the most pressing need.
CS: Right. Think of it as a network. We’re a known within that disaster relief network and our role is to be the magnet for disaster relief funding. And there’s no reason why nobody could donate directly to ICO or those other groups. And they do, liberally. But we have a relationship with all these organizations and we’re part of that network.
But holidays are the time of year when you hear about non-profits that aren’t up to snuff. It sounds like, in this case, if you know you want to support a cause on the Outer Banks, there’s a way to do it and know the money’s going to the right spot, and will be used the right way, which is perfect for lazy people—which is 90% of the outer banks. Because if there’s a stereotype about Outer Bankers is we’re lazy. We want to help but you have to tell us how to do it. We won’t necessarily figure it out ourselves. So if you want to support a cause, here’s how: and you can be as specific or as loose as you want.
MT: Because we have all these funds.
NS: And we have all these causes.
Or you can make up one on your own.
MT: But the largest fund we have is the community fund. And that one supports all the grants we write, it supports everything we do. So the community fund is a great place for people to make a gift if they don’t want to decide on one non-profit or the other. Or if they just want to be sure that their gift is going to address the most urgent needs or most promising opportunities.
CS: That fund is the backbone of what we do.
People are lazy. People here are lazy but this is a mechanism to get things done.
CS: But people say “someone ought to do something about blank”. Most of how things actually get done, it’s like a black box. There’s no easy way for people to look into it and see their role, and to be able to work in an organization that’s kind of figured it out over 40 years, that has a recipe for addressing these problems, it’s easier than sitting through an hour-long meeting. And it’s probably more effective.
So give me examples. I know every quarter, there’s a grant application process. What are the causes you fund?
CS: Health and human services is a big one, arts and culture
SCOUT SCHILLINGS: Anything and everything.
NS: During COVID we supported not only health and human services, we supported education, school, childcare, diapers, Meals on Wheels. We learned so much from Dorian, it allowed us to do reactive quick grants. So we have an instrument now if somebody’s in dire need — and COVID, a lot of these small non-profits couldn’t support themselves, they could ask for assistance. So that started with Dorian with people getting buildings prepared after Dorian. We had a rapid-response. And if you submitted a two-page later– if you were a known entity, it was a one page letter. And we took care of it and put it out in two weeks.
So, COVID, there was so much going on. I remember the school bus lunches…
NS: a lot of it was childcare. Food for Thought. Internet access for students. YMCA camps. A lot of parents had to work, so YMCA created a great program so parents could put their kids there, and we offered financial aid. Mustang Outreach Program did something similar and we supported them. We supported Community Care Clinic with cleaning and supplies. Beach Food Pantry, Meals on Wheels. We ended up focusing on food, education and childcare.
SS: once that was handled, we pivoted. We gave a lot to Room at the Inn to make sure everyone had a place to stay that winter.
MT: And we had a board member who was a retired food exec, and he arranged for several trucks of food, because we wanted to get the food our food pantries said they needed. And he got al this stuff down on a semi, repackaged it, and got it out to all our pantries up and down the beach. And that was a rapid response grant.
That’s insane. So it’s whatever crisis is most urgent, you can pivot to handle, because you’re aware of what’s going on and who handles that issue.
NS: And there’s some coordination. Lorelei did a lot of it, MaryAnn did a lot of it, Chris will do the same thing, but it involves calling donors who have specific interests and lining them up with the needs. And that’s part of what we do, that’s part of our stewardship, is knowing that this donor really cares about animals. And if someone has a dire need, Chris or MaryAnn can call and say “Hey, someone here has this going on…” Same with our grants. Donors can help and pitch in, and we can say “We have this need in our community, and your fund can address it.” We orchestrate.
And at the same time there’s all these ongoing missions. What are some of the more niche fund s and needs?
CS: We have grants for equipment and hard goods, like there’s a grant for a stove. We bought a generator for a church in Avon for their food pantry. These are all grant applications.
NS: We moved a building for Chicamacomico Lifesaving Station – and purchased the lot to moved the building to.
SS: We have a fund that helps the maintain the Icarus monument at the Century of Flight memorial. And one for the band at the Manteo School.
MT: We have a lot of donor advised funds that have latitude to make grant recommendations for wherever they see a need, too.
One I read about was recent: a Hatteras couple started a food donation for one there. So that’s how those work: I want to help people in my neighborhood, I start my fund for this cause.
NS: The advice 5k that just happened feeds into our health and human services fund.
So, when you run the 5k, your entry fee feeds that fund.
SS: Which then feds into our grantmaking fund to support health and human services. , because it’s a field of interest.
NS: So that can help with COVID OR any of our health, substance abuse, mental health, hotline — all of that.
So is hotline the longest relationship you’ve had?
CS: It was the first grant, so that’s probably safe to say
It’s a shame there wasn’t a Festival of Trees this year. But I guess during COVID, a lot of groups couldn’t do their fundraising events, either. So I assume these funds are stabilizing effect.
SS: It’s financial sustainability.
CS: If you want to circle back to Hotline, we’ve been providing scholarships awards for non-profit professionals to take this Duke class. And we just gave Hotline the last two spots for Heather Chavez, the interim director and Bronwyn the new director. And this is for them to learn from the best. And it’s an intensive one-month non-profit management training, so they can right that ship. I feel like that that is a long-standing relationship that, even in tough times, there’s a way to give them a hand.
MT: I don’t think we’ve ever done non-profit training beyond one day. And this is an eight-day, comprehensive, certificate in non-profit management. You’re gonna know soup-to-nuts, ow to run an nonprofit.
It’s interesting to think that: 40 years ago, this group came along and says “we need a group to help these causes” Today, we have tons of groups, and OBCF says, “Let’s help these groups do better work.” It’s like an evolution.
MT: It’s a way to increase capacity.
NS: And there’s over 100 non-profits on the beach.
MT: And hopefully as we evolve, we can increase the capacity of local non-profits to serve.
I was looking at the list. You’ve got the Turkey Trot. Animal causes. Veterans. Lions Club Fishing Tournaments. You really can find a way to support your own cause – or start your own cause.
CS: Yup. And it runs full gamut the other way, too. We get large unrestricted gifts that come in with no strings attached.
And then you determine what the most pressing need is right now.
CS: My favorite, from a newcomer’s perspective are like Turkey Trot. Where someone has a general idea of how they want to help, but then they trust the community foundation and it’s leadership — which is primarily board members — to figure out that year, that moment, what the biggest needs are. We’re talking with a donor right now about establishing an education fund. And it would be a bequest, so this person won’t be around to dictate how funds are distributed, but he trusts that future boards — because I hope this person is with us for a long, long time — that future boards will have their finger on the pulse.
NS: And, Matt, staff don’t make grant decisions, it’s the board. And it’s a volunteer board.
How big is the board?
NS: 12 people.
So it’s not like 3 people.
NS: Our board works incredibly hard. We have an amazing group of individuals working very, very hard for this community.
MT: And it’s been happening for four decades now that these community leaders have been volunteering to serve in this capacity. They do their time, they make the decisions, and they’re directing the grants.
And the list of emeriti is pretty much a who’s who, too. Its’ the same folks you think of as trying to make a difference.
CS: One of the last things Edward Greene said to me before he passed was that what he liked most about the Community Foundation was that it always attracted the best of the best in our community to be its board members. It wasn’t lost on one of our founders that the folks on our board have a lot of accomplishments before they get there.
Is it hard to manage 200 funds?
ALL: [laughter]
Chris: Scholarship time and fund statement time are both “all hands no deck.” Every fund has an annual report, “Here’s how much money is in the fund, here’s what came in this year, here’s what you spent this year, how much assets grew, and here’s the bottom line heading into next year. And that happens every February for 200-plus funds, but way more recipients. Because some funds have more than one adviser. And that’s a ton of mail — and a ton of math. That’s all Jeff and Scout who do the calculations and it’s a full team effort to get that out.
MT: And throughout the year it’s a lot of donor stewardship, too. And helping people understand what they can do, what opportunities exist, how to structure a fund. So, we started a dozen new funds this year, and helping those donors through the process of establishing this forever legacy to the community. And sometimes, these are very sad stories, the funds are established out of hardship and loss. And you feel that with the donor and it ‘snot always easy. So there’s that part, too.
I don’t even know what my IRA’s doing at any given time. I can’t imagine I was for specific need.
SS: Memorization. It takes you a while, but it gets there — for at least the most commonly accessed funds.. Donors who have very specific wants from us in terms of being notified about every hit. And it’s a personal thing. So if it’s in memory of your husband, you want to thank every single individual that gives a gift. So if I have 10 different funds to keep track of in that way, I have to remember those donors. And I have to set aside that time to make sure they’re able to do that. Because that’s our service
MT: We need really good software. And Nandy, in the first quarter of the year, disappears.
NS: [laughs] we have 58 scholarship funds — 36 of those we manage in house. And we service Currituck High School, JP Knapp. We fielded 111 applications this year, and out of those, 56 awards were given, 24 of those were renewals. But we have a lot of need based and merit-based, which is great. Because we get to do both.
So what do you see moving forwards? More money? More problems? Both?
CS: We just did an two-day offsite meeting with our board of directors. And it’s an offsite meeting where you do team- building kind of stuff. And we put up these post-its. And one said, “more money, more problems.” But I think the past year was a pivot because of Lorelei’s departure. And it didn’t have to be a big pivot. But the folks who got together went out to stakeholder that included past board members, major donors, and asked:
“What should we do? We’re the precipice of 40 years, what’s the next chapter?” And I’ll give Clark Twiddy a lot of credit for this as board chair. Because he likes to think long term and he encourages others to think big. And coming out of that two day event, a couple of big pillars that were put down. The first and most important was “we can’t stop being excellent at what we do.” It came up over and over: “We’ve got scholarships, grant-making, non-profit support, disaster relief, and the stewardship of our donors’ most valuable resources.” That’s who we are, we cannot stop doing that…but we want to do more.
The metaphor that came up was , “We have a road we’re on, but we want to create an extra lane.” And one of the ways to do that is to really dig deep and find out more and more about the evolving community needs and what they might be in the future. And there’s a couple of important examples of that, and they weren’t necessarily what we decided to tackle, but if you were in that meeting, you wouldn’t have had any difficulty identifying the topics that came up — housing, addiction, mental health services, health and human services in general, aging – as things that ware always going to be problems, but as we go through this growth spurt on the Outer banks, they might become flash points. So, being more involved in some capacity, in big, endemic problems in our community. And I think hand in hand with that is the idea we need to reach out as many people who want to help as possible.
Outreach for us takes the form of fundraising. Because as Nandy put it, when we we’re going through disaster relief, we provided funding and then other non-profits connected those resources to the people who needed it most. So to me it felt like a tripod: maintain excellence in what our traditional services have been; establish a new capability, which we’ve already practiced – you’ve got Dorian, you’ve got COVID, there’s some new merging capability which wasn’t’ practiced in 2005. You’ve got this old lane, this new lane we want to be on, and in order to bring that all together we’ve got to give people more ways to give. We’ve got to find more people, we’ve got to tell our story and what we do, and we’ve got to give them every opportunity to help.
That was a long speech sorry.
Well, one issue you brought up that hit home was ‘aging.’ You already said you helped parents with childcare during COVID. But in-home care for aging parents is going to crush people down the road.
CS: I can’t find a provider for my mom right now.
And even if you can find a provider, what if you don’t have the means. What are you going to do?
CS: We’ll, we’ve got a lot of baby boomers, and we’re a retirement community. It’s like 1 +1 =1000.
Is there a fund specifically tied to that issue?
CS: There’s not, I don’t think….
NS: No, but it is part of health and human services.
CS: But it was brought up in the contest that we need to do some homework and meet with the organizations we’ve worked with over the years and meet with new people to find out where we have the most impact. Because where we have an impact will change. There could be a big problem where we bring our donors with us and it’s solved through financial resources — or it could be making coalitions. At this point we sort of know where the path is and we’re building a way to get here.
Is there a fund you wish you had. Is there a gap you see where you say “I wish we had a fund for that?”
CS: Well, I will throw out, it would be wonderful if we had a substantial fund that could help address elder care. And that’ stop of mind for me personally. I can give you a longer list…
Well, it seems to me if there’s two ways to help: support an existing fund, or start a new one. and if you wanted one to be started, what is it?
CS: Another one is mental health. What was it? four people died of overdoses a few weeks ago?
So is there not one fund that’s attached to addiction issues.
SS: Martin smith has a designated fun that goes to DARE Casa.
NS: buts’ not an overwhelming amount of money each year.
SS But if you have a downer advised fund, you can direct as much money as you can generate to whatever fund, which could be X amount to CASA, or to the ICO. And that’s at their discretion, so you can control how much comes in and how it goes out, and how much you want to be involved.
NS: The board still has to approve it, but yes.
CS: There’s a fund by Dorothy Luedemann that’s specifically for arts and culture and it’s a large fund. I wish there was one for mental health.
So, again, if Oprah’s reading this…
CS: I’d put mental health at the
MT: Health and Human services would address mental health and aging
CS: But w don’t have a Dorothy Luedemann fund for mental health issues. That would be wonderful to have, where every year it’s generating significant awards.
What if you have no money at all, but you still want to help?
NS: Every one of our nonprofits needs volunteers. Outer Banks Common Good posts every volunteer need on the Outer Banks.
But you all specifically don’t need volunteers?
NS: Our board members are all volunteers. But unless you want to shred paper for us or file paper for us, we’d direct you to one of those causes.. But one thing we like to challenge people with is, even if you don’t have money, there are ways to get your community excited about giving. We have a scholarship that was totally funded that way. Nancy Gray raised $25,000, like that, with a fish fry, $10 and $50 at a time. Her community showed up for her. So we tell people that too: you may think you don’t, but you have this power to get other people excited to give.
That’s amazing.
NS: She just started it. and it’s specifically for COA graduates which is awesome.
MT: It’s in honor of her husband who was a well-loved COA teacher and a high teacher, and they wrote all these books together.
CS: He owned Queen Anne’s revenge back it the day. I was the first bus boy. I’m a huge fan of his poetry.
Well, at a point you need staff. Because you can’t guarantee you’ll always have volunteers. But you mentioned volunteers in regards to the board. Can anyone ask to be on the board?
CS: There’s a nominating committee for board members. It’s made of the current board chair, one former board member, and one community board member. And a typical time on the board is about six years. It’s usually two consecutive 3 year turns. A couple have come back but they have to take a break. Dorothy Hester, Ray White, Casher Evans all served earlye in the history and came back and served again. But the nominating committee is independent from the board, which I thought was kind of cool. It’s a little bit of checks and balances.
But when it comes to volunteers, it’s not like Artrageous where you need 100 volunteers to make it happen. But having worked with volunteers so much over the past 10 years, I’d love to get more people involved. And I’d love for folks to educate us on community needs. that is a role people can play. Tell us what’s going on with spaying and neutering animals. Give us your experience and hopes for these organizations that we fund. Not so much a volunteer assistance as community input.
So yeah, you may not come in and shred files, but you can volunteer information.
CS: Way to tackle problems that the government can’t. The trip to Ocracoke for me was super cool, because I got to see our work in action. We had some meetings with non-profits and then we had an open house at the community center. And a lot of people expressed attitude for the work done. Lorelai, through force of will, just made these things happen. And there was a woman who came in and said “thank you so much.” A part of the dock at Ocracoke had blown up and knocked down a full wall of her business. And she said “You guys provided the funding to rebuild our business.” And I didn’t have anything to do with that, but it was cool for me to hear “This made a big difference.” So that’s the great part of my job right now is I’m learning 40 years of people who were helped and problems solved – or at least moved the needle
You mentioned Lorelei Costa, Bob Muller. Who are some of the other key figures from the past 40 years?
CS: That’s’ tough. But there’s a couple who’ve back for the second time on the board, and one was Casher Evans. Another is Dorothy Hester. She was on as a young woman just getting started in her career, and after she became the public information officer for the county, in around 2012, she came back on. And she was on for the better part of a decade.
NS: Ray White came back, and was a huge influence I would say.
CS: Diane Baum St. Clare, for sure. And the Doren family. They gave massive gifts.
MS: The Doren endowment was a watershed moment.
CS: That was the start of our main grant-making fund. It was like a $1.6 million gift.
MT: And those donors who made those million dollar gifts back int eh day, really created our foundation.
You said the amount of money you’ve given out to date was $12 million, right?
CS: $12 million. And the size of the organization is roughly $25 million altogether.
And I’d assume the bulk was the past 20 years.
CS: Yeah. I think if you look at just the community enrichment grant from last year was probably a quarter million , and the Donor Advised Funds were at least that.
So what’s y’all’s cut? How do you support staff?
Well, it’s not from disaster relief. But every community foundation has a management fee that goes along with the funds. It’s not conceptually different than your brokerage statement if you invest. Ours are in line with industry standards and published on our websites and for the most cases it’s one-percent per year. But we get annual, unrestricted donations to help cover costs. But when we do disaster relief appeals, we do not take any cut off of that. We’re a conduit for those dollars. We get them out the door as soon as we can get them into a relief effort. But we don’t’ charge any admin fee on disaster relief funds.
I thought it was neat the Flat Top Foundation fun helps keep y’all’s headquarters in shape. It makes sense, right: you know that donation is doing that.
CS: well, it wasn’t us. It was donors. A donor gave us the building and a donor established the Flat Top Fund . So it was people who were concerned. And it just kind of happened. And I think it was back when they were first debating whether we need staff. Because for years sit was just volunteers.
And you said $1.5 million for Dorian alone.
CS: That’s right. And $350,000 for COVID.
MT: Well, the $300,000 in rapid response last year, plus community enrichment. But that’s part of what we want to do is create a timeline that charts the grants we’ve paid out.
Anything planed for the 40th?
MT: A lot of that I still TBD. But we’re a small staff. I don’t foresee a big gala or event, but I foresee a lot of listening. I think we’re going to be engaged in a lot of initiatives to start the next 40 years.
So how much does it take to start a fund?
MT: Yu can start a fund here for as little as $5000. And the initial investment could be $1000, and you get three years to come up to the $5000 amount. And it’s our way of helping people of modest means create an endowment. But that’s less than many larger community foundations. And people from all over can crate a fund here and have it serve anywhere in the us.
So Nancy gray raised $25,000. But you could rase $5000 and do the same thing. And that money will grow to.
MT: Well, scholarship p funds are a little more expensive. And it’s because of the committees and all the time it takes to go through applications and deal with the awards ceremonies.
NS: But you can start scholarship fund with as little as $5000, if you do it as a partner scholarhip with on one of our team partners — like Mount Olivet or Manteo Rotary. Or you can pay to be a contributor to our OBX Scholarship Fund. And if it’s a new group we haven’t dealt with, $10,000 to start. And in order to participate in the stuff we take care of: we do the application, the selection, etc. – the minimum for that is $20,000. And it has to have a minimum of a $1000 award, and they’re all renewable. And that was to make it more impactful for the student. A thousand bucks every year can really help a kid.
MT: And Lorelei really encouraged that.
It really is the difference between “Here’s $100 to spend now” and “here’s money that il go on and good for a while.”
NS: And when you talk about trust, it’s not just trust between us and the organizations that help people, it’s the trust we build with our donors. If a donor says ‘I’m giving you $100, that I want to go to a kid from Dare County’s college tuition, that’s where that money’s going. And that’s 100% trust they put on us to do the right thing. And that’s what we do. We abide by that. And MaryAnn really stewards those relationships to make sur we’re staying on track. And we keep that in mind every day. If I don’t give out hat $1000 to that kid, that’s something I’ve done wrong for that donor. So trust is a huge part of what we do.
____________________________________________________________
You can buy a waterpipe — just don’t get high with it. Sell CBD at a corner store — but can’t grow hemp on an unlicensed farm. Get caught smoking a joint without going to jail — but you’ll still have to cough up a hefty fine.
No wonder people are confused about the state of cannabis laws in NC. One place that’s not confused anymore? Virginia. As of July 1, anyone 21 and over can possess less than an ounce, and every household can raise up to four plants. Meanwhile, in March, even more notoriously conservative South Carolina came close to approving medical cannabis for serious illnesses, such as cancer, epilepsy and PTSD.
“The Compassionate Care Act passed the house,” says Carly Wolf, State Policies Manager for The National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), the legalization movement’s leading voice for the past 50 years. “The Senate never got to it before the end of the session, but it’s my understanding they’ll be taking it up again in early 2022. So hopefully there’s more support to get it over the finish line.”
With our two closest neighbors blazing ahead of us on the cannabis issue, many Outer Bankers are wondering: Is NC next? The answer: Don’t start sparking it up just yet.
“North Carolina has a lot of potential,” says Wolf. “Bills get introduced every year — which is super important. But they still aren’t moving forward much. So, I think your state has a little while to go.”
We asked Ms. Wolf exactly where we stand compared to the rest of the country. And how we can avoid ending up as what she calls “an island of prohibition.” — Matt Walker
The following interview was conducted over two phone calls in July 2021. An edited version appears in issue 10.3 of Outer Banks Milepost.
It feels like we’re in the back of the line when it comes to legalization of marijuana. But a lot of people felt that way about Virginia. So we wanted to get your thoughts on what it will take for NC to follow suit. But first…. is it safe to say NORML is the tip of the spear when it comes to the past several decades of legalization efforts?
CARLY WOLF: NORML is one of the longest-standing legalization organizations in the world, I believe. We’ve been around since 1970 – literally for decades. And one thing that’s unique about NORML is we’re solely representative of the responsible cannabis consumer, rather than the industry. So the main things we fight for are removing criminal penalties, expunging past records – things that consumers face in their everyday lives.
So, I’m 50. I’ve been paying attention for 35 years or more. If you told me when I was 20 that we’d have legalization in any state, it would be hard for me to imagine. How many have legal weed right now?
Seventeen or 18. Eighteen is kind of in flux with South Dakota being legally challenged.
And that’s fully legal – or does that include medicinal?
That’s fully legal, adult use, regulated access.
What would you say is the tipping point?
Good question. I would probably say the 2020 election. I know that sounds recent, but in the past year we’ve almost doubled the amount of states that have been legalized. So in 2020, out of the ballot initiatives that appeared in front of voters regarding marijuana reform, every single one of them passed. Not only did they pass, they passed overwhelmingly. So that was really cool to see, and a huge tipping point. And now, at this point in 2021, there’s already been four states to legalize it through their legislature — so i think that was definitely a tipping point and we’ll continue to see that trend in the years following, too.
What were the other states besides Virginia?
I count New Jersey, because even though the legalized via ballot measure in November 2020 it wasn’t really official until law makers passed legislation to legalize it. I believe that happened I late January. So, New Jersey, Virginia, New Mexico and New York.
It’s kind of a diverse group, too, right? I don’t think anyone was surprised to see California or Colorado legalize – or Oregon and Washington for that matter. What’s changed htat’s allowed some of these less left-leaning states to come around.
I think public support has definitely increased rapidly in the past few years. With all these ballot measures we see pop up and pass overwhelmingly, that just goes to show, that especially in the ‘redder’ states, when lawmakers don’t take up the issue, when lawmakers fail to act, the citizens of that state will take it into their own hands with ballot measures. And I think that’s the way we progress the most at the state level. I guess until Illinois, 2020, it was the first state to do it legislatively. But the rapidly increasing public support, I think that in turn puts more pressure on lawmakers. And I think that’s a big reason for this turning point.
Do we have ballot measures in NC?
I don’t’ believe NC has a citizen initiated process, though I’m not sure. I think its more like New Jersey where the legislature referred it to the ballot. But I’m not sure that NC lawmakers have that ability either.
So, it stands to reason, if you are in a situation where there’s a legislature that’s not interested in taking up bills, if you can get it on the ballot, and you can force their hand, that’s the next step.
That’s the way, to date, that most states have done it. We’re seeing more states do it through their legislatures, but that tends to be more Democrat-controlled states that do it through their legislature.
So you can tell me more about what the state of cannabis legality is in North Carolina?
Sure. So right now, North Carolina ha a very limited low-THC medical program. Right now if a person a has intractable epilepsy [Ed. Note: intractable epilepsy is a condition when persons cannot control their seizures by medicine] that’s the only condition that’s allowed to possess low-THC medial cannabis oil products. So any product that has less then 9/10ths of 1% of THC and at least 5% CBD. And for folks who might not be familiar with CBD, that’s the non-psychoactive component of the marijuana plant. So you won’t get high from it.
That was the Charlotte’s Web law that McCrory approved, correct?
Yes. And it’s just for that one condition. And there’s not even any in-state production. So folks with intractable epilepsy would have to obtain it elsewhere.
But hemp and CBD are legal , correct? Or is that a grey area?
Hemp is legal federally. But in order to produce it you have to be licensed by the state.
Well there’s CBD all over the place now. So is it safe to assume it’s legal in NC, too? Or is that gray area, to?
CBD is a little bit more of a gray area than straight- up hemp. Because CBD is not specifically regulated. It wasn’t specifically included in the 2018 farm bill that legalized hemp, so a lot of those CBD brands are not subject to state or federal regulations. So, for that reason, there could be products with questionable safety. We’ve seen a bunch of reports over the past several years, including in the past year, that some of these CBD products that are available in gas stations or grocery stores are not always accurately labeled. So for that reason, people should definitely be careful. And I would personally recommend people purchase CBD products from licensed dispensaries for that reason.
It’s interesting. I think one of the overall arguments for legalizing is you know what you’re getting, whatever that might be. You look at what fentanyl is doing in the opioid world and you see how legalizing can be a safer route.
Yeah. And I think generally, I guess when marijuana’s first legalized, when the market is newly emerging, I think it’s important to keep it competitive with the illicit market so it incentivizes people to patronize the legal market. But I think generally consumers would prefer to have a product they know has been tested and that they know doesn’t contain harmful pesticides or contaminants. I think consumers would prefer that regardless.
So when you’re trying to convince people this is not a bad idea, what are the arguments you use? Is it mostly economic: this is a new industry? Because it seems like NC, as a tobacco state, this would be slam dunk. Or is more than that?
That’s definitely part of it. Especially in more conservative states, I think Republicans could be more receptive to those economic arguments, especially as we’re coming out of the COVID pandemic and a lot of states are suffering with revenue and budget shortfalls. That’s definitely a compelling argument. Another concern that’s brought up by the opposition is kids — they don’t want it to get into the hands of kids. But that’s actually a great argument for regulating, because with thriving black markets, it’s never been easier for kids to get their hands on marijuana. But regulation, obviously — bringing it behind counters, checking IDs — is a logical policy change for that reason, too.
Speaking from personal experience, it was always harder to get beer as a kid than it was to get weed.
There’s been tons of studies and research that shows, and teens are self reporting that, it’s harder it get once it becomes legal. So the ‘kids argument by the opposition seems somewhat logically flawed.
How has the opioid epidemic swayed this? Are people realizing that there are better ways to deal with pain management? And better understanding of how people use recreational drugs?
Sure. I’ll first say that marijuana is objectively safer than many of the prescription medications, including opioids, that are out there and being regally prescribed and used by people. And there’s been a ton of data that shows that states that have legal access to marijuana, we’ve seen declines in opioid prescriptions, overdose deaths, hospitalizations – just a general decline in opioid usage. So I’d say that’s definitely a compelling argument for legal marijuana.
And another thing, and this ties back to the kids argument, you’re not going to go to dispensary and have the guy behind the counter try to sell you something harder.
Exactly.
How have the states with long-standing recreational programs, how have they fared. I mean you hear the whole ‘gateway drug’ argument. What have we seen?
In the legal states right now, I think those laws have largely been working as voters intended and as lawmakers intended. We haven’t seen a significant increase in youth use. We haven’t seen any increased work place issues. We haven’ seen any increased traffic fatalities, or any compromises in public safety. So essentially, these laws are working as they were intended to. And they’re bringing in millions of dollars in revenue.
Do some states tie the revenue to special uses? Like: this is for education, this is for drug awareness?
Absolutely. In Colorado, localities use the marijuana revenues to repave roads and improve infrastructure. Some use it for education and to fund public schools. To address substance abuse and prevention campaigns. Each state uses it differently , but we’ve seen the revenue get funneled back into great things for our communities.
Well, California got the medicinal rules roughly 20 years ago. So it stands to reason that if these places were having significant issues other states would’ve recognized dhat. If it was going poorly there would be less momentum.
Of course. If these laws weren’t having success , surely we’d be seeing efforts to repeal these laws, which hasn’t happened to my knowledge. But I agree, the momentum would not be as strong as it is today if these laws were not working as they are now.
And yet, simultaneously, we’re in this weird space. We’re occupying two worlds. You go online, in DC, they a offer “joints for jabs” —but it’s federally illegal. But didn’t’ the house pass a bill that allowed for regulated marijuana – and it failed in the senate?
Yup. That’s correct. Last Congress, the MORE Act, which would de-schedule marijuana from the controlled substances act federally, it passed the house of representatives. It was literally in the last month of Congress. Once it arrived in the Senate it did not receive nay more consideration. And I don’t expect it to unless the democratic control gets wider.
It’s? Will it have to be legalized in every state before the fed finally relents? Which do you think will come first?
Really good question. I think the momentum at the state level, which is where all our real progress is happening, I hope that will continue to put pressure on the federal government. As more states legalize, that should create some additional allies in congress from newly legal states. It’s my hope that we achieve federal legalization, even if it’s just to relieve that state/federal tension. I think its important. And I think it’s possible for federal legalization to come sooner rather than later, but it’s hard to say which will come first.
It just feels like we’re in this fantasy limbo. Everyone knows someone who burns. Nobody wants them to get in trouble. And yet…
You have prominent politicians coming out and saying that they tried it. Then you have people in other states, primarily in southern states, sitting in jail for smoking a joint. That dichotomy is so crazy.
It’s like we’ve ‘just said no’ for so long, we can’t ‘just say yes.’ So what are the incarceration levels right now. How many of these drug offenses are just small weed offenses.
I don’t know state by state by state, but nationally there are more than 600,000 marijuana arrets a year. And obviously there are huge racial disparities. I believe the [statistics show that] Black people are almost 4 times as likely to be arrested than white people.
I’m sure there are financial imbalances, too. If you’ve got the resources to hire a lawyer, you’ll do better.
It’s true.
So at one point, the adversarial forces were the prison system makes money , the legal system makes money, law enforcement seizes property. Are those still the primary foes? Or is that starting to change?
I think they’re definitely still in place. I know in NC that jail time is removed from low-level possession, but it is still a $200 fine. So the disproportionately poorer people being arrested, chances are, they can’t afford that fine. So what happens next? They’re arrested for not paying the fine, and that could escalate significantly. Which is why we always advocate for nominal to low fines for decriminalization polices. So that’s surely an issue and it continues to be to this day.
Were you surprised that Virginia changed its tune? I feel like they were on the harsher end of the spectrum for many years. But then, I also know here it seems to be less of a focus. So, even in places that aren’t legalizing are you seeing a softening in terms of how much they’re going after it?
Yeah. I think it definitely happens in baby steps. I wasn’t surprised it happened in Virginia; I was a little surprised it happened that quickly. But Virginia is an interesting state because it’s now a lot more “blue” than it was six or seven years ago. We also have an incredible NORML chapter in Virginia, which I think has a little something to do with it. But hopefully Virginia will be a tipping point for more southern states. But even in states that aren’t going for full legalization I think smaller reforms are very possible.
How much does proximity make a difference? We’re literally 45 minutes away from Virginia. I can picture a world where you got to the Border Station, and you’re buying weed on one side of the store, and the other side you’re getting a fine. Is that the hammer and the anvil we’re dealing with? When too many states legalize it, you can’t discern?
That’s a good point. When one state is an island of prohibition, people realize that it’s not that nobody’s using marijuana in that state, they’re just going elsewhere to obtain it. And I think that’s why there’s been so much momentum in the northeast — states like New Jersey, Connecticut, Delaware, they somewhat border each other. And it’s inevitable that people are gonna use marijuana whether it’s legal or not. They’ll just obtain it in another sate – or illegally. So that’ another argument for regulation.
And then what just happen din South Carolina?
They were really close to enacting medical marijuana. I believe it was on the senate floor and it came down to the end of the session, they were scheduled to debate it, and then the never got to it before the end of the session. Which is unfortunate. Bu it’s my understanding they’ll be taking it up again in early 2022. So hopefully there’s more support to get it over the finish line. I’m hopeful.
So to me, it sounds like we have these situations where the people want it, but the politicians keep chickening out. Even Biden’s said he doesn’t want to legalize though his party does. What’s the deal? What’s the reason? Is it personal opinion?
Its’ weird to see such a huge gap between the constituents and their lawmakers. An honestly, lots of times old white men are the problem. And these state legislators, when I listen to hearings and floor debates, I hear them spreading all this reefer madness – marijuana is a gateway drug, it’s gonna hurt our children, all these people will drive high and cause traffic accidents… which is just not true. And the perpetuation of that ‘reefer madness’ mentality that was tarted decades ago is still prominent today. And it’s due to al ack of education. That’s the overarching issue.
So how do people educate. I guess that’s what we’re doing here. But what else?
Its super important for people to contact their lawmakers and let them know this is an issue that’s important to them. Keep up that pressure on their lawmakers. It’s important to support advocacy organizations doing that outreach to educate folks and the general public. The constituent-to-lawmaker lobbying is very effective. When people share their personal stories that’s a very effective way for lawmakers to put an issue to a face and see how it really affects people in their daily lives. That’s a really effective way to communicate with lawmakers on this issue.
How important is it for the average citizen to just be honest about their use and experiences? Does it help to be “out” about your cannabis use?
I think any awareness is helpful. Meaningful conversations, whether it’s between two family members at a dinner table or a constituent and a lawmaker, it helps. The stereotypes about stoners are still in people’s minds. It’s important to show that ‘stoners’ aren’t just lazy people who get nothing done. People who consume marijuana can be good parents, run successful businesses people – -it can literally be anybody. Those stereotypes are not an accurate depiction of the responsible cannabis consumer.
You lauded Virginia’s activist base. How does North Carolina compare?
We do have a pretty active NORML chapter in North Carolina. But it’s mostly just volunteers who are passionate about this issue. Which I give them so much credit for. Because obviously it’s not an easy issue to advocate for. But it’s those volunteers in their communities that are at the state capital and local city councils that are making a difference.
Is it a catch 22? If people aren’t getting popped left and right, they don’t feel threatened enough to do something?
Somewhat. But I think even after legalization there are still a ton of issues that come up. So it’s not like the work stops from there. So I think that through each point, whether a state’s legalized or not, there are compelling issues and different things that effect people at those different stages hat are really important.
If nothing else, there’s the economic argument: why let Virginia get all the money? So are there any active bills in North Carolina?
Yes. In North Carolina this year there are definitely legalization bills pending. None of them have moved forward yet, but they’re there. There’s also medical marijuana and decriminalization bills pending. The most notable thing I’ll mention is the medical marijuana bill is bipartisan – which I think is super important, because in a Republican controlled legislature it’s very difficult to get a bill through that doesn’t’ have at least some Republican support. So this year the chances are better than ever for medical marijuana, or maybe decriminalization, but I think legalization is probably a few years off.
When you say bipartisan, is it basically one R?
Yeah [laughs] but that makes it bipartisan.
Where is he or she from?
It’s senate bill 711. And one other thing I’ll mention, but last year the governor convened a racial equity task force and they actually recommend that the state decriminalize marijuana, which is notable as swell.
Duh. That’s a good question: where is Gov. cooper on this? I mean , I feel like these guys don’t put their neck out until they have to, but…
Yeah, Cooper is definitely one of the more conservative Democrats on the issue. I don’t think he’s come out in support of legalization. He’s not very outspoken generally on the issue. I’m not sure if he’d support a medical marijuana bill. I feel like the arguments against medical marijuana are kind of low these days. But I don’t know how Governor Cooper would feel about a legalizing bill should it get to his desk. Hopefully we’ll learn more in the next coupe years as these bills start to move. But you’re right: they don’t typically speak out on these issues before they have to.
Well, North Carolina was the last state to ratify the 21st amendment. We still have blue laws. You can’t buy liquor on Sunday. Do you think it’s inevitable that every state has to ratify at some point? And will NC be last again?
I hope that every state would move forward, especially if the federal government ends prohibition. But it’s hard to say. North Carolina has a lot of potential. There’s bills introduced every year. That’s something. Even if they aren’t moving forward, they’re starting conversations, which is super important, too. But I think NC has a little while to go. Because these bills have not moved forward at all. I’d say we have a little while to go before legalization in North Carolina.
What about municipalities. I assume they can’t legalize weed, but is there room for them to pass resolutions saying “We’re pro-legalization?”
Yes, actually. We’ve seen a lot of reform happen on the local city or county level within larger prohibition states. We have a report on our website on cities in different states that have decriminalized marijuana, while statewide it’s still illegal. So, there’s definitely progress at the local level. I think that in individual cities, city councils could be more receptive to those types of reforms, particularly n larger cities that lean more left. But several states where marijuana is illegal have municipalities that have decriminalized or passed resolutions urging the state to enact reform. So there’s a pathway from the local level up.
Like I said: you can buy a bong, CBD weed – are we just kidding ourselves here? It seem like a death of 1000 tokes kind of approach.
I’d like to say that legalization is inevitable, but it’s up to the activities to keep up the pressure and not let lawmakers just not act on these issues. It’s important to hold them accountable.
So, what happens if someone has a medical prescription in Virginia and comes down with weed? Does that work here?
I don’t think North Carolina would honor out of state medical cards. So that person would still be subject to arrest. I guess it depends on the law enforcement that they come in contact with and if they want to use their discretion or not. But I don’t think out-of-stater are protected under North Carolina’s medical law.
In a lot of places, even before they legalized, law enforcement didn’t pursue it — like California — because they have so much more to deal with.
Well, that’s a big argument I use: Why are you going after low level possession offenders when you have murders to solve?
You expressed earlier that a lot of states end up passing legalization measures by ballot measure. So what exactly does that entail?
The ballot measure process is largely facilitated by the residents of any given state. Not all residents allow that process; basically half of them do. But essentially the residents of a state takes it upon themselves to draft an initiative — similar to how resolution is drafted — and it would be either accepted or rejected by, typically, the secretary of state. Once [it’s accepted] they’re allowed to collect signatures. There’s usually certain criteria based on the population of that state, regarding the number of signatures they need to collect. And then once the turn in the signatures, that’s the time for the secretary of state to review and validate them. And assuming they meet all the requirements, then it would qualify for the ballot.
Was that how it happened in New Jersey?
So, New Jersey was actually unique because they don’t have a citizen-initiated ballot process, but they are able to legislatively refer ballot measures. So the lawmakers passed a piece of legislation that directed the marijuana question to appear on the ballot. And then once that was approved by voters in November, it was up to the lawmakers to outline all the rules and regulations; so they again had to pass legislation to actually implement and legalize marijuana officially. I don’t know how many other states do it the way New Jersey does, but there are a couple more. But it’s another way to get it on the ballot.
North Carolina’s in the same situation. We have ballot measures, but the legislature puts them on the ballot instead of the citizens. So I guess we’re out of luck in terms of gathering signatures. Because in our state, even though polling shows public support, the legislature’s still opposed. But I guess you may have a politician who doesn’t want to vote yes or no themselves, but will be more willing to vote for putting a measure on the ballot and put it in the hands of the people? Because they can still say “I didn’t vote for legalization.”
Yes. At least it’s my hope that lawmakers have the desire to represent the will of their own constituents. And there’s no better way to do that than putting it to a vote by the people.
And that’s where galvanizing voters to contact their legislators comes into play, because it might force them to take that small step forward.
Exactly.
Can you describe the political pressures opposing legalization? I know that Raleigh is a big pharmaceutical epicenter. And Big Pharma’s been called out for lobbying against legalization — particularly opioid makers. Could that be one of our road blocks here?
I haven’t seen specific instances of Big Pharma pushing back in North Carolina, so I can’t speak to that.
Then who are the groups that typically oppose?
It’s usually law enforcement. Triple A is another group we see opposing with regard to the impaired driving concerns. And a lot of faith-based groups, too, oppose legalization efforts. Those are the big ones.
Back in the day, alcohol was a big foe because they didn’t want competition. Is that antiquated as well?
Yeah. I think now the big alcohol companies are getting into the debate in favor of legalization. In a lot of states, we see the large corporations dominating the industry, and I think the big alcohol companies want to get in on that. So, at least on the federal level, we’re seeing interest form big alcohol and tobacco companies for sure.
Tobacco seems like they’d want a new market right away.
And now, I’m not sure how many states regulate cannabis infused alcoholic beverages, but that could be a pathway for alcohol companies, too.
What about the pitfalls that come after legalization. I know in Florida, just applying to a license to grow medicinal is like $60,000. People see it as a way for big money to price out eh little guy. Are there ways states can learn from that before they legalize make it more egalitarian.
Yeah. And one thing that we at NORML fight for is equity in the industry. And I know that’s definitely becoming a bigger part of the legalization conversation now, than when it was , say, back in 2014 when Colorado and Oregon were the first to do it. But I think that the licensing fees are a huge barrier for smaller businesses. Because in some states it’s tens and even hundreds of thousands of dollars for license. And that will no doubt shut out the smaller businesses.
Can you give me an example?
I want to say Illinois had some of the steepest fees. I’m not sure of the exact number, but I belie it was $100,000 to apply for license.
So even after legalization the fights aren’t over. There are other issue you have to deal with to make sure the industry operates fairly.
Absolutely. Now we’re seeing in states, at least the states that were considering legalizing this year, a lot of them include specific social equity programs. So they’ll set aside a certain number of licenses for what they call “equity applicants.’ So that could be anyone who lives in a community that’s seen the most harm from prohibition – whether that’s high arrest rates or high racial disparities, or what have you. So that’s a good thing for sure.
Well, clearly the movers and shakers are lining to be poised to strike whenever it happens. I know here, the people doing CBD are hoping it will put them in a position to act on medicinal or adult use.
Yes. That was a actually a big issue in Delaware as they were considering legalization this year. The existing medical cannabis operators were actually lobbying against the legalization bill because they weren’t given first use priority for adult-use licenses.
So much for the whole, mellow, feel good vibes. I guess a lot of it just comes down to money. There’s big dollars at stake, on both sides, and it’s going to draw that type of competing.
Yeah. It’s going to be difficult to thwart that in any industry. It’s about making profit, right?
Is a lot of this just old-school puritanism? I mean you can vape tobacco, which is horrible fo you. Bu anything that gets you high has an uphill battle?
I think so. And with the faith groups, I think it’s just the ‘reefer madness’ ideology is still so problematic. And it comes down to lack of education.
So here, the big money comes from tourism. And on the Outer Bank —or at least Dare County – 80% of our ‘feeder markets’ – all those states have some sort of legalization. If you’re getting fed that population, in our case, overwhelmed by thousands, it stands to reason that has to influence some decision-making, at least on a local level.
You would think so. If North Carolina is literally an island of prohibition, the states and localities will lose out on that revenue.
In the old days, everyone went to Amsterdam to smoke. How big is weed tourism. Do you have any of those numbers?
I don’t have specific statistics, but I will say Nevada just passed legislation to regulate “cannabis consumption lounges.” So in a city like Las Vegas, which is a huge casino and nightlife destination, I think cannabis tourism will begin to boom. And there are definitely other states that regulate those social use venues. So once those become more normalized, I think that will contribute to a huge boom in cannabis tourism.
Of course, where we live, we’re half partiers and half super conservative. It will be interesting to see who wins that battle.
Yes, it will.
_________________________________________________________
“Why the f&* is this light still red?!” You’re not the first to ask that question. Especially in summertime. Pick the right — or rather, the wrong — time to drive, you might catch every single one of these crimson eyesores. But there’s not some master plan keeping you from getting where you need to be. In fact, the master plan is designed to keep you moving.
“Our Raleigh unit creates the master plan,” says Jason Davidson, Division Traffic Engineer for NC DOT Division One. “And it uses certain vehicle count thresholds, where it will switch from one master plan to the next to move traffic most efficiently. Then I have a team of guys at the beach, whose daily job is to keep it running.”
They’re the ones climbing poles and changing bulbs. Fixing crosswalk buttons and tweaking timers. Twice a year they pore over everything, street triggers to circuits, just to keep cars moving. As we head into the high season, we asked Davidson to explain how the whole system works — and what folks can do to cruise more and curse less. — Matt Walker
This interview was conducted in April 2021. An edited version appears in Milepost Issue 10.2
MILEPOST: What’s your exact title, Jason?
JASON DAVIDSON: I’m the Division Traffic Engineer for NC DOT Division One.
What’s that mean?
Basically, I oversee the unit that handles all the roadway striping, roadway signing and traffic signals.
So you’re the guy people want to yell at?
I’m probably the most abused person with DOT. [laughs]
We’re obviously kidding, but lord knows, down here traffic is the number one complaint. And that made us want to ask: “How do they make the traffic signals work.” So can you tell us what your job entails? Particularly with the way the signals work?
My group here, locally, is in charge of the installation and maintenance of traffic signals. We deal with the minor timing adjustments that are conducted in the field. So, going back a little bit, with traffic signals and everything, what we use on the outer banks is called a “Loop Detection System.” So, basically there’s a wire buried in the asphalt that picks up the magnetic resistance from a vehicle. It works similar to an electric dog fence. So it picks up the presence of a vehicle, which places a call on the traffic signal, and it knows there’s a vehicle sitting there. And that goes into its timing plan, which disperses traffic and allows it to go at specific times.
So, aha, so now I can settle an argument with my son. Does that mean I’m helping or hurting when I try to creep forward or backward to trigger alight?
It really doesn’t make any difference, because the loop is about 40 feet long. So anywhere in that zone, just a couple feet ahead of the stop bar back 40 feet, there’s a detection loop. And that’s for your turn lanes, your side streets. For the main part of 158, we don’t have a loop at the stop bar because the traffic demand is high enough that [the pattern] knows it needs to go back and serve that phase. So there’s loops placed further back that are picking up the queuing traffic, and not necessarily at the stop bar. So if you’re on 158 heading north, and you’re sitting at the stop bar, it doesn’t make any sense to creep forward or roll back. A lot of folks say, “It felt like I moved forward and then the light tripped.” Well, what it was, was the signal was already activated, and your patience gave out just about the time the time ran out at the signal and it was going to let you go anyway.
Correlation is not causation. So, it sounds like your goal is to keep 158 traffic moving no matter what. So they’ll stay green as long as nothing changes. And then when you come to the side streets, say, Helga, now you have to think about stopping. And that’s what’s gonna trigger the stop more than what’s happening on 158. Because they’re designed to default to green as much as possible. Is that right?
Absolutely. Unless there’s a vehicle on 158 in the turn lane. The turn lane will work the same way. They sit there through the cycle and if traffic’s really heavy, it will drop back and serve that turning movement off the main line. But typically our main goal is to move as much traffic as possible on 158.
Do the 158 signals talk to each other in any way? How does that work?
We have basically four, coordinated signal systems on the Outer Banks. Kitty Hawk and Southern Shores signals are paired together in one big coordinated area. Kill Devil Hills and Nags Head are connected together. Manteo has its own coordination system. And the signalized intersections at Whalebone Junction are in their own little signal system because they’re so close together. And when you get into each coordinated signal system — for example, Kitty Hawk and Southern Shores — there is what we call a “master controller.” It’s located at the Welcome Center intersection, which has the heaviest volume. That master controller is connected by fiber optics to all the signals in Kitty Hawk and all the signals in Southern Shores. So as demand increases at any one of those signals, the master controller recognizes it, and it changes its timing plan to accommodate it and try to move the traffic more efficiently.
And I assume that’s probably your most troublesome interchange, because all the summer traffic goes through there. I assume it just tries to push as many cars through as possible in either direction. And then, does it also know what’s happening further on down the road? Is Eckner already queued up thinking, “We have another batch of cars coming, let’s make sure we’re green when they get here?”
Absolutely. And if it’s all timed perfectly. And everything is working 100% correct when you enter that signal system… say you’re sitting at the light when you come of the bridge at the Chevrolet dealership. If that light turns green, when you start progressing, if you’re traveling the speed limit, you should be able to hit greens all the way around, and go south and keep right on going until you get to the Kill Devil Hills area. And that’s how it works when everything is perfect. And you know how often that ever happens is sometimes very rare. But that is the intent and the design of it: to move that traffic continuously through that area.
So what things happen to prevent that from happening? Because sometimes it feels like you hit every red light.
Well, what happens, there’s some equipment issues that could be a problem. Typically, the loop sensors in the pavement, you have a detector that puts the call on the controller and lets it know a vehicles is sitting there. Sometimes, if it malfunctions or has an issue, it will place a call there as kind of a safety function, so it thinks there’s a car there even though there it isn’t. And if it worked the other way, people would pull up there and it would never get the green light. Then you’d have issues with people running the light. So there’s equipment-side malfunctions that can [disrupt flow]. Two, if you’re exceeding the speed limit, you’re outrunning the timing. So, you’ll get to the next signal before it can turn green. Or, conversely, if you travel slower than the speed limit, you’re falling behind with the timing. So it’s always best to drive the posted speed limit as much as possible. But in summer time, congestion or vehicle breakdowns or an accident – something as simple as someone being pulled off to the side of the road or getting ticketed by police — anything can disrupt it at any moment.
And by speed limit, you mean 50 mile per hour. Not 55 .. or 57 or 59…
That’s correct. The actual, posted speed limit.
But the bypass, what’s so frustrating in summer, you can have a person going 65 in one lane and 35 in the other. I don’t know if that’s unique to here or not, but I guess it would disrupt flow as well.
Exactly. And this is a huge problem for the Outer Banks. You have people who are residents who are traveling back and forth to work, and then the tourists who’re in no hurry to get anywhere. They’re looking for a place to eat or the next attraction to go to. It’s a huge mix. It’s a conflict between the two of them. Maybe not a verbal conflict, but conflicting speeds and such.
So what about Corolla. There’s two lights up there, are they connected in any way?
No. we call it ‘free run’ when a signal is out by itself. Those are so far apart, there’s nothing that would be beneficial in connecting them. Because, one, there’s so much distance between the two of them — so much time can be lost or gained in there — it’s not valuable to have them connected. But each individual intersection has its own set of signal timing plans. And all of that is designed off the speed limit, the width of the intersection, the number of lanes, the amount of turning movement traffic — all of that’s taken into account to come up with the signal plan for that specific intersection.
So there are signals that people swear are slower, or faster. Is that we’re talking about now?
Absolutely. Because your bigger intersections — like at Colington Road, for example — the distance across the intersection is a lot further than, say, the intersection at 3rd street. So a lot of that is taken into consideration as to the amount of time it takes for vehicle to clear. So some do move faster than others.
Well, 3rd street to me, it feels like I sit forever. Is that because it’s a shorter light? Or is that because I’m going left and the other traffic goes straight?
That could be depending on what the master controller is telling it to do at the time. If it’s got a lot of traffic demand in certain areas, it will keep the light green a little longer [on 158] to make sure the traffic from other intersections moves past 3rd.
So the master controller is measuring traffic as it comes through 158. How’s that work?
It’s using the vehicle sensors in the road to count cars. As a vehicle passes, it counts it, and it compiles all that information. And our Raleigh unit does this for us, but they create a master plan where there are certain vehicle count thresholds where it will switch form one plan to the next to move traffic most efficiently. So they get the vehicle counts, and they set up the tresholds, and design and change the plan as to what’s needed.
Is that like a seasonal thing?
It doesn’t change based on dates or times. It’s all built into the amount of traffic.
So if X number of cars start going, we’re gonna make the lights behave another way, but always with the intent to move as many cars as possible. And therefore the bypass is going to take precedence over all other streets, 99% of the time.
Absolutely.
Like, I always hate missing Helga. Or is that human nature that the light that takes forever is always the one that you’re stopped at?
I don’t know if any light is really any faster or slower than the other. A lot of it is driver perception. Anytime you’re stopped in traffic, time moves so much slower than it does when you’re actually moving. We had one guy, a complaint who called in, and he said, “I sat here for this song. I listened to all of AC/DC’s ‘Thunderstruck’ before the signal changed.” And we were definitely able to determine that if he listened to that whole song – all four minutes and 20 seconds – then he was correct that something wrong was going on there. And it was a detecting malfunction, and we got it all cleared up. But we definitely have to stay on top of maintenance for it to stay at peak performance.
Does that change during the seasons? Is there more maintenance in summer because it’s switching around more often? Or do you try to wait for winter when things are less busy. O used to be.
It’s all electrical contractors and stuff. Machines fail when they decide to fail. Sometimes you get new equipment that fails in six months. And sometimes you got stuff out there running for 10 years with no issues. It’s just the nature of electrical equipment as far as that goes.
I would think the weather would be more troublesome. Do you notice more issues on, say, Hatteras Island?
Yes. Intersections that are the closest to the ocean are always the most troublesome. We constantly fight corrosion in those intersections. You can build something tight as possible, seal it up, and have the best plan for combatting salt corrosion and that stuff will still get in the cabinet and eat up electrical wires and damage components. Plus, the ones closest to the beach have more wind damage — winds shaking the arms, shaking the heads, sometimes wires will rub and lose connection. So, yeah, the Hatteras Island signals take a lot more punishment than the ones up on 158, especially Kitty Hawk where they’re a little farther form the ocean.
When did they put the arms in? I feel like they’re pretty new, right?
I’ve been with the DOT 20 years now. And we started putting in metal pole mast arms when I first got here, and I think we’ve got all but two or three complete. I think Satterfield landing on 158 is an old span wire signal; and the two signals on the beach road are span wire signals. But the rest all have metal mast arms. And that was to help as much as possible with damage during storms and stuff like that.
I’ve seen those things just shimmy. They bounce like curb feelers.
Yeah. We’ve had two failures that I know of in recent memory. One was at the outlet mall. That pole developed a crack in it and a deputy noticed one night, the wind was blowing pretty hard, and it had a six foot gallop in the arm. And we went up the next day and realized there was an issue there and there was a crack in the weld. And our most recent snow storm , I think it was January of this eyear, the mast arm at Adams Lane was swaying up and down almost 6 feet. And I saw the TikToks and Facebook videos on that. It was amazing to see something that was not designed to shake, move that much. We have ordered some, basically, some aero-foils, like the spoiler on the back of a car, that we’ll mount to those mast arms to stabilize them in the wind and prevent that from happening again.
So what do you hate more? Summer or winter? What’s the biggest headache?
They both have issues. Weather in the winter. Traffic in the summer. and then dealing with hurricanes in the fall. Every season has issues and they can be at any time. I was down at the beach for the first flight celebration in 2003. I was the hottest I’d ever been at the beach and the coldest id’ ever been, and it was all in the same week in December. The weather varies so much, and the wind is a big issue along with that.
So you’re the guy fixin’ this tuff when something happens. You’re the one has to climb up or crack the box or whatever that is.
Yeah. I have a team of six guys who stay at the beach. I’ve got two technicians dedicated to the Outer Banks and the coastal counties. It’s a daily job to keep it running.
So, what about today? It’s March 11. I know we’ve had a busier winter than ever.
Nothing unusual today. We had a pedestrian push button fail, but we got that taken care of and repaired within a couple of hours.
How bad is the complaint department. Is your phone blowing up regularly?
Not so much this time of year. When the summer traffic starts to pick up we get more complaints. It seems there’s a whole lot of stuff people will put up with through winter time, and then the summer time comes and traffic gets heavier and the demand is there for us to do something or they recognize problems quicker than we can. We do run a preventative maintenance program and we go through the signal system from stem to stern twice a year to try and combat this as much as possible.
And has social media changed how you find out about stuff? Do you see it on Facebook or Tik Tok before your phone rings?
Exactly. I’ll get a text message, somebody sees something on Facebook and shoots it to me. And we can head it off at the pass sometimes before the phone rings. But social media has changed everything. And people having the ability to instantaneously post something has changed our response times for a lot of things. I’ll it’s helped more than anything else being able to get out there and respond as quickly as possible.
We’re having our busiest off-season ever. Have you noticed nay data that supports that? Either from the signal numbers or day-to-day events?
They’re up a little bit from what we’ve seen. We’re getting a lot of feedback from the National Park Service and others that we stay in touch with a lot that visitation is up. But, especially last year, you’d have thought with COVID, everything would be a lot slower than it was. But it was still breakneck summer pace. We didn’t notice anything different as far as the amount of travel and the amount of travelers.
Well we’re way up. But that must mean you’re doing a good job, right?
We hope so. We try to anyway.
Word is the DOT will do new research this spring and early summer.
The regional timing squad out of Raleigh, who go out and design our timing plans for the master controllers, they perform periodic checks and verify those numbers, make tweaks where necessary. And they’ll do that at least every two years. We try to get them to come and help us out as much a possible because there will be intersections where we’ve made minor adjustments and get it all incorporated into the big plan to make sure it works as well as possible.
Is it safe to assume they’ll show an increase in traffic?
Yeah. It may. I haven’t looked at the most recent numbers, but I would anticipate some minor tweaks. And we work in seconds. Because it only takes a couple of seconds to travel the length of a football field. so there are minute tweaks that need to made at a lot of locations to optimize everything.
So these guys look at the big picture from Hatteras to Corolla, and you guys are the boots on the ground doing the smaller adjustments. And every couple of years you coordinate to make sure the strategy still works – add a second here, take a second from there.
Absolutely.
Any chance we get more stop lights?
Well things have sort of slowed down at the beach as far as that goes. There was a lot of growth at one time, where a lot of new developments were coming in. Like the Lowe’s. When it came to Kill Devil Hills they had to have a traffic signal there to be able to manage the amount of traffic that they were causing to increase on Landing Drive. So unless there’s some major industry coming in, we’re at a point right now where not really adding a lot of new signals.
And of course, the target coming into 5th, they have a signal already. And if the goal is to keep traffic moving on 158, you’re probably avoiding adding any more lights.
Yeah. Our grand plan would be to not add any more than we absolutely have to. But when target gets finished, we’ll have to look at that signal and make sure the traffic at the 5th Street intersection is optimized as best as possible. Because I can see that location generating a lot more traffic than the Kmart did.
Is French Fry Alley the biggest pain in the butt? Or is it really the Kitty Hawk zone?
Day to day, French Fry Alley is an issue. Peak summer, Kitty Hawk/Southern shores comes into play. The Friday/Saturday traffic that’s headed to Corolla, that’s the headache there. French fry Alley is seven days a week people trying to get into those locations. So that’s always kind of a busy area.
I guess the worst traffic is the one you’re dealing with. What is your nightmare scenario then?
I don’t know that I have a nightmare scenario. You learn with the Outer Banks, you learn that it comes and goes. The nightmare scenario on a grander scale is anything that would happen to one of the major structures, one of the bridges, that leads to the Outer Banks. That would be more of an issue for my department, personally, than any of the signal stuff.
I was thinking about those times in storms when everything’s out. But I guess at that point, people know that everything’s out. And y’all know what you need to do, then, too.
Yeah. Exactly. Storm response is a big thing for us. And Dare County always does really well. I’d like for them to sometimes evacuate a little bit sooner, so that we can manage traffic a little bit better, but they’ve never put us in a predicament where we couldn’t handle it. And conversely, getting back into the county, we’ve got priority to get back in and do as much work as possible. And we have two signal companies on call 24/7 to come roll in and assist us and get things going as soon as possible. But we can only work as fast as the power company can restore us power. We can’t determine a malfunction until we have power back at the intersection after an emergency or a hurricane.
I guess if everything’s out, it’s not necessarily your responsibility.
If it’s blinking it’s my problem. If it’s completely dark, it’s the power company’s problem. And we have a fantastic working relationship with Dominion Power and Tideland Electric Co-op. They cover Dare Mainland and Hatteras. These situations take all hands on deck to get everything back up and running, and becoming prepared for everyone to return to the beach safely.
Any certain signals that’s are a particular pain in the butt?
The one at the Welcome Center in Kitty Hawk. It’s just because there’s so much left-turn summer traffic heading toward Corolla. That one can be a thorn in your side. And also, we’re dealing with capacity issues of NC 12 heading north. You’ve got, really, a two-lane road – even though there’s a center turn lane. But you can only get so much traffic up there and that creates an issue. And it’s probably the one causing the most trouble in summer.
I’m sure putting some ops there has helped keep thing moving.
It does. In both directions. If there’s a police officer there to make sure the intersection doesn’t get cluttered up with vehicles, snarling traffic in both directions. So the police department has done an excellent job of keeping that clear and keeping traffic moving.
Sounds like we complain about the lights but a lot of situations are a byproduct of human behavior. Whether it’s going too fast or slow, or blocking an intersection.
Folks complain about the signal timing, but there’s a million reasons why people are stuck in traffic today. You see it on interstates: all it takes is a person to brake-check or slow down in a lane because a car cuts them off, and it can balloon into a traffic jam.
It’s like the old Milo Spriggs updates. I’m sure you remember those.
Oh yeah. During summer, we try to listen out for potential issue and he’s on top of it as much as we are.
So what can folks do to avoid red lights?
Be patient. Drive the speed limit. Be courteous to other drivers out there. Because your action can kind of derail the whole machine and cause issues. If everyone drives responsibility we can take care of the human factor, anyway.
I’m thankful for every light that lets me go left. Helga street is my saving grace. Are you as amazed as I am at the number of people who try to turn left onto the bypass?
Yeah. And it puzzles me. If got a traffic signal there, nine times out of 10 that signal will get you out into traffic faster than an unsignalized intersection.
_______________________________________________________________
LOCAL KNOWLEDGE
Homegrown historian Scott Dawson may have solved America’s oldest mystery. But he’s not done digging yet.
You know the tale. In 1587, English explorer John White left behind 115 settlers on Roanoke Island, including his own granddaughter — Virginia Dare, the first English child born in the New World. When he came back three years later on a resupply mission, the colony had vanished, leaving the word “Croatoan” carved on a post. That much we can all agree on. It’s what happened to those ill-fated immigrants that remains a matter of debate, as a range of experts hunt for clues using everything from digital mapping to DNA, genealogy to shovels and sifters.
Some say they migrated to “Site X” — a proposed fort on the Chowan River that never came to fruition. Others believe they shacked up with the Lumbee tribe even farther west. But ask Hatteras Island native and amateur historian/archeologist Scott Dawson, and he’ll say they’re all wrong, that the colonists were never lost at all. That they sought refuge among Hatteras Island, home to Manteo’s more familiar friendly tribe. And moreover, that the “cryptic” carving was actually a very clear set of directions.
“I don’t know why, but somewhere along the line they decided to teach in schools that nobody knows what the word ‘Croatoan,’ means,” says Dawson. “That’s what made it a ‘mystery.’ Because, if you said, ‘By the way, ‘Croatoan’ means Hatteras, and they’ve been interacting with these people for years.’ If we told them the real story nobody would say they were lost. Everyone would say what I say. So, if that’s the case, why not go down and dig? So we did.”
Every spring since 2010, Dawson’s Croatoan Archaelogical Society has performed annual digs on Hatteras Island with the help of Dr. Mark Horton of the University of Bristol, uncovering thousands of artifacts — including several notable 16th century finds. This summer, Dawson published a book on their work, which he says settles his case once and for all.
More than a piece of local history, The Lost Colony and Hatteras Island offers a pulled back perspective that covers the early years of New World exploration, from the political motivations to the differences in approach. At the same time, it updates the interactions between explorers and indigenous peoples over five distinct voyages. The tribes that helped — the mistakes that hurt. And the idea that for all the focus on Roanoke Island, the heart of the story lies 30 miles south.
“I’m from Hatteras, and I didn’t know they landed there before they went to Roanoke,” says Dawson. ”That’s sad. It’s this massive piece of American history that Hatteras was involved with, and instead they just replaced it with Roanoke Island. That’s not right.”
We sat down with Dawson to find out how a local history buff spawned an international excavation — and what’s next for future digs. — Matt Walker
This interview was conducted in August 2020. An edited version appears in Milepost Issue 9.3
You grew up in Buxton, correct?
I did. I live in KDH now. I’ve lived all over, but I went to college at the University of Tennessee and I actually graduated high school up in Virginia.
Have you always been an amateur history buff?
Not at all. When I was a kid, all I wanted to do was surf and mess with tourist girls. But I guess I got into it late in high school. And I was really into it during college and ever since. It’s kind of funny: I broke my foot and couldn’t do anything. And I had some Civil War books sitting there and I started reading constantly. And after I healed, I continued to do it.
So it started with Civil War stuff. I was in school in Virginia, and it was like “that’s right behind our baseball field,” which made it a little easier to be interested because it happene nearby. And I had family in the Civil War, like a lot of people, so I read about that. And then it just branched out to all over the world. I read about Che Guevara in Cuba. Lenin. It became something to do before I fell asleep at night. And when I started to read about stuff here, a lightbulb went off: like “Wait a minute. I know where that creek is.” When you have that intimate knowledge of the local geography, and you sit down, and you read read John White (artist/explorer/governor, 1585 & 1587), Arthur Barlowe (exploration leader, 1584) and Thomas Harriot (translator, 1585) —these guys who came over here in the 16th century – it’s different than a historian from Nebraska reading it. Because you’re like “Two waters colliding? That’s diamond shoals.” And I don’t think anybody else had done that before me. So I started interviewing all the construction guys and talking to old people and studying the old maps. It was almost like that Netflix show, Outer Banks, where the guy’s looking for the gold. It’s not too far off from how I was; I was a surf rat who read a lot, and then I got into something. And it was like “Holy shit!’ and the more you study it, the more you go “This is a possibility” so we got some professionals down here to start digging and ‘Holy crap, I was 100% correct.” It was exactly what everything led to. It blew up into an international dig, and 10 years later, I’m talking to the New York Times and Fox News.
How long were you investigating on your own before getting the University of Bristol involved?
I started researching when I worked at Festival Park back in 2006. And I was very familiar with the story before that, but I got access to the primary sources when I was there because they have the Outer Banks History Center, which I’m now on the board of. That history center is like a treasure trove I didn’t know anything about. They have aan stuff they’ll pull out for you. It’s not utilized enough; people should go there more. But I worked there. I was dressed up in the blacksmith shop, firing cannons on the ship and whatnot. It was fun. and when that was done, I’d go to the history center for an hour and start reading and I’m learning all this amazing stuff. It was like a drug. I couldn’t stop. And this whole time, I’m going “How come this wasn’t taught in school? Why does nobody know about this? Why isn’t anyone saying anything? It’s right here and it’s crystal clear.” I don’t have an answer for that. So in 2007 wrote a diffrent book, called Croatoan: Birthplace of America. I self-published it with Coastland Times. I sold the first 500 copies all in like a month. And in that book, I laid the case for what happened from the history — no archaeology. Just according to the primary sources, I laid it all out my whole argument for why they went to Hatteras.
Just to clarify: you propose the Lost colony was never lost. They went to Hatteras—or Croatoan – because they had an existing, friendly relationship. That they left a message indicating that. And that John White understood that message and was on his way to find them when he was blown off course. And if he had made it, there would be no mystery today because he would have recorded what he discovered. But because he was blown off course and nobody showed up for 100 years after, we’re left to fill in the blank.
Yes. And I don’t know whose fault this is. And I don’t want to point fingers. But they decided to teach in schools that nobody knows what the word “Croatoan” means. They say it’s this cryptic message left by the colony. Is it a body of water? Is it whatever? And they’ve said this stuff on the History channel. As recently as last week, Newsweek regurgitated this bullshit. And I don’t know how that happened. But that lie has been going on for 80 years. And that should never have happened. When you read the primary sources: there’s no mystery at all where Croataon was. For example, the very same document that mentions the birth of Virginia Dare – which, by god, they got that part right – it says that Croatoan is an island three separate times. It also says it’s where Manteo was born and that the people of the island are friends. And before that, with Richard Grenvile and Ralph Lane and Arthur Barlow and Thomas Harriot, and White, and everybody that comes over here that talks about Croatoan, they give the latitude and longitude. Of the inlets and everything. So to act like nobody knows what it means – that’s what made it a mystery. Because if you said: by the way this word means “Hatteras” and they’ve been interacting with these Indians for years and Manteo is from there. And conversely, the mainland wanted to kill the settlers — if we told them the real story— nobody would say they were lost. Everyone would say what I say. So, if that’s the case, why don’t you go down and dig. And we did. And we found them. It’s really that simple. It’s so simple that it’s unbelievable. But people want this really complicated answer —that they split into four groups and all this stuff — but it’s just not the case.
That’s crazy. So you looked at primary source reports from the time of all these people. Why do you think nobody else has come to the same conclusion?
They have. It’s just that I was really loud about it. [laughs] There’s a lot of people – at least local people – in Hatteras, in Manteo, in Nags Head. Because it doesn’t take a genius to sit down and read a document. I’m not the first person to say it. I’m just the first person to scream it — you know what I mean? Because I thought if that’s the case, we got to go! We got to dig this up. Because between the hurricanes and these 27-bedroom houses going up, it’s going to get destroyed. I mean, I’m from Hatteras and I didn’t know they landed there before they went to Roanoke. That’s sad. It’s this massive piece of American history that Hatteras as involved with, and instead they just replaced it with Roanoke Island. That’s not right.
I wonder how much of that is just page space? Because I grew up in Virginia Beach, right next to Seashore State Park. Now it’s called First Landing because that’s where John Smith stopped on the way to Jamestown. But I never heard that either. But I always assumed I never heard about the Lost Colony because I grew up in Virginia not North Carolina. But maybe it’s just, “We can only make text books so thick, focus on the first permanent settlement.”
Yeah. Maybe. Who knows? At this point, the ‘why” doesn’t matter. The point is it happened, I’m from Hatteras, and I’m going to say it — of course. For example, on Fourth of July, Manteo reads this passage by Arthur Barlow talking about ‘grapes in the wash.’ And how it’s such a land of plenty – this beautiful description of the Outer Banks. But it’s not Roanoke Island. It’s Hatteras. Because the next paragraph, he says they sailed north to another island called Roanoke. And they know that. And it says the ocean is on one side, the sound is on the other. That’s not Roanoke either. So, it’s not like I’m arguing this ambiguous, opinionated thing. It’s fact. So this irritation builds up like “Man. If we did dig them up. I would finally have the voice to explain all this.”
So how did you get University of Bristol and Dr. Mark Horton involved?
It wasn’t too long after I worked at Festival Park that he came by for this ‘twinning’ ceremony between Manteo and Bideford. And the book was out amongst the history nerd circles, so people said, go see Scott Dawson. So he came down to Buxton. And I was like “Oh shit, I better find something.’ And I had three sites I’d spoken with property owners. One in Frisco, one I Hatteras Village and one in Buxton. And I was really hyped on the one in Frisco. That’s where I thought it was going to be. And there was a bit of Native American stuff in there but it turned out to be a Mid-Woodland Era site, which is like the year 500. It’s neat, and we did dig there and we intend to continue just to just to learn more. But I didn’t know the difference between Native American pottery 400 years ago versus 1500 years ago then, because I’m not an archaeologist. But I do now. At that point, I didn’t know. I just knew that I found stuff here before when I was pulling a shrimping net. It seemed like a good spot. But at least we found something. But we didn’t even get to Hatteras, because we went to Buxton next. And we ended up finding 3 skeletons in the bottom of a test pit that was 2 meters by 2 meters. It was like a little hot tub. And we found 3 bodies in the bottom. And they were Native Americans, but they had English stuff with them. But none of the English stuff in the grave was very dateable – it was an orange piece of pottery, an a musket ball, and horse bride. And, then a lot of native stuff. Pottery. Pipes. But those bones got sent to Raleigh, that’s a rule, to make sure it wans’t some unsolved murder. But you can tell that any way because you’re digging through these perfect cake layers of soil. And they were sealed under a midden, which is basically everything they threw out. Which on Hatteras is a lot of deer bone and sea shells, which last a long time. So you end up with 2 feet of shells, hundreds of pieces of pottery, and pipes – whatever got tossed. And under that was the bodies. So the bodies had been there long enough that people forgot. And the bodies were older than the midden, which was about 1650. So these people died at least 10 year prior. So it fit the age where, if these people died at 70, they could’ve been alive in the 1580s. But that kind of speculation can get you in trouble. So you don’t go running to the press. But that was our first test pit in 2009. And they said “That looks promising, lets come back.”
And they came back every spring up to 2019?
Yes. But that test pit wasn’t really a full dig. But when they came back the next year is when we did a real dig thaw a 5 x 3 meters. Then it was 5 x 8 very year. And then more people .
And they were real archaeological digs?
Yeah. In the beginning it was Horton and a phD student and a bunch of American volunteers. And the second year he brought in more grad students. And the third year, even more. And years four on it got stupid. Super professional, an organized, and tones of college students because it was really clear we had found them.
So how did these digs corroborate your theory? It sounds like the primary sources said ‘This is what they would likely do.” And the dig is the evidence that says “this is what happened.” Is that the difference?
Yes. So before we started digging, say back in 1988, you had Dr. Mark Phelps. He came in and he’d been on Hatteras Island in 1974 when kids accidentally uncovered a mass grave with 110 Native Americans in it. So he knew there was a large native American presence on Hatteras. In the 90s, he was digging on a site in Buxton that dated to about 1650. However, he also found a gunlock from the 1580s — a very dateable item – but it was in a layer of about 1650. And he also found a signet ring with a lion on it, also from the 1580s. But it’s a little ambiguous. The items were from the 1580s but he found them in a layer from the 1650s, so maybe someone traded them. Maybe they just had old crap on them form someplace else. Not super likely, but probably. And we had the same problem. We found 1580s stuff in a 1600s layer. Tidewater pipes and venetian glass beads, a rapier and all this other stuff. It’s interesting. And it could just items they hung onto for while. What we need is a layer of pure 1580s stuff with nothing from the 1600s. And we ultimately found that — and that’s’ the key.
Of course, we went deeper than that. And when he did, he got sterile soil. Which means before that, they lived someplace else on the island. And based on what we saw, the Native Americans would live some place for 40 years and then scoot along. And after a while, they’d return to where they were. So you’d find stuff from the 1700s, then nothing, then the 1500s. And you have to a lot of digging to figure that out. But long story short: we found a layer of pure 1500s. And it was magic. We got over 600 post holes from long houses. So it’s like the heart of town, that’s a lot of buildings. And side-by-side were English buildings. So now it’s not just English artifacts coming up, like the smelted copper bun and the fire bar and the Nuremburg coin and all that stuff. So we’re getting artifacts from the 1500s in a layer from the 1500s. And there’s none of the glass beads or tidewater pipes or super common stuff from the 1600s. And it’s replaced with Native American stuff which is way cooler in my opinion. We also found a few arrowheads, which Native Americans abandoned completely by the mid 1600s. They were using guns and lead shots. We still had a problem though: in the 1580s the Lost Colony wasn’t the only English voyage to Hatteras. So how do we know it’s from 1587 and not 1585 or even 1584. Because all of them spent some time on Hatteras Island. And the answer as in those building. Because in 1584, it was a recon mission that wasn’t’ meant to last. They didn’t build houses. They lived in military field tents. In 1585, they did build houses on Roanoke island but the group that lived on Hatteras Island was only there for a month. They were sent here to spot ships under Edward Stafford. And they did — they spotted Francis Drake who saved them. But they didn’t build houses. They didn’t even have time to construct any before they left. But the metallurgy really put the nail in the coffin. If you’re in a scout party sent to spot ships and feed yourself, why are you going to bother smelting copper and making thousands of cooper gingerbread men? So this is somebody who’d been there for a really long time. Also, the scouting party – and I don’t know this for fact – but they probably set up on the ocean side of the island. They probably didn’t go completely native and live in the village surrounded by Indian houses. But that’s what we found: mixed architecture. The natives didn’t have square post holes. Square beams are an English construction. They hewed logs. The Indians didn’t do that. They didn’t have iron. And it’s difficult to hew a log into square with fucking seashell. So they bent spent into an arc – which was impressive. So the building style is English and is full of English items, as well.
But it was weird, because we expected the colony to set up on their own chunk of island and not be in the Indian village. We thought maybe once they broke down, a few dozen moved in with the Indians in their houses, but not build houses in the Indian village. That was unexpected.
And we ended up finding out this story. So, my fourth grade teacher’s dad ran a bar in Frisco in the 30s. And he found a Nuremburg token as well on accident. And he gave it to an archaeologist named William Haag in the 1950s. Mark got really interested in that because we found a Nuremburg token in the Indian village in Buxton. And they found some in Roanoke Island, as well, that matched up. And mark and I were moving a bookshelf in the Hatteras Island library and found Haag’s manuscript underneath. And I gave the latitude and longitude of where the token had been found. We went over there with a drone. And the Discovery Channel was with us at the time. And Nat Geo was at the dig site for the magazine. So Discovery got hold of this super-ridiculous, expensive drone. And we flew it over where the token was found in the 30s and we found a fort.
Is that the survivor camp in the book?
Yes. And we were gonna dig there this past spring, but that’s next. But they got really excited about it. It’s perfectly north south aligned. We went out and measured it. Why is there a token there? It’s not an Indian village. And I don’t want to give away too many details, but it’s the perfect place to put a survivor’s camp. You’re protected by high dunes, there’s a nice cove like a harbor. And you can see the Spanish but they can’t see you. Quick access to the inlet. It all makes sense. But we never touched it because were still digging Buxton and finding stuff. But we want to keep digging where are and get a look at the older Native American sites just before the Colony so we can see the impact that the English had on the tribe. To show how their diet changed and all that.
And that’s we looked at the last time mew we we dug. We went into a place around the 1400s that’s’ pure native. But there’s a layer of 1700s that’s on top. And it’s neat because they’re still eating deer and turtle and all that stuff. But the amount of birds in the midden goes way up after they get firearms — which makes sense. And being form Hatteras, it’s kind of funny they ate so many rare birds and turtles.
So what’s the magic bullet. Is it a skeleton that’s purely English from 1600? Is it DNA testing? Is it genealogy?
The skeleton thing would be good. But that may have already happened. Back in the 80s they built a house in the 80s that’s on top of a hill. And the Native Americans – at least on hatteras island – they never buried their dead on top of hills. They always buried them parallel to creeks. And that’s true all over the tidewater area. They buried them at the base of hills next to creeks and water. Burying on top of a hill is a very English thing to do. So in the 80s, someone built a house on top of a hill and they found a bunch of skeletons. And they took them and put them in hefty bags and covered them with dirt. That could’ve been the colony. But they didn’t’ report it, because it would’ve stopped the building. I heard about it as a kid, and all I can think of was: that house must be haunted. But looking back now, knowing what I know and what we’ve found nearby, it might’ve been them.
But, archaeology is not like TV where there’s this smoking gun — this one ite, that proves everything — this one thing you hold up like Indiana Jones. It’s more of a culmination of things. And finding loads of things is better than finding one thing. So I’d argue we’ve already found what we need to.
Obviously, there’s other groups doing different stuff – like Site X– have they responded yet?
Well, Brent Lane, who found the patch on the map that that focused on , he’s actually been on our digs. And he’s also a member of the Croatoan Archaeological Society. And he was there around the time we found a Nuremburg token, and he said ‘This is amazing.’ He told me about abou Site X a few days before he told the news. And it’s cool that he found a patch on the map. But the map is from 1585. And John White is who made the map with Thomas Harriet. The Colony was in 1587. They hadn’t even discussed bringing a colony in 1585. In the primary sources, there’s Ralph Lane’s account from 1585, where he’d been attack by Indians from Bertie. They’re called the Mandoagg. And they had showered Lane and his men with arrows while they were sailing down the Chowan River. And the Mandoagg were allies with the Secotan, who Lane went tower with and murdered their chief. So he wanted to put a fort where the rivers came together; which is where the patch is. And he said, in the sources, he said how he wanted to do that. But they never did.
And that’s what that map is. But because they never actually built that fort, but White had already painted it, so they put a patch over it. It’s basically 16th-century Wite-Out. And when they dug, they didn’t’ get anything beyond 1650. They found border ware, which is a type of English pottery that was around in the 1500s and 1600s. It’s hard to tell the difference between 1550 and 1650. But you can date it by what’s associated with. And everything else in that layer was 1650 forward. And they made a big deal out of it, but they’ve kind of quieted down.
What about the DNA?
Everyone in North Carolina and Virginia claims some level of DNA. The problem is you don’t have any genealogical records in NC before 1655. But even if they did, it’s not likely the children of any survivors would have English surnames — or even first names. More than likely Virginia Dare’s grandson was named “he who burns easy.” What you’re gonna have is what Lawson found: Indians who had blue eyes who said their ancestors were white people how could speak out of a book.
Basically, it’s a 100 year gap. Any number of people could’ve procreated with native people in that time?
Exactly. There’s too many variables. It doesn’t mean they’re wrong. “My grandpa told me this!” Maybe it’s true. But you can’t prove it. because there’s this huge gap. And we’re talking about science here. We’re not on the speculation train. And you can’t make this gigantic leap from 1650 back.
Have the other researchers responded?
No. they’re not to reach out to me. I’m the antichrist to them. [laughs]
Brent Lane came to my book signing. But he’s not part of their group. He’s just a historian. And a good person. He found a spot on the map and reported it. And that’s cool. But it has nothing with the Colony. If it did, I would say so. I wish it did. That would be awesome.
Why is there not more cooperation between the different researchers?
I don’t know. My early experiences with Fist Colony Foundation weren’t positive, so I never reached out to them. I get along with some of them. And Fred Willard was pushing DNA. I wanted to dig in Hatteras, so I did.
So why did you start the Croatoan Archaelogical Society?
That was Mark’s idea. Mark is very professional. And after 2009, after we found those bodies, he sat down with my wife and me and six other people, and he said you need to form a non-profit. When you have that, you’re the local liaison for us when we come over. So we find places for researchers to stay, feed them, provide tools, we built the sifters in my garage. We had a pizza party and built them. In the beginning that’s how it was. It’s so much easier now . But in the beginning there was a wood shortage on the island because it was after Irene. And they were rebuilding the Comfort Inn so I asked them for the leftovers. Those first sifters were built out of the discarded fence from the Comfort Inn. Those have all been replaced with better stuff. But we still have one of the original ones. It’s got a green rope on it. And everyrone on the dig is convinced it’s lucky. Except for mark. He’s like “That’s nonsense” and we know that its nonsense. But ever time we find something cool, it’s like, ” Green sifter strikes again!” But even mark, one time, we got to this one layer and he was like “bring out the green sifter.” It’s kind of an inside joke. But I won’t throw it away.
So it funds your research. Funds your supplies. And it’s you guys working as the face of the research.
That’s right. And we’re not solely concerned with the Lost Colony. We want to do the Croatoan history in general. And everything else – French Indian war – all that stuff we go through on the way down. And after.
Some of the books’ most interesting moments describe what you find on either side. Like, you talk about how the Algonquin dialect was the same for Tidewater, Virginia and the Outer Banks. And some modern linguists have made the same connection with American English.
There were 29 dialects of Algonquin. The one on Hatteras was called the bird dialect. The Secotan were right across the Sound, and they had the wolf dialect. But they also spoke that dialect over in Pamlico county. So the mainland part of dare had the wolf diet. But Pamlico and Hatteras had the bird dialect. So there had to be some back and forth. But I guess it’s not that weird because if you go straight across from Hatteras Island, you’d be at the south end of Mattamuskeet. And the wolf dialect was probably influenced by who the Secotan were next to. And they also had the bird dialect in Currituck. So it’s like a letter C from Currituck, to Nags Head, Hatteras and across the sound in Pamlico. But you have 29 different dialects, and the one we had was in a very small area.
How’d you learn the Algonquin names Was that in the history center?
No. Not at all. That was very difficult. A man named Dr. Blair Rudes spent his whole life doing that and I got lucky and met him before he died. He was the man. If you ever saw the movie New World, with Colin Farrell — horrible movie — but the one saving grace is they used Native American actors from out west, then they asked them to speak Tidewater Algonquin. Of course, they didn’t know it any bettet than we would, so they had to learn their lines from listening to CDs. And those CDs were made by Dr. Rudes. And he sent me a lot of other stuff. And I wish he hadn’t died, because a lot of it I don’t understand. I’m still reading this stuff and to figure it out.
But the first thing I did was look at the people’s names and see ‘which kind of Algonquin is this?’ And Manteo means “to snatch.” And it’s the motion a blue jay does when it divebombs its prey. And it a bird dialect, so it’s Hatteras Island. So is Menatonan. And even David Biers Quinn, who wrote the Roanoke Voyages, which is the Bible on this stuff, he even said Menatonan was the only Croatan was mentioned by name besides Manteo. But he’s wrong. There’s one more, Skico. Who is Menatonan’s son. Wanchese means ‘to take flight off of water. So when I see a bird in the canal take off, I think Wanchese. He’s of the wolf dialect, so he’s probably from Mann’s Harbor.
So, the Secotan had kind of taken over Hatteras in 1582. Wingina sent his brother, Granganimeo, down there to kind of rule over with like 50 bodyguards, Wanchese being one them, so when they took two natives back, Manteo was from Croatoan, but Granganimeo made sure they took one of his dudes, too. Which was Wanchese. That’s why it’s confusing. What Arthur Barlow wrote down, he fucked it all up. He thought there was one tribe. But if you read everything, you figure out what’s going on, especially once you get into the dialects of Algonquin. I didn’t go that deep in the book, I just said what happened. And if anyone has a problem, I can answer it. But if I went that deep into it, nobody would read the book. So I had to just say what happened in chronological order.
Other cool things you discuss are how contact changed native life like diet and weapons. Lie how they clearly move from arrows to gun. And finding brandy bottles. What kind of patterns emerged as you dug?
The natives had nets. They used shells as weights. And they changed to lead because that way’s better, it sinks a lot faster. So the fishing changed. The hunting changed. The diet changed a little. Still eating fish, and deer. The farming doesn’t seem to be affected that much. The seeds are still the same. Pretty much. Some English seeds got introduced that seemed to thrive. And there is one reference to that by Barlowe in 1584 where they said they tested some English peas that grew like 14 inches in six days, so maybe when they came back in 85 and 87 they brought those peas along with because they knew they did well here. And we ended up finding English peas – or seeds for them. We have a botanist in our group, and pumpkin seed are probably most common, but they’re also bigger. not a lot of seeds are gonna make it to now. But for crops it’s beans, corn, squash, pumpkins, peas sunflower seeds and cucumbers. A bunch of different kinds of melons, cantaloupes. One interesting thing we found was peaches. Because those aren’t supposed to be here. That’s not a new world food. However, the Spanish brought peaches into Florida 90 years before this. And the Indians did trade peaches. So maybe the English brought them; maybe they traded with Indians. There’s no way to tell.
The brandy bottles? It’s ridiculous how much brandy they got into. And they continued to like it. Because in the 1600s they’re alcoholics for sure. And then you start to see smokehouses, which is the older Indians’ reaction to the alcoholism. Which is building little sweat lodges for them to go into and burn a bunch of tobacco and try to cure the alcoholism. It doesn’t. But they though it would purify them. They also had the yaupon, the black drink, which make you shit your brains out. And they would take that during a holiday – which was a day of forgiveness. And they would drink that stuff and get the squirts and that was the physical symbol of getting the badness out of their body. And after they all had diarrhea, they would have forgiven themselves for all their wrong-doings. Hatteras still has this, but they call it Old Christmas. Every January 6, Hatteras Islanders go and drink and beat the shit out of each other, and everything’s square after. [laughs]
It’s funny you say that. Because if I say, “They eat seafood, they hunt, they drink too much,” not a whole lot has changed. I don’t know what that says about geography influencing human nature, or humans finding places that fit their personalities. But it’s interesting.
Pretty much. And the funny thing, too, is if you pay real close attention, the very first thing the Indians traded to English, was two piles of fish on Hatteras Island. They came in two ships that first year, and this guy rode up to them in a canoe. And thy said that, after speaking many things not understood – because the guy’s goin’ on in Algonquin – they gave him a shirt and a hat, and let him taste some wine and some meat, and they let him go. And when they let him go, they said he started furiously fishing out of his canoe, and filled the whole thing with fish. And he put it in two piles on the beach, and he pointed to one ship and then pointed to the first pile; then he pointed to the other ship, and pointed to the second pile. Like, “This is for you.” And he left. And they said it was the best fish they’d tasted in all the world.
But its ‘it’s funny to me how perfect it is that the first thing Hatteras Indians gave them was fish.
Well, everywhere people envision Thanksgiving, they think Plymouth rock. But when you talk about this story, it’s the story of native cultures and white people everywhere. It starts with some friendship, ends with some violence.
Well as far as a big meal between Native Americans and English goes, the first one is 1584. They said that the Hatteras Island natives would bring them six freshly killed bucks every day. And coneys, which are rabbits. And those swamp rabbits taste just like pork.
It is analog yof how the new world started. A little bit of feast, followed by a bunch of violence. And largely due to misunderstanding. Because as you point out, the Secotan were aggressive, but the Croatoan were friendly.
And it went both ways. Those 15 guys that were dropped off in ‘86 didn’t do anything. And the Secotan attacked them and killed two of them because, you know, a white boy’s a white boy. Both sides were guilty of, “They look the same, let’s kill ‘em.” And that’s human nature. And if they natives would have dominated in the end, they could’ve. The white people happened to win.
Well, it’s all a matter of perspective. I mean, Virginia Dare is basically the first anchor baby.
Well, I think it would be cool, if they redid the play from the Indian perspective. And start with Virginia Dare as an old woman, and she’s sitting down, telling the story to Indian kids. And she talks about how they came over and go from there. That would be way cooler. Maybe I’ll start my own play in Hatteras. And start it just like that.
I assume there had to be Native American sites in town, correct? Or did they stay south of the bridge or on Roanoke island?
There was a very tiny outpost on Roanoke island. It only had 9 houses. Barlowe lists 9 houses. And what it was a satellite. So Manns Harbor was the real Indian Village. And they had a little camp on north end of Roanoke Island where they’d collect oysters and stuff. But it was like the suburbs of Manns Harbor. They didn’t really live there there in force because there’s a lack of fresh water. It’s very swampy. On Hatteras, they had a natural aquifer there. Not many places have that. And you can’t live without water. They’d frequent there. And they’d camp there for days, but it was more of a suburb. But back then Manns Harbor was a thriving place and Manteo was this little nine-house village that was really part of Manns Harbor.
What about KDH and nags head? Any sites there or are they all down south?
They’re all on the soundside. Colington Island had a significant amount of Indians in the Mid Woodland Period. But we’ve taken pottery samples from all of those. Kill Devil Hills, instead of having shell mixed in, like Hatteras. It has quartz. And it’s older. But whatever happened, not a lot of Indians were living out on the beaches when the English came over. They were all on Hatteras. They had about 1000 people. When Ralph Lane was here, he said the largest village they saw was Chowanoke – which had 700 fighting men. Which is about 1/5th of the population. So 3500 people. But there were only 32 buildings, because the buildings were huge. They had these 60 to 70-foot long houses, with extended families. And we know from Jamestown records, there was about 23 people in a house. So that would be similar here. And Hatteras had a between 15 and 20 in those. And you do the math, and that’s 1000 people. And the English archaeologists say that based on the middens there had to be at least 1000 people on Hatteras. But we’ve lost so much to erosion it’s hard to say for sure. But that quickly dwindled. By 1701, when Lawson went there, they only had 16 fighting men. So did Chowanoke. And many had less. Because disease had ripped them up so much. And that’s maybe 80 to 90 people. And most of them had blue eyes. There was a small pox epidemic that ran through Eastern North Carolina in 1695. And you think about COVID, that’s nothing compared to this. Ninety percent of Native Americans died. And small pox is a horrible way to die. And even that didn’t wipe ‘em out. And on Hatteras, the fact that many had blue eyes, is probably why they survived. Because [those characteristics] would make them a little more immune.
What’s the future of archaeology on the Outer Banks? You just brought up erosion. Is it sort of a race against time?
It is. Because if we become crybabies about building houses, they won’t give us permission to dig at all. You just have to ask to go dig in the part of the yard where they didn’t put a pool. [laughs] It’s one of those things. If you come across as some kind of off-the-wall leftist that doesn’t want people to build houses, you’ll never get permission to dig on their property. So you just have to say, “Hey man, we’re just here for the knowledge. Thank you so much. we just want to salvage a little bit.” And that’s what we’ve been doing. One of the Mid Woodland sites in Frisco got completely ruined by a giant house and a pool. But the let us in before they did it. They said, “Hurry up!” And we said ‘Okay!’
Horton says it’s just a taster of what’s to come. What’s that mean?
Nothing that I can tell you, but it’s all good news. I had to ask him, “I want to put something out. I’m dying to talk about some of this stuff.” And he said, “Just don’t mention A, B and C.” but if you read between the lines, you can read what else we found. But he’ll put it out there. We just need to finish the dig first. I’ll just say that we got ‘em man. Trust me: We got’ em. That’s all I can say.
Any chance one group went to Hatteras, and one went to Site X or somewhere else? And there’s more than one answer?
There’s always a possibility. I think, initially, they all went to Hatteras and their grandkids went wherever. But I don’t think the colonists split up. There’s no evidence for it. Just pure speculation. And there’s no reason to say they went inland either. But had the gone inland they would’ve gone to some place that was at least allies of Croatoan, like Currituck or something.
_________________________
What’s in your wallet? If you didn’t now before, chances are are you do now. With the economy in a slide, more folks are tapping into petroleum-based revenue streams — aka credit cards. Assuming you can get a lender to flow you some dough.
“I know all about being turned down by lenders,” laughs 33-year-old Alex Cohill. “The first time I went to buy a new vehicle, they were like, ‘We can’t give you financing! Your credit score is too low!’”
That was eight years ago. The former financial recruiter had just moved to Nags Head after losing his Pittsburgh gig during the last recession. Strapped with student debt and bad credit, he started researching ways to improve his chances to access more money. He figured out the most direct way was to…go assume even more debt?
“Not really,” says Cohill. “You have to pay the bill off every month. But using credit cards was the easiest way I saw — for me any way — to take advantage of money I was already spending and increase my own personal credit score, which can unlock more ways to save money overall.”
Groceries, gas, a good meal out? It all goes on the right card to gather the greatest benefits. Today, he’s not just chock full of good credit, he’s jam-packed with great info on what cards deliver the best rewards, and how to manipulate them so you can make money on everyday purchases — and save dough on future borrowing. We asked Cohill to run down his top picks for plastic that pays off both in the short-term and for the long haul. — Matt Walker
The following interview took place in April 2020. An edited version appears in Outer Banks Milepost Issue 9.2
Where are you from originally?
I grew up in New Jersey, actually.
How’d you end up here?
Like a lot of people, my family always vacationed here. About 8 years ago, I was working in Pittsburgh and the company I was working for closed my section down. I was in the financial recruiting division. I lost my job. I was working in business development. I got a nice little severance, and I figured I’d move to the beach for the summer and figure stuff out. I was loving it so I stayed here. Met my wife and never looked back.
How did you become a credit card expert? Does it go back to your financial job background?
Maybe. The company I worked for was very large. Long story short, I got an offer to run a struggling office in Pittsburgh and turn it around inside of a year. And then they closed the division 9 months later. So I started caring a lot about personal finance stuff then. And moving down here, obviously things are different. People have to manage their money because of the seasonality of where we live. And so I was younger, and things were a little out of control for me , which I didn’t like. so I started looking at credit cards specifically as a way to take advantage of money I was already spending. And using credit cards was the easiest way I saw – for me any way – to increase my own personal credit score, which can unlock more ways to save money overall. You get better rates on lending if you buy a vehicle ore are fortunate enough to be able to buy a house. So that’s where it started for me.
And that’s when shit hit the fan last time. Now it’s hitting the fan again. So what about credit cards that piqued your interest? And what did you learn?
I always thought I was unique in my ignorance about those types of things. One of the most significant things I’ve learned is that a lot of people are in that same position of ignorance: they don’t know what a credit score is, or that they have one, and that it plays a pretty significant role in what they need. Because there’s nothing more ridiculous, and this happened to me, I wanted to get a new vehicle. And they’re like, “Okay, we can’t give you financing because you’re credit score is so low.” And I was like, “what are you talking about?”
A lot of people don’t realize that not having a credit card can ruin you, too, because you don’t have a record of being a good risk.
Yeah, there’s five different factors that influence your credit score. But the biggest thing learned is what makes what makes up a credit score, and what you can do to positively affect those factors. One’s time. There’s no way you can make time go by quicker and add more successful payment history and age to the accounts you have. The best you can do is responsibly manage the credit you do have, and if you don’t have any, you’re in a good position because you also don’t have any debt — which is ideal in some ways. But there’s a lot of different tiers of credit products. So for a person who has no credit, they have no debt, so a lender would consider them risky because they don’t have anything to go off of. But what they do have is an opportunity to prove themselves. Because they can get something like a secured card. Or some companies give credit cards with lower limits – like $300 or $500 – to prove yourself. And that’s where I delved in.
I had student loans, like so many people, but that was really it. So I didn’t have a lot of credit experience. My first car I bought cash. I lived in a city for years and didn’t need a car after the age of 20. So, until I as 23, I didn’t have any need to figure that stuff out. So what I learned was why credit scores are important. And using a credit card is the easiest way to boost your creit score if it’s non-existent or suffering.
So what’d you do? Apply for a low-number card? Get the best card you can and pay I off? is that the process?
For me, I went to Capital One. They have a reputation for being a lender that will give lines of credit to people who have no credit. But I guess there’s different strategies, and it depends on what you personally are trying to accomplish and where you stand. If you have outstanding debts with missed payments on them, you’re going to have a problem. Anything below basically a 99% payment history is going to be pretty significant as far as points being taken off of your overall credit score. So, if you’re in a position, where you have say, missed payments or no credit at all, a credit company is going to give you a very a low limit – if you’re even approved. So the best place to start is your bank, because they’ll have a secured credit product. Or Discover has a really good secured credit product because it allows you to earn rewards.
Basically when people ask me, friends or whatever, the formula’s not the same for everyone. Depends on what you have going on going into it. For me, I’m fortunate enough to have all my monthly expenses mapped out. So I know where I’m spending my money and I know the credit cards that will give me the greatest return on those expenses. But for a person who’s not in a position to get any credit card they might want, I recommend the Discover card, because it allows you to earn money on your expenses while still being a secured product. And then, unsecures after a year.
So, define a secured product.
If you get a credit card with a $400 limit, you would put down a $400 deposit. And the company would hold that in escrow for a year, and then give you the money back after the secured period is over.
So you spend $400 to have $400. It’s like the training wheels approach.
That’s a great way to put it. It’s an entry level way into having a credit card. And after a year, if you made all your payments on time, they give you the $400 back and you get to keep the line of credit. And they might even increase it to $1000.
So you’re worth taking a risk on. And you can use the card like you originally intended. And I assume that’s like an “emergency” credit card. It doesn’t make a lot of sense to run up a credit card and use it.
Absolutely. Paying interest no your credit card if you don’t need to is just wasting money. So having a secured card, something like that, you build credit to unlock more options as far as a higher tier of lending rates for a car loan or a credit card. If you want to move into a more significant rewards situation. So Discover, is 1% flat cash back on all purchases on a secure Discover card. So that’s 1% of money you won’t make otherwise. And even if you put a $400 deposit down, let’s say you pay $400 a month on groceries, you do that on that card, get your 1%, pay the card off, the total balance resets to zero. Do it again the next month.
And over the course of the year, you put $4800. And you got $48 at the end of the year spending like you normally would.
Exactly right. And once you establish yourself with lenders as a less risky customer, you unlock a lot better products for yourself. So, for me, I have credit cards I use specifically for groceries, and I have a card for any travel related expenses, and then credit cards I use for overall expenses, and then one I use just for restaurants – because I get the highest return in specific rewards that those credit cards offer. Usually it’s percentages or travel points or what have you.
The way to use a credit card is pay it off, right? So you only spend what you know you can pay off, and then you build up in tiers and they trust you enough to give you more money, and you get a loan for this or that. Because if you don’t have a credit card, you go to get a loan on a house and they’re like “no.” Which is almost as bad as being over your head.
Exactly.
So, the best way to use a credit card is to pay it off. So you need to set limits in your head of what you can afford, use only that much, then pay it off to build up tiers of more and more credit and open up opportunities for more loans and better cards.
100%.
So that’s where the training wheel credit cards come in. So once you get past training wheel status: it’s how you use that formula to get more benefits for your money.
Kind of. This is why, when friends ask me, “which should credit card should I get?” I say ‘it depends.’ If you want to be as intense or insane – or as my wife might say , ‘anal’ — as I am, and have different cards you use for every sort of expense, then the first thing a person needs to figure out is where they spend their money right now. That’s the first step: what are you spending money on all the time? And what aligns with your personal monthly expenses. And I think the way to start is to think about the different factors that make up a credit score. Some of the you can work on and some you can’t. Length of accounts is a big factor and anything less than 5 years is considered “still risky.” And that’s not something you can do much about. You also need to consider the percentage of available credit is and how you’re using it. If you have zero dollar sin available credit, you’re not going to get a significant boost to your score. And the amount of available credit over all is another factor, and your payment history, and what types of credit you have. So if you have a car loan, and a personal loan, and a credit card, and student loans, that’s a mixture of different types of accounts that you have opportunities to develop responsibility with. So having no debt and no cards, unless you’re independently wealthy with cash, you’re not really in a position to demonstrate to lenders that you can be responsible. And unless you’re very fortunate to have inherited wealth or earned wealth, then you’re’ going to need a loan at some point to buy a car or a house or an emergency – whatever it is. So, it goes back to “why credit cards?” It’s the easiest thing I could personally tackle sitting in my living room, the easiest first step to positively affect my overall credit rating and my appeal to lenders to want to be in business with me — to give me money at a rate I’m happy with.
So before you go into this, it stands to reason, you want to be paying all your bills. It’s a big ding to be paying your bills. So before you get into credit card debt you want to be paying all your bills to start with.
100%. So I graduated with college with student loans. And you have a grace period before you have to start paying them back. And that time came for me and I was like, “I’m just gonna ignore this for a while.” And I got into some trouble with that obviously. And when I went to apply for a car loan they said my score was too low. And I realized that was dumb on my part. And I knew I couldn’t miss any more payments. But negative payments only stay on your report for seven years, so those don’t appear on my credit anymore, fortunately. But I knew I had to counter balance that somehow. And the way I did that was giving myself opportunity to pay positive payments. And that’s where the credit card came in.
So you’re never too late to start. Within seven years you’ll be out of the woods. You just have to stick to those habits.
100%
So if you’re at training wheel candidate — you have no credit or horrible credit – you get the secured Discover card and you show your trustworthy. And if you keep paying it off you get some benefit.
Exactly.
Is it safe to say that some of the bigger rewards cards also have a hefty interest rate? Or some catch that pays off later? They’re sort of banking on you getting behind some day?
Yeah, that’s a concern. And a lot of the top tier rewards cards come with an annual fee. So that’s where a little bit of math comes in. So, to give you a scenario, I had a friend who wanted a card just for restaurants and entertaining. He goes out to eat a lot. So Capital One has two cards: the Savor Card and Savor One. Saver One is no annual fee and you get 3% back at restaurants. The savor card is $95 and you get 4% back. So, if you’re going to spend more than $9500 a year at restaurants, the Savor card is worth it. Because you’ll get more than 1% back in rewards.
Wow. And $9500 doesn’t’ sound like a lot over a year, That’s $800 a month at restaurants.
Exactly. And American Express for example, has a ‘cash back’ family of cards. So the Preferred Cash you get 6% on groceries — and that’s the best across any card. And that comes with a $95 a year fee. And they have the American Express Cash, which is 3%. So if you think your family spends $1000 a month on groceries, you to think, is my $95 going to be made up by getting 3% more over the course of a year, or not?” And it has other rewards associated, too. Is 3% on gas going to be better than 2%? So you have to start thinking about it – and that’s only if you’re at the position to pick and choose the credit cards you can apply for and hopefully get approved for. And then you have to dedicate those cards to those expenses.
So, if you know you commute a lot, and you know your family eats a lot of groceries, you know that card makes sense. Then you have to decide, is it worth spending the money to get those extra percentages back. And that’s where you do that personal math. But first, you can shop based around your lifestyle.
Right. If you’re a single person living alone, are you going to spend a grand a month on groceries? Probably not. But you might go out to restaurants and bars a lot. So a card that focuses on groceries won’t make sense, but that Savor card might. You have to know your own budget. You have to know your fixed expenses, and you have to know your variable expenses, because if you don’t you won’t be able to make an informed decision about a credit card. But only if you have options. Some people won’t have options. They’ll only have one or two cards they can get, they only have a few hundred bucks to put down on a secured card. And that’s great, because it’s an important first step. But if you are in a position to where you want to start using rewards, you have to know your own budget and where you’re spending your money to make a more informed decision to yield the best results.
So you’ve got a training wheels card – that’s the Discover. You’ve got a couple of options for dining out – the Savor cards — and options for more domestic lifestyle – American Express.
And the Savor card also has rewards for concert tickets, and theater tickets – they’re geared toward people who spend a lot of time going out doing fun things. Probably people that don’t have kids [laughs].
Do most banks have some examples for all these?
Yes and no. The major lenders you think about Chase or American Express, Capital One, Citibank, Barclay’s, Bank of America has a lot of decent cards for being a bank. PNC has a couple that rare worth looking into. So American Express and Chase are more into travel rewards. So they have a lot of products that are geared toward people who travel. And some are affiliate cards – American Express has a relationship with Delta, and Chase is United, and American Airlines is Citi. So people who live in Atlanta, a Delta hub, why would you get a Citi card which is American? Norfolk flies a lot of Delta, too, so they may think of that product too. So they each have some skin in each of the areas, or want to.
So are any of the travel cards better than others?
It depends on what you want to do. Capital One has the “Adventure Card.’ And we haven’t even talked about sign-up bonuses, and that’s an important element. A lot of the more lucrative rewards cards have sign up bonuses attached to them, which is something to consider. And right now the most important consideration people will probably be making is introductory 0.0 APR periods. So, if you’re thinking just travel, the Capital One Venture card is 95 bucks a year. But you get two-times “travel points” per dollar spent. So I spend probably 500 a month on that card specifically — on say, water bill, life insurance, other stuff — so I get about 1000 points a month. So over the year, I get $120, which is like a night in a hotel. So that balances out the 95 fee for me. But what’s more worth it is they recoup your TSA Pre-Check or Global entry fees. So that’s a pretty significant benefit. So Venture is a good one. But it also come with a 50,000 point bonus for travel. That’s 500 for a ticket, or a couple nights in a hotel or AirBnB. So that’s a good one. And then Adventure 1, is no annual fee, 20,000 point bonus – or 200 bucks. And you get 1.5 points on all purchases. So again it comes down to math and what makes sense for you.
But if you’re going to Hawaii every year, you might get a United card and everything you spend goes into miles and that’ show you pay for your ticket.
Yeah, and Air Alaska and Air Hawaii, have their own branded cards. So do Royal Caribbean and and Disney —
Wouldn’t want one of those now…
No kidding. But funny enough, a lot of travel-related cards are restructuring their rewards now. Especially the ones with high annual fees, because hey know nobody’s traveling.
So, it might make sense now to have an all-around card, since you might not be eating out as much or traveling as much.
Right now, if a person is getting a credit card tomorrow, and they feel like their credit is in a position where they can get a card with a low introductory rate or zero percent for an extended period of time and a decent signup bonus, then straight cash back rewards on groceries because you’re eating at home more. That’s the probably the way to do it.
So we talked gas. Restaurants. Groceries. Travel. Are there other obvious categories or are those the big ones?
Yeah. There’s no, like, daycare ones unfortunately. But Citi has a card called Double Cash, which is good, because you get one percent rewards as you spend it and another percent back as you pay. So that’s 2% cash on everything. And it’s no fee. But there’s no sign up bonus. And usually, you’ve got an introductory bonus rate for 9 months. But it’s a solid card for sure. If you have a cad that’s’ got a $150 sing up bonus, that’s $15,000 you’ll have to spend – at 1% — to get that money back. So, what can you spend on your card to make that money back? Can you pay your rent or your mortgage with your credit card? Can you pay your kids day care? Can you make a car payment? Your cell phone bill? Cable? Internet? And if you can, make sure they don’t charge a processing fee, because some people do. So total up those bill and see how much money you’re going to potentially spend. And ask: is it going to be worth $150 right now?
And at some point, it’s like “How much work is it to keep track of everything?”
Sure. And for example, PayPal and Venmo, if you pay with a credit card, it’s 3%. But if it’s automatic draft, it’s no percentage. So is that worth paying with a card? Probably not.
So it sounds like your saying, “Know your key expenses, know your behaviors, and pick a card or two that instinctively make sense: “Use this card for restaurants, this one for groceries, this one for travel.” Then lean back and know that collectively it will work out.
Yeah. Focus on two or three things. My family, my wife and two kids, I know our most significant expense after a house and my daughter’s school is groceries. So getting the most money back for groceries makes sense. We like to go out to eat, but we don’t do it all the time. But we do it enough that having some cash back for restaurants – with no annual fee – why would I not do that? If we spend $200 to $300 on a restaurant per month, we get $80 to $100 back a year, why not? But gas, restaurants, groceries are usually the ones people focus on.
But even doing the math, it’s s $80 or $100 – maybe $200. And only if you pay the thing off. You’re not gonna come out richer spending money. So the number one thing people need to recognize their own behavior. If you’re not responsible with money, adding a credit card to the mix likely won’t help.
Yeah, it’s not free money. Do I go out and say, “I’m gonna get the $20 olive oil instead of the normal $8 because I’m getting six percent back?” No. you have to apply that same logic to every purchase. You don’t go put that new iPhone on your credit card for $8 in rewards. It makes no sense. You want to make money back on the expenses that are already happening. And right now, people aren’t ‘driving as much, so not as big of a deal. But Amazon? Chase has and Amazon and an Amazon Priime card. If you have an Amazon Prime card, you get 5% back on all your purchases on Amazon. So that’s probably a decent card to have in your wallet right now.
Have it plugged into your Amazon account and leave it there.
Yeah. And other cards have rotating categories. Like Discover it and the Chase Freedom card. They’ll offer 5% each quarter on groceries or Amazon and Walmart.com, or gas and going out. And they try to do it seasonally. So holidays is online shopping. And in summer its’ gas and restaurants because people travel and eat out. And I have that Discover card. And I got it for the sign up bonus — the first year they doubled the cash back on everything. And I ended up with 1000 cash at the end of the year, because I maxed out all the categories. So for that first year, I was pumping every single dollar that we spent through that card. And I didn’t use any rewards. And at the end of the year I earned $938 bucks because they literally doubled everything. And that’s pretty sweet for a sign up bonus.. But the thing is, I didn’t lose any money because I didn’t pay any interest. I would buy things and then I would pay it off every month.
And they’re betting on you to do the opposite. It’s all a gamble. They want to sucker you in, hook you with a low rate, and at some point, they’re betting shit happens and you’re not as diligent as you thought you’d be, and the payback comes in.
Totally. And credit cards make their money two ways: transaction fees and interest fees. So, if you’re making 20 transactions a month, they’re getting a percentage of those. And on top of that, if you’re carrying a balance, they’ll make money on interest fees. So they want you to make transactions, but they also want that interest. So they want people that are going to screw up and carry a balance from month to month. So basically it’s you versus them: “I’m gonna have self control. I’m not going to screw up. I’m gonna get these rewards and I’m gonna pay nothing.” Because if you pay no annual fee, then all you’re doing is getting
Will it be harder for people to get cards in light of the crisis?
I think I’s going to be easier, personally, because people are hunkering down and banks want to lend you money. Credit card companies want people to use their products. They’re losing money on transaction fees. People are making fewer transactions. They’re doing one big grocery run, paying a Netflix bill and a cell phone bill. They’re not running around all day ibuying coffee and then gas and then a hot dog. So instead of putting 20 to 30 transactions on a card, they’re down to eight or 9. So I think they might try to lure people in. But that’s just my own thoughts. I haven’t done any research.
Their job isn’t to make sound financial choices for you. Their job is to turn a profit. And if it means getting you on a hook, they will.
Yeah, they don’t care about the consumers, other than dollar signs. It’s sad, but it’s true. That’s why I say it’s us versus them. Credit card companies don’t care about you. So you shouldn’t concern yourself with what they think about you. You have to do what’s best for yourself.
So don’t feel guilty about jumping from 0% interest credit card to 0% interest credit card.
Totally.
But I assume that can catch up to you, too.
Well, it depends. When I first started getting into this, I wanted to get all these zero percent interest cards. Fortunately, I had enough self-control to pace it out. And it has a benefit, but it has negative impacts as well. Because one of the score factors is the amount of new credit you have and total accounts. So, if you have five years of credit history, and five accounts – say 2 student loan accounts and two credit cards. All of a sudden you open a new credit card, now you have six account over five years. Now your average age of accounts isn’t one year. It’s like eight months. So if you open a bunch of credit cards immediately, and your average age of accounts goes down, a percentage of your credit score is going to drop. But opening a bunch of credit cards very quickly, you’re adding inquires to your account – which will drop your score. And some of the more conservative banks, if you have five new accounts or three credit cards within a 24 month period, it’s an automatic denial for any of their products.
That’s crazy.
And one thing you don’t want to do is waste an inquiry of you’re not sure you’ll be approved. So everybody is entitled to a free credit repot every year. You can go to each of the bureaus, and you can get a free report. It’s not going to be a score, but it’s a report, that they see with al your credit history. You have to pay for the score, which might be worth it—it’s like 10 or 20 bucks for one time. And all those lenders use the FICO model. But all the free sites like Credit Karma, they use a different method, and it’s a toy in comparison. It’s not real. They’re so non-representative of the actual score that a bank would see. And those sites are all advertising platforms. They want you to apply for cards through their site, because they make a nickel or a click and 50 cents per application – or whatever. It’s in their best interest to sell you a credit card product through their website. It’s not in their best interest to give you realistic odds. So it’s a worthwhile expense to get your score though one of the bureau’s directly.
And a lot of credit card companies have pre-qualification tools where you put in name, address, income, etc. and they’ll list if they have any pre-qualified offers for you. And that doesn’t count as an application. And it’s an easy way to check without dinging your credit score. It’s a soft pull, so they’re not doing a hard inquiry on your credit so it won’t count against your credit at all.
It’s safe to say, this is all about making debt an asset, right? Because everyone’s gonna have debt. So there are ways to make debt work for you. You just have to be careful.
Exactly. And having the amount of available credit that you have, does factor into your debt to income ratio. Because if you have $70,000 in student loans and car payments – and you make $70 grand a year. You have an even debt to income ratio. But if you have a higher amount of credit, totalling a $100,000, using a small amount of that credit, say carrying a $1000 balance from month to month – – that’s 1%, which is an incredibly small amount of credit usage.
And that’s a good thing then.
Very good. So there’s percentage tiers within the credit scoring model. Zero to 10% is considered the best. So if you have $100,000 in available credit and your monthly balance is between 1 and 10%. But it goes by 10s. So 11 to 20, 21 to 30, and above 30 is considered more risky.
So if you’re running around with your credit cards maxed out and a bunch of student loans, you can’ be relied upon to handle any more. So ‘pay your shit off’ is what it comes down to.
Right. Don’t’ overspend outside your means. And that’s’ why making a budget is important. And it can be daunting. But just knowing your fixed expenses every month, can be very eye-opening and help you manage your expenses – more so on the variable end. But it will help you not incur unnecessary debt. So, I spread zero percentage interest rates over certain credit cards, so if any major expenses come up in a given period, we know we wouldn’t have to pay interest on them. And we talk about missing payments having an effect. But basically, if you can prove that you’ve been making payments on time for a about a year, having those missed payments in the past will be less significant of a factor. More conservative lenders might be looking for two, three of four years. But some of them, this day in age, can be more flexible.
So, if you are getting behind in these scary times, it won’t cripple you forever.
Totally. But when using credit tools as a component of personal finance strategy, if people do have collections accounts, and they’re worried, right now it’s not the time to worry about paying off those collection debts. Because just because you pay it off, that negative mark’s not going to go way from your credit report. It’ll show it’s resolved, but it will still be there. So there’s no benefit right now, when times are tight, to pay off those accounts. Put your money toward real expenses. There’s very little [immediate] benefit to paying off an account that’s been moved to collections Those agencies buy those debts from hospitals or other lenders for pennies on the dollars. There are different strategies you can use, though. You can offer a compromise – “you say $100, I’ll give you $50, and you take it off my credit report.” And they might do it, because odds are they spent even less. In that case, it’s beneficial. But if not, let it ride.
And I guess If you have a zero percent APR, its’ pay it off before it kicks in. Because 18% adds up quick.
And there’s credit cards that are for balance transfers. If you’re looking to unload some high-end interest debt to a different card, there will be a fee, but some offer really long introductory deals. But they want you to transfer the balance. So, instead of having a really strong reward structure, the benefit is having a really long introductory balance transfer rate.
And they just hope you screw up.
The want you to screw up. They have interest in you successful managing your credit.
That’s your responsibility.
Yes. And that’s the thing with credit cards. If someone’s just getting into it, yes, you’re getting rewards, but more importantly, you’re setting yourself up for – down the road — being able to get the best financing on a car, or the best mortgage rate. And that’s where thing spay off. The short-term benefit is a signup bonus and 3% on gas or whatever, but the real long term benefit is getting tier-one lending. That can save you thousands when you got to get a car or house. So the long-term benefit is the impact on your credit score, which overall improves your attractiveness to lenders.
___________________________________________________________
In Wilmington, residents still buy bottled water to avoid drinking GenX. In Charlotte, running a hot bath might mean soaking in coal ash. Boiling pasta in Pittsboro? Prepare to sample some polyfluoroalkyl substances (aka PFAS). But on the Outer Banks?
“I’ve always said, the only way you’re going to die from drinking the water here is if you drown in it,” says Ken Flatt, who retired last year after serving 30 years as Dare County’s Utilities Director. “We’re so regulated. We’re right behind the nuclear power industry, I would say.”
It’s more than just how our water’s treated. It’s where it begins: pumped from a deep, confined aquifer as opposed to pulled from rivers and lakes, which can carry more pollutants. Add a comparatively young and ever-evolving system of high-tech facilities — and a dedicated team of longtime workers — and you get a product with both plenty of safety checks and precious few secrets.
“People think of us as a black box, but we’re really open,” says our current Utilities Director, Patrick Irwin, who took the job after working 29 years for both Currituck and Dare County. “We do school tours. We bring in college students. We’re always happy to convey information on all of our areas, because it’s important for us that people know what we do.”
We sat down inside their state-of-the-art Skyco plant to find out: what makes our tap water so top-notch?
The print version of this interview appeared in Milepost 9.1, Spring 2020.
MILEPOST: First things first: where does our water originate?
PATRICK IRWIN: We pump from the Yorktown aquifer, which has a confining layer [of clay] on top, and a confining layer on bottom, so it’s real consistent. It’s still brackish — it’s saltwater and freshwater — but as we bring the water up and push it through our membranes, we don’t have to make that many adjustments. If you’re a surface water treatment plant, every time it rains you’ve got to change how you feed your chemicals. So using the aquifer was a great decision made early on.
KEN FLATT: And that aquifer is 10,000 to a million years old, depending the layer. However, it has to be treated with chlorine because there are organics in it.
And by “organics” you mean dead trees, dead animals…
KEN FLATT: Anything carbon-based. Of course, when you combine organics with our disinfection — which is chlorine — they can form trihalomethanes, but those are regulated, too.
PATRICK IRWIN: And that chlorine keeps our water safe from bacteria. But there are contaminants in all water. The question is: at what level is it safe to drink? That’s the EPA’s job. Our job’s about following regulations. And as regulations keep getting tighter, we have to keep working on our treatment to stay ahead of it. For example, the trihalomethane regulations were 100 parts per billion, and the state lowered them to 80 ppb. In Dare, we were right around the high 70s, but we knew the EPA would eventually drop it, so we went to 20 ppb with the nanofiltration units in service.
KEN FLATT: And to further explain a part per billion, it’s one drop of water in 10,000 gallons. So that’s how diluted it is.
So with bacteria, I‘m sure we’re avoiding E. coli and things like that. But what do trihalomethanes do?
KEN FLATT: The concern, over the long term, is cancer. If you’re above the limit, the risk level is you have to drink a liter a day for 60 years to have a 1-in-100,000 chance of getting cancer. That’s pretty remote. For GenX, they’re now looking at parts per trillion. And that’s one drop in 10 million gallons of water — which is 35 Olympic-sized swimming pools.
I think people are shocked that a company can just discharge any amount of chemicals into the water.
PATRICK IRWIN: Well, GenX isn’t regulated. There are no regulations. Now, if that were here, reverse osmosis would remove the GenX. But the treatment plant at Cape Fear doesn’t have reverse osmosis. And, again, they use surface water, which is also much more difficult to treat.
KEN FLATT: And the other thing with surface water is it contains pharmaceuticals. So they find estrogen, betablockers. I was at a conference where a guy from the EPA said they tested water in Arizona, near this place that is famous for retirees, and they found traces of Viagra. [Laughs]
Do we have any surface water plants?
KEN FLATT: No. Fresh Pond was decommissioned in 2008.
And we don’t have any Teflon plants either.
PATRICK IRWIN: And that’s another really good thing. We’re out here; there’s no industry at all.
What if you have a well?
PATRICK IRWIN: It’s surface water, so they’re susceptible to anything that might infiltrate through the soil. But your house probably has a treatment system that runs it through some type of softener, removes the iron, and then it probably hits it with some chlorine solution to disinfect it. We don’t hear of people getting sick from shallow wells.
How high-tech is our system compared to the rest of the state?
KEN FLATT: We’re definitely in the top ten percent.
PATRICK IRWIN: I’d say we’re probably tops. Because there are other reverse osmosis plants out there, but most of it’s surface water. And all our crew has to get a top license to operate. Same with our wastewater guys in Stumpy Point. Plus they’re a dedicated group. They work night shifts in summer. They’re here 24 hours a day.
So is reverse osmosis like a filter? Water goes in one side and comes out the other, and there’s a system that removes whatever might cause you harm?
KEN FLATT: It’s more like an envelope that’s rolled up, like a spiral, and the fresh water passes through the membrane and the salts and the impurities are rejected. You’d think we’d be removing the salt from the water, but we’re removing the fresh water from the saltwater — hence the name ‘reverse osmosis.’ You’ll also hear the term “desalination.” People sometimes assume we’re treating ocean water, but it’s just reverse osmosis.
How is reverse osmosis different from nanofiltration?
PATRICK IRWIN: They’re basically the same process. With reverse osmosis, the membranes are tighter. It removes more contaminants — like aqueous salts. We use that at the North RO (Reverse Osmosis) water plant in Kill Devil Hills, Stumpy Point Water Plant, Rodanthe-Waves-Salvo Water Plant, and the Cape Hatteras Water Plant. But we use nanofiltration in Skyco because that’s fresher water; it’s more efficient.
Where’s it go from there?
KEN FLATT: Dare treats all the water and we sell it to the towns and they distribute it through their distribution systems. We pump water to a ground storage tank and they pump it to their elevated storage.
Does the ocean ever impact our aquifer at all?
KEN FLATT: That was a concern when we first started up the RO plant in Kill Devil Hills. So we monitored and monitored. But the confining layer won’t allow it. And we’re not pumping enough out of it to make a difference. Charleston has issues with saltwater intrusion from underneath, but Charleston pumps so hard because they have so many people.
You mean they suck out so much water that the well wants to pull more water from someplace else?
KEN FLATT: Yes. It creates a cone of depression.
PATRICK IRWIN: Our real saving grace is our offseason. It allows our wells to recover. But, at the same time, you have to be careful with your storage, because you want to keep it fresh. You don’t want to overbuild your system. Because you want that water to turn over.
KEN FLATT: Corolla has big issues with storage, because they will use 200,000 gallons per day in February — and go up to 3 million gallons per day in July.
I saw a Facebook post saying the new KDH water tower looked small. But it sounds like you’re saying it should be small.
KEN FLATT: Sure. Just like you wouldn’t want to drink a glass of water you left on the counter for two weeks. That’s why we flush the hydrants every spring and fall. It freshens the water in the system, and it gets rid of the stagnant water.
PATRICK IRWIN: We have some areas we do weekly because they’re troubled areas. We’re such a north-to-south beach, you’re gonna have a lot of dead ends east to west, so you have to open those lines to pull water through them and keep it fresh.
Is there a tipping point? I can’t imagine reaching that population year round, but could demand get too much — like everyone putting in a swimming pool or something?
KEN FLATT: Well, swimming pools are a big water user, but our water demand has not increased since 2004, when they changed all the appliance rules. Because a washing machine only uses 40 percent of the water it used to. Toilets flush less. So our water demand has remained flat.
Are there any differences between the plants? Different things you need to adjust for?
KEN FLATT: The county has a website where you can go to look for water quality analysis. It showcases all the plants. And all the water parameters are pretty consistent — the pH, the chlorine levels. The only extra treatment the towns might do is boost the chlorine a little. And people say, “Oh! There’s chlorine in the water!” Well, it keeps you from getting diseases! And the other benefit of chlorine is when you bring your vegetables home from the store, you rinse them and it kills the bacteria.
PATRICK IRWIN: And after a storm, if we had a lot of breaks [in lines] we might increase the chlorine. After Dorian, we didn’t, because we only had four breaks on Hatteras Island. But four leaks is really nothing. During Isabel, the pipes were dumping into the ocean in Kitty Hawk, just completely cracked. Of course, we step up the chlorine at that point. But we can’t allow consumers to drink the water until we pass bacteriological tests.
KEN FLATT: And we notify the customers. We’ll do door hangers. And if we need to, we go on the radio.
So what are the other big misconceptions about water quality or how it works?
KEN FLATT: I think the biggest rumor was always the arsenic level. And one of the stories I heard was the pilings were loaded with arsenic and that got into the water. And that’s so completely untrue. It’s a naturally occurring element. The issue really came about when the EPA reduced the limit from 60 parts per billion to 10 part per billion, and we were at 16. So, we put in an arsenic removal system that’s been running since 2004. And we’ve hit maybe five ppb since.
It’s still safer than taking a sip from a stream somewhere.
KEN FLATT: Oh yeah. Oh yeah.
PATRICK IRWIN: Just because of the bacteria alone.
What are the biggest issues or challenges here?
PATRICK IRWIN: I know people always have questions about lead and copper — especially thinking about Flint, Michigan. But we don’t have any lead and copper pipes in our distribution system. It is in some of the houses. I’ve got copper pipes with lead solder. But the county adds a corrosion inhibitor that coats the pipes and we go and test the worst of the worst sites. And it works — my house always non-detects.
What would a “worst of the worst” site be?
PATRICK IRWIN: That would be houses built between ’83 and ’86, with copper pipe and lead solder. You can go to Ace and get a test kit, if you’re concerned. But we’re not Pittsburgh or Detroit or Flint. They had actual lead service lines.
What about improvements for the future? Any cool advances?
PATRICK IRWIN: We have a capital improvement plan for the next six years. We’re gonna change out some units in the North Reverse Osmosis plant. We’re putting in new wells down in Cape Hatteras. We’re changing out membranes. Automated meter reading is over five years completed.
<b>KEN FLATT: All the guys can log into the plant with their phones, and start wells remotely. There’s leak detecting software now that will set off an alarm if the meter runs constantly. And you can go back and look at the customer’s use. We can tell when you turn your sprinklers on. When you get up at night to take a leak. Big brother knows. [Laughs]
What about threats to water quality moving forward?
PATRICK IRWIN: I think sea level rise will be an issue with our pipes along the beach road. In Kitty Hawk, we already had to move some pipes because of storms. We lost 2000 feet in Isabel, between Frisco and Cape Hatteras. So, storms, sea level rise — the same things everybody else on the coast deals with.
KEN FLATT: But if there’s a problem, believe me, we’ll be the first to tell you. The big thing is we operate the water system in the public trust. So our decisions aren’t solely based on finances; they’re based on reliability and providing a safe product to our customers. Sometimes that’s overlooked. That’s what went wrong in Flint. They let people make decisions that weren’t in the public trust. And they provided a bad product and didn’t tell people. But our system is relatively new. It was started in 1979. I think the first studies were done in 1972, when they started looking at public water supplies for Dare County. And all those studies are online in detail for everyone to read. They’re great if you have trouble sleeping. [Laughs]
______________________________________________________________________________
Drunken teens? Fiending junkies? Stupid tourists? This fall, the whole beach was frothing with opinions — and outrage — over who snatched Orville Wright’s copper likeness from the national monument. What many don’t realize, however, is it’s the third time that Orville’s been kidnapped. (He first went rogue back in 1985; in 1987, both brothers enjoyed an unplanned holiday.) At press time, the bust had been recovered on a KDH beach, but whodunnit remained a mystery. We tracked down one of the original pranksters from ’85 for an anonymous interview to see what happens when a stupid prank becomes a federal offense — and what punishments today’s fun-loving criminals can expect.
This interview was conducted in October of 2019 and appeared in Milepost 8.4 (Winter 2019/2020).
MILEPOST: What happened back in 1985?
Just a lot of bad decisions. And a lot of beer. [Laughs]
Were you still in high school?
No. It was my first year of college. We must’ve been home for summer because the FBI came looking for us on the beach wearing business suits.
Were you planning to do something the night of the heist?
No! It was totally random. Just another crime of opportunity. We’d been riding around in a buddy’s van having a few beers, and we ended up at the monument. At some point it was just two of us left at the top, drunk and high. We were like, “Hey, these things move!” So we shoved one over. Then we shoved the other one over. Then we wrenched off Orville’s head, carried him down, and threw him in the bushes. We didn’t even tell the others. We just jumped back in the van and went highway surfing — riding around on top, Teen Wolf style. [Laughs] Just another basic night of teenage debauchery.
Did you even remember the next day? And did you realize you’d made a mistake?
Actually, a friend saw the paper first. He called and woke me up: “Do you have Orville?!” And I was, “Yeah! We got Orville!” At that point it was still funny. Then I saw it was frontpage news, and it was like, “Uh-oh. That was probably a bad idea.” [Laughs] And then it was on the national news. And that’s when we were like, “Oh. We’re f#%ed.”
What’d you do?
After a couple days, we called the Coastland Times from a payphone — full Deep Throat style — and said, “Orville’s in the bushes.” We were hoping they’d stop looking for us if they got the bust back. But, by then, everybody was super pissed. I don’t think it took the cops a week to find us. They rounded us all up, one by one, took us to the park service offices at Fort Raleigh, and put us in separate rooms. At that point, I just told them the truth.
How’d they’d figure it out?
I think one of the girls told them. But there was also a $5000 reward, so who knows? I mean, there were five people with us that night — and that’s four too many. [Laughs]
How scared were you?
I was terrified! I had to tell my mom I stole Orville’s head! And all week people around us were talking about how they wanted to kill us. Even my mom’s boyfriend was like, “They should kill those bastards!” And it was a federal offense. They were talking about 15 years in jail, a $750,000 fine. But they ended up charging us with destruction of government property. We had to pay $7500 in restitution — each — and got two years federal probation.
Who do you think it was this time? People on Facebook are blaming tourists and junkies.
It’s kids — of course it’s kids! It happened homecoming night. If it were junkies, they’d have stolen both of them.
Do you think they had the same idea — that by ditching Orville in the dunes, the cops would stop looking?
I’m sure that’s what they’re thinking. But I heard they might have prints. If that’s true, they’re done.
Think they’ll have solved the case by the time this mag comes out in November?
Depends on how many people were there, but they’ll be dealing with it for at least another six months. It took us forever to go to court. And I’m still hated around here. In fact, about 15 years after, I helped a teacher friend with a class project, and the school was like, “Don’t ever bring him back!” [Laughs] Those poor bastards. They don’t know what they’re in for.
What would you do?
It’d probably be better just to turn themselves in. I bet they would have gone easier on us if we had. But we also were paying for the damage. Apparently, you can screw off the heads — that’s what the guys did in 1987.
Do you know anything about who pulled that one in ’87?
No. I was back at school. But the FBI came knocking on my door: “The heads were stolen again.” I was like, “Wasn’t me! I haven’t been there since that night!” I still haven’t. Acutally, I’m kind of surprised they didn’t come talk to me this time. [Laughs]
Well, that was the last time anyone got the originals: the NPS says the current ones are replicas.
So they never got ’em back?!
No. They got ’em back. They just stashed them someplace secure.
That’s good. Because I paid a lot of money to make them look like new. [Laughs] — Richard Hauptmann
_________________________________________________________________
THERE’S TWO SIDES TO EVERY GROIN
Getting a second coastal scientist’s opinion on Dare County’s plan to replace the Cape Hatteras jetties.
We’re not saying they asked the wrong questions. We’re just saying they asked the wrong people.
At the June 3 Dare County commissioners meeting, Coastal Science and Engineering presented a bold plan to handle Buxton’s erosion woes. With the equivalent of two years of sand being lost within a year of completing the recent project in March 2018 — nearly 304,000 cubic yards disappearing due to Hurricane Florence — the company suggested trying to restore the Cape Hatteras groins to better protect homes, businesses and NC 12.
“We can’t control the weather,” said senior coastal engineer, Dr. Haiqing Liu Kaczkowski. “But this is the one thing we can do.”
It’s still tricky. While state law banned building hardened structures on the coast back in 1985, the Navy finished Buxton’s groins in 1970. Restoring them might be “grandfathered” under NC’s Coastal Areas Management Act, provided they agree the structures remain 50 percent functional. But even if the county can find a way to do the work, should they?
By definition, groins trap sand in one place — and steal it from others. (Upon completion, Buxton’s current trio of steel structures immediately began eroding the beach south of Cape Hatteras Lighthouse.) However, CS&E’s team asserts that groin designs have vastly improved. With continued nourishment, they say, more refined profiles collect enough sand to protect the threatened area while letting the surplus flow south. They even presented a “successful project example” — a terminal groin installed in 2013 at the far southwest end of Folly Beach, SC.
The commissioners responded with solid follow-ups. “How will the new design meld with a restoration project?” “Can they reduce the rate of loss on the southern end?” They also recognized that energy levels differ between coastlines.
And the engineers’ answers were certainly forthright. They noted any groins will still require immediate, and ongoing, nourishment. They also said if monitoring showed erosion exceeding the historical rate, “you might have to pull the groin out.”
But the fact is, every coastal protection presentation is part science — and part sales pitch. So why is the county asking the contracting company these questions when we’re home to Wanchese’s Coastal Studies Institute and Duck’s Army Corps of Engineers’ Field Research Facility? Both are full of coastal science experts — neither of them stand to see a penny from doing the work. (Much less a multi-million-dollar contract.)
We reached out to PhDs in both places for professional opinions. The Army Corps declined. (They feared the public might confuse one scientist’s opinion for an official government stance.) But Dr. Reide Corbett, who is the Dean of Integrated Coastal Programs and Executive Director of the Coastal Studies Institute, agreed to watch the online video of the presentation and provide his take.
“I’m not a coastal engineer,” he cautioned. “But I’ve focused a lot on coastal processes in my 20-plus-year career. And by January, CSI will have two on staff — I’m sure either would be happy to provide input.”
Until then, here’s Dr. Corbett’s two cents. Think of it as free advice from a coastal health specialist.
Ed note: The following interview took place in July 2019. It also appears in Issue 8.3 of Outer Banks Milepost.
MILEPOST: So, what was your take on the presentation? Did it feel balanced? Accurate?
DR. REIDE CORBETT: Well, the county’s being proactive to help protect property, people and the road — so that’s good. But Buxton is always going to be a challenge. One thing to point out is that the Outer Banks has key “hot spots” with increased erosional rates. S-Turns is one. South Nags Head is one. Buxton is one. There’s all sorts of reasons why we have these hot spots — some of it’s underlying geology, some of it’s geomorphology of the offshore bathymetry, which focuses wave energy — but the fact is we have them. And just nourishing those hotspots doesn’t solve the problem. It adds sand — it buys time — it doesn’t solve the problem.
Which is why they want to rebuild the groins — to trap sand in place longer. Except these engineers say new designs trap just enough sand to create just enough beach — but let the rest flow south so those beaches there won’t erode. Is that right?
Every groin traps sand. That is what they’re constructed to do. And if you trap sand in one place, you starve it from someplace else. What they’re saying is, “We’re gonna rebuild these groins using slightly different engineering. Then, we’re going to add enough sand right away, so there will be sand moving past the groin and not starving anything down drift.” Yeah, I think there’s logic there, but I do think there needs to be more information. Does the county understand the amount of sand that’s going to need to be pumped — and therefore, the amount of money that’s going to be needed — to fill that pocket they’ve created by constructing the groin? That wasn’t really discussed.
They use Folly Beach as an example of what works. Are they comparing apples with apples?
No! Heavens no! Yeah, we’re both beaches along the Atlantic Seaboard. I agree with that. But there’s a reason Cape Hatteras is a surf mecca: the amount of energy we have is different, the number of storms and nor’easters we have is different. Then, let’s look at offshore bathymetry, offshore slopes. Also, Folly Beach already has a groin field that starts way up in town — they simply added another. Have the groins solved their problems? No. The city still nourishes. And they nourish fairly often — in fact, Folly Beach just finished a project in January 2019.
At one point, the commissioners asked if the engineers could guarantee the same accretion. What’s your take?
Again, that’s totally dependent on the dynamics of the system. The groin they show is next to an inlet — inlets are pretty dynamic. And that photo they use from August 2018, five after years of completion, looks great. But August is a time where you get accretion anyway, because there’s less energy in the system. That’s not when you want to plan for; you want to plan for winter when you have waves. I’d want to know: what did it look like at January of that year? I don’t want to suggest they are cherry picking, but just grabbing a snapshot does not tell you the dynamics of the system.
Is it safe to say the answer all comes down to saving money? Will the county spend less total money putting in groins and dumping less sand?
Yeah. Dealing with sand is just a simple budget — what comes in, and what goes out. And adding a groin changes the budget. But you’re not creating sand by putting in these groins; you’re still going to have erosion, and you’re still going to need to nourish the beach. And that was mentioned, but I’m not sure everybody heard that.
There was another statement that seemed to go unnoticed: if erosion rates down coast start exceeding the historical rate, we might have to pull the groin out. That was never addressed again.
And then you have to ask, who has to pull it out? Is it the firm? Is it the Park Service? Is it the county? I guess you can argue all those questions don’t need to come up unless you get permission to rebuild. But we’re putting a lot of money into these short-term solutions without having these hard discussions about what the long-term plan is. I think it would be good for Dare County to take a leadership role, working with the different townships to start thinking a bit more holistically. There also needs to be some additional thoughtful conversation beyond the protective approach — nourishment or groins —toward thinking about how to accommodate these changes, as well. A perfect example is that jug-handle at S-Turns. That doesn’t make everybody happy, but the fact is nourishment there is not economical, it’s not going to hold the road, it’s not going to work in the long-term. So, they’re thinking out beyond the two-, five-, or seven-year plan. And that needs to happen not just across Dare county, but across every US coastline, and across the world.
Well, I’m sure there has to be pressure to move fast when there’s a time limit to get FEMA money — and you’re trying to respond before another storm hits.
That’s right. There are properties there that are at the brink of being in the surf zone. They just finished a nourishment a little over a year ago and they already need more sand. That’s scary for that community. I’m not saying we shouldn’t think about that in the short-term. I’m saying we shouldn’t be doing that in a vacuum.
So what questions should they be asking? Not just of the engineering firm, but other scientists?
Well, for the Buxton area, they need to ask, “If we rebuilt the groins, what’s that cost? How much nourishment are we talking about so we don’t lead to increased erosions down drift? What’s that cost? And how often are we going to have to nourish this after we put in these groins?” And you can do those calculations based on one groin, two groins, or three groins. But all that leads to the question of, is this a solution? And the answer to that is no. You still have an erosion rate. This is still an erosional hotspot. You’re still going to have to nourish. And to think ten or 20 years out is a hard discussion — but it has to happen. And the conversation needs to involve the community, it needs to involve scientists, it needs to involve engineers. Because, right now, we’re in a very reactive situation. If we can’t put plans in place today, we will always be reactive. And people are going to be really ticked off if we’re always reactive. And that isn’t going to help anyone. — Matt Walker
_________________________________________________________________
THE WEATHER MAN
NOAA’s Dr. Neil Jacobs just wanted to score more waves — he ended up scoring America’s top meteorology job.
What’s the difference between an armchair quarterback and an armchair weatherman? The QB’s never gonna reach the big leagues. The weatherman just might run the whole show.
“My official title is kinda long,” laughs the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Dr. Neil Jacobs. “It’s Secretary of Commerce for Environmental Observation and Prediction, performing the duties of Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere. What that means is, I’m the acting NOAA administrator.”
Not bad for a guy who spent his days at the University of South Carolina monitoring the Weather Channel so he could score waves between double-majoring in math and physics. In fact, Jacobs was halfway through grad school — and on his way to working with semi-conductors — when he had a change of heart.
“The whole time I was in school I was trying to figure out when the coastal lows would set up so I could go surf,” he explains. “And predicting waves is just applied math. I decided I might as well decide how to do this for a living, because I was doing it anyway.”
He transferred into North Carolina State University’s meteorology program and got his masters in Air-Speed Interaction and a PhD in numerical weather prediction — all while doing a fair bit of firsthand verification on Outer Banks beaches.
“Between my aunt’s house in Virginia Beach and another friend in Kill Devil Hills, I’d be back and forth to the Outer Banks all the time.”
After graduating, he went to work for a start-up called AirDat, which was equipping commercial airlines with state-of-the-art weather sensors. The idea took off — so did his career. In 2013, a corporate buyout made him the Chief Atmospheric Scientist at Panasonic Avionics Corporation. (He also served as Chair of the American Meteorological Society’s Forecast Improvement Group.) In 2018, the Trump Administration tapped him to join NOAA; this past February, they put him in charge.
Today, Jacobs’ job description includes managing a $5.5 billion budget while working to improve NOAA’s predictions. That means everything from upgrading computer models and pushing technology to turning everyday gadgets into active weather gauges — all to keep American citizens safer, happier and better informed. The irony? He’s usually too busy to benefit personally.
“The last time I surfed the Outer Banks was about three weeks ago,” he admits. “It’s tough to get out of DC. I’ll know it’s good, but I’m totally slammed. So, I go stare at the webcams and think, ‘What am I missing?’”
Now that’s what we call sacrificing for your country. As we head into another hurricane season, we asked Dr. Jacobs to give us the update on what NOAA’s doing to protect our coast — and what residents can do to protect themselves. — Matt Walker
This interview took place in April 2019. An edited version appears in Issue 8.2.
MILEPOST: What’s your your exact title?
DR. NEIL JACOBS: It’s really long. It’s NOAA Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Environmental Observation and Prediction, performing the duties of Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere.
So what does that mean for the average shmoe?
I’m the acting NOAA administrator.
Does that mean you’re currently the top guy in charge?
Yes.
How’d you end up there? I understand you grew up on the Florida coast?
My dad was in the Air Force. So we traveled around. At one point he was stationed at Homestead so I was back and forth between South Miami Heights and Vero Beach. I spent most of my time surfing a little farther north in the Sebastian Inlet/Wabasso area, because South Beach was never good normally. And then my parents, in the mid-80s, moved up to Charleston, South Carolina and I started surfing Folly Beach. And I ended up going to the University of South Carolina for undergrad, only because I felt like College of Charleston was too close to my house and my parents would be over at my apartment every day. So I did undergraduate at USC in physics and Math. I started a graduate program there in advanced math and physics doing work with the semi-conductor industry. But the whole time I was doing that I was basically watching the Weather Channel trying to figure out when the coastal lows would set up and the winds would switch offshore so I could go surf. And this was really before there was a lot of information on the Internet. But I was about halfway through a graduate program and just got sick of it. I decided, “You know what? Predicting waves is just applied math. I might as well decide how to do this for a living because I was doing it anyway.”
So, I started working on wave models and atmospheric models and ended up looking at a couple of different grad schools. And it came down to Scripps in Southern California, MIT/Woods Hole in Boston, and North Carolina State University. Scripps was just too far from the rest of my family. And I went up and interviewed at Woods Hole and it was August, and there was actually some hurricane swell, and we ended up surfing down in Rhode Island. And it was really good but I was wearing a spring suit in August. And they were telling me that in the winter you have to wear 7-mil booties and a dry suit — and I didn’t even own a hood at that time because Folly was as far north as I surfed. And so I ended up going to NC State. And my aunt had lived in Virginia Beach for most of her life. And between her house in VB and another friend in Kill Devil Hills, I’d be back-and-forth to the Outer Banks all the time. Even as a kid, I’d spend summers in Virginia Beach and we would just drive down. That was basically it. I graduated with a Masters in air-speed interaction and a PhD. in numerical weather prediction from NC State and taught at NC State for a while, just undergraduate thermodynamics and atmospheric thermodynamics. And worked with a start-up company called AirDat that was equipping commercial airlines with weather sensors and running models, and writing model code. And at one point, that company, was acquired by Panasonic so I started doing model development, and software engineering and forecasting for Panasonic. But then the White House calls me up one day out of the blue and asks me if I want to take this position NOAA, and I certainly wasn’t going to live that down.
It’s interesting that you never dove into the government route before. Was that a conscious decision?
It was just luck. I was actually headed to a post doc at the EPA out of grad school. And that program got relocated to the West Coast from the Research Triangle in Raleigh and I didn’t want to go out there; I wanted to stay in North Carolina. And at that point I was teaching adjunct at NC State and teaching adjunct at Meredith College. And this start-up company called AirDat – which was basically two guys who invented this sensor in a garage and tested it in the back of their motorcycle. And they came to hire my advisor. And my advisor just got tenure, so he wasn’t going to leave. So he said, “Why don’t you hire my grad student? He’s going to be looking for a job in a couple months.” And I thought, fine. Between the two adjunct position and a side job working at bike shop, I wasn’t going to say no to job opportunity. I thought it was like every other start-up company, that it would most likely fizzle out or fail. But this one had a really good idea and literally took off.
And that kept you in North Carolina. So were you doing your own personal forecasting just to stay wet?
I was actually using the models that we wrote at AirDat and then later the models we were running at Panasonic to do forecasting for my own personal surfing. The cool thing about Panasonic is we had offices all over the planet so I was traveling about 250,000 miles a year in a plane. I’ve got boards stashed all over the place; France, Singapore, Indonesia. And I would just fly to the different Panasonic offices and leave boards there and then figure out how to schedule meetings on Fridays and Mondays so I could stay over the weekend.
So you had your own little personal forecasting system – just for yourself. So you’ve witnessed the progress of technology from the pre-internet days, to where armchair forecasters and websites everywhere. Obviously, things are more accurate, but what else have you noticed as far as the evolution of weather forecasting from your college time ‘til now?
There’s a couple of major advancements. The first one is that the code is obviously more accurate. The computational power allows us to run models at much higher resolution, much faster. The other thing is we have a lot more accurate observations going into the model to initialize them. And the code is becoming more and more efficient and the computers are becoming so powerful that — so, when I was in grad school, we were running MM5 [ 5th generation mesoscale model] and WRF [weather research and forecasting model ] on a super computer. I can run that on my MacBook now. So, what’s happened is because a lot of this software people can run on their personal computers, we’ve started putting code out on GitHub and people – essentially arm chair forecasters or people who are software engineers or just kids who like to tinker with code — can download it and run it. And if they find bugs or make improvements they can actually enhance it. So we’ve gotten to a point now where we’re basically crowdsourcing model development. In fact, yesterday we uploaded the entire package of Wavewatch III code to GITHUB. So now anyone can download it and run it and do their own surf forecasting.
What’s GitHub now?
So, GitHub, is a repository for code. And anyone get an account and upload code and make it freely available for others to download.
So we’ve gone from a time when you needed the weatherman just to where the average person can be the weatherman. Not just in terms of forecasting for themselves but helping inform the general public.
Well, I think we’re seeing a shift — and we’ll probably see that shift in our personnel as well — where it used to be that we had a lot of skilled forecasters who knew how to interpret model output, and that will probably be the case. But now the model output is becoming so accurate, I think we’re going to see a shift from skilled people who know how to interpret the output to software engineers and modelers who actually improve the creation of the output.
So you’re telling me that forecasters will have less of a job and computer nerds will have more of a job?
Well, I think the evolution will probably keep pace with the retirement and new hires. But where I’d really like to see the future of an agency like NOAA go is recruiting more people out of college — and even out of high school — and get them in programs that are software engineering-based. Because we’re heading into a more digital age where we’ll be dealing with more data and processing. And there will always be humans involved. But instead of having a human in the loop, we’ll be having a human over the loop where you have people monitoring automated processes. There will always be a need for people, but the skill set is slowly going to shift.
That includes machines, too, correct? Isn’t NOAA using more drones and gliders and automated technologies that can go places — like storms — where it’s not safe to send people? Or just not possible?
Yeah. We’re looking at all sorts of observing systems. So, drones — from the larger fixed-wing drones to even these small-quadcopters can produce useful data. And we’re looking to use other instruments that wouldn’t necessarily be designed for the purposes of collecting weather data but we can figure out how to extract information we can use from it. So, for example, your smart phone has a pressure sensor on it. so we can pull barometric pressure from people’s smart phones if they’re willing download the app and upload the data. The other thing is when we get into more smart cars, if you blue tooth your phone to your car and you turn on your windshield wipers — or you have road sensors that senses road conditions — that data can be uploaded and assimilated into the model to verify precipitation forecasts. There’s all sorts of ways that we can extract information that we can use in the model from automated processes that were designed without even having weather in mind.
That’s crazy. I remember you were looking at planes and ships delivering data, too, to fill in gaps in places like the ocean where there might not be any info.
Yeah. Getting information over the ocean is one of the trickiest things to do. And there’s so much open ocean there. And satellites are hugely critical but the big hurdle with satellites is, even though the horizontal resolution — or the spatial resolution — is so accurate you can basically read someone’s license plate from outer space, it’s the vertical coordinate that’s tricky. Even the most accurate observations have a plus or minus error of half a kilometer in the vertical coordinate. So it’s really what’s going on in the lower part of the atmosphere over the open the ocean, is really hard to measure. And so we have surface drifting buoys which are helpful, and then observations from ships. And it used to be that a lot of these observations were hard to come by because we couldn’t get the observation off the ship. Now ships — and its’ the same for commercial airlines — are installing sat coms for either purposes of either communication or passenger communication. Because everyone wants to check their email or have access to the internet no matter where they are on the planet. We can use those channels to run weather data off either ships or planes at the same time, as well.
It’s kind of like, if you opt in, you’re a willing partner but you’re a like a latent weather gauge sending data into the weather service. I’m assuming its’ for hindcasting and verification? Or forecasting? Or all of it?
It’s stuff we used for hindcasting and verification, as well as forecasting. In some cases, if it’s smart phone apps – you may have to pay for the app, it may be free, you would certainly have to opt into the program to upload the data. And then in more sophisticated situations where it’s airlines or ships, that would be something along the lines of a commercial data buy where we would purchase a feed from a company that would aggregate that data.
It’s interesting. Because the use of people data is so controversial — whether it’s Facebook or what have you. But this sounds like its’ a pretty positive application, if you’re willing to click that box. So where do we stand in terms of satellites and models. This is the time of year armchair forecasters are watching the tropics models. Everyone talks about the US model versus the European model. Is the European model better, and why? And what’s that mean?
Right now it’s better. The European ECMWF have had a more advanced model for probably eight or 10 years now. It’s almost all related to how they do data assimilation, which is the step in the model where you aggregate all the observations and build your initial conditions for the model. The actual prediction aspect of the model itself is no better than what the US has, but it’s how they do the data assimilation step that’s more sophisticated. And we are in the process of developing a version of our own data assimilation system that is what we call Four-Dimensional Variational Assimilation. And so I think that is going to be the real key to surpass the European Center. Because we all use the same data. We all share the same data. There’s no data they have that we don’t and vice versa. What it really comes down to is their ability to better use the data. And there’s a couple of things we’re doing on our end that I think will make some pretty significant improvements on the data assimilation side. A lot of it is how much satellite data we use. Right now, per volume, we only use about eight percent of the data that we collect and a lot of that actually gets thrown out. So roughly 2 to 3% of the data we collect influences the model initial conditions per every model cycle. If we could double or triple that our accuracy would sky rocket. The big hurdle there is the satellite data files are huge. And so, we have to thin the information before we can even move it to a place where we can assimilate into the model. Because we have to assimilate it into the model, essentially, almost as fast as we collect it. and the files are so big we have to thin them so we can move them quicker. So that thinning process actually strips out valuable information. And so what we’re looking at now is moving the processing of the files to where the data is. In other words, doing the pre-processing of satellite data in the cloud, so we won’t have to thin it before we move it. We just process it where it is and then move it. And the other thing we’re looking at is actually using artificial intelligence or machine learning to thin the file more smartly. In other words, you wouldn’t want to thin the file the same over a high pressure system as you would over a tropical storm. You would want to thin it more over a high pressure system and less over a tropical storm, because that’s where you need to retain more information. So, algorithms like that, with AI and machine learning, are where wer’e looking at as well.
When would that be available?
We should be on pace to upgrade the data assimilation in 18 months. Whether that enables us to surpass ECMWF really depends on what upgrades they have planned.
That’s’ crazy. So how much more prepared are we than say when we were 10 years ago — and how much ore do we have to learn?
Good question. I can’t answer the last one, because I don’t really know what I don’t know. But I would say every time we look at something in the future we think is science fiction, all of a sudden it becomes reality. I mean, at one point, nobody thought we’d even be able to forecast the next day. And now we have statistically significant skill out well past day 7. So, 10 years ago, our ability to forecast at day 4 to 5 is what it is now for day 7. There have been some theoretical papers saying that when you look at roughly 2 weeks, no matter what you do in predicting a chaotic system, that is the limit of predictability. But we’re finding that if we start looking at coupled ocean atmosphere models, we can get skilled well beyond three to four weeks, but we have to have a coupled ocean model to do that. Because once you get beyond forecasting into week 3, it’s really driven by the circulation in the ocean.
And that’s where monitoring ships come into play?
That’s exactly where we would use it. And not only that, we’re looking at a couple of other different observing systems. because to do a four-dimensional ocean model we need sub-surface observations, too. So we have a system called the argo profiling network which are just these sensors that go up and down in the water column. And whenever they hit the surface, they relay data through the iridium sat com, and we hit 2 million argo profiles a month or two ago. So these things are all over the ocean and they’re going up and down in the water column. And then were’ also basically underwater drones, which we call gliders, all over the east coast. we deployed a couple in advance of Florence going around in the Gulf Stream collecting surface data.
I know from talking to NOAA last year, they said that were getting really good at forecasting track — but intensity was a big ‘what if’. And Florence and Michael both seemed to reflect that. How is that process coming along? And what does that mean for public awareness moving forward?
So, intensity forecasting is really the tricky part. We’ve got a really good handle on track forecasting. The problem with intensity forecasting — whether it’s the storm that’s sort spreads out and weakens the core , or it tightens up like Michael did — is really a function of the sea surface temperature and the low-level energy. And the problem is, a lot of the satellite data that we use for sea surface temperature, we can’t see below the clouds. So it’s really hard to understand what’s going on in the mix layer beneath the storm. Because a lot of the satellite imagery can’t penetrate the storm. We can see what the sea surface temperature is doing ahead of the storm, but not beneath it, so in some cases when the storm moves over an area where the water column is really deep, warm water, if it upwells more warm water, it will continue to strengthen. But if it upwells cold water, it will weaken itself. And trying to understand that dynamic is tricky unless you really have good subsurface temperature information, which is where the coupled model come into play. But between having really have good subsurface temperature information, and also understanding the physics of the eyewall, those are probably the two forecasting frontiers that are gonna play into intensity. The issue with Florence and messaging to the public is a more complex social science issue because what we found is that, Florence was coming in as a Category 4 and there were a lot of model runs that were showing it weakening but not as much as it did. And people thought: “Oh, it’s downgraded to a 3, and now it’s downgraded to a 2,”and then they hear this word downgraded and they think, “Oh, we don’t have to evacuate, its’ not that big of a deal, it’s only a 2 it’s no ta 4.” And the problem is, people didn’t realize this thing is gonna sit onshore and just park itself there for four days and you’re gonna get three feet of rain. And really the deaths in hurricanes are all water-related. Very rarely are people killed by the winds. It’s the water, whether it’s storm surge or just flooding. So when you a have a storm, even if it’s a Category One, just sit on the coast and you have sustained onshore flow that’s sort of piling up the water — even if it’s not a major surge — it’s preventing the drainage from the rivers. So with Florence we saw three feet of rain dump with a sustained onshore flow, so the rivers and the estuaries couldn’t drain. And we just had massive flooding. And you don’t see that information conveyed in the traditional Saffir-Simpson Scale.
No. And here, the public is pretty passionate — kind of like you were growing up. And there’s spaghetti models all over Facebook. Is it a TMI situation where people end up armchairing their way into the result they want to see – whether its’ evacuating or not evacuating? Are we victims of the information age in that regard.
Yeah, I guess there’s two groups of armchair forecasters to avoid: the ones who think they understand and probably don’t. And the ones that really want an outcome. For example, all these winter weather snow lovers out there have a personal bias toward whatever model puts down the most snow in their backyard, because that’s what they hope happens. And it’s interesting to read the chat forums and blogs about people who want certain types of weather and have sort of a bias when they’re trying to do an objective forecast. So in a situation like this, I just urge the public: if you’re into weather you can hang out and read the blogs, but check in with the Weather Service because that’s where the experts are. Our people are trained, they have access to all the information — including information that the general public may not have access to — and there’s a lot of thought and process that goes into the forecasts that we produce.
It’s funny here, because we had Florence coming at us and missed us. And then Michael sucker punched because we saw it coming all the way from the Gulf and thought, “What can that do?” Do we just grow numb with our own experiences? Or are thing changing so much you have to prepare for anything? Or is it a mix of both?
I think you definitely have to be prepared. When I was growing up in Florida, I thought we were seasoned hurricane veterans because we had been hit by multiple hurricanes in South Florida. And, there, we had a one-story cinderblock house with no trees in the yard so all we did was board up the windows and ride it out. Then, when we were in Charleston when Hugo hit, we hadn’t really thought it through. We stayed because we thought, “We rode these storms out in Florida all the time.” But what we didn’t realize was the building codes were different , and there were pine trees everywhere. And we had 14 trees go down in the yard, two of them went through the roof. And I remember being in the middle of the eye, with a kiddie pool in my sister’s room, because water as just pouring through the ceiling. And the next day we had to chainsaw out of the driveway and you couldn’t get anywhere because there were so many trees down. And so it’s that kind of stuff that you don’t really think about because it had been so long since Charleston had been hit by a major hurricane. That kind of prepartion is important. And now that the emergency manager community is more in tune with the local people, the local community, and they know the impacts on a local level. Really, the folks you want to listen to in a situation like that are your state and local emergency managers because they’re going to understand the impacts as it pertains to you neighborhood versus a larger scale forecast for the state or even multiple states across.
The reporting we see is more intense storms, more active seasons. What’s the future look like in terms of that and what is NOAA looking at in terms long-term prediction, and protection, for what I assume are climate-change situations?
Yeah, there’s sort of a two-fold part to the problem. Typically, it’s a function of pure statistics, the longer you observe a distribution of a system the more likely are to see extreme events. So I don’t know that there’s been enough information to date to show that there’s a statistically significant change. But, there are several model simulations that use the projected warmer scenarios — say 50 or 100 years from now — and then they run a hurricane simulation of say, Hurricane Florence, but swap out the sea surface temperatures that may be one or two degrees warmer. And you end up getting fairly intense storms. There is some debate about whether you get more storms or less storms, some show more, some show less, but most studies show more intensity with more precipitation. But the caveat is these are forecasts based on forecasts, so you’re really assuming he warming scenario is going to materialize. But the thing that is certain is the financial risk exposure. So even if the storms don’t get more intense or more frequent we still have more people living along the coastline than we used to. And we have more development, more investment, and there’s basically more financial risk exposure along the coastline. And so any time you have storm hit, even if it’s the same intensity it’s always been, you’re going to have a lot more financial damage and potentially more lives at risk because of the sheer population growing along the coastline.
So would you buy a house on the Outer Banks?
[laugh] If I could afford the insurance, yeah.
Do you still get down here at all?
Here and there. I was down to surf about 3 weeks ago. It’s tough to get out of DC. If I’m short on time I’ll run down to VB or Delmarva. Usually, I’m totally slammed, so I go to some place like Surfline and stare at the camera and think, “What am I missing?” But if I can get down to the Outer Banks, I’ll do it. I have to give a shout out to Jesse Fernandez, I’ve been riding some of his boards lately and I’m stoked on them. I’ve been riding a variation of the blunt, set up as a quad.
So what do people do to say prepared this season and years to come?
Just tune into our website. Pay attention to the forecast. And listen to your state and local emergency managers when there’s a storm that’s aimed at the coast. And take what they say seriously. If they say, “leave,” leave. If there’s an evacuation and people decide not to evacuate, not only are they putting their own lives at risk they’re putting other lives at risk — not just the folks trying to rescue them, but all the people who may also be in a situation where they need to be rescued. So not adhering to evacuation orders is selfish. And the other thing is be prepared, were gonna be doing a hurricane awareness tour in advance of the hurricane season where we’ll be releasing a lot of information. FEMA is going to be putting information on how to be prepared. This stuff should go without saying: it’s always better to be prepared and not need it than it is to not be prepared at all. And heed the advice they give: don’t’ drive through water. It’s the common sense stuff that keep you out of trouble.
__________________________________________________________
Last February, four busloads of angry Outer Bankers rallied to Raleigh for a public forum. Their purpose? To join hundreds of other citizens protesting the Trump Administration’s new draft plan to explore for petroleum off North Carolina — along with nearly all of America’s Outer Continental Shelf. One year later, those voices have only grown louder as every governor from Florida to New Hampshire has officially asked to be removed from the process, reflecting a wall of unified, bipartisan opposition that runs from coastal businesses to county boards to the halls of Congress. And yet, this spring, it looks like we’re going have to rally again — right here in KDH.
In February, while residents were still waiting for the Department of Interior to issue its proposed plan, we learned the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) had booked the Ramada Inn conference room on May 14, and was researching rooms in Wilmington as well. So what’s that mean? It means by the time you read this, the Outer Banks could be closer to seeing rigs on the horizon than ever before — and residents will have to be ready to push back harder than ever.
“Obviously, we still have to get the official plan to know exactly what they’re proposing,” says Michael Flynn, Coastal Advocate for the NC Coastal Federation. “But if we rallied in Raleigh, I’m sure we’ll rally here. So I would encourage everyone to go ahead and set aside May 14. And be prepared for more ways to voice opposition.”
But it’s not done yet. We still have 90 days for public comment before the DOI issues its decision — and still more ways to fight after that. We asked Mr. Flynn for some straight answers on how we got here, what might happen, and what we can do down the road.
This interview took place in February of 2019 and appears in Issue 8.1.
MILEPOST: I think most Outer Bankers feel like we just beat this issue a few years ago. How did we end up back in the crosshairs?
MICHAEL FLYNN: Basically, there are five-year plans that are developed by the federal government to issue lease sales for offshore oil and gas exploration. In 2014, the Obama Administration proposed opening the Mid-Atlantic and the South Atlantic. There was a lot of public outcry voicing opposition — for the same reasons as today — and the Environmental Impact Statement identified that the Mid-Atlantic and South Atlantic plan was too environmentally sensitive to include this industry. So they were removed from the 2017-2022 plan in March of 2016. Fast-forward to 2017, the Trump Administration issued Executive Order number 13795, which directed the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management to initiate a process to develop a new Outer Continental Shelf Program for 2019-2024. That Draft Proposed Plan was released in January of 2018. It’s a very aggressive plan that pretty much includes 98 percent of the Outer Continental Shelf.
Why?
I can’t speak for them. But personally, I think the strategy was to open it all up, and then pull back to the places that they really want to look at — like the Mid-Atlantic and South Atlantic. But once they started the process last January, it kicked off a 60-day public comment period. That’s when the Coastal Federation — along with other members of the Don’t Drill NC coalition — held a “Rally to Raleigh” protest on the same day as the open house as a bullhorn to generate attention. But the public comments provide the real weight, because they have to be considered as part of the Environmental Policy Act.
Do we know how many comments were made? And the amount of support versus opposition?
We know there were around 2 million comments — you can read 27,000 of them online — but I don’t know how they tilt. [Ed. Note: a scroll through the first 300 comments posted to www.regulations.gov found three in favor of drilling.]
Theoretically, they spent the past year reviewing those comments. What else are they doing?
They’re tasked with preparing a preliminary environmental impact statement. But they could also narrow their focus based on the input they’ve received.
So, they might exclude California since they know they won’t let them get away with it. Or, since [former DOI Secretary Ryan] Zinke said, “Florida’s out,” they’ll exclude them.
Well, Zinke said that, but it was never the case. By law, once the process begins, they must include the areas through all the stages — you can’t pull states halfway through. But they’ll look at where might be most profitable — where it might be omst environmentally damaging. Then, once they announce the proposed plan, it will initiate a 90-day comment with more public information sessions. So we still have one more chance for public input.
So we’re basically where we were in March 2016. We’re just waiting to see if we’re included. What’s the consensus?
Anything could happen. But with the info we’re being provided — in light of them looking to hold open houses here and in Wilmington — I would expect North Carolina is being included.
How far off could they drill?
Federal waters go from three nautical miles to 200 miles. But, historically, as far back as the 80s, they’ve looked at a site roughly 40 miles off Cape Hatteras as an area for reserves.
The Deep Water Horizon was 41 miles.
Yes. And we’re deeper than that, so they’re using similar rigs. And that rig was only ten years old when it blew. But what goes unnoticed — or less noticed — is the chronic impact drilling has over time. There’s residual oil that impacts beaches. There’s a lot of material that gets shed during drilling that contains heavy metals — arsenic, mercury, lead, cadmium — that has the potential to be toxic to marine life surrounding the rigs. And then the predecessor to even getting the first rig installed and constructed offshore is seismic testing. That has potentially harmful impacts on not just mega fauna like marine mammals — such as the North Atlantic Right Whale, which is endangered off our coast — but down to the smallest supporting member of the food chain: zooplankton. There was a study done in Australia that showed each of these seismic blasts — and they’re done repeatedly over ten-second intervals — has potential to be lethal to about 50 percent of the zooplankton population. Smaller fish feed on zooplankton; larger fish feed on those fish, including the commercial fish we harvest. So it has cascading effects on the seafood industry.
What about the argument that “we need to know what’s out there” to make informed decisions?
Those surveys are conducted by private companies who sell the data to the oil and gas exploration companies. It’s not made public.
So “we” won’t even know what they find.
No, for that to happen, the government would have to go do the work and then share the data with the private industry.
What about the other arguments — more jobs, energy independence, it’s safe. How are those holding up?
If anything, they’re getting weaker. In fact, the administration reversed the safety standards instituted after BP, saying that regulations to include blowout preventers and more regular inspections are too financially burdensome to the industry. As of this year, we became the leading energy exporter — we’re officially “energy independent.” In fact, the DOI now uses the term “energy dominance” instead. And most of the jobs that are generated will go to experienced workers who’ll be imported from the Gulf. And I think the oil industry is talking about bringing — at most — 30,000 jobs for the whole state. We have 12,000 jobs in Dare County alone. And a $1.1 billion-dollar-a-year tourism industry. So that’s been our argument all along: this is the revenue stream we want to protect.
We know all the Atlantic state governors have asked to be removed from the process, except one. What else is happening to push back?
So, last year, New Jersey, Maryland and Florida introduced bans on drilling activity or the construction of infrastructure that support that industry in their states. There’s a flurry of congressional bills beginning this year, like the Defend Our Coast Act, which was co-sponsored by Congressmen Walter Jones and David Price from our state. And that’s in addition to two lawsuits that are challenging the decision by the Division of Marine Fisheries to issue the incidental harassment authorizations that allowed BOEM the opportunity to issue permits for seismic testing. And more than 200 communities passed resolutions opposing drilling along the Gulf and East Coasts. In fact, all of North Carolina’s coastal counties are opposed right now except Carteret and Brunswick — and Brunswick has reversed their position from being in favor to just taking no stance.
So, it’s not just like a few towns, or a couple governors, or one party. This is a pretty unified line of “no’s.” It sounds like more opposition than last time.
I know. It sounds like it’s been amplified. So it confounds me that they keep pressing forward. But one of the most eye-opening parts of this past year is how intentionally deceptive the process can be. It’s not so much asking, ‘Is this the right thing to do?’ It’s, ‘Can we get away with it?’ And I guess we have to see the proposed plan to really see if all these states and communities who voiced their opposition aren’t included. Or if the federal administration just keeps plowing ahead bullishly and saying, “We don’t care.”
So let’s assume we’re included. What can the average person do?
You can’t officially comment until they release the plan. But, as far as protocol and procedures, right now people can review the draft plan. And they can look at the previous Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2022 plan and prepare a comment letter to submit following the release of the proposed plan. And certainly we’ll be ready to rally and demonstrate and make our voices heard. But contacting state and federal legislators can happen now. And start spreading awareness. Talk to your neighbors: “Have you heard about this?” “Could this impact your business?” “Here’s why it’s bad.” But I don’t think there’s anybody here who isn’t vulnerable. Just look at what erosion does to this area. Or a hurricane. Imagine what an oil spill would do.
Then what?
Once that 90-day comment period closes, BOEM will again review all those comments and prepare the final program and preliminary Environmental Impact Statement. And Congress and the president will have 60 days to review that and decide whether to approve the plan — or not. That’s when we’ll need to lean on our congressional reps even harder.
So, worst-case scenario is they announce North Carolina’s included in the proposed plan—we gotta rally, we gotta submit comments, we gotta pressure our legislators. What if it’s the opposite? What if we wake up and we’re not included?
I think it will depend on what “not included” means. Are they still looking at South Carolina or Virginia? Because then the drilling still impacts us — look at Florida after BP. So we need to pay attention and be prepared to help protect our neighbors.
And what if — least likely of all — they reverse course and nobody’s included?
We wait five more years. They’ll reset the clock for 2024. And we see what the next administration wants to do. But that’s why these congressional bills are really important. Some are five-year moratoriums. Some are complete bans. So tracking these state and federal legislations is key.
Because they could protect us for a longer period of time. It feels like these next few months could very well determine the future of the Outer Banks. Would you agree?
It seems like it. But the opposition is about as prepared as we could ever be. And the Outer Banks community has been stellar. The towns. The counties. The mayors and other officials who spoke at the rally. And everyone else who headed to Raleigh, jumping on the bus in the middle of the week — sacrificing a day of work just to make their voices heard. People here know they have something precious to offer. And they’re fighting to protect it. — Matt Walker
Keep tabs on all offshore drilling issues — including impending meeting dates locations, information on how to comment, and protest opportunities — by monitoring www.DontDrillNC.org. For more on the NC Coastal Federation, go to www.nccoast.org.
_____________________________________________________________
SHRINKING PLANET
Why do some distant cultures share certain traits? Dr. Evert Van De Vliert breaks down the science behind “latitudinal psychology.”
Truth time: we totally thought we were bullshitting this issue’s theme. After all, how could some arbitrary, invisible line on a map influence different cultures all over the earth? Then we did a little Googling, and it turns out we weren’t entirely off the mark.
According to Dr. Evert Van de Vliert, Professor Emeritus of Applied Social Psychology at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, “Different latitudes along the same longitude offer different seasonal cycles of cold in winter, heat in summer, drought and deluge as well as pathogen prevalence. This is bound to have psychosocial and societal consequences, and so it does.”
Enough consequences, in fact, to merit a whole new discipline called “latitudinal psychology.” Over the past two decades, Dr. Van de Vliert’s been a pioneer in the field, revealing that life in countries and states sharing the same degree north or south of the equator can have much in common, “when it comes to creativity, aggression, life satisfaction, individualism versus collectivism — you name it.”
Does that mean you’ll find a bunch of beach bums riding the 36th parallel in the heart of the Middle East? Hardly. But you will find them just across the ocean. And inside any given country or state, you’re even more likely to discover somewhat distant neighbors sharing surprisingly similar values.
We asked Dr. Van Vliert to explain his studies and connect a few dots right here at home. — Matt Walker
The following interview was conducted via email in September 2018. An edited version appears in Issue 7.4
MILEPOST:What is your full name/title/position? And at what schools/institutes do you work and do research?
DR. EVERT VAN DE VLIERT: Evert Van de Vliert, Professor Emeritus of Applied Social Psychology at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. I have also worked at the University of Bergen in Norway, but am now retired. My current research is done in close cooperation with an international team of colleagues.
How would you describe your research? Is there a specific discipline/science it falls under? How groundbreaking is the field? Is it emerging? Established?
Latitudinal psychology. It’s a brand-new term for an emerging interdisciplinary interest covering geography, ecology, and cross-cultural psychology.
How long have you been studying it? What prompted your interest? Was there a specific moment? A relationship between to specific cultures? A series of observations?
I have been working in this field ever since 1995 when I was President of the International Association for Conflict Management (IACM) and had to give a presidential address to IACM members from all over the world. My talk addressed links between ambient temperatures and domestic political violence in 136 countries between 1948 and 1977. Political riots and armed attacks appeared to occur more frequently in warm countries than in both cold and hot countries, after controlling for effects of population size and density as well as levels of socioeconomic development and democracy.
What sort of patterns do you see when looking at cultures along certain latitudes?
What we see, time and again, is that north-south differences dwarf east-west differences in culture. Take, for example, cultural individualism versus collectivism. Against popular knowledge, we find no east-west differences in individualism—collectivism after controlling for latitude and wealth. Instead, we find that collectivism increases from the poles toward the equator in both the Northern and Southern hemisphere.
Can you briefly describe ‘ cultural collectivism’ versus ‘cultural individualism’? Feel free to use examples if it helps.
Individualism pertains to societies in which the ties between individuals are loose; everyone is expected to look after herself or himself and her or his immediate family. Collectivism as its opposite pertains to societies in which people from birth on onwards are integrated into strong, cohesive ingroups, which throughout people’s lifetime continue to protect them in exchange for unquestioning loyalty. North Carolina shows a high rate of collectivism compared to other states.
Why is that? You mention the poles? Are they themselves an influence (e.g. the magnetic energy)? Is it more of the climate itself?
Of course, latitude is an imaginary coordinate that can have no impact at all, and the poles and the equator are not much help either. No, the answer must be sought in the latitude-related ecology. In the running for the explanatory crown are cold stress, heat stress, drought stress, deluge stress, pathogen stress, and poverty stress because all of these stresses are varying along latitude rather than longitude.
How many degrees difference are we talking? Is it 1 degree? 5? 10? 20?
We are not studying ecologies and cultures at bandwidths of latitudes or longitudes but at the precise midrange latitude and midrange longitude of where a population resides. For large countries such as the United States and China, midrange latitude and midrange longitude are nonsense variables, with the consequence that we have to study states or provinces.
How does climate influence cultures then? Temperate (easier) environments make people behave one way? Harsher climates the opposite?
That’s right. As warm-blooded animals we have basic needs for thermal comfort, nutrition, and health. Temperate environments are ideal as they offer comfortable temperatures, consumable flora and fauna, and low disease burdens, with the consequence that inhabitants experience little stress and reduction in control. They tend to create easygoing cultures. In places with colder winters, hotter summers, or both, people experience more climate stress and reduction in control. They require more and better clothing, shelter structures, and heating or cooling systems, increasing investments of time and effort in the pursuit of foods and drinks, and more measures to safeguard family health. As a long-run consequence, and depending on how much money they have to cope with climate, poor populations tend to develop threat appraisals and survival cultures whereas rich populations tend to develop challenge appraisals and self-expression cultures.
Can you briefly describe ‘threat appraisals and survival cultures’ versus ‘challenge appraisals and self-expression cultures’? Again, if it helps, include examples.
People with threat appraisals interpret their place of residence as having threatening characteristics, such as too cold, too hot, too dry, too wet, given the poor income resources to cope with climate. In consequence, they have a survival problem, and attempt continuously to control the situation — they develop a survival culture. People with challenge appraisals interpret the same characteristics as challenging, given the rich income resources to cope with climate. In consequence, their problem is how to handle climate in inventive and innovative ways–they develop a self-expression culture. John Steinbeck, for example, being rich, noted: “I have lived in good climate, and it bores the hell out of me”. Why? Well, he did not have enough daily challenges to spend his money on.
Do temperate cultures also tend to draw more people then? Harsher keep them away? Or does it alter how people deal with those climates?
Well, as you know, arctic and desert areas are not overcrowded. In between these empty areas, our species has learned to cope with harsher climates by inventing and innovating billions of ideas, practices, instruments, and artifacts to deal with our three fundamental problems—how to stay comfortably warm, how to acquire and retain food (especially water, carbohydrates, proteins, and fats), and how to prevent disease.
How does the passing of time influence these traits? (e.g. if a place I easy to live for a long period of time – or hard to live – does it hardwire the character of the town?)
The daily weather has only short-term influences. Persistent cultural values, beliefs and practices are rather shaped by the average weather, i.e., climate. However, this process of niche construction and culture creation takes so long that inhabitants are usually unaware of the impact of their habitat on their habits.
Does that then impact other factors inside that culture? For example, you mention the role economics can play and that a harsher climate, having money can make it easier, which makes people more inclined to seek money. Does that then become a stronger personality trait among those cultures?
Sure, the arctics and deserts also exemplify the impact of climate on how difficult it is to eke out a living and create the cash and capital needed to deal with all the consequences of the cold or the heat. As a consequence, yes, our research has shown that poorer people in harsher climates are working more for money than for fun.
Describe your thermometer for “livability.” Is that strictly about temperature? Or something more?
Much evidence indicates that an ambient temperature of 720F (~ 220C) is optimal for thriving of plants and animals, and for psychosocial functioning of humans, who feed on plants and animals. It is the approximate point where the metabolic rate required for the clothed individual is both minimal and independent of the ambient temperature. Relatedly, it is the temperature preferred by tourists, too. Even more importantly, basic needs for nutrition and health are met more easily in habitats endowed with abundant flora and fauna amid supportive seasonal temperatures.
What about economics? Is it safe to say you’ll put up with less money — or higher costs — for a better climate? (In Florida and California, they call it the Sunshine Tax.)
Indeed, economists see climate as a commodity, have modeled climates, and have estimated their prices. My thermometer for livability can be used also as a scale for guesstimating the price of a place of residence with given winters and summers. Smaller upward and downward deviations from 720F should lead to a higher price for the local climate, thus a lower monetary compensation for working and living in that local climate.
You note that 72 degrees is the optimum temperature? On the Outer Banks —roughly 35.1 to 36. 8 degrees north — our year-round is roughly that, but it’s also got wider swings — we have week-long freezes, and hot, humid summers. How does that alter the “livability” factor? And what sort of traits would you anticipate to find here?
I am not familiar with the Outer Banks but may perhaps assume it to be not too different from the Caribbean, an excellent example of a region where easygoing cultures prevail. The Caribbean lifestyle on Jamaica, Haiti, Puerto Rico, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Barbados, and numerous smaller islands, is relatively relaxed. These islanders tend to shun both working for money and working for achievement. Neither survival pressures nor self-expression pressures seem to weigh heavily on the islanders’ thoughts, emotions, and actions.
I’ve found we’ve got a mix of traits on the Outer Banks. We’re a summer beach town, but we have pretty harsh weather at times (winter storms and hurricanes). We’re also quite isolated and small. (Our county of 37,000 year-round people is 90 minutes to two hours from the nearest city, Norfolk/Virginia Beach — an hour more if you live on the southern end, where options get more remote and the climate/opportunities rougher.) But we’re also a very natural setting with great surfing, fishing, kiteboarding, nature. For decades, people moved here would sacrifice income and careers to have access to those attributes. It’s also a rough economic climate — it’s hard to make money, but our culture is actually pretty laid back and friendly, with a community that shares a passion for the outdoors. So, it’s hard work for little financial reward — but also a pretty carefree, close community that’s tight and conflict-free. Does that fit into your observations? Why or why not? And are there places you think of on near the 36-degree line that fit that pattern?
Now that you have filled some gaps in my knowledge, this cultural pattern does not surprise me. It sounds easygoing and relatively collectivist as is the case in the Caribbean.
How specific can these changes be? There’s roughly 1.5 degrees between Corolla and Ocracoke. Ocracoke is an island to the south you can only reach by ferry, with a year-round community of 500 that’s existed for 300 years. Corolla is almost a tourism suburb that’s sprouted up in the past 35 years and is on the northern border. What similarities might we assume? What differences? And is there a point where certain elements — isolation, time — will outweigh geography and climate?
It is always difficult, if not irresponsible, for a scientist to generalize from research results based on a worldwide cloud of data points to a single dot somewhere on the planet.
Obviously, the Outer Banks is a tourism-driven community, more than anything. Do tourism-based communities see changes faster, because of the influence of people from other latitudes? Or do islands stay more resilient because of their isolation?
We never studied the spatiality of tourism, nor the specifics and particulars of islands.
This all started because of my curiosity of looking east along the 36th parallel and seeing what places we shared a latitude. I’ll give you some examples of what I found, that seems similar, and maybe you can suggest a reason behind it — or dispel my inclinations. Southern Spain (this seems like the most obvious parallel): directly across the Atlantic from our main towns, you reach find small Spanish beach towns with small year-round populations, such as Zahora, where city people spend their summers (like here.) There are little bars, and people who camp. There’s even a cape with a lighthouse (we have 4 lighthouses, and one cape). It’s also just south of Cadiz, home to a long-standing fishing culture. (Before 1950, we were entirely fishing/seafaring – or piracy.) Besides, Cadiz, and some small “Frontera town” they’re about 2 hours form the closest big city with an airport — Seville. (Like here.) So relatively isolated, with lots of open space and national parks. (Like here.) There’s even a town called Tarifa, that’s the kiteboarding capital of Europe —our Cape Hatteras is kiteboarding capital of the East Coast. Is that all coincidence? Or is there some mix of geography and climate? Or psychological attitudes? (Reliable jobs are in the city; fishing on the coast, which was us before tourism.)
Of course, that is no coincidence. Your observation fits in nicely with our repeated finding that north-south differences in culture dwarf east-west differences in culture. For climatic, pathogenic, and economic reasons, these longitudes along roughly the same latitude are expected to have roughly the same cultures.
Then there are other discoveries that likely coincidence — but just seem weird. For example, because we’re the closest land body to the Gulf Stream, our fishing port of Wanchese, sends tons of seafood to places up and down the East Coast — it so happens the world’s largest fish market is in Tokyo, and is just .2 degrees off of the Wanchese. Or, the Outer Banks is known for begin able to drive on the beach. Pismo Beach — which is on the same latitude — is the only place you can drive on beach in all of Central or Southern California. Or, in the ‘50s, the Outer Banks was almost made a test site for nuclear testing — we share the same latitude as the Los Alamos Nuclear Research facility, site of the first tests? Am I just seeing relationships that don’t exist? Is it just, again, the odds of looking at such a huge region? or am I missing something?
Societal functioning has many fathers and mothers. It would be no less than silly to attempt to explain all pattern complexity with one single most important theory or field such as latitudinal psychology.
One thing your research mentioned was that communities behave similarity on opposite side of the poles. That they can be mirror images. I did some checking. The closets town to our coordinates Santa Teresita, Argentina. It so happens it’s basically a beach town like here — similar population (roughly 6k people) and similar age. (50 years old.) Is that a coincidence too? Or is that pattern? Or something in between?
I would not be surprised if a study would show that climate accounts for this covariation.
Are there any distinct geographic patterns that are unexplainable, where certain places seem to have a stronger impact on people/history? For example: you hear people talk about earth’s “chakra points.” People even say that Cape Hatteras is some sort of magnet that draws people — residents and visitors alike. Or do people just make this stuff up based on other existing beliefs?
I am not aware of any scientific evidence supporting these claims, i.e., no accurate descriptions that document the phenomenon, let alone predictive and/or explanatory studies that deserve serious attention. Yes, human beings do relate to certain places, so much so that they prefer to migrate to regions with similar climates (e.g., English emigrants in Australia and New Zealand, Amish and Mennonites in North America, etcetera). No, there is no magnetic energy pulling people to Outer Banks; it is simply that people use the thermometer for livability to select their holiday options.
Do all cultures place a level of importance on certain places, whether it’s spiritual or cultural (e.g. holy sites and monuments)? And if so, why? What fundamental need does it serve?
There is little doubt that the inhabitants of all places on Earth have adapted multiple habits to their geographic habitats. That said, people around the globe differ considerably in the extent to which they recognize that, emphasize it, and manage it. One reason is that people are motivated to perceive themselves as having control over their lives. Again, this is not a simple mechanism as there are at least four fundamental processes to achieve and maintain control.
Can you expand upon the that motivation for people to perceive themselves as having control over the lives? Is this universally shared among all cultures?
Yes, it is a universal motivation: people everyday, everywhere want to perceive themselves as having control over their lives.
______________________________________________________________________
REVERSE PSYCHE-OLOGY
The less you care about an election, the more it probably matters.
On Nov. 6, Outer Bankers will once again mobilize en masse, packing the polls to make decisions that will determine the fate of our nation, our state — our very neighborhoods! (Yeah, sure.) Maybe if it was 2020. Then roughly two-thirds would crawl off the couch to pick a president. But when it comes to mid-term elections, history indicates less than half of Americans will bother to cast a ballot. And it only gets worse from there.
“All of the energy and all of the interest [in America] is geared toward presidential years,” says Dr. Michael Bizter, a Catawba College political science professor and researcher who specializes in North Carolina races. “But when you have mid-term election years — and even worse, what we call ‘odd year’ elections for local government — turnout just plummets. And if you’re one voter out of 30,000 — as compared to 300,000 or 3,000,000 — that vote speaks exponentially louder than people’s who don’t vote, in terms of engagement.”
Not just in terms of percentages — but in steering politics as a whole. Turns out the most frequent voters are also the most fervent ideologues. Without the full spectrum of views to dilute the diehards, parties only move further apart — especially as campaign managers and politicians court the most reliable voters to win elections — leading to increasingly extreme candidates who most people feel less comfortable supporting.
The good news? According to Bitzer, our political make-up is getting more diverse — and looking a little less lazy. We asked the good doctor for a check-up on our county and state’s current voter profile, and what each citizen can do to keep our democracy healthy. — Matt Walker
This article appears in the 7.3 issue of Milepost, which printed Fall 2018.
MILEPOST: How does NC compare with the rest of the U.S. when it comes to turnout? Are we as lazy as I think?
DR. MICHAEL BITZER: We’re pretty typical. Two-thirds of registered voters show up for presidential years. That’s the norm for the nation as a whole. When it comes to midterms, that typically drops to the low- and mid-40 percent. But for odd years, which is the level of government that affects citizens on a day-to-day basis, very few people participate. In the city of Charlotte, last year’s mayoral election had maybe 15 percent voter turnout.
What about state trends overall?
North Carolina has trended left significantly. In 2000 and 2004, we were 13-point Republican favorites. Meaning George W. Bush won this state by 13 percentage points. In 2008, Barack Obama won by less than half a point. And that’s when North Carolina started to become more competitive. We still lean slightly to the Republican side — Trump won by three-and-a-half points — but it is much closer than those 13-point blowouts.
But at the same time, we have a staunchly Republican state legislature. Is that because of gerrymandering? Or something different?
That certainly plays into it. What we tend to see is that we voters have sorted ourselves into likeminded communities. And there’s more and more polarized voting going on at the local level. But certainly, gerrymandering doesn’t help matters. So when we have districts so heavily drawn one way or the other, it does make a difference.
That’s interesting, because the Outer Banks is pretty much half and half, while our inland counties are more right. I think that’s partially because we get so many people moving in from other areas. Is that normal for coastal communities where you get these hodgepodges of people?
I think. Certainly, North Carolina has been influenced by in-migration. Certainly, retirees in that area would play a pretty significant influence. Rural areas are going to be more Republican. Urban North Carolina is trending much more democratic. But actually, if you isolate suburban counties around Raleigh and Charlotte, they are the most Republican counties.
We definitely occupy a more suburban socio-economic demographic. When you look at Dare County numbers, do you see any revelations that bear that out? Or any insights as we compare to the rest of the state?
Right now, if you break down the state numbers, it’s 38 percent registered Democrats, 31 percent Unaffiliated, and 30 percent Republican. In Dare County, Unaffiliated is 39 percent. Registered Republican is 31 percent. And registered Democrat is 29 percent. You have more registered unaffiliated voters than Democrats or Republicans. And that’s kind of where things are headed in the state.
What about on the age breakdown? Are we younger, older, the same?
In the state, we’ve had a pretty significant change — we’ve got about 6.9 million registered voters. Right now, voters under the age of 37 — what we would call Millennials and Generation Z — they’re now a plurality. Their numbers tend to be 32 percent of the total statewide. Baby Boomers are 31 percent. The generation in-between — Gen X — is about a quarter, at 26 percent.
Dare County is a little bit older than the state: 23 percent of the voters are Millennial or Gen Z; 41 percent are Baby Boomers, with 25 percent Gen X. So, statewide, that Gen X and Millennial group is more than Boomers. But while they may be the plurality as registered voters, they do not show up as much. Baby Boomers tend to be a plurality of votes among those who cast votes.
Why do you think that is?
It’s a common dynamic. When you’re young, you haven’t established real roots, perhaps, in a community. But as you grow older, you become more invested in your community. You become more aware of the issues. And you tend to vote more frequently.
So the group with the most political power right now is also the least likely to use it?
That’s the great question for this year’s election: will that trend be bucked by younger voters who seem to have awakened? In terms of the dynamics, with Millennials almost reaching 40, this could be a kind of transition election. But it will be interesting to see if the energy and enthusiasm among young voters is still there this fall. Because midterms are traditionally an older electorate than what we see in presidential years. And the Baby Boom generation tends to lean more Republican.
We keep talking about Democrats and Republicans — but then you say we’re one-third unaffiliated.
Well that is a very common misperception about unaffiliated voters. If you ask the standard three questions — “Are you Democrat, Republican or Independent?” — a significant plurality will say, “I’m an Independent.” And this is particularly true among young voters. The following question that has to be asked is, “Do you lean to one party or the other?” And if someone leans to one party, they will vote in a partisan way just as much as people who identify with that political party. If we look back to 2012 and 2016, less than ten percent of the national electorate were pure Independents who split their votes pretty evenly. If you go to an Independent who leans more Democratic or leans Republican, they’re voting for their party 80 percent of the time or more. So they may eschew the party label, but they are pretty reliable party voters.
It does feel like people vote party over country more. And that disillusionment must drive even more people to say, “I don’t want to vote,” because it feels useless. Right?
The parties have become more ideologically coherent. There is party loyalty and a sense of tribalism on both sides. Among voters, it has become a sense of, “I’m not voting for my party as much as I’m voting against the other party.” But folks who are registered partisan in the state have higher turnout than registered Unaffiliateds. So, if you’re a candidate or a campaign manager, and you’re talking about 80 percent-plus reliable voters — or a shrinking pool of Independents who may or may not necessarily show up — who are you going to go after? You’re going to go after the reliable vote. And particularly when you get into legislative districts that are drawn in favor of one party or the other, the election that matters isn’t the general election. It’s the primary election. Because if you survive your primary, 85 percent of voters [will vote straight down the ticket.]
And by not voting, people send a bad message to the candidates themselves. You’re doing yourself a disservice. Because even a losing vote represents a potential change in policy stance.
Yes. Very much so.
So every vote really does count. Even if it feels like you’re not having an impact. In fact, it’s almost a reverse scenario — the less important an election feels, the more important it probably is.
Yup. But all elections have consequences. Look at the recent uproar over Anthony Kennedy’s retirement and the opportunity for Republicans to add a fifth member to the Supreme Court. Or issues on the local level, decisions that get made by local communities [that impact daily life]. This is a democratic republic. We rely on citizens to not just voice their concerns but to engage in electing their leaders. And I think for the average citizen, if they complain about the decisions being made, they need to engage themselves. And even if they’re on the losing side, at least their voice is heard.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
What’s wrong with bland? Nothing, if you’re a communion wafer — or a cardboard box. Bland is safe. Bland is consistent. Easy. But in our modern economy, just being safe and consistent can mean being ignored. And no business can afford that — especially when tastes are constantly changing, and so many more choices are clamoring for attention.
“People always have to be looking at their brand to see what needs to change to fit what people’s priorities and desires are,” says Karen Brown, president and CEO of Outer Banks Chamber of Commerce. “Even we as a group have had to change the way we deliver our services and how we do our fundraising and programming.”
For retailers, that might mean serving champagne with shopping. For restaurants, it could be an interactive cooking night — or just going gluten-free. For the chamber, it’s not just upgrading their own events; it also includes creating a brand initiative for the products born right here on the Outer Banks. We sat down with Brown to get her take on today’s tougher issues, and what folks can do to cook up more business. — Matt Walker
So, first things first: what’s your name and title?
Karen Brown, president and CEO of the Outer Banks Chamber of Commerce.
How long have you been with the chamber?
Five and a half years.
What were you doing before that?
I was a chamber president. I’ve been a chamber president for the past 18 years. I was in the middle of Georgia. I was the economic developer and the chamber president there. And I was in Bonita Springs, Florida for 7 years. I wasn’t the president though. I was the Training and Development Director.
Where are you from originally?
I’m originally from Millsville, NJ, which is near Ocean City. In 2000, my husband and I moved to Florida to be near his mother. My mother in law had a small business and wanted to join the chamber. So I went with her and they had a job opening – and the rest is history. [laughs]
So what does the chamber do?
In a nut shell, I like to say we provide the opportunity for business success. We provide a lot of tools to the business community. We have the network opportunity, certainly. People like to do business with people they know. So the networking is important, building relationships with other businesses so you know who you need to call for services or refer people to for services. We also offer training and development for the business community. We offer connections to business resources — I’ve had 3 call this week like that — where people need help. They need financial help or they’re looking to expand or they need some work force. And we have all kinds of partners we can refer them to: NC Works, the workforce development board, the small business center. There’s all sorts of resources at the state level we can refer them to. We also provide legislative advocacy, to make sure the community stays business friendly and to respond to those issues that affect our business community. Which are many, because everything has that dotted line back to business. Even — say – the plastic bag issue because if it impacts the tourist experience its’ going to impact our business community. So advocacy is a big one for us. So is economic development. We now do economic development for Dare County. As a chamber we cover Currituck, Dare and Ocracoke. Economic Development we just do Dare County. The other counties have their own, but we work together. We do a lot of things that people don’t realize. A lot of the things that people think just happen, the chamber does it — or gets it started or helps it along.
It’s more than just ribbon cuttings.
Yeah. And we’re a non-profit. We’re a 501 C-6. We’re not a part of the government or funded by the government. Everything we do is funded by our members. It’s membership, investment and our non-dues revenue. So those fun things like the reverse raffle or the golf tournament, we do those to get that non-dues revenue in.
Sounds like you’re a resource, too. If you’re a member and have a question and don’t know what to do next, you can tell them who to talk to.
That’s why our tagline is “simply connect.” Because we help connect businesses with who they need. Sometimes we have the answer. Sometimes it’s somebody else.
And you’re not affiliated with the US Chamber?
We’re not a member. I like to say we have the same last name but we’re not related. Just like having the last name “Brown.” [laughs] They’re a membership organization and they enjoy having Chambers of Commerce as their members. We’ve elected not to be members. I don’t feel they’re really representative of our small business community. By definition, small business is 500 employees or less. That’s the national definition. I don’t think they’re in tune with what happens in coastal communities. A lot of times I’ll hear from them, and I’ll say “that’ why we’re not a member because you don’t listen to us. We are a member of the NC chamber. We don’t always agree with them either, for sure, and we go up there and let them know that. But we want a seat at the table. Especially for state issues. If we’re not a member they don’t have to listen to us. But if we are a member, then I can be a squeaky wheel. They may not change their mind, but I can at least make an argument.
And you can say, “they didn’t listen.” What were Bonita Springs and Pike County like?
Bonita springs is a lot like here. It started as a little fishing village on the road between Fort Myers and Naples, Florida. And it’s grown in to a tourism destination. It’s not out-and-out island, so it has some differences, culturally. Like, they have an international airport pretty close by. They definitely have more retail. More corporate economic development. They just had Hertz open a corporate center because of the airport. So similar, but different. Members have a lot of the similar issues and challenges that we have here. Pike County, GA, is a small inland county. Very, very rural. Like, one traffic light in the whole county. It’s made up of small towns with incorporated areas. Membership is always similar in that it’s small businesses with 50 and under employees — that’s typical. And I did economic development there, trying to recruit businesses. And that was in the area of Georgia where there used to be old mills. Cotton mills. They made a lot of fabric. One company there made the Nomex material for the Army , the digital camo. And then racing suits from NASCAR. Totally not a tourism destination. Totally opposite from Florida. So it was wonderful to come here. I grew up on the Jersey Shore , so I missed being near the water. It gets in our blood.
And the brand is there. It’s very identifiable. And our beach sells itself, you don’t have to tell people.
It’s so unique here. I loved the Jersey shore, too. You have the boardwalk and the retail development right there. And it’s so different here, because you don’t have that. And I think that’s what makes it so unique and special. I feel like people come here to take a breath and relax. And they feel like they can do that. And you don’t come on vacation here if you want to go every day.
I’m sure that can be tough because there’s always pressure to create more business opportunity. To add more people or more things that could generate more foot traffic. There has to be a segment of the business community that says, “We would love to have a boardwalk.” And you always hear people say, “I don’t want to be VB.’ But somewhere out there is a person who sees VB and says, “I want that.”
[laughs] Well, if you look at Duck, we do have a little boardwalk — on the soundside. But I don’t hear a lot of that. What I hear more is “We don’t have town centers.” Manteo is walkable. And people are looking for that walkable experience. That’s one thing I hear people say they wish we had a little more of.
That makes sense. And I don’t think that’s necessarily contradicting, either. Manteo is not Atlantic City. And neither the Duck Boardwalk.
No. It’s not lined with bars and restaurants and amusements where you go at night and tell the kids, “Go have a ball.” And when I got here I was reminded of that. And I do think that makes unique. But sometimes people come here looking for that.
Well, people do get nostalgic over Dowdy’s and the Foosball Palace. And the carnival was well received. And even the Atlantis, for adult fun. I think we’re going to miss Kelly’s because it was a reliable night life for people who came into town.
Yeah. I think the one thing we lack here — good bad or whatever — is a large event space. Not like a 2000-seat place, just a 500-seat place. You think about the non-profits who do annual meetings, we’re very limited. I have the Governor coming, I can get 200 people in that room, that’s it. And I’m sold out and it’s a month away. That I hear as more of desire than anything. It could bring more conventions here if we had more meeting space. Do we want that? I don’t know. There are some people who do. But I wouldn’t mind having a large venue for the wedding expo or the hospital gala — all those things need a larger indoor venue.
Especially in winter. But even in summer the weather is an ex factor. So how would you describe this economy. What are its strengths? What are it’s challenges?
It’s strengths are certainly our culture and our people. People feel very welcome here. You don’t always get that through social media [laughs] but for the most part we’re a pretty welcoming community. Again, people like to come here and relax. And they find they can do that. The challenges for our business community continue to be — and we’re in the middle of our annual survey — but they continue to be workforce and housing, which go hand in hand. Housing has hit a crisis level now. And part of it’s because we have the two bridge companies here taking up a lot of seasonal and year round housing. And we started a community housing initiative group to see what can we do. But what we need is more inventory in the market for more year-round rental properties. The hospital lost a couple of professional staff because they couldn’t find a place to rent. The college was all lined up to do a new program and the instructors got here, couldn’t find a place to rent ,and turned around and left. We don’t have that program. That’s the crises level that we’re hitting now. That’s a real problem.
And that’s a tough one, too. Because how do you solve it? It’s not so much the lack of housing as the cost of real estate and wages and everything else. It’s not so much you can’t find a place, you can’t afford it.
But if we get more inventory, the prices would come down. And we do have a couple of developers that are certainly interested in trying to help, but the dollars have to work.
And that’s what’s hard. And I don’t even know how you can control that. I’ve sat in those meetings. But who’s to dictate that a higher density condo won’t just turn it more expensive beach rentals? It would take a lot of inventory to depress our prices. So how do you do that?
We’re looking into some things. A non-profit could own the development and get some grant money to keep costs down. There’s ways to do it. but we have to be open minded and visionary. And when you have land that has high value for other purpose it’s hard to sell that.
It is. I don’t blame anyone for making a buck. But when I lived here the first time, I washed dishes and still lived here. I don’t know how people can do that anymore unless they’re grandfathered in. if you don’t have an affordable rent or mortgage right now, you’re not gonna get it. Beach boxes are $250,000.
We just bought a house 3 years ago and I’m still in sticker shock. We probably could’ve bought 3 houses for the same amount in New Jersey where I was living. But it’s the price you pay for living at the beach, fine, but I don’t know how our service workers and entry level people can afford it. It really has to be difficult. And we’re seeing that: how many “help wanted” signs are we seeing? It’s terrible. And it was bad last summer, but I think it’s going to be worse this summer.
And it’s sort of a self-feeding cycle. Like the Air BNB thing. I know a lot of people who need that income to survive, but it makes it harder for other people. And I think people underestimate how interconnected it is. I’m not worried about work force housing, but a lot of our advertisers are. And some are mom-and-pops; they may not need people or houses, but their clients do.
And if they’re spending all their money on rent every month, they don’t have the disposable income to support other stuff that’s here. The retail, the restaurants, even the mechanics, they just don’t get that done. But we have some out of the box ideas, and we’ll see where they go.
Is it helpful to get input on this stuff?
Like housing? Yes, it’s helpful. But I’m not sure who much more input we need. I guess it depends on the kind of input. We know it’s a crisis. We know where the market needs to be where people can afford it. We’ve collected all the ordinances from the towns and we’re just getting started looking at those things. And we’ve hired a housing consultant to see what sort of solutions or programs might be. But we don’t need a housing consultant to tell us what the problem is. We know what the problem is [laughs]
So, looking at Dare County, our tourism economy alone went up 40% between 2008 and 2016. Less than 10 years. That’s not normal right?
That’s very fast. Very fast. Abnormally fast, I would say.
Is that part of the problem?
Sure. Any time you grow that fast and haven’t had time to react to that type of growth, whether it’s through land use plans or overlay districts or whatever it is, development just happens. And then all of a sudden we go, “We should’ve done this instead.” And it happens everywhere; but here it happened extremely fast.
And I don’t think every restaurant’s up 40% either.
That’s because there’s probably 40% more restaurants.
Is that what it is?
Yeah! Look at the grocery stores. There are 3 new grocery stores or chains that are competing with the Food lion. And now Publix is here
That is a lot.
And they’ll do their research on traffic counts and making sure there is enough of a market to support them knowing that all these other grocers are out there. They do their homework. And I’m certain this summer every grocery store will be jam packed. They won’t have to worry. It’s more the offseason.
I feel like we’re at a crossroads of becoming a bigger beach town than we used to be. And a lot of what’s going on is people figuring out: how does that work? But some is positive for sure. We have more options than ever.
It’s positive for sure. But it puts a strain on that part of the economy that struggles to find a place to live. You need more service people but we can’t house them, so it’s a conundrum.
Someone was saying that Publix should’ve put some apartments on top.
They could’ve done something. Not that anyone brought it to their attention. But I think that’s part of the conversation we need to start having with these big boxes — if we get them — any bigger company, we should say, “Have you thought about housing for your employees?” Why couldn’t they have just bought a couple of houses and put employees in.
That’s what some restaurants have done.
In Publix’s defense, I’m not sure anyone brought it to their attention. And they may not have trouble finding people but, they’ll take it from other grocery stores. It all comes down to housing.
But, one of my biggest beefs, is people move places — just people – and don’t do any research. All those people needed to do was go into Food Lion and seen the poster board saying, “our summer employees need housing.” Or Lidl. How could they submit plans without checking building codes first?
Well, I talked to them, and I said, “Have you thought about housing?” And they said, “Well, we’re not here to fix your problem.” And I said, “well, it’s going to be your problem if you can’t get workers because they can’t live here.” I wasn’t trying to be smart; I was just saying they should think. But the grocery stores know they can make big money because we have big houses and people shop for a big part of their vacation.
And then the restaurants get mad….
Yes!
Explain this: it seems like you’ll get two different takes at any given time. Retail people will say, “It’s killer’ and restaurant say “it’s not.” Or the other way around. Why? Is there a pattern?
I don’t know, but it’s always one or the other.
The other one you hear is bad weather is great for restaurants.
Well everything here is weather-related. We’ve been lucky with the Seafood Festival to have great weather every year.
You mentioned options. It feels now like we’re almost a city of 250,000 people. Not really, the options we have are here because of those people. Trio wouldn’t have exited here 20 years ago. You would’ve been able to buy wine, but…
That experience would not have been here.
Even the type of people who would want to have that experience would not have been here.
So what do you think is the most unique business you’ve seen come along then?
We have people in this area making sunblock products and lip balms. Skeeter Beater is making mosquito spray. All these things that are happening because we’re this great tourism economy. We did a bubble chart that tried to captures all the industries in Dare County. We couldn’t do it all, but tourism drives all these other things The boat building, the charter fishing, which then drives cabinet making and electrical and painters. All that stuff. It’s all a big trickle down.
What I’ve seen is more business that are creating an experience. Like the Escape Rooms or Grand Staff and Stein recreating speak easy. Instead of just doing something, they get engaged in activity. I had a guy in here last year who ended up in Myrtle Beach who wants to do water bikes. So you’re engaged in an activity instead of sitting and watching a dolphin tour — although I love dolphin tours. That’s the difference to me. Even Publix is trying to create an experience. I walked in the other night and they handed me a paper; it’s ‘Meet your management night’ and I need to get each manager to sign a coupon and if you bring it back you get an even bigger coupon.
The other thing I’ve noticed is the level of detail. We don’t just have a Pet Smart — we have a Holistic Pet Store. The layers of options and boutique-ness that never existed. There’s also more competition And there’s new ideas.
Well, the Adventure Park is another experience.
Exactly. It’s not Dowdy’s. But it’s a version of it.
It’s a version that people really get engaged in. They physically get engaged in it. Versus going to a movie theater and watching it.
Or sitting in a tilt-a-whirl and just holding on.
I think it’s just the way people want to do thing snow. They want to be a part of it. But there are still people like me too. I love the movies! I’m not getting on that Adventure Park Thing. [laughs]
It’s an interesting point. Because you might make the argument that the holistic a pet store is an experience, because you’re going to see other organic pet friends.
It makes people feel good. And people like to feel good. Is it good or the environment? Is it good for my pet? Is it good for me? Even Dr. Bowen is now a holistic doctor instead of a doctor who writes a bunch of prescriptions. I think people are looking for alternatives.
Medicine is definitely an example. We have way more options now. It’s almost like a city experience. I mean, there might have been one or two chiropractors 20 years ago, but there’s a bunch now. Or yoga studios. Or fitness in general. It’s not just the gym or the Y. You can go to yoga. You can go to boot camp. You can go to yoga boot camp…
You can go to yoga on the beach, you can go t to hot yoga. [laughs]
And the people who go to yoga in March may not be tourists, but they wouldn’t have the studio in the offseason if they didn’t have a tourist market. So the foundation is still the same. And that make every challenge everyone’s challenge.
Even the chamber has to adapt. This is a weird example, but we used to do a sit down ‘rubber chicken’ dinner where we gave a few awards. Last year, we said “Enough. No more rubber chicken dinners. We need to change what we’re doing.” So we made it more of an experience. We did a heavy hors d’oeuvre cocktail reception out at Festival Park, then went into the theatre and made it more of an awards show. Even we’re looking at how can we engage people better. People aren’t looking to go to those rubber chicken dinners any more. They want something different. Chamber people call it rubber chicken because every time you go to a banquet you get chicken. You always get chicken.
Because a rubber chicken would be a great award.
[laughs] Maybe. But even we’ve had to change the way we deliver our services and how we do our fundraising and programming to make sure people want to come to it.
That’s an interesting point. I think it’s a challenge for any business to reinvent themselves. Especially if you’ve been here for 50 years, doing the same thing. I mean, if you’re John’s Drive in, you don’t have to touch a thing. But you can see if you’re fried fish restaurant whose done it one way forever to look down the street and see something totally new — that could be scary.
Yes. Well you always have shave to be looking at your brand to see what needs to change to fit what peoples priorities and desires are. I mean, everyone’s into gluten-free and low- carb, healthy eating, so you have to make sure you’re appealing to that group. Whereas us baby boomers eat as much meat and potatoes you can put in front of us.
Well, tastes are getting more refined, too. A buddy of mine owns a pizza place, and they joke about their wine selection being basically Barefoot. But it might not hurt o have a couple nicer bottles on hand for the occasional wine snob.
Look at the craft beer industry. Heck, 10 years ago, it was Bud or Bug Light. Now everyone wants a craft beer.
And you can see that same level of choosiness in everything. Only don’t you not have traditional restaurants and hotels or rentals; it’s the variety of options. It’s Air BNB. It’s sushi. It’s chefs for hire. It’s killer for the consumer. But it’s scary for any business owner who may never have had to compete on that level.
We have a great business community. And a very successful business community. But I’m surprised by how many don’t have a business plan. Or they haven’t dusted it off in a while to see where they need to widen their view a little.
So, manufacturing: what are people making.
We cover Currituck, Dare and Ocracoke. So, in Currituck you have Carolina Casual Wholesale furniture—he’s up there manufacturing outdoor furniture out of recycled plastic bottles. He’s selling in catalogs and Bed, Bath and Beyond now. You have a kite manufacturer in Currituck. Island Experteez has national contracts. And of course, the boat building in Wanchese, and the cabinet makers — that’s all manufacturing. And a lot of little guys do small manufacturing. In Manteo, there’s a guy who does engraving and trophies and glass etching. And surfboard builders. And then of course you’ve got the service industry; HVAC guys, and electricians and plumbing. But those guys are all heavily tourism dependent, too. The boatbuilders might be the exception, they might be there anywhere, but tourism introduces a lot of people to the fact they’re here.
Or they go fishing and go “wow!”
Yes. And there’s a guy called OBX Deck Dining. And he makes a bar top for outdoors, and it has bar stools that fold up into it, so it’s a table that fits on your deck, but it becomes a table, and he’s making it his house! And I found a woman the other day on Facebook who makes beach-glass jewelry and ships it all over the country. So there are lots of little things you don’t know what’s happening.
So describe OBXMADE then.
OBXMADE is to really celebrate things that are made here locally. We started with products, specifically, because to get the trademark we had to be specific. We’ll probably expand out more to include even, say, houses that are made by local builders. But right now it’s products. So I’ll use the Outer Banks Distilling guys as an example. They would apply for the trademark we have. And then we have an advisory board look over the application, and say, “Yes you can use that.” And our hope is they would put that on their label. And that just broadens our reach out into the world. And we’ll have a website and other ways to promote OBXMADE so people who come here and experience being here, get home and say, “I’d really like to have whatever that product is” and find it. And not that they can’t get it now, but they know it’s OBX made. It’s sort of like the old Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval.
So it’s basically a branding effort.
It’s definitely a branding effort. When Dare County did the economic strategic plan last year, we had already started this process, but in there they identified that the county should do a creative branding initiative. And it so happens we had already started one.
So you might get a surfboard with OBXMADE on it. Or a hot sauce…
Yeah! It can be hot sauce, surfboards, jewelry, shirts. Anything that’s OBX MADE. We’re not gonna open a storefront or anything. It’s just promoting and branding our area that much more than we already are.
Does it cost?
There’s an application fee. And it’s $150 annually. But all chamber members get $100 credit so it’s $50 a year for members. And once you’re approved we send the logo and you can use it.
I’ve always thought telecommuting is the answer for our year-round economy. It might not help the housing crisis, but…
It’s happening already. And that’s another area we’re going to start marketing as well. If you can work anywhere, ‘Why not work from the beach?” We have the connectivity. So why not?
It makes total sense. So how aware do you think people are that we’re this interconnected. I feel like in general, we’re a community that supports each other. But I also think people re kind of clueless on how interconnected we are. If people can’t find housing, it sucks for everyone. Are people aware?
I don’t think enough of them are aware of that. If a company closes up or lays folks off, it affects everything: it affects the grocery store, it affects health care, it affects the gas station. I saw an article one time that tracked a dollar as it grows and goes out into the economy. You can also do that in the opposite direction: what happens when that dollar’s taken out of the economy? I think people try to be in tune with everyone else is doing, but at the end of the day, we’re worried about our own checkbook. That’s true of most of us. I’m probably guilty about it too. And I probably care more than most people about this business community. But I will say out here there’s more of an effort to shop and do business with local people. You have to go to Food Lion and Publix, but if there’s a local business people do try hard to support the local guys. If I want a steak, I’m not going to go to — well, I can’t say, because they’re members — but let’s say I’m going go to a local person first.
Or, if you want a burger, you’re not going to do McDonald’s, Maybe. Or are they members, too.
Yeah, they’re members.
Wow. You can’t hate on anybody!
[laughs] Yeah, something like 50% of our businesses are members, which is huge. Most chambers have under 20%.
So what’s the membership then?
We have about 1000 and in our service area there’s about 2200.
Are there any big difference between Currituck and Ocracoke and here, as far as changes? I’m assuming Corolla’s had the biggest jump in the past 20 years but are there other trends?
Well, Ocracoke is struggling because the ferry route’s so long now. Hopefully the new passenger ferry will help them in the summer time. I think July’s their target date. And they’ll do four trips a day, which should be cool. I can’t imagine they won’t do more because I think there will be a high demand. But the Ocracoke businesses are obviously very supportive of each other. Currituck is interesting. I feel like Currituck is like Jersey — you have the south and the north. Because Moyock is so close to Chesapeake, they’re more in tune with that. And that’s a struggle sometimes. And now they’re really trying to promote a mega-site, Currituck Station. I think they’re hoping to get people from Virginia to come move over. But we really don’t have many members above Shortcut Road because it’s hard to service them. And we travel to Ocracoke two or three times a year to meet with members.
It’s always seemed weird to me that Corolla’s Currituck. But that’s where they get all the money, so it’s not going anywhere.
Yeah, they’re not going to give it up.
So, challenges. We talked bout year round housing. What are the other threats?
Work force is another. Like, the average age of an HVAC worker is 56. They’re all going to start retiring, and we’re not backfilling. So it’s the whole educational career technical fields that we need to open up. For a long time, it’s been “You have to go to a four-year college.” We’ve been forgetting those technical trades. And now we’re going to start feeling the impacts. And that’s happening everywhere but we’re gonna feel it here.
There are a lot of HVAC systems here, that’s for sure.
Uh, yeah. And it’s electricians and plumbing — it’s all of that. And I think our new superintendent and COA are working hard to get some that stuff into place and promote it more. Because you can make a good living with a certificate or two year technical degree.
Well, the blacksmith of today is your mechanic. And your computer tech guy. And your HVAC, too – you’ll make that AC work if it’s summer time. And it makes a difference. Because you can’t open a rental or restaurant if that AC is broken. And a lot of people say “I can’t get anyone over here.”
I guess the hospital tracks their stuff all the time. And the birth rate at the hospital went down and they figured out it was because the people having babies are out of that age bracket. And there aren’t new young people coming into the community. That’s interesting . And that scares me a little bit. And again it comes down to housing, and cost of living and can I find a professional job? The tourism industry is great but it doesn’t provide a lot of 40- 50k a year jobs. Or a career job. And those technical careers could provide that kind of salary.
But those are two different skill sets, too. You say this and I think, “I should get my HVAC!” But I can barely screw in a light job.
I know. But hairdressers make a lot of money, too. A good bartender will make a lot of money. A good plumber. A nurse. A phlebotomist, there’s a lot of those jobs we don’t necessarily introduce to the kids. I mean in 8th grade I was going to be a banker, a teacher or nurse — because that was my frame of reference. So you have to find ways to open those horizons.
Most people don’t know what they want to do. But it seems like a lot of these issues just come down to general income inequality. Cost of living. Stuff. What’s the answer there?
Yes. And I guess that’s part of what we’re charged with as an economic developer for Dare County is to try and diversify and bring in some more professional jobs. But that doesn’t happen overnight.
And it doesn’t help the dishwasher or house keeper.
No.
To me, it feels like there’s a lot of people grandfathered in, and they’re older, too.
There will always be some disconnect. But it would be great to get some good jobs where a kid coming out of college could come here and make a decent salary. But we’re always going to need dishwashers and service industry people. We just have to figure out a way to house them. I know there’s a push to pay , what, $15 an hour, but then your room rate’s going to go up…
Well, there are no free lunches, that’s for sure. All those years people went on unemployment, that kept vacations cheaper. Because the alternative was raising prices. But that just goes to show everyone’s connected. And people like to say, “It’s not my problem.”
But it’s going to be your problem. And it may take a couple years, but it will impact you at some point. Of course a lot of people worry about the housing bubble bursting again.
I would say $300k for a beach box sounds inflated. Whether that’s a bubble, I don’t know. I don’t want to see another burst though. What are some other threats? We’ve talked offshore drilling before. That would be horrible.
What about water quality?
I don’t hear a lot about water quality. But certainly insurance is always a big one, everything from health care to property tax, to flood to wind and hail, there are big challenges out there.
And flood gets all the attention, but wind and hail is what kills you.
I know, right? Our flood’s like $500 a year. It’s nothing. I’m happy to write that check. It’s the other one. And there are opportunities to comment to the state on rate hikes. And if they hear form a lot of people out here, hopefully they listen. But insurance is always on the top of business owner’s mind. And a lot is providing health care for their employees. And the chambers used to be able to offer small group insurance, but that all got taken away about 10 years ago. So there’s not a lot of options, especially out here.
What about infrastructure stuff?
Infrastructure is always an issue because we don’t have central sewer for the most part. And a lot of those septic systems are getting old. And we need to start looking at the newest latest ideas to replace those. But when companies want to come in, a lot of them want infrastructure in place. And sometimes county commissioners think we can bring in a 100-person company or call center. But they’re not coming here. The things we’re looking for are smaller employers that might be able to locate here and deal with septic and even a well if they had to.
It is a tiny piece of sand. It can’t be everything to everyone. That’s where telecommuting works.
And our internet access is really good for where we are. So that infrastructure is good. Transportation infrastructure? Our bridges are getting better. But we don’t have any public transportation to think of.
Here’s a threatened species: the taxi. They used to be synonymous with the outer banks. Uber is killing them. And it’s not just people here. It’s people from VB. They need a GPS to get around!
I still think there’s an opportunity to do some sort of trolley service or something. It won’t ever be something that the county does, but there’s an opportunity for a private business. Ocean city NJ had a trolley that only ran in summer. And it only ran on their version of the beach road. But I was really inexpensive. And it was the wedding guys who did it.
It would be a great nighttime idea for drunks like me. Traffic is one you see a lot of people complaining about.
I think that’s getting better. Not volume wise, but we’re better about directing people through Elizabeth City. And they’re done a better job at policing stuff up there. I don’t get as many complaints as two or three years ago. It’s not an outer banks problem. I went home to the Jersey Shore two summers ago, and they’re backed up 30 miles from Ocean City. Bumper to bumper. So more people are just wanting to get where they want to get and everyone wants to drive their own car. And it causes those issues. I don’t know how you can fix that. And I don’t know the latest on the Currituck Bridge. But to me that’s another result of us growing so fast. We didn’t think about getting people through Duck. Planning wise, because it’s 25. Which it should be.
What about the internet? I know retailers are feeling that pinch. But there also seems to be more boutique thing opening.
Well, that’s where I want to shop. Places that are different. And I think they fit the tourist market, too. But those businesses are going online, and that’s how they survive all year, is through their online sales. But that’s impacting everybody everywhere. I mean, Amazon, you can’ t stop that freight train. It’s so easy. A couple clicks and it’s at your house the next day. I mean, how do you compete with that?
Some even give you terms. Break big purchase into payments. So how do you compete with that?
They have to create experiences to get people in there. A wine night, a ladies night, a men’s night….
Are we still growing? Have you noticed businesses leaving?
I’ve seen businesses leave, but I feel like everyone that does two more open up. I don’t think we’ve stopped growing. I’m not sure where we’ll put everyone at some point. Certainly businesses close because they weren’t successful. And a lot of people come here with a dream and they want to live here and they want to own their own business, but they’re just not prepared for the year or two it takes to become profitable – if then.
And overhead here is huge. Probably worse for a business than it is for a person.
And when first got here it was so seasonal. I see fewer places close in the offseason over the past five years. They close to clean or remodel. But more businesses coming in are year round, because they know they need to be to make it work.
So moving forward what’s the ideal solution or grand plan?
To solve all our problems? If we could put a real dent in our housing issues, some of the other issues would ease a little bit. Because if we could get more inventory of rental housing that would drive prices down and experienced workers could afford to live here. That’s a place to start to ease some of the pain we’re experiencing. Our concern is if we don’t fix housing and get some of those help wanted signs to come down, it will start impacting the tourist experience. If they’re at a restaurant, and you’re not getting the best service, are you going to come back? Or if you can’t get in your rental house until 5 instead of 3. We want people to come here and be here. And those thing could impact our reputation and our economy.
I feel like we’re at a crossroads. I think for the longest time, you didn’t come here to make money — you made money in order to be here. A lot of people came here and then figured out a way to make it work — very seat of the pants. What they did was almost secondary to how they got here. And now, there’s clear money to be had. And there’s an influx of businesses coming in to get some. And you are competing with people who are probably coming here make a buck. Lord knows Publix didn’t come here to fish and surf.
That’s a good way of putting it. That’ s a really good point. Because it is a dream. You come with a dream, and it’s “I’ve got to make a living. I’ve got to do something.” And they figure it out. and that’s great. But at some point, you might want to step back and take a look and write it down and say, “How did I end up being successful? And how can I continue to be successful.
So, it may feel like it’s a slacker community, but you can’t be a slacker businesses anymore.
No. You have to work at it. Constantly.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
DECONSTRUCTION ZONE
It’s been nearly 60 years since Oregon Inlet teemed with so much activity. PCL Construction’s Sean Bush describes what’s going down – or, rather, up.
Since 1963, crossing Bonner Bridge has been among the Outer Banks’ more sublime experiences. A soaring opportunity to survey the natural bounty below. For the past two years, however, Mother Nature’s had to fight for drivers’ attentions, as PCL puts together the semi-trusty span’s brand new replacement. Workers north and south of the inlet creep toward the center, laying down giant girders. In the middle, floating cranes assemble precast segments of concrete to create monstrous T-shapes. And every day is a new demonstration in masterful engineering, sparking fresh questions, like, “How does everything fit together?” And, “What if one of those curved, concrete pieces falls?”
“It may look like it’s going to fall off,” says PCL construction manager Sean Bush. “But the same process is happening on both platforms, so you’re always in balance.”
One obvious difference? Size and shape. The new bridge has ten cantilevers and 11 spans, nine of which are high enough to let ships pass underneath if necessary. It’s also longer – 2.8 miles vs. 2.4 – and wider and higher, with a 100-year lifespan. (The old bridge was designed to last 30.) As the new structure takes shape, the old bridge looks more and more like the little brother who never grew up. Yet, despite a couple of weather delays and last summer’s electrical mishap, this massive effort remains largely on schedule, with a ribbon cutting due in November of 2018 – and demolition of the old bridge finishing up by September of 2019.
With the whole process roughly two-thirds complete, we sat down with Mr. Bush to get some insight on how the new bridge is stacking up. – Kip Tabb w/ Matt Walker
The following interview took place in Feb. of 2018. The edited version appears in Milepost 7.1
MILEPOST: First thing that hit me when I saw this photo is they started from that side and went across. And it was like, “Well, maybe it’s because there was no bridge in place to get to the south side and start working your way back.”
SEAN BUSH: I wasn’t there. I don’t know how they were delivering everything. But, probably, quite simply, they started on that side because there’s no bridge to drive across, so they went from point A to point B, which doesn’t’ sound too sexy but it makes sense now. This photo seems to be floating around. But it looks a lot different, doesn’t it? There’s a lot more sand and marsh on the north side now. Because there’s fishing catwalks on both sides, and the north is all dry land now. But at one point so someone was fishing.
Crazy, huh? So let’s start with the basics: name and age.
Sean Bush. I’m 46.
What’s your exact title and what’s it entail?
Construction Manager for PCL. Basically, I have the overall job responsibility. But we’re all a team, right. It takes a whole bunch of people to build a bridge. But I have responsibility of managing the day to day business. I work for PCL’s transportation group- bridges and roads. We get some support from Raleigh. So it’s a big construction job, but it’s a mini company in away, too.
So if this were a construction company, you’d be like the contractor, deciding what gets done each day and paying bills.
Yeah, the administration side isn’t as exciting as putting stuff in the ground, but there is that aspect, too. I’m paying one of our vendors right now who’s producing our precast for us. The bill for this is for $1.8 million bucks. And dealing with the client as well. But we broke the project into two major sections. One we call “the approaches”…
The flat stuff.
The flat stuff and the transitions. That’s the non-floating work. What’s over the sand and marshy water that’s not deep enough to be floating, but not dry enough to be land. And that’s where we have a temporary bridge – what we call “the trestle” – between the two bridges for construction access in between. That’s one whole management group. I has its own project manager that manages the day-to-day work and has his own corresponding field superintendent who oversees day to day operations with the craft workers and hour hourly workers getting stuff built on a daily basis. And there’s that corresponding same team over the marine span. And that’s all the stuff that’s “floating”.
You say, “floating,” The structure’s not floating, right? You’re working on something floating to build with. Like barges.
Yes, so we divide it between the marine team and the approaches team.
So in this photo, they would’ve started with an approach style then transition into marine team.
Maybe. And they might’ve been floating for quite a bit. When you look at how much sand has shifted. I don’t know how deep that water was.
But you oversee both teams.
Yes, and then we have a general superintendent on the project who looks at overall operations in the field. He’s the boots-on-the-ground guy. And we work as a team. And we have other support, too, that shares tasks. We have a controls manager who looks after costing and scheduling. Are we gaining time or losing time? And of course payroll people and an office manager. Safety team. We have three safety guys who are on-site full time. And a full time quality control manager.
It’s a large group.
Yeah, right now we have, I think, 145 managers and then I think we have 45 staff: the approach team, the marine team, support team and administrative team, that are all full-time salaried people.
And y’all go from place to place right? Is it divided by skill type?
Different skills. And who’s available at the time. Who’s the right fit? June will be 23 years for me at PCL, so you cross paths a lot. You become a pretty tight family in a way, because you work so many hours together. And then you might have worked on previous jobs. This job will probably be a three-year job – three-year plus job for some people. Last job, Beth and I were in Connecticut, and that was 6 years. It was a bridge.
Are you pretty much just bridges?
Yup. That’ what I’ve been doing for the past bunch of years. And we built two bridges parallel, it was basically I-95, in New Haven, Connecticut. So the phasing of it made for a long process. We average three years. And you just kind of move around from project to project.
So how does this bridge compare to others? How difficult is it in general – just from your personal experience?
My personal experience is it’s one of the more challenging ones. They all have their unique challenges. What’s challenging with Bonner is the weather and some logistics, just given the whole length and scale and being about 3 miles long. But I always call Bonner a little bit of bridge a within bridge. You have the high level – what we call the navigation spans. That’s the most visible, eye catching part. And that’s almost a bridge in itself. And we call that a pre-cast segmental bridge. And it’s built in a balanced-lever fashion where it looks like a big ‘t’. And we build it in balance, where you put a segment on each side. And we call it “up” and “down” – not to get too technical — you put one up, then you put one down. Then two up, two down. Three up three down. So it’s always in balance.
So what would up be?
Up is a surveying turn: Up station and down station. Here, ‘Up’ is what you’d call north. And down is south. So we’ll just add one to each side. And I’ve done a couple of jobs like that. But you start with a foot in in the water, and you drive piles to create that footing. And then we build a pier up, that’s made of precast pieces. And then we stand two skinny pieces on top of that pier, and connect them. And then we attach segments to each side. So you put one up, and then one down. And there’s something called “post tension” where we run a cable of high strength steel that’s anchored on each side that squeezes the segments together – like beads on a string. And then we put on a number 2 on each side, and run another cable from 2 to 2 and that locks together. And we put those up with aa crane. And then we put on lifters on each side, and they pull up the rest of the segments from the water. And we put on umber 3, then 4, then all the way to 12. And every time you had a segment to each side, you put a cable through. All the way to a 12. And then you have a whole new piling and cantilever that you’re connecting with – and that has 12 pieces on each side too. And you connect those with concrete that’s cast in place. So, all told you have 24 of these 14-foot segments between each piling.
Wow.
Yeah. So one big difference is the old bridge had one, big singular navigation span. And anyone who lives here, who’s familiar with Oregon inlet, knows the sand’s all shifting and shoaling. And that’s why you see the new bridge looks so much bigger, which it is. Because it’s longer spans. But the DOT planned ahead for that natural channel migrating around. So there’ nine spans in that higher level area that the channel can naturally shift around, and then they’ll just move the navigation lights to each span . So if the channel moves, you have 9 different spans to choose from. And they can move the lights. And those navigation channels are what make it looks so much higher. And it’s probably only 10 feet higher, clearance wise, but it’s higher for longer because of those nine channels.
From a profile, it looks like a boa constrictor that swallowed something – it really bulges in the middle – then it tapers down t that low and flat again.
That’s what I was saying about the challenges before that tangent. This precast segment section is almost a bridge within a bridge – its’ 3500, 3600 feet. It’s a decent sized bridge on its own. In terms of challenges, that piece is pretty challenging in itself. But every project as its own challenges – that’s sort of a non-answer. But here, the weather and the inlet are pretty obvious challenges. And working with big heavy structures, takes big heavy pieces of machinery to build them, so we have an enormous equipment fleet.
This photo has four cranes. How many do you have?
Right now? Counting anything that’ll lift, I think we’ll have 19. Given that amount of equipment, every day something is breaking down. And it’s not because of abuse or maintenance, it’s just the probability of having that many moving parts on something. So we have a whole mechanics team. We have six guys who are basically assigned full time to keep things running.
And that’s probably every project.
Some are not as equipment-intensive or fewer barges. And with this many barges, you have a whole lot of tugs and things that can move barges around. I think we have five tugs, and one crew boat, and another little boat. And it’s just more stuff to keep moving.
This bridge on your wall, did you build it as well?
Yes, this bridge is down in Sarasota, Florida. And looking at it its very similar. The difference is it’s very wide structure. Bonner is 42 feet wide, about. This one is 100 feet wide because it has four lanes and a median and shoulders where Bonner is two -lanes. Bu the new structure will be nice; it’ll have eight foot shoulders, so it’ll be nice. But this structure itself is probably equal to the navigation span on the Bonner bridge. This bridge is 65 feet clearance. And the new Bonner Bridge is basically 65 at minimum clearance.
That sounds high.
Not really. That one is a job I did in Blacksburg and we were 180 feet at the middle. We crossed a valley. So that was a 100 feet higher at its very highest. And of course it touches down at the two ends.
Are they similar?
Somewhat. Specifically, my background is in segmental bridges. So you can have a pre-cast segmental bridge, where the concrete comes ready to roll. So you see the big pieces coming down the road. And our pre-caster is up in Chesapeake. But if it’s part of the marine bridge, it comes by water through the Intracoastal Waterway. If it’s part of the approaches it comes by land.
So those giant girders, those are for either side.
Yeah, those were for the approaches. But you can also cast concrete in place. And it’s built the same way, you have a piece of equipment that holds the form that you put on either side, then you pour the concrete in place. And that’ called ‘cast in place,’ because the concrete is cast in its final position. And you still build it the same way, one on each side, keeping it balance. So that’s how we built the bridge over the valley. And that type of bridge good for longer spans. And if you’re crossing a valley or rivers, they have also have less of a footprint when you build them.
What other projects have you done?
When I first got out of school I worked for PCL on the Chesapeake Bay Bridge tunnel. And I moved around. I was in Virginia for six years. And the Florida for nine years. Connecticut for six years.
But it’s bridges
Yeah, it’s bridges. And, generally speaking it’s over water. Even that one valley had a creek running through it. [laughs]
Going over the bridge, you see the T-shape thing, and you think it’s gonna fall. How does that work?
Well, the piece in the middle is actually two pieces. And they’re smaller. But they’re solid. So they’re heavy. And they’re set up on top with a crane. And they’re resting on a bearing that’s up underneath. And then these number 1s sit on the jacks and they give it stability. You’re always heavy one side or the other. And it comes down on a bearing in the middle. And it has a curve shape. And it sits on a bridge bearing that allows it to slide for temperature.
So it’s meant to be adjustable.
Yes, and there’s four big 800-ton metal jacks that let you position. So when we put on the 1s and 2s, we adjust the middle so we’re pointing in the right direction so everything meets up well. And then we lock everything in. And then we start up with the 3s. But it’s all engineered. And its’ll common for this type of bridge. It might look precarious, but there’s a lot of engineering behind it. And these things stake into consideration wind load, and storms, and everything else.
Eight-hundred tons.? That’s huge! What’s that mean….?
It means they can lift 800 tons; and there’s four of them.
How much does each segment weigh?
Each one of these segments is hollow. Because it would be too heavy if it was solid but. But they vary in height. So the bigger ones, the one closest to the pier, they’d be a little over 110 tons. And the small ones get under 100 tons. So that’s an average of 100 tons – so, 200,000 pounds. Which is why we have such huge equipment.
Wow. So when you line it all up, are you using like GPS or is it all engineering formulas or is it a mix?
There’s survey equipment. It might not as be as sophisticated as you may think. There’s quite a bit of math behind it. But when they build the segments, they build them one at a time. And they call it “match-cast.” So they’re poured against each other. So let’s say they’re building number 3, the number 2 is already made, sitting right next to it.
So they basically build the each piece, off site, ready to connect. They know it fits before it ships. It sounds like Legos or something.
It’s a lot like Legos. But if 3 is wet concrete, then 2 is already made. Soo it’s a perfect, Lego fit. So where this fit up becomes critical is when they’re made. And it’s done in a controlled environment. And it’s surveyed to within 1/32nd of an inch. And there a whole spread sheet behind that, because the bridge curves and each segment is slightly different. There’s pie-shaped pieces and everything. So when they comes to us, we’ll use some regular survey equipment and spreadsheets to make sure we point them in the right direction. And so far its’ been really good. But these thing s have a life of their own sometimes. So we precast all of them then put them in storage. They’re made together off-site. And if we’re in a curve – and the bridge has nice curve to it – they’re pie-shaped so that’ll be all calculated when they’re made together.
It’s like a spine of vertebrae is being cast off-site in pieces. And then it comes here, and y’all hoist it up and assemble it.
Yup. And we adjust it and make sure it all fits together. And they’re tight. When we get them here we glue the faces – there’s an epoxy compound that goes on when we squeeze together . And it serves two purposes: the epoxy makes a water tight joint. But it’s also a lubricant before it cures. So you can get that adjustment when you do that post-tensioning. And that post-tension really gives the spine it’s strength. So we pull piece “Up 3” with a lifter, we glue the face, then we hang it the piece temporarily until we can get the “Down 3” piece on. And then you fine tune and adjust, and you run the cable and lock it up.. And these post tensioning cables are high performance steel. So concrete is very strong in compression – it’s hard to crush – but it’s weak in tension. Like chalk. You can crack chalk easily but it’s hard to crush. Steel is really strong in tension. So you combine the high strength steel with the concrete And you put the cables in and pull them tight. And when you’re pulling it tight with these big hydraulic rams, you’re actually stretching the steel like an elastic – as much as steel can stretch – but we just pull the really hard. And if you stretch from 3 to 3, an and then lock it off, it wants to spring back. And that cable compresses the pieces – from 3 , to 2 to 1. And as you add pieces it gets stronger and stronger. So picture a cable goes from 12 to 12, and 11 to 11 – at the cantilever, you have maximum strength. There’s 12 cables going through it. And all that pressure gets transferred down the piling and into the ground.
So that’s clearly different than the last bridge. That’s a whole lot of pilings with spans and concrete on the top.
Yes, that’s what we call a conventional “beam and girder” bridge, with a cast in place deck. So you have a beam, that’s supported by a pier on each end, and then it spans across, and then you cast the deck on it.
Sounds like you’re basically putting down a foundation then icing the cake with concrete.
Yeah, you’re icing the cake. And that’s the conventional bridge. Make one span at a time, just like foot bridge. And then you make multiple spans and connect them.
So starting at the middle and both ends at once, is that just efficiency? Get it done fast?
Yes. It’s faster. The construction schedule is pretty tight. And these days, you never have the luxury to build something in five years. So just given the construction time and the constraints of the schedule. Driving across you see lots of people working in a bunch of different spots. But eventually it all ties in. And we actually did start on the north side – on land. So we have that in common. [laughs] But this whole structure is built off a temporary bridge, what we call at trestle. And it starts connected to land, then we leap frog it along away from land while we build. Once we disconnect, we can continue to use the new as access. And when we’re done, we’ll come out on the water or out of the new bridge.
So we started a the north side and the water, simultaneously. And then we started on the south end. So, there’s 10 cantilevers; 11 spans. And the middle is between 23 and 24. So we started right at the middle, and worked to the south, and now we heave 1, 2, 3 of the 10 left on that segmental bridge. So, it’s basically just scheduling.
How long does it take to put a whole section together? Because it seemed like forever there was just one or two, and now every time it seems like more?
A good day, like no weather – which is a very good day – we can hang two pieces, one on each side. In one day. So you have 12 of those, segments. In theory, you build a whole section in 12 working days. But that never happens, because you have weather or some delay of some kind. So it’s usually a month for each one. Right now we have three to go; I’d expect by may we’ll be finished up with that portion of the bridge.
And then is it all downhill from here? Does it go faster?
The heat will still be on. The pressures stays on until the bridge is all connected. The pressure’s on until the first car goes across.
If it’s super windy do you hold off?
Yes. For a couple of reasons. If it’s super windy, it doesn’t help when you try to lift things and it also kicks up the water. Or you get swells coming in. So we’re very in tune with the weather. A lot of the field guys meteorologists in their own right. They look at all the fronts coming through and predict as much as they can.
How big of a buzz kill were those winter blasts?
Oh yeah. Those were, uh, not fun.
Speaking of delays, how bad was that electrical issue this summer?
Yes, as you know, two transmission lines were damaged, disrupting power to Hatteras and Ocracoke Islands. PCL immediately addressed the issue and established a claim site for the individuals and business that were impacted. Further than that, it’s company policy not to comment on matters of prospective litigation.
All I know is, every time I cross the bridge with my contractor buddy, I go: “You think you’ve got headaches.” How stressful is this job?
I mean, it comes with the territory. All construction has deadlines. And of course, safety at the front of everything we do – it sounds cliché – but our motto is that everyone goes home the same way they came in. But all jobs have stress. How stressful is open heart surgery? I don’t want to do that job.
Has anyone got hurt?
People have. Our goal is zero, but we’ve had some minor injuries. And you deal with that as they come up.
Are people strapped in up there, I assume?
Oh yeah. People wear safety harness if they’re exposed to a fall or a life vest if they could fall in the water – or both.
When did you start? And is it finished then?
We got moved out here in January of 2016 . first piece of equipment came in march 2016. We really got going about May of 16. Our contractual date is early November of this year. So we have a lot to do. And when you first come out of the ground, there’s a of activity – but maybe not a lot to show for it. And that’s kind o the nature of our business. There’s a lot of prep work . And then at one point you drive across and there’s a cantilever on the north side, or one span. And then there’s two. And a month later, there’s five. So things come together sometimes quickly. So there’s a lot of bridge to go; and there’s a lot of bridge that’s been built. But we’re done fall, November of this year.
That’s fast. like 2.5 years
That’s the tight schedule. That’s why we work in a couple places at the same time. And we have some detailed scheduling that keeps the whole orchestra moving properly. And we also demolish the old bridge, so we’ll use it for that as well. We’re gonna keep 1200 feet of the old bridge as a fishing pier, so it stays behind.
It’s like a restaurant. You can prep all day for five hours of service.
That’s just how some of these things take shape. Not all pieces take an equal amount of time. Sometimes the foundations take more time, and then what’s above it will go faster. We may be in the ground for a long time, driving piles, making the foundation, and then when you get out of a more difficult area it takes shape quicker.
How does has pile driving part changed?
That piece is pretty conventional. There might be eight pieces we modified on the job to account for different conditions. A lot of these guys on the job who can McGyver things pretty good. But we’re still driving pilings into the ground. Some things in construction haven’t changed that much. Segmental bridges – at least in the US – are relatively new. The first one was in Texas in 1973. So that’s 45 years.
Why not a suspension bridge?
That’s more for making long span bridges. Our spans our 350 feet, so a little miniature suspension wouldn’t make any sense. It’s expensive to build that small. So this fits our project. Golden Gate’s side spans are like 1000 feet – that’s still huge compared to us.
What’s the most rewarding part of doing this stuff?
Probably the integration with all the people. It sounds corny, but assembling a team from different backgrounds and different part so the country. All the men and women with different trades, skills and specialties. And at the end of the day you assemble a team and build something tangible. Something you can see that has longevity. The bridge design life here is 100 years. It’ll be around longer than we’ll be around. So it’s getting that team together to put something in the ground, and you can really be proud of what you built because it’s serving the community. It’s got function. And you get to see something for all the hard effort.
So is there a general feeling when you’re done? Is there sense of relief? Can you compare it to something?
If there’s a sense of any great relief – it’s the ribbon cutting. Not sure I can compare it to anything. It’s definitely a relief, because you get so focused on the finish line – and the finish line is getting the first car across. Of course, we’ll have been driving across for a while by then. But getting those first official cars across and turning it over to the DOT? That’s the finish line. I don’t know what to compare it to, but it definitely feels good. It has that sense of getting it turned over, and I’m not responsible anymore It’s a big relief, a big sense of accomplishment. Sometimes you get transferred out beforehand, to kick off another job, but you always get the chance go come back for the big celebration.
Is there a fight over who gets to cross first?
There can be. [laugh] Some of the old timers definitely like to be first across when we connect it. But it usually comes down to whoever’s in the right place at the right time. Nobody really lines up for it. But when we turn it over to the public, we’ve had bridges where people knew the set date and time and line up 12 hours early so he could be the first guy across. He was still behind somebody -a politician or someone else that’s part of the ceremony. But he was the first average citizen.
But even before the Governor, or whoever, there’s some average guy, a worker, going across.
Yeah, and it’s just an internal thing. But the way it’s built, guys north side are parking all over it already because it’s not that much space. But once it’s connected form one end to the other, we’ll see who goes.
It feels like a big contractor gig. You get the framers, then the plumbers trim guys – you just time it.
There’s guys in the field doing this stuff who have a particular set of skills – like Liam Neeson [laughs]. And they’re artisans in their own right. It’s just a larger scale. Then it’s breaking down these big pieces into more manageable pieces. But we’re all one team.
And you have a lot more clients. It’s like the DOT, the whole outer banks and then some.
Yeah. I guess so. [laughs]
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Darrell Collins is more than a history buff. He’s a history strongman. Able to crack open major milestones from our collective past, pick out the most important details, then squeeze it all back together into some pressurized gem of revelatory insight, always with a surprisingly personal connection.
A born-and-raised Roanoke Islander, the 62-year-old’s family tree includes members of the original Freedmen’s Colony — the Civil War’s first refuge for slaves on the run — and Pea Island surfmen, the all-black lifesaving crew that saved countless men and women. But Collins is best known for his work as a National Park Service historian at Wright Brothers Memorial. For nearly four decades, he brought to life the birth of aviation for thousands of visitors, earning awards such as North Carolina’s Order of the Longleaf Pine, the state’s highest honor. Not that he saw it coming.
“It was just a job at the beginning,” Collins says. “But the more I read, the more I fell in love with the story of the Wright Brothers. The characteristics of perseverance, determination, courage, and persistence. And the events set in motion that morning are never-ending. They will profoundly change the world until there’s no one else in this world. It’s still happening today.”
Even for Collins. While he retired last January, he still travels to airshows and expos around the country, giving presentations under the title, “A Legacy of Greatness.” In-between, as president of Pea Island Preservation Society, he promotes African American’s long-standing influence on Outer Banks life — including working diligently to ensure the new Pea Island interim bridge will be named after the legendary Richard B. Etheridge, the first and only black keeper to command a U.S. Life Serving Station. And as a long-time Manteo commissioner and Mayor Pro-Tem, Collins continually promotes preserving our long-standing traditions and environment for generations to come.
With the 114th First Flight celebration set for December 17 and Black History Month on the horizon, we sat down with Collins at Manteo’s historic Pea Island Cookhouse to discuss the role our past will play in the future — and how our present influences our take on the past. — Matt Walker
Ed. Note: What follows is a full-transcript of the edited interview that appeared in Issue 6.4 and took place in October of 2017
MILEPOST: You grew up here, correct?
DARRELL COLLINS: Yes. Born and raised here on the Outer Banks. My family’s been here since 1862. So, I’m a descendant of the Freedman’s Colony. My grandmother and her husband, Edna Wise and Frank Wise, their parents were actually members of the Freedman’s Colony.
Were you born a history buff by nature?
Well, I was a geology major — which is the history of the earth — but history was one of my favorite subjects in high school in college. I had a minor in history.
Do you think that was partially due to having all this in your family?
Probably so. My grandmother used to tell me all these stories. She lived to be 92 years old. And she would tell me stories of living in Bowsertown — and there’s Bowsertown Road right over there. And that’s where the family was raised. And she had nine sisters. And she would tell us stories of how they grew up. And she was an amazing woman. What she could do with her hands and her mind, [she could take nothing and make something out of it.] My father died when I was 5 years old. When Hurricane Donna hit the Outer Banks, he and three other Coast Guard men died that day just five miles from the house. He was crossing the little bridge on the causeway; their car got washed over. Back in those days, they didn’t have all the news we do. So, the eye of the storm came up the sound. And they were in the eye. They saw the sun shining, bird’s chirping, they thought they were safe to drive back to Norfolk. By the time they got to that bridge, all the water that had been washed out of the sound came back because the wind shifted back around, and washed their car over. So, I was raised by my mother and my grandmother.
So you grew up hearing stories of what it was like in the early 1900s. What would she tell you?
She mostly told family history — about her children. She had seven children. And one, her oldest daughter, died from drinking too much. Her oldest son, John Grant, was killed by a jealous woman, right here at this site. There used to be gyp joint her, Lucy’s Corner — like a place where you come and buy whiskey and beer and dance. Like a nightclub. Well, it used to be right here on this site. And he was shot and killed right here, by a jealous woman. And another son went off joyriding and got in a car wreck and his leg got messed up. And back then, there weren’t too many doctors around, so he got gangrene and septic shock and he died. Her husband, Frank Wise, lost his leg, too. Back in those days, people would leave the south and go up north to find employment. So his mother, left him here with a leg he was supposed to take care of it. And she forced him to go out and chop wood and wouldn’t buy him clothes and he got gangrene and they cut it off. So she would tell us all these family stories.
Do you think that helped cultivate your love of the past, because you had this personal connection — and because things were so different?
Yes. And as a kid you’re fascinated by these stories your grandmother tells you. And you’ll sit for hours and listen to these tales from back in the day. And her sisters would tell us stories too — about the Civil War or how Bowsertown was haunted — and how their grandfather was walking down the street and a Civil War soldier walked by. And he grinned at him, and his teeth was gold. And he turned around, and the soldier was gone [laughs]. So I’ve always loved a good mystery story, a scary story. [laughs] And we grew up with all that.
And those are the stories that catch your interest. Now was this during segregation, I assume. Was this gyp joint, like a segregation type of thing?
It was segregated here at that time in history. But there was another one over here called Leveda’s just down to the right of the cookhouse. It was there all during my childhood and as a young adult. When I was in the first grade I would stop there on my way to school and buy penny candy. It was also after hours place where people would come to dance and drink after 2 am when all the other places closed. And the whites would come. Because after two in the morning you couldn’t buy liquor. But she was a bootlegger. It was a party joint. And the whites would come and three or four o’clock in the morning.
Well, if you look at the history of jazz, a lot of desegregation happened that way. Everyone loves a party, I guess. So, it must’ve been significantly different from when you grew up in Manteo 50 years ago.
Once the Union captured Roanoke Island in February of 1862, word spread across the sound to mainland North Carolina that runaway slaves would find safe haven if they crossed the creek to Roanoke Island. And that’s when slaves started to come to Roanoke Island. At one time, there was over 3500 freedmen that came to Roanoke Island. And they formed the Freedmen’s Bureau, which was a department of the United States Government, and they were in charge of the all the Freedmen Colonies. So, this island has always been a safe haven for African Americans. Even during the Jim Crow era. And they had slaves on Roanoke Island, but it wasn’t as bad — slavery’s always bad. Slavery is slavery. The first thing a slave wants is freedom. But it wasn’t as bad as say further south in Georgia and South Carolina and all that. I don’t know if it had to do with the environment. The Outer Banks was a hard place to live; people scratched and clawed just to survive, and I think that played a part in how people treated each other.
It’s the same today, I’d argue: people sacrifice to live here, and that adversity bonds people together. So, is this all history you picked up before you went to the Park Service, or stuff you picked up since?
It was kind of a mix. My mother was very into preserving history — African American history, but also the history of Roanoke Island. So my mother [Dellerva Collins] was a commissioner of the town of Manteo for 26 years, from 1979 until she died in 2005. She was very active in the community. She loved to help people from the community with her problems.
When you were coming up in school, was there a focus on the history of the Outer Banks? You had to get the Wright Brothers.
The main history was the Wright Brothers and the Lost Colony because you were born and raised, right here. I never thought I would work there and become the historian; I worked there almost 40 years. I started there in 1977 and retired this past January. I became a ranger just out of college. But the Wright Brothers history changed the world. And coming from an odd place like the Outer Banks, for something to impact the world the way they did is almost unbelievable. [laughs]
We have a couple of big events for a tiny area. The first failed English settlement and the birth of controlled flight.
The birth of our nation started here.
Why do you think that is?
A lot of people don’t believe in fate, but I think fate a had a lot to do with it. The English could’ve come farther north, which was the Chesapeake Bay, which was where Jamestown ended up. And that was the idea: deeper waters for ships to transfer to the bays. There was a sequence of events that led up to the discovery of Roanoke Island. Because English and Spain were at war so they needed a place to hide away from the Spanish. So Roanoke Island was a place they could hide; and that’s one of the reasons they chose Roanoke Island. Then the friendly Indians who lived here, probably clinched it for them. Until everything disintegrated when you start to bring in things like greed and feelings of superiority. And English were small, and the Indians were over six feet tall. [laughs]
So I’m sure there was some fear involved in there, too.
But it failed. And Jamestown came along 22 years after.
I do feel like there’s a bit of magic that draws people here. Whether or not that’s being superstitious…
I was just contacted by National Geographic. They’re doing a story about trying to trace the descendants of the Lost Colony. And their theory is that the Colony intermixed with the native culture and was absorbed by the native American culture. That’s why in Lumberton you have blue-eyed blonde Indians. But they’re doing a story on this man here — Joseph Hall Berry — who think was maybe… our ancestors, on my father’s side of the family, has Native American traits. And this man right here, our great grandfather, Joseph Hall Berry, was the man who was the first into the United States Lifesaving Service. Twenty-one of his descendants followed in his footsteps. So our family — the Berry family, the Collins family — have almost 400 years of combined service, from the Lifesaving Service up to the Coast Guard. So National Geographic is doing a story and they think he might be part of the English and the Native Americans on Roanoke Island.
Well, that’s three different cultures right there. So, when you were coming up in school, did they talk about the lifesaving history at all?
No. I didn’t hear black history until I went to college in the late 70s. But I went to two black colleges — Norfolk State University and Elizabeth City State University.
So, in high school, were you in class thinking: ‘why is nobody talking about my great grandfather?”
Well, you know how it is when you’re young, you’ve got other things on your mind. For some reason, young people aren’t really into history. It seems like when you get older, you get more into history and how history changed America — changed the world. When you’re young, you don’t think about history. You live in that moment. [laughs]
When you finally did hear black history, were you like, “Hold on professor, I can tell some stories.” Was there an awakening of sorts?
In college, you had certain classes and you’d do reports on personal history, so I’d talk about the Freedmen Colony or the Native Americans on Roanoke Island. But, other than that, it’s local history.
I think everyone has this sort of sense of personal history — if you’re lucky. I’m sure there are people who have zero idea of what their grandparents or great grand parents did. But I know my great-grandfather was Asst. Post Master General under FDR and wrote speeches for him. But my great-grandmother said she was relate to Pocahontas, too. So history gets clouded pretty fast.
And that’s everywhere, too. Even the Wright Brothers story has misconceptions. The famous photograph was taken by John Daniels. And there was another man somewhere up north named John Daniels. And his whole life he told his family he took that picture. So when he died, the family found out it wasn’t true. And they realized for many, many years he fabricated the story. Why? [laughs] I don’t know. But people always want to be part of history. But the misconceptions of history are everywhere. Never let the facts stand in the way of a good story.
And they say, history was written by the victors.
Certainly with the history of the Native Americans.
And it can change real fast: did Columbus come here first. Or did the Vikings com here first. And what is it now: Connecticut says one of their citizens flew first.
Well, everybody wants to be first. [laughs]
So you spent 40 years focusing on the Wright Brothers. Were you a fan going in?
It was just a job at the beginning. The more I read, the more I fell in love with the story of the Wright Brothers. The characteristics of the Wright Brothers: perseverance, determination, courage, persistence. All that was part of what made their first flight a reality.
It’s hard to find a moment that’s that tangible – and had so much impact so quickly. The amount of time that transpired between 1903 and 1969 moon landing. That’s a short period of time.
The most unique thing about that is that the events set in motion that morning, that first flight, are never-ending. It’s still happening today. The events that happened that morning will profoundly change the world until there’s no one else in this world.
That’s true. It’s like a ripple effect. When you read David McCullough’s book, you realize how it wasn’t immediate. There was a period of several years where people didn’t believe it happened and they had to prove it to the world. Going to Europe and showing different countries. And multiple people were trying at the same time…
Oh, people all over the world were trying. And to have it happen in such an isolated area, in a place unknown to the world. In 1900, Kitty Hawk was almost the end of the world. the landscape was almost nothing but sand. It’s kind of ironic that it almost looks like the moon landscape, too. [laughs] It’s kind of…. [sighs] I don’t know. People don’t believe in fate and destiny and all that, but I think the Wrights were destined to do what they did. They were born at the right time in history. And curiosity is one of the reasons they solved the problem of flight. They were born and raised up in a family setting that encouraged them to pursue whatever aroused their curiosity. Even to the point they didn’t have to go to school; if had something they were interested in something they could stay at home and work on it. The mother and father encouraged the children to be independent thinkers. Not to go with the flow.
Very much so.
And that’s the hardest thing for a college professor in college. You’ve got all these standards now. And you want kids to think out and beyond those standards; to see the other way. You’ve been doing it this way for so many years, is there another way?
And when you think about the Lost Colony and the Wright Brothers, both are tales of pioneering. Pioneering flight, pioneering a country. Even the Freedmen Colony required people to take a risk and do something they’d never done. It’s not a safe route.
And these are the fundamentals of life. And the reason why they came from Europe, is they wanted freedom: either religious or political freedom. Which is a fundamental belief of any individual. People don’t want to be slaves. The first thing a slave wants is to be free. To think independently. To live the way that you want to live. The Wright Brothers invention is a fundamental thing, because flight has always been here. The mechanism of flight was here 100 years before the Wrights were born. But somebody had to discover those principles and put them all together to make it a reality. That’s what the Wrights did. So how many other things in this world are already in place? The discovery of a cure for cancer — or a discovery to make peace in this world — it may already be here. [laughs]
You have to have the right combo of all these factors: the right people, the right place, the right time. And you also have to know where you’ve been to know where you’re going. And not make the same mistakes.
One of my heroes, Neil Armstrong, one of his quotes was, “History is like a mirror and it can only look back. But there is great value in pausing to look back. Because only with a great appreciation of where we have been, can we ever hope to understand where we are headed.”
Do you think some of that awareness has been lost nowadays?
Yes. Especially with the climate of America now. But it will straighten out; it goes in cycles.
I think technology plays an interesting role, too. People are so distracted and obsessed with what’s happening right this second — and possibly with themselves right this second. And then misinformation or assumptions can take hold. I’m just as guilty. I was flabbergasted that our capital is Raleigh, NC and Sir Walter Raleigh never came here.
You know what happened to him, don’t you?
The queen beheaded him right?
The queen’s brother beheaded him. But beheading in those days was only for royalty. The rest of ‘em were drawn-and-quartered! [laughs] but his wife kept his head for many, many years. Probably kept it on the mantel. [laughs]
But stories like that keep your attention. That’s what gets people interested. But I think history also gets sanitized at times, too.
Well, I’m president of the Pea Island Preservation Society, which runs this place here. And we have been presenting, since April, a program called “Freedmen, Surfmen, Heroes.” And we have myself, my cousin – the boathouse is named after her father, Herbert Collins, who was the last surfman stationed at Pea Island, when this station closed in 1947. He closed the door and locked it with a key. And he spent 34 years in the Coast Guard. And then we have two costumed interpreters — one dressed as a keeper; the other in a period piece. And we tell the story of unity as it related to the Pea Island crew. Because when wrecks occurred on the Outer Banks, more than once station would come to that wreck. So these men worked right beside the other white crews performing rescues. They respected each other. They learned from each other. And they worked in harmony with each other. So our program talks about racism. It talks about slavery. It also talks about unity — blacks and whites working together. And we presented that program all summer at the aquarium. And with mixed emotions, too, now. We had people walk out of the program because they couldn’t take it.
Really!? That’s hard to imagine.
Oh yeah. But most people love it. We involved the kids in the audience. And it’s a really powerful presentation.
Have you taken it to schools at all?
We took it to once school in April, Kitty Hawk Elementary. Then we also got the kids to writhe the governor about naming the bridge after Richard B. Etheridge. And last week I gave a presentation to the board of the directors of the North Carolina DOT, when they read the resolution to name the bridge after Richard Etheridge, a 15-minute presentation about the life and times of Richard Etheridge.
That’s interesting about history: because you hear about the resistance to that all-black crew, but you don’t hear about the resolution.
Well, once he took over, the station burned to the ground.
Do you think it was arson?
It had to be. Because when he came in charge of the crew, all the white crewmen walked away. And that’s how he ended up with an all-black crew. And during that program, he we ask< “Why do you think that station burned down?” And most of the time kids jump in! They say, “They didn’t like it” or “they were prejudiced” or whatever. And these are white kids, now. [laughs] But he didn’t become a keeper — he was the only black keeper in the whole service. So, you know he had to have other white people who were behind him. He had superintendents, he had district men who were in charge of the lifesaving station – white men – who recommended him. And they said stuff like, “He was the best surfman on the coast, white or black.” It doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Back in those days, you had to have other people who saw your potential and believed in what you had accomplished at that time.
These are stories that are now being told now – at least locally. Do you think black history gets more attention now.
I think that’s more local. There’s been a few documentaries. But it’s a story that needed to be told. Especially in this day and time. And this unity thing we do, as far as blacks and whites working together for a common cause, I think that’s going to have to happen in America here: working together for a common cause. And hopefully it’s not a war. And the war we talk about these days, it’s nothing to be taken light.
Well, it’s hard to hate somebody who you work with side-by-side. A lot of it’s fear of the other.
And over time, it will change. I think it will.
But it does take time. And then the other thing is people are impatient. It’s almost like two opposing forces. What’s your take on the statues then. That Charlottesville situation is almost impossible to comprehend. I see both sides of the argument to some degree. I understand the argument of “Why pay tribute to someone who’s on the wrong side of history?” but I also see people who say, ‘you can’t erase history.”
Well, you can’t erase history. And to a certain degree, you shouldn’t. But I think it’s the context of how these statues were put in. Most were put in during the Jim Crow era of total racism in America against blacks. That’s when most of these monuments were put up to honor Civil War soldiers. So, I think that’s the issue. But you shouldn’t want to erase history. That should be a symbol of America that we never want to return to. So that symbol should be there. Just not everywhere. Maybe one or tow. But its’ a symbol of how America was. And you can’t change history now. You can’. But what was happening in America at the time those statues were put up. That’s the issue.
Some people probably don’t realize how bad it was. It’s only been 100 years. But I bet a lot of people don’t realize how bad it was in 1960-something.
And ’64 was when the Civil Rights Act was ratified in America. So I started with the federal government in 1977. And I remember a few things. I remember I had a government car and I was somewhere in Virginia getting gas. And this black man came up to me and said, “You know, ten years ago, you wouldn’t never have this job.” And that makes you want to do better everywhere. And when you work at the Wright Brothers memorial, you have more than 500,000 visitors per year. And I would say maybe 5% were black. So, the majority are not. I remember earlier in my career, I would give the talk in the flight room where the airplane is. So, you give the talk in the 70s, and the place is filled with 250 white people, and a black man comes in [laughs] — and you could look at their faces and tell who was with you and who wasn’t. I’m serious! [laughs] I had one night I was closing the gate there, and I guy came up to me and said, “You look just like Sammy Davis Jr.” [laughs] Do I look like Sammy Davis Jr.?! So, it was there in the 70s. But it got better, as time went on.
But it’s just like the revolution didn’t happen and everything changed, the Civil Rights Act didn’t happen and everything changed. But if you’re not impacted by it, it’s hard to tell. And it’s hard to see it get worse.
We still have a long way to go. It’ll take time.
Are we lucky here in terms of Civil Rights history and Civil War history? It feels like we don’t have same types of moments or long term oppression to become issues.
Well, there was a big push to get the Virginia Dare bridge named after Richard Etheridge. That was kind of disappointing.
It is ironic that Virginia Dare is basically the first anchor baby. And it does feel like the rules change or perceptions change. But a lot of history is hypocritical. But I guess it all depends on the perspective of the person telling it.
Even battles in the civil war. You can see the differences in what people say. Richard Etheridge? was a sergeant in the 2nd Colored troop of the 36th regiment of North Carolina. And a regiment at full strength is over 1000 men. So imagine 1000 black men with guns, dressed in their Union blue uniforms. And one of the first battles they proved themselves was the battle of New Market Heights, which was eight-and-a-half miles southeast of Richmond. And the heights were a fortified high ground that was protecting that sector of Richmond. Twice before they tried to capture the heights and failed, costing the death 1000 men. But on September 29, 1864, 41,000 Union troops were poised to capture the Heights that day. It was determined that the colored troops would lead the charge. There were 6 regiments of black troops – 6000 black men. Right at the beginning more than 1000 were killed. Half that many were wounded. But they captured the Heights that day. And the orders that were given before they did this were, “Do not surrender and do not be captured.’ Because when whites were captured or surrendered, they were put in prison camps. The blacks – and even the white officers who commanded the black units — they were executed right on site. That was a rule, a law passed by the confederate government.
So, those were direct orders…
And right off the bat, all the white officers were killed, because they were on the front lines. So the sergeants would take up command. So, they captured the Heights that day and opened the road to Richmond. During the Civil War, there were over 1500 Medal of Honor awarded to Union Soldiers. Sixteen went to colored troops. Fourteen were awarded during the Battle of New Market Heights. So, that give you an example of how important that battle was. But, say, a southerner who’s into Confederate history, he tells it completely differently. He’ll say the Confederacy retreated — he’ll say they let them take it.
So occasionally losers get to write history, too.
So that’s an example of people telling a history that suits themselves – or whatever agenda they might have.
I guess people are predisposed to thinking better about themselves. Maybe that’s why people get riled up, because they’re being undermined. And I don’t have a dog in the Civil War fight, but to me, the situation in Charlottesville is troubling because of the emotions it stirs. That blanket hatred of “the other.”
Yeah, I don’t know who could sympathize with Hitler or a Nazi. I mean, the Greatest Generation of Americans fought that war. They sacrificed their lives to stop that — to defend America against that. To see it come back up again, what the hell? How could any world War II veteran stomach that?
Or anyone who has a sense of history. To me, a known fact would be “World War II, we fought the Nazis.” But then again, we also had segregated troops and Japanese Internment camps. So I don’t think anyone has squeaky clean hands. So how do you navigate those issues when you know there’s a gray area?
The best way to tell history is as true as you know it. But you need to know a lot about your subject in order to tell it truthfully.
I was anthropology minor. You’d read ethnographies and one of the rules is you don’t judge a culture by your values. I think it’s hard to find a perfect culture in history.
No. Nowhere.
So, form a Civil Rights perspective, how does Manteo fare?
Well, I’ve always had friends of different colors. Some of my best friends are my high school classmates, most are white. And to this day we interact with each other, and are very had a respectful of each other. I think probably because we’ve grown up together, worked together, played together, and mourned together, the death of our classmates and sisters and brothers.
Do you think the community is more diverse?
Oh yes. Manteo’’ completely changed. The diversity of Dare County is completey changed. We’ve seen an influx of Latinos now, which I think is good. And diversity will keep changing as time goes on.
I wish there was more diversity on these town boards. I’ll sit down sometimes and go, “What year is this?” I will say that women seem better represented. Not for Dare County right now, but many towns are…
Manteo has myself and three ladies on the board. So that’s pretty diverse. But the municipality of Manteo is completely different from any other town on the Outer Banks. Most of the people on our board are born and raised in Mantep. So we have a personal stake in what happens here. And we really have a deep down caring for preserving our history and traditions in Manteo. And I feel that reflects on the board.
I’d agree. That “Mayberry” reputation happens for a reason. And it’s probably the best example of preservation.
And we do a lot to try and preserve our environment, too. Our stormwater project, we’re trying to clean up the bay. We’re trying to filter the water before it goes into the bay. One of our main goals is to try to restore Shallowbag Bay to the point where it will sustain shellfish again. We have a big oyster project we do, we put oyster shells along the marsh area. We are very into preservation of history but also our natural resources.
So, as our community grows, what doest that mean moving forward. We probably have more ‘natives’ born here than ever, but they’re being born into a starkly different community. How do we maintain those values when we get father and far from the root source?
Hopefully this is where history will take its course. When people look back to see what previous leaders have done to preserve history to preserve the environment, I think they can look back and see where we were trying go. So history we make today, will be the history that determine the future — for the county as well as Manteo.
I guess that’s where this buildings come into play. Or the Richard Etheridge bridge.
Yes. These are the places that hopefully arouse some curiosity for people to learn more about history: Why is this bridge named after Richard Etheridge? Or who is Richard Etheridge? Someone might ask that question and look into it. And if we eventually clean up Shallowbag Bay and bring back oystering and other stuff like that, that’s good for everybody. And I think the younger generation are environmentally aware anyway. Even though the political climate is changing, this is a government of the people and by the people.
<b<so, i=”” do=”” think=”” we’re=”” lucky=”” in=”” terms=”” of=”” civil=”” war=”” history.=”” we=”” don’t=”” have=”” charles=”” lindbergh,=”” who=”” had=”” nazi=”” tendencies.=”” but=”” why=”” does=”” blackbeard=”” get=”” away=”” with=”” it?=”” he=”” was=”” pirate,=”” possibly=”” a=”” murderer.=”” is=”” it=”” because=”” so=”” long=”” ago=”” it’s=”” hard=”” to=”” see=”” as=”” reality?=”” or=”” mythical=”” story?<=”” b=””>
I think Blackbeard is just a good campfire tale to scare kids or whatever. When he died, that was the end of piracy in America. By that time, all the other pirates were killed or out of business. So it’s an era of American history. But it makes a good tale. And it happened. You can’t change it. Kids are inspired by stories like that. Even though they were criminals. [laughs]</b<so,>
Well, kids do love violence — gunslingers and everything else. But maybe you’re right. The most engaging history involves some sense of the grand. Saving Lives. Lost colonies. Flight. Freedom.
Those are the stories that make up the world. And the world’s a dangerous place. And people should be aware of that. There are places you don’t want to go. There are people you don’t want to associate with.
Well, we are lucky. Your grandmother told stories of people getting shot and losing legs. We’ve gotten really accustomed to the idea as safety as a right. And history is one place where danger still lives.
And that’s one of its draws, too. There’s always excitement. You know the outcome because it’s history. [laughs] You know what happened at the end – they all died or they all disappeared. It’s how it happened that’s exciting.
It makes us sound tame. Which is kind of depressing. What will they say about us 100 years from now? Will it still be Wright Brothers, Lost Colony, Blackbeard, etc. Or will we have something else to offer?
Well, history’s being made every day, so there will be other things to talk about. I believe some of the events that occurred, not only in Charlottesville but elsewhere, will be part of told history as well.
Well, hopefully it comes out the right way.
I don’t know who’s writing history down, hopefully somebody is [laughs] But we have all the documentary stuff now — the news and such — that’ historically preserved.
It’s almost too much.
you have instant news now. Wihtin an hour it’s covered. And it ‘shappening so much, yo don’t have time to absorb and process it. And it changes with the push of a button.
So, you retired. What now?
Well, I have a business called ALOG – A Legacy of Greatness. You can check out the website A Legacy of Greatness. Com. I still tell the story of the Wright Brothers. Since I retired I’ve had four different speaking engagements around the country. A week after I retired I went to Sebring, Florida for the Sports Aviation Expo. Light sports aviation is a movement all over the world. These are light sport aircraft, where the restriction are a lot different from a regular pilot’s license. They have a week -long celebration. Then I went to Chicago and gave a presentation for an air club up there. The Billy Mitchell. Then I was in Cedar Rapids Iowa in June – that’s where the Wright Bros were kids at 7 and 11 years old. And that’s where they got the toy flying machine their father bought at the Iowa State Fair that inspired them. And they referred to that toy all though their life. That’s how the seed of flight was planted. And then I went to OshKosh, which is home to the biggest airshow in the world. A weeklong event; 18,000 airplanes on the ground. So, I was giving programs therefor 400-500 people at a time.
Are you a pilot?
I’m not a pilot. But I talk to a lot of people who are, and I’m very interested in their stories.
Do the Wright Brothers have any skeletons in their closet? History does seem to paint people in stark terms: good and evil. But it’s not always that case. Was one of ‘em a horrible drunk or anything?Guess that just goes to show what you were saying about fate. If someone had gone in and looked at the document, what would that have done?
They would’ve ended up in court probably – that’ what happened to them anyway. But when people ask why they never married, one of the reasons was they had two older brothers who had four kids each. And they saw how hard life was for them trying to support their families. And another reason is they were geniuses.
And they were super close. And how much time and energy they spent obsessing on flight, they didn’t have tie for a family. They might not have done it. How could they spend so much time on the Outer Banks with a family at home? The other irony is that if they were gay, even 20 years ago that might have been something ot be ashamed of. Now, they’d be heroes to a whole community.
Yes. And then you have another segment that asks if they were dyslexic or had some type of autism — which they might have. But it would’ve been a highly functioning form of autism.
Well, people look at history and hope to see themselves.
That’s it. A woman who wrote a book on that subject, her child had autism. She was looking for something in history to hold on to and to understand what was going on with her child.
Goes back to that mirror quote of Armstrong’s: people want to see themselves. And if they don’t, they may change the picture.
Yes, it is. Yes, they will. [laughs]
______________________________________________________________________________________
On the Outer Banks, everyone’s a weather expert. Or at least they think they are. Salty captains spit data on sea surface temps and ancient storms. Tropical Young Turks track systems ten days in advance. Old wives’ tales fill the gaps, predicting winter freezes by squirrel activity and wooly worms. And yet, many of these lifelong fanatics are just as likely to dismiss decades of data, seeing scientists as pushy outsiders in lab coats, full of vague predictions but no real answers. The irony? Some of those scientists live right here in Dare County.
Between Duck’s Army Corps of Engineers Field Research Facility and Skyco’s Coastal Scientist Institute, dozens of coastal researchers pass through, spending summers, semesters and decades diligently documenting our dynamic coastline, running the models and sharing the results with the world. Four years ago, the planet’s leading private wave forecaster, California-based Surfline.com, opened a Nags Head office, adding three full-time meteorologists to the mix. And while all of our professional expert agree that there’s no better place to study the weather, they’re also the first to say that nobody can ever fully understands every process. In fact, that’s their job: to constantly question every finding.
“Some people see not having a decisive answer as not being committal,” says Dr. Reide Corbett, a CSI marine chemist. “But you may not have a definitive conclusion. Until you have additional data the best answer is, ‘Maybe.’ And people hate to hear “maybe.”
Yet, people love to offer their own unverified observations. Whether it’s naming a short-term coastal formation, “Shelly Island.” (It’s really more of a giant sandbar.) Or blaming it on beach nourishment. (Not likely.) Or linking it to climate change. (Wrong again.) Throw in some social media, political biases, and the occasional bad model run, and it’s easy to see how people’s trust in science can erode — even as their own neighbors are doing real research with global impacts.
We sat down with Dr. Corbett, FRF research oceanographer Dr. Katherine Brodie, and Surfline meteorologist Mark Willis to discuss what makes the Outer Banks such a hotbed for data — and debate. And to find out how we can all help advance scientific discussion in a modern climate where everyone’s a weatherman — and nobody’s perfect. — Matt Walker
MILEPOST: The Outer Banks has a pretty strong lineage of scientific study. The Park Service has letters from 1870s that are the precursor to the National Weather Service. Why here? And do we rate on the world stage of research?
MARK WILLIS: If you’re looking at me, from an operational standpoint, it sticks out. So, it’s exposed to everything you can imagine. And as a meteorologist, we get every kind of weather you can imagine, from snow storms to nor’easters to hurricanes. It’s kind of a meteorologist’s dream come true: it’s challenging. It’s not Southern California where you get the same winds every day. Or Central America where you get this diurnal wind pattern that’s easy to predict. It keeps you on your toes. So just being exposed and the variety and the different challenges keep it exciting for weather nerds.
KATE BRODIE: I agree. From a scientist’s perspective, you like to go where the signal is large and you know you’re going to get good data. And we can pretty much guarantee every fall we’ll have some set of tropical systems come through and every winter we’re going to get a whole big string of nor’easters. And so if you want to study wave impacts on the beach, it’s a great place to be from that standpoint. I think the all facilities associated with all of the institutes on the Outer Banks are great. The history of doing research in the surf zone here [at the FRF] — it’s our 40th anniversary — we’ve got the infrastructure and the facilities and the knowledge and the equipment to put stuff in the surf zone and help ensure you can get it back and get good data. We have scientists from Woods Hole Oceanographic who come here every fall, and have been doing so since the place opened, because they know what they can get. And they know they can keep building on the same basic research principles and not have to worry if they’re going to get the right conditions.
REIDE CORBETT: You see, I would say there’s plusses and minuses. What’s good about it is the location — location, location, location, right? — it sticks out, it’s the closest point to the Gulf Stream, almost, depends on where it is in Florida. It’s extremely energetic. It has currents coming from two different directions. But because it is so energetic, it’s a struggle to keep instruments working in the system, and things like that. And those dynamics are what brought some of the scientists here. And as the scientists are here, more scientists want to be here. But it’s also challenging because it’s pretty energetic and out of the way, so it’s hard to get scientists her because it’s hard to be here. Just finding a place for the summer can be hard. But the coastal dynamics happen on time scales on anywhere from minutes to months to years, and so I think that poses a challenge of whether you can keep scientists here. So that’s the challenge of this area. But if you’re interested in coastal dynamics, we live in a perfect lab.
Remoteness has always been the blessing and curse — for everyone really. Woods Hole has Boston. It has an airport.
RC: So, to take it even broader than that: we’ve got this incredible dynamic system on the front side but we also have the second largest estuarine system on the back side. And being able to study the exchange between the two — with FRF getting into the research, with CSI sitting on the estuary — it opens up some additional doors for better monitoring and understanding the connection between the two.
Just like kiteboarders say: we have the sound and the ocean.
KB: [laughs]Exactly! Scientists say the same thing. We have both environments less than a kilometer apart in some places.
So you brought up instruments. One of the funny entries in the old log, the observers writes about the arms being blown off his anemometer mid-hurricane. And he sends his assistant out to fix it. Is it a constant issue maintaining equipment?
KB: We still do that! When people evacuate, we stay here and I have it so I can check all the gauges on my phone. And if I see something go down, I am up here no matter what the conditions are and we’re out there fixing it. Because that’s the data set we live for. We were on the pier during Hermine and there were hurricane gusts. The whole thing was shaking.
MW: Gosh. For us it’s cams. After every storm, cams go down….
RC: I was gonna say something… [laughs]
MW: Yeah, they’re hard to maintain, especially 360 of them around the world. And it’s not just weather. With First Street, we can only get in between 2 and 3pm on Saturday because of the rental company. [laughs] But you bring up the anemometer. When I worked at the Morehead Weather Service office, they still call Alligator River Bridge to get wind reports. As digital as the world we live in, they call, and ask “what’s the wind like?” and they look at the Davis Weather Instrument sitting right there — it reminds you of how somethings haven’t changed that much.
Well it goes back to the whole reliability thing. One of the bigger issues. Weather’s tougher than other issues. Neil DeGrasse Tyson’s a hero, but there’s no one on Mars to go “I’ve been here for six generations…” Is there another science, with the exception of gravity, where the average person has a) an opinion and can push back?
MW: Well, you have to have thick skin. And now everyone is a meteorologist, because of social media. So they see we weather chart 350 hours out that has something cool. So they post it and get likes, and we get blamed for it. [laughs].
RC: But I think we’re probably seeing this in most disciplines. Because of the digital age, anyone can become an expert – or think they’ve become an expert – because they can google it. Whether it’s weather, broader climate, sea level rise – there’s all this interesting info out there. Whether it’s based in fact, we can continue to argue, but there’s so much of this information out there, whether they’re actually observing it or reading facts — or false facts – online, they all think they’re experts. So it creates a challenge for making sure the broader public has the correct information. The best science. Because they feel like they’ve getting the best science in whatever blurb they read.
KB: And it’s really the difference between what your gut or intuition is telling you and what the data is telling you. And you can influence your gut and intuition really quickly. Marketing people have been taking advantage of that forever. And when you plot these longer time series and thing like that and get the data, you’re like, “this is different than what my intuition was saying.’ And that’s the scientific process. That’s’ the part we get to do. But it’s not he part that everyone else is doing. But! On the flip side, one of the cool parts is, there are efforts within the scientific community to make use of citizen science. And with all these people taking pictures and making observations, how can we use that in your own research. And that’s’ cool: because it’s scientists saying, “how can we take advantage of this digital age?” this new information. And you have to be careful with sources and quality control, for sure, but that’s the flip side.
RC: Weather Underground, right?
MW: Weather Underground and then Mping. The[ NOAA] National Severe Storms Laboratory has a system where anyone can go onto this interface and submit precipitation type. And it’s actually incredible. It’s a great way to see where the rain snow line is. Or if you’ve got mixed precipitation, and it has a great map interface…
So, I could be saying it’s raining here, and two blocks away someone says it’s snowing, and this documents it.
MW: Yes. And to me it’s the best use of crowdsource data I’ve ever seen. It’s helpful to the scientific community. That’s positive. But the other side, our biggest challenge is dealing with so called experts on social media. Because, for us, there are athletes with huge audiences. And they’ll post a Surfline chart that we don’t want them to post. It’s a computer model that’s working way far out and nobody’s verified.
KB: and no matter how many disclaimers you put on it, it doesn’t’ matter. [laughs[
MW: And no matter what our forecast says, if Kelly or whoever posts something 240 hours that has a hurricane that looks like it’s going to produce a big swell. And we’re saying, “No! It’s not gonna happen.” But we still get blamed. So it’s a challenge.
So you all grew up at least near the coast. Is that normal? If you’re a lava guy , did you grow up on Hawaii? And how does it impact your research and work?
RC: That’s an interesting question. I think it would be hard to brush that stroke so wide. Stan Riggs is a perfect example. He grew up in Montana.
KB: we have a guy here, Pat, who grew up in Minnesota and is a great coastal scientist. I guess I can say, for myself, I was always drawn back to the coast. I grew up in Massachusetts and we had a little town beach, this little narrow barrier of sand. And it would always break through during hurricanes and nor’easters. And that was always my dad’s thing to do: the eye would come over and get calm and we’d drive out to the beach so he could go see it. Did that influence the direction my career took? Maybe. I think we all love what we do which is study the coast. And the best way to study the coast is to live and be at the coast and see it every day.
RC: Yeah, it certainly influenced the direction in the work that I’ve done. When I came back to North Carolina the first project I had funded, I set up a site behind my old house and that’s where I was coring. And that’s what brought me back. And a lot of my early work was on the Neuse River where I grew up sailing and swimming and doing everything. So it guided some of my work early on. And my love for the coast started early and that’s clearly driven a lot work I’ve done. And why I’ve stayed so close. And it’s a lot easier I if you live in the environment, if you’re surrounded by the environment, it’s a lot easier to study it. You can just go down and check your instruments. But from a more social science point of view, especially with this community out here that’s so engaged, they can sometimes have a chip on their shoulder when someone from outside comes in and starts telling them what’s changing on this island. I start a lot of my talks out here with, “I live in Kill Devil Hills. What happens here matters to me.” I think that helps with relating with an audience when they don’t want someone coming in and saying, “You shouldn’t lie on this pile of sand.’ Not that I’ve ever said that —, because I live on this pile of sand. But it does make a difference when you’re trying to present your science out here.
I’m sure you have the same experience. In surfing, a poseur’s the worst you can be. I’m assuming a meteorological poseur is even worse.
MW:I have some unique perspective on this because we just hired a new junior forecaster. And we had like 400 applicants. All meteorologists. And I would say 80% of them were severe weather buffs from Oklahoma or the mid-west. And there’s a huge population of weather people out there who are very, very smart. But they got into it for tornados and thunder storms. And honestly, it was hard to even consider them. But you have much smaller pool of people who are passionate about the ocean and have a little bit of a marine and coastal background to combine with the academic background. And that’s who we end up looking at. But everyone on the Surfline team surfs. And you need that part of it to tie everything together from an academic to a recreational standpoint.
KB:Well it makes a lot of sense. Part of our organization is based down at our lab in Vicksburg Mississippi. And there’s a lot of coastal engineers are down there. Some of our best, coastal numerical modelers running the wave models, running our morphology evolution models, are down in Vicksburg. And I love getting them up here for a week and throwing them in the field. Especially in the fall when we’re doing big experiments nd getting some of our bigger waves. And for some of them, living their life inside a computer predicting all these processes, they’ve never experience in real life. And it’s eye-opening.
MW: I found that in the Weather Service. Marine forecasting in the weather service, you have all these weather buffs and you put ‘em on the marine desk and it’s like “What’s this wave period thing?” [laughs]but when you grow up around it and you’re in the water it helps.
Well, there are people in surf forecasting who are laymen anyway. Sean Collins was a layman. That’s different. I doubt anyone at the Army Corps went, “I’m just really into coastal engineering.”
KB: But some of our best technicians here, who are programming the instruments and designing the mounts we deploy in the surf zone, they don’t have masters and PhDs in science. We hired them because they have experience working in the surf zone. So there is a little bit of that.
Well, there is this friction. Especially here, where local fishermen or laymen say, “I don’t want some egghead in some desk telling me what’s up, I’m out there living it.” But not every scientist is in a desk. And the guy at the desk can be looking at data from across the planet and tell you things you never knew. So I’d argue you want to listen to both. The guy who’s studying white sharks in the Farallon Islands might be just as informed as the abalone diver. They’re not mutually exclusive. That divide does a disservice.
RC: Just last weekend, I happened to be listing to Marty’s show on 104 and one of their guests said that exact line. He brought up all the sharks that are taking a lot of their tuna. And he said, “Some needlehead scientist shouldn’t tell me what to do.”
So how informed is our community? I’ve lived in few places where the Weather Channel is require viewing. Are we more aware? Less aware? Do we just think we’re aware?
KB: I’ve always had really positive experiences interacting with most people in the community. Mostly people are really inquisitive. They want to know. They want to understand better, “Why does the beach look like this today and this the next day?” I personally haven’t had any antagonistic responses to the research we’re doing. So maybe I‘m lucky in that regard. I gave a talk at Waverider’s — the Green Drinks group – and that may be a more receptive crowd, but there were 65 people in attendance and everyone was super interested in wanting to understand he processes going on. So I thought that was really cool to see that level of engagement.
RC: I think that’s true for the most part. This community is different than most. It is very engaged. They want the information. Nags Head in particular is extremely progressive and they really want the scientific data to consider and include in their management plans.
KB: Yes. we’ve had a great working relationship with one of CSI’s grad students working with the town with the some of the research we’ve been doing. Ian’s been using some of our equipment to make measurements of how the dune’s evolving near where the beach nourishment area is north of Jennette’s. And the town is really excited to see the results and assimilate that info as quick as we can ‘what can we do better?’
I’m not necessarily pro-nourishment, but I’ll give Nags Head credit for doing it the right way. Let’s find matching sand. Let’s not talk hardened structures.
RC: And I would contrast that with 2010’s sea level rise report and that experience I had. I was on that original panel that wrote the first draft. And I was called names publicly at meetings. And Dare County was part of the coalition fighting that report — though they were fighting what the report might impose, not so much the science. But I think that’s a real frustration aspect of being a scientist, trying to do the work, there’s a disconnect sometimes between what we’re trying to do with getting our message out and the public thinking we’re try to manage them. That’s not what we do as scientists. I want to provide the information; what they do with it is up to them.
KB: Yup. Exactly.
RC: But to attack the scientist and say, ‘they just want more funding” or something crazy is really frustrating.
I love it when an oil lobbyist says that climate change scientists are just in it for the money.
MW: Try being in a for-profit business. You’ll hear it a lot more.
You’re also in the business of being a wave expert. So, if anyone hears it, it’s you. Because everyday someone wants to go surfing. And everyone’s a surfing expert. And you’re also the messenger. For most science reports, I’m the messenger – the media. If I distort it, it comes back on the science.
MW: But there’s a good part. And it goes back to the fact, once people know you’re here, and on the island, and you’re their neighbor, they’re going to trust you more. That happened when we put a camera at the Kill Devil Hills bath house. Dave Elder and I worked together when I was at the Morehead Weather Service Office and we reconnected here. And he said internally it was a hard sell because people are like, “What do they want? Do they want money?” And it’s like, no we just want to help. I mean, we’ll get we want through the traffic and subscriptions. But we’ll pay for the cam, put it up, and you can use it for monitoring conditions for lifeguards, or whatever. But it led to some positive things for us, especially with our reputation with different stakeholders like lifeguards. But the other part is we get blamed every time we put a cam up for crowding surf spots. But I’ve got a cam up at the end of my street, so… and there’s more uses for surf cams than supporting Surfline’s business. We archive stuff for a variety, of different reasons. But, yeah, we do get blamed a lot.
Well everyone hates the weatherman. It’s the most common thing ever.
KB: But on the flip side, once you start providing it, a soon as that cam is down — or for us, one of our instruments — boom! We get calls. We get email; “Why isn’t the sea surface temperature working? Because people come to rely on it and expect it.
But there is money to consider. And all of you have a different funding scheme, but we know fed funding is down. And so is education. Reide, I’m sure 50% of what you do is finding grant money…
RC: at least 50%.
So what is at stake if funding disappears? If NOAA disappears, the state keeps going or – in Surfline’s case – subs go down?
RC: Well, what’s at stake is good science, right? Now there’s my official statement. But also 3 months of my salary, right? [laughs]
MW: well, everyone has a lot mouths to feed, so there is a financial interest.
RC: But seriously, I approach my funding like I would my retirement plan. You have to diversify. I get funding from state funds, different federal agencies, I work with NGOs, and I typically have anywhere from five to eight grants at one time from a diversity of agencies. Now some of that is not the most exciting scientific work, because some of it you need to fund your lab. And monitoring and data that needs to be collected. So I balance what I consider to be more mundane science with what I consider to be exciting more exploratory science. And funding goes up and down. And you’re constantly on the lookout for that next project. And I Just got something funded, but I’m still looing two years down the road.
Just like any business that depends on clients.
KB: It’s the same thing. Diversification is the answer. On our side, a lot of our funding comes internally through the corps, but within that there are different pots of money. So I like to make sure I have basic research projects, like the fun science. And then more applied science. The third piece for us is that transitionable science and that’s where you transition a piece back to our corps engineering districts that they can actually put into use operationally. And if you never make the leap from basic research to the transition it’s hard to justify why you need to do basic research. So diversify your portfolio; and if some administration isn’t as excited about basic physics research they might be more inteersted in applied tools. And you shift back and forth and try to make it work.
MW: For us, we’re diversified, but I’ll admit: subscriptions is a really safe business. And that’s heart. But we just got grant from NOOS, so we’re trying to diversify to install some cams for different use cases in the southeast U.S. And I’m excited, we’re really good at cams, we’re pretty good at waves, and we have a huge audience we can tap into for more than just business and recreational surfing. And I’m excited about starting to diversify through this federal money to help different people through different research projects by using some of our assets and expertise.
You guys are almost time frames. Reide looks at what happened 1000 years ago. Mark forecast what’s to come. And Kate’s documenting as it happens. In case of storms at least. Is that accurate? And is that a metaphor for all science: you look at the past and the present to predict the future?
KB: Yeah. That’s it, you hit on the head. You can’t predict the future unless you understand what’s going on right now And you can’t understand what’s going on right now unless you fit it in what’s the bigger picture of what has been going on.
Is what’s it called. Hindcasting? Verification?
KB: Hindcasting. Validation. Verification. We try and do a lot of that here with our data sets. So, we collect them, but a lot of the research then happens going back and trying to understand what happened using that data set. And you probably model that time period and see how it did. We just got into a little bit of now-casting. So not trying to predict anything but running our numerical models in real time, using all the data we get in real time and validating them in real time. And what’s really cool about that is you build up this long-time series that runs automatically, and you don’t have to do anything. And the model is constantly validating and verifying itself. And then you have all your statistics to look back and say, “When did we do a good job? When didn’t we? And when we didn’t, why? And let’ see if we can improve the model.
RC: Mark, how much your Surfline model is integrated across the models that university researcher or federal researchers or NOAA use.
MW: We work at Bill O’Reilly. He’s the Scripps modeler. And he’s been our wave modeler for 20 years. And he runs a model that we’ve put our own special sauce on. So a version of bill’s model that’s out there, but we put tweaks on it internally to add value.
But you guys have meteorologists interpreting, right? It’s not just wave watch 3 plus an interface.
MW: Right.
I think what people think: it’s just some computer. But there’s a lot of humans checking on these computers — at least ideally. Certainly, in the case of y’all’s 3 operations. There are humans making sure these computers aren’t’ spitting out bullshit.
MW: I’ve seen the need for that evolve in my field. For a while there, especially when I was getting out of college, I was worried I might not even have a job in a few years. Because the models were getting good. And I wondered, “Can I beat this?” it’s changed now. There are spot forecasts for every surf spot in the world. There’s a lot of people that do it. We have a lot of competition out there doing it. And you can output every 15 minutes. That’s a lot of info to sort through. Where we’ve found value in humans is dumbing it down to give you, “is the surf going to be good or bad in the next few days?”
RC: Green, yellow, blue.
MW: [laughs] exactly. And also just providing real time, value added narrative on observations. If a buoy changes we can put out a post really quick and put it behind a pay wall. That’s valuable information we can provide our premium users. And our next version of Surfline in August, it’s just a feed of human, value added information combine with our modeling products. But yeah, there’s still a place for the human in my field.
But all of this, the messaging is tough because, people want specific answers. And y’all’s job is to give probabilities and percentages without going too far.
KB: Yes! How do you communicate uncertainty? That’s a huge thing for us in our field. If I could tell you exactly what was going to happen to the beach tomorrow — or in three days from now — I might as well go find another career. There’s still so much uncertainty even inside of these computer models right now. You know, they’re parameterizing a lot of really complicated physics that we don’t fully understand. So how do you communicate the uncertainty associated with those approximations that are happening inside those models to the general public? We know something. And sometimes we even have a good idea of how well we know it — which is starting to be the cool part I think. But how do you communicate that in an intuitive way.
MW:To me, this is a massive problem with storm surge forecast. The tiniest track change makes a real big difference.
But doesn’t it say “cone of uncertainty: right on the graphic?
KB: Take Matthew. I think Matthew was a huge surprise for so many people because that center storm track kept it offshore and everyone was like, “We’re good, don’t even worry about it.” But we were still in that cone of uncertainty. And things changed a little bit. And all of a sudden that cone of uncertainty really mattered for where the severe impacts were going to be.
MW: That and that skinny black line you know? The threats of a tropical cyclone can be widespread. The windfall is displaced to the northwest. And you see the track go offshore, but the rainfall doesn’t care about the track. And we saw that happen with Matthew.
RC: But certainly — and this is getting back to the social science part — the Weather Service and other organizations are bringing social scientists in to figure out how to do the messaging and best demonstrate the error associated with some of these predictions. Sea level rise is a perfect example, the IPCC report is trying to do a better job of demonstrating what the error in some of these projections are. Because it is a real problem. As scientists, we understand the average versus the predicted value and the error bars but the general public has a real problem with understanding what that means. Or they see it as we just don’ t know what we’re talking about.
Then, you have guys like me, who are gonna deliver the message ultimately. And I might hype it up anyway. Let’s face it, a lot of what people get upset about isn’t your decision. The Weather Channel’s naming winter storms, not NOAA. And you guys are trying to quell expectations and say “let’s not overreact.” But the Weather Channel wants eyeballs. And they do weird shit. The other day, they had a chalkboard out. And I couldn’t tell if they were trying to dumb it down, or just introducing a gimmick for entertainment value and to change things up. That’s not straight data. When people say, “Scientists don’t’ know what they’re talking about.’ What they’re really saying is “newscasters don’t know what they’re talking about.”
KB: And what’s cool is, in some of today’s graduate programs, you see more of an emphasis in training the graduate students — as they learn the scientific process — they’re learning how to communicate those scientific results both in the scientific community and peer-reviewed journals, but also talk to someone with a non-science background. And we’re seeing more emphasis placed on that. Because if we as scientists can’t figure out how to communicate our important findings in a meaningful, interpretable way, then — so what? — it gets hidden in some journal some place.
RC:Certainly more of the federal agencies, the funding agencies, are pushing that a lot more. NOAA is requiring that. NSF, less so. But they still want to see the message getting out beyond peer reviews publications
MW:But if you talk to some of the meteorologist at the Weather Channel, they’ll say, it’s a lot easier trying to find something hashtagged “Winter Storm Jonas’ than it is navigating the Weather Service’s home page.
Except they name them after Greek gods and Rottweilers: it’s always Mars or Ajax or Helena something super hyped up. And WS 1 and WS 2 would work just as well.
MW: Totally. But they’ll still tell you, “Well, you can find information, can’t you?”
KB: And having to say “The nor’easter that occurred from February 4 thorough February 8 is a mouthful:” so maybe there’s some positives. Maybe. [laughs] See! We’re scientists, we look at things from all sides, right?
I think the motivations are clear. This is what all weather media does. It’s just the latest evolution of Jim making sure he has a flapping street sign behind him when he goes live. It’s what we do. Find a shot of a flooded road from another town in another time of year, and call it a sea level rise shot from here. But it undermines your message. And y’all take the brunt.
KB: It’s called ethics
And there’s a lot of backlash on media these days. But media’s a big term. The New York Times has staff that’s trained in the concept of ethics and has policies in place. Blogs and Facebook don’t. One post can unravel a century of accepted scientific history with an iPhone and a single emoji. What’s that mean for science moving forward?
RC: That’s where we are, right? That’s climate change under our current federal government. That’s our current EPA. That’s reality. And it’s almost like you have to re-educate everybody over and over again.
KB: With the data. That’s all you can do is go back to the data and figure out a more clear way to communicate it.
So, Reide, I heard there was a meeting where someone asked you, “do you believe in climate change?” And you kind of snapped. You said…
MW/RC/KB: [simultaneously] It’s not a belief!
KB: That’s my biggest pet peeve! I get that question all the time. And it’s not a belief. it’s a fact.
But what’s interesting, is some of these same people will come to the same conclusions themselves — they’ll not differences — but they don’t want to be told it by someone else. They don’t trust scientists.
RC: And I wonder why. Where is it born from? Is it some sort of legacy of land being usurped.
Well Audubon did us no favors in Hatteras. That was a catalyst down there: the idea they distorted the science, that they used the issue to fundraise, that’s made it hard for science and environmental action ever since. But at the same time, the long-standing philosophy has always been: this place ain’t gonna last long. So they know that, they just don’t want to be told that. Simultaneously, there’s a whole group of new people moving here who don’t seem to know that. And they’re like “what do you mean? That dune in front of my house is a good thing? I want it gone I can see the ocean.”
KB: We had a big meeting on dune management challenges and developed coastlines. It was really interesting because we brought the scientists doing state-of-the-art research on dunes, and we put them in the same room with a lot of coastal managers. And for some scientists it was the first time they heard direct feedback on a lot of the things coastal managers deal with. And it was really eye-opening. I had two scientists, we were down in Nags Head, and were getting a tour and he was explaining that they nourished the beach and they had this wide beach and the result was they grew a huge dune. And all the scientists are like, “this is great! Look at this dune! Look at this coastal protection.’ And then he went on to explain how some of the homeowners were upset because they no longer had an ocean view from the first level. It was only from the second level.
MW: Geez.
KB: But living here I’ve been exposed to some of those concerns and I can understand the economic importance of having an ocean view. That gets it rented. That’s really important. But some of the scientist were shocked. They had no idea it could be thought of as a bad thing.
But I will argue whoever owned that house, did not grow up here.
KB: I don’t know. And I’m not going to pass judgment. Everybody has different motivations and the options to make their own judgment based on what’s important to them. As long as they’re going through that process, and they understand the pros and cons.
RC: I also think there are people who’ve been here a long time who are only recently accepting the changes that are taking place. And do think that sea level is influencing some of the changes we’ve seen or the past several decades and that dynamics are difficult to control. Riggs has been out here for better than 40 years, talking to the people — sometimes yelling at the people [laughs] — and he made a lot of enemies doing that. But I spoke to him a few months ago and he was surprised. He said people had contacted and thanked him and apologized for how they acted in the past, and basically said, “you were right.” I don’t know how many people, but I think for him it’s a little bit of redemption.
MW: Well maybe it’s the road at black pelican washing out repeatedly. But we even see surfers crossing over dunes that they just built and put sea oats on at S-Turns. It’s like “No! don’t do that.” It’s just a continuous fight. We put it in our reports: don’t go over h dunes where they’re planting this stuff. But as scientist, part of your job is you have to educate people over and over again.
So this is stuff you’ve seen, right? But just because you see it, doesn’t mean your interpretation is correct. Correlation is not causation. So how do you thread that needle? Are people just prone to self-corroborating their beliefs? I know I do. I mean, I think I’m right — even as I tell myself, “what you see is not necessarily reality.” Is all science just asking that question? I’m looking at it, but don’t’ be too sure. And how do you keep going when you can’t trust your own instincts.
KB: You use the best scientific methods and tools that you can to try and make sense of the data. It is a continuous problem. Correlation versus causation. And I think when we write up our results and our findings, the words we use are often very specific and chosen to communicate the very most we do know – and hopefully nothing more. And if we are going steps further than what we know, then hopefully you’re saying “This is hypothesis.” I think sometimes the nuance in language that gets used in scientific publications gets lost when it goes beyond that.
RC: That is right. But some people see that as we’re not being committal on any of our data. That we don’t’ want to come up with a decisive answer. But it’s because this is what the data tells us and you may not have a definitive conclusion. The best answer is ‘Maybe’ until you have additional data. And people hate to hear that, right? We need more time, ew need more data.
MW:You just have to stick to the data. And for me, when am I questioning, I don’t’ talk about the why part. I just talk about what you see as it relate to the observation.
Well, sometimes there’s two opposing answers, too. I’ve seen reports suggesting we may see a greater number of intense hurricanes because of climate change — but then it also may lead to more El Nino years, which means a shearing pattern. So, its’ two opposing theories, either one is possible.
KB: And anything in between. [laughs]
RC: Yes. And?! What’s wrong with that?! [laughs] But that’s how complex our world is. Think about the human body and how complex the world is.
So, on that note, I want you to make me feel better. Here’s what I’ve noticed: water temps haven’t gotten under 40 the past few winters — that scares me. Sandbars are moving less. S-Turns hasn’t had a sandbar in years, but other stretches have been here for several. I feel like seasons are disappearing — or mingling — we had a week of fall in May. But I know it’s easy to see the boogie man everywhere. But tell me I’m right, or make me feel better dammit!
KB: I guess I would say, “These are things that are in your recent memory.” And seem a little a different. But what’s cool about the data set we have here is we have a 30-year record of waves, and water levels, and winds — and the morphologic response of the sandbars and the beach. And one thing that jumps out at you when you look at this 30-year record is there are trends of erosion and accretion. And they go up and down in time scales of a few years. So there’s all these big climactic patterns that we have influencing the weather right here, and the weather right here is influencing what the waves are doing, and the waves are influencing what the sandbars are doing, and so you see the last little piece and that’s clear in you recent memory. But do you remember 15 years ago what the sandbars look like?
I do. Maybe. But you’re right on a 100-year scale that’s still a blip.
KB: It’s hard to look at the last year and say, “Things are changing.” You have to look at these longer timescales. And that’s where the now observations start to fit in the bigger puzzle of what’s been happening over the longer time scales.
RC: And that plays into many things: whether it’s sandbars or sea level or temperatures or storm seasons. There’s all sorts of different time scales that things are changing. And that’s why long records are important. Because just a shift in the Gulf Stream is going to influence water levels, and that doesn’t’ necessarily have anything to do with sea level rise. So that’s why we need these data records. That’s why it is important to put money into science — and I’m not asking for money here — but these records are important. Because things are changing. We see them changing. And it’s the time scales that they change on that’ important, whether it’s going to influence next week —or 20 years down the road.
But that’s kind of a mixed message: we hear you loud and clear that climate change is real. At the same time, this sounds like, ‘Don’t worry about what you see right now.” So when do you sound the alarm? And how do you motivate people to make changes?
MW: Well, NOAA’s already kind of sounding the alarm. And the science side of me says, “Yeah, we need long records.” But when NOAA comes out and says 10 out of the last 12 years were the warmest years on record. What are people supposed to think? I’m even like “oh shit’ So long term records are impart but it’s hard to ignore some of the data over the past 10 years.
Especially when it has real impacts. You read about how the Viking’s left Greenland forever because of climate issues. That’s fine when you’re talking about 500 years ago and 30,000 people. But we’re looking at hundreds of millions of people on the coast around the world…
RC: Or two years of drought. It can wipe out things for along time.
MW: The sandbar thing is complicated though. It might be that way in your observations here, but look at Shackelford Banks: that surf spot is gone. Waves are breaking into the trees right now. But it happened around 1940, too. So that place is dynamic.
That’s a good point. And we also have an island of Hatteras. Caused by beach nourishment apparently — just kidding. And I know the coastal scientist community sees the “Shelly Island” as publicity anomaly than anything. But it is a new sandbar. And people are already making calls on social media about why it formed. How do you deal with that?
RC: I had someone ask me if it was caused by climate change.
KB: Oh boy. Well, one thing here that’s cool is for 30 years we’ve been going out and doing monthly water depth surveys. Last year we put out three what we call altimeters, and it’s an instrument on a pipe in the surf zone. And it measures the seafloor every minute continuously over the whole year. And now we know at that one location, all the seafloor changes continuously over the whole year. Not just one elevation once a month. And if we looked over the past 30 years and looked at the range of water depths, it was maybe a little over a meter. And that was our complete range. And it only hit the extremes once or twice over that 30 years. Last year, we spanned the whole distance, plus some. So being able to observe at that higher resolution, we’re learning more and more how much change is actually going on. Because we’re measuring every minute instead of monthly. And whoa! It’s a lot more than we were expecting.
Moving forward then, if we know things are changing, when do you make decisions. There was a discussion that said people really only make major changes after the disaster.
RC: Well that’s when it’s easier to make the change — after an event like that. At least to set the stage for making a change. Ideally, what you would do, I put policies on the books so when you have the next storm, you make changes — you can’t rebuild on the first line, or whatever the policy might be — so you’re not disrupting the community now, but when the community is disrupted because of an event, there’s policies in place to make the changes.
But there’s no political will to do that.
RC: Because everything’s still fine.
How do politics play into this. It seems like, in many cases, the science will suggest making one decision that’s smarter over the long-term, but the politics are only concerned with short term. What’s the solution there?
RC: In my position, that’ where things are separated. As I scientist, I provide the data. I certainly interact with town managers and things like that, but I’m not there to provide the answer. I’m there to provide the data for them to base their answer on. And from there it becomes political. But I try to separate myself from that.
But, you brought up the sea level report. That was a great example of the data being immediately politicized, by some of the same people who would say “We need beach nourishment or we won’t survive.” Ignore this report though. So which one is it? That’s where I get frustrated.
RC: But I still stand by the data. And I can stand up in front of any audience and argue the data. Whatever policies they want to put in place is up to them. But that’s not the message I’m trying to drive home. My message is: this is what sea level is currently doing, this is what the predictions are, so in 50 years this is what sea level could be – with this error. But the problem with that report is we were asked by a CRC to put the report together. And we were asked by the CRC to give one number for the state. They didn’t want a range. So they put us in a situation to fail. And once it became political, they didn’t stand behind us. So it was interesting to be involved. And I never thought it would go that direction. I was shocked.
Well, you expect people to want to know the truth.
RC: It was pretty shocking. But I don’t think they expected the backlash either.
Is the Weather Service prone to that type of stuff, too?
MW: Oh gosh, yeah. That discussion reminds me totally of storm surge projections. Because the state of the science tells you that you need to do a probabilistic forecast — 10% chance of exceedance, 20%, whatever — the mayor of New York City doesn’t want to to hear that. They want a number so they don’t get blamed. To me, what you said, is parallel to the storm surge industry. The scientific community says probabilities but everybody wants one number.
And if the number doesn’t work, the scientists get blamed.
MW: And I’m not sure that’s the motivation. There are users out there that just want an answer. And I can understand that. They want to make a decision off an answer, regardless of the scientific integrity of that number. It’s just easier sometimes for people to make a decisions.
RC: Yeah. You can draw an evacuation line, or a building line, or setbacks — it’s just easier.
It’s funny because there’s this whole obsession with certainty that our culture’s gone through. Years ago, you weren’t certain you weren’t going to get typhoid fever. Or that a mountain lion won’t attack your wagon train. This is the curse of becoming so secure. My house being here is foregone conclusion.
RC: You’re paying for a 30 year mortgage; it better be here for 30 years.
At the same time, don’t tell me if it’s not. Or at least let me sell first…
KB: Well, at the same time, maybe that’s the scientist’s fault in how we communicated risk. Calling something a 100-year storm event, is not an intuitive way to actually explain the actual risk associated with that event happening again to somebody.
It could happen next year.
KB: Right! You have that probably every year. And then over the 30 years of your mortgage, you have that chance very year, and you multiply that together and the number becomes way bigger than once every 100 years. So that’s where maybe we can do better as scientists. You’re right: the data is what we stand by and the data is what you go back to, but figuring out more intuitive ways to communicate the results and uncertainty in the data. That’s something we’re going to have to do. You would hope that maybe happens at the next level but it seems like there’s a disconnect there. So I think we need to tack that part onto what we’re doing.
RC: Well, messaging is key. And even more so now. I think back to when I started grad school, research wans tin the mainstream. And now it is.
KB: It totally is! What’s that Facebook page, “I fucking love science?” I mean, you can follow that. And some of their stuff is great. And some of their stuff is totally wacky. And you’re like, “That is not correct!’
RC: Yeah, they did something on Shelly Island, as well. [laughs]
Perfect example: you said CBS was here covering the formation of the island, but from a science perspective it’s not that important. What did you say?
RC: I said, you’re studying this small island — which is not even an island. — that’s developed, and Louisiana’s losing ten times that amount of shoreline every day, and you’re not doing a story on that yet.
It’s complex, too. Because it’s complex world. And information is just as complex.
RC: And again, this story became news because a pretty picture went viral. That’s what started this whole thing! And now it’s CBS News and every other channel.
MW: I hate to say it, but it’s all about money. Engagement drives ads, which drives dollars.
KB: And It’s summer. People want to be at the beach.
So our coastal communities, are we the canaries? Are we the frontlines of weather change stuff, shoreline stuff, and if so, what’s our responsibility? We’re now recipients of information and distributors of information, what is our responsibility as coastal citizens? We’re usually the ones that aren’t ‘supposed to panic, what’s our responsibility in this?
RC: That’s tough.
KB: Good questions.
MW: To me, I look at is as an opportunity for Surfline. We have 1.2 million followers on Instagram. So we have a massive audience. And that’s an opportunity to be an authority in our field — prediction, surf culture, whatever — we can be an authority and not jump on everything that goes viral. But it’s tough. Because clickbait turns ads. But it comes back to that whole authoritative voice. Get good info out; that’s our responsibility.
So I get your info. If you think about it, people are programmed to want to share stuff. Everyone wants to be first more than they want to be informed. That’s certainly what’s changed media. But we could be giving you a precipitation gauge, what else can we do to be more responsible
KB: Focus on your observations. Focus on what happened, where it happened, and maybe not on the why part of it. Because none of us know. Maybe that’s the best advice for any citizen in a coastal community: just open your eyes, observe what’s happening, and communicate what’s happening, but try not to take it that step further and into the why part of it. And that’s hard to do. As humans we see something and want to know, “why did this happen? I think it was this. I think it was that.” Maybe try to not go there? I don’t know.
MW: That’ the best thing I learned in grad school: don’t try to answer why part.
RC: One thing that I would like for more of the coastal community to do is be open to the observations. Be open to the data. Not consider whether it’s good for them or bad for them, but at least consider the data that’s being presented — or the observations you’re seeing for yourself. One thing I thought was interesting with that sea level report, and I keep coming back to it because it really was an eye opener. But several people weren’t arguing the data, they weren’t arguing the message, they were arguing that it would be difficult to do anything about it. And that was the approach that they took. And so they blocked everything they could because sea level’s going to be hard. So what?! Right? Yes, its’ going to be hard. And it’s going to be tough for a whole lot of people. But that doesn’t mean you don’t do anything about it. You don’t ignore it. And it shut down a lot of people. They weren’t twilling to consider the data because they weren’t separating what it might change and what it might do with just the observations and the data. And if more people would look at the data and be open to it — as well as what’s happening around — the message would be easier to provide. That we could demonstrate to a broader audience that things are changing and this is how its changing’ and we need to consider the trajectory it’s on.
KBSeparate the implications.
RC: And, again, you can ignore the why — but at some point making projections, you need to the know the why.
KB: for sure, 100%.
That’s interesting. But we do get obsessed with what’ going to happen next. And that’s where the anxiety comes from. And the I told you so comes form. And then it undermines everything you try to do from the start. Biggest pet peeve. What do you hate more than anything? I’ll go first: naming winter storms.
MW: Mine might be 240 hour forecasts on social media. Super long range stuff, really gets me. And overhyping stuff. It makes our job harder for sure.
RC: Mine has become the ‘belief’ system. People ask weather or not you believe in something. As a scientist, it’s not belief, it’s data. To where the past time, I snapped ,”Look buddy!” and that’s not the right approach either.
KB: I don’t know if this is a pet peeve, but it’s a question I get a lot that’s difficult to answer. And it’s what should we do, and is beach nourishment going to work. I get that question all the time “is beach nourishment going to fix the problem.” And “what should we do?” Any beach nourishment is never meant to be a fix. It’s a stopgap. It will have some effect for some amount of time. And the magnitude of that effect and the amount of time it will help solve the problem varies with a lot of different things. And it’s a hard answer for people to hear. But as I scientist, I don’t study what we should do. I try to understand what’s happening right now. And why it’s happening. And hopefully someone smarter figures out what we should do.
But the towns and county don’t sell it that way. There’s radio ads saying, “We’re saving our precious beaches.” But the project’s just beginning. And in another year or so, the sand will go away, and people are going to be like “what?” Nags Head’s already lining up for more, but they issue reports like 70% is in tact – even thought the section they were trying to save is gone. And where it’s not needed is still there. So they spin it. But if the town was smart, they’d undersell expectations and say, “Look guys, it’s a shot.”
KB: Well, that’s what it is. It’s giving us a shot at trying to put a Band-Aid over something and hope it lasts for some amount of time, until you have enough money to do it again.
RC: And those are going be the hard decisions, right? Right now there’s enough money, but now all the towns are involved, so there’s less money. And the band aids going to have to be pulled off and put on more often.
And long-term, there’s sand resource issues. It is a limited supply of matching sand. And right now, they pull it off wimble shoals, but they’re taking the offshore barrier and putting it on the beach. So even the solution is causing its own set of problems.
RC: Well there’s plenty of sand out there. There’s lots of borrow sites. But it’s also habitat. So we’re creating habitat we can lay our towels on, but we’re taking that habitat from someplace else.
So what’s our scientific future: is there a future Woods Hole happening here maybe? Y’all coordinate already.
RC: A future Woods Hole might be a bit of a stretch. I see ECU beginning to invest in CSI. In fact, Wednesday night the provost was down for Nancy’s retirement party, and he said, “In two years you’ll see the number of faculty double; and the amount of money those faculty bring in double.” I was like, “huh?” But the fact he said the number of faculty was doubling was very encouraging. Because I think that’s one thing that’s prevented us from better establishing the amount of science being done out here. CSI hasn’t grown at all since I arrived 5 years ago. In fact, we had a scientist retire. So it sounds like they want to invest. And that the UNC system wants to continue to have coastal science as one of its’ primary initiatives in trying to get the universities to work together. I think there’s real interest in re-establishing and strengthening in our partnership with the FRF. So I think those opportunities are there.
KB: I’m really excited in where the FRF is headed. We’re in a growing phase. In the past 2 or 3 years hired six new, young PhD level researchers who have moved to the Outer Banks and who are growing the research program here. And as scientists, that’s exciting, because I have lots of people to collaborate with and lunch time discussions – that’s’ where the best brainstorming happens. Or grabbing a beer at the Tap Shack after work. We’ve been doing that once or twice a week. And we’re the dorks that sit at the bar and talk science. But that’s where the cool research ideas happen. And I’m really excited to see where things are going. And I think the opportunities for collaboration are immense. And at the federal agency level we’re seeing a renewed commitment toward collaboration in nearshore research. So I know that the corps, USGS and NOAA have been working toward bringing a lot of agencies together that study the coastal zone and et them to tackle these problem together. So it’s exciting to see where it goes.
MW:I’m obviously biased, but I think there’s an opportunity for the private sector to get involved in these collaborations. We’ve got our big audience and we can get the great work in front of people. And I think we have expertise and assets, as well. The grant we got from NOS and IOOS is something we’ve ever done before. And we hope it will be a building block to help the bigger scientific community in ways we never have before. And we’ve don ework with the USGS on their run-up modeling. And plus, if we do that, it protects us; it protects our business, too. And the fact is, we have mouths to feed. And if we find new ways to support our business and help the scientific community, we want that to happen.
RC: and the other thing we’ve done in the past, working with Surfline and other entities around town, is we’re trying to increase the number of students we have — both undergrad and graduate. And being able to place them in internships – we placed two with Surfline for one spring. And so trying to integrate more with the community. And that’s something CSI has tried to do. And we don’t have a lot of students now. And we’re trying to expand that and look for ways to attract students — and not everyone wants to go to the beach — but thinking about from a career perspective.
MW: we need to do that again by the way. [laughs]
KB: Interns are great. And we’ve had Ian up here interning with me for 2 years now. And the last piece I think we’re seeing is the resurgence of ASBPA (American Shore Beach Preservation Association.) They’ve been doing a great job in the past few years of bringing scientists into the local community. They have a lot of grassroots connections. And Nicole Elko has a lot of connections at the scientist level and bringing us altogether and putting us in the same room, only more positive things can happen. We need more efforts like that; whether it’s me giving more individual personalized talks in the community or someone like the ASBPA providing a more formalized gathering, that can only help.
Well, if a dynamic time, and we’re a dynamic place, why wouldn’t you want to be in a dynamic area if you study dynamic stuff?
RC: And whether they move here or not. It’s great to have people come here for a few weeks a few days a few months and take all the info — as well as what they gained from being in this community — back to where they came from. Because ultimately it gets more people to come here and study, too. Maybe they’ll buy an OBX shirt while they’re at it. [laughs]
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Litter is not an easy thing to document. Especially on a place like the Outer Banks. Wind blows wrappers from bypass to beach road. Seas swallow native fishing lines and spit up foreign balloons. Even on the days when the sand is pristine, there’s no way of knowing if it started that way — or if some Good Samaritan just picked it clean. Until now.
Thanks to a new app called Litterati, all you need is an iPhone and the inclination to take a photo. Upload the image of that pile of butts — or lonely straw wrapper — and the back-end does the rest: from recording what you found, to where and when, to exactly what it looks like, right down to the logo, whether it’s a filter fuming Camel, a sauce pack pimping Taco Bell, or a plastic bag screaming “Food Lion.” And for an emotional pick-up, just flip through the feed for an endless stream of evidence that you’re not the only do-gooder on the planet.
“We’re really focusing on two things,” says Litterati founder, Jeff Kirschner. “Collecting data — because that’s how we solve today’s problems, by first understanding them — and building a community. Because while there’s an intrinsic reward for cleaning our individual neighborhoods, it can also feel overwhelming. This technology takes that isolated act and makes it both social and shareable, and that changes that feeling of being overwhelmed to one of empowerment.”
Sometimes even victory. In fact, Kirschner’s idea actually helped stop Big Tobacco from snuffing out San Francisco’s cigarette tax. With beach stroll season upon us, an Android version in the works — and a local plastic bag ban under attack — we asked Kirschner to discuss how shooting your trash pile can help kill litter for good. — Matt Walker
What follows is the complete transcript of the edited interview that ran in Issue 6.2 (Summer 2017.) The original conversation took place March 2017.
MILEPOST: I’m assuming your app is more popular in urban centers — I could be wrong — but it hit me that it could be really applicable here where we have thousands of visitors every summer coming and going, and they could help us keep track. But you tell me: how’d this app start?
JEFF KIRSCHNER: The App launched on Earth Day [2016]. And we’re intending to launch the Android version this Earth Day this year. We’ll see — you know how technology goes — but I’ll hold my breath. But we’re psyched. And frankly the outpouring of love from around the world has just been overwhelmingly positive and inspiring. We’ve already had 3,000 people sign up for the Android release, which is really exciting. So, the community is building.
But, back to your question. I was walking through the Oakland woods with my two little kids. My daughter, who was four at the time, noticed this plastic tub of cat litter in the creek. And she goes, “Daddy…that doesn’t go there.” And it was this eye-opening moment. And Northern California prides itself on being environmentally responsible and ecologically progressive, and yet everywhere you look, there’s litter. You can’t go anywhere. So, when she said that it was this eye-opening moment. The way a four-year-old can see the world will really open your eyes in a way they weren’t before. And she reminded me of going to summer camp in upstate New York. Because on visiting day, right before our parents would come in, the camp director would say, “Quick! Everyone go out and pick up five pieces of litter.” And you get a couple hundred of us picking up 5 pieces, and within a few minutes you have a much cleaner camp. And that idea led to this inspiration of, “Why not mimic this crowdsourced clean-up model and apply it to the entire planet.”
So that’s the inspiration for how Litterati started. What happened next, I like to describe as weird. I just happened to take a photograph of a cigarette of using Instagram. There was no big idea. There was no rhyme or reason. I just did it. And, from that process, taking a another photo and another photo, I noticed two things happening to me: one was litter did become artistic, and that was clearly because of Instagram; and the second was — and I think the two are related — was that it became approachable. So suddenly I found myself looking at the environment in a way I hadn’t before. And for some context: I was never an active environmentalist. I mean, yes, I recycle and I compost because that’s what we do in Northern California. We have the infrastructure in place that allows for that. But I never considered myself an environmentalist.
But I started taking these photographs and adding the hashtag, “litterati” and telling people what I was doing. And that’s how this community really was born. And at first it started with friends and family. As you might imagine, it was me telling my wife and then some friends and then people are like, “What the hell am I seeing in your Instagram feed? It’s like a Snicker’s wrapper and a cigarette and a bottle cap. What are you doing?” So that’s how it organically began. And then people started noticing this random word roaming around the internet and it was attached to all these different items. Items that were typically littered on the ground. And that’s when I realized the community thing was happening.
And then my brother-in-law started getting involved. And he was in China, and he took a photo of this beef jerky rapper in the foreground and the Great Wall in the background. And I didn’t know it was him. I just thought it was someone taking a photograph and tagging it with “litterati.” And I said to my wife, “My God! We made it to China!’ And she’s like, “Take it easy pal. That’s my brother” But it was that moment where I was like, what if we could plot all the points. Is there data? But that’s when I discovered each photo tells a story: it’s telling us what, where and when. So, I put together a Google map and started plotting points where I was picking up litter and others were doing it and slowly it started to grow. And that one cigarette has turned into — right this second — 364,000 pieces. And one place in northern California is now 113 countries. And it sounds like a lot, but we have a lot of work to do.
It’s not. But it is. And litter’s not an easy thing to document. It moves around. And just because it’s gone, doesn’t mean it wasn’t’ there. And it’s hard to give it scientific purchase because once you pick it up it’s gone. And people say “the beach is clean.” And it’s like “How do you know it wasn’t dirty yesterday.” Maybe the ocean swept it overnight. So: you transferred it to app form. How many users do you have? Do you know how big the community tit is?
It’s tough know from Instagram. At this point, we have just over 10,000 users. So it’s still pretty small.
But that’s still pretty good. Do you know who all’s engaging? Are there groups involved? Have you noticed any symbiosis?
Absolutely. And we’re now baking in those analytics to understand more about individual habits and how we can continue to get people to care. How do you get people to continually engage in something that is not their responsibility or is dirty or is somebody else’s job? Or they’re indifferent, like “What difference could it possibly make if I pick up this bottle cap?” And that for us is really the key. We’re focused on really two things: one is building a community.
Where are you seeing engagement?
If you look at our site, we have a list of the most active countries and states in the US. We’ve had a great impact by a group in the Netherlands. So, there’s a bunch of people in Amsterdam – and outside Amsterdam – who are super engaged. The UK, Australia, and since the TED talk, Norway is showing impact, Belgum — we feel that for just getting out of the gates, we’ve clearly struck an emotional chord with people. Now it’s up to us to deliver on the promise of a simple technological tool that keeps people engaged and connected.
Looking at the list now, I see Virginia is number 5. NY and CA both have coasts.
Do you have any sense of stats between coastal areas and urban centers?
We recently put together a user-profile study. Just to start to understand who is part of this community. And the reason is so we can try to understand what their needs and wants are so that we can build toward that. And we’re finding that there are both people who are members of environmental groups — and a range of groups have reached out, like Surfrider chapters in LA and Hawaii — but there’s also a ton of people who live in inner city Oakland or New Jersey or Philadelphia, which is an hour and a half from the coast. And I think that what’s interesting is — and most of this data is anecdotal, more than actual — clearly people who are connect to their coastline tend to be more in touch with nature than those who are in the major cities. And that goes for people who live in the mountain area or any beautiful natural area. They are inclined to live in areas where nature is more integrated into their daily lives than someone who lives in Manhattan. So, a lot of our usage is around those people so far. And that would make sense as far as the early adopter target, if you will. But, we’re also getting a ton of traction with schools. And though I haven’t done a geographic profile of the schools or individuals, they’re clearly not all on the coast.
What about causes. Where we are, plastic is the number one trash item. And your site shows that as well.
It does. And that’s just because there’s so many things made out of plastic. It’s so prolific.
And cigarette butts for us are huge. An what’s strange is people don’t equate cigarettes to litter. They throw ‘em right out their car windows.
Yeah. It is interesting. It’s as if cigarettes live by their own rules. Because, other than cigarette butts, when was the last time you saw somebody throw something on the ground. It doesn’t happen that often. But if you were to look at the ground, it looks as if people were tossing them all day long. I don’t know what the psychological boundary there is around cigarettes that protects them from this idea of littering — whether it’s standing outside a bar or restaurant to driving in your car — people just don’t seem to think twice about it. Yet, at the same time there’s tons of coffee cups, candy wrappers, gum wrappers and potato chip bags all over the ground. So, my opinion on the littering problem –and I’m putting quotes around ‘littering’ – is it’s a lot more complex than people tossing things on the ground. You’re dealing with system infrastructure issues, as well. And whether that is poorly designed trash cans, or poorly designed trash trucks or people just forgetting and leaving things — you’re dealing with a whole range of issues that’s causing the problem to be as complex and as big as it is. And if we think we have a shot at starting to rectify the problem, we better first understand it.
It’s funny you say. Because North Carolina had one of the earliest bag bans in the whole U.S. It only covers the barrier islands on the northern part of the coast, but it happened in 2008. And we recently had some push to reverse it. And some said enforcing litter was the answer. But is it litter if it flies out of the can? And isn’t it smarter regulation to stop it at its source instead of asking cops to chase litter bugs?
Agreed.
In your case, the app helped defend a cigarette tax in San Francisco, correct?
Defend it and double it. What happened was the city wanted to understand what level of litter was cigarette related. And they did it to inform a tax. But, at the time, long before we existed they did it using pencils and clipboards. They literally walked around and visually spot-checked litter — that’s a cigarette, that’s not. That’s what created the percentage. That’s what created the tax. That’s what led to Big Tobacco to being like, “You must be joking.” And I don’t blame the tobacco industry. It’s sort of like “Prove we’re responsible for the percentage you’re saying we are.” Which, at the time, the city couldn’t do. So that’s what led the city to engage with us. But we didn’t have the app at that point. We just had my Instagram account. And to me, this led to one of the the funniest moments in our history. Because the city said, “Can your technology help us understand the percentage of cigarette litter?” And I knew in the back of my mind, it would be really difficult. But I knew if we worked it out, we could. So I was like “Yes we can.” And we did a 32-site project, randomly selected, with Department of Environment. And we used Instagram to create this data. And it worked. And that’s’ when I learned that we needed to build an app.
Have any other cities or groups used your data for similar reason since?
We’ve been approached by other organizations in the environmental space to use our data to help shape public policy, specifically around extended producer responsibility. So, that means, McDonalds or Starbucks, as a producer, has to take extended responsibility for their packaging. Things like that. We have not gone down that rote yet, frankly because we thought it was too early. And the specific group that approached us, really wanted to go after the brands antagonistically. And my position was, “That’s not the way we think will provide the most impact. Because you’re immediately putting these people on their heels and on the defensive. Maybe a better first approach is to all come together to the table and see if can collaborate in a way that aligns everyone’s interests with the environment. Let’s at least travel down that path first. And I know there’s plenty of organizations that would disagree with me and feel you have to go right after the brand. And maybe at some point you do. But we think there’s a better way to start. So, we’ve already started engaging in a way that allows for that. And I’m all too familiar with green washing and begin very careful of the fact, if you were taking capital from organization what that might look like. So, we’ll be very shrewd about who we potentially work with. But it’s still early for that discussion. Right now, we’re focused on two things: building the community and creating a tool that allows data to be collected simply, quickly and at scale.
It’s funny. With our bag ban, one thing that happened as the NC retailers crated a list that said, “impacted” and some businesses got upset because they were never notified and they don’t want the ban reversed. But if you start with a venomous attitude, things can get nasty pretty fast.
Venomous is a good word. Because it does feel that way. I guess the bottom line is I personally don’t want to live my life that way. To me that’s not fun. If there’s a better way, our intention is to explore that first.
And it safe to say, if you’re trying to build a community, it might help. Our Adopt the Beach program here is basically a volunteer program and the adopters clean the beach six times a year. And then once a year we do Big Sweep, where a couple hundred people clean a range of spots. But it seems like this is a more accurate way since it allows for an ongoing look — a a few people every day — and there’s a level of documentation. Or even that constant message. I know you’re not a statistician but it seems like an army of people — especially in a community where we go from 35,000 year round people in winter, to 250,000 new people each week — is that more accurate? Is this the answer? Is this better?
Absolutely. And it’s better for a number of reasons. First of all, there’s much greater levels of specificity. You can get brand specific, you can get sub-brand specific. For example, in the Ted Talk — and I don’t mention the brand, but it’s very clear since we show a Chihuahua wearing a sombrero — but we don’t just document the brand, but the sub-packaging of that brand to make it really clear what’s the root cause of the problem. And once you have the root cause of the problem, it provides a path to the solution. So that’s one thing — specificity is much greater. And that not only goes for what you’re picking up, but where. Geotags are automatically places on every photograph, to 7 o r 8 decimal points. And there’s a time stamp, to the second. And then there’s the who — you’re able to understand who’s’ impacting the planet. And maybe you start to inspire those people with digital rewards, badges, coupons from local sustainable brands. There’s a whole way to engage those individuals.
Then, you’re also not dealing with the problem of correlating and uploading by hand manually all those data cards, where there’s tons of room for user error. Granted, there’s room for user error in an app. Whenever you input data, there’s room for user error. But it’s a lot easier for us to correct on the back end. And you don’t deal with things like data loss. If those cards go missing, that data’s lost. With us ,the moment that photo’s snapped, it’s saved and stored in the cloud and can be correlated with all the other literati data around the world. So those are a few reason why we think it’s a much better solution. Plus, to your point, it’s every day. You carry your phone with you every single place you go. You don’ t need to have a data card and a pencil. And that leads to behavioral change. Because you don’t need to pick up 1000 pieces of trash in one sweep to be an environmentalist. You can be an environmentalist — or just a normal human being- and pick up one piece a day and you’re a part of this community and making a difference.
Well, we’re a disposable culture. But what’s cool about the photo, is you take a picture, you’re not necessarily calling out the brand — the litter’s the target – but if the target says “Taco bell” it’s hard for them to say, “We don’t bear some responsibility.”
That’s exactly right.
Is this the future of environmentalism? It’s scary when you watch the news. The EPA is gets weaker. Water protections are begin canceled. Keystone’s leaking. Is this the way we’ll out people for infractions? People will shoot photos of spills and impacts?
Clearly, we’re dealing with some political stuff that makes things more challenging. But I think we’re at a point now where, because of technology, people can be part of the solution individually. We no longer need to wait or rely on the larger institutions or powers that be. We can take matter into our own hands and be part of the solution. And I think Litterati is a good example. Because this is one global pandemic that impacts our economy, it affects the environment, it degrades communities, kills wildlife, and is now poisoning the food system. I can very quickly start to make a difference. And not just clean up but gather data. Because we think data is the key to solving the problem. Because that’s how we solve today’s problems — by first understanding them. And we better empower people to be part of that differnce and part of that solution. And I think that’s what Litterati is just starting to do.
Because if you pick up a bottle cap on the Outer Banks and I pick up one in Oakland, traditionally, those are two separate acts. I don’t know you exist, and you don’t know I exist. But while there’s an intrinsic reward for cleaning our individual neighborhoods, it can feel overwhelming: “Geez, hers so much!” What Litterati is starting to do is serve as this unifying umbrella. The technology takes that individual, isolated act and makes it both social and shareable, and that changes that feeling of being overwhelmed to one of empowerment. Now, you and I both know each other exist, in addition to all these other thousands of people — and hopefully one day, millions of people — and we’re all contributing to the same greater good. And that makes people feel hopeful and inspired.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
GLIMMERS OF HOPE
NCSU’s Rex Raiford discusses the shining possibilities for economic diversity on the Outer Banks.
“Land of Beginnings.”
It’s the motto that graces the top of Dare County’s meeting agendas. It’s also the guiding principle behind the Dare County 2020 Economic Development & Diversification Strategic Plan — at least according to its architects. On a sunny morning last December, experts from NC State University, the Research Triangle Institute and Economic Leadership, LLC presented the report. Throughout 2016, they surveyed nearly 900 citizens. Prodded professionals. And, of course, they got plenty of input from The Powers That Be. (Read: the Chamber of Commerce, town officials and major industries who tend to pull strings in these parts.) No surprise then, some of these ideas we’ve heard before. (Push COA and CSI; make sure Wanchese stays afloat.) Others sound refreshingly 21st century. (Finally, telecommuting’s getting the same attention as brick-and-mortar.) What’s next? Well, that’s up to the people making the decisions.
“The chamber, travel and tourism, the marine industry park — they are all doing good things,” says Rex Raiford, Northeast Regional Manager for NC State’s Industry Expansion Solutions. “What we recommend is that the county get involved and pull all the different groups together. These aren’t things that happen overnight. They take coordinated strategies.”
We asked Mr. Raiford to discuss some of the brighter ideas we might choose to pursue. — Matt Walker
What follows is the complete transcript of the edited interview that ran in Issue 6.1 (Spring 2017.) The original conversation took place Dec. 2016 with a brief follow-up for clarification in Jan. 2017.
MILEPOST: What’s the name of the study and what was your role?
REX RAIFORD: I’m the Northeast Regional Manager for the Northeast Region. I cover 19 counties in North Carolina. I live in Williamston. That’s where my home office is.
Can you tell us about the study and its purpose. Was it basically the idea we have these existing, robust economies and seeing what’s out there that can expand on and add to it?
The study is called the Dare County 2020 Economic Development & Diversification Strategic Plan. Actually, the county commissioners gave us a two-part charge. And that was to look at ways to expand existing industries and to look for ways to diversify the economy. Everybody knows that in Dare county, tourism is the big deal and we recognized that going into the study. So when you’re looking at tourism in Dare County, the peak season, everybody’s pretty much going as hard as they can. So, the tourism bureau does a good job there. The effort is to increase employment opportunities in the shoulder season and the offseason and to increase revenues into existing industries during that period.
And at the same time see what ideas or industries might add to that.
That’s correct. Let’s look at some things that could be expanded and some new things that we can explore that would improve jobs.
Is there a challenge there? I can see where ides that would be good for expanding certain industries would be bad for tourism or existing industries. And vice versa. Is there a balance there? How do you thread that needle?
Well our view is tourism is the big deal and its always going to be a big deal. So, there’s not going to be a balance in my opinion. It’s always going to be weighted toward the tourism economy. But we are trying to find ways to balance that to some degree by finding some other opportunities that are different or they complement he tourism economy.
In the presentation, you described some things as ”glimmers of hope.” Can you describe what you discovered?
That’s right. We did a lot of research by talking to many people in Dare County. We also did research through Research Triangle International on looking at some similar communities throughout the country and what they’d done. So there was some interesting things that came out of that. And then Ted Abnerathy is looking at trends. So, his research toward the Dare County project was looking at what are the economic trends the US telling us.
And what did you discover, particularly with the trends?
As far as the trending — and this is more than what’s going on in the southeastern United States, but also the research we did talking with people in Dare County — when you look at Dare County, a lot of the population is retirement age. We talked to people at Outer Banks Hospital, Sentara and others, and we looked at how the US population is aging, the Dare County population is aging and we feel like there’s a good opportunity to expand the health care industry in Dare County. To be more of a go-to location for health care. It seems when people get up to their 80s they start thinking, “Maybe I need to go to Norfolk or Greenville.” And so it’s looking at what can we do to satisfy seniors’ health care needs in Dare County. And I know Outer Banks Hospital is looking at that and they have expanded. But as the population ages, there are going to be more needs in that area. And we feel like that’s an opportunity for growth in Dare County and one that could supply more year-round jobs, like nursing for example. And when I say health care, I’m not just talking about specialists, like orthopedics or cardiologists, that kind of thing. I’m thinking about assisted living facilities and nursing home type facilities. There seems to be an opportunity for growth in those areas that needs to be explored.
So, when I hear that, it scares me. Because I lived in Florida for a long time. And retirees are often on fixed incomes, they don’t like spending. They feel they’ve paid their share on schools and other taxes. Meanwhile, part of the study suggests preparing kids for careers. Can those two coincide? And are these questions for the study — or is that for the county to consider?
Well, when you look at heath care jobs. It’s not just the retirees that could hopefully staying because it would be for them — and it’s not just health care, it’s recreational opportunities for seniors, too — but they bring tax revenue in. And that goes to education and schools. So, they are bringing revenue that goes for many county services. But it’s also the creation for the jobs that support those things. And those can be good-paying, year-round jobs. So, it’s not only providing for their needs, but it’s the job revenues and tax revenues.
Some other ideas were CSI and COA. How might those come into play then?
Well, CSI is a beautiful educational facility that has a lot of potential. Because you look at other similar organizations in other areas of the country – and even the state of North Carolina — they can bring a lot to the community. For instance, development of seafood opportunities. CMAST in Morehad City has worked on assisting companies with developing processed seafood. And that’s just one example of what a place like CSI can do. And in the meeting, one of the commissioners [Danny Couch] brought up the maritime history of Dare County. And CSI has already done a lot of work on that, so how can you take that work they’ve done and use that on the tourism side to bring more people in the shoulder season. One of the things we mention in the report is the music highway in Southwestern Virginia. Over time, that has grown to be a big deal as far as bringing tourists in. People in North Carolina, Virginia and other places look to highway 12, so how can you take highway 12 and turn it into an economic development strategy. Could it be a maritime history highway or something like that?
It’s funny you say that, but 12 just become on national scenic byway and it runs from Ocracoke to Manteo.
Something like that, over years — it takes time to develop these things — but the one in Virginia is a good example of one working. And it’s about building on what you have instead of trying to create something new. That’s one of our recommendations.
That seems to be a common theme. It’s almost like planting seeds, but working with existing assets. Whether it’s the road. The hospital. SCI. is that a standard philosophy?
Yeah, it is. Part of our strategy is called ‘assets to action.’ So, you look at the assets of a community and see how you can build those assets into things that can create more wealth for a community.
COA is another one.
Well, CSI is bringing the UNC system into development for Dare County. And you know, one thing is unusual, is it’s not just one university. The other marine science facilities I’m familiar with in NC are affiliated with one university. CSI is affiliated with many, even though for administrative purposes it’s tied with ECU. But it’s also affiliated with Chapel Hill, NC State, others. That’s a good opportunity for bringing the university system to Dare County. It’s already there, but how do you build on that.
College of the Albemarle is a little different Again, it’s how you’re building existing industries to help existing industries. So, it’s all about looking at what are the needs of existing industries. Or if you did create something different or bring something different into the community, it’s how do you tie COA into that? And it’s all about what are your needs? Sitting down and talking about the existing industries understanding their needs. And you have to get support from those existing industries.
I’s easy to sit down — this happens a lot — people sit down and have a meeting with a community college and they say, “here’s what we need” and then they walk away. This takes an ongoing relationship. And that ongoing relationship and support from the industry needs to be there with COA to get the most out of COA for the community.
It probably has to come down to some dollar, too. I’m sure all this stuff takes funding to some degree. Is that one of the challenges?
Not so much for COA. They have funding — but they don’t have an unlimited source of funds. So if COA commits to working with industries, those industries need to support it. Because COA can’t just go set up a program and spend money of it and then have it not be supported. If you’re really going to have a good program, it’s a two-way street. COA has to support the programs and so does industry . And that needs to be understood up front.
What are some examples of those industries?
Boatbuilding is a good example. If you’re a boat builde and you need training, you need to support that training when the community college brings it to you. Send people to the training. I’ve seen other counties where companies or a cluster of industries say they want training, and when the community college does, the companies don’t’ send people to do it. It needs to be a two way street between the educator and the industry. Or it could be the hospitality industry coming up with specialized training program.
But you don’t want empty desks.
Absolutely. But it does happen. I’ve certainly seen it.
The sailing center was sort of a new idea that was brought up.
We really like that idea. Bob Peele at the marine industrial park has been looking at that. We spoke on three or four different occasions, we looked at land that’s’ available — that’s been identified — and we like the idea of building and developing that into a national sailing center. And we feel like the county, tourism, chamber, needs to look at that and really get behind that as something to develop and grow in Dare County. Dare County certainly has the water resources. And we heard during the community research, a lot of people would say, the water’s too shallow. But there’s a lot of sailing that does not require deep water. A lot of boats have retractable rudders, like catamarans, that are growing in popularity. And the events a national sailing center would hold are for smaller boats. And if you really promote it, people can trailer smaller boats to Dare County or even sail from other counties in the region. So, that’s’ why we don’t look as being just a Dare County opportunity for growth but a regional opportunity for growth. And dare County could be the hub of that as a national sailing center. It would be great thing to sail from Dare County to Edenton to Washington to Oriental to Bath and do a circuit like that.
And I know there’s also tie-ins with more boat building there, too.
And if you do make it a sailing center. A destination for sailing. And there’s some of that already there, but then you can really help people like Bob Peele attract more marine industry and jobs with sailing. And other supplies to that industry.
So, now I’m going to play Mr. Cynical. Because, when you look at what we’ve discussed and what’s being proposed— marine industries, CSI, hospitals, COA – these are all larger, existting local industries. How much influence these power-players have in the document compared to someone who may not be 600 pound gorillas?
Well, I think we did a pretty good job of getting input from all over Dare County. Like Hatteras Island, for example. I met with the electric cooperative there and we discussed opportunities. We also found out there was some funding available for Hatteras Island through the electric cooperative for economic development that we were not aware of. So we did get a lot of input from all over.
I understand that, but even the cooperative is another power player — no pun intended — like the board or CSI. In some cases, these are the same mechanisms that have driven our decision-making forever. Were there any individuals or entities that you spoke with who weren’t part of these existing groups. I can think of entrepreneurs that been hugely successful in the online and digital world, even down south. I wonder if they were heard at all.
Well, when you’re doing a project like this, it’s difficult to find everybody in the time you have to do the project. We did talk to Eric Kaplan, at the Hatteras Island Ocean Center. So we tried to find people who were really leaders and who were innovative in their way of thinking. But you can’t find everybody. And you have to start with existing contacts. And then you ask, “Who are some other people I’d suggest you talk to?” and that’s how we got Eric Kaplan. And we did get nearly 900 responses to our county-wide survey.
Eric’s got big plans, for sure. But it’s still a brick-and-mortar approach. I was thinking of Real Watersports, which is much an online entity as anything else. Do you know if theu participated?
Oh yeah. I’ve seen them. I don’t know if they participated in the web survey, but they may have. How we did the web survey is we worked with the associations who already had email lists they work with, so we cooperated with the county public information officer, and said, “How do we get this message out to lots of different types of people?” And there’s a list of all the organizations in our report. It’s difficult, if not impossible, to get everybody. But we offered a lot of opportunity for people from all over the county to participate. And you cast he net as broad as you can. And we were very pleased with the response we got from the across the county.
What was the response like demographically?
That’s all available. We didn’t see any real surprises. We were pleased with distribution across the county and the industries. The demographics were what you expect: a typical histogram.
A lot of my interest comes from the idea of telecommuting. It seems like a lot of people coming are working from home. Some might be the only people working for the company. I’m wondering how much of that was represeted in the survey response. And did you speak to any telecommuters directly?
Well, we got responses from people who worked from home and live here. And we’ve got a pretty good information on demographics of the web survey. It’s all in there. Check with Dorothy. And that’ s an important point. That was one of our recommendations that came out of looking at national trends: work anywhere people. And our suggestion was to market that to people who are coming from Outer Banks on vacation: you can work here. I work out of a home office on a cell phone and a laptop. I don’t go to a central office in Raleigh but once or twice a month. And we see that as a trend in the US and it’s something that Dare County can look at to bring full–time jobs to Dare county. It’s very attractive. If you can work in such a beautiful place, why wouldn’t you? So let’s promote that.
I agree it’s a great selling point. But I sort of wince at the idea of promoting it. I think people organically want to live here already. When Jack Shea suggest sending letters to CEO’s in New York and Philadelphia, it misses the point…
But I think his point was you have to get to the decision-makers. And there’s a lot of recommendations in our report. You’re not going to all fo them. But once you do decide what to do, you need to get to the decision makers.
I understand why he’s suggesting it, but it seems backwards. As a company moves toward a remote work force, those people who want to live here will come here organically. They don’t need to be convinced. And if you’re pushing for that, you’ll get people who discover they don’t like it here. And more selfishly, my concern is that culturally, people move here with different values that contradict the current way of life. People live here because they dn’t like the city; bring city people in, there might be friction.
What we heard loud and clear is that people in Dare County want to keep the scenic beauty and clean environment. And I don’t know hoe much control you can have over who you attract exactly. But I do see your point. But that’s’ out of our control.
But I’d argue with 300,000 people rolling through every week in summer, there’s enough organic exposure that people who already want to move here will make the leap.
And I think that’s the people you’ll attract with a ‘work from anywhere’ approach: people with a love for the area. Some people like what I refer to as a ‘circus beach.’ I don’t like that. But I don’t think that that’ the type of people who want to live in Dare County.
Looking at that list of what companies look for, there are a lot of things we’ll never have: like an urban center or an airport. But we do have quality of life things we do have.
Absolutely. There’s a quality of life that is very desirable to a whole lot of people. That’s why you get 300,000 people.
When you look at success stories, are there standard rules to follow.
Yes. And Ted Abernathy showed the 12 items that developers look for. And very few areas have all of them, including Dare County. Most every place has is its challenges – and its advantages. Not being close to and urban center is considered a challenge. But Dare County draws 300,000 people in a peak season, so it can also be a draw. So that’s a good thing.
So some things are plusses in one way, or a negative in another.
It can be, yeah.
What are the challenge? I know space was one. So was affordable housing. What else? And how do we address those challenges.
Affordable housing is not only a challenge for Dare County it’s a challenge for most any tourist economy. Not living near a metro center. In a way, it is a challenge, and in a way, it’s not. For me, I always really like going to Ocracoke. And you really have to want to go to Ocracoke to get to Ocracoke. But I’ve been practically every year since I was 17 because I was attracted to the remoteness. So, it can be a pro and a con. Land availability – that’s a challenge. There needs to be an available land inventory done — if it doesn’t exist already. But if were to do an affordable housing solution, and that can be done in many different ways — we presented a lot of options for that — where could we do it? So, an inventory of available land would be a good exercise. Those are the key tings. And for many people, especially y in rural North Carolina, education is a challenge. But K-12 is very high regarded in Dare County.
That was huge for us moving back. Conversely, if things slide, people may elect for another town. I guess when you compete on a global level, you have to raise your game.
And Dare County, the commissioners now, are looking at economic development differently than in the past. In the past, you’ve had tourism, which was the big deal and the groups are doing a good job doing their own thign: the chamber is a strong organization doing a good job. Travel and tourism are doing a good job. The marine industry park is doing good things. So, you’ve got different groups focusing on different areas. What we recommend is that the county get involved and be part of a coordinated effort for ecoconicmic development and pull these groups together. And we feel that’s important.
The cross county collaboration sounded interesting as well. And where we are, it’s not easy. Logically, you would think Corolla would be part of Dare County, and it’s not. Of course, if you’re county, you don’t just hand over a cash machine like that.
And Ocracoke also. But we’ve found is there is an interest in collaborating with Currituck County on both sides. Both counties would like to talk. There may be opprotunities for land, or for housing. Things like that can be looked at.
So what does success look like when it comes to implementing this plan?
I think the county finds ways to expand existing industries and it also finds new opportunities and that the rare measurements put in place to follow that. And that there’s a collaborative effort and coordination of efforts across the county that would be success.
But it’s more of a path then a destination? I think some people see a plan like this and expect an immediate influx of jobs.
Oh it takes time to do these things. These aren’t things that happen overnight. Especially when you’re not in an urban center. These things take coordinated strategies, they take time to develop, and people have to choose a plan and sick with that plan.
FOLLOW UP INTERVIEW
At one point in the presentation, they mentioned that sometimes existing don’t want to develop new ones. Why is that? And was that the case here?
Well, some people might see it as increased competition for employees. I used to be in the paper industry and people would move from facility to to th other for an extra 25 cents an hour. But I don’t know that would happen here in Dare County. And usually, that doesn’t end up being the case. Usually growth ends up being good for everybody. I did not hear that as an issue for Dare County. And most people were very supportive of the idea.
I was more worried that as we get bigger, it might bring outside businesses who compete with existing companies. It seems like even as we get bigger, we get more competition. At one point, we had office supply stores — Staples came in and they closed. Is that a potential pitfall? Could growth end up bringing in more competition than customers?
Typically, a company’s not going to move in unless they feel there’s enough business to go around. And they’ll investigate that up front. What you really want to happen is for businesses to cluster. So, you’ve got boat builders, then you get suppliers moving in to be closer. Which what you had happen at Wanchese. So you have a boat builder, then you have the guy who does metal work, or the cabinet shop, and the engine shop and then you keep that growing and attract more companies and attract more year round jobs.
I noticed in the survey, more support for dredging the inlet was much more popular than investing the inlet. Simultaneously, way more people said invest in tech and health care than boatbuilding. What do these messages mean?Are we at some sort of crossroads between traditional and future industries where we need to choose?
I don’t think you want to choose between one or the other at all. You want to have your traditional industries but you also want to diversify. So you look at trends, and look for growth areas. And one of the growth areas that looks good for dare county is work anywhere. How many people come to Dare County and say, “I wish I could live here?” Well, now you can. And if you an, why wouldn’t you? So it seems like a great thing to promote. And you see all the Virginia license plates in summer. Promote while they’re there and get ’em thinking abou tit. So when they go home, they think, “instead of going on vacation, I could live there all the time.
I met a guy with Texas plates surfing the other day. He moved here to work from home for Dell. And sadly, he lost his job – and now he’s worried about he can afford his rent without the Austin paycheck. But that that seems to points toward telework: you can handle the housing prices. And a company layoff doesn‘t kill 200 jobs.
And more people do it. I work out from a home office now, with my laptop and cellphone and little else. I can do it no problem. I could be doing my job from Dare County — if I could get my wife a teaching job. [laughs]
So how big of a population do we aim for then? If the goal is to create and support year-round industries, and maintain these quality of life elements like open spaces, where is the tipping point where you say, “that’ enough?”?
Hoo! I don’t know the answer to that. If you talk to the specific industries, I’m sure they have ideas.
I guess it’s your job to point out all the possibilities, then it’s up to the counties or towns to make the decisions.
That’s right.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
GREATER THAN — OR LESS THAN?
Calculating the current state of Dare County Schools with CFO, Anna McGinnis
Are schools better off than they were five years ago — or worse? Sometimes it’s hard to tell. Ask the county, they’ll say education dollars are steadfast as ever, comprising the largest budget expenditure. Ask a teacher, they’ll say that “flat funding” doesn’t match rising costs. Ask a school board member, they’ll say “no comment” for fear of sounding unappreciative, and making future budget conversations turn sour. But ask a CPA, she’ll cut you an answer faster than a fifty-cent check.
“All school systems are going to say there’s never enough money to fund all the things they want to do,” says Anna McGinnis, Dare County Schools’ Chief Financial Officer. “My dream is to have enough money so that you could help every child find his or her passion and push that child in that direction, whether it’s medical technology or it’s social work. But that’s a question for the politicians.
They’re the ones who can go to the assembly or county and apply the pressure. My job is to put together the pieces we have and make them work.”
And she’s been doing it for a decade straight. McGinnis remembers the golden years when coffers were flush enough to build new schools. She also recalls the 2008 crash that nearly broke the bank. And she’s managed every year since, cutting corners and shuffling positions to stretch every penny. With spring budget talks on the horizon — and a new formula in place that ties local dollars to state mandates — we asked the chief number cruncher for her best possible answer on this most puzzling equation. — Matt Walker
What follows is the full transcript of the edited interview that appeared in Issue 5.4. The conversation took place in October of 2016.
MILEPOST: Five years ago we interviewed the chairman about flat funding. We’re here to get an update. Because It’s hard to put your head around: you hear the schools are funded as before; and then you hear it’s still not enough. What’s the case? But let’s start with the basics: What’s your name? And what’s your title? And what do you do?
ANNA MCGINNIS: Anna McGinnis. I’m the Chief Financial Officer for Dare County Schools. What do I do? I guess I just make it all work. [Laughs] Big picture it’s putting together our budget so that its balanced. And when you do that, you analyze positions that are needed because 80% of our budget is probably personnel-driven. It’s a very labor-intensive organization because of schoolteachers and staff. And what drives that is based on General Assembly action. They give you the teacher pay scale every year. They set retirement rate. And they set the health insurance rate.
So, if you want to go back 5 years ago to where we kept saying “we don’t have a enough” and they kept saying and the General Assembly kept saying “you have more money.” Dollar-wise that may have been true. And it probably was true. But as long as you have retirement rates and health insurance premiums increasing, your dollar’s not going to go as far. So, total dollars it looked like we had more money. But generally speaking we didn’t’ have as much purchasing power.
Can you give us some tangible examples?
I always go back to 2008/2009 when the rug was sort of pulled out from under all school systems. They asked for money back mid-year. We had a revision, and the state wanted money back. And it’s hard to give money back in May after your school year’s done, which is why it’s important to have a fund balance, which is basically a savings account for us. And we saw it go down to $177,000 at one point. Which sounds like a lot of money to you and me as individuals. But when you’re looking at a $50 million budget, it scares you. Because if you had a hurricane come through and you had to front the cost of putting things back together for 11 schools, $177,000 is not going to go that far.
Suffice to say, $17,000 a school is not a large amount.
And we have insurance, obviously. But, having been through storms before, you usually have t put a lot out front before you start recouping form FEMA or insurance.
So let’s back up: how long have you been doing this then?
I’ve been with the Board of Education for 10 years — the second time around. I’m a CPA. I worked for the town of Nags Head for 10 years as the deputy town manager and their finance officer. And back in the late 90s, the BOE was having financial problems. I had kids. And I wanted a strong education system. So I said, “Somebody needs to step up and help out.” So I left the Town of Nags Head and went to the Board of Education. But I’d committed to a good friend a long time prior that we would start our own firm one day. And year-and-half later, she approached me. So, I worked with her for five years before coming back to the Board of Education.
I never thought I’d go back to the BOE because it’s much more challenging, in my opinion, than municipal finance. Because you don’t know what you’re pieces are going to be until you get school started. You’re still hiring teachers up until the day before. And you don’t know if it’s going to be a veteran teacher — who makes $51,000. Or an entry level teacher who makes $35,000. And the state pays for so-many teaching positions.
I’ve heard that. We pay for some; and they pay for some. And we pay for more teachers than other counties, correct?
Well, we don’t get low wealth money or small school money, which we shouldn’t. But what you do o is take your higher paid teachers and put them in the state positions — because they’ll pay those positions regardless of cost — and then you want your lower paid beginning teachers to be paid out of the county budget, because it stretches your dollar further. Another interesting part is principals’ state pay is based on how many state paid teachers they have in your building. So there’s a lot of balancing. It’s hard to explain to someone. It’s like a puzzle.
It sounds really complex. It reminds me one of those logic problems they’d give you in high school.
It is. And you play with it all year because you’re in a constant state of flux. Because you might have a teacher go out on maternity leave and bring in her sub, and you’re constantly juggling to try and stretch those dollars further. Now, back when thing’s were bad at the state level, they cut certain programs, like staff development.
What’s staff development?
Staff development might be when you send teachers to a conference and they can learn how to differentiate between skill levels while teaching math. Or when they change the core curriculum: there was no staff development to go with that — from the state level. We’ve always managed to do a little bit of that with local dollars. But that was one of the areas that got cut, and we’re trying to grow that back.
That was when the recession hit? When assembly said we don’t have same much money as we thought and asked for the money back? So you had to refigure?
And the county. We gave $200,000 back to the county, too. Because I strongly believe that if you work with the county they’re going to work with you. So, when they were having hard times, we felt like it was our responsibility to share those hard times with them. And right now, Dave Clawson and I go back to the Nags Head days. And we have a really good working relationship. But what we have put in place now — that’s been in place for 2 years — it’s the new funding formula. And it ties our county dollars into General Assembly action. So if teachers get an increase the county will fund that increase for locally paid teachers. And if the retirement rate increases, the county will fund that for locally paid teachers. And if the insurance rate goes up, they’ll pick up that cost too.
Another part of the formula ties into the number of students we have, so if our enrollment goes up they’ll bump up what they give us for instructional supplies or printing costs. And the third category of that funding formula is what I refer to as fixed costs. Like your property insurance or utilities — things you’ll have to pay no matter how many kids you have and aren’t impacted by general assembly action. That’s been in place for 2 years and it helps the county because it helps them knowhow much money we’ll need each year. It helps us with our budget because we plan on the revenue we’ll get from them.
We haven’t taken it the next step further, which is how do we start a new program? Because if want to do that, you’ll have to do it with local dollars or you’ll have to give up another program. Which would probably be the counties’ response: if you want to do that, you’ll have to cut something out.
So, when you say that to me, it sounds like a barebones approach. And I know it’s lot of money. And it’s the largest expenditure in the budget, correct? It’s $20 million?
Our operating part is $20 million. But they add in school resource officers and nurses as part of the number give us. And they should provide those service because those kids are Dare County citizens. But they’ll bump up the total by adding that to the number they give us, even though they don’t give it to us directly.
My question is, it sounds like the attitude is: you get more than anybody. Be happy with it. And I’ve seen some meetings where that seemed to be the attitude on the part of some commissioners.
And to be perfectly honest — and I might lose my job for this — but I don’t’ necessarily disagree with them. So we’re constantly trying to figure out ways to do things smarter and stretch that dollar further. And there are things you can do between state, federal and local money to make a dollar equal a dollar 50 — if you work it the right way. And we’ve been very good at doing that or the past five years I think.
Ten years ago, were you facing the same challenges? Or did you have the money to do everything you wanted?
I think all school systems are going to say there’s never enough money to all the things they want to do. There’s so many more many things we could do if we had the opportunity. We could expand certain programs like cultural arts or CTE — your career technical education. My dream is to have enough money you could take every child and find his or passion and push that child in that direction, whether it means medical technology or it’s social work. It would be nice and ideal if you could do that with every single child. But that’s not the purpose of public education. It’s purpose is to give a basic sound, education to each child. Do we have enough? That’s a question for the politicians. My job is to put together the pieces we have and make them work.
Have we lost things in the past five years?
Lost may not be the best way to put it. I think we’ve streamlined more.
But we’ve definitely lost people — even if just by attrition.
We’ve definitely lost staff. Teachers, staff. I used to have 5 people in my finance department. I now have 3 and a half people. So finance got cut 30%. And partially because someone retired and we moved someone out of finance into another position. We’ve done that a lot with different positions. We have fewer bus drivers than 2005. We’ve also worked with the county. Instead of us trying to maintain our non-yellow bus fleet, they’re doing the maintenance. They do the tire changing, the oil changing, preventative maintenance. So instead of having a full-time mechanic, we’re working with the county and I think that’s been successful.
Have we lost programs as well? Or teachers?
Well, an example of a program we had to cut is Spanish in the elementary schools. And I think everyone would like to see that come back because it was a strong program. But what we did with those positions and transferred most of them to English as a second Language teachers. So instead of teaching elementary kids how to speak Spanish, they’re helping non-English speaking kids learn the language. And it’s not a direct match. A Spanish teacher doesn’t necessarily have the skills to teach second language. So, that’s’ where staff-development money would have helped.
But we’ve cut finance staff. Transportation staff. Maintenance. We’re very lucky in the sense that things went south right after we got our new buildings because the amount of maintenance that was needed decreased. You hope the first 5 to 10 years of anything new won’t require as much maintenance.
But conversely that stuff is probably up for repairs. So you probably wish you had some of that money back.
And again, the county’s been great to work with because they give us $500,000 every year for deferred maintenance projects or maintenance projects. Whether it’s painting the exterior of First Flight High School or doing roof repairs, the amount of capital money they’re now giving us is over $2 million. Back in 2008/09 — or maybe 09 10 — it went down to zero. And that’s scary , too. One budget year they said “ We’re not going to give you any capital money.” And I said, “You have to give us a little bit because we just purchased activity busses and we have this debt payment every year.” And he said ‘okay.’ So usually when you explain to the county what your needs are. So I’m not going to bash the county because it’s a good relationship and I think they fund us well. I think it sour responsibility to figure out how to use it.
Still it’s hard when you hear we lost Spanish and not feel like we’re going backward. And as much as you don’t’ want teachers to lose jobs, shuffling one to another course isn’t the same as having a trained veteran. So where are w e now compared to 5 years ago: are we ahead? Are we the same? Are we still catching up?
I think a lot of what’s changed is the introduction of technology. I think what we’re offering at a secondary level is much greater than what we taught five years ago. There are many more choices, whether it be middle or high school, than when my kids came through — and I had one kid graduate in 2009 and another graduate in 2012, not that long ago — but my child couldn’t go to COA in high school and have an associates degree before she went to college. We now have that opportunity. They can take so many classes on line. So on the secondary level we’ve benefitted because there’s opportunity through technology and through a working relationship with COA to offer kids more choices. So that’s a positive. The other thing we’re doing is pushing down the curriculum to middle school kids so they’re taking classes now in 7th or 8th grade, classes that normally would’ve been taken in high school. That’s changed in the past five years as well.
I think the focus of elementary, even though they are using more technology, does have to be those core subjects. They need to master those before they can move on to the next level. And when the state goes in and change the core curriculum, one of the things I fault them for is not giving you the funds to train the staff to teach those changes. To throw it at you and say, ‘This I what you have to teach” and not give them the tools necessary to learn how to teach it. Because you don’t teach math the same way we learned it. Two plus three will still equal five, but they get there a really different way. [LAUGHS]
These are good points. My junior high barely had a computer lab. But then you hear about teachers buying their own supplies, too. But I’m sure when it’s between funding hand sanitizer and salaries the salary should get the nod.
I have to take issue with teachers who say they have to buy their own instructional supplies because we allocate to each school a pretty significant amount of money to buy supplies. And most principals know if there’s a need in a classroom — not a want, but a need —all they have to do is pick up the phone and we’ll figure out how to make it work. So if someone has to buy their own sheet music, please call — let the principal know. The principal knows, he or she can call and we’ll figure something out. Or hear, ‘We don’t have AP text books.’ Well, why didn’t someone tell me that? If we know , we’ll take care of it. Or one year Hatteras said we can’t afford to com t the Glenn Eure Art Show because we can’t afford the transportation. And it’s like, “All you have to do is let me know and we’ll make sure the bus isn’t charged to your school.” So you won’t have to come up with the money to pay for the students to come up to this art event. Again: if we don’t know there’s a problem, we cant’ fix it.
Do you think it’s because the culture is already engrained that “we don’t have the money?”
It could be.
My son hears us discuss money issues and he’ll pick up on it. You might start thinking, “If I ask for bus money now, I won’t get what I really need later.” And parents can always buy hand sanitizer, but they can’t get you a textbook.
Well, those lists have always been the norm. The Kleenex, the hand sanitizer, the baggies — it’s been going on for 20 years. Ever since my kids were in kindergarten. Now we do try — and its’ something we’re working with the county commissioners on — we do want to increase teacher supplements. Because you have to go by the state salary schedule but each county has the opportunity to pay supplements. Beginning teachers get a 10% supplement. So, they’re making $35,000 and they’re getting a $3500 supplement. Now, to come out with a four year degree and a have $38,500 has a starting salary? But that’s more of a state issue than a county issue. The state needs to do more. And there’s talk about average teacher salary being $50,000, but they played a numbers game to get there. They rolled their longevity pay into their salary — and then they rolled in the local supplement, too.
What’s longevity?
It’s a state program where if you’ve been here 10 years you get 1.5% longevity pay. It’s typical with local governments. It’s how you reward for years of service. For teachers, it’s after 10 years you get 1.5% increase. After 15 years , it’s 2.25 percent. Twenty years is 3.25. And 25 it’s 4. 5. So once you hit 10 years, on your anniversary, day, you’l get 1.5 percent of your salary. So if you’re making 40k, you would get $600 on your anniversary day.
But if you look at Wake County and Mecklenberg County — the two largest school systems — their supplements are grater than ours. So, if you take a state average, it’s going to be heavily weighted by those counties’ teachers where the starting supplement might be $5000.
Fuzzy math.
It is fuzzy math.
But that’s not the county’s problem that’s the state’s problem. And the county’s giving that money to fill in those gaps.
And they do it to attract to attract good teachers. And to attract good quality teachers you need a pretty decent local supplement. Especially here where it costs so much to live. I believe our supplement is still in the top 10 in the state for beginning teachers. I’ve bumped up the upper end of the our supplement for those teachers who’ve been here for 31 plus years. Becaue it’s the veteran teachers who’ve been really hurt by the change in the salary schedule. Entry level teachers and especially teachers who’ve been here five tot 10 years are getting the bigger jump in their salaries.
And that’s all part of a strategy to get good talent here.
And to keep them here. One of the board goals is to attract, recruit and retain good quality people. But I would never say that teachers are overpaid. Even if you break it down over 10 months it’s not enough. And again, they’ve got benefits they’ve got health insurance, it’s a decent retirement plan. So you have to look at the whole picture. And 10 years ago, the retirement rate — what the employer put into the retiement program — was under 7%. This year it’s 16.33%. That’s more than double. And that’s dictated by the general assembly. All full-time employees have 6% withheld — and it’s matched with 16.33%
So, compared to five years ago, do we have less money to spend, more money to spend ?
We have more money to spend. It’s not because of the state, it’s because of the county. And we have this fantastic funding formula that addresses any impacts on the school system caused by general assembly action or increases in enrollment. So there’s a good comfort level. Plus, we heave our maintenance projects funded again and our capital needs. We can go out now and buy an activity bus every year. And our local dollars still have to pay for utilities, maintenance staff, athletics — that cannot be paid out of state money. So when your’re paying 2.5 million in utilities for the 10 buildings, that’s 10 percent already out of what the county gives us. And property insurance is another big hit.
And that’s what frustrates me about topic: my bills go up everywhere no matter what. So seeing flat funding for four years, makes me go “How do people justify not keeping pace with inflation?” To me, it’s the least you can do is keep pace; then it should be, “What’s the best you can do?” Because to me, a good education is what draws people to live here. Like pre-k.
Well, we still have pre-k. In fact, we expanded it this year. We added 1 and a half more classrooms. And we added it because we did have a waiting list. And we did identify where the funds came from. Now that funding might have come from cutting finance 30% — which is okay. And I’m not whining. Because we’re streamlining. We were forced to become more efficient. And you look at processes and say, “Is this relay needed?” But those things take time. And I’d love to do it for the whole district. I tell Dr. Burgess all the time, that this manpower utilization: are we using our personnel in the best way possible?
And we talked about not having enough teacher positions. We look at staffing every year for elementary. And last year we looked at staffing for secondary, which is a little more challenging, and you might have a teacher with only 9 students in one section and 15 in another section. And we might say: “Why not put those 24 students in a class and consolidate some sections and reduce the total number of teachers through attrition?”
What about class size?
This year our class size at the elementary level is smaller than it has been in the past five years.
That’s good. Because isn’t there no class limit now?
There’s a class limit in K to 3. You can’t have more than 24. And then the total average in the district has to be 21. So you have to have a class with 18 for every class with 24.
I guess I wish there was more of a cushion. So each year, you could add a program. I could take Latin, French, German — non online, but with a teacher. But I also went to a much larger school system. And even there was only one AP English class, too, and not everyone got in. So in some cases, kids may be getting more.
Look at my two kids: one did really at AP classes. The other one freezes at tests. AP wasn’t a solution for her. But if she had the opportunity to take those Gen Ed classes at COA, she could’ve done fine, because everything wouldn’t bank on that AP exam at the end of the year . So I think we’ll make a big difference there. And we’ll save parents money, either through AP. Or, for those who don’t do AP, they;ve got another route available. Because every child is different. And we’ll save a those parents a lot of money on kids who want to continue to college.
And it’s also better for those kids getting an education.
They didn’t even have AP when I was a kid! We had honors. AP? never heard of it.
But do we have money – or adequate money? I think we have money for instructional needs. I think what we need to in order to recruit and retain good teachers is focus on getting that supplement up. Because teachers deserve mere. and not just teachers – but TAs
Because we’ve lost TA’s too.
We did.
Are those the most tangible things: losing programs? Or class size?
Class size is back down. I don’t think we have any classes with 30. They’re all 28 and below at the elementary level. That’s a good thing. But the state did cut teacher assistant funding. And we have a staffing ratio of 1 to 1 — teacher assistants to teachers — in kindergarten and first grade. And second grade it’s one for every two. It use used to be one to one. And we also provided teacher assistants for media.
And one thing to point out that is when the general assembly says we’re funding one teacher per 20 students, they don’t include the specials: the art, the music, the media, the PE teacher. Those come out of those allotments. So to say one teacher per 20 students, it’s not a direct correlation. Because right off the bat there’s five extra teachers. Now multiply that by five elementary schools. That’s 25 teachers. So everything ahs a spin.
And that’s where it must be hard trying to fill spots and not lose teachers. I’m assuming it’s hard to switch from health to math or vice versa. But you must try to pick from the same background.
Elementary’s a challenge because you might be being moved from second grade to fourth grade — and that’s totally different curriculum. We haven’t had to do as much of that the past two or three years. but I’m very proud — and Dr. Burgess is, too — that when things were flat and our spending power decreased we were able to handle everything through attrition. Nobody got laid off, which in 2008, 2009 and 2010 were pretty tough years for Dare County.
Were we ever flush? Did we have tons of money? We built all these schools, so we must have.
Yeah, there was definitely more money during the building boom – for everybody. And one thing that Dr. Burgess and I felt was really good was that schools, when they exceeded expectations, they got a bonus at the end of the year. We did that in 2006 and 2007 and in 2008, too. In 2009 the state pulled back the money, so we helped fund it locally because the teachers had been promised it. We would like to see that program come back.
You would think everyone would get behind that — even fiscal hawks — because it’s like a performance bonus.
And not just for the teachers, it would be for the teachers assistants, principals, even classified staff, because I do believe it takes the whole school to make that student successful, from the bus driver who pick you up in morning and says, “have a great day” to the cafeteria worker. That positive vibe needs to come from everybody.
And that positive vibe approach works internally, too, I’d suspect. Instead of constantly worrying about lean times.
That’s my dream. To put something like that in place. It would have to be funded locally, because I don’t see the state doing it again. And the state did something similar this year — but they just focused on 3rd grade and AP teachers. So if that AP student had a passing score of 3 and above, the teachers gets a bonus of $50 per kid up to a maximum amount of $2000. I think that’s great, but my problem is it wasn’t just the AP teacher that got that to that point. Just like 3rd grade teachers. If they scored in the top 25% in the state on reading ,they’re going to get bonus, too. More than $2000. But it wasn’t just the the 3rd grad teacher that made that kid successful. It could’ve started with the Pre-K program, identifying your letters. The kindergarten, first and second grade teachers surely had something to do with their reading ability. So I think it’s a very narrow focus to jus reward that 3rd grade teacher. But you don’t just magically learn to read in 3rd grade. Or that AP student had to learn many things before in order to perform at that level.
So, it was a good start by the general assembly. But it needs to be broader. And by doing that , you’ll get better quality teacher. Because if you reward people for doing a good job, they’re going to want to do a good job.
Do we have any idea of what our situation is for next year?
No. I’m still focused on this year. I won’t start looking at next year until next month.
Is there any hope for more money? I know last year the county staff got raises, might schools be next in line?
Well, again, the teachers the past 2 years have gotten raises. Classified, which are your teacher assistants, your support staff, they got 1.5% this year. That’s from the state. That’s basically a cost of living increase. Teachers are totally different, their average increase for this year was 4.7%. I think last year it was 7%. So they’re bumping up teacher pay. The general assembly also funded a merit pay plan for non certified personnel, where thy funded 1%. so you can give a 1% merit bonus too. But it can’t be across the board. So you have to come up with a plan for how to allocate this $71,000 — which the state provided. Again, the county matched that, so we have $142,000.
So it ‘s more fodder for the citizen to apply pressure on the assembly. because I think the county gets a lot of the heat.
It does. But it’s really the state where you need to go and say,’ We have to have quality teacher’s assistants.’ Especially with what you require in those elementary grades where we assess the students’ progress. Who do you think is doing those assessments? And all our Teacher’s Assistants are highly qualified. And that’s a good thing for dare county. But a teacher’s assistant makes $21,000 to $22,000 a year. And a lot just work for the health insurance benefits.
What can parents and citizens do to help?
I guess provide support, saying “Yes, we want to see Dare County have the best schools. We want to reward teachers for the job they do. And parents need to be involved, too; if you want your kids to succeed, you have to be involved.
I’ve always said we should put a sandbox in every school, then say we need money for sand. Because sand gets funded. Whether it’s nourishment or dredging, I’ve never seen a non-unanimous vote when it comes to spending money on sand.
But again: that’s politics. But to answer your big question? I feel like we’re better off. I feel like we can offer more through technology – particularly for those secondary students. I think elementary, it would be great if we could add that Spanish program back in. And maybe we can look at that next year. But you become a little gun shy when you hit a year that you only have $177,000 left in the bank that you can spend. You don’t want to commit to a new program until you’re totally confident you can continue to fund it.
Are we ever going to be back in the good old days of 2007?
I think there will be a day where we can build more programs. There’s an opportunity to expand programs or bring back programs we had to cut, such as a Spanish in elementary. And I’m very pleased we can expand our pre-k, because that problem gets the most bang for the buck.
Because it helps those kids and the other students in their grade.
Exactly And our relationship with the county, again, I think is the best I’ve seen it in 10 years. It’s the best working relationship I’ve ever seen. And I owe that to our board and their board. And keeping the lines of communication open. And we did talk about increasing supplements this year, and they said “we can’t do it this year but let’s talk next year.” So we we’ll be talking about that. But I’m always positive. We’ll figure it out. Even if moneys tight, we’ll make sure the school’s open this year and make the best we can this year. And then we’ll look at where we can improve. So you won’t hear me say that we don’t get enough money. And you’re not going to hear me say we get enough. My job is to work with the money we get.. And make sure we don’t drop down to $177,000.
I think the Chromebooks are very good, too. Because in college, everything is technology driven. You might have a code to get into your textbook online. And you’re definitely submitting everything online.
And that all that came about in the last three years. Was that all county or state funding.?
Both.
Was that another byproduct of tighter times? Or is that just technology inserting itself?
That came about because we felt lie we were behind the curve in providing laptops to students. And we had some leases coming up, some computer leases, so it gave us the opportunity that instead of buying desktops in the classroom — or the 100 or so mobile units per school— we said, let’s use the opportunity to order Chromebooks. And we started at the high school level and incorporated down to middle school. And we had to identify maybe $50,000 more in funding. but we just used the money we had freed up. But we had planned for that over four years to figure out how to make it work. And we made it work and I think it’s positive. We would love to move it down to fifth grade. And then move it all they way down, maybe. Because that’s the way the world work snow. Even your auto mechanic plugs your car into a computer.
How many counties have Chromebooks now?
Half. I’m sure. There are 115 school districts and 30 or 40 had them before we put it in place a few years ago. So we were on front side. But just barely.
So when you’re planning, do you follow those state trends to make sure we keep up?
That would be on the academic sides. They’ll look and say, “We need to move in this direction. How do we make it happen?” And we’ll put all our minds together and say “This frees up $115,000, lets use it for Chromebooks.” That’s how you make it work. Sometimes people say you make it look easy, but you have to think outside the box and stretch your dollars. Or we may have this allocation for text books, and instead of buying hard text books you buy e-textbooks. And you pay for that one time subscription. And then you have all these textbooks available — and all these novels. And the beautiful thing is: you don’t have people losing textbooks!
And nobody’s drawing inappropriate pictures in the margins either.
Right. And we al know what middle school boys are capable of.
And the Chromebooks can download the assignments. But another thing we’ve done is we’ve put WiFI on our activity busses so our sports teams that travel 3 hours to a sporting event, they can access the internet to do homework. That’s a positive we wanted to provide to those student show spend 5 hours in the afternoon going to sporting events. And we started that last year. We might have it on the longest yellow bus run, too
Any other things like that?
And we have benchmark districts we look at – Chapel Hill, Carrboro, what are they doing? How have they progressed. I’m not the one doing it, but we do look around. We should probably go outside North Carolina. We should look at Virginia Beach. We should look at magnate schools. We already want to do more with CSI — what resources are here. COA. Your kid can finish high school and have an associates’ degree, and then you just have to pay for 2 years of college. What a great savings.
But then my poor kid misses out on two years of partying.
[laughs] Well that’s why they go to grad school.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Hurricane Joaquin never came close to hitting us. But that doesn’t mean he left us unscathed. As the storm tracked east last October, it fed a second system over the southeast that drove wind and flooding across the Carolinas. When the clouds cleared over Kitty Hawk, a huge chunk of NC 12 was missing. And almost nobody saw it coming.
Except for the United States Geographical Service (USGS). For years, researchers had been applying a “wave run-up” equation to NOAA and National Hurricane Center weather models to figure out when the sea was likely to breach the dune line. With the Army Corps of Engineers just a few miles away, that stretch of beach road beside the Black Pelican provided the perfect place to test the USGS’ new work.
“We’ve actually been working with the research pier to ground-truth our predictions,” says USGS research oceanographer, Dr. Hilary Stockdon, who wrote the “wave run-up” equation behind the new USGS Coastal Change Forecast. “Now coastal residents will get specific information on an approaching storm, like where erosion will occur, whether sand dunes will be inundated by storm surge, and how high water levels are expected to be at the shoreline.”
Starting this fall, select regions — including the Outer Banks — can go online and monitor coastal wave action the second a system starts swirling. Residents and visitors can see how their favorite shoreline might behave — down to a single kilometer, up to three days in advance. And not just for named storms and nor’easters, but the everyday weather nobody else watches.
“That’s the real value,” says Stockdon. “The in-between storms that Jim Cantore would never pay attention to — but would keep the mayor of Kitty Hawk up at night.”
We asked Dr. Stockdon to discuss the new technology — and its unique ties to the Outer Banks. — Matt Walker
This interview was conducted in July of 2016. To check the USGS’ Coastal Change Forecast, go to:
http://coastal.er.usgs.gov/hurricanes/research/operational-models.php
For a long-term prognosis on coastal hazards, go to : http://marine.usgs.gov/coastalchangehazardsportal/
MILEPOST: Give us a quick bio.
DR. HILARY STOCKDON: I’ve worked at the USGS for almost 18 years. I started when I finished my master’s degree and came to work on a new coastal change hazards project. I started working on the west coast with the ’97 E Nino storm. And after a couple years working, I went back and got my PhD and then I never left. I’ve been studying coastal change hazards related to storms and sea level rise ever since.
And now you’re in the St. Petersburg. But you were studying up here at Duck at one time, correct?
Yes. In 1997, I participated in a big field experiment at the Army Corps Field Research facility in Duck. And it was a group of federal agencies and universities that were studying nearshore processes — waves, currents, how sand moves — and that’s actually where I met the man who hired me here at USGS. And we still work with the scientists at the FRF — Kate Brodie in particular — we work with them to study wave run-up. And we actually have a cool project going on with them, a trailer that’s set up to study beach profile evolution and wave run-up during storms. Because that’s’ really our focus: when big storm waves come to a beach, what happens to the beach? And can we predict it? And it’s really hard to collect these measurements during a storm. The instruments are expensive and get beat up. Our remote sensing techniques don’t always work well. But we’ve been working with the people at the pier on using lasers to measure wave run-up and what the beach looks like as the storm is making landfall.
Wow. Does that all tie into the model you’re releasing?
Yes. That’s definitely part of it. That’s how we’re going to ground-truth a lot of our predictions. So when we run our models, that work we do with the folks at the pier will provide the tests for the accuracy.
Is that one of the reasons NC is one of the places you’re rolling the model out? Because of the pier? Or is it more like that’s why the pier is here: because NC has such a notoriously dynamic coast?
Both of those. I guess it all goes hand in hand. But the scientists at the pier have been great collaborators this whole time — the past almost 20 years. And then also the Weather Forecasting Office and the National Weather Service — the one in Morehead City — they were really interested in this project of operational forecast of total water levels that includes waves.
And you went to school at Duke, too. Correct?
Yes. I did my undergraduate there. And I worked at the marine lab in Beaufort for a while, too. And that’s where I realized this could actually be a job. [laughs]
What’s your exact role in developing the model and what’s its exact name?
I developed the equation for wave run-up that is used to predict how high waves will rush up the beach. So if you know the offshore wave height and wave period and you know the slope of the beach, you can use my equation to predict how high the waves will run up the beach. So what our model is essentially is it’s comparing a total water level to different elevations of beach morphology. So the relevant beach morphology is the dune height, the height of the base of the dune, the height of a beach berm. And the water level is composed of tides, storm surge and this time variable component which is called ‘wave run-up.’ And that’s the part that has traditionally been missing when people look to predict the impacts of storms on coastlines. The focus has always been on storm surge. But that wave component is what brings that water up to the dunes and comes over the dunes.
So, storm surge is the big, moving blanket of water, wave run up is like the fringe on that front that fluctuates? Is that a good way to put it?
Yeah. so the surge is a mean elevated water level. And then the wave run-up operates on top of that water level. So surge might raise water levels a meter at the coast and then — on top of that –you get the time-variable part, which is big waves breaking and sending the water up and down and up and down.
So this model is meant to forecast all that turbulence on the leading edge.
Yes. It combines all those things. Do you know Mark Willis? He’s one of the reasons we’re doing this. He got in touch with me many years ago when he was working at the Weather Service in Morehead City and said, “Alright, Hilary. I hear you’ve got this equation that predicts wave run-up. We have a section of Highway 12, S-turns, that overwashes sometimes and sometimes it doesn’t. We can have a 2-meter wave, where it overwashes and sometimes not. Can your equation help us predict when that road’s going to go underwater or sand’s going to be deposited on the road?” And I said sure. So we ran the model for smaller events. Because at that point, we were really focused on hurricanes. And he said, “It’s not just he hurricanes. It happens every year year. Or more.”
And that’s how it got started. So the question was: can we run your model in an operational mode with 72 hours advance notice — like a wave model. We’re using all the same information, so let’s run it in a 72-hour forecast mode, so we can provide locals with information about when water is going to cover this one-and-only road in and out of town. That’s how it all started.
Since then we’ve been working with wave modelers at NOAA — National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) — they’re creating a new wave model, the Nearshore Wave Prediction System. And that’s’ going to be rolled out to all the local weather service offices so they can provide more high resolution, more accurate estimates of waves in the near shore region. And what we worked with them to do was add this wave run up component to their model so they can output this total water level — not just surge — but wave run up.
So what is the name of the model you developed?
What’s funny is w don’t really have one. And we’ve been asked this question so much this year that we need to come up with one. [laughs] The run-up part is always just called Stockdon 2006. Because it’s this science paper, that’s how people refer to it.
You need to come up with an acronym that plays off Hilary.
I had a hard enough time accepting Stockdon 2006 to be honest. And I’d need a “W” anyway. But we just call them the Coastal Change Forecasts. And the weather service, their wave model is NWPS — Nearshore Wave Prediction System. And the SWAN model is the background of a lot of models predicting waves verywhere. Tried and true. We’re just bringing that SWAN wave model up closer to the beach so that it can pickup those smaller details of nearshore bathymetry and provide better resolution along the coast.
And the idea is to say when you have a chance of a breach?
We’re focused on three types of coastal change. The first one is dune erosion, so when waves and surge reach the elevation of the base of the sand dune, that’s when dune erosion is likely to occur. When those same water levels exceed the elevation of the crest of the dune, that’s when sand starts getting pushed inland — that’s called overwash. And that type of coastal change is what often deposits sand under homes or across the roads or even takes it all the way across the island and into the sound. It’s that type of coastal change that a lot of local emergency personnel are interested in because that’’ when they need to prepare earth moving equipment to bulldoze sand off of the roads after the event has occurred. The last type of coastal change is what we term as inundation. That’s when the mean water levels — forget waves – just the tide and the surge inundated the sand dune. That’s the most extreme type of coastal change. And if you have a very low barrier island ,that’s very narrow, that’s when you have the potential for breaching.
And that’s the stuff where you lose big chunks — like S-Turns or Kitty Hawk.
Yup.
So how do emergency managers access this stuff?
The Coastal Change Hazards Portal is what we have now. This website we developed for one-stop-shopping on all the coastal change hazards work that the USGS is doing. Right now the focus has been storms, shoreline change and sea level rise. This website will walk you through the assessments we have that will predict the likelihood of different types of coastal change for different types of weather conditions ¬ — tropical storms, nor’easters, extreme storms. If you pick Category 3, you can zoom in on the Outer Banks and see what’s expected to occur in your town based on an idealized category 3 hurricane. So this is out there for long-term planning. When we have a storm that’s about to make landfall, we do this in real time mode. We work with inputs for the NHC and NCEP, using their modeled storm surge and wave heights, combine it with our run-up equation and USGS beach morphology to provide updated forecasts of what might happen to the beach. But you can zoom way down and see what’s going to happen by your home. And then look and see what will happen during different degrees of sea level rise. My aunt and uncle have a house near Frisco Pier and I’ve sent them this.
So average folks can see this too?
Yes. This is available to anybody. Next hurricane we get, we’ll update the forecast as the NHC updates their advisories — every six hours for meteorology. So on this website we provide the forecast of coastal change. But also what the water levels are modeled to be. So anybody can go in and grab these GIS layers an match them up with their own date a to answer whatever questions they have about what that storm might bring.
So we’re already doing our little hurricane dance, checking on the track every six hours to see where it’s going to land. This will let us know the wave impacts even if it passes by.
True. But there’s an important stipulation. The storm surge model we use is from the National Hurricane Center. It’s called the P-surge, and that stands for probabilistic surge. It has a 10% exceedance value. So it still is sort of a ‘maximum expected level of surge.” And the way they get that is by taking the hurricane and having it make landfall in a lot of different locations within that zone of uncertainty. So if it makes a sudden change and makes landfall, nobody is surprised.
It errs on the side of caution. You may get less water, but you won’t get more.
That’s the idea. But there are uncertainty estimates associated with all of this. The National Hurricane Center has uncertainty estimates on the track of the storm — that’s expressed through the cone of uncertainty. The storm surge modeling and the wave modeling has uncertainty estimates mixed into it. Our equation for run-up does. We also include uncertainty in the beach elevations. If we measured that dune and its slope year ago, and it may look different when the storm makes landfall. All that plays into it. For the USGS Coastal Change Forecast, that’s part of the reason we’re presenting a probability: there’s a 70% chance of overwash rather than a ‘yes’ or ‘no.’
So it’s all on a grade so you can choose your level of anxiety.
Exactly. That’s a perfect way of saying it. Because it is really up to each person and the role they have. Are they a homeowner? Are they a mayor? What level of risk are they comfortable with? Does 25% make me nervous — or 75%? And when am I going to initiate some action? So USGS is providing information to help make some of these decisions.
It does seem like there’s an ongoing evolution of getting more info into the hands of the public. Is it a byproduct of technology? Or more people on the beach? Or a perceived increase in coastal threats? What’s driving it you think?
I think hurricanes Katrina and Sandy had a lot to do with it. Less so Katrina. But definitely Hurricane Sandy. And I think people saw what could happen when a big storm made landfall in a really populated area. I got a lot of calls from the media after Sandy. Reporters would ask: “Were you surprised at what happened?” And there were these pictures where sand had covered all these inland roads. And I said, “No. I’m not surprised. Because this is what barrier islands do during these storms.” Now it’s a matter of sharing this information with the people who need to make decisions about what to do out there.
So instead of doing a follow up interview with Jim Cantore, lets get the info out ahead of time so they can prepare. And on an even more local level, it sounds like.
Yes. so the scenarios we’ve listed out on our website, if you look, there’s hurricanes categories 1 – 5 — those are really a worst-case scenario for each of those storms. And that’s good for long-term planning. The real time ones we do for hurricanes are fro people who need to respond during a storm or immediately after. So they have some kind of idea what to expect when they go out to the beaches. For example, after Sandy, some firefighters out by the Rockaways called me and said, “We see another little storm pushing through and I see we no longer have sand dunes where ewe used to. How should we prepare for this next event?” That’s the type of information we want to be able to provide.
So this brings us to the new thing. Right now, we push the go button on the model; the new website we’re working on with NOAA turns on all the time for all weather conditions. And what’s special about that is each beach is going have different weather conditions that are problematic. Those nuisance flooding spots. Or, on the Outer Banks, those certain areas where a certain wind direction on a certain tide with a certain wave height — it’s going to put sand on the road. And that’s the type of event we want to be able to help local people have advance notice for.
So they go online and look and say, “This is going to be a bad day to drive down.
Yes. And we’re working with the NWS because they already have that line of communication open with the emergency planners and town officials. And we heard the need coming from the people in the community through the weather service: is there any additional information you can give us to help us know what a 3 meter wave offshore means on the beach.
When will that be available?
That will be available this fall for sure. And it’s still in pilot mode. Right now we have five grids: one his here on the gulf coast of Florida; one is Jupiter, Florida; one is the Morehead City area north to Duck; New Jersey; and Boston. And the goal is to have 10 of these very large areas by next summer. So the water levels will be available through the weather service. and USGS is going to apply that information with beach morphology to provide additional information of when coastal change might be expected. So this will be available on our local USGS website. And so it will be a time series of the water levels for the 3-5 days, predicted every hour to 3 hours — depending on location.
And that will be available So you’ll be able to look anytime. From the flattest day to a major storm.
Exactly.
Describe the interface.
So I sent a screen shot of the development site. So it’s map-driven. You click on a spot on the coast, and the top figure is time series showing the water levels. The bottom is a beach profile animation that shows the water levels going up and down.
And if it’s above the dune, you’re in trouble.
Correct. The elevations of dunes are actual survey data. That could change though. And there’s no modeling profile change or sediment transport. But he elevations will change depending on where you are.
Is that what you used to predict that breach in Kitty Hawk?
It’s the same model using different inputs. That one was Joaquin-specific. And it was us getting data from the Weather Service ad pushing go. The new way will run continually. But it’s NOAA with their expertise and USGS with their expertise, and bringing them together to make something better.
So was that test drive?
I wouldn’t say it’s test driving. All the models we’ve put out have been in development for a long time. They’ve been ground-truthed from past storms. They’re all based on peer reviewed science publications. USGS has always been more of research organization. But we have a lot of great useful science we want to put out there.
So the idea for this is to have that info out there. Because that spot broke through again after. So the town of Kitty Hawk could watch this and see the probability of another breach.
That’s right. And we want to identify the right people to get that information to. Or with the website, these people can check the information out themselves. And what we’re showing, a lot of locals know already. They know the spots that always go. But we’re providing additional info on timing of these events and magnitude so they can better prepared.
How do we fare compared to other areas like Massachusetts and the Gulf in terms of erosion and surge?
Every place has their own issues. The Gulf coast is generally worse off because the dunes are a lot lower. But on the East Coast you get bigger waves. So it’s a tradeoff.
It does seem interesting that this research is so tied to here — in that S-Turns sparked some of the idea. And that Kitty Hawk is one of the hot spots you ground-truthed. It’s like we’re the poster for overwash issues in some ways. NC 12 particularly. But it’s good research fodder, I assume.
Absolutely. Because the cape extends so far into the ocean you get great storm energy coming through. The dunes are very low in some regions. The island is so thin. There’s been some really interesting studies comparing the impacts of storms compared with the impacts of sea level rise on the Outer Banks, too.
And it’s nor’asters and hurricanes — and flat days. Is the real value in the lesser storms?
The real value is in the things that Jim Cantore would never pay attention to. But the mayor of Kitty Hawk, it would keep him up at night. Or the people who own shops there. So they have a tool to help them understand what’s coming for them in the next couple of days. Because the beach there is different than Cape Cod or St. Petersburg. and so we combine all this local information to give them real specialized forecast.
Where do you see people using this? Travel alerts? Real estate? Beach nourishment projects?
I think so, as it starts to get worked into other projects. I’m working with the Army Corps of Engineers on National Coastal Resilience Network. So this is going to combine a lot of our forecasts with their models for beach fills, and I think part of the focus will be on Corps projects. So we won’t create a travel alert, but I think there’s a lot of rich information in here that people can start to use as we educate the public, and even other agencies.
And this is all your formula driving this?
For wave run-up, yeah.
How stoked are you?
I am stoked. 10 years ago I was kind of scared about it.
What started you working on it?
Well, people had studied wave run up, trying to estimate how high waves would go up the beach in a lot of different locations: the Netherlands, a couple of west coast beaches, Duck, the Gulf. But what we needed for USGS was a model we could use everywhere. So if you’re studying a beach process at one specific location you can really get into the details and understand exactly what’s happening at that spot . You can go out and measure those beaches and you have instruments to collect wave information. But USGS needs to do something nationally. So we had to look at wave run-up and say, what’s really controlling wave run-up. What are the important parameters? So I pulled data together from about 10 different experiments, to come up with this expression that can be used everywhere, just because it’s simple. So its used nationally and internationally for estimating wave run up on sandy beaches.
Were you coming here an visiting and watching waves run up and having thoughts of being oceanographer one day?
[laughs] Sorry. I don’t have anything quite that beautiful to say. But what I did was try to look more at the big picture. And it was going toward this applied science — what do we need to know about beaches that people can use? So the process of wave run-up needed to be simplified to be understood over a much larger scale. And to be able to predict it over larger scale. So people would be able to predict what would happen to their beaches in terms of storms. You know, a lot of scientists really love the details. They love to go to one place and understand everything that one grain of sand is going to do. But I like the big picture. And I’ve got a people-oriented focus.
But no that big picture is being applied on more granular level all over the U.S.
It’s interesting you say that. Because we did have to pull back really far to look at the big picture, but then apply that information over a much smaller scale for it to be useful to people.
You did vacation here, correct?
Every single summer. I grew up n Richmond. Did my undergrad at duke and my PhD and masters at Oregon State.
So what’s this formula look like? Is it like a “Good Will Hunting” across the chalk board formula?
[laughs] I could make it look that way.
Or it more like E=MC2?
That would show I was really smart if I could do that. But no.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
THE GOLD STANDARD
We asked ECU’s Dr. Paige Viren to give us the model for sustainable tourism. Turns out we already knew the answer.
Every industry has its leaders. If you’re making cola, you want to be Coke or Pepsi. Cars? Toyota — maybe Mercedes. (Definitely not Yugo.) Tourism’s tricky. If you’re talking pure money, Myrtle Beach is about $17 billion mo’ better than the Outer Banks. Las Vegas beats us by $44 billion. But that doesn’t make either one the perfect business model.
“I use Myrtle Beach as an example of what not to do with a beach destination,” says East Carolina University’s Dr. Paige Viren. “And a casino on the Outer Banks might be a big money maker, but does that acknowledge the culture? And how does that impact the environment? Sustainability is a mix of that triple bottom line of culture, the environment and the economy. It can’t be just be a quick payday.”
As a professor at ECU’s Center for Sustainable Tourism — and part of the college’s NC LOW program — Viren is helping small towns in Eastern NC incorporate more visitors into their economic future. Her goal? To help them pre-determine the type of destination they want to be without changing their whole way of life. We spoke with Dr. Viren about her work— and why the Outer Banks is more than just a coastal anchor point — it’s the gold standard.
“Sustainable tourism is protecting and enhancing the natural resources so that everyone gets to enjoy them,” she explains. “Not just tourists, but for residents. Because if it’s good for the residents, it’ll be good for the tourists.” — Matt Walker
What follows is a full transcript of the interview conducted in Spring 2016. The edited version appears in Issue 5.2.
MILEPOST: Thanks for taking the time to talk with us.
DR. PAIGE VIREN: Hopefully, I can help. Most of my research has centered on rural communities, but I have done some projects at the beach. I took a group of students to the bluegrass festival in Manteo and we actually collected some data and looked at it in the class. But I haven’t done a ton of research out that way.
Well, what I’m looking at is more pulled back information. I’m hoping you may have examples or comparisons that we can look at. And some philosophical input on how sustainable tourism works and what are the rules of engagement — for lack of a better term.
Well, I think the concept of sustainability does transcend regions, wherever it’s placed. We all have our issues, whether it’s Monterey California or Northern Michigan, they’re struggling with jobs leaving and how do we reinvent ourselves. In Monterey it was the canneries. Cannery Row was all sardines and fishing — then those jobs went away due to overfishing. They’ve done a real cool job of reinventing that area and having tourism be a big piece of that puzzle —tourism that acknowledges the natural resources there. Even the Monterey Bay Aquarium ties in. And it seems odd to try and tie that to North Carolina, but it fits: tobacco and textiles leave, a industries that offer a lot of employment for folks, so it becomes, “how do we sustain our lifestyle? Do we all have to move someplace different, go move to Raleigh, or are we able to stay in the communities where we are situated?”
And I kind of set the stage for this concept of sustainability around a sense of place and the connection people have to a place. Because, really, it’s about people making meaning in places. And whether that’s the beach on the Outer Banks for somebody who’s coming down from Ohio or Virginia, they find meaning in those places. There’s an emotional attachment. So it’s important that it’s sustained so they can continue to have that connection. So when we have large numbers of people that hold that connection to that place — we love the parks or we love the beach or we love the wilderness — we can influence those places staying around. And then you talk about how to sustain that: and it’s whatever is unique to that area. What is the culture to that place? And every place has a different culture. Culture is not just France and going to museums. Culture is North Carolina barbecue, it’s the Cypress Grill in Jamesville — which is a hole in the wall but it has character. It’s the Sunnyside Bar in Williamston. Or, on the Outer Banks, Tortuga’s Lie — there’s not a Tortuga’s Lie in Raleigh. It’s these unique places that you can’t export. Those authentic places that are unique to the area. It’s not the Applebee’s, right? I don’t get my sense of place going to a chain.
So you talk about culture: is there a constant pressure to change as you get more popular. Is that culture always in danger of being diluted? And is that one of the challenges?
For sure. And I think it’s a challenge because you’ve got all those people coming: how do we maximize that benefit economically? And that can change how we do business. Because you want something larger. Or you build the bigger hotel instead of the local hotel. Or you sell off a house that’s been in your family for a very long time because you make a big chunk of change. But in the tourism planning class that I teach we talk about communities have to manage how they want to develop so, what do we want it to be? What’s our vision of ourselves? And, unfortunately, in a lot of places — not just north Carolina — folks are reactive . They say, “Oh! This is what is going on elsewhere, we should do it here!” Or it’s a short-term gain for this investment but it’s not planning for the long term. So we have to think what is our vision for ourselves? People have to have a plan in place, and they don’t always have that. But when you have that connection and you have that sense of place and that emotional attachment, if you acknowledge that, you can help make people aware not to let that type of development happen.
But sustainability to me is a mix of that triple bottom line of culture, the economy and the environment.. When you say development, you have to balance those three things; it can’t just be one. A casino on the Outer Banks might be a big money maker but does that acknowledge the culture? And does that impact the environment? So that may not to be the development we’d want to do? So it requires some organization and some thinking about it and not just reacting to someone getting a quick payday. But I think a lot of people think short term instead of long term. Especially in an area where people need jobs.
I think of a coffee plantation in Nicaragua, for instance, where the owners wanted to sell the property. And the guy who bought it wanted to make a golf course. And the people said, “We don’t want a golf course, per se.” So they rethought how they did it and it was developed into an eco-lodge and reinvented with the aesthetics of the area. But in a poor country like that, it’s very easy for people to say “give us the money and we’ll do whatever.” Then it doesn’t fit with the area or employ local people and has a negative impact on the environment. Keeping a golf course is pretty expensive in terms of up keep and impacting the environment. But when you’re challenged and you don’t’ have jobs, people are willing to do whatever. Because they’re desperate. so it’s important to work with communities so they see the value of what they have an realize that quality of life is not just the economic value of something.
Do people embrace that message? Or is it a hard sell? And who are generally the villains for the lack of a better term?
It’s been interesting, because you almost have to get people to think about it in a different way. Because when they stop and think about it, instead of saying, “Who the hell wants to come to Bertie County for tourism?” When you get them to look and say, “You have a natural resource here that’s really beautiful and if you focus on this, there would be opportunity for people. And you can be proud of the place you’re from.” You almost have to get people to step back so there’s a re-education process that’s involved. Because people have been so down ad out for so long, they have a hard time finding the positive in things. So you help people step back and say, “what assets do you have? what are the good unique things about here?” The project in Winsor I’m working on , they have the Cashie River there. And everyone says, “Who would want to paddle on this?” But I’m a Yankee from up north, so I’m thinking, “People would totally want to do this.’
You have to remind people they’ve got something special because they’re so familiar with it.
Exactly. So that familiarity is people’s detriment. So having someone come and say “Let’s look at this anew” can help them re-imagine where they live. Now Windsor wont’ have the kind of tourism that Monterey or the Outer Banks will have but, you still see this sense of pride in where they’re from. And they feel happy that there’s development going on and that there’s paddlers on the water. So, it’s helping them to look at it differently. And now we see all these grassroots leaders get involved saying” what else can we do?” and all these little projects popping up. It’s not me saying, “This is what you need to do, ecotourism is this.” we say, ‘What assets do you have?” and they take the ball and run with it.
And even with the Outer Banks, I haven’t done a lot of work in that area. but when people talk about the history about the place, it isn’t about the chains and big money it’s about the sense of family and traditions. So it becomes, how can we capitalize on that so people want to protect it as opposed to just overdeveloping it. It is an interesting place, isn’t’ it? Because so many places on the beach have become so different, but he Outer Banks feels stuck in time. Isn’t there something there where it doesn’t change as much as other places? Or is that just me.
I think there’s something there. But if you were to ask some people, they’d say it’s ruined. So it’s a matter of perspective.
For sure. It is perspective. So again, it’s having people look again: It’s not Miami Beach. It’s not Myrtle Beach. But it could get to that, so we need to be mindful.
You’ll hear people say, “the death of 1000 cuts.” When the Applebee’s came in. Or some of the super mega McMansions that have come up. So there is a tenacity to dig their heels in. But you can’t stop the hands of time either. It’s one thing to say, “We need to make a conscious decision.” But how do you do that? Is it legislative? Because it seems some of the pressures are so economic. People in herit houses they can’t pay the taxes on them; they sell them to developers. Developers build something bigger to max out the return on investment. Especially on the ocean front.
And I struggle with that. Because that would require some sort of policy. I know in northern Michigan the footprints have to stay to a certain size. So you’re talking about some sort of policy in the county. But who are the people running the county? Is it the business owners?
Somewhat. What I’ve noticed, if you were to ask average community people —and even visitors — they would say they like it the way it is. But the pressures come independently. The more people who show up and develop a connection , the more people want to live there and the next thing you know they bring their values with them.
And you have a lot of second homeowners. Pat Long did a lot of research on how engaged second-homeowners are. The people who rent out their homes most of the year and spend a short amount of time there. Are they really engaged? are they a stakeholder? Are they sending their kids to the schools?
So you’re talking about introducing tourism as a whole to Bertie County and other places. Is it a good industry, for lack of better term? Is it one that when you’re looking for opportunities to help a rural town, does it stand out?
Yeah. In many cases, if you’re looking at wanting to sustain a certain lifestyle; where you’re not trying to change it. Tourism can use existing infrastructure; it can utilize existing natural resources. So you don’t have to build a superstructure for tourism to come. Especially if you’re focusing on certain market segments, like an eco tourist or outdoor adventure types. So my area of interest is actually adventure tourism. So who is the adventure tourist? Those are the kind of folks who are the first ones there and the last ones out. So, they’ll go in when its not very fleshed out and they like it. They like that it’s a challenge to get to the place. They want a local, authentic experience so they’re not looking for something highly developed. So if you’re looking at market segments, that’s a good thing for communities that don’t want to over develop. So I think you can focus on some markets that would tend to be of higher value and you can make more money off them locally because they’ll spend their money locally. So that’s more sustainable. They want to eat at local restaurants , sleep at local motels, and that money stays in the community. So focusing on that is important.
Now, tourism jobs are not going to replace a tobacco manufacturer or big industry, but I look at it as a lifestyle career. I did a biking trip in the south of France where the guy who was leading us used to be an attorney in Montreal, but he was miserable so he left that job to lead biking trips. And he loves that job. So I guess it’s people looking for careers that have meaning. Something they enjoy and they’re happy about. The Kitty Hawk Kites guy, I’m sure, he started out doing a job that he loved. Even the guys who started Patagonia started out as rock climbers and had to make gear, so it’s when you’re doing something that you’re passionate about. Sure, a Chilean salt mine may make more money ,but it also rapes the country. Tourism, might not make as much money but it’s a higher quality of life. So there’s that balance. it can’t just be about economics. And maybe that sounds idealist.
It seems like the Outer Banks is an organic example of what you’re describing. You talk adventure tourism, surely the first people who visited here wanted a more rustic experience. Even now, you can get a fancy house, but lots of people prefer a beach box or still go camping.
And certainly, the Outer Banks is sort of feast or famine. But if they could focus more on that eco, outdoor focus — not just laying on the beach in a bikini, but the people who want to go kayak on Alligator River or Lake Mattamuskeet, you could reach different markets and link different users together. That’s sort of the work we’ve been doing is having there be a complement to the Inner and Outer Banks, to where they’ll come in the offseason for kayaking or birds. I think the Inner Banks people have been focused on trying to get people from the beach to come out for night. No. The people who spent all the money on those houses aren’t going to someplace else. But there’s a market of people we could bring in that are additional. So, what kind of kayaking can we do on the Scuppernong? So what kind of programming and activities can we promote? Maybe it’s making moonshine in North Carolina. if we look at the assets we have and how we can capitalize on those assets, we can expand the market and more people can make more money on tourism. But not everyone can be a Kitty Hawk Kites, right?
For us, I think the biggest issue is weather. It’s hard to plan around. When people want to do events you never know if it’s going to be nice. And that’s moreso in winter.
But you can maybe capitalize on that. If you ‘re dealing with someone who’s into a certain kind of wildlife or into adventure, that might make it more exciting.
A hurricane experience maybe; come ride out a storm.
Exactly! You can make hurricane drinks and it’s a whole theme! [laughs]
Well, I’m sure the department of emergency management might have a different take.
Yes. For sure. But the point I’m making is it’s how you frame it.
Do you ever use the Outer Banks as an example for other communities.
I definitely have. And I’ll do a comparison. I’ll say, here’s the Outer Banks, now look at Myrtle Beach. Because I’ll use Myrtle Beach as an example of what not to do with a beach destination. And we’ll go ahead and talk about poor planning. Gatlinburg Tennessee is another place we use. I’ll take a group of students to the Smoky Mountains, and we go into Gatlinburg and use it as a case study because they did the overdevelopment thing, and now they’ve tried to do the fixing of it.
So if you’re using these places as examples of what not to do, what are the mistakes they made?
Developing ideas that are not unique to those places. So it’s the t-shirt chains or restaurant chain. The Ripley’s Believe it or not. That money doesn’t stay in the community. It goes up to corporate. They may hire a few local folks on the front line, but are they getting management from other places? Locally owned tends to employ local people, that money stays in the community. That makes a big difference.
But it sounds lie we got lucky ,too, because geographically we’re semi protected. There’s not enough are to go too nuts.
Exactly. the geography of the Outer Banks, while on one hand it can be a detriment because it’s a barrier island. On the other hand, it can’ handle crazy development. So that’s good.
So does that mean Currituck’s going to take the brunt? Looking at Chesapeake and here, you wonder if it will fill in?
I think everything seems to come here a little bit later. So I think we have an opportunity to learn from those other places and say, “We don’t ‘want to do that.” We may not make the same mistakes other places make. Maybe.
It’s ‘differentiate or die.’ there’s a reason people drive from VB to here. So who are the culprits? Is it outside forces or inside forces? Is it the indigenous people who can finally make a quick buck? Or is it people who are coming in and taking an advantage of a resource and carpet bagging? Or both?
Well, if you offer something cheap enough, they’re just gonna grab it up and they won’t have that connection to it. And they’ll do whatever. But I don’t know. A lot of times it can be business people who want to make a quick buck. But for some reason it seems like most business people live there. Correct?
Yes. It does some like most people sacrifice to live here. Like the guy you said did the bike tour in France. People come here for a lifestyle. But then, if you push to extend your season year round, you’re basically signing up for a different lifestyle.
I think if you have the ecotourism stuff, it just adds value, so it’ll protect it more. And I don’t think the impact of those types of those travelers will be the same as the summertime craziness. And you might even be able to make more money off hat smaller group. If you have 15 people on an adventure trip, you might make more than 50 people on a bus who are looking a the price point. Because if you’re selling an experience, you can charge a pretty penny. If you look at an adventure travel company, some people pay$4000 for a five-night gig. So you’re entering into a market where the numbers are lower and the price point is higher. So you’ll make a lot more money off fewer people.
The opposite of maxing out the volume.
But the idea doesn’t need to be a week in a condo. It’s a long weekend gig with a focus on special programming. Not just being at the beach. What is the unique experience? Is it seeing a certain type of wildlife? Sailing on a certain kind of boat? But, again, only if that’s what they want to do, because you can’t tell people what to do. But it sounds like it makes sense to me.
Right now our county is doing a study on how to strengthen the year round economy. Are there examples where you see perfect fits — or not s so perfect fits?
Well, I know in Tyrell and Hyde County, some of the issues are IT related. It’s hard for people to stay connected on the web. But telecommuting could be a good way to get people in your community who are working elsewhere. How is it in Dare County?
It’s actually pretty good. I know a few people who do that already.
Other business could be agricultural—like farmers markets. That’s seasonal, but you can have crafts and things like that. But if you don’t have tourists, and you’re not focusing no brining in different tourists, that’s kind of an issue… I don’t know!
Well, we already have fishing. And we have boat building. But that’s been tough too. We just lost a manufacturer.
That wasn’t Gunboat was it?
Yes.
They left? Where to?
They closed. They had a bunch of bad financial hits.
That’s not good. I thought that was a great angle to go with. Some of the races and boat races were good, too
But SAIL NC is still tourism.
It is. But even traveling for soccer and those kinds of things, parents with their kids, that’s recreational tourism. We’re poised really well for that kind of experience. I’m not sure what else.
It’s hard in our space. That’s why I come back to telecommuting. You can’t put a 500-person factory here — but you can have 500 people working for 500 companies.
I love that analogy. Because if the company leaves, you don’t lose all the jobs. So in that way telecommuting is more sustainable than traditional industries. But I went to a balancing nature conservation meeting, and they were showing these videos that promote tourism in a certain county or whatever. And they always show quality of life stuff. Even the economic development department here, Northeast Alliance, and they’re trying to get big businesses, like aerospace. But all their promotional materials show outdoor recreation, quality of life stuff. They don’t show airplane hangers. They show people out on boats. [laughs] So they can’t put a dollar figure on it, but it’s valuable and they’re promoting the area with that. So they may not put the marketing dollars on promoting the tourism business they’ll use that message to people to move here. Because if you want to move to a new place, you want it to be a nice place to live. But a nice place to live is a nice place to visit.
It’s funny You say that. IT almost feels like a “grass is always greener” situation. People who grew up here wish we had all these modern conveniences. But they don’t realize how good we have it.
Exactly. And that has been the fun and exciting thing about going into these communities. I mean, the people are so authentic and I just love meeting and getting to know them and helping them to see that this is unique. An adventure traveler doesn’t want to go to Miami Beach. They want a unique experience. And if you can package that in a way that someone wants to come check it out — I’m still swearing that they should do moonshine tours where you show people how to make moonshine and then you make a batch. Or that you learn about how tobacco is processed. People like learning and doing things on a trip. But it’s hard to make them see that value because they want to get so far away form tobacco or farming or whatever it is because they grew up picking it.
They grew up on a small town so they want to be like the big city. They don’t realize how good they have it. Is that the paradox: as you grow your tourism destination you ruin it at the same time?
And that’s why you have to manage it. And people don’t like too many rules; they don’t like you to tell them their business — especially in North Carolina. Very independent minded people here. You can’t get in their face about it. And I appreciate that. But if you let the come around to the idea themselves, they will embrace it. I guess you have to plant the seed and let them see it for themselves.
What are the primary threats then. People here talk about traffic. Water quality is a problem in Myrtle Beach. But are there obvious mistakes to avoid that are always Achilles heels for destinations?
The one thing I’d say is when people are doing a tourism plan, they need to make sure they have input from all the stakeholders. Because if the residents seem pissed off that there are t tourists in their area, nobody is going to leave with a good feeling if people treat you rudely. That can be a problem if people don’t feel welcome. That spirit of hospitality needs to be there. So when people feel like they’re a part of that tourism system, and they feel like there were in engaged in the process, maybe they’ll feel a little bit kinder.
Is friendliness a big part of the equation then?
I really think it is. It’s like a having a steak dinner, If you have a nice dinner where the presentation is nice and it’s served on a nice place, it’s going to taste better than the same steak on a garbage can lid. So if you present something in the right way, you don’t even have to have everything be perfect. If people make you feel welcome, you’re want to go back. The place is a part of it, but it’s how people make you feel that makes big difference. You can go to Hoboken and have a great time if people make you feel like you were part of a something nice and you leave feeling like you had a good experience. And that’s part of what we talk about. I’ve been doing a project on the Scuppernong working with Sarah Phelps over at 4-H Center. We’ve discussed the idea of a customer service education out reach, where if someone comes into a gas station or corner market and they ask, “What’s there to do?” The people don’t say, “There ain’t nothing to do here.” People need to know there are things to direct visitors to. I don’t know what to call it, but a re-education for service people.
It’s funny you say that, because I think here is very organic example. Maybe it it’s because they move here and take a job, it’s vehicle to a way of life. They’re happy to be at work, because it provides them a lifestyle. They’re going surfing after work or fishing.
Exactly. I’ve done lots of stuff that didn’t make money but I made connections that I knew would be good. But some people have a hard time seeing value unless it’s monetary. The travel industry association has an ad campaign that shows tourism as valuing things in a different way. Not just going to a place, but what we get out of it; it improves relationships, kids are shown to be smarter. I like that campaign, because it shows it’s more than just money. It’s the guy who’s happy at his job this afternoon because he surfed this morning. I mean, how could you not be happy at the beach?
What’s your exact title and area of expertise?
Adventure travel consumer behavior is what I’m interested in — my dissertation was on looking at adventure travel behavior — however, when I got here, this is my first academic job. So when I got here, it was like “Here I am in Eastern North Carolina” and part of ECU’s mission is we do things in the East. So how can I have an impact in the region where I work? So I said, “What’s the closest thing to adventure here?” Is it paddling? Hiking? But I have a pretty holistic definition of adventure travel: it’s in the outdoors, involves some culture and maybe some activities. And I can’t say “adventure” in certain communities because they think it’s bungee jumping or something crazy. So I try to frame it as eco-tourism and nature based recreation.
So I’m interested in how do we market that: who’s interested in that? Why are they interested? Is it certain personality types? But since I’ve been here, I’ve gotten more into planning and development: so how can we develop in a more sustainable way? And for me that conduit would be adventure nature based tourism. And it is a more sustainable way to develop because adventure doesn’t require the infrastructure that mass tourism requires. And in these small towns they can’t afford that. They can’t build something huge, but they can do a bed a breakfast or camping platforms on the river. It’s not a big $200 night hotel, but it’s a way for people to experience the local culture and environment and probably the community would make more anyway because they’d be spending in local places. And eating in local restaurants and buying local crafts. They won’t be buying a t-shirt form China. Are there options like that in Myrtle Beach? Probably. But how do you find them?
But there are places like Orlando and Vega that seem like the opposite of what you described. It’s all man made glitz and lights and attraction. Is that a functional model? Is that the anomaly or the norm?
Right. And they have a lot of people and they make a lot of money but there’s a lot of issues and problems. Look at the water shortages in Las Vegas. Residents have issues accessing water because they built this huge destination where there’s no natural resources to support that. So they have struggles supporting all those hotels. But is that the type of visitor we’re looking for here? Because they evolve over time, starting with small hotels — now they’re huge. That’s not feasible here. It’s not comparing apples to apples because you can’t do that here. But what was the culture before that happened?
I don’t know. and I guess Disney is what made Orlando, but in both cases it’s…
It’s contrived. It’s no authentic.
And that’s their DNA. Whereas I think here, outdoor recreation and adventure is our DNA. The beach is the draw, that draws a certain type of person. If you’re happy entertaining yourself in the water, you don’t need a show or casino. So when you’re talking sustainable tourism, that’s what you’re trying to protect: it’s maintaining your brand really.
Exactly. And years ago, I guess the Outer Banks could’ve changed it’s brand to the whole Las Vegas thing but I think they have something in that’s pretty special. And by hook or by crook — however they’ve figured it out — they’ve pretty much maintained that. Yes, there’s been some development, but not like other areas. And it certainly could’ve happened. So I think they need to acknowledge that and make sure it doesn’t get to that point. we can learn because things move a little bit slower. We can look at people who’ve done it wrong and overdeveloped and not do that. And maybe there’s some things they can do to manage the traffic. Or maybe there are polices they can put in place where residents don’t feel like “Oh my prices go up when the visitors come down” — like a locals’ card or something — something that will help people have a better feeling about people coming to visit.
There is a backlash sometimes. It’s kind of cool to hate on tourists sometimes.
It’s like Rodney Dangerfield complaining about his wife because he’s supposed to. And I think that’s the mindset sometimes with tourists — you’re supposed to complain about them. So why don’t we turn that upside down and even have program like “be a tourist your own town.” And encourage people to go experience certain attractions, because they’re going to be the ones to talk about these things and spread the word. Get people to appreciate what they have and then that’s your word of mouth to get people feeling good about where they live and sharing it with other people. Let’s be proud of where we are and share it with visitors.
So define sustainable tourism.
I think it will always be a working definition because we’ll always have to adapt to things, but it’s any actions that help contribute to making a community balanced. So, jobs, taxes, sure — but also protecting and enhancing what you have. Don’t you’re your culture, focus on what’s the history and the natural and built resources so that everyone gets to enjoy them. not just tourists, but for residents. So if it’s good for the residents it’ll be good for the tourists.
Well you only have one gold goose, you can’ beat it up. You’ve got to exploit it carefully.
Exactly. and by focusing on sustainable tourism, I think it has the potential to stimulate the local economy, protect and enhance the resources, and I think it fosters community pride. And that’s what’s important: when you’re really happy and proud about the place where you live. That you’re willing to make sacrifices because you like where you live. There’s that connection. And acknowledging your culture. There’s that community pride. It can’t just be about the visitors, there has to be a sense of well being for the residents as well. So maybe someone wants to build that big hotel but if it doesn’t make the residents feel good we need to rethink that. So whatever actions we take it needs to be balanced in that sense and consider everybody.
So describe NC Low. What’s that do?
Well, Stan Riggs — who’s work on the Outer Banks can yield some very different responses, I understand — he ‘s worked on the project and it’s called Land of Water. It’s a combination of Inner and Outer Banks. And the focus of it is, the mission is to find ways to help communities to identify funding sources so these small places can promote themselves. So if you’re an ecotourism business it extends the market and finds ways to help folks. So it’s an outreach in a sense. But NC Low focuses on developing a strategy for that triple bottom line of natural, cultural, economic assets of what they call the land of water region. So it’s the inner banks and outer banks working as a system. And they’re all biologists and geologists. I’m just the lowly tourism person. But it’s a way to say, “Look, you’re right near Mattamuskeet, try to promote bird-watching.”
It’s funny: we were going to ask you for a perfect model for us to follow. But it sounds like y’all are using us to model for other towns.
For sure. And there a places that just have unique types of draws, different seasons, whatever. We all have our own challenges that we need to address; so we have to look within and look at resources before we draw up a plan. But tourism has been a common theme for places where mechanization is coming and jobs are leaving, these places have looked to tourism. But it’s no going to be the end all, be all — let’s be honest. Not everyone’s going to make a million dollars. But the place will be nice and you like what you do. It’s more than just money. It’s the guy who’s happy at his job this afternoon because he surfed this morning. I mean, how could you not be happy at the beach?
And it’s stable. You can’t export a tourism experience.
Exactly. You can’t export Lake Mattamuskeet. So you focus on what can’t go away, and how to capitalize on that.
So we’ll always be the 600 lb tourism gorilla for eastern NC. But 20 years from now, it could be as simple as bird watching in smaller towns. Or kayak tours. Or a hunting lodge. And they could promote that stuff in a way that improves their bottom line.
Exactly. And its doesn’t mean that the Outer Banks is helping all the poor little surrounding counties. It can be that the Inner Banks and Outer Banks interact collectively to benefit both places. So maybe people com bird watching then go to the beach. I don’t think trying to convert an existing market; it’s getting people to come visit who might otherwise not come because we have more options besides the beach. But then maybe they add the beach on the end.
So it’s kind of a lead by example thing. We’re showing these peopl the way to do it.
Exactly. you guys could be the gold standard right?
So how would you rate us then? Knowing what you’ve seen in terms of tourist destinations?
Uh…, I mean, do I say an A? I don’t know. [laughs]
We like A’s. A’s are good.
It’s an A now. But you better stay on that path. Because, like any grade, you do screw up that final, you’ll mess the whole thing up. [laughs] The final meaning, don’t go on a path that will set us backwards. That will set us on a path where we look like we don’t want to look like.
Okay, so give an example of an F then.
Well, before I would’ve said Gatlinburg. Tennessee but they’ve really made some big strides in changing what they did. But that took some time and a lot of leadership to change from being not so great, to where now they’re a little better. When I think about Fort Lauderdale or something, but that’s not my kind of travel, so it might not be fair for me to say that.
It sounds like the goal is just not to sell out entirely. You have to have some level of organic experience or people will smell it and get turned off.
And even if you think about places like Qatar, where they make man-made ski resorts with fake snow and they’re indoors. Sure, they have the money to invest it, but it has to be one the craziest ideas. And how sustainable is it? Some countries aren’t learning that lesson, I guess.
What did you learn at the bluegrass festivals?
That was really interesting. For the class, the goal was to learn the value of understanding who your market is. So they designed a survey and we want out an collected info. And what’s funny is, they didn’t have beer served, and everyone who filled out the survey said “We need beer.” So, I guess what we learned is that people who like bluegrass like beer at their events. And to be honest, so would I [laughs]. But we got a snapshot of who the visitors were and were trying to help organizers know who to market to. And festivals like that can extend the season somewhat for places. And people said they enjoyed it and would be back.
And that to me is not necessarily a beach going crowd. That seems like extending the reach.
And those types of programs and events are good ways to extend the season. And that is a beautiful setting. But I’d like to have a beer myself. [laughs]
We also have a a new event site in Nags Head and one of the options was a hotel where they could they could do tradeshows and conferences in wintertime. But some people got spooked and said, “That’s not who we are”.” Is that pushing it you think?
Well, conventions and visitors bureaus, that’s what they’re charged with. And conventions bring big numbers of people. I don’t think that needs to be the focus. Maybe bringing in certain kinds of tradeshows — if you were bringing in outfitters or things like that — but for me it doesn’t seem authentic to who we are. Are people coming to tradeshows. Are they going to rent a house. And that’s what’s unique about the outer banks too. But I’m sure businesses could rent a house.
Well my experience with tradeshows is you spend 3 days indoors. And we’re an outdoor destination.
Be who you are, and be it well. They can go to Raleigh and do a tradeshow right? You can’t be everything. You need to say “This is who we are” and stick to those talking points. And that’s how you stay good at what you’re doing. Because when you try to sell too many products, that’s when you run into problems.
Differentiate or die.
Exactly. And there’s some neat initiatives going on, and people right now are primed to make sure they’re protecting what we have. So it’s an interesting climate right now. People are more willing to listen, I think. We have a generation of people who’ve grown up with a different perspective. So we’ll see.
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
UNITS OF WOW
Meet the weather nerds who crack the code on brilliant sunbursts.
Bay Drive toward dusk is a rush of activity. Parents and strollers pour from neighborhood houses. Cars and bikes park at random. All anxious to catch a glimpse as the sun says “Peace out” and dips behind the horizon. Some days are jaw-dropping brilliant; some not so much. (Just check your Instagram feed.) But what if there was no need to rush? What if you could go online in the morning and see how high-rez — or ho-hum — your evening light show will be?
Well, now you can. Thanks to a few Penn State students and grads, a new website is predicting the brilliance of both sunsets and sunrises up to 32 hours in advance, using nothing but NOAA’s forecast models — and some clever computing.
“Basically, we take the data that’s produced by NOAA’s weather model and run it through a special algorithm,” says 19-year-old Stephen Hallet, the model developer for SunsetWx.com. “It picks out which variables make up a good sunset and sunrise and then spits it out into an image.”
An image just like any online weather map of the U.S. Except, instead of rainstorms it predicts sun refraction: reds and oranges indicate a potential showstopper that says “drop everything”; greens and blues tells you to keep cooking dinner. The website’s been live only since last November, but it’s already generating buzz for producing results with 85 percent accuracy. And while the forecast itself is pretty broad — think states, not zip codes — as technology advances so will its potential. Who knows, maybe in another decade people will plan Outer Banks weddings and photo shoots on the flamboyant comings and goings of our favorite star? (Or, they’ll just have another reason to yell at the weatherman.) Either way, add it to your list of forecasts to follow.
As Hallet notes, “The model has days that it nails it — and days it could do better. But it’s nailed many more sunsets and sunrises than it has missed.”
This issue was conducted in December 2015 and originally appeared in the winter 2015/2016 issue.
MILEPOST: How old are you?
STEVE HALLET: I am 19 years old.
Where are you from?
I’m from right outside of Philadelphia, PA.
Have you ever visited the Outer Banks before?
No, but I’ve driven through North Carolina a couple times. I’ve always wanted to visit the Outer Banks because I know that’s where the Wright Brothers first flew their plane and I’ve heard it’s pretty.
Oh yes. You’ve definitely got to come check it out some time. We’ve got some good sunsets here too. So what is your official title with SunsetWx?
My official title is, I believe, model developer.
What expertise do you bring to the project?
Basically what I do is I take the data that’s produced by the weather model and I run it through an algorithm that I created that take variables from a huge assortment of data. It picks out which variables make up a good sunset and sunrise and it basically then spits it out into an image.
What kind of variables does it look at?
It looks at variables such as the moisture distribution pattern throughout the atmosphere and for whether a front has passed, because right after a cold front has passed or thunderstorms and everything the air behind that has been proven to contribute positively to the quality of the sunset. So it looks for that as well.
When you talk about sunsets in terms of “quality” what sort of scale are you using? What rates one higher?
So this was a challenge at first. The algorithm itself is ranked arbitrarily off of random numbers that, if we assign the value of, let’s say -700 to a sunset, what on Earth does that mean, right? So we then just decide to ditch any numbers and we decide to go on the unit of “vividness”. I mean, it’s a qualitative unit. It’s not a quantitative unit. But really, it’s in units of “wow”. Like, “the wow factor”. If there’s a sunset or sunrise at the top of our scale, well that’s gonna make you really go, “wow”, and make you stop and pause and admire the sunset. Not just your photographers or enthusiasts or anything. It’s just gonna catch your attention when you’re driving home from work or something. You’re gonna want to stop the car. So it’s measured in units of vividness I would say.
How did this whole project come about?
I work with two other people, Jacob DeFlitch, meteorologist for AccuWeather, and Ben Reppert, who’s a research assistant at Penn State. And Jake DeFlitch, when he went to Penn State, was hired as a landscape photographer by the university. So he would always go out at sunset and try to photograph it. Him being a meteorology major, he wanted to know what factors made a good sunset. So he did a little research and he consulted with Ben, and then the two of them contacted me earlier in the year, and Ben brought his idea to life.
Why did they reach out to you? It sounds like you’re the math behind this operation.
They reached out to me they knew I was pretty good at the computer language that would be useful in coding this algorithm, and I was happy to do it.
How long did it take you to create the algorithm?
It took us about three weeks. Basically, what we would do is Jake and Ben would analyze the atmosphere and then tell me what variables that produce a good sunset. We met several times to look over sunsets across the country and determine, well, maybe, you know, “insert this variable” or “take out this variable” and we refined the algorithm. It took about three weeks for that process of going from literally nothing to a product that would be appropriate for the public’s use.
That sounds like fun. You guys just, what, met on a hillside and gazed at the sunset for a little while?
Yeah. They promised me food, and if you entice a poor college student with food, then I’ll certainly do the work for you.
I know that’s true. So is it a different algorithm for program that predicts the sunrises and sunsets?
Yeah. The differences between a sunrise and a sunset, there’s one fundamental difference. It’s something called “pressure tendency”. So I have to do two algorithms and I’d say the biggest factor, I mean, there’s obviously others, but the biggest one is that pressure tendency, and I have to tweak that around a bit. So there are two different algorithms that make up the images that you see.
Basically what the model is looking for is a favorable profile of the atmosphere that makes for a good sunrise/sunset. Things that lead to a favorable sunrise/sunset are the absence of low clouds and a broken deck of clouds that’s at the middle or high levels of the atmosphere. It also sniffs out regions where the air is sinking, which indicates the potential for a more favorable sunset. For those cool blues, the model would sense low clouds and precipitation falling. Also, if the clouds aren’t broken (scattered), and there’s a thick deck of clouds the model will sense that and penalize.
The biggest change in variables it looks for regarding sunrises/sunsets are whether the air is sinking or rising. It’ll reward for sinking air on the sunset algorithm and reward when it sniffs out rising air with the sunrise algorithm. So the model meshes all these variables together on a numerical scale. What I do is take these numbers and turn them within the algorithm from numerical to qualitative. Because, what good is it to the layman if you say ‘expect a sunset of 35 today.’ I wouldn’t even know what that means if I didn’t write the algorithm! So, I tell the algorithm to rank and then display the smaller numbers as ‘less vivid’ and the larger numbers as ‘more vivid’.
Where are you pulling the atmospheric data from? Is that something you have to input or does that pull automatically?
My data comes from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA). They have weather models that run, and those weather models just spit out data that’s available for public use, and it’s free data. What we did is they just decided on what model to use and then I just pulled that data from NOAA, and then my algorithm processed all the variables inside that data. My scripts pull the data from NOAA and input it every day.
How far out can your program predict a sunrise or a sunset?
Currently, the regional United States algorithm I use combined with that model data predicts it out 32 hours into the future. However, the global sunrises and sunsets, because I use a different model- the model I use for the United States doesn’t cover the globe- and that goes out to 48 hours.
What about the European model?
So for the European model, I need $250,000 per year, because they charge for that data, but, never fear, I use a different model from NOAA called G.F.S. and it produces model forecasts for the world. I just take that data because it’s, obviously, free.
Now, I gotta say, we’re down here on the Outer Banks, which is a tiny barrier island, and I almost couldn’t find us on your map. The map is kind of broad right now. Is there any chance we’ll be able to “zoom in”. How drilled down can you get with those weather patterns?
See, therein lies the challenge. The weather models are very powerful. They’re using the top ten super computers in the world and everything. But we’re not there yet, just with technology. So that I can zoom in, let’s say, near Kill Devil Hills or wherever you are in the Outer Banks and just give that forecast for your house. I can’t do that, because the model’s resolution, how fine it sees the data, it’s not there yet. Don’t get me wrong, I wish I was able to do that just for my house and my street. The weather model, it’s very coarse when you zoom in. It’s like zooming in to a low quality picture. The picture doesn’t look that bad when you see it unzoomed, but when you zoom in you can see the individual pixels. The model has the same exact set up. When you zoom in real close to Kill Devil Hills from the whole entire United States, it’s gonna look pretty grainy and it’s not gonna look visually pleasing.
Is that something you anticipate could improve if, for instance, you had a sack of money?
Well actually, with time, NOAA and all the computer models around the world, they’re getting finer with the spacing between those pixels. So what that’s gonna do is, in 10 years I’ll probably be able to do that. But it takes a crazy amount of computing power to even produce the image of the United States that’s on the site. Or, sorry, to produce the data that compiles and forms the image of the United States on the site.
Going back for a moment to how far out you can predict the sunsets, is that something you see may improve in the future? Are we talking, you can maybe plan a week in advance kind of thing?
Oh yeah. As the computers get better, so will the methods that go into them forecasting it. Because what the weather model does right now is, it cannot model individual air molecules and there are tons of air molecules in the atmosphere. So what it does is it guesses, and it guesses between those pixels. So as the pixels get closer and closer together, it’s not gonna have to go over such a great distance to guess. So, in turn, it will become more accurate. As computing power increases, the model won’t have to guess as much, and therefore will become more accurate. So that will come in time as they get more powerful and as more money is fed into them by the government and other organizations around the world.
I’m curious about some of the factors that play into the sunsets, and if your program can anticipate for those things. Do you notice any trends in the time of year, for instance or the seasons?
See, that’s gonna be interesting, because all the astrodynamics are taken care of for us, but we’ve only had this from the early fall into the early winter. So far it’s been alright, but when we get into the heart of winter, when I think the sunsets are pretty great, it’s going to be interesting to see if we have to tweak the algorithm based on the season. So that’s unknown at this time, but we’re actually looking forward to seeing how the model performs and adjusting as needed.
Right, because the program’s relatively new. When did you guys launch?
We launched about a month and a half ago.
Does topography come into play at all? Because we get some weird weather over here.
Yeah. Topography comes into play and that’s our input into the model data that I get. So the model already knows that you guys are surrounded by water on both sides and that in the west it’s going to have to deal with the Rocky Mountains and everything.
What about urban verses rural settings?
I do not believe that it knows. It’s not a high enough resolution to pick out that, but there are models that do that. Well, hold on, I think that they make note in the model that they change up a couple parameters so I think it sees it somewhat, but I don’t think it sees it high enough. I don’t think it sees it at 100%.
What about pollution? For instance, I noticed California seems to frequently be lit up bright red and I’ve seen the smog layer in California. How does that affect it?
Well actually that is the one variable that we are still searching for data to put into the model. So we don’t have that right now, but we’re actively searching for that and it will be put into the model once we find it. It does well without it, but it can do even better with it. I think that’s one thing that would really improve the accuracy of it. You know, especially with the Canadian wildfires in the summer; they make for beautiful sunsets.
How accurate has the program been so far?
It’s been 80-85% accurate. You know, I just verify it. It has the days that it nails it, and then it has the days that we could obviously do better. But it has nailed many more sunsets and sunrises than it has missed.
What were some of your best results?
One of the best results for a lot of people, and this was the one that first got us off the ground was, there was a great sunset up across the Eastern seaboard in Baltimore, Philadelphia, Maryland, New Jersey, New York. And that was when I still had to run the model manually. So I ran it three hours before and the color scale was maxed out across the big cities in the Northeast. It just really nailed it. And people really started to take notice. At the time, we just had this little fledgling Twitter account and people were like, “Whoa, you guys predicted that?” They were sharing that map and sharing our account. And that was probably one of the top ten sunsets that I’ve seen, and it was probably the sunset that really kicked off SunsetWx.
What about bad results?
Ah. Well, it all depends on the model timing, so model’s data that I get the algorithm from, or if the algorithm processes wrong, then the image is gonna be a bit off. I was actually at school, I go to school at Penn State’s main campus, and it was predicting not such a great sunset. The clouds came out just a couple minutes before the sun had set, so there was just a five minute time period where the sun reached the angle and refracted and everything just lit up in the sky and I took a look and the model and the model hinted at it, but it did not nail it. I had friends come up and say, “Well your model didn’t predict this, but it’s a pretty good sunset.”
Are there any particular Achilles’ heels of the program that you’ve faced so far?
Yes. There is one. If the weather model guesses wrong, then, in turn, I’m gonna process that data. So my math is gonna be off. And that’s a product of the weather model getting bad data to run off of and the weather model not seeing a feature within its equations. So if its garbage in, I’m gonna get garbage out. So if the weather model produces a sub-optimal representation of the atmosphere, well, of course, the image I produce from that data is gonna be off. That is a big problem within the weather model world and people are actively working to fix that.
I noticed on your website you said you were having particular trouble with Florida and the Western Carolinas. Why is that?
I think the Western Carolinas problem is fixed. I had to do with the moisture distribution, especially with water or a tropical environment. So the model sees a lot of water and doesn’t think it will be a good sunset, but it’s a tropical environment and the atmospheric factors are slightly different. But we have made modifications to it that have pretty much taken care of that issue.
I also noticed on your website you have a “case study” section, which was just pictures of sunsets compared to your map. How did that case study work? Did you just round up some volunteers?
That was the work of Jacob DeFlitch and Ben. What they did is, people were tweeting those photos at us. We just went on our Twitter account and asked them, “Can we use this for our case study?” and they said “sure”. And then we asked them where they took the picture and so we just complied a list of images and verified them against the forecast.
It sounds like social media has been a key factor in testing your program.
Yes. It’s been a key factor in testing the program. It’s also been a key factor in getting the word out. The Twitter account lights up if there’s supposed to be a great sunset in the big cities. We get a fair amount from the barrier islands, either on the Outer Banks or near the Outer Banks.
In the future, where are you going with this program? Are you developing an app?
Yes. We’re working on an app development, but that’s really, you know, we all have full time jobs. I pretty much have a full time job as a student. And the three others, Ben and Jake and, I’m working with another person, Justin Lowery, to develop the app. He actually goes to school in Charlotte, NC. So we’re slowly developing an app, and getting ready to go along that route. There’s no promises for a release date or anything. We’re just playing this day-to-day.
What do you think the app will look like? Am I gonna get a push notification that says, “Hey, you should wake up early and watch the sunrise?”
Yes. That’s gonna be one of the features of the app.
What do you think some of the implications are of this? How can people use this technology?
One of the implications to using this technology is to bring tangibility to the forecast. When people view a weather model on the news, there’s all these spaghetti models and that, “Oh, it could go this way or it could go that way.” In the public eye it’s just like, “Well, you don’t know what’s gonna happen.” But for a sunset, those variables are a bit more tame and it allows the ser to see that forecast on the image and then go outside and actually look at it and there it is, right in front of the user. It’s just happening right in front of you. I think it relates the weather forecasts and an element of the weather, because the weather does control the sunset, how vivid it is and everything. So it brings a degree of tangibility and it allows you to bond with the forecast.
Do you see any possible business implications of this? Like people planning their weddings around it or sunset cruises, things like that? Booking services based on the sunset forecast?
Yeah. I mean, obviously those are applications you can get from this. But I’m just your programmer. I have no business experience whatsoever. But yeah, we’ve had landscape photographers plan their days around the sunset and sunrise forecasts.
So what are you learning in school about being a weatherman? People around here love to hate on a bad forecast.
I’m in my sophomore year, so I’m just getting done with the prerequisites. A lot of math and a tremendous amount of physics and calculus and three-dimensional calculus and all these forces in physics and everything. We’re just learning fundamentals so that in the major-specific classes we have those topics already taught to us.
I gotta commend you for that. I barely made it out of calculus alive.
Oh trust me, it’s not a pretty sight.
Well thank you for taking to time out to talk to me then. What’s next for yourself and the project?
Well, I think that I’m gonna work with Justin on brainstorming about the app and everything. And probably refining the algorithm even further. We released a new color scheme for the sunrise algorithm late last night. It’s just attending to and modifying the algorithm and also working on the next step of SunsetWx, which I believe is the app.
Is there any other weather-related phenomenon you’re working on right now?>
Nope. Just sunsets and sunrises. That’s it. — Katrina Leuzinger-Owens
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
LIFE IN (AND OUT OF) LOCKUP
Dare Detention Center’s head explains how our community can create criminals, and how former criminals can become part of our community again.
About 90 percent of the inmates at Dare County Detention Center are locals. That means when they’re released, most will end up right back here, where they can choose to make the same mistakes — or become productive members of our community. According to Allen Moran, a lot of that decision hinges on how they spend their time behind bars.
At 28 years old, Captain Allen Moran may be the facility’s youngest Jail Administrator ever, but that hasn’t stopped him from making an impact. In his first year, the Manteo native’s helped reduce costs by over $200,000, using the money to fund several reform programs aimed at keeping inmates from becoming repeat offenders. Already, the facility’s seen a decrease in the amount of fights on the inside. Moran now hopes to see even greater results on the outside.
“I think, obviously, if it affects one inmate coming out and not going back down the same path that he was, it’s worth it,” says Moran. “That’s one person not stealing from somebody, not being a drug addict, and actively participating in the community and society itself.”
We sat down with the soft-spoken former sheriff just as Hurricane Joaquin was brushing the coast to discuss the role of addiction on crime, how our little local jail differs from big state facilities, and why his real goal is to eventually get fired. — Katrina Leuzinger
This interview was conducted in Oct. 2015 and originally appeared in the Fall 2015 issue.
MILEPOST: What is your exact job title at the Detention Center?
CAPTAIN ALLEN MORAN: Jail Administrator.
How old are you?
28
Wow. That’s impressive. You’re awfully young to be the guy in charge.
Well I started with the Sheriff’s office when I was 20 years old, then six years of patrol, and then I did another two years in investigations.
How long have you been the Jail Administrator now?
Just a year.
Where are you from originally?
Manteo. Born and raised.
What brought you into this field?
I had a good friend who was a Deputy when I was in High School and he started asking, “Hey, you want to come ride along with me?” I think the first time I rode around I was doing a career day piece for my Junior year in High School and so I got in the car with him and he got a domestic call with lights and sirens and from then on I was hooked.
Why did you end up more on the administrative side of things?
When I went into investigations the slot that I took was financial crimes. I didn’t really have a lot of interest in it at first, but it was a plainclothes position and a promotion. You don’t turn that down. So I took it and I came to actually love the financial side of it. And from that when the Administrator spot came up- it’s a lot of financial things. Doing their budget. So the Sheriff came and asked me if I’d be interested in doing the job.
What does a typical day at your job look like?
I come in and check the population. See who’s come in overnight. If we had any incidents, say, someone’s gone to the hospital for medical, or a fight, any incidents. You kind of put out the small fires as you go. And then the rest of it’s just employee management. We have 56 employees at the jail. So that’s 56 lives, all with families. A lot of employee management that comes along with it.
What would you say the function of Dare Detention Center is and how does that compares to a State facility?
At a local facility the majority of our inmates are pretrial. So they’ve been arrested or charged with the crime and the bond’s been set, but they haven’t been able to make that bond for whatever reason so we’re holding them until their court date. We do have some inmates that are serving sentences of six months or less. Whereas a state facility is all sentenced inmates. So if we have somebody for breaking and entering we’ll house them up till their court date. Then once the judge sentences them they serve the remainder of their sentence with the state.
How long are most of the inmates typically in for?
That’s a real big number. That fluctuates. We’ll have folks that stay two weeks with us, and then right now we have a fella that’s been with us for about four years and still hasn’t been to trial. He’s still presumed innocent, but he’s lost four years of is life.
Wow. What’s going on with that guy? Why is it taking so long?
A lot of it comes down to backlog in government, all the way from the judicial system being backlogged and not getting enough trial dates to the state lab being backed up. It takes roughly two and a half years; you know, if somebody gets a DWI and their blood is sent to the lab to find their alcohol concentration it takes about two and a half years to get that back. So if someone’s bonded and they can’t make their bond on a DWI they could theoretically sit there for two and a half years waiting for their trial.
That doesn’t strike me as the most efficient system ever.
No. And the new district attorney we have, Andy Womble, he works really well with us. He came into office about the same time I was promoted so we both kind of reached out towards each other as far as seeing that there was an issue. We have a pretty good working relationship. If we have somebody that’s been there a long time I’ll call him and say, “Hey, this guys been here a long time.” And he’ll push it along to get it through our system. That’s helped us a lot in the last year or so.
How many inmates do you usually have?
An average of about 65.
Has that gone up or down since it’s inception?
It has gone down. It was right about 80 for a long time. It dropped down to 65. And then, for really no reason we know of, last February it jumped up to about 90 or so and stayed there for about 30 days. Then it went back to the 40’s. Now it’s leveled back off at the 60’s.
Any theories on what made it jump up in February?
It was my first winter, but looking back at the local winters it really doesn’t happen. But maybe with the really cold winter. We do have a really large portion of homeless folks here on the Outer Banks. I don’t know if… Obviously, there wasn’t 20 of them that came in, but those that don’t have a better housing situation may have been more apt to stay with us then try to get out.
Do you think the homeless are a big portion of the Detention population?
A lot of the homeless community they’ll come in for shoplifting. I call it petty crime. Shoplifting $10 worth of snack and drink at 7-11. Well they don’t have the $500 to get out of jail, so they’ll sit there for ten days to three months. So what I’ve started doing is once they get there for ten days- which is normal. If they’re going to go into court and plead guilty the max they’re gonna get is ten days in jail. So I’ll wait for them to get there, call the D.A.’s office and try to facilitate to get them their time served and move on. But a lot of those guys, they don’t have the means so they’ll sit there in jail and cost the county money for days and days.
Is that typical? Steal $10 from 7-11- $500 bond?
Well what they do is they put consideration in your criminal history and past actions. So if you’re stealing stuff from 7-11 every three months then your bond will stay higher. Typically, your bond is a reflection of flight risk and past criminal history. They kind of weigh the two out.
Are a lot of people at the Detention Center repeat offenders?
I don’t know an official number, but I would say the majority are repeat offenders.
What’s the typical inmate look like?
It’s funny, because we have to send a number to the state all the time. Quarterly, we have to send out stats and at least every other time somebody will call or send an email back saying, “Are you sure your numbers are correct?” because our typical inmate is 25-35 year old white male. That’s not the norm for most facilities. We stay at about 90-95% Caucasian.
Why do you think that is?
Well I think a lot of it’s our population.
The demographics.
Yeah, I think Dare County’s pretty close to that. But most facilities don’t have that matching demographics.
Is it just the racial demographics that stand out as unusual or the age as well?
I think the age as well. Ours tend to be a little older. I think the typical inmate in other facilities is somewhere between 18-25, whereas ours is 25-35.
Why do you think that is?
I think probably lack of careers and full time employment here. That’s kind of the age where you’re expected to have a career. Here, with the lack of it, I think they kind of loose vision and drive and go in the opposite direction.
What are they usually in for?
Mostly narcotics or related to narcotics.
Selling or using?
A mix of both. You know, back in the 80’s and 90’s crack was the big thing everywhere, and there was one central dealer and a bunch of users. In today’s world pills are a huge thing, and you kind of see where it’s not one specific dealer. It’s whoever has some at that moment and will sell or give some to friends. So I think you’re seeing a lot more folks get arrested and charged for dealing that…they may have been dealing at the moment but…
It’s not their career path. Just everybody needs to make a few extra bucks.
Yeah. And then we see that a lot with property crimes. You see a lot of folks breaking into homes and stealing things or stealing from cars. Since I’ve been in it I think I’ve seen one inmate that- you know, a lot of them talk to me and I enjoy it. I worked on the street for close to six years and no one wants to talk to a cop. But in there everybody will talk to you. And I haven’t met one yet that stole something that wasn’t doing it to support their habit, whatever it may be; cocaine heroine, or pills. It’s all directly related to that.
How does the Dare Detention Center population compare to those in larger cities?
I would say most of our inmates are… I hate to say “innocent”, but “innocent in spirit”. They’re not mean. They’re you typical next-door neighbor, who made a bad decision and wound up in jail.
It sounds like addiction is a reoccurring theme here.
Absolutely. I think it’s the underlying cause of all the inmates that are in there, one way or another.
Are there any programs around here aimed at helping those people before they end up with you?
New Horizons, they’re a counseling program, they have Catisha Bryant who actually teaches a Helping Women Recover class at the jail, but she also teaches at New Horizons. That’s how we found out about them. So we brought her in, partnering with Social Services to provide that class to the female inmates.
Do you ever have issues with overcrowding?
We don’t. We’re lucky. Most facilities do. Our facility has 134 beds and we’re currently around 65. And we’re working with the state to house state inmates for other facilities to relieve their overcrowding, but it also makes money for the county. And we’re able to do it without hiring more staff, without adding cost to the county.
There seems to be two basic schools of thought concerning inmates: That you should lock them up and throw away the key, or put more of an epenthesis on rehabilitation and reintegrating people into society. Where do you fall on that?
I think I’m down the middle of the road. I think there’s a time and place where folks aren’t wanting the help, and if they continue to show that they can’t change and can’t be helped and can’t actively participate in society, then at some point you gotta look at them as maybe being a lost cause. But the majority of our folks are 25-35 years old. They’re young adults that have a whole future ahead of them. We have a number of programs at the jail to try to restart, give them some satisfaction and completion. Recovery Innovations is a North Carolina program. They come in and they do counseling with the men. It’s a three step, three six week courses, and they get a certificate at the end. (The courses) are “Making Changes”, “Moving Beyond Anger”, and “Healthy Boundaries”. They’re all geared around getting beyond the addiction and everyone looking at you as “you’re an addict” or “you’re a criminal” and how they get back into society. The good part about that is, Recovery Innovations, Dave Edmonds is the instructor and he’s an ex-con, so he really relates one-on-one with the guys. It’s neat watching him interact with them. And we now have A.A. and N.A. at for the male and female population, as well as we partner with the C.O.A. They come in and teach an employability class. It’s geared towards getting a job, keeping a job, and also has an emphasis on how to deal with having to check the box that says, “I’m a convicted felon”. You kind of go ahead and address the elephant in the room. I think it’s a great thing for everyone so when they get out they have means. During that class they get to make a resume with the instructor they can take with them when they get out.
I know a lot of places I’ve worked they tick that box and their resume goes straight in the paper shredder.
Right. So it really helps them say, “Yes, I’m a convicted felon, but I’ve changed my life and this is what I have to offer.” And really deal with it by confronting it. It’s a really neat class.
So they’re teaching spin basically?
Yeah. Exactly.
How do you think that rehabilitation impacts our community?
I think obviously if it affects one inmate coming out and not going back down the same path that he was it’s worth it. Any more than one is just extra. That one person going back out into the community and not stealing from somebody and not being a drug addict; actively participating in the community and society itself, there’s no telling what they could come out and do. And the good thing is, Dare County is full of volunteers and resources. I didn’t know half the resources until I started looking into them for the jail. Like the Dare Literacy Council. They come in once a week and teach the guys math and reading skills. Some of them dropped out of school in third grade so they truly don’t know how to read. Just learning how to read has got to be a huge help for them when they come out. We did a- we call it a reentry guide. Essentially it’s a brochure that has all the resources in Dare County, from Social Services to Recovery Innovations to New Horizons to community foundations, all with the name and contact numbers and addresses. And we give that to every inmate as they’re walking out the door. Because we found that a lot of them, when they were leaving, didn’t know these things existed. I mean, I didn’t know any of these things existed, and I kind of think of myself as being pretty aware of what’s going on in the community. You can’t expect them to know what resources are available to them. It at least gives them an option instead of walking out, no money in their pocket, trying to think of how they’re gonna make money. That’s probably the easiest chance for them to go back down the wrong road.
I’m curious, because you said so many people are in for addiction related offenses, how much medical services play into the process. Like, do you have people going through withdrawal when they come in?
Absolutely. We have quite a number of folks that come through that go through withdrawal. We have what we call “withdrawal protocol”. It’s a packet of some medicines and vitamins that- if you come in and say, “I think I’m gonna go through withdrawal” we start them on this. It’s a five-day course of medicine and it downplays the withdrawal. It doesn’t negate all the symptoms, but it keeps anybody from dying. And then we also keep them on medical observation during the five days. We keep them up front, away from general population, and keep a closer eye on them.
So that is something you guys have the capability to handle in-house.
Yeah. We do. And that’s been something that all facilities have come up with their own protocol plans as they went along, because there was no standard procedure for dealing with half your population going through withdrawal.
When did that change?
We started the withdrawal protocol in 2011-2012, so it’s been going a few years.
We talked some already about the rehabilitation programs you have. I already talked the your volunteer coordinator, Carol Hartman, about that, and the picture she gave me is that you had a few programs before, and then you received new funding to start some new programs.
We moved some funding around. We’re doing a lot of medical things in-house. Years ago, we used to, any time somebody had a mental illness we’d send them to Raleigh to the state prison, because they had a psych ward. But we were paying $55 a day just for them to be there plus whatever medical expenses came along with that. So the previous gentleman Dare hired, we’ve kept him on, Dr. Coy he’s a tele-psychiatrist. He was actually the state psychiatrist for state prisons for a number of years then retired from the state and went into private practice. So what we do now is he sees them, all out mental illness patients, he sees them through the TV. So he’s not on-site, but he remotely sees them. We pay him monthly, and we’ve cut our costs by close to $200,000. So the county was gracious enough to take a portion of that and give it back to us to invest in programs for the inmates. And I truly believe, and obviously the commissioners did as well, that investing back in the programs will be a good investment.
What programs did you have before and what were you able to start with these funds?
Before it was just five church groups that came in and A.A.
And the church groups did…?
They hold church and Bible study type class. But now we have five church groups still. We have A.A. and N.A. for both the male and female. We have the females’ Helping Women Recover Class, and the Recovery Innovations class for males, and then the Dare Literacy Council for math and reading tutoring, and the C.O.A. employability class.
Those programs have been going for how long now?
Some of them have been going on for about six months. We kind of shot gunned them; as we got one we’d go and look to do another. I think the first one started a little over a year ago and the latest was the tutoring. We started that approximately three months ago.
What improvements have you seen since these were implemented?
The biggest change that we’ve seen is the lack of aggression and fights between the inmates themselves. We never had a whole lot of violence towards officers. Just typically there’s always been a fairly high level of respect from the officers to the inmates but also from the inmates back to the officers. But in the last year I think we’ve seen two fights between inmates. Before it was anywhere between 20-30 a year. That’s a substantial difference.
Carol Hartman told me that you’re applying for continued funding for these programs.
You know, the county is willing to continue the funding, but I’ve been looking at some grant options, either through the state or the state Health and Human Services board. Just been reaching out to different agencies throughout the state and federal level. Grants for, whether it be funds for the programs that we have or equipment, projectors or computers for the classes, or just materials in general. But this year Dare County is continuing the funding. I don’t foresee any reason for them not to.
So if the inmates are convicted then do they get sent to state?
It’s really a mix. The ones that stay with us for three years before their trial, they’re normally in for pretty serious crimes. Most of them come from families or do not have the means themselves to pay the bond to get out. So when they do go to court, a lot of them get “time served” because they’ve been in for two years or they’ll get “time served” plus additional time. We have one inmate that’s been with us for three years. He was found guilty and he was sentenced to three and a half years. So he’s finishing his last six months with us. If he were sentenced for four years we would have had to send him to Raleigh, because he can only house sentenced inmates for six months or under.
Once they’re released, are most of them back here in the community?
Yeah. The state will try to get them as close to their home county- and when they say their home county that’s wherever they were convicted at- they will try to get them as close to their home county as possible. So say you’re doing a year and a half sentence at state, you may do most of your time at Polk or Green county, but three months before you’re released they’ll try to transfer you if they can to Tyrell county work camp, just for ease for everybody.
You told me earlier about 90% of the jail population are locals. So most of those people ultimately end up living back around here right.
Yeah, and we don’t get a high rate of folks that end up going to the state prison anyway. I would say we maybe send 10-15 a year to transfer to state prison.
What are some of your favorite success stories?
The best is there’s a young lady who was with is. Young. She was probably maybe 18 or 19. Was in for narcotics charges. While she was there she was kind of a mess. She was just full of herself. Never any serious trouble, but always was getting writ up for something. We talked her into going to the Helping Women Recover class and she attended six or seven of the classes and then she got out. The week after she got out, she attended the class on the outside at New Horizons. Which is out ultimate goal; for them to be that interested that they seek it outside when they could easily be going to a movie or hanging out at the beach. Instead, they’re going to a recovery class. So as far as programs and stuff go that’s a highlight.
What about some less successful stories?
We had a fella that we helped. Ms. Hartman, she helps inmates get into recovery programs and rehab facilities throughout the state. She helps them line up places that are suitable for them, whether it be a long-term or short-term facility. And she worked with one fella for about six months to get him to a long-term treatment place. He stayed about three days, got out, and then wound up back here in Dare County and got re-arrested on new charges on the forth day. Full circle.
How do you convince inmates to break that pattern?
My biggest thing is letting them know that you’re just a normal guy too. I try to go down to the housing units themselves at least once a day and just talk with them. Have that one-on-one chatter. If nothing else, just sit down at the table and talk with four or five of them. I think once they see that you do care, that you’re not just talking at them, you’re talking to them, I think that truly helps break through to them.
What can people in this community do to keep their families and loved ones from becoming this sort of stereotype?
I would say the biggest thing is involvement, whether it be family involvement or, especially for kids, involvement in something with structure, whether it be sports or band or drama or church or whatever, it truly helps young people. It gives them not only something to do, but something to look forward to, and gives them a group of friends they can connect with. You know, peer pressure can be good just as much as it can be bad.
What do you see for the future of the Dare Detention Center?
I would say it’s one of the few jobs where your job is to work yourself out of work.
That’s an interesting way to describe it.
Well if you think about it, your whole job is to reduce recidivism, and ultimately your goal is to shut the doors down because you don’t have anybody to house.
That’s interesting that that’s the way you describe your job- going back to the lock ‘em up and throw away the key mentality- some would argue that your job is to keep them in and have them serve their time.
I guess, having dealt with addiction in my own family’s life, that puts a different perspective on it for everybody. Everybody knows somebody or has a family member that’s either been in the judicial system or is an addict. So I think that everybody at some point has a soft spot in their heart for them. But you gotta be soft and steel at the same time.
So where do you think the facility’s going? Is it growing? Shrinking? Changing?
Hopefully it’s shrinking as far as population goes. I think as more services are added in Dare County and more services are readily available to young people and older folks I think you may see less folks in the jail. I’d like to partner with some rehab facilities- try to have a working relationship with them, not only when they’re with us, but have a direct gateway, when they’re released they can go straight into a rehab facility. Not have any down time where they can have second thoughts about going.
Well you’ve got your soapbox here. Is there any one message you’d like to communicate to the public?
I guess it all comes back to, like I was saying, Dare County’s got a huge volunteer base. We are always looking for volunteers, whether it be come in and volunteer your time or if you want to donate $20 to the programs. It can buy highlighters for the guys or buy a book for the women’s class. Every little bit helps. As the story with the girl who went to the class outside, it does touch them at some point.
How would people get involved if they want to volunteer or donate?
Well they can call the jail or call me at 475-9220, or email me at allenm@darenc.com, or mail at 1044 Driftwood dr. Manteo.
Is there anything else you’d like to say?
I think that’s it. I appreciate you doing this.
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Sandy Sanderson has held only two Outer Banks jobs in 40 years. But what he did with those two positions still impacts every level of public safety. As a Nags Head police officer hired in the late 70s, the Moyock native and Navy vet helped train the first EMTs, institute helicopter medical flights and create the whole ocean rescue program — including being the first coastal community in America. to employ jet skis and ATVs. And he took the same approach as Dare County’s Director of Emergency Management: using technology and teamwork to solve problems before they could happen. But with one big difference.
“Once I turned in my blue siren, if you had to call me, we were talking about some major problems,” laughs the 69-year-old Kill Devil Hills resident. “Usually hurricanes.”
A lot of them. Beginning in 1993, Sanderson led the evacuation and recovery for every landfalling system from Emily to Arthur — and all the near misses in-between. Along the way, he helped Dare County earn a national reputation for hurricane preparedness. In August 2014, Sanderson retired, handing the reins to former Coast Guard captain and current director, Drew Pearson. But with the Atlantic experiencing one of the quietest tropical seasons in recent memory, it seemed like the perfect time to ask Sanderson how Dare County handles disasters. So the next time a storm has us in its cross hairs, we know what to expect — and how react.
“That’s what Emergency Management is all about,” says Sanderson. “Making sure that you’re getting information into the public’s hands so they can make good decisions. After that, it’s up to them.” — Matt Walker
This interview was conducted in June 2015 and originally appeared in the Issue 4.2
Can you spell your name for me?
Nathaniel is my given name. I’ve been going by Sandy since I was 4 years old.
How old are you now?
69
Where are you from originally?
My home is Moyock. Up in Currituck. So I’m not far from being a native.
How did you end up here then?
It was a roundabout way. I went to high school in Currituck, obviously. I graduated from Knapp High School in 64. From there I went and served in the Navy. I came back from the Navy in 1972. I went to Old Dominion University and got an undergraduate degree in criminal justice. And at the time I was commuting back and forth from Moyock, because I had a place to stay for free rent. I was living off the GI Bill, commuting and working part time jobs. But I got a job with the fire department there. Emergency medical services was just getting its foot in the door at the state level. I became an EMT, and then an EMT instructor, CPR instructor, that sort of thing. When I finished my degrees at Old Dominion, I started looking for a job. And I ran into the city manager of Nags Head — the first one Nags Head had — at an Emergency Medical Services Regional meeting. We got to talking about jobs and things of that nature and he said, “Would you be interested in a job in Nags Head as a police officer?” And I said, “Well send me an application.” And from there I was hired in Nags Heads in ‘76, as a police officer, with the understanding that I would teach EMT classes to the police officers. And that escalated into teaching more classes in the county. So I was the first EMT instructor in the county.
So that’s how I got started in Nags Head. And I stayed there until ’93. And I moved from that position into the emergency management position. So I’ve only had two jobs in 40 years. So I’ve been very fortunate.
So, when you want to Nags Head, did you head up all emergency response stuff?
No, back then, it was all volunteer — except for the sheriff’s department who ran ambulances in station wagons. And they finally graduated to being EMTs. Bascially they were just sheriffs deputies who picked someone up and carried them up to Dr. Charlie Wright in Harbinger. From there it escalated into a paid service. But I never was in charge of any kind of EMS service except helicopter operations when we started the helicopter operations. And I was charged with training people flying on the helicopters through East Carolina School of Health.
When was that?
I started the helicopter in 1977.
Is that when we got one? Or did they send one?
The then Sheriff, Frank Cahoon, got a surplus helicopter from DOD in ‘73 or ‘74. And they trained several sheriffs deputies as pilots, but it truly didn’t have a function. It was here, they could use it — it was a B Model Huey helicopter like the old Vietnam era helicopters. They hired a trained Army pilot who was a reservist, or National Guard, who became more involved. And I finally went over and said, “Hey, I have Vietnam experience, you’re a pilot, we can transport these serious patients in that Huey a lot quicker than we can over ground.” About the same time, Outer Banks Medical Center was opened. It was next to where Britthaven is now in Nags Head. That was our first official medical center on the beach. Dr. Horton was over on the Manteo side. But Clarence Skinner was the administrator then. And we said, “If you build a helo pad out in front — which is still there if you go look at it — we can land and take patients to wherever a lot quicker than you can transport with the station wagon ambulances we’re using now.” And we did. And that involved training people to ride in back. At the time, we were only able to train up to an EMS intermediate level, but we were able to set up basic life support, stabilize the patient and transport them. And most of them either went to Chesapeake, Norfolk or Elizabeth City. Elizabeth City was a 13-minute run and we would land right in front on the grass in front of the hospital.
And would you fly with them, too?
Yeah. I was their main tech in the back.
How busy would you be in the summertime?
Well, in summertime, we’d go out three or four times a week.
So it definitely came in handy.
Oh yeah, we saved a lot of lives. We pre-dated Nightingale by about a year.
Wow. I bet the choppers looked different, too.
They were flying Bell jets and we had the old B-model. They were a little hesitant about starting our own service until they realized we were taking all our patients to them. So we were saving them a lot of money and they were reaping the benefits of our high-dollar patients. Because we were only taking our most severe patients out of the clinic that needed immediate attention. So they were getting the heart attacks and head injuries and broken bones, and all the things that were happening down here. And we became friends after that.
What was your exact title when you retired?
Director of Emergency Management.
That’s obviously a different role
Entirely different.
So how’d you end up there?
Well, in my career I’ve been a lifeguard, I’ve been a police officer , I’ve been a fireman, I’ve been an EMT. I’ve been all the thing that you would think an emergency manager would have a background in. So when they offered that position, I applied and was fortunate enough to get the job.
And that was in ‘93. Was that when they created the position?
Oh no. Before then there was George Spence, who was the local emergency manger, and then Buddy Shelton came along. And I replaced Buddy.
I’m assuming things have changed a lot since when you came in and left. Or is still the same basic function?
Well, emergency management function stayed primarily the same. You’re charged with ensuring the evaluation and protection of the county that you’re responsible for — for all hazards. So, there’ a lot of plan-writing. A lot of interaction with the state and FEMA to ensure that all the plans that are in place to support the state and FEMA response are maintained and updated and that the information is current. Along with responding to serious disasters. When I got the job, I turned in my blue-light siren and got into my regular car. If you had to call me for an emergency, there were some major problems. Fire departments and police departments handle all the local responses. The emergency manger was responsible for ensuring that you’re prepard for hurricanes, tornadoes, flooding — those kinds of problems. So I maintained our emergency operations center. I made sure that it was staffed and had the necessary equipment and was able to sustain itself during a disaster.
So when thing shit the fan, that’s when your job kicked.
When we are declared a state of emergency then emergency becomes the lead agency within the county and it provides information to all the other municipalities and our supporting agencies.
So you’re in charge.
I’m the go-to guy. The overhead responsibility still belongs with he chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the county and the mayors within the municipalities. But they’re looking to emergency management as a guide. And I’m the guy who collects all the information and intelligence and supports them.
So when you do start implementing your role, then you deal with the firemen and police and such, so being on that side of the equation for 20 years has to be helpful because you were on the ground.
I knew what they needed. I knew what questions they should be asking me. And if they weren’t asking me, I was able to provide them with the input they needed. That was the kind of luxury that I had with the background I had. Local knowledge is the key in any kind of emergency response — the ability for the person who is there inside the operational theatre to recognize the problems that he incident is going to create.
You need to be able to predict what’s coming down the pike. Even 20 years later, we’re a much more modern society. 1993 was pre-Internet, pre-drones, pre- webcams. What was it like when you first came on?
We were just getting into computers — what was it, 84, 86 when computers were coming in. I think DOS was the program of choice that you could use. So that was just becoming a part of technology for emergency management for public safety. But we tried to incorporate that into the emergency operations center as we developed our response capabilities. So technology is a big part of the evolution through my 20 years in emergency management. Being able to bring that technology in now an capitalize on what it can do for providing real time information and getting it front of not only the decision makers but the public. So now we’ve transitioned into having cameras all over the county so you can see the road traffic to having social media to where you are instantaneously questioned about everything you do. The media has capitalized on that, so now they have access to everything and they want access to everything that you do in regard to whatever the situation may be.
So that has become an area you have to address, and we tried to do that as best as possible. Through our public information officers. Through our IT department. and it’s a challenge because technology changes — what? — they say every 18 months something new comes along to replace whatever was previous? Government can’t work that fast. We have to buy according to a budget. And we may turn over technology – if we’re fortunate — every three years. But usually it’s every five years. The technology that is out there, the tracking programs, the software, typically you are able to purchase that on a yearly basis and it will be able to satisfy the needs you have for 3 or 5 years. So that’s a challenge: keeping up to speed on the technology and the ability to utilize that technology.
What was the first hurricane you had to deal with?
Emily in 1993. And prior to that, we had a winter storm. I hadn’t been here 10 days. It flooded all of Manteo. It was a huge snow storm in the wet and up north . And it went all the way from Florida up into Maine. That was my first presidential declaration. It was of a state of emergency and out of that it became a federal emergency for all the county and the states involved.
And after that, Emily came along toward the end of August. And that was my first hurricane here as an emergency management person. Emily was a category 3 that approached Hatteras and veered just offshore about 20 miles — the eye of the storm. So we probably got 110 mile an hour winds in Hatteras up to about Oregon Inlet. it was fairly severe impact for that era. And we go t another presidential declaration out of it. It took us a while because were the only county that was seriously impacted. I know we initially asked the governor to make the request to the president and the first attempt was denied. And we had to go back and reassess our damage to get more dollars. Because a percentage of your tax base is used as part of your determination of your presidential declaration. So it took us ten days to two weeks to get our presidential declaration — which frees up dollars, is what it amounts to, to help citizens get back on their feet.
So FEMA money.
Exactly.
Describe the atmosphere at the time as you saw this thing coming up the coast. Were you nervous?
Well, certainly your first hurricane. Back then we were just beginning to utilize radar that could be used to visualize the eye of the storm as it was moving toward you. We were just beginning to use the hurricane tracking program — called Hurrevac — that FEMA produced. So that was a big help in identifying the track of the storm and looking out 72 hours, which at the time was as far out as it would project the track of the storm and its intensity. But it gave us a pretty good idea. So we had a full-blown evacuation for the county and from that we were able to ensure that everybody had plenty of times to secure their properties and get out for those that wanted get out.
You said you had a 3 day update. Now we there’s a 5-day projection where people can at least feel like they know what’s going on. But at that point was there a magic cut-off point where it was like, “Ok, we have to evacuate”. Describe the tension when it’s like ”Everybody leave.” Especially in July, when I’m sure there’ s pressure to say, “Don’t everybody leave.”
There really isn’t. Because we’ve developed what I call ‘the rules of engagement’ that we go by. We have certain points that we follow for determining if we’re going to have an evacuation and what that evacuation involves and how it evolves. One, we evacuate for all hurricanes. If at 48 hours, it looks like the track of the storm is going to impact anywhere in Dare County, that will trigger an evacuation.
So that’s Cat One or above.
All hurricanes. Anything 74 miles an hour or above we’re going to be making the call. That is a trigger. Every evacuation is a mandatory evacuation. We try to make sure that we start our evacuations at early daylight. So in the timing scheme, that means if it looks like it’s going to make landfall a day ahead of time from that 48 hour period then we’ll back up another day to ensure everyone has time to get out. We know that it take 18 hours or so to get people off the island. And that gives us a full day of travel. Usually during the time you have hurricanes, you have some portion of daylight from 5am to after 9pm. So you have a wide window of opportunity there to ensure that people have time to get out.
And once you‘ve made those determinations — and once you’ve seen what the hurricane is doing and the track it’s forecast to take — it becomes relatively easy to make the decision. We have the tools now that can show us and demonstrate to us that we’re fairly comfortable with and that give us the information so we’re comfortable in making those decisions.
Every once in a while, you’re going to get broadsided by a hurricane — Mother Nature being what she is. Felix, in ’95, probably would’ve been the worst storm that we had had in years because it was coming perpendicular to the coast. And it was projected to make landfall somewhere in the Kitty Hawk/Southern Shores area. at 110-115mph. And that is the worst-case scenario for any kind of landfalling storm is coming right straight onshore. You’ve got the right side quadrant winds that are going to impact the coastline, dramatically.
So what did Felix do? Felix shot off the coast about 200 miles and stopped —I mean, just flat stopped right there — because of a high pressure system, a front that was moving down. And w knew it was coming at is, but we didn’t know the timing. So went ahead and made the declaration for an evacuation just for the safety factor. I mean, you’ve got 300,000 people down here that you can’t take a chance on whether or not she’s going to stop. She may stop right over the Wright Memorial Bridge.
But luckily she stopped offshore and stayed there about 24 hours before she moved northeast. And so the only thing we got was a little bit of rain — and some great surf. So those are the kinds fo things that will complicate your decision making. But if you stick by the rules of engagement you’re going to err on the side of safety. And that’s what Emergency Management is all about: making sure that you’re getting information into the public’s hands so they can make good decisions. Because what it all boils down to is an individual decision on the part of the person who is impacted by whatever that threat may be. And in this case it’s hurricanes. So we try to put the information in front of you, so you can make a good decision.
How often to the people who live here make good decisions? I know we’ve yet evacuate.
Why is that?
Well, the only big storm we’ve had to deal with the past 10 years is Irene. And we boarded up and hunkered down.
Irene would’ve been the one you should’ve left for.
Probably. But I think the general consensus is we’re more prepared here. People who go inland seem to get stuck for days with no power. It seems we recover faster and hold up better. I don’t know why…
Good emergency management. [grins]
You’re kidding, but we do have better codes. And we’re more used to the storms. Why do you think people don’t leave as often?
We have had multiple attempts to try to determine what the factors are that keep people here. And it runs the gamut from “We don’t have any way to take care of our pets” to “we don’t have money” to “we don’t have a place to go.” But the biggest one is, “I won’t be able to get back.” Which, when you think about it: How crazy is that? I mean, if you feel like you need to leave. And you’re threatened, but you won’t leave because you can’t get back? Then you’re just, to me, telling the world, I’m dumb enough to sit through a hurricane. Because what we’re trying tell you is, “It’s not safe for you to be here in hurricane. And leaving is your best opportunity to save your life.” And you’re telling me, “I can’t leave because I can’t get back.” [laughs] but that is typically the answer I get from locals. “It’s too hard to get back.”
You have to have had these talks with other places. I’m sure you go to emergency management conferences where there’s guys from VB or Florida. Is that a coastal thing? Or is it an Outer Banks thing?
No, it’s a universal thing for the people that have been impacted by a hurricane. You go down to the Keys and talk to year round residents there — the Conchs, so to speak — and they’ll tell you the same thing. “We ain’t leaving because we know we can’t get back.” Or “I’ve been here 3 generations and my family has never left. Or “We’ve been through three hurricanes and never had any problems.” Those are the kinds of answers you get from the locals. And hat’s unfortunate, because every storm has it’ own characteristics. And every track has its own determining factors on the damage potential. A good example is Arthur. Arthur was a Category 3 hurricane. It came ashore south of us as a Category 2 . But it was moving so fast it didn’t cause much damage, really. Most of the damage was south of Oregon Inlet.
It was like stripe. The tri-villages took it all.
And it moved through so quickly that it really didn’t cause any damage down there, other than a brief, high soundside [flood]. So people think, “Oh, Category 2, Arthur didn’t cause any problems.” But the next Category 2 could be slow-moving, 8mph hurricane , and that’s going to cause some major damage. Because it’s moving so slow, you’re gonna go through probably 2 or 3 high tide cycles and it’s going to build storm surge that will crate the flooding that you saw during Irene. We’re fortunate here in that you will probably never see a Category 4 or category 5 hurricane this far north. Hazel was probably Category 4 as it came shore at the North Carolina/South Carolina line. And it caused significant damage — an 18-foot-high storm surge as it came it at that area. And it wreaked havoc all the way to New York. But the 1s and 2s with different characteristics can cause some major damage to the Outer Banks. And you have to realize you live on a barrier island. You’re living on a sand pile. Mother Nature could care less about Dare County or the outer banks. It doesn’t even recognize the Outer Banks as a land mass. It could care less.
So you have to think about that. I think a lot of times we lose track of that thought and we’re becoming very complacent in our attitude toward the hurricane threat. That concerns me and it has for a long time. We’re losing our protective barrier, frontal dune system. Yeah, we’re gonna replace some of it with a beach but not a dune. And if you get that perpendicular storm that Felix represented and it makes landfall somewhere in Nags Head, Waves, Salvo— it’s not the skinny black line you’re worried about. It’s everything on the righthand side for about 50 miles. It’s going to impact the coastline dramatically.
You look at Katrina and what it did to New Orleans. What you don’t see is what it did to Alabama and Mississippi. It devastated that area. They’re still recovering from Katrina. They had a storm surge down there of, I think, 25 to 27 feet. Yes the beach configuration is a little different, the bottom profile. The ocean is conducive to higher storm surges. But that’s what could happen to us. If that does happen, because we have a reluctant population, you may see some dramatic loss of life. Certainly the potential for it. Especially on Hatteras Island.
I think people see forecasts as gospel. We’ll make fun of the weatherman for being wrong all day long — until he tells us what we want to hear.
Well, hurricanes, you have prepare yourself for the hurricane. And usually it take you 24 to 48 hours to do that. And hurricanes can make that shift. I know before Hurricane Floyd I was in the National Hurricane center in Miami at the time. I was part of what they call a hurricane liaison team. And they took local emergency managers how’d been impacted by storms and took them to the hurricane center to talk to local emergency managers that looked like they were going to be impacted by a hurricane. As Floyd developed and came across, they felt like it was going to be a Gulf storm. So they activated the guys on the East Coast to go to the hurricane center to talk to the people in the Gulf. I’d been down there two days when the director at called us into the office and said, “Fellas, I think you need to go home. [laughs] It looks like this storm is going to track up the coast or right into Florida in the next 4 hours.” So I packed my bags very quickly. And actually, the storm followed me home. I got here in time to open the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) in Manteo and activate our control group and decision makers and bring them up to speed and activate he decision to evacuate. I don’t think I slept for three days. It was just bam-bam-bam. But that’ show fickle a hurricane can be. The best minds in the world — which is the hurricane center — often get fooled about where the track of the storm is going to go. But everyone on the East coast evacuated for Floyd. Because it came up and turned and moved up the shore off the coast just enough for emergency managers to make that decision to evacuate for safety. So the roads were just clogged with people. I-95 was a bus stop. You couldn’t move because of the evacuation.
And eventually it came ashore somewhere around Jacksonville, NC. or Wrightsville as a strong Category One with a lot a rain. Lots of rain. And we’d just had a storm previous to that that dumped a lot of rain. So we suffered from the rainfall. But the people inland really got the brunt of the storm.
I remember stories of animal carcasses coming down the Neuse river.
Princeville was under water — 64, right there at Princeville — was under water. For us it was a rain event. We did evacuate but we didn’t have any problems. Yeah you had trouble getting back because you couldn’t get here. Because if 64 is closed you’re going to have problems on other roads. It was the first time I had 168 closed coming out of Northwest. Lake Drummond, which is west of 17, had overflowed and was creating — along with the rainfall — a blockage along 168 coming into Northwest, a little community on the Virginia line. So that road was compromised for a brief period of time. So literally we were cut off from the world, transportation-wise, for a short period of time. It didn’t cause any problems, really. But that is the fickleness of a hurricane. And that’s what we’re alluding to, really.
The information that hurricane center is providing is getting a lot better. It gets better every year. They’re dumping a lot of money into improving their forecast window. That cone of error is shrinking. And now they’ve extended it out five days. Intensity levels are still something they’re trying to figure out. They’re going into storm surge prediction now. There will be a watch/warning for storm surge. I don’t know how that will impact decision making for the coastal communities. Storm surge is a product of wind, especially off the ocean. The higher the wind, the higher the storm surge. We always look a t wind as a determining factor as part of our evacuation decision-making process. I think they’ll now have to incorporate storm surge prediction.
And lots of times that’s the more damaging part.
It is the most damaging part and the most loss of life occurs from drowning from storm surge. But in your mind you have to think about what are the complexities about what generates the storm surge. And that’s the wind factor. So you want to intermingle the two and not differentiate one from the other. It all boils down to, “Am I at risk? And how great is that risk for me?” From that you can make a decision, hopefully, that will push you to evacuate given where you live in regards to the landfall of the hurricane.
When you went down to the hurricane center, what would you tell those people? What information would you give them?
Well, you become a government agent then, so you can’t reveal a whole lot. What they were typically looking for is: Where is the storm in relation to where I am? Where is the storm going? And what is going to be the impact? And we would take the position of the storm, extrapolate the storm out to 24, 48 or 72 hours and give them a pretty good idea of what the storm surge was going to be and the impact. Whether they’d be on the left side or the right side of the storm track, and try to help them in that regard.
Is it pretty uniform for most counties to pull the trigger to evacuate in 48 hours?
No it isn’t. Look at Tampa for example. Tampa has a huge population. They probably need five days to effectively evacuate that huge population. Same thing with New Orleans. For all the negative things you hear about what Katrina did to new Orleans, they did a fairly good job of evacuating the number of people that they moved – more than 200,000 people. That’s no easy task. Believe me, it isn’t. So what we try to take into consideration is each area has an understanding of how long it takes to evacuate their area of responsibility. Each emergency manager understands that. So he’s computing that into his timeline when he’s doing an evaluation for a storm. Where the track is and where it’s moving. He’s factoring that into his decision-making process. Now we’re at the point to where we can do it in 18 hours. So we want 48 hours to make a decision. That gives us a fudge factor of maybe a day. A person in Tampa or even the Tidewater area has to consider extending that timeline — probably even by 2 days because of the population density and the road infrastructure they have for an evacuation. It plays into our decision-making process in Dare County, Hampton Roads does, because they have a road system that affects our evacuation. Probably 70% of the people who come here come down 158 through Currituck. And they’d like to go out the same way they came in. Now if Felix, for example, was to threaten, I feel like there would be a Hampton evacuation. And they would have to make that evacuation decision at 4 days — 96 hours — for portions of their area. That would affect our decision-making process because we’d be moving our traffic into their traffic, which causes more of a back-up. So what we have to do is anticipate that. We have conversations with the Tidewater area every time we have a storm threat.
You talk to their Emergency Manger, I assume.
We do. So we try to get a feel for what they’re going to do so we can anticipate that and expand our timeline if we have to. We also have another plan in place if they say “Okay, we’re going to have to shut down our evacuation corridor to 158 traffic because the volume is to heavy.” So then we have to implement a plan to send everyone out through Elizabeth City and 17 and hit 95.
Irene, that was one of the concerns — or maybe it as Sandy. But a lot of people saying, “Virginia’s gonna stop traffic on 158.”
There is a plan in place to do that.
It sounds cruel. When you hear that, it sounds like a big, “Screw you people. We’re getting ours out first.”
But the reason behind it is you don’t’ want to have traffic on the highway if you have a storm approaching. The goal for Emergency Management is to have everybody out of the area by the time gale force winds – 40 mph winds – affect you. So we want to push everybody out and give them plenty of time. If you were to not implement a plan to take the people off the Hampton roads area, then those people are likely to be stuck in a storm somewhere. Because it just becomes a bottleneck. You can’t move. There’s not enough time to get people out safely. So that’s why we have a plan to do that. We also have a plan to reverse the traffic from Kitty Hawk at a certain point and say, ‘We’re going to send you out 64,” if it got to the point where everything is backed up from Barco to the beach. If for some reason we got stuck in an Hampton Roads evacuation and we could see that traffic’s not moving on 168. So we send you on 64 toward 95 — or to Raleigh to go west.
Part of this just a larger population density on the coast. It’s not just here, but in the US. In some ways, we’re lucky, because there’s not so many options to play with. But on a larger level, the more populated the coast gets around us, there’s a whole ‘nother level of planning.
Well it broadens your perspective on the potential for the problems that it creates. So at your planning level you have to anticipate your timing needs.
And I guess, it means you have to be prepared to keep pushing back the timeline. So it sounds like a lot of “if thens” — if this is the situation, then we have to do this.
You do. You have to look at the problem area. But it still comes back to individuals making their own decisions. Fortunately for us, our huge population base — which is our visitors — will leave. We have no problems with the visitors at all. We put the flags up for evacuation and they’re gone. It then becomes our 30,000 people who live here year round and are very hesitant to evacuate. And from Oregon inlet north, it seems like nobody evacuates.
Really? I’d think it’s the opposite. You always think about them as being the hunker-down types who dig in their heels.
Well, there’s a group of people down there who’s been through enough hurricanes they say, “I don’t want to go through any more of this.” So percentage-wise, I’d say 35% or 40% people down there who leave. But there’s 5000 people down there year round, so that still leaves about 3000 people that’re gonna stay. And they’re the ones who’re going to be the most vulnerable and have the most potential for loss of life. And those are the ones that concerned me. And it’s a concern for management now. “How do you get them to recognize that we’re doing this to save your life. We’re not doing it because we’re mean and nasty.” Here is the information we have. This is how deep the water is going to be. If you’ve been through Irene, you should know what he consequences of a major storm are like. Do you really want to go through it again?
Or Isabel. I think about Isabel. When you have an inlet cut through your island.
Isabel in Hatteras Village was a huge problem. Irene it was a huge problem for the TriVillages. So you’ve witnessed the problems you can have. Even if you survive, you’ve lost your road, you’ve lost power, you’ve lost the ability to cook. You don’t have any law enforcement, you don’t have any fire protection, you don’t have any EMS service. Yeah, you do have a link back and forth — that’s a ferry — and that will be put in place, but you’ll have to survive pretty much on your own until we get help to you. That could be three days, that could be five days, that could be three weeks.
But they do it. They go through it.
And the ones who live down there now understand the circumstances because they’ve been through it as bad as it’s probably gonna get, with Irene and Isabel. They can see what’s happened.
What’s the worst thing you’ve seen?
I’ve been rather fortunate in the fact that over 22 years, we never lost anyone in a hurricane. Nobody’s ever died from an actual hurricane landfall. We’ve had people die from doing stupid things after the storm. But as far as a hurricane killing anybody, we have not had anyone. Isabel was probably the worst as far as the damage that we saw and potential for loss of life. And then the recovery process pushed us to the limits to be able to support that village. If we hadn’t put the emergency ferry system in place, it would’ve been astronomically more difficult. If we were to lose that, if you were to get a situation where the ferries couldn’t operate, you’re back to “how do you support that population?” The only way to do it is by boat or by air, and that reduces your ability by some level.
For us, we rebuild on our own little level, but for the county it’s obviously exponential. So its like you deal with a crisis situation, and your day-to-day stuff at the same time.
Oh yeah. Emily was a prime example. We had to deal with the crisis from Avon south, really. But everything north of that was business as usual. You still had to provide the garbage pick up and county services and everything else that had to be open and running for people north of the bridge. Fortunately, just before we had Isabel, we signed a debris management contract. FEMA allowed us to sign with a private debris hauler. So we could dedicate our manpower to doing county things.
So it’s three stages: before, during and after. What takes the most planning? What’s the biggest headache?
For us, for me, it was after the storm. I’d always kid max Mayfield, the director of the National Hurricane Center: “Max, you don’t have any idea what it’s like to be in a hurricane. All you do is tell me where the storm’s going. When the storm hits you’re done. That’s when my work starts.” [laughs] And it typically, if we have a major storm — an Isabel, an Irene or an Emily — then my work really starts after landfall. Because we’re doing damage assessment. We’re positioning ourselves to recover. So if you get a presidential you’ve got all the FEMA and state people coming in an doing assessments. You’ve got a population you’ve got to support. You’ve got logistics, logistics, logistics.
The other part of our situation is when we lose NC 12 and we go into our emergency ferry operation, then we become the manager of that system. We being the emergency manger. We have to prioritize who gets on the ferry from the fuel hauler to the medical emergency to the doctors appointment to the wedding we’re having. All those thins become important to somebody. But there’s only 600 cars we can take on that ferry every day. No matter how you cut it. So who goes? and that becomes our problem.
And it’s a source of frustration for people. I’m sure some understand, but…
Well the fact is for a lot of the businesses it’s business as usual. They feel like they can go get in line and do their 9 to 5 job using the emergency ferry. And they get upset when they don’t get priority to go fix a commode in a rental house. So yeah, it creates some problems. Even at the state level. I think it was Irene that took the road out in Rodanthe and we were balancing – because we didn’t have power. The generators went on line for providing power to Hatteras Island but they needed fuel. And they were eating something like 18,000 gallons of fuel a day. So that’s three tractor trailers loads of fuel that had to go down there every day.
Wow.
So we said “ok, we can do that. but fuel trucks have priority.” At the same time they’re trying to fix the highway. So we’re dispersing all that with asphalt trucks. And you can only take something like 4 asphalt trucks on a ferry. And you can only take one fuel truck on a ferry. And you can only have something like 20 people on a ferry with a fuel truck — by law. So you can take a fuel truck and like two cars. And that takes that ferry out of business. So the other ferries were taking asphalt trucks. So you could put four asphalt trucks on a ferry that carries 40 cars. So that becomes a huge problem trying to get the services over there that want go but you have to disperse those with the needs of the road and getting the power going. it can get interesting.
Tell me about the control room. What goes on in there? Are you locked down?
Usually at five days I bring in support room staff, I’m briefing the county manager, I’m bringing in social services, health department, public information officer, public works, sheriff, EMS – the key agencies that are going to play such an important role in not only the evacuation but the aftermath. The support group has about 30 different agencies and they’re either department heads or the outside agencies, like the park service or highway patrol or state DOT or ferry division. They’re all part of that operation. And they play a key role in the managing of a response. So at five days we’re in there with those key personnel so they’re monitoring the track of the storm and talking to their key different parties. So everybody’s on the same page. And at 72 hours if it looks like the storm is going to impact us, I bring in the control group, which are the mayors, the sheriff, chairman of the board —– and they make the decisions. They’ve been getting information by fax or email already, but now we’re sitting at a table eyeball-to-eyeball and I’m briefing them up on situational awareness. Giving them timelines, giving them options. For example, if it moves this direction we don’t have to do anything, if it moves this direction we need to do something in the next 12 hours or 24 hours. So that gives them an idea of what their response is going to be. And now they can go back to their different jurisdictions and make their plans. Then at 72 hours or right after we’ve made a timeline, we’ve determine if the track continues on we’ll be back at a certain time and make decisions. There’s usually only 2 or 3 meetings with the control group before a decision is made. And they don’t stay there. They go back to their respective municipalities and make their plans. But they know now they’re in the cue and there’s a timeline established. And if nothing’s changed, we’re back around the table, to make a decision, evacuation starts at 6am the next day.
Can they push back? Does anyone ever say, no? Is there debate?
It’s fairly obvious. Using the tracking system we have and the parameters that we’ve established, if they all agree to that — okay, this I the way we’re going to do busienss — which they have — then it’s pretty cut and dried. We come in, we look at he information, we look at the track and if it meets the criteria, it’s “Let’s go.”
Anyone ever freak out?
No. Not really. We’ve done it a lot of times now. Fortunately the county has a lot of experience that’s still there and will continue to be there. And it’ll carry them on.
You see pretty calm and even tempered. You probably need that mentality. But it does seem like when one is spinning, there’s an energy that picks up an people start to spin a little.
Well, in the back of your mind, you know there’s something that’s going to affect you adversely and you need to stay on top of it.
Do you get the same buzz when it kicks in? Or is it old hat?
Not really. There’s so many things going on in your mind and people you’re talking with that have to understand what you’re doing. Dare County sort of drives the train for the area as far as our preparedness. And I’m talking to every county around me. I’m talking to not only Hyde or Currituck, but Pasquotank, Perquimens, all those counties that are affected by my decision because it’s an evacuation that’s going to affect them. So we’re all communicating multiple times before we make that decision.
Is it pretty cooperative? Do counties ever butt heads?
No. They see the potential problem. Hurricanes are a fairly large animal. So when they see the scope and magnitude of the threat, then okay, we’re gonnna prepare ourselves to do what we have to do. It’s not like you can snap your fingers and it’ll go away. Nobody says, “Is that really a hurricane? You’re pulling my leg.” The threat’s obvious.
What about evacuation/reentry process, I’ve heard stories of conflict between towns, where KDH wants to open, Kitty Hawk doesn’t. Is that really the case? Or is that even your call?
It becomes part of our reentry process. Municipalities, for the most part, cannot stop reentry on main thoroughfares. Their only responsibility is on the secondary roads. But 158 is a state road. And it’s operated by highway patrol. So unless there’s a physical impediment that causes the road to be closed — for example, when thers’ a serious overwash at the Kitty Hawk Post Office. When that happens, 158 is obviously closed. But Kitty Hawk can’t just say, “There’s too many damn cars on the highway, the road’s closed.” They can’t do that. Or if we want to close the road going through Southern Shores and Duck, we can’t do that. If the road is open and Corolla says, “We want to have people,” we can’t close that and restrict that.
I remember that during Irene, people said “Why are they opening Now? why not let the locals get their lives back together before they have to go open houses?” But I guess if the road is open, the road is open.
Well, it’s the different industries that will take that positive or negative spin. The realtors are an interesting group because they want people to come back in as quickly as possible. But they don’t want them to come back in too quick, because they’re not ready to handle them. I’ve had it go both ways. Corolla got really upset one time because they wanted the road open and physically the road was closed. Right there at Barrier Island the road had washed, out and there were rocks and debris. But Corolla wanted it open. So we quickly fixed the road and opened it. And as soon as the people started arriving, Corolla said, “No, we don’t’ want ’em. We’re not ready! We haven’t had a chance to clean the cottages.” Because the people hadn’t been able to get up there to clean or do an evaluation or to see if water had leaked in the windows. So, they didn’t think through the problem. They knew the road was closed so they thought, “We need to get people in.”
It’s a catch 22, really. This place is filled with more Monday morning quarter back. Is that just part of the job?
Oh yeah. Social media just eats me alive. They say, “That Sanderson, what is he thinking? Why won’t he let people back in? The water’s on, the power’s on, the road’s open.” But it doesn’t bother me one bit. The thing I learned a long time ago is: once you evacuate, you don’t run back in. you walk back in. very slowly. And that means you check for infrastructure —well the first thing you do is you’re looking for life safety. Treat the injured. Find the dead. But simultaneously, you’re checking the roads, checking to see where power is off. Do you have EMS, fire support, law enforcement support? If those things are lacking, you can’t support any population other than what’s already there — and you can’t really support that. But you certainly don’t want to let more people back in. And you certainly don’t want to let visitors back in, who haven’t a clue as to what the problem is.
Sometimes we’ve been a little reluctant to let the residents back in a timely fashion, with regard to their mindset. They feel like they should have an instantaneous ability to return: “The wind’s died down, I want to be able to go back home.” Well, if the wind’s died down, but I can’t get you back home because the road’s closed or you don’t have power, then I don’t need to put you there. Because then I have to support you. And I can’t support you. And I think the public, at least the local public, doesn’t really comprehend the complexities of trying to support a large population. And it’s a balancing act. But we don’t have the type of infrastructure where I can immediately open the doors and support people. I’ve got to get help from the state and the feds in order to support – fed is the biggie. Food water, power that sort of thing.
What’s your take on the Weather Channel?
They’re fun to watch.
Do they help, do they hurt? Are people more informed, really, or do they just think they know it all?
Where do you get your information?
I go to NHC, NOAA, Wunderground — Jeff Masters. I call my friends at Surfline. Do you know them?
Oh yeah. I subscribe to Surfline. They’re on my computer. There is some good information on the internet now, as far as letting you know there is a system out thee you need to be aware of. The biggest thing that any of these provide you is an early warning system to say, “there is a system in the Atlantic, it looks like it is tracking toward the east coast, I need to start paying attention to the weather.”
I mean, the Weather Channel gives you a fairly good synopsis of the situation as it develops. Do they overblow it? Oh, heck, yeah. But I like to think Jim Cantore and I are fairly close. Because we’ve known each other for 20-some years. And I have had occasion ask him to come to Dare County. Because they don’t like him here, but he’s effective when he’s down there. And if I have a situation where we need to evacuate Hatteras Island, I’ll ask Jim to go down and there and he can get on the air and tell people what the situation is and that they need to evacuate. He reaches millions of people. I mean, people watch him. That’s the beauty of Jim Cantore. They watch him. and I use his help in that regard, and I think it’s been helpful to have him down there.
You’re right. If you’re trying to scare people…
If you’re trying to get to as many people as possible, that’s a conduit I use to do that. We’re using social media now. We have a twitter feed. I think with the new emergency operation center that we’re building, you’ll see more of a public information visualization of what the storm is doing, the consequences of that storm and the impacts it will have on our community, visually.
So almost like a local TV broadcast. When will that be completed?
2017.
What about long-term forecasts for a whole season? Colorado State’s been doing that for 20 years now. NOAA’s started doing it. What do you think about those?
I don’t really give them a whole lot of credence. I mean, one storm kills us. One storm in a season and we’re done. So it’s nice to know that the potential for having that storm is diminished if there’s only a chance for 8 storms. If the total is 20, then the percentage goes up for me having to work. So that in my mind, is the only benefit I get out of that information. But I think Colorado State has given an extraordinary amount of time and attention to the overall workings of climate and the impact it has on our weather. Their predictions? Until you can tell me where a storm is gonna landfall, they do absolutely nothing for people in my position.
Do you think they do a disservice just by lowering people’s readiness levels?
Maybe for the general public. But for people like me, it doesn’t make any difference whatsoever. I’m still as prepared for an 8-year storm potential as I am a 20-year storm potential. And I think you’d get the same response from anyone with the same responsibility as a coastal manager.
How much is planning and how much is improvisation?
I have a readybook of everything that can possibly happen to you or me during a storm event from five days out until long-term recovery.
How big is that book?
That part of the book is probably 30 pages. But it covers everything I should be prepared for things that I have noted I should do.
Have you ever been caught off guard, like ‘Man I should’ve thought of that?
There’s always something that will be different that you didn’t expect. Most of it’s kind of off the wall.
What’s the weirdest thing you didn’t expect. Obviously the inlet being cut is a new affair in some degree.
I think it’s the expectations of people after a storm. Why they cant get back in, or why you cant tell me if someone’s house is destroyed? Or how deep is the water at such and such a house at the end of a cul de sac on Sir Walter Raleigh drive? Why can’t you tell me that. But people are just being people. They’re curious, they want to know things and they want to know why you don’t know those things.
What about technology: what do you see moving forward? Is it cameras? Drones?
I think the technology that will do us the most good is what the hurricane center is working on in terms of intensity. They’re trying to diminish the cone of error to the point where we can diminish the evacuation geography. Because of the influx of the population on the coastal areas, we have a huge problem in defining who we need to evacuate. And if we can reduce that then so much the better for us. Barrier islands it won’t effect that t much, probably, but the inland populations — large coastal inland populations — it will help them tremendously.
The ability to provide the public with real time imagery on how deep the water’s going to be at my house, is huge. Because you’ll then be able to tell that person who’s in that house, what my response is going to be. That guy who’s thinking, “I’ve been here 30 years, and I’ve never had a storm cause water come up more than 2 feet.” Well, now I can show him a picture. And it’s 6 feet deep. And it’s gonna happen in 24 hours.” So real time imagery is gonna be our next huge asset in trying to get the pubic to recognize the threat. And that’s coming. In fact, its probably already here in a lot of different areas.
Drones are going to be a good after action capability. To be able to do very definitive assessments — where damage is, potential damage — and do it very quickly. Right now we get overflights. I was bombarded with information after Isabel. From NOAA, from Sea Grant, from National Guard. From Army Corps of Engineers. Even from the Red Cross. They all did overflights of Dare County and gave me the information to look at. Was it helpful? In a kind of a cursory sense it was. We knew where the damage was — we had people out there. But the National Guard did it at night with an infrared camera. But dummying it down to where I can use it would be the next step.
What about long-term stuff. The potential for storms to get worse between climate change or sea level rise?
That’s really a problem that’s over my head. I respond to and plan for disasters. Is sea level rise going to increase the potential for a disaster? Could be. But I already have a plan in place for that disaster.
What’s the worst disaster you’ve got planned for? Is there a doomsday plan in there?
No. Most of the plans respond to a hurricane. Now, situations being what they are – and society being what it is –disaster planning for terrorism response has become a very prominent part of what we do now. And the random shooter —someone who just walks in with a gun and starts shooting people, that’s’ another huge planning scheme that we’re deeply involved with and concerned about. Can it happen? Yes. it can happen here just as easily as it can happen in New York city. So I think everyone has an understanding about what situational awareness can be. But because we don’t have an occasion to respond to that like we do hurricanes, we don’t know how we’ll react.
Which explains why we do pretty well with hurricanes, because it’s the one we have the most practice with.
Yes. It is. And we are looked at as a leader in being able to manage disasters – hurricanes primarily. I mean, I can do a hurricane for the back of my car. Give me a cell phone and a radio and I can sit here and run any hurricane that you can throw at me. But that’s the beauty of having that experience. Because I know what to expect and who to call. It’s just a matter doing it. What did that baseball pitcher say? “It ain’t bragging if you done it.” [laughs]
The downside is we’re reluctant to leave, the good side is we’re willing to help.
We do have a very good community. We’ve got a very good Interfaith Group, which incorporates all of the churches and faith based organizations. They’re a hard working group and have been prominent in getting back on our feet. And we get good support from the state, so in that regard we’ve been fortunate.
I think most neighbors are willing to help each other too.
And the other thing we have going for us is the municipalities have good organization. The fire and law enforcement is very community oriented. They;’re out here in the community and helping you out. You hear some people criticize them for their individualism– why don’t we collaborate and have one fire department and one law enforcement organization? – but you would lose that community involvement if you did that.
You did Ocean rescue work as well, correct?
I was charged with creating an ocean rescue operation in Nags Head when I came here. So I started the beach patrol with four-wheel drive, with radio communications, and with jet skis. We created the beach patrol mainly in Nags Head, but it expanded into Southern Shores and Kitty Hawk. We were the first ones to use Jet Skis. First to use ATVs. The first to have litter capability in the back of a suburban. You could take someone off the beach and to an ambulance.
What year was this?
‘77. Actually, ‘76 was the first time we used jet skis.
So who else was doing that in the US?
Nobody. Huntington beach was looking at them to incorporate them into their operation. I read an article about it in Sports Illustrated or something. So I wrote those guys and asked them ,for an evaluation and what they were using them for. And they didn’t like them. But Huntington Beach was 100 years ahead of us in terms of rescue operations. They were using boats and paddle boards and all these other things we could only dream about.
The biggest concern we had was, one: getting a a lifeguard to a situation in the water. And two: transporting that person off the beach. We didn’t have any stationary stands. We didn’t have anything other than that 4WD vehicle with a lifeguard in it to cover 11 miles of beach. So it becomes a force multiplier to be able to put a jet ski in the back of a 4WD to offset the lack of lifeguards. If he was sitting on the beach and got a call 4 miles down the beach, he could launch a jet ski and be there in 2 minutes and effectively make a rescue. We had was Hobie cats and sailboats and rafts getting blown out 2 miles . Before he jet ski, you called the coast guard. If they had a helicopter available it would take them an hour to get here. And that’s the upside. It was four hours at times. Or they’d send a duck from the Oregon Inlet coast guard Station. And that could take an hour and a half. So the jet ski solved problems. I could go out and have a tuber back in under 2 minutes. That solved a lot of our rescue problems. We got into rip currents long before sea grant. We did the first poster for rip currents in Nags Head 35years ago. Because we recognized that rip currents killed people. We were losing 8 to 10 to 12 people in Nags Head every summer.
We were able to expand the program and hire more people. And we put them on ATVS instead of building stands, because I could cover 3 miles per ATV. We didn’t start adding stands until we had certain places identified for larger populations. Bonnet Street was the first one – because of the parking lot. When they started building parking lots that was when we recognized that’s where beach populations would go. And we added stands to those areas. And then from there, it’s grown.
What’s the most pressing challenge moving forward?
Maintaining our level of service. Budgets are being cut. People are not being replaced. Trying to ensure that we stay on the technology lead, get the information out to the public. Utilize the latest and greatest. Being able to generate the necessary information to young people and older people. That is a huge challenge. We’re in that we don’t have a huge diversity in our population. We have Spanish speaking people, which we’ve addressed, but we don’t a huge multi-lingual challenge in our population. We don’t have Vietnamese, Italian, or the challenges you see in other areas or large cities.
Obviously Drew Pearson’s got the job now. He’s a coast guard captain?
Drew Pearson is retired coast guard captain. Started out as C-130 pilot. Spent quite a number of years in Elizabeth City, so he knows the area. Elevated to a position where he couldn’t fly airplanes any longer. And went to Miami as the OPS officer down there and then when he made Captain he was the sector commander for Group San Juan. So all of the Caribbean was his responsibility. So hurricanes are nothing new to Drew. He’’ been through Katrina and helped clean that up. So we’re blessed to have someone with his experience.
Does he have the ready book now?
He’s got the ready book. And we’ve gone through it page by page. But if you live on the Outer Banks, you’ve got to prepare for hurricanes.
Anything else you’d like to say?
No . Anything we can do to get the information in front of the public is beneficial. It’s hard to maintain a steady stream of information. It all helps us.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Nothing is set in stone. Remember that whenever you’re dealing with the National Park Service — or any federal agency for that matter. Legislations update. Lighthouses move. Leadership changes. Last year, after almost a decade of rocky community relations and contentious debate over access issues in Cape Hatteras National Seashore, the Outer Banks Group was ready for a fresh face. In December, we got one: David E. Hallac, a biologist and former resource manager for Yosemite, who’ll now oversee the seashore, along with Fort Raleigh and Wright Brothers National Memorial.
“I love community relations issues,” says the New Jersey native and lifelong fisherman, whose prior posts include the Dry Tortugas and Everglades. “Being in the science world, there’s certainly interface with the public, but not as much as when you’re the figurehead for the local organization. So I was just excited about being Superintendent, knowing I could work with a variety of different stakeholder groups and really help build those relationships.”
He sure got what he wished for. Within days of his hire, Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) — which included an amendment ordering the Department of Interior to revisit the 2012 ORV ruling and “modify buffers and corridors of the shortest duration possible.” Thus began a hectic first few months on the job, as Hallac and his staff researched the latest science and reached out to all various interests to beat a mid-summer deadline. On April 29, they proposed a “preferred alternative” that not only suggests buffers shrink — by as much as half for vehicles two-thirds for pedestrians — but proposes hiring more human monitors that could keep a single nest from blocking miles of beach. The key word being “could.”
“It’s impossible to predict how species will behave and what might happen in years to come,” says Hallac. “We don’t want to set up expectations that this will create immediate changes, but it certainly has flexibility to make things better for ORV and pedestrian access.”
If it happens at all. At press time, they were still taking public comment in order to issue a final decision on June 16. And while the new tack is far from a complete reversal of course, it certainly shows a welcome willingness to bend. For our summer issue, we sat down with the new boss twice this spring —once in mid-April, and once the day after the April 29 release of the environmental assessment — to discuss the potential ruling and what more flexibility might mean for the future. What follows is the complete transcript of those interviews. — Matt Walker
Part One: interviewed April 13.
MILEPOST: I’ll start with the basics. What’s your exact title?
DAVID HALLAC: Superintendent of the Outer Banks Group, which is Wright Brothers National Memorial, Fort Raleigh National Historic Site and Cape Hatteras National Seashore.
Can you give us a quick bio: Where did you grow up and how did you end up here?
I grew up in New Jersey, just over the George Washington Bridge, so real close to Manhattan. We first started going to the beach in summer at Long Beach Island. And then we graduated to Cape Hatteras National Seashore. I can’t remember what year we first came down, but we ended upcoming for many, many summers. And we would almost always go to Avon and rent a house very close to the beach there and just have a blast — surfing and boogie boarding and fishing. So I have a lot of great memories of being on the Seashore.
But I went to college and graduate school at the University of Vermont, and spent many years in Burlington — which is a great place to be. And then I ended up moving down to Florida. We lived in Florida for about 12 years. I did a variety of things, including working for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and then the Everglades and Dry Tortugas National Parks. And following that I went to Yellowstone and spent three and half years there, managing their resource management science division, which was an amazing experience. And I have the pleasure now of working as Superintendent of the Outer Banks Group.
So how does that work: is it like the military where you get assigned a position? Or do you say, “Put me in?”
The Park service, just like all federal agencies, announces jobs on a website called USAJobs. That’s how we hire all our positions. And I saw it come up on USA Jobs. I applied for it, got interviewed and was very fortunate to have a job offer.
So you wanted a change of pace, because Yellowstone is obviously a different world from here.
Yellowstone is amazing, and I miss it to some degree. But I was very much looking for the opportunity to be a Superintendent. And one of the things I love now — and one of the things I was looking forward to working on — are the community relations issues. So being in the natural resource world, the culture resource world, the science world, there’s certainly an interface — a nexus — with the public. But not as much as when you’re the figurehead for the local organization. So I was just excited about being the Superintendent here, knowing I could work with a variety of different stakeholder groups and really build those relationships.
So did you know what you were getting into?
Oh yeah.
Because I’m sure it’s like any industry, there’s a buzz about different offices or locations.
It is. And there’s no question, that Park Service wide, if you mention Cape Hatteras, people understand that there have been issues here with off-road vehicle management and a divided public — and that it’s certainly a contentious and classic resource preservation versus access issue. It’s pretty well known for that. So, yeah, I was familiar with it. And certainly I had read newspaper articles about it so I think I knew what I was getting myself into. And I can say that after three months being on the job, I’m generally seeing what I expected. And people will make comments like “You’re a glutton for punishment. Why would you want to get involved at a park service unit that has that much contention over all these issues? Where you can barely step away form your iPhone or your computer or your landline without getting yelled at for something somebody feels you’re not doing right?” And although, as park managers, we can certainly be frustrated by all that input sometimes, I can tell you — definitively — thank goodness we have people that care so much. Regardless of what side of the equation they’re on, they care so much about national parks that they’re willing to weigh in — they’re willing to spend their free time, and sometimes their money — and they’re passionate about these special places. I’m thankful for that.
But because of that passion, people are quick to assume the worst. I’m sure when the early nesting began a few days ago, the phone started ringing off the hook.
It’s interesting you mention “quick to assume.” And it’s fairly well known that in the absence of information, people fill that void with whatever they want to fill it with and then rumors get started. So one thing that’s actually a priority of mine — and it’s difficult to do these days — is to improve communications. And it’s difficult. On the one hand, we have a lot more tools at our disposal to communicate — Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, the website. On the other hand, because there’s no longer one way of communicating — reading it in the newspaper or just seeing it on our website — it’s hard to keep up with all the levels of communication and places we can get our message out. We’re doing our best trying to provide regular information about a lot of different things. But some of these topics, people are so passionate about them that if we’re not communicating enough for them, they can fill the void with information and we just hope it’s factual.
I met with the Cape Hatteras Angler Club folks. They were very nice. They invited me to dinner for one of their monthly meetings two or three weeks ago. And one of the things I’d told them is I’d read some blogs online — bulletin boards — I don’t know if it was Red Drum Tackle, but that’s one I tend to read. And I actually read it because I’m a fisherman and I want to see what the fishing reports are. And we had just sent out a press release indicating that we were implementing our pre-nesting closures. And almost all of the comments on there — and on Facebook — were “earlier and earlier every year.” And there were long discussions about how every year these pre-nesting closures come earlier. And I said to myself, “I’m really curious if our pre-nesting closures are coming earlier.”
So, I went to our website. I clicked on “news” and I scrolled back to 2009. And what I found was that every year from 2015 to 2009, I believe the pre-nesting closures were implemented within 7 days of each other. And in at least half the years, the closures were implemented earlier than the pre-nesting closure in 2015. And the press release went out earlier as well. So what I stressed to the Anglers Club was, “We respect your right to disagree with us or be angry with us. That’s the public’s right. But before reacting, please come to us and ask questions before you form your opinions.” Because what you’ll find is a lot of stuff you’re reading on Facebook or one of the fishing bulletin boards may be based on information that’s not accurate.
All that can make it harder on the people who live there at times, I’d argue. I know people who still think all of Hatteras is closed because that’s all they hear.
It does. And in some case, similar to the NIMBY issue — not in my backyard — there’s also a “not in my favorite place” issue, where people tend to support certain things as long as it doesn’t affect them personally. We support the protection of these species or that species, but I also need to get to that place because I’ve been doing it for a long period of time. And I’m in no way am I minimizing that as a concern or issue. Because it’s important. We’re human beings. We have a culture. We have traditions. People have been going to places with their family and friends for a long, long time. So that’s no less important. But it is a factor. And it’s important for us to understand that.
So you were hired before the defense budget that made the changes?
Correct. I believe the Defense Authorization Bill went into affect on the 19th of December. I got the job offer in November, but my first day on the job was the middle of December. So I was hired before that was passed.
So what went through your head?
What was my first reaction? Well, it was one of mixed emotions. Number one, we finally had a plan that was passed in 2010. And I know everyone’s not happy with it, but it had been implemented. And people were finally getting used to it. And now it’s time for us to potentially redo that plan. And I thought that could certainly cause some flare-ups in terms of reigniting a lot of those passions — which is a good thing — but also the anger that was part of the planning process. So I definitely had some concerns there. On the other hand, the Congress and President of the United States passed and signed this and I looked at it as an opportunity. The reality is we going to do a five-year review following the 2012 ruling anyway and a lot of what we’re doing, the Defense Authorization Legislation will basically fast forward some of that work.
So you’re re-evaluating the buffers, you’re re-evaluating the corridors — all those things. And that’s basically what it’s requiring you to do by the end of the year, correct? But you don’t necessarily have to modify them. Is that right?
Here’s what the language says in a nutshell. And we’ve broken it down into two parts. The first part says the Secretary of the Interior shall review science and modify wildlife buffers in accordance with peer-reviewed scientific data to ensure they are of the smallest size and shortest duration. Now, some people have seen that and joked — although, maybe not everyone is joking — “Well, they may need to be bigger.” Because if we have science made available since the old plan was made that says that, we’d have to consider it. But I don’t think that was the intent of the legislation. It’s fairly clear the intent was to make things smaller and to grant additional access.
So that was Part A of the first part. Part B of the first part is that the Secretary shall designate corridors around areas that are closed because of wildlife buffers, and will let you get from one open area to another open area. And as you know, sometimes some of our wildlife buffer may be on a section of ORV beach where get off on a ramp, and head north or south, and hit a buffer and now you can’t get to — in some cases — 75 % of a beach that is technically open. So the intent of that Part B, as I describe it, is to find ways get around that problem. And some of that will happen by ways of additional ramps and roads that we’re building and that we always planned to build. But part of what was in the legislation, as well, was a directive to the Secretary to accelerate or expedite those construction projects. And we’re doing that. And all that we just talked about was due within 180 days.
June 16, right?
Right. The second part of the legislation was a little bit different. It says to review vehicle free areas, consider the seasonal ORV routes in front of the villages. I think the intent there is to see if we can make those open earlier in the season. Currently they’re open from November to April. And the legislation wants us to make it a broader window. And then also to look at the nighttime closures and the morning openings to see if we an open the beaches earlier. That’s a little less prescriptive. It doesn’t have the 180 day timeline and it specifically prescribes a public process. That being said, we are going to have a public process for the first part. And the next few weeks we’ll be looking at posting some draft ideas of how we will make changes to he wildlife buffers and how we’ll provide corridors around closed areas. And we’ll get the pubic reaction.
So that will happen before May 24?
It will happen between now and the middle of May.
Do you have any ideas what that will look like? You’ve seen the science, do you have a working idea of the options that you will ask people to weigh in on?
We’re going to actually say for all the different species that we currently have buffers on. So to give you an idea, when it comes to piping plovers, when they have chicks on the ground we have a 1000-meter buffer around those chicks. And right now that traditionally completely closes access to Cape Point. What we’re doing is looking at all the science we can find — the foundation of our work by the way is relay robust scientific review and our regional office has helped a lot with that — just to know all the best science that we have that would tell us whether or not something may or may not be a good idea to help protect those species. And we’re going to see if it’s possible to make that existing buffer smaller. So we’ll actually have a proposal in there for what that buffer might be. So stay tuned.
You can’t give me a sneak peek of what hat might be? I think it might be smaller?
I think folks will see some proposed changes.
Gotcha. No sneak peek. Well what is your take on the science so far. Then. you’re a biologist right? I know people on the ground certainly think it was heavy handed, maybe even a little bit skewed.
You know, this is really hard. This whole issue is. People love the beach so much I love the beach so much — people are used to getting where they want to go for years, and years, and years — if not decades, being able to drive wherever they wanted to go. So that passion is there and it’s so important. But then you start to look at the Atlantic Seaboard and how much habitat is currently available for seabirds and sea turtles. Some of these species have special status, they’re federally or state listed. And when you start to look at what their needs are and how much habitat is lost and you look at some of the science there was science that supported the buffers that went into place. Now whether or not we chose buffers of the smallest size and shortest duration, I would suggest we didn’t necessarily do that. That being said, it’s fairly unusual for National Park Service unit to say, “Let’s choose the minimum amount of protection necessary to protect a species or resource.” That’s not consistent with our policies or defining principles. We usually look to find protection that is very robust. So, I very much respect the work that was done in the initial plan and I think it was clearly rooted in science. Where it was on that spectrum on providing protection versus access? I’m not in a place to judge that. That being said, the Congress of the United States has asked us to take another look to see if we can make those buffers smaller and of shorter duration and we’re doing that.
It’s interesting. I’ve always thought of the people of Hatteras as being under pressure from larger forces — Audubon and the Park Service, or just Mother Nature and outside population. But it sounds like you’re under pressure, too: from Congress, from interest groups, the public. Is it a constant balance of trying to please some group. Or in this case, a coastal issue. Because what happened over the past 50 yeas, isn’t just that Hatteras is facing increased pressures — but the rest of the coast is as well.
No question. There are a lot of pressures from a lot of different sides. In this case though we come down to the three tiers of decision-making that we try to stick to. And that is that we make sure we have the best available, sound science. And that the decisions we’re making are faithful to law, regulation and policy. And that the decisions we make are in the best long-term public interest. So those are the three legs of the stool. And it can be hard to balance all that. That being said, the Park Service’s mission, the policies, are fairly strong and easy to understand. So they serve as good, guiding documents.
I’ve always said that the whole purpose of the Park Service was to be unyielding — to have pungi sticks out on long term issues. Because if all you had to do was say, “This is bad for me now” there would be no park land left, because there’d always be justification for removing a restriction.
Exactly. And that is the challenge of the park rangers — to look at the big issues long term that are looming out there. Trying to not only a make decisions that make sense for today, but make sense in five years, 10 years, 20 years — in some cases, that may set a precedent for 50 or 100 years from now. It’ trying to really think along all those time frames and make good decisions. It’s challenging.
Do you think by June, you’ll be able to make some changes — assuming there are some — or do you think it’s more like next season?
Given that we haven’t even released the EA or given a chance for the public to weigh in yet, it’s too early to really say whether or not changes could be implemented this summer. If we decide to make a change and make a decision on June 16 that we can change a buffer —and we can do it this summer with the resources we have, that is something we’d consider doing. There may be changes we recommend or wish to make but they require additional resources we don’t have at the time. In that case, may not make it until next summer. In either case, it’s really too early to say.
You mentioned resources. Does the law give you any more funding at all to implement changes or to make these corridors?
Not that I’m aware of. I don’t see anything in the defense authorization bill that authorized any funding. It makes it challenging, but it’s all a matter of priorities. Obviously this was a priority for the National Park Service to take the legislation seriously and give it our best shot. So we’ll have to see the degree to which we feel additional resources are necessary. But I think what folks will find as we move forward, that some of the new ramps that we’re building and trying to expedite, that we’ll take certain pots of funding that have not gotten any bigger, and reprioritize the use of those funds. Maybe take some other things we wanted to do — for example some deferred maintenance projects — a parking lot or something else we wanted to do in 2016— and say we’ll do that project in 2017 or 2018. And we build a ramp. For example Ramp 32, which will be in construction this summer — we’ve done exactly what I just said to build it more quickly than before. And by having two ramps on a particular stretch of beach, if there’s a nest in the middle that blocks access, two ramps open up new possibilities to get around those areas. You can drive a mile or two down the road and get out on the beach.
But it’s not immediate. And people want it that fast. And I was interested in the shortfall. In a previous conversaiont, you said you’ve got $9 million dollars in funding, and $15 dollar operating budget. Are most parks in that situation? And we don’t have an entry fee either. Is that normal? And how does that affect these decisions?
Good question. I don’t know if there is a normal. There are more than 400 NPS units and they’re all very different in the way they receive income. When I was at Yellowstone , in the division I worked in, I got over a million dollars a year just in donation funding. And grant funds were probably more like $2 million. So it varies among. But you’re correct. We get $9 million in federal funding appropriated to us, but our budget — what it takes to run the Outer Banks group, the three NPS units — is more like $14.5 million. And that comes from a variety of different funding sources. Everything from climbing the lighthouses, to the entry fee at Wright Brothers to a Rec.gov reservation fee for a campground. So it’s challenging to cobble all that together to make it work. But we certainly do it. But you’re right, it’s interesting. Cape Hatteras National Seashore gets a lot of visits — we get well over 2 million visits every year. And it’s totally free. And that’s amazing.
And 80% of it stays on site right? If someone pays to go into Wright Brothers it stays at Wright Brothers?
Eighty percent stays in the group. We can use it among the three parks. That being said, we tend to use the funds that were generated in one location to go back into that unit. And we have pretty strict requirements when it comes to the collection of fees. To give you an example, Oregon Inlet Fishing Center, that’s a concession operation. And they pay a concession franchise fee to us. And there are very strict guidelines on how we return those back into the park. It needs to benefit the visitors and patrons that come to use the concession, meaning the Oregon Inlet Fishing Center.
You don’t use that to build Ramp 32.
Exactly.
That money comes to from the ORV pass. That reminds me of a comment I saw “The NPS will keep it closed until vacation season is over. (Less park to manage=less staff/budget).” But it sounds like the other way around.
For example, the ORV program, we sell about 30,000 permits. Two thirds are weekly permits and a third are annual permits. And we generate about $2 million a year. And there are no strict guidelines around that, but our intent is to spend it back on projects that relate to ORV management in the park. And that’s what it’s spent on. As a matter of fact, we posted a spreadsheet that shows what we spent that money on. As a matter of fact, I got a phone call asking if someone needed to file a Freedom of Information Act request to get those numbers, and I said, “You can, or I can just tell you.” So we worked up a spread sheet that shows how we spent the $2 million and show it’s transparent and so people know how the money is spent.
But it’s still not enough to do everything you want to do as fast as you want to do it.
Definitely not. If you look at the 2010 ORV plan, following that plan, we said there were a whole bunch of a different additional access projects for pedestrians and ORVs. 29 projects, and the cost of that compendium of projects was almost $8 million. So even though we have $2 million coming in, if we were to spend every penny of it, it would take at least 4 years to compete. And we can’t spend every penny on just that. We also use that money for monitoring activities, law enforcement, the cost of the collection itself. We’ve made it an extremely convenient system for customers who want to buy a permit. Our permit offices are open 7 days a week. All year round, it’s expensive to make it that convenient. A lot of money has to be used for the cost of collection. So we don’t have all the funds to do all the projects we’d like implement. But that being said, we’re making great progress. And after you do a project, you have to maintain it— that’s expensive, as well. But I think we’re doing well and we’re making great progress and I think you’ll see very shortly as we roll out our EA, we’ll roll out our expedited construction schedule for all the projects that will be put into place soon. And that’s exciting.
And by the time people read this it’s sitting online right now and they can get the latest news.
Yes.
Private donations. You said you got $1 million for Yellowstone. I’m scared to ask: is there a culture of giving here?
We get thousands of dollars in donations. We have donation boxes in the visitor centers. That funding does no make a significant portion of our budget That being said, we do get a big donation from Eastern National. They’re the ones that run all the bookstores and gift shops. And they’ve provided us with a donation every year that’s often over $100,000 dollars which is a portion of their revenues. And that’s extremely appreciated. And it helps us do a lot.
But not like Yellowstone. Here, I think there’s appreciation for the resources, but they’re also taken for granted to where people will give 20 bucks to help firefighters but the feel the park service is supposed to be free.
I can’t speak to the local culture. But a lot of programs have Friends groups. And we have a First Flight Society at Wright Brothers. And we have the First Flight Foundation — and they’ve made lots of donations. They’ve done amazing things to help with the up-keep of the facility. But when it comes to the Seashore we do not have a friends group. I would love to have to a friends group for the Seashore. Parks traditionally have friends groups and they tend to bring folks that want to stay connected to the park unit they love. And they often have philanthropy as a major piece of their organization. It’s not uncommon for the Yellowstone Park Foundation to raise $5 to $6 million dollars a year for the park.
Wow.
We don’t have that. And a lot of people who make those donations to Yellowstone Park Foundation, they’re a mixture. They might be local folks in Jackson, Wyoming or Boseman, Montana. But they’re also people from all across the country and the world who just love Yellowstone. They may have second homes. Or they may have just gone and had an incredible experience and they want to give back.
That’s amazing. Because it seems like this is such a coastal drawing point. It’s amazing there isn’t more of that. Part of that is some resentment. I’m sure people in Hatteras would will read this and say, “Give money to the Park Service? Over my dead body!” But if there were restrictions loosening, maybe there’d be a thawing. Especially if they can get more access with more funds.
Could be. It’s just hard to know. And there are a lot of people who aren’t happy with the way the seashore is managed because of the ORV management. But we also have two to two-and-a-half million visitors who come to Seashore very year and we don’t get a lot of complaints from them. People who are visiting Waves, Rodanthe and Salvo, we tend to hear people who are very happy. They rent a house. They go to the beach. They may drive, they may not. But a large part of those folks are on the beach every day enjoying the resources that have been here for generations. So there are a lot of different groups who have different experiences, attitudes and perceptions about Cape Hatteras Seashore and different levels of willingness to support.
Have you talked to all the user groups. Have you noticed any thawing at all?
I’ve talked to a lot of user groups on all sides of the equation. Like the Cape Hatteras Anglers Club, the North Carolina Beach Buggy Association, the CHAPA folks. I’ve spoken to folks from Audubon, I’ve spoken to folks from Defenders of Wildlife, the Southern Environmental Law Center, Surfrider, almost everybody that had a willingness to speak to me. And I want to talk to everybody. I want to hear peoples’ ideas, their perceptions, their concerns. What I’ve found is everybody has been warm. They have been professional. They have been constructive. I haven’t met with many people that have just started attacking the seashore. They usually say, “We have a concern; here’s what it is.” And they offer up a solution. And I really appreciate that. And a lot of the local groups are well-suited to offer those constructive ideas because the live here and they’ve been here for a many, many years and they know the place really well. And we realize that.
Is it basically just numbers? You can’t have the same rules for a 1950s population or 1980s population as you do from a 2000s population?
I think the park service realized that they needed to have a solid reasonable way to manage offshore vehicles on the seashore, and I think they found something that was pretty balanced. And actually, the more that I read the plan, there is something in there about carrying capacity. Just how many vehicles can you have on a seashore? And I’ll tell you park service units wrestle with that across the country: how many people are too many people? To the point where now, there’s so many people that the overall experience is being degraded and the resources are being degraded. And I’ll tell you that’s a tough number to figure out. But we address that to some degree with the plan we have. So I think we put the plan into place and considered a lot of different tissues, everything from resource protection to access for variety of different groups to carrying capacity. A lot of different considerations.
It’s funny. When you think about it, the Seashore was pitched a tourism draw. And its’ been successful. The Outer Banks Visitors Bureau data says the number one reason people visit the beach. I’d argue Cape Hatteras was the original draw. But moving forward, you’re setting yourself up for an issue you can’t control: how do you encourage people to visit and still manage the resource?
And it’s a balancing act, because if you exploit too much the ability for everybody and anybody at any time to use the resource, the resource becomes degraded. And that original draw, that original thing that was so special for people to come to see, might not be so special anymore. That being said, if nobody can access it and enjoy it then one of the principal reasons for being is gone as well, and also people that get to enjoy national parks and the resources they protect, tend to be some of our best supporters.
I’d argue that, long-term, you want people to visit the park. You need humans to protect these areas because turtles can’t hold picket signs or pressure legislators.
You do. And that’s a pretty good segue to talk about the centennial, which is really exciting. August 2016 is the 100th anniversary of the National Park Service. And to me it’s an incredible opportunity to reconnect a younger generation of U.S. citizens and people around the world with the National Park idea. To get them to understand that there’s more beyond the iPhone or video game they’re playing. That these things are out there for them to enjoy and protect and to bring their families to. And that really encompasses a lot of what the Centennial is about is to connect and reconnect with this new generation of park supporters and enthusiasts.
Have you noticed a drop? Does the data say fewer people are visiting?
I’m not sure of the total number [for all parks]. We have pretty good visitations, but it has trended down a little.
Too many old people? Is that the problem?
Just to be clear: everyone is welcome at our park units. But knowing that there’s a younger generation that may not have connected with the park system like the baby boomers, there is an initiative to bring them into the park. An example is that is a new initiative called Every Kid in the Park. They’re going to try and give every 4th grade student in the US — and their family — a chance to visit a park. And more than just national parks. It could be a preserve, public lands, a state park — but they want to do this between 2015 and 2016. And that’s awesome to have the park service and the Department of Interior and the government overall backing this initiative to try and get every fourth grader on to a piece of protected land. I think that’s a feat. Because sometimes those early memories turn into a long-term passion for individuals. And I think that’s a great example of one of the things we’re doing to try and get people here.
In our case, that applies mostly to the Wright Brothers because that’s the one that has an entry fee.
It does. But there may be initiatives to get folks to the seashore and spend a day with one of our interpretive rangers. You could do an educational program on the ecology of the intertidal zone or something similar on the sound side. Talk a little bit about the history of the area, talk a little bit about coastal geomorphology and sea level rise. In some cases, we’re sort of a national laboratory for studying all these coastal processes. And one thing we’re going to try and do from an educational standpoint is an initiative to make this more than a one-year event and try to connect more with the urban centers — whether it’s Raleigh or Norfolk or Virginia Beach — and find ways to bring those students down to Seashore. It’s almost their backyard. And talk to them about the amazing resources we have. And get them to understand more about these special park units and also have fun.
A couple things you’ve mentioned before that sounded interesting was a kayak trail?
The park service has a series of Call to Action Initiatives. Number 12 is called Follow the Flow. So this particular project, under the umbrella of the Centennial, is all about establishing water based access and establishing paddle trails in the Seashore. So we’re looking at four new paddle trails with designated launch sites, so people can use stand up paddleboards, kayaks, canoes, whatever they want to do to experience the seashore on the sound side.
And the International Night Sky designation was another one.
In that case, we have Call to Action Initiative Number 27. It’s called Starry Starry Night. We want to lead the way to protect the natural darkness and the dark night skies in this region. And we’re pursuing an International Night Sky Designation. We have a lot of work to do there — to retrofit hundreds of lights to make them turtle friendly, as an example — to do a lot of things. But anyone who’s visited the seashore, I hope has had the opportunity to walk out on the beachfront on a dark night and look up at the sky and see this incredible world that’s beyond the planet earth here. It’s amazing. In addition, that darkness that allows you to enjoy the night sky is also critical for sea turtles who use our beaches extensively in terms of not being distracted by light pollution at night. So there’s a lot of benefits for that initiative.
We’re looking at a variety of other things, as well, in terms of bringing school groups in and really focusing on education. And we’re also interested in finding new partnerships with local community groups that want to work with us on specific things where they can help bring resources to the table and we can bring resources to the table as well. And to some degree that’s yet to be defined. It’s my hope that this Centennial is not just one big birthday party in the summer of 2016, it really is a variety of new partnerships and initiatives that bring us into the next century.
What user groups? Is it kiters? Surfers? The same user groups that are involved in the access issue?
The answer to your question is yes. It’s everybody and anybody that has some nexus with these NPS units and wants to make a difference and do good things with us.
It almost sounds like you’re trying to convince — not convince — but it’s like a branding thing. You’re shaking people and saying, “Hey! We’re here! Come enjoy us!” How has that changed over the past 100 years? I mean, there are people who come here these days and stay in the pool or their house the whole time.
I don’t the data behind it. But you mentioned the word branding. And I would encourage your readers to go to FindYourPark .com. The park service has a major friends group called the National Park Foundation and they are working very closely with us on the Centennial. And one of the initiatives is called Find Your Park. It’s all about finding out about centennial events. Sharing stories about the protected areas — state parks, local parks, trails, museum, historic sites, national parks — so you can post on these blogs, “I went to so-and-so and here’s what I did.” Sort of developing a new community of park enthusiasts.
It sounds like it comes back to what I was saying earlier: you need people to support these national parks or they may go away eventually. And I’ve heard people say, “Get rid of the park service.” I’m not sure that’s even feasible, but is this self-preservation in some ways?
I don’t know if it’s as much self-preservation as it is treating this Centennial as an opportunity to rebrand in some ways — as you mentioned — and to really reach out on our own. The world is changing. It’s a changing society. And to reach out and try to connect the Park service with a younger generation. I don’t think it’s out of any form of desperation. It’s just changing ways of communicating with a changing world.
Any push back on these initiatives? I love the sound of a night sky, but I could see business owners wanting to leave lights on.
I don’t think we get a lot of friction. In some cases there’s a cost associated and that’s where some times it becomes more challenging. Even for us to retrofit our lights to make them night-sky friendly or to remove certain lights is expensive for Seashore that stretches so many dozens of miles with all these different facilities. That’s a barrier, but I’m confident we’ll get there over time. The cooperation we’ve received from folks like the Hatteras Electrical Co-op and other folks wanting to work with us ah all been very positive.
What about long-term threats? When you look at 100 years, what are the big issues. I know you said something about sea level rise on the phone conference, and that’s some of the frankest language I’ve heard around here.
When I saw in your email you wanted to talk about big things looming in the horizon, the first thing I grabbed was the North Carolina Sea Level Rise Assessment Report. This is the 2015 update to the 2014 report. And they looked out 30 years. And I don’t need to read it to you but basically they’re looking at ranges of sea level rise somewhere between a couple inches up to 10 inches over a 30-year period. For anyone who’s been here a long time and driven down Pea Island between here and Rodanthe, there’s times when you drive past the water and you look and you go, “I’m literally almost at sea level.” And there’s times when 10 inches of water — and even 5 inches of water — can make a huge difference. And not only during ordinary days when it’s 70 degrees outside with 10mph winds but in particular during a time when there’s storm or a lot of rainfall and the groundwater comes up. There are so many challenges associated with living in a location where sea level rise is a factor. And on top of that, not only do we have sea level rise occurring, but you also have subsidence occurring of the land.
And you can look at sea level rise in two different ways. You can look at it as a looming crisis or you can say, “The best available data, the best available science we have, suggests that it’s happening, so let’s plan appropriately and move forward.” And that’s the way I’m choosing to look at it for the sake of the Outer Banks Group. We’re not seeing this as a crisis. We’re seeing this as a continually changing environment. In some cases it’s changing much more quickly than it has in the recent past and that’s definitely challenging. But I think it’s only responsible for us to say, “What does the best available science say? Let’s look at all of our infrastructure, let’s look at access to the park, let’s look at the resources we have, and lets start forecasting out 30 years.” If we know that sea level might rise 2 inches or 5 inches or 10 inches and look at a particular a building or boat ramp or parking lot — a culvert that passes water from once side of Route 12 to the other — and say to ourselves, “If the sea level rises as much as 2 inches or 10 inches higher in 30 years, how would that affect what’s in front of us? And what are our options?”
This is no different than watching the news on TV tonight, before I go down to Buxton tomorrow, and seeing if it’s going to be 60 degrees or 80 degrees and whether or not it’s going to rain or be sunny. Because if I know that I can certainly plan for a much more comfortable day and protect myself from getting sunburned or drenched. Well, we have some science now that forecasts what our climate is going to look like and sea level rise is going to look like so its only responsible to take that into consideration and say, “Now I know this is reasonably likely, what sort of different ways of managing these NPS units should we be considering?” So what we hope to do in the next few years is what we call scenario planning. And actually this sea level rise assessment report is the foundation for that.
So you’re using the state and not the federal one. Because I know the state low-balled a little bit.
What we would probably do is use all of it and say, “There’s a range from nothing happening to the maximum amount and something in between. So, let’s look at all three and scenarios and say ‘What alternative ways might we have of managing these NPS units?’” Because we all know there’s a lot of uncertainty in these scientific predictions. But it’s funny, at the end of my street there’s some bollards by a bike path with a sticker that says, “Life on a sandbar.” Well this is life on a sandbar. And a sandbar is really susceptible to these changes. We’re at ground zero here. So we want to be thinking progressive about how we manage the seashore. And we’re already doing it.
Right now at Coquina Beach we have a trailer where we’re selling ORV permits. It’s open every day of the year. And it’s maybe 50 to 100 feet back from the last dune. It gets beat up by the sand. It experiences the same thing any beachfront home experiences. And we had on the books to spend money, well over $100,000 to end the lease and build a permanent office. And we looked at things like the sea level rise report and though about the storms that came through that can be so damaging and said, “Maybe we ought to make a different decision.” Maybe we ought to let the lease end, let the people come take that trailer way and go across the street to one of the buildings we have and carve out a little space. It might not be as convenient as before, but we’ll still sell permits and we’ll better utilize existing space. But we won’t invest in infrastructure that’s in an extremely fragile or tenuous place. So we’re starting to make those decisions already.
I think that makes total sense. The other side of that is, I know there’s discussion of doing beach nourishment in Buxton, which may not make sense from that long-term perspective. Have you reached any decisions yet?
We’re currently evaluating the impacts. What we’ll do at the end of that evaluation is make a decision on whether or not to issue a special use permit to the county to allow it to happen. What I’m hoping is that we — and I mean the entire community, the seashore, the county, the local residents, the user groups — I’m hoping that in the next five years we can all sit down and say, “We want life to exist out here. We want to continue to have a good economy. We want to continue to protect the resources we have.” But there is no question: it is changing. There’s no question about it. I don’t know if you’ve seen the photographs from Alligator River Wildlife Refuge, but they’re losing shoreline. Trees are dying from saltwater inundation. It’s happening. So what if we all were to get together and say, “We’re all part of this community, the changes are occurring, how do we become progressive and forward thinking and think of the ways we revision our existence out on this sandbar.” So I’d love to see something like that happen. But I can tell you that it would be something the community would have to initiate and we’d love to participate on. Prior to that happening, we need to at least take a look at the science and take a look at our operations and look at alternative ways of doing things in the future. But that’s one of the biggest things that’s out there. And we need to look at. But it’s probably going to take a little time. We need to get through that ORV legislation more first.
But that could be an opportunity for a thawing for some ways and for these groups to talk more and look to the future. Speaking of sea level rise, did the group comment to BOEM on the offshore drilling issue?
The park service in Washington solicited input from us and all the coastal park units. And they basically sent in a letter to BOEM saying we had a number of concerns and asked for a lot of information so we could better articulate our concerns. For example, we asked for good oceanographic modeling that could help us. You know it’s one thing to say if there’s a spill in the ocean there will be oil on the beaches. But it would be really good to know what that risk is and there’s a lot of models out there that will tell you between the gulf stream and the prevailing winds, literally what happens to a drop of oil that comes out of the ground or spills on the ocean’s surface, where would it end up? And talk about scenarios — what if all that happened when there’s a strong easterly wind, or northeasterly wind or south wind or southwest wind? What happens if a spill over laps with a hurricane? So to basically bring that science — just like the seal levels science — to the table so the park service can better understand what that risk is.
Short term stuff: the Frisco pier is gone.
Frisco pier is going to be demolished. We had to do an underwater survey so we could figure out how to safely remove the pilings. But that’s been a plan for a long period of time. And now it’s just a matter of when we do the work.
Tell me about the circle of stones for the foundation.
Just drive over to where the lighthouse is, you’ll see it. It’s an incredible honor to the people who dedicated parts of their lives to operate the lighthouse. It came out beautifully. It’s a semi-circle with crushed stone. Several rings of stones in semi circle that faces the lighthouse. So it’s a great place to do programs or have people sit and rest. We’ll do some of the dedication ceremony later this summer.
And lifeguards are funded?
Lifeguards are funded. We contracted it out, just like we did last year, but all that’s handled in our regional office. But we’re definitely funding the lifeguards this summer.
There are some renovations in store, too?
There’s a major overhaul planned for Wright Brothers. I‘m not sure when that’s all going to happen but it includes all new exhibits. And we actually got funding for all new exhibits, so that’s underway. And that actually takes longer than the renovation of the building itself. So we’re hoping that funding comes through for the building renovation soon so the timing for the exhibits inside an the building construction will mesh and in the next five to 10 years we have a new visitors center.
Any idea what it looks like?
It will be a complete makeover. We’ll bring the media inside up to 2015/2016 and it will continue to be faithful to the story but hopefully the exhibits will be even more engaging.
What about Fort Raleigh? Anything there?
No major changes. We’re trying to continue to build relationships with the Lost Colony and the Roanoke Island Historical Association and the Elizabethan Gardens. Try to find ways to work even more closely together to insure that people realize on Wednesday or Thursday whenever the sunburn’s kicking in that this really is a phenomenal place to visit. That we have a lot of history here, that we have an incredible play that occurs almost nightly, and that we have a lot to offer. And we’ll continue to partner with those organizations — and maybe we’ll partner with new groups — to make sure people understand we have a lot to offer on Roanoke Island.
But I’m really interested in engaging with all the local groups that are tapped into the hip culture. I’m not going to win a lot of interest from the 7- to 15-year old surfers dressed in this uniform — even though I love it — so we are looking for groups to help us tap into ways to attract younger people. Because to some people the Seashore might be all about baking in the sun, to someone else it might be about watching oystercatchers, to someone else it’s about seeing the night sky to someone else it’s about catching bluefish on a seven-foot spinning rod to someone else it’s about having the rideof a lifetime on a wave or a kiteboard. So we want to really connect with all those groups that really enjoy this place.
In many ways, people see the park service as a “keep out” organization. This message sounds more inclusive.
Think about how primal and natural surfing is. Just as an example. Let’s forget the fact the board is foam and fiberglass and not wood, but you’re going out there on a piece of something that floats. It doesn’t make any noise. It’s just a human being paddling the wave. It’s awesome in terms of a low impact sport. It’s a dream sprort for a national park.
You have a lot of that though – the kayaking, kiting, fishing, is all very…
Yes. Really compatible uses within the seashore. So to me it’s exciting. Plus I like to surf. So I‘m excited. I want o get stand up paddleboard. I’m excited because I’m a huge sight fisherman, so you see the fish and cast at it. It’s the type of thing you do down in the Keys for bonefish or tarpon, but you can do it here for redfish and things like that. And they have this SUP you can stand and fish from. I’m thinking I want to do that. I have kayak-fished before, but the height makes it so much better.
What does the park service look like the next 37 to 100 years?
First of all, I’d love to establish a friends group for the seashore. It’s not even about money, it’s about finding ways to keep our visitors who come here connected with the seashore. To leave and maybe get a newsletter to keep them informed of things that are happening. People make their childhood and family memories here. They exercise here. They become adept at incredible sports here. They gaze at the nighttime sky. They see shorebirds. They have incredible experiences. And it would be great to have an organization that would do that. And perhaps they could help us on the educational side as well, to provide resources for educational programs. I mentioned before that we really want to connect the surrounding communities to the park a little bit better. So folks up in Norfolk and Virginia Beach realize they have this gorgeous resource right to their south an hour and half away. And to connect with folks who might not step outside of that urban or suburban environment to this beautiful natural area. So a friends group might be able help us do that. So I’m looking forward to trying to make that happen.
And that goes beyond the National Seashore. Take a place like Wright Brothers — it’s an amazing place in terms of what happened there. But it’s even more amazing when you think about it from the angle of inspiring the younger generation to invent. Inspiring them to embrace science, technology, engineering, math. All those great things that have allowed the US to become a leader in technology. When they see what a couple of people could do in terms of making an airplane fly, I think they become inspired. There are so many opportunities with a friends group to bring in the younger generation and inspire them to do great things for their country. So we relay have a lot of hope when it comes to connecting youth with all of the Outer Banks Group groups units.
Part Two: interviewed April 30.
Good morning Superintendent. Congratulations on getting this all done in time. I’m sure it was a stressful few months.
It was a lot of work, but we have a good team so we did well.
I had a chance to see the report. It’s a lot to digest, but it looks to me like the buffers got a lot smaller. Would you agree?
Yes. We’ve proposed some substantial changes, so we look forward to getting everyone’s feedback.
It also looks like there may be room for more corridors. Or at least make it easier to get to Cape Point. Am I reading that right?
I can see you how you might conclude that. What we’ve done is we’ve basically tried to provide new buffers based on the science we could find. And because they’re smaller, it allows for corridors. Some examples are what we proposed for oystercatchers, what we’ve proposed for piping plovers, what we’ve proposed for sea turtles.
So for piping plovers our standard buffer from an ORV perspective is to have a 1000-meter buffer around the chicks. So what we propose in Alternative B — which is the preferred alternative in the EA — is that we go to a standard buffer of 500 meters. But we believe we can still maintain the same level of protection. And the reason I say that is because we’re also proposing to have additional staff to keep eyes on those chicks. To make sure that if they get out of that 500-meter buffer — or come closer to humans or ORVs — we would have the ability to make adjustments and protect them. And then we’ve gone a step further. And for the sake of trying to make those buffers as small as possible and also to allow for a corridor, we’ve given ourselves the flexibility to go down to 200 meters — but no less — if a particular set of chicks and their 500 meter buffer are preventing access from one place to another. So it gives us that flexibility.
That’s a big change.
And the corridor in that case would be next to the shoreline. One of the things I’ve learned from our biologist here and others who’ve worked here for a long time is that traditionally — and it’s important for me to stress this could change— but traditionally a lot of the chicks who utilize the Cape Point area use some of the ponds that are a little bit north and west of Cape Point as opposed to the eastern shore line facing the Atlantic Ocean. And because of that, there may be some opportunities where this flexibility allows for a corridor down the shoreline to Cape Point itself.
That being said, we can’t predict what these birds are going to do every year. And we also have a lot of overlap between different species. I’ve got a great map we’ll be using in the public meetings, but this area of Cape Hatteras National Seashore is one of the most highly preferred areas for wildlife to nest on throughout the Outer Banks. It’s really wild when you see this graphic of all the different oystercatchers and colonial nesting birds and piping plovers that nest in this area. So there’s a lot of overlap. And that will make things complicated. That being said, I’m confident the proposal we’ve put forward will provide significantly more flexibility than we’ve had in the past.
Gotcha. No guarantees. And I know you don’t have this approved —although between A &B, I think I know what most people around here would say — but if it does go through, what are chances of chanages happening this summer?
Remember: this is just a proposal at this time. We haven’t made a decision to implement Alternative B. And the reason is, we want to hear from the public. And we have a 15-day public comment period that kicked off yesterday afternoon. So it’s critical to hear from the public and understand everybody’s thoughts on the proposal before we make a decision. If we make a decision to implement alternative B, I anticipate we’ll be able to make some of the changes that are contained within Alternative B, but not all of them. And the reason for that is if you read the environmental assessment, you’ll notice we’re attempting to keep the same level of protection that we have under the current plan that governs the use of ORVs and pedestrian access to the seashore. However, you notice, Alternative B makes the buffers smaller and we provide some of these corridors. Well, the only way to do that and maintain protection is to have additional staff to keep eyes on these situations. So it’s going to take a little bit of time to obtain these staff so we can make sure we meet our commitments. We won’t have all those staff on board this summer. So I would say we’ll have what I call, “phased implementation.” We’ll do what ever we can with the staff we have this summer, and we would be able to implement all of the changes we proposed here — if we choose that alternative — next summer.
And that’s still an ‘if.’ I know we think of it as ‘our park’ but it’s a national park. And people who don’ live here get equal weight in their comments. So nothing’s assured. But there does seem to be a real effort to bend over backwards. Extra staff to watch birds, seems like a big difference.
Absolutely. And it behooves people to behave and follow the routes. But it goes for pedestrians as well. For piping plovers, the previous buffers were 300 meters. We took it down to 100 meters. That’s a 2/3 reduction for pedestrians. So we paid special attention to the language that Congress presented and we did our best to meet the intent of that.
When we spoke before you, mentioned the friends groups. How do the mechanics of these friends groups work? Because I picture people being able to pool money to build another ramp or access. If people were to develop a group and they raise money, can they earmark or encourage how that money is spent? If they want to raise money for another walk over, is that a feasible idea or is it more complex than that?
Basically the way friends groups work is that there are a bunch of people and they’re often from near and far — they could be from California and Buxton — and they all get together and they say, “We love Cape Hatteras National Seashore for all these different reasons and we want to support it for all these reasons.” And they form a relationship with the Seashore. So they say, we want to help you implement the highest priorities for the seashore. And this is typically the way it works in most parks. And we would explain what those priorities are. And if those priorities happen to be access projects, meaning ramps or walkways for ramps or ORVS, and we didn’t have the funds, they may go out and help us raise funds to meet those highest priorities.
Or even if it needs hiring more bodies to watch nests? Obviously, you can’t hire people based on those donations, but if you’ve got more money in the kitty, you can say, “We have breathing space.”
We do the best we can to use the funds that are appropriated to us inside the seashore. And I think we’re lucky to have the funding we have and I think we do a very good job. That being said, a friends group can provide what I call “a margin of excellence” to provide the additional staff to take an ordinary project and make it special. And many friends groups around the country have helped park service units in that manner. The federal land management agency sets the policy of what we need to do to manage these plans. But a Friends group can help us do things we don’t have funds to do.
The friends group can’t dictate what to do. But if it’s on the list of things to do, having the money to do it would help achieve that.
Absolutely. Or, if having a group of volunteer sea turtle nest watchers may allow us to have an ORV corridor longer than if we didn’t have any eyes on that next.
Or the projects on the list that don’t have the funding.
Yes, the 29 projects that were put out in the environmental assessment of 2013. But on April 22, we put out a press release that we re-prioritized projects to be consistent with the defense authorization language. In which they asked us to expedite construction of these access points. And that’s precisely what we did. We pulled out all of the ramps form that 29-project EA. And either decided we were going to finish them up as soon as possible or decided to fast forward the ones that had not been implemented yet. So you’ll see that we’re completing ramp 25. We’re about to start ramp 32 and have most have completed by 2015. We’ve taken an interdunal road between ramp 45 and 49 — which is sort of the Hatteras to Frisco campground section — and we’re going to build a 4-mile unpaved road, which we cal the interdunal road there. And that’s a really big project that will allow ORVs to go from ramp 49 to ramp 45 without having to get back on the highway. That was something that was highly desired by the public. We originally weren’t going to start that until 2017. No we’re starting that project this summer. Another is ramp 48, which will be constructed between ramp 45 and 49. So that you might be in the ramp 45 area —which is close to Cape Point campground. And you might decide you want to go over to the Frisco area, but actually get on the beach sooner than if you did by ramp 49. And we’re not even going to start hat project until 2018. That will now begin in 2015. So, in total, we’ve basically taken about three-quarters of a million dollars worth of projects that weren’t going to start or be completed for several years and we’re getting all those things started.
And I heard from a lot of folks in Frisco that Ramp 49, which is just to the west-southwest of the campground, that often times there’s a sea turtle that decides to nest right by that ramp and basically closes that entire section of ORV-accessible beach that’s very popular with families and swimmers and fishermen — probably surfers as well. Now, with some of the things we’re proposing, you would be able to go down this interdunal road down a couple of miles and get on the beach and you have a de facto corridor that goes around that nest. And we recognized that provided a lot of flexibility and , consistent with the legislation, made a decision to make that happen as soon as we could.
Like you said, “flexible.” This all sounds like it has the potential to be more flexible.
Exactly. Another example is ramp 63 in Ocracoke. That was another place we wanted to implement these flexibilities as soon as possible. So we’ll begin construction of 63 in 15/16 versus having that project start in 16 or 17.
And you have 2 weeks for people to comment. And by mid June the word will ring out that his is what you’re proposing. And then comes the next level of implementation based on species behavior and funding and all the detail work.
They have a sense of what we’re proposing now. What they’ll find out in June is what we’ve selected, but only after we’ve received all this input from the two-week public review period. But June is when we plan to release that decision. And as you said, the implementation of that plan will take some time. But this plan would really enhance the flexibility and adaptive management concept that was in the original plan. This is basically an enhancement of that.
And it’s Choice A or Choice B. Which is totally different from before, when it was , A, B, C, D. It’s pretty much, keep what you got or try something different.
And we’re already working on the second phase, which is the morning openings, vehicle free areas and seasonal ORV routes. And we’ll launch that public process after we’re done with this, hopefully sometime in July. And we’ll be talking to the public again to get a sense of what they desire. Really, if there’s one last thing to stress here, for any pedestrian or ORV user that wants to utilize Cape Hatteras National Seashore’s beaches and is looking for additional flexibility in terms of our ability to provide access, that wont’ happen by one form or another. It’s really going to happen through a variety of different measures. And that first measure is the expedited construction plan — again, we expedited three-quarters of a million dollars in projects several years ahead to try and provide additional access. The second way is through proposals we made to look at wildlife buffers and corridors. The third way is through the evaluation of the vehicle-free areas the morning openings and the seasonal ORV routes. And that’s yet to be determined and Congress told us to consider that, and that’s what we’ll do. But the take home message is: for anyone who wants to understand how to gain additional flexibility, look at all those pieces, not just one.
Between the ORV proposal — and just our conversations — there seems to be a more welcoming tone compared to the past ten years. Was that part of the reason you were hired? To cleanse the palate for lack of a better term — from the past bitterness?
All I can tell you is the posting was vacant and I was excited to get the job. I certainly had the goal of trying to build trust and partner with the community. One of our priorities here at the Outer Banks group is to work closely as we can with the public and to build relationships. I see this as just one of one of many things in which we want to hope to build relationships with the public. It doesn’t matter to me if it’s a proposal for beach nourishment, if it’s a proposal to bring in inner city kids from Hampton Roads for educational experiences on the seashore, if it’s a celebration of flight at the Wright Brothers. So this is just one of the many things we hope to strengthen the relationship. Because we know that the public — near and far — has a lot to offer in terms of ideas and in terms of their genuine love and appreciation for the resource. I guess all I hope is the public sees we’re talking to folks. We’re willing to talk to anybody and everybody — and listen to them.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
“Can you talk right now? Meet me at McDonalds and we’ll go for a ride.”
He may no longer be the state’s most powerful politico, but when Marc Basnight agrees to meet for an interview, you still drop everything and hop in the car. Which is exactly what we did this December. And while cruising streets between Nags Head and Corolla isn’t the most formal setting, in this case, you couldn’t pick a more fitting approach.
After all, when the Manteo native became a freshman senator in 1984, roads in Eastern North Carolina were cramped at best — crumbling at worst. It took almost six hours to get to Raleigh. And the psychological distance between the capital and the Outer Banks was even greater.
“My first speech I said, ‘Fellow senators, I come to say this region I represent has been screwed,” he recalls. “I believe we should’ve been part of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Because no one here much cares about us. That was a mistake — they looked at me like Benedict Arnold.”
Basnight soon proved his loyalty to the state and his district. Over 26 years of service — and a record nine terms as the senate’s President pro tempore — the Democratic leader garnered bipartisan support and drew attention to coastal issues from water quality to infrastructure to education. He also brought in plenty of dollars, helping fund facilities from Roanoke Island Festival Park to Jennette’s Pier to the NC Wildlife Center in Currituck.
All that ended in 2010 when the Republican party won control of the General Assembly for the first time in more than a century. In January 2011, Basnight announced he was battling A.L.S. — the debilitating neurological condition also called Lou Gehrig’s Disease — and retired from politics. Four years after stepping down, it’s easy to see how he made the ascent. And while his speech may be slower, his mind still fires on all cylinders. Over several hours — and two separate interviews — we drove from Whalebone Junction to the Whalehead Club, covering issues from economics to religion to poverty to mortality. No matter the subject, he was well-informed, open to debate, disarmingly candid and plainly humble.
“Any number of people out here could’ve created change when I was elected,” he insists. “Whether it was me or someone else, the change was gonna come.”
Today, change has come again. This time pushing the tide of power more inland, and further right, making it a perfect moment ask the senator about the next round of challenges. Because whether or not you agree with his views, Marc Basnight commands a level of experience no other Outer Banks politician can claim: both an innate, boots-on-the ground familiarity with local issues — and an understanding of how power works from here to the White House. — Matt Walker
[Ed. Note: What follows is the unedited transcript of two separate interviews over two drives, beginning with a cruise up the beach road to Kitty Hawk and back through Nags Head.]
You’re in a position to talk about the state of the community in a way few people can. Especially in light of how things have changed since you stopped serving in Raleigh.
Change can be very good. Change can affect people —change will affect — people in diffent ways. And change can be negative.
A lot’s happened in the last couple of years. What impacts do you see? And is it positive or negative or both?
All change is created at the wishes of the people. You mentioned you went to James Madison University. A school named after one of my heroes. George Washington, my hero, could’ve been anointed as some of form monarch. In fact, Hamilton felt that he should. Washington rejected the executive being all too powerful and then Madison, Franklin, Gouverneur Morris crafted Madison’s famous constitution and Bill of Rights. How do you connect that to the Outer banks? Easy. That form of government creates just what you see [Waves his hand around to the surroundings outside the car.] A voice of the people through elections. Not a democracy. But a republic. If there’s to be any cursing or dissatisfaction by us — meaning all of us — in the change being expressed at the voting booth, our form of government represents this change. We elected them. My grandfather, who chaired the Dare County Board of Commissioners along with a handful of others, determined what we are at that time. We just had a new election. Bob Woodard and his crew. Southern Shores, Kill Devil Hills. Manteo. Nags Head. Kitty Hawk. They all determine who we are in their brief time that they are elected. On another level, Paul Tine, Bill Cook, the president pro tem, speaker, governor, president — our whole form of government is what you see here.
I’m pleased with all of our elected officials. Now, did I vote for some of the commissioners? No I did not. My philosophy is different. But, that said, the new board now represents me. And I want to do everything I can to help make them successful. Nothing I can do. I’m now a big cheerleader. I want success.
But early on, someone said, “We’re going to have education. We’re going to educate our people.” That was the genius to what America is. Sad to say our public schools have surrendered to mediocrity. But our universities are leading the world. Of the top then schools in the world, I bet you eight are here in America. Maybe 10. Of the top 100, 80. Reading yesterday in Bloomberg magazine, Duke — a southern school — overtook Chicago’s Booth School of Business. The first time a northern school was defeated in the rankings of MBA programs. Significant for the economy of here. And if you look at that top 20 of the business schools MBA programs, scroll down, you’ll see UNC Chapel Hill’s Kenan-Flagler School of Business. And right behind Chapel Hill, Cornell and MIT. [Grins.]
I feel like the state’s changed its tune on education. Funding is being cut. The governor said a couple years ago state universities shouldn’t offer liberal arts degrees. Do you think it’s undervalued now compared to 20 years ago?
Not so much undervalued as misunderstood. The wage gap is a serious problem. People are fighting to make payments. Car payments. House payments. A refrigerator payment. Insurance. Health. They get disconnected from that value. That training. That four-year degree. Or that two-year degree. For-profit schools represent a weakening of the knowledge of a course. I’m for online courses, don’t get me wrong. But the structure needs to be one that isn’t dominated by money.
I imagine McCrory — and others in government, not just him — doesn’t fully realize the significance of what North Carolina is achieving through their doctoral university and masters programs. I’m not trying to choose one over the other. But UNC Chapel Hill today receives more NIH grants than Yale. There are seven in the country. Who knows that that has happened in Art’s Place his morning? I’m not smashing anyone. That waitress in Art’s and at the Lone Cedar making nominal money can’t read magazines and papers first thing in the morning. She has to get her child to the day care. But the importance of schooling at the high level creates a better change.
The point I’m making is we all learn. And McCrory is realizing — if he didn’t already — the value of these public schools. East Carolina, UNC Charlotte. The girl working at the Dunkin Donuts, where I get coffee through a drive thru — after having Front Porch Coffee. But I can’t walk in. She’s from Moldova. Acing every class at COA. Wants to live here in America. How fortunate are we? Very. Education.
What I want to know most more that anything is a lot of people feel that — in your absence — Dare County and the coast is under attack. That it may even be retribution for your years of influence. Do you agree? Or is it just way politics works?
Not at all. I don’t feel that or believe that. I was close friends with many Republicans in the senate. I also consider McCrory a friend. He’s been in my old office in Raleigh. I don’t believe there’s any animosity.
Really?
[Nods.] I have no enemies. I do believe that when power shifts there’s a different priority system. That’s important to occur. Again, it represents the very wishes of the people. I honor that. The greater focus on urbanization — the I-85 corridor. Starting at Raleigh, Chapel Hill , Durham, Greensboro. Winston Salem. Charlotte. And the growing areas in the state. Beautiful people. There is in place, winners and losers. When I first got elected, it was hard to explain our plight, our condition, in this region of North Carolina. That was a change as we got more established.
I remember my first speech. Marshall Rauch, a senator from Gaston County, chaired the Senate Caucus. I was one of 50 who got the wonderful privilege to represent their region. Got a call to Pinehurst for the caucus meeting. He gave every freshman member opportunity to stand and address the caucus. And I stood: “I’m here from the first senatorial district. Home of flight. Where America began with a settlement 19 years before Jamestown. Home of colonial Edenton.” I went on and on. And then I made a mistake. I said, “Fellow senators. I come here knowing that we made a mistake when we carved out Virginia and North Carolina. This region I represent has been screwed. And I believe we should’ve been part of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Because no one much cares about us.” We had no roads at that point. I-17 coming out of Deep Creek, two lanes, killing people. 158/168., coming out of Chesapeake, a disgrace. Highway 64 too. It used to take me 5 and half hours to get to my capital. I could get to Richmond quicker. NC 12 was 18-foot wide, water holes everywhere. Hyde County. Bertie. Columbia. Not the way.
Yet, because of people, that change did occur. It wasn’t me. The timing was very right for change in North Carolina. It could’ve been any number of people out here who could’ve been elected when I was to create that knowledge that something was wrong. East Carolina had to fight for every damn thing, for what little scraps the University could get. Western Carolina, Appalachian state. Same thing. UNC Wilmington, same thing. Elizabeth City State. nothing. Change was coming. Whether it was me or someone else , it was gonna come. Now lead to today. A different kind of change. We’ll have to wait to see. It may be okay. It may be fine.
What other challenges did you face besides roads and infrastructure?
Education was underfunded. We created a small schools funding mechanism. And now Chowan County. Pequimans County. Hyde County. Washington County. Currituck. And they all get special funding. And then the big initiative took some time: funding the university and community colleges at a level unheard of in America. We put before the voters a bond package to build structures at our university and community colleges, larger than anything ever seen in the America. $3.1 billion dollars. That’s throughout the state. And then, earlier, we set up a transportation infrastructure improvement program. Raised the gas tax, raised fees, and got money into DOT.
It’s funny you say that, because that’s the opposite of what’s happening now. Nobody will raise taxes now. The DOT is cutting budgets by replacing litter removal with adopt a highway programs.
You see, it comes back to people struggling. They don’t want taxes. They’re looking for a paycheck. The trouble with this interview is I can’t go deep in my thoughts.
Would you rather do an email interview?
I’ve never done an email in my life [laughs].
So what are the challenges for Outer Banker will face in the next 30 years?
The challenges are about the same. Statewide and nationally, the national scene is a wreck. The challenges here: erosion. I’m a big fan of beach nourishment. A big, big, big fan. Where you have beach and wide dunes you have no damage from water. none. Kill Devil Hills is a good example. Hurricanes, water is the damaging element. wind, no. In the recent storm, wind has done little damage. It’s erosion. a properly funded beach nourishment plan can help. My ancestors came here because of water, transportation. All of the people who live here now, I mean the vast majority came because of the influence of big blue.
When you say that, I immediately think of about offshore drilling. For me, the beach nourishment is a more complex issue. It’s smarter than hardened structures, but it’s not a cure all. Drilling is black-and-white since it threatens our whole economy. It also renders every other major issue moot: keeping the inlet open, Bonner Bridge, NC 12, beach access — all that’s for naught if we have an accident.
I’ve never been for drilling out here. The risk is way too great.
Do you think it’s a done deal? Between the lobbies and behind the scene deals, it seems inevitable.
Fossil fuels, natural gas, I hope that natural gas is a bridge to renewable technology advancing. The key to renewable is storage. Energy storage. After the BP spill I went to the Gulf Coast. Before the spill I went to the Gulf Coast. Before the spill. Ten years before, I saw little droplet of oil. In Galveston Beach they have kerosene cans when you come off the beach to rub the oil off. I went to refineries in Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi, Alabama. I went to Dauphin Island, Alabama. Beautiful white sand. After BP, ugly. But if you polled the people living here. I imagine they’re for it. They amount of oil you would get here is miniscule compared to the millions of barrels pumped daily in the world. Not worth the risk. But energy always has driven the world. Horses. Rail. Wheel. Coal.
I guess part of my frustration — and I know from the presentation you made with Purdue and Duke on wind energy in Buxton in 2009 and what tidal energy research CSI is doing — this place should be on the leading edge of new technologies. And that’s where you’ll get long term jobs and revenue.
Obama killed the damn wind farm on the Outer Banks. He did.
How?
I funded a 3- or 4-year study by UNC Chapel Hill that determined a wind farm in Pamlico Sound. Dominion Power didn’t want t do anything on wind turbines. Jim Rogers is CEO of Duke Energy — the largest energy company in America. I said, “You’re building wind turbines all over the mid-west — Indiana, Kansas, Iowa. I saw them.. I went out there. I said, “Why in the hell don’t you build wind turbines on the water, here? Like the North Sea.” He took a money clip out of his pocket. Had some loose bills in it. He threw it on my conference table. He said, “You get the permits, and I’ll build them.” I said, “Jim: don’t f–k me now.” He said,” I challenge you.” And my wheels were turning — what a grand opportunity. I want to remind you, we now have a president who wants wind — and not one turbine in the water. Not one. Nowhere. Can’t get a permit from the federal government. Can’t get one.
What’s the issue? Too many competing interests?
You read just like I read. Birds. Ships. Military. But we did the UNC study and I got temporary blessings — not a permit — from marine fisheries, CAMA, military, fish and wildlife, everyone. And then Amy [Fulk] came in — my chief of staff, brilliant lady. She said, “Boss, you’re not going to like this.” After four years of studying, Duke was ready to put up three, 5-megawatt turbines in Pamlico Sound for a one-year test. And then erect 172 turbines in Pamlico Sound. They had spent $3.9 million of their dollars, getting prices form Seimens and General Electric. It was supposed to cost $80-some million for 3 turbines. They met with Fish and Wildlife. And the impression they got from that meeting was that Fish and Wildlife would go along with 3 turbines but in no way would they commit to a wind farm in Pamlico Sound. Duke didn’t want 3 transmission lines! I didn’t want three! Three were a symbol! Didn’t do nothing for energy! So they come in my office and say, “If you can’t get some pathway to a large wind farm on the water, It’s dead. We’re not spending more money playing badminton, beating a ball back and forth.”
Obama comes into Raleigh. I said, “Amy, get this letter ready, telling him what the obstacle is.” We got Duke, wanting no money. Not a damn dime. Largest investment they have ever made, 172 turbines. Billions of dollars. I told him, “Mr. President. Your speech on renewable energy, you noted we have not permitted wind turbines in the water. And you would like them. I told him, Duke Energy’s ready. But Fish and Wildlife surprised us. They’re okay with 3, but they’re non-committal to any other wind turbines.”
So you’re speaking directly to the president now.
Yes. And he said, “Well, I’m surprised. “ I said, “It’s all right here” and handed the letter to him. He handed the letter to a man beside him. Weeks later, we’ve heard nothing. Duke had heard nothing. Months went by . A letter came in the mail to me, it said, “We received your letter and we thank you for your comments.” [Laughs.] And that’s sort of typical of him. I’ve seen a pattern of wonderful speeches with no follow-through. I love him and hate him.
He’s certainly been a frustrating leader for people who expected a lot more progressive policies.
Well, this is a real life experience of that out here on the Outer Banks. Look: all this wind. No wind energy. None. We were very excited. But I also wrote him and handed him another letter about Bonner Bridge and Oregon Inlet. Again, Amy said, “Boss, we’re getting nothing out of this administration.” Minnesota bridge fell. I told Obama to his face, in a meeting with 4 or 5 others, that this bridge could fall with school kids in a bus. I really liked his expression s on his face. Like I was talking one-on-one, like he was listening. I now realize he wasn’t listening.
Do you think you would’ve gotten more traction out of Bush? Did you have a chance to talk to him, too?
Same damn thing with Bush. He came to Concord — I never let them have a free ride — I said, Mr. President, please help with the rockfish. Nothing. But Bill Clinton, I got him. He followed through. Cape Hatteras Lighthouse.
That’s how it got moved?
[Nods]. Norma Mills, my chief of staff, said “Boss, the president is coming to North Carolina and will speak to a joint session of house and senate about public education.” He was using what we had done as an example. I said “Norma, tell his people I need some limited time to talk privately with him about the lighthouse.” We had no money. None. I had given a task to the engineer department at NC State to determine whether that light could be moved. That was the main concern I had: that it would fall. I asked the dean of the School of Engineering at State to find out. He came back with a report that it could be moved, no problem. No fear. I took it to the people. The people were divided.
I remember that. Big time.
The national park decided to move it. But they came in with no damn money. President comes to talk and Norma says, “Boss, he can’t make it. His schedule’s too tight.” And I said, “Damn.” I was shocked. I said, “Well, Norma, tell his people they can’t come here.” [Smiles.] The governor, Jim Hunt, got involved and said, “Marc, he’ll meet. “ We met. I rode with him from the legislative building to Air Force One in his limo. I gave him a miniature lighthouse — a special one that the Roberts family had given me to give to him. The Roberts created the Outer Banks Lighthouse Society; they wanted it moved. I asked, “Have you ever seen the Cape Hatteras Lighthouse? Or been to the Outer Banks?” He said, “Yes. I went to the Wright Brothers.” I gave him every reason to move the light. He said, “Senator, I don’t do pork barrel. Never have.” I said, “Well, your wrong, Mr. President. You’re so wrong. This isn’t pork. This is a piece of maritime history. And it’s about to be a big ass pile of bricks. It’s gonna fall.” He said, “I’ll get back with you.” Two weeks later, he called. He said, “Mr. President, Bill Clinton here. I’ll put moving the Cape Hatteras Lighthouse in my budget request to Congress asking for the money. But you have to get [U.S. Sentors] Jesse Helms and Lawton Faircloth on board.”
Now, Lawton was saying bad things about Hillary Clinton at the time on national news. I called Jesse Helms. “Senator, I need your help.” He said, “Whatever I can do for you, Marc, I’m at your disposal.” I always liked him. I told him what I needed was for him to support the president’s line item budget request to move the lighthouse. And he said, “Never in this world. That’s pork barrel.” [laughs] I called Lawton. And Lawton said — not in his exact words, but close — “If that son of a bitch would do that, I’ll make sure the congress budgets the money to move the lighthouse.” I never got Jesse, but Lawton did not sit back. He secured the money. That’s the story on the lighthouse.
Ed. note: One week later, we took a second drive. This time we head north to Corolla and back on NC 12. Off tape, I’ve wished him “Happy Holidays.”]
SENATOR BASNIGHT: Don’t say “Happy Holidays.” Say “Merry Christmas.”
MILEPOST: Sorry. I’m just trying to be inclusive of Hannukah and the other winter celebrations.
BASNIGHT: But Hanukkah is earlier. If you read about our founding, if you read the founding principles of America, America created a different government. It wasn’t founded on Hebrew or the Jewish faith. It was founded on the Christian faith. Like the Middle East has Islam, India has Hinduism, China has Buddhism. What I’m saying is [Christians] chose the 25th [of December] because that was when Jesus was born. They did not choose the Jewish or Muslim dates. Then the founders did other things. They incorporated God. God is a god of all people. God oversees Jewish faith, Hindu faith, Buddhism, Muslims, Christians. God is all these. But the reason for the 25th was Jesus. I think I’m right. Correct me if I’m wrong.
Well, I’d always heard that Jesus was born in summer, and the Romans moved the date to December to coincide with the Saturnalia as a way to draw new followers. But I’m certainly no student of the Bible. Most of what I know is osmosis. But clearly, December 25 — at least for the past 1700 years — is the celebration of Jesus’ birthday. Again: I’m not religious. But I love Christmas. I’m a big fan of the idea of “Peace on earth, good will to men.”
Jesus was the only one who believed in all people. He never, ever condemned a homosexual. He never condemned a prostitute. He invited all people into his flock, most especially poor people.
I’ve never read the Jeffersonian bible, which apparently focuses strictly on what Jesus said, but I understand it’s very interesting.
I read it. Jefferson was a very complex person. He had his own beliefs and his theories of life. He also believed blacks were inferior. But he was such a great thinker, how could he determine any human being was inferior? Money. His income depended on slavery. Did he truly believe that Sally Hemmings was inferior? No, he didn’t. But he had to have some pronouncement [for keeping slaves] and he couldn’t find one, I don’t believe.
It’s a pretty telling insight on how people can still justify things for money. They trick themselves. I’m sure Dick Cheney’s definition of torture would change were the tables turned, but obviously people create their personal lines to justify certain actions. Which is probably the driving force behind a lot of ill doings.
This is where Jesus comes in: a moral compass to set your course. If there was no hereafter, why not torture? If the human being just comes from the sperm and the egg, then there’s no moral compass, no laws. Man can’t make a law. He says you can torture and everyone says fine. But people with a moral compass will say, “No, that’s not fine.” Another point of why you treat mankind equal: as you would want to be treated, you treat others. That’s the principle of Jesus. The golden rule. But I’m not very religious — not like I should be. Have you read the Bible?
No. I’ve always wanted to, if nothing else because it’s the basis of so much of our literature and culture.
You should. It’s your basis also. From what I know about you, you’re a golden rule kind of man. What Jesus said, if a man hits you, turn the cheek. Don’t hit him back. if a man steals your clothes, open your home and offer more clothes. Don’t go after him.
That was my main beef, post 911. I felt like we were getting sucker-punched. And we squandered a whole lot of good will over-reacting in Iraq.
Never should’ve went there. Vietnam neither. Eisenhower, one of the two or three of our greatest presidents. His task was to stop Hitler. When he came home from the war, he got elected president. The Korean War was blazing. What did Eisenhower do? He withdrew all troops. All troops. If you go to his tomb in Abilene, Kansas — not West Point, not Arlington, but his home — you’ll see a message on top. The one he chose — and you’ll have to check this — but it says, “Money spent on every bullet and tank in the military is a dollar not spent on the poor.” [Ed. note: the real quote is, “Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.”]
Knowing that — and knowing that many U.S. leaders do voice Christian principles — how do you explain why the defense budget can run amok but not social security or Medicare?
Easy: money. They lobby in Congress. People like Eisenhower and Carter didn’t believe in war. If you remember, Reagan was in office when they attacked Beirut. Two-hundred-plus marines killed. Reagan didn’t fight. Reagan didn’t fight Russia. He told Gorbachev, “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall.” And today, we’re building a wall between Mexico and us. Reagan said, “Tear down this wall.” Democrats and Republicans want to build a wall.
Because of money. Fear? Both?
A combination. But the wall is being built because we have no control of the numbers. We need a system of immigration where the Lone Cedar, the farmer, the hotel owner is given a law for his needs of workers. In America, we seem to have a system that is out of balance. Now, they can’t get workers in America to go clean. The farmer in California or in North Carolina, in the mountains, he can’t get an American worker to go pick apples. Can’t get him. Unemployment rate is imbalanced. And they penalize me if I hire someone illegal. But I can’t find someone do the work. I’d also up the rate to $12 an hour.
So you think they should raise minimum wage then?
Hell, yeah. I don’t pay minimum wage nowhere. But I also don’t pay $12 an hour. If we were all made to pay $12, yes, there would be some losses, but the winners would be the poor guy that really, really struggles. A balance — that is what I’m saying. Now, there’s a population of people who won’t work. Won’t work. They have a bad attitude. Struggle with basic principles of how you treat a fellow worker or a boss. They’re spiteful all the time. But that’s another subject.
But that’s probably always been the case. And you’re never going to fix those people. I feel like people assume if you don’t have money, you’re not working. There’s a real venom toward the working poor in this country. And there’s a lot of working poor here. It’s a community of haves and have-nots. You either own the restaurant, or you’re working in it. There’s not a whole lot of in between.
But a lot of restaurant owners struggle, too. And many employees work two jobs. Or more. They have to pay for their house. They don’t have a choice. I don’t see a lot of wealthy people out here. Not a lot of wealthy, wealthy people. Maybe a hundred? I don’t know.
To me, this is a place a conduit for wealth. Not much wealth is generated here. It comes from other places and flows through every summer. And it doesn’t last very long. I guess fishing was the same way: you caught your catch and sold it and went and caught some more.
People that live here, I’ve found, are very generous, caring people in general. Very passionate about their beliefs in life. A wonderful mix of people. Wonderful. All incomes. Not high incomes. I don’t see any of that. Now in Raleigh, there is a lot of wealth. A lot. Some of them are very generous. We wouldn’t have a lot of our museums, we wouldn’t have a lot of services for poor people, if it wasn’t for them. And churches. Churches are the foundation of the poor. When someone is down and out, churches are always there. Always. And other places for shelters. Our community has an undercurrent of generosity. People who have done very well out here are givers. I’ve found. So there’s enough money in this community to lift up the other people.
There’s a lot of benefits here, I know that. Seems like every weekend. Which is great in some ways, but it’s troubling as well because it shows how much need there is. And people who visit here think we’re all rich, but the reality is many people struggle.
Now, I disagree with that. If you want to see poverty, go to Bertie County, Northampton, Hertford. The poor people there live on only government programs. Not here. In about 6 months here, you can work hard enough to survive. In fact, the labor shortage out here is so great we have to bring labor in from Eastern Europe, Northern Mexico and Central America.
Isn’t that cheaper labor, too. Don’t Eastern Europeans save the employer money in insurance and taxes?
They don’t get unemployment or security. That’s 7.2% on very payroll, the employer won’t pay. But the salary of a worker is based on talent, attitude, effort. You don’t pay everybody the same. You can’t, if you do, why would someone give effort?
But unemployment is a big part of living here. It’s how a lot of people survive. It’s also how businesses keep employees. So it’s a different world out here.
Restaurants out here open and close on an abnormal rate. You work very hard, long hours, to succeed. But it’s the same thing for Virginia Beach. I bet you the failure rate out there is great. I saw where one of favorites, the Jewish Mother, is closed. They’d moved around [too much]. But all small business requires a lot of work.
Now, big business, particularly what I’m seeing today, is wrong. Is wrong. Bill and Melinda Gates, wonderful people, the richest man in the world. In the world. No sheik in Saudi Arabia is worth what Bill is worth. Putin isn’t worth what Bill is worth. A good man. A good woman. But, what you see is that if government doesn’t level that playing field, then all of these great people — Warren Buffet, too — they just keep taking, taking, taking, and these people will amass all the money. Within the law now — it’s the law that’s the problem. I think at least — I’m looking from the outside looking in, but that’s what it looks like now. Looks like. But four of the wealthiest people in the world are the Waltons [from Wal-Mart]. Now, it seems they want more and more. Why won’t they pay their workers more money?
I think the stock market has a lot to do with it. It’s more important to show profits and pay dividends than to pay workers.
But why? Why? You’re a human being. Why do this to people? Costco, an incredible company, they pay an average of $20 an hour — on their own. It can be done.
On a state level, does that make it harder for a county like us to affect change? I mean, tourism is a big number — $950 million. But it’s split over a few hundred businesses. It’s not like Big Oil or Big Pharma where a handful of companies control that much wealth. How do you flex muscle back on place where there’s pharmaceutical companies and universities? How did you do that? You obviously had some success.
We’re all what we are. I don’t know that I had great success. In some areas, they say I was. I can’t judge myself. I can’t do that.
Is there anything you wish you’d done differently?
Well, you don’t look back. You look forward. I never toast my accomplishments. Never weep about my failures, whatever they may be.
I think people would like to know what you’d done differently.
The answer is you don’t look back. Only forward.
Well, you clearly have opinions on the national state of things. Do you wish you’d run for a US seat?
No. I was probably at my limit. Now, I look at Congress and I am baffled by their inability to make simple changes that guide opportunity for all people. An example: Wall Street. To me, it’s very simple to rein in the banks on Wall Street. But no, they own Obama, Bush, Hillary, the other Bush, Republican, Democrat, Nancy Pelosi, John Boehner, McConnell, Harry Reid. They own them. It’s so disgusting to see Democrats and Republicans craft a budget bill that removed one of the strong tenets of Frank-Dodd. Removed it. No debate. They all got together and the President of the United States pushed and lobbied to remove one of the very core tentes on derivatives. What they did is push more wealth to the top, and took it from that framer. [Points to a house being built.] Now, is that right?
I would say no. But that framer very well could’ve voted for that to happen in some way, shape or form.
If he voted Republican or Democrat, he did. Shame on both parties.
So knowing that — and knowing that the electoral process is supposed to represent the will of the people — is it system failure?
No. Not at all. The system behaved just like it was supposed to do. The change will come. There will be some maverick. Some leader that the people will galvanize on. It won’t be extreme left or extreme right.
But you don’t wish you were one of those leaders to try?
I didn’t have that talent. I have limitations. I’m not of that caliber.
You don’t think so?
I would raise too much hell. Way too much.
The more issues I cover, the more I realize that political decision are never as simple as do it this way or do it that way. I think many people are uninformed as to how process works and the importance of compromise. Funny how the same people who usually scream about wanting compromise are the ones who are least willing to give it.
That’s a very powerful statement. Opinionated people want compromise, but then they won’t compromise. Not at all.
Did you come up against that a lot in Raleigh?
Absolutely. [smiles] I always had 49 wonderful people of diverse views and backgrounds that I worked for, 18 years. I’ll give you an example. See that building. [Points at the Center for Wildlife Education Corolla]. It’s free. No charge. The wonderful director of North Carolina Wildlife, Charlie Fullwood. Came to my office one day. My door was always open to him. Smart guy. Loved a beer in the afternoon. And, when I first met him, I loved a beer also. More than one. [Smiles.] He said, “Chief” — he called me chief — “Chief, we need a building to house our department that is separate from the Archdale Building.” A complete eysore, the Archdale Building. Looked like crap. About 15 stories, I guess. And no energy savings adaptations. no where. He said, “We want to build an office and wildlife center on state property off Blue Ridge Road.” I said, “That sounds wonderful, Charlie. Where are you going to get the money?” He said, “That’s the good part. I don’t have to ask you or the general assembly for a dime. I need the authorization to sell bonds and I’ll pay it back from the present fees we now have.” And I said, ‘That sounds great, Charlie. I want to add to that wonderful proposal. I want to build one in Currituck County, as well.” He had a mustache, and it just fell. And he tried to explain that the house wouldn’t like it, trying to talk me out of it. A great friend. And I said, “Charlie, that’s my job to convince the house.” In the end, we built both of them.
So did you have to work out some compromise, I guess.
Always have to compromise. Always.
Has that been lost in today’s political climate?
It obviously has. But there will always people of conflicting views. That’s okay. We can disagree, but we don’t have to be disagreeable.
What were some of the more contentious things you brought forth? I was always impressed at the level of environmental concern. We discussed the wind project, but the Mid-Currituck Bridge was another one. I remember talking to you before where you said you wanted filtration on the gutters — for lack of a better term — so the run off wouldn’t pollute the sound. I have a hard time believing that would’ve happened now.
I had it in the design. Like, Bonner Bridge, I sat down with Fish and Wildlife — Mike Ryan, Mike Murray from the National Park and the DOT chief of staff. I said “Guys, why don’t we leave the old Bonner Bridge, all but the navigation parts, leave it for the people?” The artists. The photographers. The handicapped person. The fisherman. And the biker. The walker. And then, leave that gap and build a separate 15-foot-wide bike trail over top of the water. The kind of facility for the common man to meet the rich man and the poor man. All people love these kinds of facilities. All people. Sunsets. Sunrises. That’s one of the greatest vistas in the world. You get the sun just right – that is an incredible view.
I think my biggest fear living here is the balance between encouraging visitation and preserving the natural elements that make it such a mecca to begin with. That’s probably the greatest challenge of all.
One of my favorite accomplishments, I had to fight the bureaucracy to make the legislative building green. We put in the grass area, the green area of the lawn, I had them put cisterns underground. Big concrete tanks, like 40,000-plus gallons. When it rained we stored the water. That once went into the Neuse River. No longer. It goes underground and in the dry season it sprinkles the lawn. And then, I took out half the light bulbs in the senate chamber where we debate. And I put in LEDs. and didn’t say a word to a damn soul. Debate went on and on. And one day I stood up and I said, “Fellow members, fellow colleagues, have you noticed any difference in the lighting as you read your motions?” Not a word. They were thinking to themselves, “What is the president talking about?” And I said, “All of you who say you couldn’t read under LED, all of you who dislike LED, I’m here to tell you this half has been under LED lighting and mine has been under incandescent lighting. Also, I put motion detectors on the lights in all the bathrooms.” One member stood up and said,” I’m witness to that fact! I was sitting on the throne reading the paper and the lights went off. And I couldn’t get up to hit the motion beam.” [Laughs.] Then I announced we were now saving about $40,000 a year on electricity. I enjoyed that moment.
Do you think those policies would still be adopted under the current assembly?
Maybe. And maybe not. But what we were doing at the time, no one in America was doing. Nobody. We couldn’t find one assembly that was collecting the water off their roof.
What year was that?
Have you met Amy Fulk that was my chief of staff? Would you like to? Hold on. She knows more abut what we did than anyone I know. Powerful lady. I put women in charge when it was out of style. In fact my first Chief of Staff, Norma Mills, was the first woman to ever be a chief of staff, number one, in any office of government in North Carolina. [Dials phone, and gets a voice mail.] “Amy, when you get through finishing off that that bottle of wine, would you give your old boss a call? Thank you.” [Grins.]
That’s funny. But you obviously made conservation an important part of your legacy. And environmental issues. The current legislature has done the opposite. The whole decision not to consider sea level rise. Do you think that was a black eye for the state?
No. You know, I have looked at the 30-year review. That does not bother me. 100 years, I don’t believe you predict 100 years out. And also, people in general will not focus on 100 years. They can’t focus on a week.
But isn’t it the job of legislative bodies to look 100 years ahead? Miami’s certainly dealing with sea level rise now and they’re taking these steps. Other communities around us are using the 3-meter standard. CSI is currently studying sea level rise in our sound. It seems shortsighted. And it seems like the people who make money on development are telling the scientific community what to do.
There are elements that will definitely do that. No question. There are some who develop land that would not want any review. None. Even 5 years. I believe it was a good compromise. 30 years is okay with me. As long as it’s independent and not anti-climate change or extreme climate change. Science.
I think in a lot of, what happened down south has made it impossible to have an environmental viewpoint — at least in Dare County. And whatever the SELC and Audubon’s motives were, the result is it’s impossible to say “This is bad for the environment” without people shouting you down or tuning you out.
You mentioned Audubon. We just drove past that piece of Audubon property they sold. The last connecting piece to the ocean. Sad to see. What’d I tell you? Money. Money. Look around. This is beautiful, Matt. Trees are beautiful. No power lines.
There you go: that’s one thing that gets people riled up — and maybe you can explain it — is what’s up with those huge power poles down the bypass? Why couldn’t they bury those things?
I’m with you. We have to bet it cost more. I would like a great debate on the power line costs going underground — the costs and the benefit. The benefit would be no power lines in a major hurricane laying the ground. But whatever we paid, to bury it would be nominal, a surcharge on our power bills. Look around, none!
I agree. I think Duck, Nags Head and Manteo are the three towns with the best sense of vision. They know what they are and what they’re trying to convey as a community. The others seem to be less, I don’t know what it is. Kill Devil Hills, maybe it’s in their DNA to have that ‘fast buck’ mentality, for lack of a better term. But there’s always that debate between investment and waste. One person’s investment is another person’s waste. And improving and selling out. How do you jive those values. I now I pay $100 a year for recycling. I’ve been told that if that had been folded into our waste costs, it would be less. And we’d have less trash. But then we’re also a unique community in the sense we have such huge differences in population between summer and winter and the type of services we need to provide.
I believe Dare County and all the towns missed the boat in the total recycling effort. I would like to see us stand up and show h world that we really care. What we now sell is clean water. But that water [points to Currituck sound] is dirty right now, Currituck sound. When I was in office, it was pretty darn dirty.
True. But the more you build the harder it is to protect water quality on both sides. I know 20 years go when I went surfing I didn’t worry about runoff nearly as much as now.
Well, you think about it. I do, too.
The plastic bag ban must be something you’re proud of. Dare County beat San Francisco by years. Of course, that’s a county not statewide, but is there hope for it to go statewide?
In time. The new population is growing in Raleigh, Chapel Hill and Durham, Greensboro and Winston Salem, Asheville Charlotte, Wilmington. They’re an educated population. They read. They will create that change.
It comes back to education and being informed. I worry more people are misinformed now. Look at Facebook and you see people just repeat things they’ve heard on both sides. In some ways the internet has been a great educator but in others it’s a real misinformer.
But what we’re seeing is the thoughts that were once hidden. They are now transparent. Now when it rubs us wrong, we don’t care for it. If it’s our opinion, we embrace it . I’m like you: I wish their names would be attached. Then you would see the toned down opinion. It wouldn’t be so blatantly wrong.
Every once in a while I read stuff and I think limiting the vote sounds like a good idea….
Oh damn…
…generally, when I disagree. It’s amazing how protective people get over the electoral process but only when they disagree. Everyone has the right to their own opinion, as long as its yours.
You’ve always seen a mixture of that.
What’s your vision of this place in 50 years then?
I always try to think positively. I believe Southern Shores, where we are now, will always have this look. Duck will protect theirs as well. Dare county, Kill Devil — we are so family oriented, I don’t believe that can be changed.
So you don’t worry about building heights or anything. Like when Kill Devil Hills flirted with raising the oceanfront a few years ago.
From what I see now, very limited heights. Anywhere. I hope, very much hope, that remains. That being said, I believe it would be prudent to let any house go up one story. Not for space. Not for more bathrooms. Not for more bedrooms. But for rising sea level. I believe if you lifted whatever existed, let them build higher but with the same building limits. Not adding stories, but adding height for space underneath for storm water to move in and out.
That’s one of the lessons from Sandy in some ways. I know in New Jersey they’re making them do that to rebuild. But I think Manteo’s going to have the hardest time with that because of so much brick. What about Hatteras? The bridge? Route 12? The bridge plan now is a 50 year plan with four hot spots. What’s the future for that? What are the up against?
I believe beach nourishment and adding to the bridge connections would be prudent. There’s a lot of unwanted sand in Oregon Inlet. Move that sand to the beach. Always, always, have a nourishment plan.
Do you worry about the battle for sourcing sand? In Florida they’ve had problems finding sand for all the towns.
I’ve never heard that. I’ve always been told by my reviewers that we have ungodly sources of sand out here. But I wasn’t ware of Florida.
I’m not sure about Carolina. But I know the discussion over Cape Lookout has some places nervous that they’ll take their sand.
But they don’t have good supply. They have pebbles and chips, they don’t have sand.
I’m still suspicious. But I give Nags Head credit for doing it right. I know people talk about the sand bypass for the inlet but we don’t have the tax base that the Gold Coast of Australia or South Florida has. I think in many ways people cling to solutions that won’t work here. My buddy at he Army Corps said, “Nourishment works as long as you have money.” But it’s definitely better than hardened structures. The irony of the inlet is that the jetty that’s on the inlet is rubbing Hatteras Island the sand it needs.
That is not so. Not at all. The history of erosion on the beaches of Hatteras predates that by far. There’s always been that aggressive erosion before the southern jetty.
The other thing you hear people say is that the nourishment is filling in the inlet.
My answer there is we didn’t have any beach nourishment four years ago and the inlet has been filling in for thirty years. The data will tell you that. I would say, always check the history on statements. Whoever made that statement obviously looks uninformed.
I think people assume causal relationships. To me the sand we dumped would be inconsequential compared to what’s out there. But there’s also conflict of interests — opposing interests. I guess that the reason for government.
There always will be opposing interests. You have to filter what you’re child says. You have to triple filter elected person. [smiles]
I do think people gauge groups’ emotions and galvanize them in that way. So if you’re anti nourishment, you can rally fishermen to your cause by saying the sand clogs the inlet. So you do have to check the sources and follow the money…
And the passion. The money and passion have the same goals. The money is I want physical things. And the passion side, is I want natural things. But they’re equal in how people on both sides will not be so truthful about what they say. Husband and wife get married, half will not be able to live among their opinions in one house and will separate. People make choices. That’s what life is: simply choices.
We keep talking about the electoral process here. Less than 11% of people 18 to 34 voted last time around. Maybe they’re disillusioned — like you said with the Frank-Dodd evisceration. What do you say to those people who aren’t making any choice. Who feel like ‘”why bother?”
I always say, your opinion is not heard if you don’t vote. Maybe if you look in the final total — Thom Tillis won by 75,000 votes. Yes, your vote would not have changed that election. But maybe— just maybe — one day that one single vote on the board of education or the town council, maybe that would turn the tide. Maybe.
Obviously Beverly Boswell beat Max Dutton by 30 votes. Stan White lost by 21 votes two years ago.
But that’s a pretty simplistic answer. The reason to vote is much deeper than that. I once was voting in Manteo. I was walking in to vote and this woman outside the voting building screamed, “Yes! I did it!” Then she turned and said, “Kiss my ass.” She had obviously stated her protest. And it overjoyed her. That always gave me a chuckle. But it’s such a fulfilling day. Such a wonderful chance of expression. Your vote counts as much as Bill and Melinda gates’ votes. The one time we’re all equal. No one gets greater value for their vote than anyone else.
Before we go further, I want to follow up on our past interview and make sure I’m correct. You said George W. Bush came here and there was an issue with rockfish?
He didn’t come here, he was in Concord, North Carolina. He had banned the commercial take of Rockfish in federal waters. I gave him a letter, explaining why that weren’t helpful. He responded — the Bushes always responded — but they were never helpful. They would respond. Obama never responded. Now Bill Clinton really responded on the lighthouse.
Why was saying we should’ve been part of the commonwealth of Virginia a mistake? Did it just make things harder to get done?
Awfully difficult. For about two years I was a Benedict Arnold. But always look forward. Forget he past. I naturally like people, even people who do not like me. I have no enemy in the world. None. I wish no evil upon any man. Now, I realize that you have to fight. When someone blows up people — for whatever the reason — they have to be brought to justice. I strongly believe in the death penalty. There are certain crimes that are so hideous, not only is the taking of his life justified, it finally brings closure to the family. Now very rare. Extremely rare. If 500 people are murdered in North Carolina each year, maybe 2 would even rise to that level of death penalty.
I try to put my self in the shoes of the victims’ family. That is my foundation. When the bill had been introduced to get rid of the death penalty, a victim’s father told a group of us, “You, don’t know what it’s like, what my daughter went through in the few hours she was sexually assaulted before they totally dismembered her while she was alive.” I don’t want any of the details printed— it’s so gruesome — but he was so emotional and he wanted some closure. He didn’t want this guy writing a book. He didn’t want this guy writing a letter to him saying, “I’ve found Christ, will you forgive me?” And Timothy McVeigh can’t do that now to those 800-some families. Can’t do it. He’s gone.
That’s a point.
An extreme point. Now, passion killing? No. And if you’re not totally convinced – totally convinced — that it occurred, then no. DNA is so beneficial today for the wrongly convicted.
So how’d you win back the state’s trust over that two years? You obviously still don’t feel we should be part of Virginia.
It sort of dissolved on its own. And no I don’t. But at the time we were not the state that we now are. If you get your grades in order, and you are poor and have no income, family has nothing, UNC Chapel Hill, one of the major schools in the world, will pay for your education free. Room, board, books, tuition – everything. Free. Now, you have to have the grades to get in. But everyone from low income is free.
You also mentioned there’s a shift toward urbanization. Does that shift ever come back toe the coast – or does it go to some other part of the state?
The new speaker of the house, Tim Moore, is from rural North Carolina. King’s Mountain. That’s in the western part of the state. Cleveland County. Also, the president of the Senate, Phil Berger, is from rural North Carolina, Rockingham County.
So they’re likely to bring those issues to the table.
Yes.
So it really is a matter of who you put forth as your representative. It’s cycles basically.
I met bill cook and found him to be very open and accepting. I didn’t vote for Bill Cook, he knows that. I was for Stan White. But that didn’t seem to bother him one bit.
I don’t like that he voted for fracking bill. And I don’t like that he’s for offshore drilling. I don’t see how injecting wastewater beneath our aquifer and drilling offshore helps his constituents. Both are shortsighted at best.
Not for oil derricks, not at all. I think you can do fracking. But here’s a caveat. The value of gas and oil to the common man overwhelms me. The price of gasoline now, the heating bill, manufacturing bill, restaurant gas bills — energy is so low in America now because of fracking. the little man is winning. The oil company is losing, the big guy. What I would do, my wish would be, that they fix the problems. Fix it. Disclose everything in the wastewater. Be transparent, be safe. And use new technology.
The transparency of the chemicals, for me it comes down to the ash ponds, and the tar river, or Fukushima, there’s a pattern of energy companies either cutting corners, human error or simple act of god stuff, an accident happens. And then the people who live there get screwed.
There’s a danger in that. There is. But right now the Middle East is not controlling the price of energy in America, the first time. And that’s because of fracking. So fix fracking, don’t get rid of it. Fix it. I equate that to Obamacare. On the liberal side of politics is Obamacare, on the right side is Fracking What I say to both is “fix it.” Don’t crash it. Fix it. Fix health care, fix fracking. Fix problems. And let the generosity of the solution benefit our people.
I’m for universal heath care.
I’m for single payer system. Everybody’s covered. A little co-pay. For the poor people, no. But you and I, we have to control the abuses of mothers. Mothers now take their little ones to the emergency room and abuse it for a little sniffle.
I don’t know how much you care to get into this, but ALS is something you’ve been dealing with. How are you handling it?. I’d assume from talking to you it must be frustrating, if for nothing else then just being able to communicate.
Not really. It is what it is. I always look at the condition of other people who are much worse of than me. A child with cancer, dying. A mother with breast cancer at 44 years old. Two children. How frightening is that? I’m 67. Who got the worse deal? Me or her? Her. Life expectancy in Afghanistan is 45 years of age. I got a pretty good deal when you look at it like that. I have no fear of death. None. And I am what I am.
What piece of advice would you give people moving forward?
Face challenges head on. Do not ignore them. But we all procrastinate. And people fear change. But people here, make this place. The beauty, the pure beauty out here of nature, is a blessing. But it’s the people that have moved here and have lived here that are so passionate about issues. Every Saturday some benefit, something going on. Incredible. I mean, incredible people. You see that dumpster? Some guy, some average guy, is making his Christmas in December out here. When I see dumpsters and painters, carpet layers, I know everything is okay. The men that I know and love — and the women — have an opportunity here that you don’t have anywhere else. By combining the work and the beauty. You can go to Raleigh and make more money. You won’t see the same sunset. You won’t feel or hear the sweet voice of Nature. You won’t do it. You also become part of the crowd that really, truly separate themselves. In Raleigh, Charlotte you have a lot of wealth. A lot. A lot of private schools. Now, I believe in choice in schools. But here you are blessed with good community schools of high caliber.
I agree. I wonder if people here realize how good they have it. Every time I worry about the character of the Outer Bank changing, I remind myself that. I’m no religious person, but I do feel like here, we connect with nature. you’re forced to recognize there is something larger than yourself. You have to humble yourself.
I’ll tell you a little story. I was surfing in South Nags Head one summer. Not much wave. But I loved it anyhow. It was just me, warm in the water. And I was in a school of bait fish. Little menhaden, maybe. I don’t know what they were, but they were schooling. I was sitting quietly on the board and I laid down the board. One of those slick calm days. A little swell was running. Not enough to get my fat ass moving. [Grins.] I had a 10-4 Dewey Weber surfboard. I loved that board. Bought it at Western Auto in Virginia Beach. A pelican, you rarely saw pelicans then. We didn’t have them. But a pelican flew down out of the sky right next to me. Scooped up a pouch of fish. And me and him looked each other in the eye. Ill never forget that. Never.
I love those days when the surf is pumping and. I look around and see everyone I know playing a little hooky and remember why I live here. I’m out of questions. What else we can talk about?
These light poles. They need to go underground. [Smiles.]
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
DEEP THOUGHTS
How does living near water make our brains function better? Dr. Wallace Nichols discusses the importance of being “blue minded.”
On this thin strip of sand at the edge of a continent, we have a deep connection to the sea. We walk beside it. We wade in it. We ride, float and bathe in it. Whether visitors, residents or natives, that relationship draws us ever closer. But why? And what exactly does water do to our brains?
“Water quiets all the noise, all the distractions, and connects you to your own thoughts,” explains marine biologist and author Dr. Wallace J. Nichols. “Water primes us to feel certain things without letting us know it inspired the relevant neurochemical reactions.”
In fact, Nichols believes just being near the sea positively changes our brain’s chemistry. Gone is what he calls the “red mind” — the one that’s always busy, distracted and hyper-connected. Instead, we plunge into “blue mind” mode: a mildly meditative state primed for moments of intense creativity, clarity and innovative thinking, as well as increased feelings of calm self-reflection.
In his recent best-selling book — Blue Mind: The Surprising Science That Show How Being Near, In, On, or Under Water can Make You Happier, Healthier, More Connected, and Better at What You Do — Nichols details exactly how the ebb and flow of the tide is deeply ingrained in our psyche from distant atolls to right here at home. In fact, the first sentence starts with a scene from Jennette’s Pier.
“What I’ve tried to do with the Blue Mind project is try to teach people a bit more about themselves so they can live their lives even better than they do,” he continues. “And do it in a way that is hopefully good for the water itself.”
We caught up with Dr. Nichols between scoring the cover of Outside Magazine and a 100-city world tour to find out how the ocean can provide feelings of awe, wonder and solitude — and why Outer Bankers may be more “blue minded” than others. What follows is the full transcript of the interview featured in Winter 2014’s Issue 3.4.—Michelle Wagner
MILEPOST: Where do you live now?
I live outside of a town called Davenport, Calif. The town is really small so I guess you could say we don’t live in a town. It’s a region of California we call the Slow Coast. It is south of San Francisco and north of Monterey and Santa Cruz. If you are in the Silicon Valley, if you go over the mountains to the coast you would be on the Slow Coast. It’s very sparsely populated with a lot of wildlife, organic farms and ranches. There’s a lot of good surf here and good mountain biking.
It sounds like a beautiful place to live.
Yes, it’s really great.
Where are you from originally?
I was born in Manhattan, N.Y. Until my freshman year in high school, I grew up on the East Coast. I moved to the Chicago area and from there I kind of lived all over. I went to college in Indiana, received my master’s degree in North Carolina at Duke and studied in the marine lab in Beaufort, N.C. I received my PhD. at the University of Arizona. I spent a lot of time living and working in Mexico. I moved around a lot, so I call myself a North American. I lived in Mexico, on the East Coast, the West Coast and the Midwest.
What would you describe as your own personal connection with the water?
Probably like many people, I have great childhood memories of being in the water, whether it was a swimming pool, a creek or at the ocean. I associated the water with summer vacation or any kind of holiday or fun event. At a young age, I was really into biology and animals and Jacques Cousteau. I remember thinking, “Wow, it would be great to be a marine biologist.” But it was not like it is now. If kids now say they want to be a marine biologist, parents and kids can go on the Internet and discover everything. They can plug right in. When I was young, Jacques Cousteau had that job and it was taken care of. No one would say, “Oh, you should be a marine biologist.” Really, no one advised a kid like me to pursue that career, at least not in the world that I was living in. You were steered toward more practical vocations like being a doctor, lawyer, business person or engineer. But in college, I kind of discovered that marine biology was what I really wanted to do. I knew I loved being out in nature, so I figured out a way to connect the dots of my interests and passions. In a way, you look backwards and it all makes sense. From where I am sitting now, it looks like a nice path, from jobhood to this book. But it didn’t always feel that way.
Was there a particular event in college that steered you down the path of marine biology, neuroscience and ocean conservation?
When I was in college at De Paul University in Indiana, I knew I really liked the outdoors. My friends nicknamed me “mountain man,” even though there were no mountains. I was always going off with my kayak and my dog and exploring what Indiana had to offer in terms of rivers and quarries and open space during all of the seasons. It wasn’t backcountry mountaineering, but it was Indiana’s version of that. I’d go hiking through the snow and cross rivers with my dog and go winter camping, exploring the waterways and rivers and quarries. I’d go scuba diving and snorkeling and camping, hiking and floating rivers.
During my sophomore year, I was asked to visit a nursing home near campus where a young woman spent the last 15 years after being in a serious car accident. She had lost her memory but had been a musician, specifically a guitar player and I play guitar. So I spent Wednesday afternoons for eight months doing guitar lessons with Barbara. As we played together, sometimes it would help bring back memories and it was almost like magic, but it wasn’t magic. It was neuroscience. And I remember I would spend an hour or so with her and half of it or more would not be playing music. It would be talking about what the music had triggered. The nurses started paying attention and were all pretty excited about it. I would go back to campus and try to figure out what the heck was going on. Nobody on campus studied neuroscience per se. And there really wasn’t a lot of information even in the library on neuroscience and music. That work has come more recently, but I was fascinated by what was happening in the real world. That experience stuck with me ever since and that became my question for water. If we can study the brain on music and the brain on lots of things — the brain on chocolate, the brain on red wine, the brain on stress — then why not the brain on water. I thought that maybe there was a book in the library I could read that would answer these questions that I could apply to my work for the ocean in conservation biology. I started looking for that book.
And you didn’t find it.
I didn’t find it. And then I tried to get someone to write that book. I was unsuccessful, but I really tried. I didn’t think that I was the person to do it, so I tried to convince grad students and post ops and neuroscientists. I even wrote a proposal and tried to give it away. It just didn’t hit the sweet spot for anybody at that point in time. The proposal turned into a book proposal and the publisher said it was really great. One editor in particular looked on, who loves the water and is a swimmer, and said it was terrific and I was the person to do it. So I dove in — no pun intended. That’s kind of how that chapter began.
How would you describe the Blue Mind project to someone who has never heard of it?
I would say what we are trying to do is better understand why being near, in, on or under water makes us feel the way it does. For a lot of people, that is a good feeling. But it is not exclusively relaxing, blissful or happy. It’s mixed with other things. It can be melancholy, it can be scary. It’s all of that, depending on what is happening with the water and with us. So whatever you bring with you to the edge of the water is certainly a part of how the water will make you feel. In a way, it’s a mirror. But also it is biologically significant. Blue Mind is about understanding something about ourselves. People ask what is this book is about and the short answer is it is about you.
The book is about you, specifically about you. And if someone picks it up and it really doesn’t make any sense whatsoever, well that’s fine. Then it is not about them — but chances are it is on some level. I am thinking about someone like my mom who doesn’t really like getting in the water very much, ironically. But she loves being by the water and will take vacations by water every time, or will get on cruise or go to Hawaii and loves it because of the water. Even my mom – who is scared to get her face wet — loves the water. So this is a book about her, too. What I’ve tried to do with this project and with this book and subsequent conversations like this is to teach people a bit more about themselves so they can live their lives even better than they do – and do it in a way that is hopefully good for the water itself.
The broader idea is if we better understand how much this water is worth, even in a non-monetary way, perhaps that will turn into caring more and fighting more. People will get through this conversation or get through reading the book and say, “wow, that’s right. The water around me helps me in ways that maybe I didn’t fully appreciate. So I want to make sure it can continue to do so.” That may mean joining an organization or starting an organization, getting more involved in cleaning up the beach or cleaning up the water itself, working on sea turtle conservation or whatever the way in is. Or it could be through education by bringing kids to the water. There are lots of ways. You can become politically involved or physically involved in taking care of our coasts and oceans and waterways. I like to approach it in an ecumenical way. To ask whether you are an environmentalist or not, that’s not helpful. To ask whether someone is from a blue state or a red state is not helpful either. It’s a nonpolitical, ecumenical approach in a way. And that is the goal — to say that your water, whatever it is, gives you so much that you may not have been aware of or you may have been aware of but didn’t know it had an explanation. So let’s be sure that it can continue to do that, or let’s be sure that we can restore its’ ability to do that. I don’t think this is a prescriptive book. It’s not a do this, do this book.
People often say, “What are the three things we can do for the water,” and my answer for the last several years has been, “What do you think?” and then I just listen and guess what? Everyone has a good answer. Everyone, even the person who asks that question, always has a great answer. And their answer is always better than any one I could have offered because it comes from a real connection to their place, wherever it is. If I make three broad generic recommendations, they wouldn’t be nearly as good as what they would come up with for themselves.
Is that because it is more meaningful to them?
Yes, because it will make sense and will be personal. It may sound like I am punting on the question, but I’d be more than happy to give them three ideas that would work. But if the goal is to actually lead to something practical and lead to real action, that’s much better. While I’ve been doing this book tour, I start out every book talk or keynote by asking people to turn to the person next to them that they know the least and tell them about the water they love the most. And then I let the audience talk and depending on how into it they are, it could go on for a while. All the sudden the room erupts with all these incredible little conversations between people. When I bring the group back together, I ask some volunteers to tell me what they just heard — not what you just said, but what you just heard and it’s incredible. People stand up and tell the story they just heard from the stranger sitting next to them. Now the room is sort of on a whole different level of “ready to talk about this” because people have just shared one of their best stories, one of their favorite places and it’s beautiful. It’s a different approach and now everyone is engaged. They have some water in mind they want to be sure is well, is healthy, is protected and is being restored because it connects to their nostalgia and their memories and different parts of their lives and people they love. That’s kind of where this is coming from. If we hope to build a movement to take care of the water parts of the world, we are convinced that fear and guilt and a ton of information are probably not our best tools. They are useful. We do need information and sometimes just telling us the shocking truth of what is ahead has to happen. But equally as important and sometimes even more motivating is going in the blue mind direction rather than the red mind direction.
Here on the Outer Banks, this book is about us. We have water everywhere. I was wondering what drew you to the Outer Banks and to open your book with an experience you had at Jennette’s Pier.
As a grad student, the Outer Banks were in my backyard and when I lived in Beaufort, that’s where I went when I had any extra time — enough time to drive to the ferry, ferry to the Outer Banks and drive a little more to get to any of the amazing places you know. Ever since then, it’s always been one of the places in my mind when asked the question, “Where did you fall in love with water?” I can think of several places throughout my life, from childhood through yesterday and the Outer Banks was one of those bright blue spots in the story of my life. And when all the people leave is when it gets really, really good. There is the Outer Banks literally, physically, biologically and ecologically. There’s the Outer Banks as a chapter in my life, but then there is sort of the metaphor of the Outer Banks, which is such a powerful metaphor. For all those reasons, I knew this was the way to open the book.
Could you expand on the idea of the Outer Banks as a metaphor?
With the name Outer Banks, people who don’t even know what that is…they do because of the name. Just saying the Outer Banks evokes something in everyone. It’s a great name. Even people who haven’t been there but have seen a documentary or National Geographic or the Travel Channel have a sense of what that means. It’s a place that has water on all sides, literally wherever you are. Water is in front of you and in back of you and to the north and south. And if you move in any direction, you will cross water in the very near future. You can be on Maui and drive inland and go for quite a while. But on the Outer Banks, you can’t go far in any direction without being on the edge, being on the banks of the water. So in the world, it is unique in that way. It’s exposed to the water in every way. If the weather gets bad, you are out there. If the weather’s good, you are out there. But exposure brings with it psychological side. Your desire to spend your life or part of your life in a place that is like that requires a personality. It’s something that pulls people who decide to stay or go there even for a visit. I wrote a piece before the book came out called the Outer Banks of the Mind. It started in the same way and was a bit of a warm up for the book. Some people say the new frontier of exploration on earth is the deep ocean. I would say the new frontier is the deep mind, the deep brain. And understanding our planet will require going deeper into neuroscience and understanding ourselves.
So there’s a personal story. We did a Blue Mind conference there because of that personal connection, but also because of the proximity of neuroscientists to that region. Also it is a place that is the epitome of the blue mind conversation and not just because of the ocean and the sound, but also because of the rivers that empty into the sound.
You quote Robert Wyland in your book when he says, “The ocean stirs the heart, inspires the imagination and brings eternal joy to the soul.” Here on the Outer Banks we have a thriving creative community. Would it be fair to attribute this to our close proximity to water?
In talking to people who are creative or make a living from their creativity is that there is this thing people describe as some kind of “aha” moment when the inspiration seems to fall out of the sky and land like rain. But it doesn’t fall out of the sky. It comes from within. But setting the stage for that to happen is important and that includes being minimally distracted and being freed of the micro-problems we have to solve throughout the day. Being freed of those important things is part of allowing for new ides to happen. And our physical surroundings can help that process. It doesn’t mean you can’t be creative and live in downtown New York City. Of course you can. Lots of people do, but sometimes getting away from that and taking a break in a place like the Outer Banks can free up people’s minds to be more creative.
Everyone needs to step away from the red mind and get their blue mind on and allow their brain to think differently and come up with new ideas. For a lot of people that requires stepping back and turning off the distractions – the background noise. Literally, the noise — the visual stimulation, the auditory stimulation and the physical stimulation. If you are standing on Jennette’s Pier looking out to the north and the south, and even east and west and straight down and straight up, it’s a much simpler field of view. That allows the part of your brain that processes all the visual input to have a break and have a rest. And your auditory center of the brain, assuming there isn’t a boom box on the bench next to you, is listening to the sound of the waves. So it is also simplified. There’s been a lot of research on rhythm and the brain. But what you are not hearing are voices, the auditory center of your brain is not processing language. It takes a break. And if you are floating and the water’s nice and warm and not rough, you are not dealing with gravity because your brain also has to keep you balanced when you are on land and coordinated. We take for granted what our brains have to do and if it stops, you fall. Your brain is doing it all the time in tiny little ways and big ways so that you can just stand up. But when you are floating, it is a little restful.
What does that mean for the people who live here that have this all the time?
What often happens in all aspects of our lives is that we acclimate to the world around us. We can become used to being by the ocean. And I find that people on our coast who go away and then they come back and they appreciate it more and see the ocean through kind of new eyes. You can do that without going away, too. You can say, “You know, I am going to appreciate the Outer Banks more just by deciding to.” And we can do that. Our brains are amazing if we pay attention and see things that are right in front of our noses by deciding to. What we’ve done this summer with the book tour, called 100 Days of Blue, is ask people wherever they are to pay attention to their water everyday – to get in it, to get on it, to get near it, to look at it, touch it, swim in it, paddle. If you are living on the Outer Banks and you are a realtor, or a teacher, or doctor or writer, you can get in your routine and not see it the way you did when you first arrived or when you were a child. Part of the reason that being out by the water and all its’ simplicity is relaxing is that you are not doing that processing of information, visual or auditory. It allows your brain to go into what is called a default mode and after you get to the default mode, you begin to do self-referential thinking, which is innovative, insightful and creative thinking. The default mode gives you the ability to do more of that. And that’s when people feel like they have that “ah ha” moment. So while you’re in the water, the quality of your thoughts is different.
So if we re able to better appreciate the water we live near, we could benefit more from it?
Yes, especially if you pay attention when you get in the water or when you are near the water to what you are getting from that experience. You are getting exercise, right. You’re burning calories if you are exercising, so you can put that in your app. But what you are also doing is stress reduction. Cortisol levels are dropping. You are boosting your creativity and you are protecting your brain in a sense. You are building memories which become nostalgia. And if you are out there with someone, you are building social connections.
And this could apply to any activity in or near the water?
Yes, even walking on the beach and having a conversation with a co-worker or friend or family member or someone you are falling in love with. That context enhances your relationship, it enhances the conversation. And if that water is stinky and nasty and sad and dead, well then that’s a lot harder to deal with. You probably wouldn’t go to it for a walk. I’ve been places where the river running through the town was nasty. People didn’t go for a walk by the river, but then when the river gets cleaned up, they do. That makes life in that town or city better — significantly better. People will come there for vacation and the people who are from there will have a better quality of life because they have a place to go to reduce their stress. They also have a place to go to fall in love or go on a romantic date. They have a place to take their kids to form memory and nostalgia and do all of that better. So now there is another impetus, another driver for cleaning up the river. Restoring the river and protecting it and making it accessible is a key. One of the things I talk about is access. And access means physical access, meaning there’s a path between the parking lot and the beach or between the city and the edge of the river so you can get there. It also means that if you have a physical limitation, you can get there, so there’s a facility that allows you to get there. Finally, when you get there, access means it’s not polluted. Pollution doesn’t preclude access. The water needs to be healthy enough that you can go for a swim. If there is something like an oil spill or a bunch of trash, even if you can walk to the beach and get to the edge, you can’t get in the water. You shouldn’t get in the water. The third key access is perception. You can physically get there, the water is clean and healthy, but culturally you perceive that your family or your people don’t swim. Or what we are finding recently is you get to the edge of the water, you have access, the water is healthy… but you have a smart phone in your hand and you are afraid to leave it on the beach. So your perception is, “I can’t go in the water because I don’t want to get my phone wet” or “I can’t get in the water because I don’t want someone to steal my phone.” That perception keeps you out of the water.
I am not anti-technology, but if the technology keeps you in red mind and doesn’t allow you to access blue mind, then maybe it’s time to come up with a better plan. That could mean just lock your phone in your glove box or don’t bring it in the first place. Just leave it at home. For your day, week or a vacation, have technology-free periods where you say I am really going to the beach to unplug, which means leaving anything tethered back in the office, or at home or in the car. We need to be aware of that and say this is why I’m here. I read this book and now I understand that part of why I am going to the beach is to have some contemplative time and to really, really truly relax. If I bring my technology with me, then that’s less likely to happen because I will be walking down the beach reading my text messages or answering work emails and I won’t be getting my blue mind on. If you really want to do that, you need to turn it off, put it away or leave it at home. That allows us to take a spontaneous swim or a wave when you don’t have that $300 phone in our pocket.
The science has found that we are happier near, in, on or under the water. I was wondering if there was a tier system to that? Are scuba divers happier than surfers, who are happier than fishermen, who are happier than sunbathers?
It’s hard to rank and compare one to the other. So I would say there’s a biological component, there’s a cultural component and then there’s a personal history component. Each of us have a different mix of those three things, each has a different blue mind thumb print . Some scuba divers obviously are getting much more out of their time in the water than other scuba divers. And some surfers are so blissed out after surfing and some are not. I would say on par, on average across the board, people who spend time by water and who live by it report a higher level of life satisfaction and happiness. That’s what the research says. And you can drill down into different groups. I meet people who spend time by water or on the water and they bring a very type A agenda to the water. They are getting a different experience than someone who says this is my hour of bliss. That person is going to get a very different experience out of that hour of water time. So it varies greatly. You’ve got scuba divers who are meticulous measuring everything and they have their checklists and their dive logs and cutting edge gear and it’s a competitive sport.
Each of us brings a different set. We are all different genetically which means our brains are responding differently. We have a different life history and sometimes there’s a fear of water and sometimes there’s a deep fondness and sometimes it’s a mix. And then culturally, we each have a different context for our relationship with water. You may be from a family with a surfing tradition, or a fishing or boating tradition and so there’s a cultural expectation. All of that plays together.
And you bring that all to the water with you?
Yes, for each of us it’s different. But there are some things that are similar. People will say, “What’s it worth talking about anyway if we are each different. What can we say that will be useful and relevant to a lot of people.” There’s a biological component that is very real. Part of it comes down to the fact that we need water to get through the next few days. If I said you are not going to have access to water for the next few days, you are going to be in trouble, super big trouble. And so on a very, very, very basic biological level, the signal of water puts us at ease. If it’s calm water, even if it’s salt water, it kind of tricks your brain and puts you at ease. And that’s a deep biological response. We don’t talk about it that way, we don’t think about it that way, we don’t advertise it that way but that’s part of what’s going on.
If you can look at the water and its just water, that’s fine. If you can look at the water and there are whales and dolphins and birds and fish jumping, you know that there are healthy turtles out there that are coming up and that the reef is healthy, well then that’s worth more in our lives. It’s not just the surface of the water. It’s the whole thing. If the water’s polluted and you know it, you’re not going to want to look at it. It will make you sad, not happy. It will stress you out rather than relax you. That’s our challenge. How do we keep the water healthy, how do we reduce pollution, how do we keep our beaches clean and make sure the wildlife is abundant and healthy, too. I think we know the answer to those questions. Back to when people say, well what do we do? Well, you don’t throw your trash on the beach. Make sure the pollution is taken care of.
Our Outer Banks community here really connected. Could we attribute that to living where we do and the fact that we are surrounded by water?
Being on an island surrounded by water, how could it not form the personality of the community. It most clearly is a major influence on how people live in the physical sense, but also how they live in the social and emotional sense. It is the Outer Banks reality and the Outer Banks metaphor. If you are on the Outer Banks, you better know your neighbor. If you are on the outer banks of anything, the outer banks of Antarctica or the Outer Banks of North Carolina, you better know your neighbor. There is that aspect certainly. What the research is finding is that when you experience awe and wonder, it changes your brain. In ten minutes, you could be at the ocean and be experiencing awe, or tonight at sunset or in the middle of night you could get out there and experience awe. So the experience of awe has a physiological component. And when your brain is experiencing awe and wonder, it sets you up for compassion and empathy. And compassion and empathy is basically about thinking about more than yourself. So if you live in a place that is full of awe and wonder and you practice paying attention to that, that can set you up to be more compassionate and more empathetic. It’s true. Some people describe it as a spiritual experience and some people describe it as wonderful. To experience awe and wonder and the feeling like here’s something bigger than themselves, feeling one with themselves and one with their community, one with their island, one with the ocean – those are real feelings and special and rare. They are increasingly rare because of the reasons we talked about earlier, because people have their heads down in their screens. And kids are unfortunately experiencing less awe because of those screens and not learning how to experience solitude. So one of the things a place like the Outer Banks can offer if it’s done mindfully is it can be a place where people can go, particularly young people, to experience awe and wonder and solitude. But you have to try because if you don’t try, you end up at the beach with your phone, taking a little selfie and then getting back in the car. If you don’t have a good guide, you may just do it that way. If you have a good guide and they say leave it behind, let’s go experience awe and wonder and solitude, that’s a gift. We need to be aware that it’s a real thing and talk about it and recognize it and do it. All those things kind of come together in a place like the Outer Banks. And then the trick is how do you do that and not have the throngs of people who are in the need of awe and wonder and solitude and blue mind and not have them overrun you – your finite space. We think about that on the Slow Coast. We need safeguards in place so the Slow Coast doesn’t just become the coast of Silicon Valley and is built up and overrun and no longer slow. I imagine that’s a challenge there on the Outer Banks, too.
What should we do here on the Outer Banks to protect that gift?
In terms of the Outer Banks, I would say you know what to do. You do. Step back from anything political, any agenda, or black-and-white argument. Just step back from that and ask, “What should we do?” Deep down you know. Not even deep down but right in the front of your brain, right in your rational prefrontal cortex. You know what to do. Take care of what you love – really take care of it. Lean in and passionately take care of the living island. And you know what that means. And everyone can answer what that means to them. And some people will say, “ OK I’ll recycle. I’ll drive less, whatever it is.” Other people will volunteer more or run for office and be a voice for the living island you are on. There are more complex issues related to development and building and setbacks. We can get really down in the weeds with all that stuff. But for this conversation, it is much more provocative to say, “You know what to do. Get in touch with your blue mind, get in touch with the emotional, the social the cognitive benefits of living where you live and work to protect that and remove the things that mess it up.” There are some people that make a living off of the things that mess it up, and that’s where the friction comes in. In the long term, the destructive activities need to go away, all of them, everywhere on earth — those things that we do that make the biggest mess. Those things have to go away one way or another, but the sooner the better. We could go down the list of the most egregious, like open pit mining and mountain top removal and dumping waste into our ocean. That’s the obvious stuff.
Tell us a little bit about the Blue Marble project.
About five years ago, we began thinking that when we talk about the ocean, there’s a lot of bad news. A lot of conversations one has begin with the ocean crisis and all the bad things we are doing. My observation is that it tunes people out and they don’t want to talk to you the next. We thought there has got to be a better way to build the blue movement to be healthier and stronger, so we started using blue marbles as a gift of thanks for doing what you do to take care of this place. And we ask people take the blue marble and pass it on. Gifts are great, little beautiful gifts are nice and unexpected gifts wonderful. A blue marble is really sweet and gratitude is powerful. It’s also a way of saying thank you to someone who maybe you’ve never said thank you to. That gesture propels itself around the world. There are a million blue marbles kind of rolling around now and there’s no way to turn the project off. It’s not directed or funded project. Anyone can jump in and get a bag of blue marbles and use them in their classroom or organization or business. You can also go to our webpage and get blue marbles with customized cards. If you get them from the website, the money goes into buying more marbles for classrooms that don’t have funds.
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
LOSE THE BLINDERS
How party politics color debate — and keep voters clueless
“Get real!” “Get informed!” “Get a clue.” Read the online discussion surrounding any hot political topic, and you’ll see a lot of tense debate over the most basic facts. For every rock-solid stat in one corner, comes a hard-hitting response from the other — often with an insult or snarky comment for extra punch. But the problem isn’t that people come to debates lacking the proper information — it’s that they enter discussions overloaded with passion.
“It’s called ‘motivated reasoning,’” says Dr. Brendan Nyhan, Assistant Professor of Government at Dartmouth College and political contributor to the Upshot section of the New York Times. “So while we like to think people start with facts and then reason to a conclusion, in a lot of cases, the factual beliefs people hold are more a result of the identities they have.”
In other words, forget “right” or “left.” It’s more like, “We’re right — you’re wrong.” And even the most indisputable evidence won’t make us think otherwise. Suddenly, it all makes sense: the college-educated teacher who won’t admit tenure can protect even one bad apple. Or the NRA member who disputes the most powerful gunshot statistics. Just about every foul-mouthed Facebook tantrum to date. But don’t get too smug. Because if you’re motivated enough to join in the conversation, there’s a good chance you’re also engaging in motivated reasoning.
“This is something we all do as human beings,” Nyhan continues. “You do it. I do it. Everybody does it. But it can become pathological when people come to hold false or unsupported beliefs and aren’t willing to listen to the evidence. That’s what we see a lot in our current politics because it is so polarized.”
With a lot of election debate on the horizon, we asked the doctor to help us figure out how to stay informed and still stay accurate — and how to best educate others without fooling ourselves. What follows is the full transcript of the interview featured in Fall 2014’s Issue 3.3.— Matt Walker
What’s your title? What’s the best way to describe you?
I’m Assistant Professor of Government at Dartmouth College. I’m also a contributor to the Upshot [section of the New York Times].
So how did you end up doing this type of research?
I used to actually do fact-checking myself. I was the cofounder of a website called Spinsanity — which ran from 2001 to 2004 — and was syndicated on Salon.com in 2002 and The Philadelphia Inquirer. And we wrote a book, too, so I was engaged in the process of trying to convince people of the facts myself and saw how hard that can be when people aren’t especially willing to listen. And then I went to graduate school at Duke and in my academic research I came back to this question of “Why is it so hard to change people’s minds?” And in particular, “Why do people hold factual beliefs that aren’t factually true?” So forget opinions. Can we just agree on the actual facts in question? And that often turns out to be a very hard problem.
Why is that? You would think certain numbers would be so obvious, it’s like the sky is blue. Why won’t people see the facts for the facts?
There are a couple of problems. The first is that in politics there are very weak incentives to a have accurate beliefs. It matters a lot more that you make an informed choice about buying a reliable car or which house you buy or what refrigerator you purchase. So accuracy matters a lot more with what consumer choices you make for your wellbeing than it does for political choices. So there’s very weak incentives for voters to be well-informed. And it’s hard for voters to keep up with everything. And in some ways I think it’s unreasonable for voters to know a lot. So this isn’t a critique of people for not having an encyclopedic knowledge of minutia. What I’m especially concerned about are people who are misinformed. So not, “I don’t know” but “I think something that’s not true, and I believe it with confidence and I’m unwilling to be dissuaded from that belief despite factual evidence to the contrary.” That’s the challenge I’m interested in.
So why is that? Well, there are different factors that contribute to it. One of the most important factors in misperceptions in politics is called “motivated reasoning.” The idea that people are biased toward information that confirms their pre-existing views and biased against information that disconfirms those views. And this is something we all do as human beings. You do it. I do it. Everybody does it. But it can become pathological when people come to hold false or unsupported beliefs and aren’t willing to listen to the evidence that there’s no basis for those claims. And that’s what we see a lot in our current politics because it is so polarized. And people’s political identities are more partisan and tribal among the people who care the most about politics than in the past.
And this isn’t everybody. There are a lot of people who don’t care about politics. But the people who are in the comments sections, who are arguing in letters to the editor the newspaper, or on social media, etc. that’s the group to whom politics is a more important part of their life and identity. And so they’re especially likely to engage in this motivated reasoning process.
And they’re the ones we’re gonna hear from the most too because they’re the ones who are most caught up in it. So even if you’re partially engaged in the debate, you look on line and see that voice.
That’s right. The media especially gets a very skewed view of the electorate because those are the people who are visible to you. The people motivated enough to engage in the political process are the ones who are at the meetings or the speeches or the events. And they’re ones who write letters or call you, etc.
Can you give me a good example of a fact that people simply won’t accept? I think of climate change. Because if 97 mechanics told you the problem was the muffler and 3 said it was the windshield, you’d fix the muffler.
Right. Or if 97 doctors told you that you had a disease that threatened your life [you would fix it.] That’s probably the issue that’s most salient for any coastal community. In terms of where misinformation matters for the world, climate change is very high on the list. We can have a discussion about the extent to which something like death panels poison the debate over health care reform. But climate change is arguably an order of magnitude more significant for the world. And I’d be interested in hearing from your experience: do the greater personal stakes for coastal communities make them more open-minded about an issue like climate change? Are they more focused on accuracy? Because that’s an abstract debate for someone who lives in Nebraska. But you might wonder whether someone who’s property could be threatened is more likely to listen to the evidence because their house could be underwater.
Actually, coastal communities are more worried about insurance it seems like because that’s a more immediate threat. On the other hand, many of these same people now love their medical insurance company because they hate Obamacare. Is that normal?
Well, our incentives drive our beliefs. And our identities drive our beliefs. The point I often try to make people in politics, in health — in all sorts of areas — is that we like to think people start with the facts and reason from there to a conclusion. But in a lot of cases the factual beliefs they hold are a result of the identities they have or the interests they have. And that’s why we shouldn’t be surprised when facts don’t change people minds. Over the past 20 or 30 years, people have said again and again: the scientific consensus is extremely strong that global warming is real and manmade. And yet, we’ve actually become more polarized in our beliefs than less. So even as the scientific evidence continues to become stronger and more detailed and more elaborate, the public opinion along partisan lines is sharper. So it’s going in the opposite direction of the scientific consensus. Why? Because not believing in climate change — or opposing policies associated with mitigating climate change — has become divided along partisan lines and people take cues from elites.
So this reminds me of another study that said people would rather be right than be informed. That the more information we get, the more divisive things become.
There’s a Dan Kahan study that’s really good on this. They did a little math problem of “Did this policy work or not?” And they showed people the numbers. And they found that when you describe it in terms of “Did this policy work in terms of a sunscreen test?” people who were better with numerical reasoning performed better. But when you describe it in terms of gun control, that mathematical advantage goes away. Because they actual reason toward their preferred conclusions as Democrats or Republicans, and not thinking about it dispassionately in term of what the numbers are telling them.
So even if you’re super smart and super good with numbers, change the topic to something you’re passionate bout, you’re as likely to flip viewpoints as much as any uninformed voter.
Sometimes more likely. Because people who read journalism often think of themselves as being informed. But being more knowledgeable and sophisticated sometimes means you have more cognitive resources to acquire what I call “viewpoint-consistent beliefs.” To hold factual beliefs that are consistent with their affiliations. So they’re more likely to have politically consistent views. And they’re more likely to have the cognitive resources to defend those views when they’re challenged. So it’s harder to change their minds. Because they’re better able to think of reasons to hold the view they want to hold. In some cases. That’s why it’s not just a question of more facts not being the answer, but it’s not a question of more education or knowledge being the answer. Because in some cases those can actually lead people in different directions. The most open-minded people are often the people who least interested in politics. And the reason they’re open minded is because they don’t have any views because they aren’t interested in politics so they don’t pay attention to it.
But they’re also less inclined to vote, too, so it doesn’t make much sense for a politician to appeal to people in the middle.
That’s right. We have this idea of this very committed swing voter who considers both sides and makes up their mind and that’s who determines elections. And it’s not that those people don’t exist, but they are very rare. People who care about politics and are engaged in politics are much more like sports fans than they are the ideal of a rational voter.
It does seem like a team thing. Where if you can’t be NRA member who’s a fiscal conservative but thinks gays should be able to marry. There’s no room for a nuanced view. But if everyone felt the same way, there’d only be two types of people. So how does that work?
Well, as you move away from the most committed, educated people, you get more heterogeneity along the lines you’re describing. So most Americans don’t have fully, 100% consistent issue positions. Every view they hold isn’t aligned with their party. But the more sophisticated voters are going to be more consistent. And because sophistication is correlated with engagement, those are also the people who are going to be the most active and the most vocal.
So do the political parties and decision makers understand this fact? I assume they must. And do they play off it? Do they want their parties to be misinformed and rabid and do they cater to that? Because you see these attack ads and the divisiveness they create. They have to know what they’re doing, right?
Yeah, we’ve seen more of an emphasis on mobilizing strategies. You’re trying to mobilize your supporters and demobilize — or demoralize — the other side. So yes, the parties are aware of who’s actually involved in politics and what they care about. In terms of misinforming people, we can’t say what they do in private or what they think, but there are certainly cases where elites say things that aren’t particularly well supported by the evidence and continue to say them and it seems to benefit them politically.
Give me a good example.
Well, the one I often use is “death panels.” It was coined by Sarah Palin. A lot of misinformation comes form elites. Whether it comes form the party itself is unclear. What is a party anyway? We could have a whole seminar on that, right? Some of my colleagues write books on that subject. But a lot of misinformation comes from elites and people take cues from elites so it can spread very rapidly. So Sarah Palin created the “death panels” myth. And within a few months an overwhelming majority of Americans had come to hear of it, and it’s still echoing. It’s still lingering. The Washington Post wrote a story about the expansion of Medicaid in Virginia right now, and people were saying, “I don’t want to sign up for health care that I qualify for because I’m worried about death panels.”
And there are no death panels, right? I mean, insurance companies are already known to deny coverage for certain illnesses or try to avoid paying for expensive treatments.
Right. People say to me, “she means rationing.” And I say, “Well, insurance companies ration all the time. If that’s death panels, we have them.” But Sarah Palin’s language is much more vivid. It’s more like “I don’t want to go in front of the death panel” — and you’d have to pull the exact quote — but it’s much more vivid. It describes government panels will decide if people live or die. And that’s just not the case. So they vary to the extent that they’re elite driven. A claim that was widely held among Democrats is the belief that Bush was implicated in the 911 attacks — the “inside job” conspiracy theory. That had limited elite support. Very few elite Democrats actually espoused that. But there are beliefs that are pushed by elites.
And I think that our political culture — and especially our journalistic culture — is insufficiently harsh on people who do that. There are very few negative reputational consequences. So we shouldn’t be surprised when people still push these things. CNN will still have you on. You’ll still get quoted in the newspaper. You’re still on TV. And a lot of the stories that cover your claims will be written in a framework that suggests your story might be true. They don’t adequately characterize the evidence for readers, but instead frames it in this is “he said, she said” framework.
If we go back to climate change, there’s a really good evidence that giving people quote-unquote “balanced” portrayals of scientific or factual debates for the evidence isn’t balanced and can really mislead people. Somebody did an experiment where he varied whether a climate change coverage had a skeptic in it or not, and the inclusion of one skeptic completely changed how people thought of the evidence.
So just suggesting something might not be true is enough for people to think it’s not.
Well if you go by the sources quoted in the story it’s 50/50. There’s one climate scientist, there’s one skeptic, and if you read the story not very carefully you can come away thinking the scientific consensus isn’t very strong. So it’s not only a function of elites. They do play a key role, but they’re enabled by the weak negative incentives against misinforming people.
What’s another good example on the left that mirrors death panels then. What do left leaning people cling to that’s not supportable?
Well, it’s not the same as death panels but Obama saying you can keep your health care plan is sort of a dubious claim that people on the left seem to forgive him for. In some ways you could see it as the most prominent and misleading claim that was made on the Democratic side. It’s not as flatly false as the death panels claim, but it’s one he made a lot of times. And there’s others people associate with liberals. The public opinion data don’t show these as being more prominent among liberals at this point, but the elite action on them has been a little bit skewed left. Like vaccines and genetically modified foods are two areas that people often bring up where there are myths that circulate widely and they are often associated with a certain type of liberalism. Vermont just passed the first genetically modified food labeling requirement and that’s a very liberal state overall. And there are a lot of unsupported myths about the safety of vaccines and of genetically modified foods.
You mean as far as how dangerous they are?
Right. Basically there’s no data that supports that they are any more dangerous than anything else. Everything we eat has been genetically modified, depending on how you use the adjective. Humans have been breeding plants and animals for particular traits — which is a slow and inefficient way of genetically modifying food — for millennia. There’s a reason the turkeys we raise for food are so huge they can barely walk. But Moveon.org — which is a prominent liberal group — just sent out a fundraising email to raise money off the Vermont law, making Monsanto out as the boogey man.
But I’m scared of Monsanto. So even as you tell me there’s no safety issues, I still don’t buy it. In fact, I’m inclined to go look for research that says otherwise.
Right. Motivated reasoning.
I also saw a study where Democrats are changing opinion over how old is to old to be president. When Dole and McCain ran — or even Reagan — there were too old. But now studies say Hillary might not be.
Yes, Democrats consistently said every [Republican] candidate was too old — until it was their person. [laughs] My favorite on that was a political scientist who looked at the people who were concerned about age. And the people who were most concerned were old people because they knew what happens to them. And my mom who’s 67, she agreed to that.
So knowing this, how do people have a reasonable discussion? You talk about inoculating yourself against bias and boosting ego. What do these things do and what can we learn from this?
Well, that’s hard. We need institutions that facilitate more broad minded kinds of discussion. I don’t think that should be up to people themselves. We need settings where you can engage constructively. So basically the opposite of internet comment sections. [laughs] And people are trying to figure this out. People are trying to moderate comment sections — the New York Times does that. And I know a researcher named Talia Shroud at Texas, who’s been working with news companies on how to create more deliberative online interactive options. Like using a ‘respect’ button instead of ‘like’ button so people could say, “I don’t agree with that but I respect where you’re coming from” as kind of a civic-minded way of engaging. So there may be things you can do.
Is Facebook the worst thing ever for political debate? It seems like it lets people spew opinions and not listen to each other or take each other seriously. Has technology made it worse?
I don’t think we really know yet. People are investigating the extent to which there’s diversity in social media and the extent to which they interact across political divisions. I don’t know the full state of the research. But there’s a lot of heterogeneity in families — think of people arguing across the Thanksiving dinner table — and a lot of those people are your Facebook friends too. Or coworkers, right? And those can be politically diverse depending on the field you work in. But I wouldn’t say that trying to reverse political differences on Facebook is a conservative way of finding common ground. Most of the stuff I see tends to be cheerleading on one side on the other. But it’s hard. We’re often pretty well sorted by our politics as a result of where we live or our profession or our background. So the danger is being trapped in this mono-culture politically where you only talk to people with likeminded views. And there’s some evidence that deliberating with people who agree with you makes your views more extreme. So having heterogeneous groups is important. But that’s easier said than done.
What about your research that suggests boosting someone’s ego makes them more likely to accept a point of view. Is that sort of like the adage of giving people a compliment before offering a critique? Is it as simple as going, I respect your opinion but…”? Or is that all minor detail stuff compared to “My identity is my identity.”
It might help. My research involves people do themselves: so the extent you feel good about yourself buffers the threat you might otherwise feel when you’re told something you don’t want to hear. It’s hard for someone to do that for you. The reason it works is because you’re thinking about something that’s meaningful to you in some other area of your life and saying, “I’m a good person. I’m someone who tries to uphold their values’ so when someone says “Your side is wrong” about a controversial issue, you’re maybe willing to be more open-minded because you’re feeling better about yourself in this other area. That’s hard to replicate.
Is it at least safe to say that insulting people is not the best way to engage in debate? That calling someone a ‘republitard’ is not going to advance your veiwpont?
[laugh] Oh yeah. Yeah! But there’s all kinds of behaviors that can poison the well. Being respectful certainly helps make for more reasonable discussion.
So if everyone’s prone to digging their heels in and proving each other wrong, how do you get people to agree on this stuff?
I’m less worried about liberals and conservatives agreeing – they’re never gonna agree. What’s more important is agreeing on the underlying facts and having institutions that work when they disagree so sharply. But there’s no perfect solution to this. And there doesn’t need to be. I would say the reason we have politics is because we disagree. What we need are institutions that work when people disagree very sharply. Because polarized politics aren’t going away anytime soon. So the challenge is how do we govern our selves? And how do we have an actual debate about what we should do? How do agree on the terms of the debate?
My instinct in these debates is to say, “We shouldn’t put the burden on the individual to solve these problems; we should solve these problems collectively.” I we’re going to have a fact-based debate we need to create incentives for people to be accurate in public life. If we’re going to figure out how to govern ourselves when there’s polarization, we need to figure out how to make institutions work when the divide between liberals and conservatives — Democrats and Republicans – are so sharp. And those are problems that are beyond the scope of any individual, right? They’re really about us as a society. Could individuals do more? Yes. Should we expect them to? No! people have other things going on in their lives. And a lot of what w e see is a symptom of the way the political system is working as much as the cause. They’re taking their cues from the political system.
So we have one more reason to hate politicians. Just kidding.
[laughs] Yes. But the problem with this misinformation stuff is when I talk about it people think democracy is doomed. I don’t have quite as depressing a read on it. Because, again, we’ve had voters who aren’t so informed ever since democracy started — and we’re still here. And we’ve had polarization before. And this is a particularly ideological polarization. And that’s hard. And that’s the challenge we have: it’s that parties that aren’t just fighting really intensely with each other, but liberals and conservatives are matched really closely to whatever party they belong to. And that’s what makes it so challenging — both in terms of the facts and in terms of making government work. But the point I was saying about coastal communities and the extent to which there’s partisanship and common ground, I’d love to see you cover that. Because it’s at the leading edge of the climate debate. And there’s some indication that some places have fond more common ground for having those kinds of debates about mitigation than other places.
Because they’re more in the cross-hairs. So much like buying refrigerator, there’s a real consequence. Except this is much bigger than the refrigerator. It’s everything.
Right. I mean Downtown Miami could be underwater in forty years or whatever. So there are places where the stakes are so high, and in some cases the impacts are already being felt. I don’t know if that’s hit the Outer Banks yet. But I’d love to see if you cover it.
Well, I’m sure you saw North Carolina was the state that passed a law saying they weren’t going to consider sea level rise when making their laws. That was actually our coastal counties that led that change because of the potential economic damage on development and insurance hikes.
Wow. Oh the insurance thing! That’s right. That’s interesting because people are having that conversation of will insurance change the debate? Will the liabilities make it prohibitive to build in places that are at risk. But I hadn’t really thought about it on the consumer side.
Is that a classic case of people ignoring the facts? Or is it a little more nuanced? Because it seems like they almost readily admit they’re ignoring the facts for economic reasons.
You would know better than me. I hadn’t fully considered the economic and planning implications for people who live there, especially homeowners. So those unfortunately create perverse incentives to avoid long-term forecasting that call the viability of some of those residences into question.
Is NC-20 saying, “We’re not going to take this into consideration now” a case of elites dictating discussion? Or is that different?
I almost feel like I lack the local knowledge to speak to that one. The extent to which the local knowledge is mirroring national debate or deals with local dynamics and property values and insurance, I can’t say. But I will say it’s an interesting test case. We spoke earlier about how higher stakes might give people incentives to have more accurate beliefs and there’s a paper by a professor at Yale who talks about his work in Florida on climate change mitigation and the relative lack of polarization there on support for mitigation measures, which he sees as a hopeful sort of development. That there might be a possibility for a more fact-based dialogue in these local areas that are threatened. But it seems like the Outer Banks has not achieved the same level of consensus.
I wonder if that’s because in Miami there’s water backing up storm drains on extreme high tides. They’re feeling it firsthand, where here it’s less tangible — and therefore more debatable as to whether our issues are sea level rise or something else.
How salient sea level rise is in Miami on a day to day basis — or month to month or a season basis — is probably important. So the question is then, how do you move the discussion forward before it gets to that point in other places. Because when you get to that point, things are getting seriously wrong. And I don’t know the answer. We’re much better at diagnosing the problem than the solution, unfortunately. But what I would say is if you were looking at who to interview next, I would talk to someone in Holland. Because they’re threatened. And they’re having a very different conversation.
Are they being more proactive?
I’m no expert, but the European consensus around climate change seems to be stronger. They’re still having trouble moving forward on some of the more difficult mitigation and conservation methods that are harder to sell anywhere, but their consensus over scientific evidence seems to be broader. And I guess I wonder if there are lessons we can learn. And I’m no expert on the policy response and how to physically address the threat of rising sea levels. And all those aspects of the debate are going to play out in places like that too. It’s not like you guys are the only ones confronting these issues.
At least they agree there’s an issue to react to. Here it seem like both sides can find support for their views: see, it’s no real science. Or see, you guys need to act now.
Right. Well the way people’s property values and insurance are tied up makes it potentially very costly for them to admit they’re at risk. And again, the thing I would say is this such an important issue. And you’re having a debate that a lot of other people are going to be having in the future. So its important to learn from what’s happening and share it more broadly. That’s why the Washington Post is covering what’s happening.
Because we’re really small community. It’s not like we’re not a teeming metropolis.
And the fact you’re in North Carolina, which is a politically competitive state. It has a conservative element and these newer, more liberal migrants. I’m not going to say it’s a microcosm of the United States, but I has a lot of the elements that are at play nationally.
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
GIVE IT TO US STRAIGHT, DOC…
A check-up with Dr. Stephen P. Leatherman on what makes for a healthy beach
Just who is Stephen P. Leatherman? And why should any of us care? Well, you probably know him better as “Dr. Beach.” Every Memorial Day weekend he issues a top-10 list of “America’s Best Beaches,” inspiring huge headlines for coastal newspapers across the country and endless slideshows for click-hungry travel websites. (Not to mention drawing biting cries of malpractice by destinations that don’t make the cut.)
What you may not realize is Leatherman isn’t some quack paid to write press release fodder for tourist boards — he’s a respected scientist and professor at Miami’s Florida International University who’s spent 20 years developing and revising a format of 50 criteria from access to water quality. And what you most surely didn’t know is he began his illustrious career right here on the Outer Banks, doing research for his alma mater, North Carolina State University.
“I spent my last two years as an undergrad studying erosion,” says the 67-year-old Charlotte native. “Every weekend I’d drive down to do beach profiles and track currents in Cape Hatteras and Ocracoke. That’s how I paid my way through college. I see the Outer Banks as almost a second home.”
Maybe that’s why both beaches consistently make the top 10. (Ocracoke even hit #1 in 2007; Cape Hatteras’ highest ranking was #4 in 2010.) But just because we’re among his favorite patients doesn’t mean we get special treatment. Each year, Leatherman dives back into his research to perform a veritable colonoscopy on every inch of U.S. shoreline, meaning beaches rise and fall every summer. Some even drop off the charts entirely. We called the doctor to find out what makes for a healthy beach and how to stay on his list for years to come. What follows is the full-transcript of that one-hour interview. — Matt Walker
MILEPOST: What’s the best way to credit you?
DR. STEPHEN P. LEATHERMAN: Well, everyone knows me as Dr. Beach. It would be good to credit my website — www.drbeach.org — because it has a lot of information on it. But I’m a professor in coastal sciences at Florida International University in Miami
I found that interesting because, despite all the publicity, people wouldn’t automatically know how much of a coastal science background you have.
Right. A lot of people know me as just Dr. Beach. They don’t know there’s a Dr. Leatherman who does scientific research. And I really started off looking at beaches. In fact, I grew up in Charlotte, North Carolina and I went to NC State University as an undergraduate. There was a project at the time and they wanted people to go out in wintertime and survey the beaches on the Outer Banks on North Carolina. Because there’s always been questions about erosion. And that’s really how I got into all of this. I spent my last two years as an undergrad studying beach erosion. A lot of people didn’t want to go. They said, “Oh no, I don’t want to go to beach in the winter. It’s cold in the winter.” But I was paying my way through school, so it worked out perfect for me. And every weekend I would bring another person with me and we’d drive out and survey the beach profiles and use fluorescein dye to check for longshore currents and try to estimate the size of the waves. I did that my final two years at NC State. I paid my way through.
Have you been back since then? Do you know how much it’s changed?
Last time I was in Cape Hatteras was probably three years ago, but the changes are incredible. Whalebone Junction was just two roads that came together. There was nothing there. All just nice little cottages. I kind of wish it was that way now, to be honest with you, that they hadn’t brought in all the commercialization. But I do understand people need a certain amount of convenience.
But it is sort of a double-edged sword how this tuff works; you build up these tourism industries, but how do you preserve the atmosphere people come for?
It is. I think one good thing is it hasn’t gone high-rise — like Miami or some of these other areas.
Not yet. So how do the criteria affect each other? I’d assume the more access you have, the more potential for water quality problems — or even just crowds.
Ironic, isn’t it? But you’re quite right. If there’s not good access, then I can’t give a beach a good rating. And bad access could mean not enough parking. There’s some beaches where you get to and drive with the kids and everyone in the car and it says “park closed” on your favorite weekend or wherever you want to go. And there’s a place here in Florida where you only get there by ferryboat and it’s fairly expensive. And to me a $60 ride on a ferryboat is not good access. So I have to count a lot of points off for that. And people there say, “Well, you know, it keeps out the riff-raff.” and I say, “I’m sure it does [laughs], but I can’t see paying $60 on average per person to go across to the beach.”
And you developed this criteria over the past 20 years, correct?
Well, it didn’t take that long. But over a period of time. But it took quite awhile to do it, but nobody had done it before. And I thought that was interesting. People had rated rivers but not beaches. I don’t know why that is. But it took a while to think about that, and the ratings are scientific but they’re also meant for people’s use of that area. It’s not just grain size or mineralogy just for its own sake; I try to think about how people would enjoy it. So, very fine sand, people prefer that. And of course, pink sand, but there’s not many pink sand beaches. But black sand beaches are very exotic in Hawaii, but they really are very hot. [laughs] But for the 25th year — next year — I’m going to pump up another criteria and that’s smoking on beaches. I’m going to try to get smoking off beaches. Because the number one form of litter is cigarette butts. The number one problem is plastic. But cigarette butts are awful. And people put them out and think they disappear, but next thing they’re up on the surface. Kids are eating them. Ugh! Give ma break. There’s nothing I hate more than putting my hand down in a pile of cigarette butts.
I would assume water quality would make all the difference because that’s where people spend their time in the water. Is it weighted in some ways?
For water quality, I look at EPA data. I couldn’t possibly test all the beaches myself. But fortunately, all the counties have their own health departments to take water samples. And all that is put together by the EPA. And the NRDC also has it. So you can go to either website and find it. But I look at all the water quality data. And if they’ve had more than a couple of beach closures a year, then they’re out — that’s for sure.
So there’s a tier system of sorts. If they don’t pass a couple of primary levels, they’re out.
Exactly. If they’ve got water quality problems, they’re out. Flat out. And the reason I say one or two, because a sea gull can poop in the water and if you take a water sample, you’ll get a high bacteria count, even though it wouldn’t be harmful to you. So you have to allow for one bad test show a year. But if it shows up again, they’re out.
It’s funny you say that. Because we don’t have bad water quality, per se. But if it rains, it can get bad at certain spots because of run-off. And I lived out for Southern California and if it rained there you didn’t surf for 72 hours. But there was this complacency about it. But here, we have outfalls that connect to these drainage systems. And occasionally, if they test, the numbers aren’t pretty.
And that is a real problem. I get a lot of criticism from people in California who say, “Why don’t we have more top 10 beaches? Is it because we don’t have enough mosquitoes? Or we don’t have enough hurricanes?” And I get that a lot from the LA Times and the San Diego Union Tribune. They get really mad at me. They say, “You know we have the best beaches in the country. The Beach Boys songs tell you that.” Yeah, for surfing. But the problem with Southern California is there’s so much development. And you may have great beauty with all the sea cliffs, but it’s where the mountain meets the sea, so you also get run-off problems. And it’s very hard for them because when it rains in winter, it runs off so quickly — how do you stop all that? And in San Francisco they tried for a while, and it overflowed their sewer systems, which is even worse. And I know in your area and also in Myrtle Beach and other places when get those thunderstorms and a lot of water, it’s very hard to deal with. And you don’t want to shunt it back toward the bay, because then you foul up all the water for the clamming and oysters and all that.
Well, when they do the DENR testing here, there’s a sound beach that’s consistently worst in the state. And that’s because the water’s stagnant, and hot and we only have one inlet. I know the sound in the summer is great to kayak in but I wouldn’t want to go swimming in it. And it all comes down to the number of people; the more people in a spot or resource, the more you’ll foul it up.
Sure. That’s right. And then you had that huge disaster a while ago, Floyd, when all those pig pits overflowed and went into the Pamlico Sound. That was unbelievable.
So how does these criteria play off each other? It’s water, sand, rip currents.
Well, here’s the way you look at it: number one it’s clean sand, clean water. If you don’t have that you’re out. And obviously, number one is clean water, but I also look very carefully at the sand. Both sand quality and in terms of is there litter? Is there glass in the sand? But the way it gets weighted is there’s 50 criteria, and if you look at it there’s a number of issues about the sand — so if there’s a problem with the sand quality, you’ll get knocked down real low. Same thing with safety. Beach safety is a very big issue. If you look at the criteria, I talk about rip currents, I talk about the presence of lifeguards — two or three other things — where it’s all about beach safety. You don’t have those things and you have problems with drownings, you’re going to go down very fast. Beach safety is a big issue. Beach access is a big issue. And that’s how it’s weighted, because there’s a number of factors in those areas. There’s not just one factor that captures those aspects.
It’s funny you say that, because they’re all factors we’re coming to grips with. We just had a big nourishment project but they actually did a good job with matching the sand…
Oh good.
And they’re about to do that for the whole county. How will that impact years to come?
Let me talk about that. How did Dare County get the money?
We fund it ourselves. We have a county fund beach protection measures. And we just put an extra penny of tax on our occupancy to help fund it. Nags Head just did it and three years later all the towns have teamed up to do it from Duck to Nags Head.
Well, here’s the thing. In some ways I’m going to applaud you for not going to the Corps — not that you could get the funding, because you don’t have enough high-rises or what they would call ‘economic value.’ And that’s the terrible thing, is you sort of have to be the bad kid to get the Corps money. And to me that’s wrong. It’s also very political, because even if you have a lot of development and come up to their benefit-cost ratio, there’s a huge amount of politics. There’s lobbyists who make six-figure salaries talking through the senators and congressmen to see who get the money. And there’s some good people in the Corps of Engineers. I have colleagues there, but by and large, it’s an agency that’s a mostly political animal. But that’s not your Field Research Facility; that’s research. And that’s a great thing. That’s the most studied beach in the world. But Wilmington has one of these Corps district offices and by and large, those offices aren’t base level funded. If you look at most federal programs, the money’s going to come in no matter what they do — I hate to say that, but that’s kind of how it is. But the Corps, they shrink up if they don’t get projects. So they’re forced to go after projects. In the old days, that meant building dams. Well, as someone says, “They dammed every river they could.” Now in the last 30 years, it’s all pretty much been — well, they do some inlet work, they get money there — but a lot of it’s beach nourishment because that’ where the money is. And they’ve become political animals trying to get that money. Here on the Panhandle of Florida there was a town that didn’t want beach nourishment but they got it anyway. Because the Corps wanted to keep money rolling.
It’s funny you say that, because we have a lot of issues with Oregon Inlet here. And the Corps is responsible for dredging. And some people want to put a terminal groin on the north side, but even the Corps said that wouldn’t stop them from having to dredge, which to me said a lot: because if the Corps says ‘no’ to a job, it must not be a good idea.
Well, that’s going to be a big black eye if they do that. Because we know it’s not going to work that well. Because that’s a huge inlet. Probably the most treacherous inlet on the whole east coast. I’d hate to be a fisherman going in and out of there in winter. But it’s one of those inlets that’s very hard to hold. But that’s a tough one, for sure.
So with nourishment here, seeing as it’s self-funded, is it a good thing?
Well, I know people like Orrin Pilkey, who’s a retired professor at Duke, have campaigned against beach nourishment for most of their life. And I understand where he’s coming from in the sense that the public seems to think that beach nourishment is an end-all. That it’s a permanent solution. And it’s not. You have to realize that putting sand on a beach treats the symptoms; it does not cure the disease. The symptom is beach erosion, but the disease is rising sea level, coastal storms and some other factors. So the thing is, there’s going to be a lifetime of that nourishment project. In other words: it’s not going to last forever. So you have to think of it that way. And that’s not the way the public thinks. And also people have come to think that beach nourishment equals coastal management. That all you have to do is keep pumping sand on shore and they don’t have to worry, they can develop as much as they want to. In fact, in Ocean City Maryland, people started developing closer to the water after all of these projects. You see what I mean? So let’s go back to your situation: assuming that the project’s done well, assuming that you’ve got material that’s of similar size, then I credit beaches with the nourishment. Because I look at beach width: if there’s no beach at high tide, then I have to take off points for that.
As long as the sand quality’s good and they’re not dumping fill dirt.
That’s right. I used to work down at the Duke University Marine Lab, I taught there for about five summers —I guess back in the 90s, I can’t remember now — but it was a course called Barrier Island Ecology. I really enjoyed being there. Beautiful area. And the inlet which comes into Beaufort — Beaufort Inlet in Morehead City — the Corps periodically has to dredge that out, so they looked at Atlantic Beach on the north end of the island and said, “You want some free sand?” And they said, “Sure! Free sand!” Well, it wasn’t just sand; they also got a bunch of clay. And they kept pumping that out on the beach. And for years the water, which used to be very clear — in fact, other parts of the area were called Emerald Isle — these mudballs would be moved by the surf and be caught up in suspension. And the water was all turbid. It was awful. I’m not saying it was polluted; but it was awful.
So there’s ways to do it right, and ways to do it wrong. And you have to keep your eye on the ball. And the end goal is to achieve a place that people want to enjoy.
But that wasn’t strictly a beach nourishment project, it was a disposal project, and they got away with it. But I’m not against beach nourishment. I do ask the question, who profits and who pays? For instance the south side of Long Island is getting 100% of their beach nourishment paid for because they’ve got all this money left over from Superstorm Sandy. And I went up to Montauk, and the Corps came in and said, “We have $100 million to blow. We’re gonna give you beach nourishment and we’re going to build you a seawall.” And the concerned citizens of Montauk called me up and I said, “Let’s do the beach nourishment, but let’s get rid of the seawall.”
I think there’s a lack of awareness as to how coastal processes work. People want groins because hard structures seem permanent, but they actually do more harm.
That’s right: groins rob Peter to pay Paul. You put a groin in front of your property, your beach gets very wide, very quick. But you look at your neighbor’s and it’s shrinking. So groins don’t create any new sand, they just redistribute it along the beach profile. And that’s the problem there. And they say, why don’t we do the whole beach? And it will hold the beach. But you still can lose sand offshore, and over time you’ll lose the sand and have to do nourishment anyway. And the other thing is, aesthetically, I don’t find them very pleasing. And they’re also a hazard for swimmers.
That’s the other issue we’re facing. As you know, Cape Hatteras has a lot of park land. Part of their federal budget cuts included eliminating lifeguards at the three remaining beaches. Is that an automatic ding?.
I’m sorry to hear that. Got rid of all the lifeguards? You mean Lifeguard Beach on Ocracoke is no longer a lifeguarded beach?
That’s right. The situation’s still fluid. They’re trying to find the funding. But right now they’re saying lifeguards on federal property. Now, the towns still have them – including Rodanthe and Buxton on Hatteras – but not on Ocracoke.
Oh no! Well, that’s going to be a downgrade, there. I’m sorry to hear that. Can they put the lifeguards back?
People are trying. There’s been some outcry and stuff, and petitions. But who knows how the government will react? It’s all part of lots of changes in the whole park system here in response to budget cuts.
Well, you know, I can go into a whole other issue about this too. I was looking at a park down here in Florida with the park service people, not too far from Cape Canaveral. And I looked, and I said, “This is a national park?” And they said, some local congressman slipped it in. And they spend this huge amount of money on this place, which — as far as I can see — has no real significance other than that someone knew someone. And they’re spending millions of dollars fixing it up. And so we have a lot of national parks that shouldn’t ever be parks. Therefore they’re draining money from the real gems like Hatteras and Yellowstone to subsidize and pay for what should be state or county parks. But that’s a whole ‘nother issue.
Well, the park service is a lighting rod here. People aren’t happy with the issues with pedestrian and ORV access and protected species and so forth. But it’s kind of a Catch -22, because at the same point, if it wasn’t’ for the park service, the beach would all be condos.
That’s right. And I know exactly what you’re talking about because sometimes they clamp down too much. It’s always been a challenge of the National Park Service to make available the resources and also protect it. And sometimes they go too far on the protection because it’s the easy thing to do. But you know, the Outer Banks is a special place and that’s the reason it became the first National Seashore. And if you look at satellite imagery from around the world — and I have — you don’t see anything quite like these three big capes. So it’s completely unique in the world. And it also has such a great history of shipwrecks and the things people did.
So how does that work? When you gauge those issue, is a pristine beach you can’t get to, how does that work?
Well, I start taking points off for that, too. Because at the end of the day, if you don’t have access , you don’t have anything. And the other thing, I like the Outer Banks because you do have towns, so you do have some — shall we say — creature comforts nearby. Now I can take you to a beach in Olympic national park, Shi-Shi beach. There’s a 10-mile walk in and you have to take everything with you. And you’ll see a lot wildlife and wood on the beach — in fact, you’ll see logs that are five feet in diameter — but the point is, I don’t put that on my top 10 list, because this area is so isolated and there are no amenities. And how many people are going to want to walk in 10 miles to a beach? Yeah, there’s some real hardy people out there. and I enjoyed it one time. But I’m not going to go out to that beach very often. So if you want to make the list, you do have some creature comforts. But you also let nature be nature. Down her in South Florida — South Beach? I go down there every now and again. But it’s a party beach. It’s all a bunch of nightclubs emptying onto thee beach. And the beach is big. It’s nice. It’s warm. But I can’t make it a top beach because it’s overcrowded. You go onto the beach you can’t find your kid. It’s like Where’s Waldo?. So if there’s too many people it’s not going to be a top beach. And then people come out of the bars and pee in the streets. [laughs ] But the bathrooms are just awful. It’s hard to keep them in good shape in Loomis Park because when they did the $60 million nourishment project, they had to set the beach up as a public park. But the bathrooms are just awful because the homeless use them to live out of.
Well, one of the questions about beach nourishment here is what to do in Duck because there is no real access. And of course, it’s public money. And even up in Corolla, there’s not much access. So how do those rate?
I don’t rate those beaches because I don’t think they’re truly open to the public.
Well, to the county’s credit, when they started talking about funding Duck they said access will have to improve. But you mentioned the high rises earlier and the amount of economic value. There was a point here where Kill Devil Hills discussed raising the height limit to allow for taller buildings. And I do think part of it wasn’t so much about putting bodies on the beach but getting that nourishment funding. Is that an old trick?
It’s an old ploy, that’s exactly right .You have to have infrastructure at risk to get the federal money. So you have to go up. If you just have regular housing, it’s not enough money. Because if you look at beach nourishment, it’s usually $3 or $4 million per mile to do it, depending on how wide you build the beach. So you‘ve got to get the value up to generate the return or cost-benefit ratio. And I think initially a Corps project is a subsidy for the people who get it. But at the end of the day, the area puts in a lot more money than they realize. And you have to wait years to get things going. And it becomes political based on what lobbyist works the scene the best. The point of it is: I don’t think the Corps should be in the business. But I’m not against beach nourishment. If we didn’t have beach nourishment here in South Florida we wouldn’t have any beaches. And the reason for it is we’ve got beach erosion and people built clear to the shore. So we created the problem. But if we didn’t have the beaches, people wouldn’t come to South Florida. They’d go to the Caribbean or somewhere else. South Florida wouldn’t be a hot beach anymore. It would be sea walls and water and no beaches. It wouldn’t be what it is to day, that’s for sure.
Are there any high-rise towns one your beach? There are some pretty obvious gaps — VB , Myrtle Beach…
No, there’s no high rise beaches. I know people in Baltimore who go to Ocean City and they say, “We live in high rises here and we want to go to a high rise in Ocean City. We don’t like those little flat buildings; we want a great view. And I kind of understand that. But high rises really take a way from the whole felling of an area. They dominate the landscape. And in the afternoon, they’re blocking the sun — and that’s the best sun of the day! At least on the east coast. And aesthetically, they dominate the landscape and to me that’s not nature. It’s not like Diamondhead in Waikiki where you have this big volcano in the background. That’s fantastic; that’s all part of nature.
There’s a lot of people in those things, too. And that’ the irony – and I don’t’ know if you feel any guilt about this — but towns use these ratings to get more bodies.
Well, I tell people this. If you have the luxury to travel when you want to, go in the off season. Go to the Outer Banks after Labor Day. The water’s still warm. And it stays warm ‘til October or something. You don’t have the numbers so much. And the fishing starts coming in the fall, too. But if you can choose you season, you can avoid crowds. I lived on Cape Cod for a number of years and I don’t’ go in July and August because overrun with people. There’s’ traffic jams and you can’t go anywhere.
That’s why I figure winter is our saving grace. Because if it was nice here year round, we’d be in a world of hurt.
In terms of population? I think you would be. But you know, I like the beaches there in winter. Certainly, you have to put on your coat, and the wind can really whip through you sometimes. But the beach looks so different and I like to see the big waves crashing through there, particularly at the point where they refract around and hit each other on that spit that goes out in the water. It’s just a different place altogether. I don’t know. You get away from everybody. You can walk the beach and not see a soul. Just the whistling of the wind all around you. I became a person who loves the beaches in the wintertime. And people couldn’t understand that at all, but it’s totally different. Of course, you can’t go swimming obviously — and I love to go swimming. But I like the solitude. I like the serenity of it all.
That’s funny you say that, because a lot of people who live here say the same thing. It’s sort of a litmus test for survival. So you might make the cut if you ever wanted to live here.
You mean I might be acceptable? [laughs]
That’s another interesting thing looking at your annual list: there are a lot of national seashores and state parks —Hawaii, Florida, Cape Cod, here. Why is that?
Well, the reason I put them on there is for their great scenic beauty. Their water quality is high usually because there’s no overdevelopment. And they usually keep up the resource well. And they usually have pretty good access. And they don’t have huge crowds normally either. There’s no big high rises on the beach; it’s more scattered in terms of where people are. It’s not throngs of people where you can’t walk past the blankets to get to the water.
It seems like they make good anchors, too. Even here in Nags Head and Kill Devil Hills, we have Hatteras nearby.
It’s a great asset. A great asset. I like your combination because you’ve got the villages and people can have all that. And if you want to get away more, you drive south a short ride and see just pure nature. So I like your combination — I think that’s one of the best combinations — because, again, you’ve got the facilities, you’ve got places to stay. You don’t have to camp out — but you’ve got campgrounds if you want to do all that. So I like that balance. It’s one of the reasons I really love the Outer Banks, in addition to all the other things.
I was surprised to see South Hampton, Long Island on the list. My vision of that is exclusive homes with P. Diddy Martha Stewart with little access
Well, let me tell you about Southampton. The Hamptons are very exclusive. It’s one of what I call the “three gold beaches” in the U.S. The others are Palm Beach and Malibu. So these are havens for the rich and famous, there’s no doubt about that. But if you drive out on the Sunrise Highway — Route 27 or whatever –you go through an area where its stunted pine forest and there’s no development for miles and miles and miles. And then you get into West Hampton Beach, South Hampton Beach, and all that, and finally East Hampton and then Montauk. So you have a long stretch there where — yes, you have the rich and famous — but in many ways, they’ve maintained the big sand dunes. They have not built on the beaches. And there’s no high rises. And the houses they build are very interesting. Some look like castles. every one of them is an architectural wonder. You have 25- to 30-foot dunes there. You have beaches that are 300 feet wide. There’s no pollution. No factories. The beaches are almost pristine in that regard. Except for behind the sand dunes, you’ve got huge houses sitting on sometimes 10 acres of land. But they do have public access. So you go to Coopers Beach in South Hampton , which was number one beach a few years ago, there’s a parking lot behind the big sand dune that will hold probably 200 to 300 cars. But you have to pay to get in there. And it’s very high, like 30 dollars. But what I tell people to do is go to South Hampton and bring a bicycle. It’s like this little New England town with a proper square and a little historic district and wide streets. So you ride everywhere on bikes. You don’t need to drive your car and pay. Because I’m not going to pay $30 a day to park.
Here we have an access in every block in some place. And the parking’s free. And sometimes people recommend charging as a revenue stream, but I’m happy to say the towns seem to feel that’s short-sighted.
Or New Jersey you have to have a beach badge. And that to me is ridiculous.
I assume that’s why you don’t see New Jersey beaches on the list either.
That’s one reason. They also have a lot of pollution problems. And it’s over crowded. People pour in from Philadelphia, New York — and New Jersey has a big population in its own right. And they charge you 10 to 15 bucks to get a beach badge. That’s public beach! How can you charge me?
I’ve always said, I’ve never been to New Jersey beaches and see a NC tag. I think there’s a reason people drive past so many options to come here. That says something.
It does. When I lived in the DC area, I was a professor at the University of Maryland for 16 years, and we always went to Duck. And the reason was it was the closest high quality beach. And a bunch of us would come down and get a five-bed room house. And it was up high so you could see the water. And it’s a beautiful area. The whole area. I used to go windsurfing in the sound. And at night we’d drink good wine. My kids would go out and chase ghost crabs. They thought was so much fun. So that was one of the criteria for a good beach when they were 8 or 9 years old. We don’t have those down here.
So maybe the lesson is to play your strengths. I think when people see these lists they have the tendency to homogenize and pick up other beaches’ attributes. But you have to play your strengths. we may have rip tides, but that’s price of natural sloping beach. Or an issue with access down south is part of the price of a national park.
It is a balance. And it is a tradeoff.
Have any beaches ever fallen off of the list? For what reason?
Oh yes. I had a beach, Poipu Beach in Kauai. A fantastic beach on the dry side of Kauai. An idyllic place. It got hit by a hurricane that kind of wiped out the area for five or six years. And I had to drop it off the list. But finally the beach did come back naturally and they rebuilt some facilities and it later became a national winner. But it didn’t come back for along time. And of course, if an oil spill hits — I had to pull some beaches off the Gulf of Mexico on the Florida Panhandle. And they were off for a year or so. Fortunately, a lot of the oil never made landfall. Although the tarballs are bad. And just the threat of them are bad.
The dispersants are what I got worried about.
Well, that was unnecessary and stupid in its own right.
Well, that’s another issue because our Governor wants to drill offshore, which seems foolish when you consider what our tourism economy brings in. Should we be worried?
I can’t imagine you have the oil they have in the Gulf of Mexico. The geology’s not the same. But I don’t even think oil drilling would be economically viable off there. And I know where the governor’s coming form. Everyone’s trying to get more economic activity and more jobs, but you guys are better off than most areas because you’ve got the tourism. And it’s so much more expensive offshore. And when you look at the potential for oil and potential cost environmentally, at least for thee foreseeable future, I don’t see it. But if you start having problems with oil spills, or those other things, it’s certainly gonna sink you.
So, looking out long-term, how do think we fare? Are we pretty high upon the list? Do we have a shot at the title?
Well, I’d like for you to work on those lifeguards. Because this is very upsetting to me. Maybe the county can come up with some money for just one area designated for the lifeguards. Because a lot of people, particularly the visitors, can come in who have no idea bout the water. They can drown almost in their bathtub. Much less worry about currents, and big waves and that kind of thing. So I hope you can get the lifeguards back. But I love that area. It’s like a second home in many ways. You’ve got Jockey’s Ridge. How many people have that? It showed up on early maps. That’s not something recent. All the early explorer charts show Jockey’s Ridge. I’ve always wanted to try hang gliding there because it seems like a safe place to try. But just climbing up is an experience. When my kids were small, we climbed up Jockeys Ridge and they’re tired and screaming like, “This is like the Sahara Desert!’ And I’m like, “I know. Isn’t it wonderful?”
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CONSIDER THE SOURCE
In an age when politicians and activists increasingly twist environmental debate, one anthropologist asked people for their honest opinions.
Are you a Lorax — or an Onceler? Are you the bunny-hugging, pro-regulation eco-terrorist who “speaks for the trees?” Or the soulless pro-developer willing to pave over plovers and parks to make every penny? Quick, pick a side. Because when it comes to environmental debate in Dare County, there are only two teams: those who will protect nature no matter who it hurts economically; and those who will fuel the economy now matter how much nature it kills.
Or so the various politicians and activist groups would have you believe.
“The message war is the biggest war of all,” says East Carolina University Anthropology professor Dr. Christine Avenarius. “So we have all these special interests who try to put discussion into a particular framework and stimulate people along a particular thought path.”
Last summer, Avenarius decided to bypass those paths. For six months she and six grad students talked to 208 Dare County residents. No SELCs. No NC-20s. And no direct questions. Instead of “How much do you hate catch limits?” or “Which McMansion would you burn to the ground?” — they asked things like, “Do you see changes?” and “Where would you put tax dollars?”
What’d she find out? A whole lot. Mainly that residents are quite aware how economics and the environment affect each other — especially when it impacts them firsthand — leading to more varied and nuanced perspectives than you might believe.
“A lot of people do have middle-of-the-road opinions,” she notes. “And very few realize how many others share the same opinion as themselves.”
We sat down with the good doctor to hear more about what we think, why we think it and what it means for Dare County in the future. What follows is the full unedited transcript from the interview printed in issue 3.1. — Matt Walker
MILEPOST: Thanks for taking the time to talk. I know it’s early in the analyzing process, but I’m sure there’s enough info to give some perspective as to what you were trying to do with the project.
DR. CHRISTINE AVENARIUS: The whole idea was to give people a voice to hear what they’re thinking. And, also, by talking about it, to come to some realization and awareness. That was the original goal. And if you look at the demographics, we’ve got 208 people who went through the questioning process. We’ve got slightly more men than women. It’s not as equally distributed as I designed or wished for, so I might at some point start leaving people out and see if I have an equal distribution on how those opinions change. But what came out is a pretty interesting proportional representation of what’s going on and who really wants to be heard. So, in some ways, we don’t have as many Hatteras people as in other areas, there are fewer year-round Hatteras people over all. So if you look at this, KDH has the biggest population and we have the biggest proportion there. So 35% of the people come from KDH north, then Nags Head, then Hatteras and Manteo.
But even so, if there’s 35,000 year round residents, and 5,000 people south of the bridge. That’s one-seventh. You didn’t just set up at a single beach access and talk to people as they walked over the dune.
Right. It’s not completely exact. But it’s not completely off. And I’ve teased it down into more detail. So if you look at the number of people who are born and raised in Dare and spent 100% of their lifetime here, it’s around 27%. And the biggest proportion is people who’ve spent between one quarter to a half of their lifetime here. They’re mostly represented. And many fall into the age group of 40 to 60. And I’ve played with age in different ways, but here we have youngest to 35, and the middle-aged people and then the over 50. And then I also did under 30, 30 to 39. But, the bulk of people come from this 40 to 60 group.
But that’s when the bulk of people moved here.
And Dare County is an interesting place because it was so empty in the 80s and then all these people came in, almost gold rush style, moving in and building up businesses. And those are people who came from the outside, often at the age of 25 to 28 — I have a lot of those biographical stories — and now they’re in their 50s. And it’s still traditional gender roles, where the guy does most of the business and the wife does the background either helping with the books or helping with the kids. And that’s still the dominant Dare County model right now. It’s on the out, but it’s there. And interestingly, over 60 — and this is typical of American demographics — I’ve got more women than men. So for more active women over 60, 65 — League of Women Voters and that kind of thing — there were a lot of people who came forward from all areas and were willing to talk. So what happens with this type of sampling, when you do it as long as we did it, you come up with an organic representation.
And then I was struggling with socioeconomics, so I had true business owners — people actively running a business, not retired ones — and that’s 25% of the people we interviewed. Most of them are 40 to 60. Freelancers, about 9% to10%. And most of them are younger, under 45. Then you’ve got a big group of people who are employed. And then there are retired folks.
When I see those numbers, I see retirees as “no dog in the fight anymore; just cruising.” The middle guys are holding on to what they’ve got. And the younger guys are coming up and trying to get what’s theirs. The new growth.
And this is going to be a huge, huge topic for Dare County. How is leadership going to change? How are the demographics going to change? But it is an interesting social laboratory here in Dare County because you had this rather scarcely populated area. Then, you’ve got all these people coming in following the traditional business and gender roles. They’re all about to retire. So in the next 10 years, we’ll see a lot of people segueing out. And then the next generation and younger is not so interested in business or running a restaurant.
I see two things going on. I’m not so sure the people who moved here in the 80s were looking for a gold rush so much as they were more engaged in the lifestyle. And they figured out how to make that happen. I would argue that we’re seeing more of a gold rush now, where certain banks and developers smell money and are coming strictly for that reason. Their motivation is to make money.
Some people had quotes that said, “If I see another bank I’m going to vomit.”
Well, it’s true. There was a time when it wasn’t so clear whether a business would make money. We now have a population that’s large enough it can support business whether it’s necessary or not. So the Outer Banks went from a situation of “How can I make it there?” to “How can I make a buck there?”
And then some of the people in this older group maybe came in to surf or fish, and carved out a niche. And as that solidified, they shifted as their lifestyle position changed. So they got more conservative.
Okay, so let’s pull back before we go any further: What’s your title?
I’m an Associate Professor of Anthropology at ECU.
And you live in Greenville but you stayed here for six months?
Yes, I rented a house for six months. I had grant money that paid for a house and funded gas money and a little for the students’ living expenses, so they could help me.
So no tax dollars.
No, the Z Smith Reynolds foundation funded this. The idea was to restart the dialogue on coastal management procedures. And in order to restart the dialogue, with all those different factions, you needed to hear from a large cross-section of the population about what they see in terms of environmental changes and what they see in terms of economic issues. And part of the grant money will now be used to gain insights as to what they all said. And this next summer I’ll do the inner banks around the Albemarle. But the grant money paid no salary for me, but for accommodations, gas money and for student stipends.
When I think of environmental debate in Dare County, it’s you’re either a Lorax or a Onceler. There’s no middle ground. It’s either, save everything or kill everything. And in many ways that’s because debate over these issues is being shanghaied by interest groups. So on one side you’ve got Audubon and SELC pushing their agenda and on the other side it’s NC-20 or the Chamber of Commerce. And the idea you can have an issue-by-issue stance has been lost.
So what I was trying to do is give people a voice — and give people from a large range of demographics a voice — and not go to the groups. And of course, there are some Dare County celebrities — for lack for lack of a better term — who are part of the group because people would say “ you have to interview this person.” So people would put a front man on the issue. But a lot of times I would decline, because I was looking for people who aren’t running for office or aren’t invested in certain issues.
Well, that’s how the media works. And you end up going to those people when you’re looking to cover an issue because they’re the spokespeople. And it narrows the debate, because the only people talking are the people who have something major to gain or it’s part of their job to put the word out. But those are the only people you hear because the press can’t talk to everyone.
So we’re trying to cut through that, without giving them a platform.
Who funds the company who funds the grant?
Z Smith Reynolds? It’s originally tobacco family money out of Winston-Salem.
So it’s not like Audubon is funding it.
No. And it was unusual for Z Smith Reynolds to fund me, because they normally fund actual community efforts where someone says, “I want to establish an afterschool program for kids.” But they were intrigued because opinions were flaring up in regard to the policy of NC-20 to ignore sea level rise recommendations. And I said, “give me money to collect more voices.” And they thought that was interesting so they did. But, truth be told, it was $32,000 for one year. Once you rent a house and give stipends to six students, that money’s gone. It’s not riches.
Well, it’s just a matter of figuring out who funded what. It’s not like the SELC said to go out there.
No, the mission was to stimulate dialogue and get people together. And that’s what interested the grant people.
And the other part was to get people to think about why they think a certain way, as opposed to just parroting a certain viewpoint.
What everybody else says. And another thing was we wanted to look at was the mistrust of scientists. There’s been an increase among the general population of people who question the objectivity of science — or they’re not interested in the objectivity of science — and many of them are more interested in what they believe, or what they think is right, or what they think is common sense. And they have the feeling that they have been let down by these scientists and their discussions. And so I wanted to go out and ask them, “What do you actually see? Do you see change in the environment? Or are these scientists crazy? This is your chance to say something.”
So you wanted to get past the “official stance” and into the individual perspectives. How did the process work? You didn’t want to direct the conversation by asking direct questions. So what did you do?
These long sit-down interviews had several parts. One was to collect observations about environment and how things have changed. So those were open-ended questions where we asked people, “What are your favorite places?” And “What are your least favorite places or eyesores?” And from there, we’d say, “What on the beach have you seen changing? How do you know it’s changing?” Same with the soundside: “What’s changing and how do you know?” And those were the basic questions we asked. And we’re hoping they’d mention climate change or sea level rise, but at the most you’ve got 20% of people mentioning that at all. But everybody — almost 90% if not more — can describe a few different areas in Dare County that they’ve seen changes over the years. And they describe it as “erosion.” So one of the take home messages I’d turn over to our dear scientists is that people really don’t see evidence for sea level rise. And some would say as much, “How do I see sea level rise? I don’t see it. The waves come and go but I don’t see it.” But they do see erosion. They see beach disappearing and sand accumulating.
So they are aware.
Very aware. They see change. They say, “Of course it’s changing.” And most everybody can describe what’s going on. And they have very interesting descriptions, like ‘Mother Nature takes.” Or, “The beach is always going to be there, it just won’t be where it is today.” Or, ‘Watching the coastline change is like a mother who might not notice her child grow. She might not notice from day to day, but over time a great deal of change takes place.” Or, “Oregon Inlet is like taking a wild child and making him sit still in a seat.” [laughs] I love that one. But a lot of people who live in Dare County say things are always changing. And it always comes back to, “You cannot fight nature.”
But you never actually asked, “Can man fight nature?” Or directed the conversation in one way or the other.
Right. This is all without being prompted. Then we had another place where we asked about preferences for where the tax money should go. In order to dip into people’s ideas about economic constraints or economic opportunities vis-à-vis the environment. And the way that worked is over time reading up on issues, I identified 18 different projects that could be used for taxpayer’s money. And I often asked people, “If you were king or queen of Dare County, and you could propose where the tax money goes to or the next five years, where would you put it?” And I had people go through those 18 different cards, which included such things as widening of Hwy 64 toward Columbia, as well as non-Dare projects like the Mid-Currituck Bridge. And then the various beach nourishment projects for KDH and Mirlo Beach, the dredging of Oregon Inlet, various Bonner Bridge ideas — long bridge, short bridge, ferries — and also such things as school money for comparison. And then we asked them to say which they favored, which were maybies, which would be bogus. And people made different piles of what they liked and what they hated. Or some people had an “I Don’t Know” pile. Or an “I Don’t Care” pile. We basically left it to people to sort for themselves. And we also had people comment on it. Because it was a great opportunity for people to say, “Here’s why I like the short bridge.” Or “Here’s why I like the long bridge.’ Or “Here’s why I think ferries are bogus or ferries might work.” And those are the results we need to finally tally.
Was it pretty easy to see where people were getting their info? For example, ORVs and Hatteras, could you hear the echoes of Audubon on one side and the NCBBA on the other? Or even both sides?
Well, particularly in Hatteras, they all said the same thing. They’re all lined up. But a lot of regular folks are also in line with what they say. Most people are pro-access. Particularly, all self-employed people, partially because there’s this whole attitude of, “Don’t tell me what to do.” But the beach buggy people have a very strong message that is very easily heard. And the whole other message that is sometimes swirling around is that no beach access might get us the high-paying, environmentally interested tourists who might come in with big bucks. And that message gets drowned out. It’s not here. Very few people have that message. Because some figures show Hatteras has done well the past couple of summers. And there are northerners who like vacationing there. But people are hung up on the fishermen tourist: “That’s what we’re for and that’s what we want to offer. And by us not offering it, we’re losing money.”
I’ve used the analogy the muffler shop is shutting down, but there’s a windshield shop that could open if they changed tacks. They’re stuck on the muffler shop.
They’re very much stuck on the muffler shop. And that’s a thing I think you see in the news media. That’s more in Raleigh, there were a couple of op-eds saying, “You guys, eco-tourism in Hatteras could be a good thing. High paid tourists would come. And you wouldn’t need to drive on the beach and you could still make money.” But people don’t hear that. Or they don’t’ believe it.
Well, Dare County’s numbers may be up, but Hatteras is still feeling the effects. I know people who are feeling the impacts. I’ve also seen some progress where business are catering to different markets and look for new ways. But I do think there’s a lot of resistance to change. Because you can’t trust the people who aren’t engaged in this fight to be telling you the truth. Because they will tell you what you want to hear if it advances their mission. And only that far. So there’s a lot of bad blood there, too. If you told the people on Hatteras they could make a million bucks catering to bird lovers, they’d probably still say, “I’d rather be poor” out of spite. So part of the problem with these issues getting shanghaied by groups is you don’t trust anyone’s argument because it always fuels their own agenda. And the other thing people say is “I think for myself” but if you go through these talking points, most people don’t think for themselves, they regurgitate what they’ve heard.
Absolutely. The message war is the biggest war of all. What message gets through and why. And that’s something I can’t show, I wish I could. Because we’ve got all these special interests who put things into a particular framework. And then stimulate people along a particular road. But my hunch would still be it has to do with networks and the people they talk to. And that’s one component I wanted to do with these interviews, but we couldn’t because there wasn’t time. I had questions in the script. But we don’t have that data as well as I’d like it.
It would be great to trace the DNA of a thought or idea to its original source, whether it’s the SELC or Chamber of Commerce.
We did ask about media sources. Outer Banks Voice. Coastland Times. Facebook, of course. But the DNA is a good way to put it. That should be my next study: How do you really trace how people get their information? Who do people listen to and who do they believe? In the old days, I think I was the pastors who were influential. But some people watch Fox news, some watch Colbert. And there’s a lot in between.
And people say, “Why haven’t I seen this on the news?” People are conditioned to have the information delivered to them instead of taking the steps to find it or verify it. I think Facebook makes things worse because people share headlines without even reading the story or knowing it’s true. Or they share a funny meme that cements their viewpoint and antagonizes another. But what I liked about the pile sort is it makes people analyze their decision. It also gives an understanding of how hard it is for decision-makers who have to make that call. Because people say they’ll do things all day long. But when they’re forced to actually do them you have to critically consider a choice. It’s still hypothetical but it’s more concrete.
Yes. The pile sort task is my favorite task to tease out people’s opinions. It’s something about putting cards down. And you could move them around. People could make 3 piles, 4 piles, 2 piles. It’s up to the person. And it served two purposes: a) to really record the numbers and the other part was to use it as a talking tool. Because we always wrote down what people said as they were talking about it.
And that’s where the information comes from that while 60% of people are for beach nourishment, two thirds of these people have reservations. They’d say, “I guess I’m for it” or “I guess I have to finance it.” Or “It’s useless but I cannot not put money towards it because it’s our economy.” That’s how I would tease out this information. Basically about 40 percent say it’s a waste of funds. Twenty percent give full support, no reservations. And then 40 percent support it but feel it won’t last — they say, “We have to do it, but it’s stupid.’ So while 60 percent of people are for beach nourishment, two thirds of these people have reservations. And if you look at business owners — people who really own a business, not freelancers — very few of them say no. And that’s a smaller number of people, too. These people are mostly for it regardless. And who are the 20 percent who say “No support, waste of funds”? Younger people who aren’t invested with homes or businesses and older people who are retired.
The people with the least to lose. Is it safe to say that when people supported something that didn’t’ make sense, it was for money? And the more solid the viewpoint, the more that person has at stake — or less?
Yes. It was for money. Yes. And that’s what makes these beach nourishment figures so revealing. And that’s one reason the business people are that much different. You can see it with the middle level of employees. People with a regular paycheck, who work for the government or teachers, they know their money is going to come every two weeks for years to come — and for retirees who’ve made their money — but they have easy talking because they’re safe. And you can see that in their answers. They’re the ones who say, “Beach nourishment is the stupidest thing ever.’ And it’s not that the people who are for beach nourishment don’t have the same facts, but they have to survive. They say, “I’m for it — I hate being for it — but I’m for it.” And the people with a steady job and no fear of losing that job, they have easy talking — and retirement folks of course. Particularly, the people who recently retired here.
I feel like a lot of this conflict is driven by two things: fear of not surviving. And fear of what the other guy is going to do: “If I don’t do this, someone else will.” And then there’s probably a sense of propriety: “If anybody is going to do this, it better be me.” Is it human nature people to justify these actions?
To some degree. And I think that has to do with the scarcity of the environment and the lack of security. A lot of people have moved over time into place of “A buck I can make right now is better than the “maybe, baby.’” So when there’s a conflict between the environment and development, that’s where you hear, “I know this may not be the right thing to do, but I can make money and put that away.” Or “Just this once.” A lot of people said, “I want the environment to stay the way it is, but let me make money first.” So that was the punch line I got out of this study, particularly with economics.
But when it comes to difference of opinion, business owners and the middle aged group stick out — and there’s a certain overlap between those groups — and then the proportion of lifetime spent in Dare County. That middle bracket of 25 to 50 percent of their lives. And these guys have very pronounced opinions about nature versus the economy — and it’s economy first, nature second.
And then the guys on edges are more nature-friendly. The less than 25% and more than 50% seem more nature-friendly.
Yes. And then the Hatteras people are coherent independent of age and economics. Or, as we sometimes say, “They all drink the same Kool-Aid.”
Did you notice that mentality changed by region. Was it pretty localized?
It’s very localized. If you go by KDH to Duck people — and not surprisingly — beach nourishment’s needed, but it’s frivolous. They say— “Yes, yes, we must have it” — but they don’t care about Mirlo Beach. And most Hatteras people are not putting beach nourishment first, either, because few local Hatteras folks own property at Mirlo Beach. But Hatteras people — and again, someone needs to study them and how they get their messages, because they all have the same opinion — for them, only the bridge counts. And they’re the only ones who are 100% “We want the short bridge, and don’t talk to me about anything else.” Whereas a lot of people say “Long bridge, short bridge, I don’t’ care, just give me a bridge.”
But we all know that Hatteras people do their own thing. And to some extent Manteo as well. The older Manteo people stick together: this is their universe, it’s Manteo and that’s all there is to it. And the beach towns you see shifting alliances. Because a lot of them have moved around. Nobody says, “I’m a Kill Devil Hills person,” “I’m a Kitty Hawk person,” “I’m a Nags Head person.” A lot of them define themselves through their churches or their clubs — Rotary Club, Lions Club, or whatever it may be. But for the guys under 45, not so much. You don’t see that happening.
Do they seem part of larger group? Or do they just not define themselves in stricter terms?
I don’t have enough data on it, but they’re just not involved in these groups.
But you don’t need to join groups here to be social. You can go drink beers and be social. I’m always impressed by how stretched out the demographics are here and how inclusive the community is. You can be hanging with people who are 20 years older and 20 years younger. Or more.
That’s absolutely true. And unfortunately our study couldn’t do that, but I would love to have done some network things to see who’s hanging out with whom. Because it’s very peculiar, particularly in Dare County, how people hang out differently. They’re not just meeting in associations or churches.
At one point, just taking the leap to move here was enough of a shared commitment and belief systems to bond people. I think people who moved here 3 years ago, still buy into that. Because it’s still not easy to live here. It is if you have a ton of money to support you and gain your foothold. But I’d argue there’s a kneejerk mistrust of people who do come here like that. I bet it’s harder to buy your way in than it is to starve your way in. Did you research show a mistrust of the wealthy?
Yeah. It’s very much a sense of “us versus them.” And it’s not just “Oh no, another bank.” It’s those rich people who are second homeowners. Or investors who try and move and shake things a little bit. But they’re certainly not part of the social fabric. And I think that’s what a lot of those Rotary Club/Church group, middle aged and older people don’t really see: it’s an organic socializing. It doesn’t need a particular location and it’s not tied to a particular organization. People share, because they love the ocean or some other common kinship, and that’s good enough.
So there’s a question: if they’re 50 and 60 now , does that mean today’s 40 year-old becomes that 50- or 60-year-old?
That’s the big question. Particularly people who are your friends or younger who might be freelance now but might jump onto a big business opportunity moving forward. Because a lot of these guys came here the same way and they may still be cool but now they have mouths to feed and people on pay roll an their opinions have changed. But it’s very difficult to pinpoint.
What about Manteo and Manns Harbor?
Manteo and Manns Harbor are certainly against beach nourishment — for obvious reasons — and some of them are surprisingly pro-regulation. Particularly the older ones. I think it has to do with age and seeing that sometimes regulations are necessary. That left to their own devices, humans will sometimes make a series of selfish decisions. Some of these older people from Mann’s Harbor and Manteo they say, “Thank God for the Park Service. They should buy up more land. So what if I can’t go there like I could in my youth, this is the only thing that works.” I have a lot of solid responses like that from people over 65 who are born here and grew up here. They say, “Thank God for the Park Service. That’s the only thing that keeps these crazies in line.” And they’ve also seen some erosion there, too, and they see that it’s very fragile and it’s all going to go away. I also talked to some young people in the fisheries and they’re really struggling. They want to protect their way of life. But they’re certainly not completely business-minded. They’re not having this, “I want to make a buck at all costs.” And they also recognize that fisheries have a bad rep. They feel misunderstood.
Because they felt feel like regulation issues are displayed as one or the other: kill ‘em all or lock it down. There was no sense of sensible management.
And that’s actually where I came up with that idea that people have to move way form that local focus. Because where they’re really the most confused is that this whole idea of common sense and self-regulation only works when you really close ranks and know everybody in your community. And everyone agrees you don’t overfish or you don’t do ”x” or “y.” Then it does work, because they’re all good stewards of their environment and they don’t want to overdo something. But they have the hardest time seeing that they’ve lost that battle. That there are these people coming in from the outside and they might take away their livelihood because they’re coming in with pockets full of money.
But a lot of people realize we should’ve had better planning early. That once you get on a certain trajectory, it’s over with. Some of these other quotes, you’ll see people are very aware of our situation and our own role creating our problems: “We made a big mistake. We built up the dunes and put houses nearby, that should have never happened.” And 70% of people, except the younger ones who come from outside, — the younger ones who grew up here know this — they know the dunes were man-created. Tourists don’t know that. They think the dunes have always been there. But most everyone who lives here knows it all started in the 30s with these dunes being built. Because once they were built, we had a different dynamic. The water just didn’t come and go, and come and go. We had these dunes now and that meant more permanent housing structures. And once we started filling in the houses underneath, basically it was done. And a lot of people can explain that to you: “Yeah, we should’ve let Mother Nature do her thing. But when the houses stopped being on stilts to let water flow through, that was the beginning of the end.”
Was there any place where everyone agrees?
Oregon Inlet. Ninety percent are for dredging. Even the people who say, “Beach nourishment is bogus, we need to let Mother Nature do its thing” also say we should dredge Oregon Inlet. Why? They feel fisheries should be sustained: “This is our tradition, we cannot let these Wanchese people die out.” So that’s another big contradiction. Because if you want to line it all up: “I’m for the environment, I’m for the long bridge, I’m for no beach nourishment whatsoever, everything should be as natural as possible.” They should also say, “Let Oregon Inlet close up again.” That would be the logical consequence of that train of thought. But that wasn’t the case.
And nobody wants more density. We don’t want to be Myrtle Beach. We don’t want to be Virginia Beach. And for a lot of people, the largest thing that keeps us from being a Myrtle Beach or Virginia Beach is a sewage system. As long as don’t do central sewage we’re good. The moment we allow that to happen — in a wider area than the few things we have, right? — then the high-rises will come, then we have absolute density. And nobody wants more density.
Even the unabashed pro-tourism business types you were talking about? I thought everyone wanted more tourists.
Nobody said there weren’t enough tourists. A few of the younger people said they wished more people would come into restaurants. But you’ve heard about the problem with these big oceanfront homes, is that families frequent the grocery stores more and aren’t going out to eat. So they certainly felt the pinch. But they know the tourists are actually there, they’re just spending their money elsewhere.
That’s an interesting point. Because in many ways the economy is an ecosystem. So what happened there is someone said, “More bodies is better.” And it may be for some groups but not for others. And all these issues are a spiderweb and it’s hard to know how they’ll impact everything.
Be careful what you wish for. Or the law of unintended consequences. And we heard that a lot, too: “We really didn’t know what we were getting into.” And when you look at how the county and towns make a decision, they weigh their options quite well but often they’re pinched and then they make a decision and don’t know where it’s going. Some builders told us that the height restriction made them all build on a slab to maximize space instead of keeping it up on stilts. And if all beach houses were all on stilts and allow the water to go through there would be probably be less damage. But because of the height restrictions, that’s what they did.
What other issues did you talk about? Anything about energy?
We asked about different evaluations of environmental opportunities, such as wind turbines and solar panels — how were they supported or not. We asked about fracking, too, but of course everyone was anti-fracking.
That’s surprising. Because I think a good portion of our community as being pro energy.
Only the affluent, elderly folks, ultra-conservative oil people were for fracking. Almost everyone was against.
What about offshore drilling?
Most people were very much against it, fearing that it would influence tourism.
So, again they were worried about the economy —not the oil hurting the ocean or themselves.
Yes. What it would do with the tourism industry. Surprisingly, with wind turbines it was 50-50. Younger people and business people were very much for wind turbines. It’s some of the older people, or people who were more into the aesthetics and bird people who ware worried about wind turbines. For wind turbines, a lot had to do with unsightliness and birds. Most of it was unsightliness. They say that wind turbines look horrible. It’s not worth the money.
More horrible than a day-glo Wings on the side of the bypass or miles of giant light poles?
It’s funny you say that, because when we asked about eyesores, 80% of the people said the box stores and Wings were an eyesore. 75% said French Fry Alley. They didn’t have to pick one. They could say as many as they wanted. 50% mentioned the light poles. And again, people had to mention, they didn’t confirm. We just say, “What is an eyesore?” This is what people came up with. And in Hatteras it was the Rodanthe Water Park was an eyesore and the Mirlo Beach houses are an eyesore.
But these are things people might say is necessary too. Whether it’s jobs or tax revenue or power. So they say, “I’ll take that eyesore,’ we need French Fry Alley and utility poles.
But you could turn this around: “You’ve been able to live with a Wings store. You could live with a wind turbine.” And that’s where there’s a lot of room for education and where messages may not get across. For example, how much wind turbines might contribute in terms of economic benefits. Because if you could sell it as such, you’re home free. Because a lot of people hear “Wind turbines don’t give us as much energy and they’re not efficient. They produce some electricity, but not enough.” Or, “We pay too much to put wind turbines out there and the return isn’t justified. “And so a lot of people had those numbers down, but they didn’t know any of the positives.
Like the numbers of jobs created or what the potential energy output would be selling wind to other states.
Yes. So this is where you actually start to see how — if you wanted to reform things or get the message across — you could use that material to say, “Here’s where people are hung up.”
A lot of it’s awareness. Drilling says we’ll bring 5,000 jobs to the state. That sounds like a lot, until you find out there’s 11,000 tourism-related jobs in Dare County. Or people talk about wind subsidies as a waste of tax dollars. But nobody considers the billions our military spends in the Middle East. So information is power, but if you’re only getting information fed to you by an interest group it becomes easy to get your viewpoint skewed.
And that’s with everything. That’s the big problem of our time. We never get full information. And the only hope we have for future is people who are willing to think for themselves and not align themselves with a particular group. But if you want to reform or introduce a new idea, you have to understand all the different arguments that people have for or against a particular project and then really pitch against it.
Well, people cherry pick in a lot of ways, too. The Mirlo Beach homeowners are for nourishment instead of a bridge. And they’re quoting Stan Riggs.
Right. And Stan Riggs may not be pro-bridge, but he’s not pro-nourishment either. And here’s where you have to say: What are the various arguments? And what stacks up? Is it the birds might get harmed? Then turn it around and say, “I can show you how birds won’t get harmed.” But then people would have to be open to listen to that argument. And that’s another big problem.
To me, the beach access issue is one the most frustrating. Because I don’t trust the SELC or Audubon. At the same time, I recognize that you can’t have the same rules for a tourism industry of 1970 as you do for 2020. But Audubon and the SELC have been disingenuous. And they are putting out misinformation that’s convenient for their own good. So these wedge issues inevitably play into the interest groups hands by dividing people. Because people assume that because a person holds this viewpoint, they most hold these other viewpoints.
And a lot of people have a middle of the road opinion. Like the beach nourishment: the gung ho people are about 20% — or less than that. And then there’s plenty of people who say it’s a waste of funds that could be persuaded to accept that it’s necessary. But the big thing is one hand doesn’t know what the other hand is saying. And very few people know how much the others have the same opinion as themselves.
So what were the other big issues?
And some people brought up the whole thing with insurance. And if you did the story right now, there’d be even more talk. It’s a snapshot as of summer 2013. And the whole sewage system business is an issue. Some people talked about how the sound is quite polluted, quite yucky and what will we do? They said, “We might need central sewage at some point. We’ve reached a breaking point.”
And that’s a good example of a tough issue. Would people accept high-rises to get cleaner sound water? And is that even possible? I’d argue it would be a net loss, but that might just be me putting my spin on the issue.
And it goes back to the original discussion: you almost need to say to people, , “The only reason you’re not thinking about a sewage treatment system is you don’t trust your neighbors not to build high rises.” If there would be some way to absolutely prevent high rises and higher density and at the same time have a better sewage system, a lot of people would buy into it. Those are the only two reasons why people are against centralized septic system: one is the cost of water would be higher — nobody wants more costs — the only other reason is it’s their last defense against more density.
Was there any issue where people seemed willing to sacrifice for the greater good. Where they said, “I recognize this will hurt me now but in the long run it will be better for my kids and the Outer Banks in general?”
Younger unattached people — some surfers, some fishermen — those who weren’t economically invested, are willing to say, “That might not be so good for me, but I’ll put up with it.” And some older people as well.
So the people with no vested stake and the people with little time left on the planet – again, the people who won’t really feel it. At the same time, did people recognize their hypocrisy?
Yes. A lot of people said — particularly after the card sort — they’d say, “I guess I’m a hypocrite.” So lot of people came away uneasy. And, of course, I wasn’t a part of every interview, so I don’t know how well the students channeled that and said, “It’s okay” or “Other people felt the same way.” But it happened very, very often. Because I always asked the students to record comments. And I saw that a lot. But we tried to cheer them up.
It’s hard. I look at my grass, and all the weeds in it, and I want to dump weed-n-feed in my lawn every year because I think of what I spent on sod. I don’t because I’m worried about the sound. In fact, now I think, “I wish there were no lawns.” But if my landscaper friends read that, they’ll say, “Are you crazy?! That’s my livelihood!”
And that’s a very normal story that’s emerging from this. Think of your own biography – once you’re locked in with kids and a job, that’s when you make these decisions. As opposed to when you’re coming into the tunnel or headed out the other way.
And that’s the 40-60 range you talk about. So what does the future look like for the Outer Banks, knowing this research. Is it a death knell? A wake-up call?
Well, I’m always optimistic. It should be wake up call. And the number one thing people might get out of it is if they could just talk more to each other, and take the time to really get information and really participate in decision-making. And that’s a very difficult thing to do. Most people don’t have time to go to meetings. And everything gets decided right now. Nobody says, “Let’s take our time.” Think about these beach nourishment decisions. Nobody took time to study what happened and consider before moving on to the next project.
It also comes down to the shift between a community that’s locally focused, and that urban sprawl, globally influenced society. You have these smaller communities. But in many ways, we’re bigger. So really the problem lies in the fact that people are at that crossroads of localized community and urban sprawl. And people behave whatever way the wind blows. If it suits you you’re too busy doing your thing to worry about others: “It’s my life, I run my life as I see fit, and I can’t participate.” But when it’s your school it’s an issue. Or if your friends are in trouble, then everyone rallies and donates to help. It’s very local. Where it gets complicated is that Dare County is not Dare County anymore. There’s all these other influences from tourism, transient people, and whatever else, and I think some people would benefit from making coalitions that are wider than just their Rotary Club or “This is what we do here in Manteo” or “What we do here in Hatteras.” Because this whole closed ranks idea of being a locally focused community still works on one level. But on some other level, it doesn’t.
So are we all hypocrites? Is that what it comes down to?
Most of us, yeah. [laughs] Without taking it too far. We have different opinions and we shift them based on how they affect our own backyard. And of course, we all feel we should be able to come to Dare county but we should close the gates behind us.
Are humans hardwired to protect their own interests?
I think it’s more to do with the national culture. And this is a tricky one because I’m European and I spent so much time in China where people have other psychological outlooks. In China, they don’t own property so that’s why they throw around so much money on luxury items. It’s a very different psyche if you can’t buy a house. And they have a different long-term perspective compared to Americans. And the American culture idea is based on having so much space around. And if this doesn’t work out, I’m moving elsewhere. This is a fundamental idea here: I’ll pack up and go to the next hill and start over. That is something other cultures do not have. And that’s why other cultures do more long-term planning, because they can’t move anywhere else and they have to do the right things and be nice to all their neighbors. You have to dig in differently. But even in Dare County there’s always another opportunity. People think, maybe next year. Maybe next month. That whole living paycheck to paycheck, for most it still works. Very few people stop and redo their whole behavior. It’s a couple of adjustments here and a couple of adjustments there. And hope it works out. And most of the time it works out. And if we don’t make it, then we leave.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
WINTER OF OUR DISCONTENT?
Tis the season for behavioral health issues. PORT New Horizon’s Michelle Decker discusses symptoms, myths and options for those in need.
Shorter days. Shrinking schedules. Smaller paychecks. Bigger benders. Despite all our self-professed love for the offseason, it’s often the most psychologically trying time of year. A period when bad moods and worse habits can get the best of anyone. And yet — while we all recognize our community isn’t always 100% happy-go-lucky — we don’t always know how to tell when someone needs help.
“If a person’s not functioning — if they seem like they’ve changed — that’s when you encourage them to go talk to a counselor,” says Michelle Decker, program supervisor for Nags Head’s PORT New Horizons, which provides behavioral health and substance abuse assistance in Dare County. “You say, ‘I don’t know what’s going on, but you seem out of sorts. And I know some places you can go to figure it out.’”
We sat down with Decker to discuss various problems from depression to suicide to substance abuse to see just what the signs are and what resources are available. What follows is a transcript of that conversation; for the edited interview, find a copy of Milepost 2.4.
MILEPOST: What’s your title?
MICHELLE DECKER: Program Supervisor for Port New Horizons. PORT stands for Prevention Out-patient Residential Treatment. PORT Started when Pitt Mental Health was privatized. When we went through mental health reform, they took over some residential adolescent substance abuse inpatient programs. The existing name was PORT. And as we expanded they liked the name so they wanted to keep it.
And how long has that been on the Outer Banks?
PORT was initially involved in the New Horizons demonstration project, which was five years ago. There was sort of an uprising in the community because there wasn’t any substance abuse or mental health services. So the health department and county spearheaded getting funding, the county committed a certain amount of money and the state committed a certain amount of money for he development of New Horizons — which was just substance abuse. And it was funded for three years. And at the end of that funding the state didn’t have money to continue it. So PORT was always in the background, they supervised and hired the clinical staff, but this was actually part of health department. And when state funding dropped out they asked PORT if we would come over and make it a regular behavioral health clinic. So for two years we’ve been doing mental health too. The county supports the substance abuse side; and the syate has some [mental health] funding for people who don’t have insurance, who are 200% of poverty level or below. So there’s availability for everybody. And private fee for service: Blue Cross, Blue Shield, Medicaid, Health Choice. But right now, PORT New Horizons is the only place people without insurance can come for health treatment and get reimbursed. Unless they can talk someone into treating them for free.
So, otherwise you go hire a private counselor.
Yes. Because ResCare — the other place that was able to access state funds — closed June 30.
So in all Dare County, this the option.
For people who are uninsured. Our county has some great private practitioners and therapists.
So you provide the service to anyone who doesn’t have insurance for any kind of mental health concerns: form substance abuse to depression.
Any mental health issue or substance abuse ages four and up. And this is the second year we’ve had a counselor in every Dare County school at least one day a week — sometimes up to 3 days a week.
That’s in addition to a traditional school counselor, who would be more about encouraging you to pick the right college…
Yes, they’re more focused on educational issues. What we’re doing is actually just like going to an outpatient counselor — except we’re located in the school. They’re giving us the space. And we served 150 children last year.
What’s the average age on that? Because I saw this YouTube clip that featured a 5th Grade teacher who had students who were suicidal — granted, this in East LA, but…
Well, I can print you out the study. But for the school project, ECBH — East Carolina Behavioral Health — is the overseer of the Medicaid and the money for the indigent services. It’s called IPRS dollars. They ‘re actually the managed care organization. They authorized the payments and the treatment. They’re who we submit our claims to. They gave us some start-up funding to start, so we had to keep some pretty specific data and it’s a public report.
150 students sounds like a lot.
And this is the thing: we had to stop referrals four months before school was over because we didn’t have enough spaces. We had 189 referrals. And some people didn’t come for whatever reason — we called and the parent didn’t want to, or whatever…
So who does the referrals?
The school counselors. And the teachers.
So it’s not like the child says, “I want help.” The school or teacher says, “There’s something going on here.” But some parents didn’t want to follow up. Why is that you think?
I don’t know whether it was stigma or availability. Because the parent has to come to the first appointment. And really, for some parents, if it’s hourly work and the end of the season, it can be hard to get away for two hours. Others may be struggling with their own substance abuse or mental health problems. And I’ve lived down here eight years but I was shocked at the complexity of the mental health problems our students are having.
But it’s a range of issues too: anxiety, impulse control, sexual and gender identity, eating, mood.
And a lot of elementary kids are having adjustment disorders. Which means they’re having some sort of stress in their life and they’re having issues as a result. They’re not being able to function. Either mom and dad are getting a divorce, so they’re feeling, and they’re interested in going out and playing any more.
Well, the idea for this story came from a couple of places. You always hear about depression this time of year. There seemed to be several suicides in the past year or so. And at the same time, we had a couple stringers suggest an article about depression – seasonal depression, male depression. So, we thought: What is ‘depression’ exactly? What is the connection? And what is the over all picture of mental health on the Outer Banks? How much is stereotype and how much is reality?
Well, I think the best place to start is just to talk about mood disorders. Seasonal Affective disorder is a type of mood disorder. Now, Seasonal Affective Disorder is a depression that has an onset in the fall and winter. And normally, it wouldn’t be as severe as Major Depressive Disorder — which is the technical term for depression — but the symptoms are the same: difficulty sleeping or inability to sleep; feelings of hopelessness and helplessness; thoughts of suicide; weight gain, weight loss. Lack of ability to feel pleasure is really a hallmark of depression. People can have things going on around them in their lives that are normally exciting and not be able to feel pleasure from them.
That’s what’s interesting: because it seems like any of those symptoms are nebulous and — at least by themselves — can be misinterpreted. Is it the combination that makes a difference? How do you know it’s more than just a normal bad day?
We look at a couple of things. One is how long you’ve been feeling that way. So, generally, at a minimum, we say over two weeks. And the other thing we look at is severity: is it keeping you from working? Is it keeping you from participating from activities? Is it impacting your ability to function in your daily life? And if it is then it’s time to get some help.
And that’s when the stigma comes into a play. And maybe this isn’t the case, but I had a conversation with someone about male depression and he said there’s a macho culture where asking for help is taboo for lack of a better term. It’s seen as a sign of weakness. Is that a problem?
Sure. I think its’ more difficult for men to come in and ask for help. But we don’t keep breakdown by sex to see.
From your own anecdotal experience, does it feel like more women come in for help?
Because we have that foundation of substance abuse, I’d say substance abuse runs pretty close — probably 60-40% men. But mental health we probably see more women. And, again, it’s a newer thing — we’ve only been doing it a couple years. And a lot of people were at ResCare until they closed in June.
Is there a profile people fit? Are there similarities? Or is it as diverse as the individuals?
Well, unfortunately, there’s usually a crisis that makes people make the phone call to come in here. Either someone who loves them finally sits them down and says: ”Look: this isn’t okay anymore. You’re not taking care of yourself, you’re not taking care of the kids, you’re not getting to work on time.” Or the boss calls them and says, “You’re not functioning at work.” There’s some crisis that usually brings them into treatment. Or it’s themselves and they’re not happy.
But there’s not an identifiable pattern. Or only identifiable pattern after the fact.
That’s one of the things that’s hard about any behavioral health service — substance abuse or mental health — is that what gets somebody to seek treatment can be so unpredictable. Like, for substance abuse, someone can have a blackout and it scares the daylights out of them and they’re in here to get treatment. Whereas someone else, they’ve been arrested four times, they’re losing their kids, and they still don’t want to come to treatment. It’s very individualized.
So pulling back, what is the mental health situation on the Outer Banks. What are the problems in the community?
I don’t think there’s any more significant amount of problems on the Outer Banks than anywhere else. I think the issue is a lack of resources. There is one licensed psychiatrist on the Outer Banks. We do all our psychiatry through telemedicine. They’re PORT employees in Greenville or Ahoskie or what have you. But it’s not for lack of trying to recruit. We’ve been trying for years to get a psychiatrist to come here.
Is it the usual problem: it costs more to live here and you can’t pay as much? That seems to be the formula for everything else around here.
I don’ t know why psychiatrists don’t want to live here.
Maybe they know something we don’t.
I’ve heard people say there’s not the cultural things, the shopping, things like that, which I think is crazy. But…
Well, if you don’t like being outside and being in nature, there’s not a lot of reason to live here. I know couples who were split on moving here, the wife didn’t want to come.
Because there’s no Target. The Target’s too far [laughs]. I felt that way personally a little bit. But I worked for Albemarle Mental Health and they paid their psychiatrist much higher than the national average and they had a hard time getting them to stay. But I think there’s just a shortage of specialty doctors. And even more critically, there’s a shortage of trained child and adolescent, board-certified psychiatrists. And PORT has an office in Elizabeth City and that doctor telemeds a couple hours a week with us to see younger children. And they can certainly drive up there, if they’re able to. But a lot of people aren’t able too, whether they don’t have car or they don’t have the resources – the gas money – to get there.
And a couple hours a week isn’t going to see but so many kids. I don’t know what the average session is.
Fifteen to 20 minutes. Kid can be 30 minutes — for medication checks. Not for therapy. Our primary care physicians around here take up a big part of the mental health treatment. I think if you talked to any of them, they’re doing a lot of prescribing of behavioral health, especially for anxiety and depression. I think. You’d have to look this up and make sure it’s correct. But I believe it’s like the number 3 or 4 reason people go to their primary care physician is depression or anxiety.
Wow. What does that say? Is that our culture in general? Is that a reflection of how hard it is to live down here? And there’s a certain pride people take in that fact, too, but it’s not a place where you’re going to launch a whole new career or something. So I can see where that adds a level of anxiety – when the shifts stop coming or restaurants close or whatever. Is that part of what feeds that anxiety?
Any major life change is going to feed anxiety: divorce, job change, job loss. Here’s a local example. Apparently they’ve changed the way they’re formulating how much you get for unemployment benefits and its’ caused a significant amount of stress. Our clients have been talking about it because they’re no going to be able to live off unemployment; they’re going to have to figure out how to supplement themselves so they can get by. And it’s causing a lot of stress.
I wonder what the Internet does for this stuff. Because there’s a lot of comments that say “good riddance.’
I think that’s something that people don’t get about depression. I worked with a psychiatrist once — you know it used to be called melancholia — and he said, “I wish they’d kept that or come up with a different name other than depression.” Because everyone thinks they know what depression is. That they’ve been depressed when things have gone wrong in their life. They think they’ve known that experience. But in clinical depression, it impacts your ability to perceive what’s going on around you accurately. So, you will have people that love and support you. But you don’t feel like that. You don’t feel like they’re helping you, you don’t feel like they care about you. That is clinical depression. When some commits suicide, the question is always why? Why did they do that? They had a great business, they had a family, people liked them. But if they were experiencing depression, they didn’t see it that way. That was not their reality. What reality was is not what the depressed person sees.
So it’s a complete distortion.
Right. And it’s due to — all of our emotions and feelings are chemicals that are generated in our brain. And the easiest example is the day you get married, hopefully you’re really happy. When someone dies, you feel sad. Life can change our chemistry in our brain. And sometimes it does it in a normal way and we can cope with it. And sometimes it responds in an abnormal way. And the other thing is we’re all born with a certain amount of stress tolerance. There’s been some research that says some people are naturally better able to tolerate stress than others. The good news is you can change that by going therapy and learning skills and tools to strengthen those skills. So you can improve it — it’s not hopeless. But some people are just better able to handle what life throws at them.
That does seem to hold true. So when it comes to solutions, how much is treatable? And how much is medication? Because I’m prescription med freak. I don’t want to to take a pill to feel normal. I don’t want to take cholesterol meds. So is that a problem?
I think it’s too much in the opposite direction. I think American culture is, “Oh something’s wrong with me, I feel uncomfortable, give me a pill.”
So what’s the philosophy? And what’s the balance between medication and training?
You have to look at how the symptoms are impacting that individual and how they’re functioning. Because there’s two strategies. Everybody who comes here has an assessment by a licensed counselor. And they talk about symptoms and treatment options. And the best treatment for depression and anxiety usually is a combination of medication and therapy. But a lot of times people don’t want to do the therapy. They want to take the medicine. And a lot of anxiety symptoms can be resolved with therapy. And if you just take a pill every time you get anxious, it’s like taking cold medicine — it doesn’t cure the problem. We do believe in therapy, individual and group especially, it’s highly effective.
But it’s almost more stigmatized. People are more likely to say, “I’m on Xanax” than “I have therapy on Tuesday.”
Oh, absolutely. I guarantee you, if I called 10 of my friends and said, “Oh man, I just lost my job,” three would be like, “You want some Xanax?” Because it’s culturally acceptable. But part of it roots back to not having enough [behavioral health] providers so the primary care physicians are dealing with the anxiety and depression. And they don’t have therapists. They have medication.
But it’s a good point. There’s something to be said for using medication to solve a problem but there’s also a lot of just attacking the symptoms instead of the cure.
I mean, we’ve got stuff to do, so we want to feel better so we can go about our business. And if you can take a Xanax and get rid of your anxiety and go to work, you think, “Okay.’ But the thing is you build tolerance with any benzodiazepine — Valium, Xanax, Klonopin — that’s so heavily prescribed in this area. One’s gonna work for a while, and then you’re gonna need two and then you need three and then everyone’s calling you a drug addict and you can’t get the medicine you need or you feel sick.
And all your trying to do is go to work. You’re trying to do the right thing. Your motivations are good.
Opiates are like that, too. It’s an epidemic down here and everywhere in the United States. You have surgery and you start taking Percocet and then….
That’s my biggest shock. All the heroin rumblings, I wonder how many are people who got hooked on painkillers and moved on.
I’d say a good bit of ‘em.
I’d be interested to know. Because there’s always been some sort of drug culture here, but it was mostly pot, and drinking and cocaine was the hardest stuff. That was the pattern. And the last five years it’s been…
Pills. And it’s young kids. We have a very small Suboxone program. Suboxone is an opiate antagonist — it’s actually an opiate too — and it’s mixed with another drug called Naloxone. And it keeps people from getting dopesick. Because that’s part of the problem. And it’s not life threatening but when you get hooked on opiates, whether it’s because of a medical problem or recreational use, you eventually need them to function. When you try to stop, you will get the worst case of — it’s not even fair to compare to the flu. You are vomiting, muscle cramps, pain for five to 14 days. I mean it is horrible. So people wake up and they can’t function. Or their surgery’s over and they try to get off this medicine and they can’t do it. Well, Suboxone, we give it to them and it fills the receptors. They don’t get high, they don’t get dopesick, and it inhibits the cravings, too. So we give them that and we drag them in here and we try to give them therapy and give them education and get hem to build the tools they need to stay clean, and then eventually you work on tapering them off that medicine. But we have 30 [treatment] slots. They’re full. Constantly. You have to have a special license from the DEA to [dispense] it. Anohter doctor does it here, I think he has 100 spots. They’re full. And we have a crap-ton of people who go to Virginia for it. And we get two calls a day for it.
Well, that’s what William Burroughs said in Junkie: “I need heroin to get up in the morning, to shave and eat breakfast.” I think some people don’t get that it is a sickness and it is impossible to function without it. But I think we have a very tight nurturing community in a lot of ways — but we also have a tight judgmental community in other ways.
Well, people make judgments based on their own experience. They think, “I lost my job and I got through it and I was fine.” Or “I had surgery and I had to be on Vicodin for three weeks and I was fine.” And they think their experience is the truth for everybody. And it’s not. Really, a lot of this is biologically based. Addiction is a great example. I’ve seen 30 year-old men who’ve been drinking for two years and they’re on the verge of liver failure. And I’ve had 70 year-old truck drivers who came in because they got a DWI and they’re fine otherwise. It’s biological. The difference is biological. When alcoholics try to stop and can’t their whole biology fights them. You have to be receptive to the idea that people experience things differently because we’re different biologically.
And it’s probably hard for people to accept hat too. They think, “I’m a failure because I cant ‘stop this. or I’m inferior because I’m depressed.” Is that where the hopelessness comes from?
People who experience addiction or clinical depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder — one of the first things we try to do is show them this is a medical problem. That this is a brain chemistry problem. That it’s not caused because they’re deficien in anyway as a human being or their moral character is bad. Whatever moral reason they think — that God is paying them back for the bad things they’ve done. People come in with all kinds of reasons. So one of the first things we try to do is educate them that this is medical problem and there’s solution. Now part of the solution is behavioral. How you eat, how you decide to cope with things, how you decide to think about things, monitoring your thinking. The treatment of depression — besides the medication — is getting people to be mindful of what they think: What am I believing about what’s going on that’s making me upset? So let’s say I spend 3 hours with you today. Tomorrow I see you in Walmart and you walk right by me. And I’m like, “What did I do to him?” And I get myself all in an uproar because I believe you’re blowing me off and you think you’re better than me. Well, maybe the truth is you didn’t see me. Or you were busy because you’re kid was screaming. So we teach people to break down their thinking and confront that. Does this make sense? Because depression will skew what you believe.
You go straight to the worst possible answer. So you say, look at the spectrum of options; don’t assume the worst.
That’s right. We train people to do that. And they’ll see they have a tendency to personalize everything. If something’s going wrong, it must be because I had an impact on it.
It sound pretty egotistical. To people in these situations tend to be self-absorbed?
Depression is a selfish disease. People do come off as very selfish and that can make things very difficult for loved ones. Because they are working t heir tales off to figure out how to help the person and it’s never enough. And it’s very frustrating for the people around them. And there can be a lack of appreciation because their perceptions are not accurate at that time.
I bet it can sound accusatory at times, too, because you’re telling people they have a problem. And it’s not a nice problem. And like anything, you have to want to change to do something. You can’t force people.
Nope.
So you do you broach the subject? Are there tips? Are there ways? I’m sure if you say, “you need to see a doctor” without sounding accusatory or making them feel worse?
I think the best way is to try and come from — well, number one, take a step back when you’re not frustrated with the person because they’re not going to work for the third day and you’re ready to pull out your hair. Or the laundry didn’t get done. plan it, as opposed to doing it at a time when you’re really frustrated. I think you have to come at it from a place of love and compassion and concern: “Hey, I’m really concerned about you.” Who are the people in that person’s life who they’re usually receptive to? It might not be the husband or wife, girlfriend or boyfriend. It might be mom. Or dad. Or a friend who can sit down from a place of concern and say, “This is what we’re seeing? What’s going on? What do you think? I’m concerned that you’re depressed.” And know the options. Do they have a relationship with their family doctor? Because that’s a good place to start and a lot of people do.
And it sounds like it may be less of judgment thing to. I don’t know why I keep coming back to that, but it seems like people do feel that way.
Well the other part of this is sometimes people just don’t have the skills to manage what life throws at them. They’re not mentally ill, but they were brought up in chaotic, dysfunctional environments and they were never taught the skills to manage life. So they developed these really — we call them maladaptive ways of functioning.
Example.
People who use intimidation to get what they want. If anything happens at all, they’re screaming and yelling — because people respond to that. Other people learn to be completely dependent on others and develop this kind of helplessness. Other people get manipulative to get their needs met. And eventually all of those things tend to get people in trouble. And that’s not a chemical problem with how their brain is functioning. Usually, they develop these skills because they work. If somebody were to come in here and say, “I’d like to see Michelle, can you see if she’s available?” The desk would say, “Sure. Go ahead and have a seat.’ And they’d come back and I’d say, “I’ll get there as soon as I can.” But if someone is screaming out there, the desk doesn’t even have to get me. I hear them and I get up and I respond to it. So people learn they can get their needs met by being aggressive and loud. So it’s really a therapy issue. And we say, ‘That works, but it’s not the most effective way and it’s causing other problems. You’ve got a restraining order now and these ‘communicating threats’ charges.” And there is a separation between the people who are having a chemical problem and people who don’t have the most effective ways of coping. Does that make sense?
Sure. You have to discern what’s what. And I’m sure sometimes its’ a combination.
Exactly. But if they’re coming here, I don’t know why anyone would discourage somebody from getting help. No matter what they think. Even if they think they’re lazy and ridiculous, if somebody’s not functioning well — if somebody’s not able to take care of themselves, to work everyday to be a productive member of their community, whatever that means for them — why wouldn’t you, if you care about them, encourage them to get some help?
So what are the parameters of that? At what point are you goofing off and at what point are you a trainwreck?
It goes back to your ability to function. If somebody wants to surf all day and they can support themselves and have a roof over their head, there’s nothing wrong with that I’m not here to judge somebody’s lifestyle. But if somebody has rent to pay and bills to pay and they can’t get up out of their bed because they feel hopeless and helpless and they’ve lost 20 pounds because they haven’t eaten, then that’s a problem.
To people develop depression at a certain age more than others?
The age onset that’s really common for behavioral health disorders is between, say, 16 and 21. When you’re body’s developing and there’s major changes going on in your brain, that’s probably the most common. and there’s childhood depression and childhood schizophrenia, but it’s rarer. You usually see problems developing between 16 and 23, college.
That’s mental health issues like schizophrenia stuff like that.
Yes. And for women and men, a major life change can trigger depression. Divorce. Job loss. Loss of parents.
So the older you get, the more likely you are to face these issues. So chances are you’re going to have to deal with sometime — either yourself or someone around you. So do you get busier in the wintertime?
There are trends. Springtime is the time for hope and renewal, and everyone is very hopeful things will work out and they make changes. And things tend to deteriorate over the summer. August and September is a hot and heavy time. I think people have been through the summer, their job is ending, they realize their substance abuse is out of control. So fall’s a big time for people get sober. Then things tend to die down again around the holidays because – again – it’s a period of hope. People think, “Oh things will work out this year.”
I always heard holidays were a depressing time. Is that just a myth.
I don’t think it’s a myth. People have expectations around holidays. But it’s usually after because it’s a let down: “My family’s still not perfect, Uncle Joe’s still an ass, and my kids didn’t behave again, somebody didn’t come and see me.”
So is that Seasonal Depression?
Seasonal Depression would start in the fall and they think it sis related to the decrease in daylight. People are indoors more and they’re not getting the amount of vitamin D you need. If you’re deficient in Vitamin D, you’ll be tired, you’ll be exhausted. And even now the primary care doctors are including that vitamin D test in physicals. So that’s one thing we’re starting to look at. But if you had seasonal depression, it would start in the fall and gradually get worse throughout the winter until you felt like you didn’t want to go outside the house. But most people with seasonal depression you’re functioning, you just don’t feel as good. But there’s two other different kinds of depression. There’s major depression — and major depression is usually cyclical. You’ll have a period where you’re fine, maybe even without your medicine, and then things will slowly start deteriorating: you don’t want to be around people maybe, you start feeling more irritable, you have hard time getting motivated to do things. At it’s worst, people have a hard time even getting out of bed. I mean, I’ve seen people so depressed that they defecate in their bed. It can get that bad. Start getting suicidal thoughts. And then, even without any intervention, it just starts lifting and you feel a little better. But the problem is this is your life. And it’s a rollercoaster. And it’s horrible. But it’s also part of the problem in treating depression, because you take your Prozac for two months and you’re feeling better and you’re done. And you stop taking your medication when you’re feeling better naturally and you’re okay for along time and six months later you’re back down here and it hits you again. And you’re like, “What did I do?” well you just have a disease, depression.
So it’s not necessarily environmental. It’s mostly biological.
It can be just biologically based. And with seasonal depression, it might be that that’s their cycle, and they feel it in the fall and winter they have this mild depression and then it lifts again.
But you don’t necessarily see numbers spike in the winter time.
With depression, I don’t think we have enough experience with the mental health stuff here after two years to collect the data.
So what’s the relationship with depression and suicide?
In depression, what we know is that suicide occurs — if depression is this horrible bell curve and you’re at your worst at the bottom, that’s not when most people kill themselves. This is when most people are worried, because the person isn’t talking, they’re not returning phone calls, they’re not showing up at church like they used to, they’re taking more sick days off. But that’s not when people commit suicide. People commit suicide later, when they’re starting to get better. Because they don’t have the energy to do it when they’re at their worst. But later on, when they start feeling better but they can still remember how bad they felt and how much they don’t ever want to ever feel that way again and they’re still impaired — their reality testing is still impaired — but they have the energy to do it, that’s when people commit suicide. So people need to be aware that a big risk for suicide is when people first start to get better.
So what do you do? How do you react?
Well, if it’s someone you care about, you try to make regular contact and make sure they have support and you’re available to talk to. It’s hard when it’s someone who lives alone. What we try and to is develop a support system so there are people around them who will be mindful and notice a change. Who are ware and educated about this. But if you have someone you live with we can educate you about this.
But you always hear: “No one saw it coming.”
It’s not always telegraphed. That’s true. The people in treatment here — we have very few suicides with people in treatment. It’s usually people who aren’t in treatment. And the majority of suicide attempts are impulsive decisions. Usually triggered by an event losing a job, getting arrested, being rejected by a significant other. Or something like no one remembered their birthday or anniversary of a loss. Individuals who are experiencing clinical depression often feel things disproportionately…..sadness, sense of loss, hopelessness are magnified and become unbearable.
On the other hand some suicide attempts are planned, and they likewise can be difficult to see coming. If an individual is planning often you may notice unusual behaviors such as giving things that are important to them away, making wills, making final visits to see people. They are the people coming out of the deep depression and have made a decision they no longer want to live that way.
A new report, said suicide rate here was 4% higher than the state. And there were 65 ideations at the Outer Banks Hospital between 2010 and 2012.
Ideation is having thoughts. But generally, to be admitted to a hospital, you not only have to have a thought but you’ve also thought of a plan. It’s not abnormal to have thoughts like, “Oh I’m so frustrated. I wish I didn’t have to go on today” or “I wish I could just go to sleep.” But if you get to the point where it’s like, “You know what? I could drive my car into that tree or run off the bridge.” Or “I could take that medicine in the cabinet.” When you start thinking those thoughts, that’s a crisis. That’s when they need urgent help. But anyone who says anything about suicide you should take seriously and contact a professional.
Because that’s the other myth: “the cry for help.” That people who talk about it never do it.
That’s not true. And don’t be afraid to ask the question. Ifyou observe someone that is acting differently, isolating, irritable, sad and depressed, making excuses not to participate, having crying spells, increasing alcohol consumptions you need to ask ” have you been having thoughts that life is not worth living anymore.” If the answer is yes you should urge them to seek professional help through a crisis line, mobile crisis, primary care physician, or simply walk into PORT New Horizons.
So it sounds like there’s no distinct checklist.
Well, there’s other things that make people at higher risk. If they’ve had a family member who’s committed suicide — a parent or a sibling — it makes you more at risk. People who try once are more likely to try again. If you use substances it makes you more at risk, because it impairs your judgment. If you’re depressed anyway and you’re drinking or smoking marijuana it’s going to impair your ability to make decisions and more likely to follow through on your decisions. Men have a higher risk than women. Because they’re more lethal. Men tend to use guns and women tend to use medication. So a lot of women overdose on pills and someone comes across them and they go to the hospital and get treatment. If you decide to shoot yourself you’re generally successful.
Any specific local factors that make us have a higher risk? The report discusses lack of services – substance abuses, psychiatric. Another report said poorly populated areas.
I don’t know about that.
I guess it makes sense to some degree. But even though we have a small population density it is a tight community.
There is a strong sense of community here. And it’s a very helpful community, too. But, thinking about what you’re saying, there’s the whole Frisco/Hatteras mentality, too. Some people there aren’t as receptive to treatment because they’re fiercely independent. I came from Maryland, and I do think there’s very fiercely independent people down here. We don’t expect every bit of comfort within our reach, or you wouldn’t move here.
So it can be a bad thing. We think of it as matter of pride, but sometimes you do need help. And getting people to admit that can be hard.
Some people truly it doesn’t cross their mind that they should. Because they’ve always gotten by. And if it does, it’s difficult. We have counselors go to Frisco twice a week, so we have 16 hours of service down there.
And it’s probably filled.
Uh huh. And it’s insufficient. Because sometimes seeing a counselor once a week or twice a month just isn’t going to cut it. You need more time than that and it’s not available down there.
In that situation, does talking to a friend help?
It depends on the friend. [laughs] If the friend says take a couple Xanax and you’ll be fine it’ll blow over, that’s not good.
Or to man up. Stop crying.
Sure. But there’s also some places where that’s appropriate. My kid plays baseball, if he gets hit by a ball and it’s not in his face he needs to suck it up. That’s a good life lesson, too. But if a person’s clinically depressed that’s a horrible thing to say. And so how do you make a judgment? You do the safe thing and you encourage someone, if they’re not functioning — if they seem like they’ve changed. If they seem like they’re different and they’ve changed — you encourage them to go talk to someone and to figure it out. You say, “I don’t know what’s going on but you seem sad, you seem out of sorts, and I know some place you can go talk to a counselor and figure it out.”
And I know there’s the 211 service.
We’re on 211. East Carolina Behavioral Health that’s responsible for the behavioral health services in the 19 counties, they have a 1 800 number you can call day or night and they will refer you. There’s a mobile treatment team that’s run by integrated family services that’s completely free, they’ll respond to your home 24/7 -– if you want them, they won’t come if you don’t. Trained counselors will come out to your house — or they’ll meet you at the 7/11 or Food Lion parking lot if you want — for any mental health, substance abuse. Or if you have a family memer with a developmental disability they’ll respond to that and it’s completely free.
So what about survivors? Any suggestions for them?
It depends on the individual and how it impacts you. Expect to not be happy. Expect to be angry at the person. That’s normal. They took their own life; it’s preventable. Expect to be angry. It’s normal to be sad. It’s a grief experience. And with grief, if it goes beyond a certain point where you’re not functioning. If after a certain period, a week, two weeks — I hate to put numbers on it because it’s different for everybody — but if you’re not functioning, if you’re not returning to yourself after what’s a reasonable time then you should go talk to someone.
Is there a genetic connection?
There’s a genetic link for all mental health illnesses. If your parents have depression you’re more at risk for bipolar, if you’re parents are bipolar you’re more at risk for depression. If it’s in your family, you’re more at risk for developing it.
I guess that’s the reason to go into schools to catch stuff early.
Well, the department of mental health and hygiene have great reports based on how many substance abuse counselors are in each county and they figure out how many kids should be in mental health services based on our population. And when they looked at our area, they said based on what we know in general about the prevalence rate among kids, we were way off in this area. Services weren’t being utliized. So they put grants out for us to hire staff. And ECBH told me other day that in Dare County, we have one of the highest percentage of uninsured children in the services because it’s available in the school. And I’m really proud of that. But we also have really good private counselors in the area. But they cost money.
How bad off are our kids?
Here’s the thing. I’ve had one of the elementary school counselors come in twice and tell me about two school children that have been sexually abused — but it’s so hopeful that they’re getting care now. They’re going to have treatment for that trauma and hopefully not turn to drugs or alcohol or develop deep depression or poor self esteem and make all the bad choices that come as a result. They’re going to work through the trauma hopefully. And psychiatry and behavioral health is among the newest sciences. And we’re looking and training ourselves using these evidenced-based treatments. And they’re treatments that have been studied and been shown to be effective. So there are five of us now who have been through a specialized training to treat trauma. They know if you use a strategy to help a child with trauma that it has good outcomes; that it works. So it’s not just coming in and talking and saying, “Oh you’re gonna be okay buddy! You can do it!” [claps her hands] We’re learning techniques that are proven to really help people.
There are a lot of people who think psychologically/psychiatry doesn’t work. It’s a harder sell. Your kid breaks his arm, you go to the doctor. But with your field, it’s not such an obvious problem.
It’s not, “You’re depressed, we’re going to give you six treatments and you’re gonna be better.” It’s not that concrete.
Maybe that’s part of the problem, too. You don’t have an endpoint.
Because it depends. Most of our medicines for depression have to get into your system four-to-six weeks to work. There’s how severe the symptoms are; how motivated they are to learn the things hey learn. How much support somebody has is a huge issue. We have plenty of people who can’t get here for whatever reason – because they have to work, and we have some evening hours but . . .
So when you look at behavioral health on the Outer Banks, what’s the most pressing issue or cause for concern?
Well, as far as totality, probably addiction is still the most damaging.
And I’d assume that has to go up in the wintertime.
Yeah. Unstructured time, for addicts, is not a positive thing. Not having a job to go to and having to much time on your hands is damaging. It costs our society so much. But I till go back to stigma. Getting people to be receptive that treatment is out there and it will work and to support people who are doing that. And resources: I mean, if you’re in Hatteras — if I was in Hatteras and I had to get my son up here for counseling once a week I don’t know how I’d do it. And then there’s gas money…
I do think being understanding is important. If you’re employee is in tat situation, don’t just…
Fire them. Try to get them some help. But I’ll tell you we have so many people dragged in here by our other clients that are like, “I’ve been there, the people are really nice, I swear.” We get a lot of referrals from our clients – for whatever reason, somebody lands here and their family or friends end upcoming in. So the addicts drag each other in here, too, a lot, but I think it’s having someone say, “You know what? It’s okay.” People have that fear of being judged. It’s a huge thing. Even if they’re receptive to getting help, they’re afraid of what you’re going to think when they tell their secrets.
I’ll be honest: when I pulled up, I thought, “Dang…”
I knew he was on the dope! But this is our thing: whatever your problem is, we’re gonna try and help. And if you’re worried about walking in that front door, then we’ll meet you at the back. If that’s the big issue, then you can park someplace else and scoot in the back. We try to accommodate people. Because some of that is very real: if you’re a teacher or a policeman seeking help for a mental health problem? But you can go get 150 Xanax from your primary care doctor and nobody thinks you have any problem whatsoever.
What’s the success rate like?
Well, this is the problem: everybody wants to know that. But I would caution anybody if they hear somebody say a success rate they need to say, “What does that mean?” For example, the only thing we measure our success rate with is our substance abuse intensive outpatient program. If outpatient isn’t enough, you come in here three times a week and it is like SA boot camp. We’re going to teach you everything about substance abuse and being sober and every tool you can possibly use. And the average person stays about 12 weeks. But we’ve had huge arguments about what is success. Because if you’re in that program, and you’ve been sober 2 months, and two weeks before you’re to be discharged you relapse. You come in; you share with the group that you relapsed. Should I not graduate you? And we’ve had this discussion with the supervisors of all the PORT Clinics. Because we want success to be they’ve been clean for fou weeks, they’ made progress toward their goals, but in realty we’ve had people who are clean for 8 weeks and then relapse. Some people say at a year, 70% of our people are still sober. But how do they know? Are they calling and asking? Are they doing drug tests? And as a field we’re still struggling with that question too: how can we prove what we’re doing is effective? And that’s where these evidence-based treatments come in.
It has to be more effective than doing nothing, though.
You would think. But that’s struggle for this field. And that’s why we get trained in techniques that have had some scientific research showing they’re effective. But we’re really in our infancy of being able to prove it.
But personally, do you think it’s making a positive difference?
I know it is. We’ve had people come in here who couldn’t get on the liver transplant list because they couldn’t stay sober — and they’ve been able to stay sober and get a liver transplant. We’ve had people who’ve gotten their children back who were taken away form them. We had one woman who was so depressed — I mean she was just suicidal constantly. She wanted to die every day. And she came in the other and had a huge smile on her face. She’s working, she’s in a relationship, she’s functioning. And that’s why you do it. What’s the percentage that happens to? It’s hard to quantify.
But there’s three good stats right there.
Well, they say people get better because hey feel the fire, not because they see the light. So we do see that. Generally, people are coming in because they’re feeling some fire somewhere. But then it’s how to keep people motivated. And you get trained in special techniques you know will work and you try to be engaging and keep people trying. And you’ll find 10 people who’ll say, “New Horizons is great they’re wonderful there.” And then you’ll find that one who says, “That bitch Michelle threw me out of the Suboxone program, they wouldn’t help me.” I mean I can guarantee we do everything we can to try and help someone. But it gets to the point where it’s not working, especially with addictions, we’re going to refer you to go inpatient. And if you don’t want to do that, do I continue to provide you with something that’s not effective? So those are the days that are hard here: when you talk to someone and say, “This isn’t working, what can we do?” And they don’t want to do anything different.
People have to change. It’s not just going to happen.
And in all likelihood, if you’re going to change, your going have to do something you don’t want to do. You’re going to have to try something different. And that’s uncomfortable. So that’s where support comes in. There’s not any community services out there so you have to take what you learn in here. And it’s nice if you have a support person who can help you and encourage you and prompt you and be by your side.
Do you encourage people to bring people in?
Oh yes. We encourage families to come in and we have a family support group that’s free for whoever’s interested. I mean, anybody in the community. If someone had a son with an active addiction and wasn’t in treatment, they could come. Or if someone who has a child in Virginia who’s depressed and they’re dealing with it, they can come too.
So what are the take home points? If you could get a message out the community, what would it be?
That mental health and substance abuse issues are treatable illnesses. That is not a hopeless situation. There is help available. It might not be on your terms, and it might not be located where you want it to be, but it is available. And mostly that it’s treatable. You should never give up hope on anybody. I’ve been doing this 20 years and I can’t predict who comes in. There’s people who come in who I think, ‘They’ve got everything going for them; they’re gonna beat this thing.” And it’s a real challenge. And then there’s people I think, “Here they come again” and they get better. So you don’t ever give up on anyone. And there’s no shame in asking for help.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STAGE NEXT
When it comes to Roanoke Island Festival Park, the local community roars with opinions. Executive Director Kim Sawyer addresses their requests, concerns — and what’s in store for the facility’s future.
“Living History.” That’s what gets top billing on Roanoke Island Festival Park’s welcome sign. What gets the most attention? Live music. No wonder. While people must pay to see the facility’s 16th century costumed interpreters, board the Elizabeth II or get hands-on with American Indian Town’s educational displays, the sound stage is wide open and impossible to miss. So, when the budget crunch hit the state facility big-time this year, critics and fans alike roared for more concerts and events. But as Executive Director Kim Sawyer, notes: “It’s not like those old movies where Judy Garland says to Mickey Rooney, ‘Hey! Let’s get on Broadway!’ And, boom, they’re on Broadway. People need to learn the steps to get there. And as much as people love concerts, that’s not all we do.” Sawyer sat down with us to discuss just how the park plans to maximize their assets — from concerts to Boy Scouts to blushing brides — and what that means for the park’s future and fundamental purpose.
MILEPOST: Spell your name and tell me your position and give me a quick bio of you how you came to the Outer Banks and got involved in Festival Park.
KIM SAWYER: Kimberly Sawyer, Executive Director. I was director of a craft cooperative in Camden, North Carolina. And at the time it was the largest cooperative in the country. And I just wanted a change, and there was something with First Flight [Foundation], and I applied for the position. And I started off being the communications coordinator and I ended up being the administrator for the state park for the program. Had my office at Wright Brothers. So that’s been 10 or 12 years, and I remained with the department after that. I was called the Eastern Region Administrator; I worked with the secretary’s office on different projects throughout the state. And when the last [Festival Park] director left, I was asked to serve as an interim director. And then ended up having he position full time.
And that was three years ago.
Yeah. And I always liked the marriage of creativity and business. I think that’ a great marriage and pretty much thorough my career that’s what you see. And that’s what you see here; you see us trying to promote history but in a fun interesting way to get to the general public.
What about the park? It’s main thrust is educational outreach. It’s field trips, tours…
The ship started it first, thirty years ago. And then around that was built the park, 16 years ago. And the history center was originally part of that as well. And from that it’s grown. So they started off with the ship, the settlement site and the adventure museum. About two years ago, American Indian town was built. And that’s part of separate funds — I’m always really cautious about that, because I know people are like, “What do you mean they’re upgrading something? They don’t’ have any money!” So let me be clear [speaks directly into the recorder]— please hear me on this Mr. Recorder — back in 2007, the park got some money its’ called R&R — repair and renovation money — and that helped build American Indian Town. And that was my first summer here. Just executing the project, the project had already been developed but we had to make sure it got built. And it did. And then the remainder of those funds are to help update the adventure museum and the sales ticket area. And so that was really the latest addition in 2009. And it really was a tribute to the history of Roanoke Island. Which is important. This is where people first came and spoke English in the Americas. And 22 years later Jamestown established the permanent settlement.
And so, really, number one: we want people to have a good time. We want them to have a good time with the costumed interpreters, and they get a kick out of seeing the ship, and they can go in back and talk to the blacksmith. And maybe, if they’re well-behaved, they get a nail. So really we’re focused on family fun, and we find that we have a lot of families here. And they like to try on costumes and take pictures. And talk to our interpreters.
At first, the Governor’s budget eliminated all funding for the park. You ended up with $450,000 from the state for two years; and you’re requesting $325,000 from your 501(c)(3), Friends of Elizabeth II. But that’s still basically half of what you used to get. What’s the plan?
Well, we knew that our appropriation was scheduled to be cut, and we had started planning for the inevitability of those cuts so we had a five-year plan in place. Our commission voted on a preliminary budget back in April, which included — what we would have gotten from the state was $1. 5 million. So in essence, with the announcement of the governor’s budget they accelerated our cuts. And that’s not unlike a lot of other agencies or, lets’ face it, a lot of other businesses in our communities who are running on tight budgets. I always get concerned because I know people hear those numbers, and they’re probably sitting in their businesses thinking, “I wish someone would give me those funds.”
But I remember — because I’m a workaholic, and it was here pretty late at night — it was about 10 o’clock and I got this email. We’re under the umbrella of coastal resources, but our funds come to us separately. So our funds aren’t comingled with the department of coastal resources. And this email came from Coastal Resources and it said, “Hey, we’re only going to get a 15% cut – except the Roanoke Island commission, and you’re going to get a 50% cut.” And so there it started. And so what we started to do was think beyond just the ticket revenue we take in. What else can we do to bring in revenue? The cool thing about Festival Park we have a lot of different opportunities to look at for generating other sources of revenue. And we’ve come up with three areas that we’ve focused on. One is the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts programming, the overnights. That’s something we’ve done for about a year and a half, and if you look at all my clutter, you’ll see our patch — the Girl Scout patch. And not to be neglected we are working on developing a Boy Scout patch. The other is weddings. They say the Outer Banks is — what? — fourth for wedding destinations?
They say that. Third or fourth. I’ve yet to see it officially corroborated but it’s huge, that’s for sure.
I’ve been here 3 years and I would never have thought we’d do weddings. I don’t know why. But we are doing it. And we’re only into our second year of that. And the first one we did was on the ship last year. After they said, “I do” the gun went off [laughs].
And then the concerts.
And then the concerts, absolutely. One of things when I heard when I came here was we need to do more out on that space. And so one of the things we’ve done is redouble our efforts to get concerts out there. So we’re kind of planting the seeds this summer. I think after the summer — in all those areas — we’ll get an opportunity to look back on whatever lessons we learn and say: “What can we do better?” I think for our space back there, our big opportunity is rental income. A lot of people, it never fails, when I give a tour of this site and take them back to that space, they’ll go, “This is what you can do out here!” It’s like those old movies when you see Judy Garland and Mickey Rooney, and Mickey says to Judy, “Hey! Let’s get on Broadway!” And, boom, they’re on Broadway. But people need to know, “Here’s the steps to get there.” My original vision was we would do a Roanoke Island Festival Park concert series. But at the same time the reality of our budget cuts is coming. And it’s like, “Is it a wise decision to invest thousands of dollars into bands?” Because the band gets paid whether they sell one ticket or 1000 tickets. One of the cool things about renting the facility for us, is that helps us in that we’re not having to put the large amounts of money that you do when you bring in a band. And what’s in the rider, whether it’s catering or security or those kinds of things. Because there’s risk and then there’s calculated risk.
And not to mislead, I know they had done concerts here in the past. And one of the things we’re looking at here at the park, in all areas, is what can we do more of? The old adage is there’s more than one way to skin a cat. And in my mind, yes it’s concerts, and we’re trying to promote to the promoters. Because one of the things we see in routing with the bands — Straight No Chaser is a perfect example. That’s a group that learned about some of our ads we’re doing for promoters, they saw it and said, “It’s a beautiful site,” and they were appearing somewhere before us and it fit into their routing. Or Cory [Hemilright], who brings in the Bluegrass Festival. Or Blues Traveler, it’s a great opportunity for Brew Thru, a local person who wants to do concerts and also help promote his business. And what a great marriage to be able to do that. So doing that and not just getting stuck on that. Also saying, “If you want to have a wedding, we can do that, too.”
We just at the end of the day really want to maintain our visitor experience. And it sounds corny to say that. But everyone wears more hats than one, which is no different than what anybody else does, but Tanya [Young], she does our marketing and promotions and she also is the person that helps sell our wedding packages. I’ve got my operations manager, that if we’re shorthanded on ticket sales, he goes down and helps sells tickets. Our maintenance staff, when we have events they’re part of that as well. So we’re all trying to do more with less, but at the same time not only have the same visitor experience, but enhance it. I’m anxious to sit down at the end of the season and say: What are our lessons learned? What can we do better? What shouldn’t we do? What should we work toward? And be able to do it with in the scope of our capacity.
So when you say renting a space, it’s to a promoter – or whoever – but you say, “We have a venue, and it does this.” And let them handle the logistics…
Of everything.
You’re in the business or running a park; they’re in the business of holding concerts.
Exactly. But we’ve also found that brides like our stage. Because we’re still kind of learning what it is that brides and grooms and families are interested in. And it so happens that since we have lighting out there anyway we can offer a lighting package and it’s right on the sound. But we also have the space here, the art gallery, and the grand mall space and then we have this outdoor space. So that’s something else that we’re working on. And we’re starting to get that the weddings are like a show. [laughs] Because it is the lighting and the sound, and I think we’re lucky to have that as an add-on out there. I get it, people like concerts, they want concerts and we’re working toward that. But it’s not all we do out there. And one of the cool things about the weddings we’ve discovered that I didn’t anticipate – particularly if it’s a local family — is it’s a way for them to connect with us in a different way. And so maybe the fundraising opportunity besides providing us with funds that we need is a way for people to connect with us in a more personal way.
It’s interesting, because now I think of all three areas – and even the education part – as sales opportunities. Even our scouting is an opportunity to meet two missions: one, it’s great to be involved with the Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts because they’re great operations. But I also think that we’ve got a great product. That we’re able to provide them overnights and do work with their camp leaders with more specific programming that we can do here. So, one of the things the state is encouraging everything to be more entrepreneurial. And I think that’s an opportunity for us to do that. But when I say that, I also say — and I probably say it too much — is that I just don’t want people to forget our core mission and our educational assets. The things that have always been here that I think are great assets and I think are the heart and soul of what the park is. Whether it’s just tourists coming or school groups that are here. Or even we’re finding more of the senior tours that are coming here. And I don’t want people to forget that because I think it’s really important piece of who we are. And I hope it always be the center of what we are.
Well, obviously, educational outreach is what started it all.
The first English speaking America is here. And when I’ve had to go speak to legislators, I remind them. I say, “This is your history. And this was 22 years before Jamestown.”
I don’t think Jamestown would be in this situation. And I don’t know what their funding situation is, but I doubt the Governor of Virginia would say “Let’s defund Jamestown.” And I doubt there’d be the same lack of concern.
Well, remember: the first proposed cuts came from the previous administration. But if you were going to compare us to something — if you would look at all the cultural assets under cultural resources — I think the museum of history is a really great place, but they don’t charge an admission fee. They charge an admission fee if they have a special exhibit. We’re responsible for our own maintenance here. If we were located in downtown Raleigh, the department administration would be responsible for our maintenance. So, you know, everyone’s got their own standard they’re set against. And we’re being held to a different standard. And it’s not just us. It’s other places. But that’s something a lot of people don’t understand as far as what we get versus what someone else gets.
But at the end of the day I have to decide, “What do you spend your time on?” And right now, we’re looking at something we haven’t done a lot of here, but something we certainly will have to do — and that’s fundraising. Getting those people who are interested in helping our facility and finding ways to do that. That’s something I’ve just started to work on and outline. It isn’t anything I’ve even promoted yet. But hopefully I’ll come up with a nice package and you’ll see what I’m talking about. And it’s not new and sexy; but we’ve got planks on our boardwalk people can buy. And we’ve got gardens people can support. And benches. So just looking at other opportunities where we can bring I money.
So, really it’s like any business: how do we do more with less? What are you going to do to increase revenue? And how are you going to trim the fat? And one thing we knew we could do was increase the ticket price. We increased the ticket price from $8 to $10 two years ago. And you do always worry about will you eliminate people. But we felt like after 10 years or so, to increase the price was fair.
I think one of the things we had to do in the beginning when we got our budget cut was to look at things we were doing for free. For instance, in the art gallery they used to have nine months of art shows. It was all free. There was no charge. And if they sold an item, I think the non-profit got a small percentage of the sale. So we had to sit back and say, “Okay, what do we want to do with that space?” And we realized it was an opportunity for a rental space. So now we have three of the shows that we felt were the closest to the community, which was the Mollie Fearing Show, the Dare Co. School Show, and then the quilt show. For a couple of years, we managed the maritime museum in downtown Manteo, but we just weren’t able to staff something off campus and then staff stuff here. So now the town manages that. And I haven’t rehired any permanent staff in over a year. So, we hire what the state calls temp — it’s seasonal help. So we can hire seasonal help in the summer, but at this point we’re just not hiring anymore permanent staff until we feel strong in our plan and we feel stabilized.
And you know, let me say this – hear this Mr. Recorder! – I think the staff has stepped up to the challenge. If it’s weddings we have to do, let’s embrace the weddings. If some services we used to contract – like the grass is something we used to contract, now we buy the piece of machinery and do it ourselves. When you have a 27-acre site, there’s lot of things happening. As we speak right now, they’re happening everywhere. And I credit them for having the attitude of “Okay, we’re going to do what it takes because we support what we do here.” We know we’re already doing great things. that’s the other thing, we’re building on a great foundations and we just hope t make it stronger.
Having said all that, I certainly think we’re appropriation-worthy. This is a state site, the facility itself has been here about 16 years, the ship — the Elizabeth II — will turn 30 on November 22 of this year. And we feel like we’ve been good stewards of the state funds and really keeping up a nice place for our locals and for visitors how come here. I’m hoping that the 30th anniversary of the ship is something — we’re going to be doing a small exhibit in the history center for two months about the ship. And our adventure museum will probably upgrade at eh same time. So hopefully we can think of some event for the locals to come and be reintroduced to who we are. Having said that, I think we have an impact. When groups come they stay in places, they eat food, they get gas, so I think we have an impact on the community that a lot of the business people are probably aware of because they an opportunity to see it. Particularly when those big busses are rolling around. So I do feel like we do try to help support the community in that way and I hope people can feel that impact.
Because you guys have to have a ton of school kids come through?
We get a lot of kids. And I’ll send you a map we show the legislators, because it I think get wrapped up in, “Oh this is just local.” And nothing wrong with being local but to say that kind of diminishes what we do. Because you can look at a legislator and say, “Guess what? A school just came from your district because the history we’re promoting is relevant to where you are.” We’ve had school groups from South Carolina come. We had the Director of Cultural Resources here, and she’s from Salisbury, and the school group on the ship was from Salisbury. And she said, “I didn’t realize!” And a lot of parents are starting to fund these trips because the schools funds are being cut.
PTOs and PTAs are picking up a lot of the weight. And not just here.
And Dare County is surrounded by a lot of poorer counties. So I hope all those tour busses and the people coming in their station wagons are helping those communities. They’re stopping to get something to eat or get gas or shop or whatever. And I’m not just speaking about Roanoke Island Festival Park. I’m speaking of any place, that anybody comes to, even if it’s just to sit their butts on the beach all week and get a sunburn, it impacts those communities around us. I want those legislators to know that.
But it’s like anything, one man’s investment is another man’s waste. And it’s interesting how easy it is to find money in a budget when it benefits your interests.
And it totally gets down to our priorities. And when I say our priorities I mean our legislators and our governor. But I give a lot of credit to all the people who run small businesses here – restaurants, hotels – it’s a very tough business. And I find on a personal level, this is not scientific, but even people who haven’t been impacted by the economy are afraid they will be. And so, when they’re making decisions, whether it’s go out to a movie, or rent a movie or to just watch TV — I get it. People are making their owns decisions about what’s important to them. So when they’re hearing about other people wanting $1.5 million. And some are thinking, “ I think it should be spent doing this,” I certainly hope other are thinking, “I hope those folks get some appropriations so they can grow those other areas. “ But I get that it’s a tough economy. My first office on the Outer Banks was right next to the Food Bank. And the people walking in there look just like me. And it was really a humbling great lesson. And these are people who are working. They have jobs. They’re making an income and just trying t make ends meet. And that’s a tough thing to do. So the last thing I want people to think is that we don’t understand these are tough times.
So knowing that you’re doing all this, do you resent some people’s beliefs that the park is wasting money? You always hear about ‘government waste’ and this image of buckets of money raining down and the people receiving it just burn through it and don’t’ care. So maybe not resent, but do you take issue with the concept that because getting this money from the states, you’re somehow treating it with the respect it deserves?
I just have the benefit of seeing the impact we have on people. And I’ll focus particularly on the school groups we have come here. I feel like we’re enhancing their experience. Look: it’s a tough economy, and it’s a great country. And people can say this is not a worthy way to spend the funds, I just have the opportunity to see the impact we do have here, on a lot of layers. It’s not just on the groups that come that I hope walk away with – number one — a fun educational experience. But I also think the impact we have on the community. I think we’re very fortunate on this little island. We’ve got Festival Park, we’ve got the Lost Colony, we’ve got the Gardens, we’ve got the Aquarium — then we have Jockey’s Ridge, Wright Brothers, an abundance of lighthouses. But, at the end of the day, for me, it is about the people. It’s about the people telling those stories. It’s about the maintenance folks who maintain the site and the ship. It’s about the admin people who keep it all running. There’s a lot of moving parts to this place. And having said that, we’re certainly mindful. The upgrade to the adventure museum, that won’t have costumed interpreters; it can be a self-guided experience. Even American Indian town, we may have staff there to answer questions but it’s developed to be a self-guided experience. And I think you’ll find that more and more as new museums develop that it becomes more of an electronic experience. You’ll walk around with your smart phone and your headphones and you’re hearing that.
Do you fear it will go backwards in terms of interpretive stuff? How bad is it: is it like geez, we need to let the blacksmith go? And maybe the flat screen with the headphones will replace the guy with the accent?
I think we should strive to do both. I think that the interpretive experience with the costume interpreter is a very beneficial one. But having said, that, our American Indian town and adventure museum are both experiences where you will have a person there, but you don’t have five or six costume people there. So I think you balance that. And hopefully that hands on experience is a different hands-on experience. Maybe what you’re touching is a touch screen. But we always need to have people on site to help guide people through.
So how does the financial stuff work. I know form looking on line, there’s an endowment. There was four-year plan . . .
There’s a five-year plan. We engaged a consultant because the state required we do it. And we have a Friends group who has funds also. But when we did our plan —and I’m using a term or consultant used — we came up with our three-legged stool: so we would go into our funds, then Friends of Elizabeth II — our 5013c would help us – and then the state. The way the consultant did the plan was with the $1.5 that we thought we were going to get. And the state, it’s a two-year budget. And next year is what they call a short, but if they wanted to, if they gave us money, we would hope they’d keep it there for two years. Generally speaking it’s for a two-year period of time.
So if they gave you $450,000 this year, they’d give it to you next year. That’s what you’re hoping for.
Yes.
But that’s still a million less than what you’re used to getting,
Yes. We were supposed to get $1.5 million. And I’ll send you that report. It’s a lot of pages. But I’ll separate it out so you can get an overall feel. And that plan was set forth by our consultant and a task force formed to help write this report. And this firm was the lead, and it included some commission members, myself and the chair of our Friends group. And just kind of sitting around talking about, you know, how do we move forward? And what are things we ca n do? You know what we really want to have is kind of breathing room to grow. I’ve spent a lot of my time in the past three years just dealing with budgets and reports and things. And I think sometimes what gets lost in the message, is the —which clearly are important to people, and it’s important to people because it’s taxpayer money and they care how it’s spent and I totally get that. But it would be great to have time to just be creative and help grow our scouting program and existing programs and just look for other ways we can market to a very modern generation of people that are not just the 20-sometigns, but a generation of people who are used to being electronic. But however we end up, we really want to be able to provide a strong report to say, “Here is how we found these other sources of revenue; here’s how we strengthened our existing programming.” And we may even have to report on, “Here’s some things we tried but didn’t work, but we appreciate the opportunity to try them and see if they fit our site.”
I saw where that report estimated the park generated $6-7 million for the town. Is part of your argument to say, ‘Look what we do?” And is it salient? Are people buying it?
Look: it’s a tough economy. And I certainly wouldn’t want anyone to feel bad for Roanoke Island Festival Park because we have a lot of people who are out there trying hard to make a living. Look at our fishermen and women And people can say this is not a worthy way to spend the funds. But we also have 27 public acres and a boardwalk to maintain — I think of us as the Central Park of Manteo — and there’s no ticket fee for that. And we’re committed to doing it in the most efficient way possible. But, having said that, I think the state supporting educational opportunities and preserving our history is worthy. And I’d like to think that no matter how tight our belts get, that we always have room to learn about our history and our culture. And we’re committed to doing it in the most efficient way possible. I don’t know how to address what other people think. We certainly are trying to be a lean, mean, festival park machine. [laughs] We get it: tighten your belt. To me, personally, people have been very supportive and positive. But I can pretty much be anywhere, whether it’s out to eat or at the store, or walking to my car. And they usually say [wags her finger], “ Let me tell you what you need to do!” Then it’s usually what I call, scathingly brilliant ideas.
What do you hear mostly? And are they viable?
It’s always something that – you know, to me I feel like we do something pretty unique. And not that we don’t have people that are interpreting the story of the colonists in different ways on the island, I get that. But I think you really can’t be all things to all people. So for me it all starts with what we do at the core, which interpreting the history in the park, and the other stuff — which is the concerts, which is the weddings, which is the scouting — is also part of what we are. But, hopefully down the road, it will help support us in a stronger financially way. But you’ve got to focus on your game and what you’re doing.
The concert thing is what I hear most of. I hear a) it’s sitting her not doing any good. And b), it’s a great venue. You don’t have to convince people what a great place it would be for any band. Everyone can see their favorite band playing there to some degree or another. What are the speed bumps? Is it the parking? Is it getting the town to come around?
It’s hard for me to speak about 10 years ago. For me, it’s been about finding that good fit. Promoting to the promoters, so they say, “This a great venue. And we’re willing to put out the funds to bring the band here.” And we do have parking, but if they have to bring in a bus from someplace else. I just see it as all good. And whether you come to see the bluegrass festival, or whether you come to see Straight No Chaser or to see Blues Traveler, I will have to say it’s a great experience to be out there on the lawn with your blanket and your chair and great music. It just is. For us, we know we need to do what is going to help us generate income. And so, that’s why I think for me it’s about selling the promoters. That the promoters get this is a great place. And when they’re looking at their routing, they’re coming here. And us getting to them. So now we’re promoting to them through some avenues we have. We know what they’re looking at when they’re looking at sites, and so now we’re starting to do that. And I think this summer, I’m really interested to sit back in September and say, “What are the fruits of our labor?” You know, Live Nation is bringing Straight No Chaser here. If you have someone like that, do they look and say “Great. We want to come back.”
The rumor mill was hot and heavy about Widespread Panic. And the way I heard it —and tell me if this wrong – but apparently, they wanted $60,000 for two days and y’all said no. And people were tripping because Widespread is one of one of those bands where you’re not worried about people coming from the beach because it’s a band that generates its own audience. Why did that fall through?
They were interested in coming here, and at the end of the day they took a different gig over us. But I think they are still interested. They like the venue. And it may be something that my still happen.
But it’s not like y’all said, ‘No.’
No. [laughs] We spent a lot of time on Widespread Panic. But having said that, I will have to say it was a lot of money to put out to get them here. And we worked toward getting someone else coming in to help defray those costs. But at the end of the day what happened is they took another gig and said, “We really like the venue, we really like the place and let’s talk again, because we’re interested incoming there.”
The other thing that was chucked out there was that maybe Manteo was too conservative and didn’t like the idea of a bunch of hippies running around.
It’s funny that you’re talking about it because we really — if you want to keep a secret, I’m your girl — and for my part, we really didn’t talk about it a lot. But it was several months of discussion and so we really got to a point where we were including our Friends in it as well because we would’ve had to make some decisions about whether we should dedicate funds to do it. Which is a tough thing to do. And when you’re talking about your funds being short and how you utilize them, it’s a big decision. And finally it got down to there’s this other gig and they decided to take that one. And we left it with, “We’d love to talk again.” And they said, “We love your venue.” And I think they’re the kind of group that is at the point where some of their interest is in playing places they’d never played before. And they checked out accommodations.
Well, it’s not a bad place to spend a week on the beach.
Well, let me ask your opinion, because if they circle back around I’d be curious to see what you think: do you think we could do two or three days?
They do multiple concerts in a lot of places. I think there’s potential for having a couple of bands play a couple of days — like the bluegrass festival. I also think there’s ways to tie into the local clubs and do sort of a mini SXSW. Have some headliners here, and also have people paying the Duck Amphitheatre — or the clubs. But there’s a lot of musicians here and a lot of connected people, and getting people to come to the beach isn’t a hard sell. Especially in the fall when the water’s warm. But you could start it small with a couple bands and grow.
I’m hoping that this summer we’ll have success. But I think this summer is our first pass at planting some seeds and seeing how it goes on a lot of levels: we hope the promoters say, “That’s cool we want it.” We hope that the visitor, whether it’s a local person or someone who comes to a concert says we need to start looking at festival park for more concerts. That that starts to happen and build in layers. But it’s funny you brought up Widespread Panic, because I hadn’t thought about them in so long.
Conversely, how much of an anchor on the budget is the pavilion when it’s not being used? Does it cost money every year?
It costs money to maintain the grounds and equipment. The stage was added to before my time, but not too may years ago. And think what would probably happen if were doing a lot of concerts out there it’d be an opportunity to maybe upgraded some of the equipment. I think it’s fine where it now. But a lot of bands bring their own everything anyway. If you want the numbers I can get them to you.
I’m just trying to get a sense of how big of a drain it is. If it cost a million each year to maintain then maybe there’d be an argument for cutting it loose.
No. It does cost money in terms of maintaining that facility, cutting the grass and maintaining the equipment, we do that. I guess some special equipment or something we have to do we may have to bring someone in.
I heard if Blue Traveler goes well enough, Brew Thru might do six next year.
We’ve already held dates for them just in case. And the interesting thing with the concerts is a lot of time people want to book the weekend. And we try to tell them, it’s the crossover days. And for us at the park, it’s the least attendance we have because people are checking in and out of the cottages.
That’s also when the weddings are, so it seems like you could do weddings on weekends and leave concerts for midweek.
That’s right. Because we had two big weddings the past two Saturdays, and we encourage concerts on Wednesday and Thursdays. And we’re talking about flying the banners over the beach, because as many times as it happens, people look up.
So was that part of the logic of bringing Fisher Essenfeld aboard. He obviously has a background in the field. Didn’t he used to work with Blues Traveler?
Yeah, when our position opened up, we had someone who did a great job — and not that there weren’t people who didn’t rent the facility for concerts — but I kind of sat back and thought: what are we looking for? And having done some event work myself, one option I considered was contracting it out. Like we have university performances here. UNC just performed here. We do those in our smaller, 240-seat film theatre. And we also have a 50-seat auditorium. But at the same time, the understanding was we were transitioning to the next level. It’s not just for a little while, this what we’re moving to be. So I really was thinking maybe I’d hire someone to do that kind of booking and then contract the other. Then when I did the interviews it was interesting to find someone who worked in the concert world, and that’s been beneficial. To have someone who speaks their language.
But I have to tell you I‘m really happy about our lineup this summer. So I think we’re planting seeds. But if we can find some successes, and if Brew Thru gets what they want out of it — which I think is to make some money but also the added bonus of the additional marketing — then if that’s a success I think they will do more concerts. I think if Live Nation feels successful they’ll do more concerts. I think what we’ll find out real quickly. At the end of the day, peoples’ definition of success is am I making any money on this. So I think this summer is great opportunity to see and learn some lessons.
Long term, what has the most revenue? The concerts?
I think that remains to be seen. Don’t let me mislead you: last year we did two weddings. This year, we have eight and Tanya’s already booking for 2014. I don’t have the answer to how much that grows. Of course, the one that’s the most fun and feels like the best fit for us is scouting, but they can only do so much with their overnights. And it was interesting, we had an issue a couple of months ago where they wanted to do something out there, and someone wanted a wedding and then we were talking about a concert. And I’m like, “Okay, who asked first?” but that’s cool. That’s the kind of problem we want to have. But anything we can do to fully utilize our park and our acreage is best for us. And clearly this a region that wants concerts. And another thing I’m going to be interested in besides many people attend the concerts is where are they from? Are they locals? Are they out-of-towners? Or is it a balance of both?
So what is this Dare To Discover thing? Is it a coup? Because it sounds like they want to take over the operations, but they aren’t very detailed.
I can tell you there was a public information request made that said it was for someone’s father who was interested in the park. And then I was notified that someone had turned in a proposal. But we don’t own the property. The state does. It’s something that came out of left field. I don’t know who’s on his board. I only know he works for the county and that’s because he picked up his information request in a county car [laughs].
Well, their site doesn’t have much info. It says they want to do a public private partnership and they want to do more cabin rentals. And it says the lead’s name is James Wooten. But it doesn’t say who is on his board or any real details. So I was wondering if you knew more.
I’ve just seen what everyone else has seen. But I’m being very honest — and maybe I shouldn’t be saying this at all —but a request was made and we provided it. And the woman who requested it said that it was for her dad. And then this guy, who I later found out was Mr. Wooten, came and picked it up. And I happened to look out the window and saw he left in a county car. And I actually called the county and said, “If want information, you don’t have to send someone over…” and they said, “We don’t know what you’re talking about.” And then when the Voice started doing stuff online he started putting stuff out there.
So there hasn’t been any dialogue? He’s never sat down and said, “This is what I want to do.”
No. He asked to be on the agenda of the commission once. And the agenda was already set and we were working on our budget and plan. So he asked if he could come to a meeting and I said, “Sure our meetings are public. See you there.” But he didn’t show up.
Have you considered any of those ideas?
To me, it seems like there’s campgrounds already here, so I don’t know that building a campground would be beneficial or that having camp shells would make sense for weddings and concerts. And when we have scouting groups, they bring their own tents and stuff. But there is a 4H camp —I think it’s in Hyde County —that has similar things. But for us, what we’re doing, I don’t think that would work into our plan.
As a state business do you feel weird about competing with the other businesses?
I think at the end of the day the consumer benefits because they just have other options. Another thing with weddings for us, which is cool, is it’s another opportunity for a wedding planner or florist to pick up some more business. But you’re out there in the world, you’re writing about this stuff — everybody’s doing weddings, everybody’s doing concerts. [laughs] You’ve got Duck, downtown Manteo — a lot of people are doing concerts, and a lot of them are doing it for free. So, for me, every day your choice is I can choose to spend my day wondering what other people are doing or I can chose to spend my day on, “Here’s our game plan; here’s what we’re doing.” But it’s an interesting time when municipalities are offering events and concerts for free. And it’s just the way it is. And the municipalities probably have more money to do things like that. And I’m sure they do it to benefit the business in their community, the restaurants, the craft shops. So a lot of us are doing the same things. It’s just how we choose to do them or the setting that’s different. So maybe the victor is that local person who wants a unique experience or that visitor who has a lot of options to choose from when he gets here. So if you’re going to be charging for something, that just encourages you to make it a much more special experience. And that just makes our core mission more unique.
Because you’re funding a noble purpose.
Yeah.
What about Windmill Point. Have y’all talked at all? Is that a future competitor? Or is there hope or maybe some collusion, if you ever did do a major event with multiple sites?
Look, if they ever wanted to do some of the seafood festival over here? That would be great. I’d be open to that. When the whole thing first started I did call Lee [Nettles, Director of the Visitors Bureau], just to cut through everything and find out what’s real. And I said, “What are your plans?” And I guess they’re working on their second study. I don’t now what ultimately what they’re going to be, so again: we need to be focused on us. But at the end of the day, I hope it’s something that will benefit everybody. I don’t know what the split is between Nags Head and the Visitors Bureau. And you tell me: is Kill Devil Hills trying to do something to?
I can’t say. They’re looking at that Baum Tract and a pavilion is on the list of possibilities. Not sure what that means, but it seems like if one thing goes well in this county, someone else tries to do it. I think that’s a byproduct of seven towns. But our shoulder season, you can’t do everything anymore. So it would be nice to see some sense of unified direction.
I know when we try to schedule anything, not weddings, but the concerts, we try to look at a calendar and avoid other events. But it’s hard because there’s so much happening and so much going on. For me, again, if were to pull up an event calendar for this weekend, you’ve got municipalities who are in the entertainment business or the bars and restaurants —which you expect them to do that, I’m not saying they shouldn’t — but for me, this is my stuff, so I say, “This what we’re doing. This is what we do best.” But if someone planned something and wanted to have a satellite event her, we’d certainly be open to it. I think that’d be great.
Hopefully there’s some collusion. I saw quotes where Lee came to your defense with letters to the governor.
The chamber has been very supportive. The town has been supportive and really said they fell like we really help their economy. And I think the Visitor’s Bureau is in a tough spot. They have a lot of people they have to help. And if Kill Devil Hills does do something, I’m sure they’ll go the Visitors Bureau and ask for money, too [laughs].
Everybody does. If it’s tourism-related, people ask.
When I came here, to be honest, there was twice the bureau asked us for money. They used to sponsor the symphony solely. It was their gift the community and they would have it here at the park. And a year ago they decide not t do it. But for two years, they requested funds to go half-and-half. And at the time we were able to do that. So, we have a nice visitors bureau and they have a lot to promote and support and I think we’re certainly one of them.
What’s the best-case scenario? Worst-case scenario? Do these revenue streams have potential to support the park? And is there a case where they’d shutter the whole thing?
Well, it’s certainly not how I plan my day. I’m just not in the mindset of focusing on closing down. My focus is how we grow. That’s my focus. That’s where I am. If that changes, then we have to look at things differently. But that’s not where I am right now. And that’s not where the park is. As you can see all the things going on here – we’re certainly not acting like a group that’s getting ready to close the doors. So that’s not in my mindset.
Having said, that, realistically, you have to look and see where is this money coming from? Or are there ways we can do things more effectively. You always have to be in that mindset, eyes open, no blinders on. For me in the short term, it’s seeing where we end up with appropriations and using our existing funds that we have and really look at those areas. And use that as a growth period: are there more and different things we can do in marketing? Let’s investigate that. Do we agree and find that the concert area is an opportunity for increased income, let’s do that. I’m really hoping the upgrades we do for the adventure museum create a newer experience for people coming to the park. One my goals is to have a space here that is for traveling exhibits, because I think that allows for a new experience in that history/educational location. I think something like that helps are community get connected — you have an opening night for locals to come see us and support us. Because while we do have locals who come use the park, generally speaking I think we see more visitors.
So whoever party is, and who ever the legislators are — because, remember, our cuts started with the previous administration — we’re going to have to be able to tell our story and say here’s what we do well and here’s what we need form you. Or here’s what we do well, and we’ve done it well enough we’re not sure we need nay help. I think we’ll always be in a place where we need an appropriation. Having said, that, as long as this is state property, I think it’s appropriate we should have something. I just hope five years from now that we are known as a really great historical attraction that also has great concerts and is also a great wedding venue and is also great for scouts. As opposed to, here’s a great concert place, and by the way it’s also a historical attraction.
______________________________________________________________________________________
LEADING BY EXAMPLE
How a non-profit project with outside perspective hopes to bring investment and optimism to Hatteras Village
This story starts in Duck. That’s where Charlottesville, Virginia, entrepreneur Eric Kaplan and his wife first vacationed 28 years ago. When that got too developed for their tastes, the couple shifted north to Corolla. When that boomed, they bolted for Avon and Buxton — right about the time the beach access battles were heating up. But Kaplan didn’t pay much attention to the bumper stickers and protest signs. At least not at first.
“We always just went to the beach and ate seafood and enjoyed ourselves,” says the semi-retired founder of Frontline Test Equipment, which makes troubleshooting software for Bluetooth devices. “But once I bought my home in Frisco in 2010, I decided I needed to find out more about the community. So I went on a quest to understand those issues.”
Kaplan went so far as to visit the HQs of different organizations involved in the lawsuits. The more he learned, the more he saw a frustrated community that needed help in the face of adversity; he also saw a beach destination that still had a big future. So much that he’s guaranteed $2 million of his own money to start a not-for-profit, 501(c) 3 called Hatteras Island Ocean Center, Inc. The goal is to build, fund and operate two cultural attractions in Hatteras Village: a public fishing pier/education site/event venue (sort of a mini-Jennette’s) that’s still in the fundraising stage; and a combo of interactive nature exhibits and soundside paddle access that will open this June under the name Ocean Center Ecology Park.
Along the way, Kaplan secured help from local fixtures such as wildlife specialist Lou Browning and former tourism board chair, Tim Midgett, as well as fellow part-time residents like DC native Richard Henneberry, who spent his winter framing walls and giving financial advice. Their hope is to give people more reasons to spend time in Hatteras Village and educate them about the island’s surroundings and heritage, while providing anchor points for local businesses to cater to those visitors. Yet, they still face some resistance. Some are off-island homeowners who worry about extra people ruining their vacations; others are natives who can’t believe there’s no catch. After all: why would a bunch of fresh arrivals spend all this money and energy without expecting something in return?
“I do expect something back,” Kaplan replies. “I expect to be paid back, eventually. I also expect other non-resident homeowners to join the effort. Because with just a little imagination and investment, this place could be amazing.”
We sat down with board members Kaplan, Henneberry and Midgett to discuss their vision — and share in their optimism. What follows is the full transcript of that discussion. — Matt Walker
Let’s start by the three of you giving me an idea of what the project is about and what got you involved.
Tim Midgett: My part was really easy. Eric got me involved. It’s hard to say no to him.
Eric Kaplan: I got Tim involved because this is a project where a lot of local knowledge is needed. People who know the community and are important in the community. And I figured on Hatteras Island, start by going and talking to the Midgett family. So I went into Midgett Realty and stalked Tim for a while. And eventually, met up with him. And we hit it off right away. He likes the project and I like him. It’s great. We’re working really well together. It’s been a fantastic resource for the project. Anytime we need anything — from who to hire for an accountant to renting a lift — he knows everyone. It’s great.
Rich Henneberry: The first time Eric talked to me, I was playing Frisbee with a friend of mine on the beach. And I said, “No. You’re crazy. This is the craziest project, I’ve ever heard.” The second time he got me on the beach, I was playing Frisbee with another friend. I started warming up to the idea of doing some economic development here. Trying to get this place up and moving. And, like Tim says, he’s hard to say no to.
Eric Kaplan: Really? My wife has no problem with that.
So, Eric. you’re obviously ground zero. What’s your vision? And what inspired you?
Eric: The reason is I sold a business a number of years back and I’m kind of semi-retired. Although this project kind of changed that. I feel like I’ve been working harder now than when I was running a for-profit business. In Charlottesville, my wife and I started a not-for-profit school, a 501 (C) 3. And it’s been wonderful. It’s been a gift to the community. It’s been great. And it’s been going for 20 years. And coming down here I just feel like: I’m in this community, I need to do something to help it. And I see a void here because so many homes are owned by non-residents. And I’m a big believer in leading by example. My idea was, let’s start something down here and lets’ get folks to join in. And that’s why I’m in, hook, line and sinker.
This particular project, I saw a void in the fact that Frisco Pier was in disrepair. I tried to reach out to the owners to see if there was a way we could work with them. They were not interested. And so I said, If they’re not interested, what can be done? And I came up with the idea of doing another pier. And that really got reinforced when I met the AP Biology teacher at Cape Hatteras a few years back. And she said, “You know, I’m teaching Marine Biology but I don’t have ocean access for my kids.” And that’s when it kind of clicked for me: a fishing pier with research education. I’ve got a strong background in education. I’m not an educator but both my parents were teachers, my wife’s a teacher, and she started and ran the school. So economic development and education are the two main themes of the project. Then, while we were focused on the pier side, I was looking down the street and I saw this amazing wetland area. I said, “Wow. We can have ocean access and sound access, all in a few hundred yards of each other.” And we can protect the sound side and essentially turn it into a park. And everything just kind of came together. And that’s really the genesis of the whole thing.
And then you said, “I need some sort of ambassador into the community.” That’s when you started talking to Tim.
Eric: Absolutely.
So what intrigued you about, it Tim? You said he’s a hard guy to say no to, but there’s got to be something else. [Ed. Note: at this point, a plumber arrives so Eric gets up to talk to them.]
Tim: It was kind of unique circumstances at the time. It was post-Irene. I’d been spending most of my time in Rodanthe. Our offices were essentially shut down. We had no personnel there. And Eric kept leaving messages for me. And I didn’t know the man to be honest with you. I didn’t know what he was about. I didn’t know anything. But he was persistent. Whenever I showed up in Hatteras there were messages there. And he kept persisting. And you can’t keep saying no when you don’t know what it’s about to begin with. You certainly have to give someone the opportunity to explain themselves. And once I talked with Eric, I pretty much immediately saw that this man means business and that it’s a tremendous project from the get-go. I think had I known where he was headed and just how determined he is, I might have said no. [laughs] Because he doesn’t let grass grow under anybody’s feet. If you’re involved, you’re involved. He knows where people’s strengths and weaknesses are, and who to call and when, and he makes it happen.
In terms of why I was interested, I was born and raised here. And we’ve taken our lumps and bruises here recently, with Mother Nature and things like that. And road access, of course is a huge concern for us. This was just a feel good project from the get go. And I think coastal-type tourism is something we need more of. And, yes, we’ve got lighthouses and a world of national parks around us and things like that. But we really don’t have things that are interaction-type things. People can go out and enjoy Mother Nature, enjoy the surf, enjoy the sound, enjoy the beach. But in a lot of ways, this project provides access to those resources that really is not available right now. We do have people can go park a vehicle and walk over to the beach, but they don’t understand why the shells are there, why the fish are there, why the tide’s coming and going. They don’t understand the background. So in my mind, this potentially a coastal attraction that can open up another world to people to some of the nature that created Hatteras and brought them her to begin with.
And Rich, you’ve been coming here for years. And it sounds like you sort of have a giving streak by nature.
Rich: I didn’t have a giving streak all my life. Eighteen years of corporate finance and consulting pretty much burned me out. I got out of that racket and decided I needed to do something else. I’ve dedicated most of my life now to all volunteer work. And I have three passions. I have music; I have ecology and the environment, which is what’s going on down here. And I have veterans issues. If I’m gong to devote my time to an organization, I need to feel passionate about it. And this project tied right in one of those three things.
I don’t know if you’re aware of this. But environmentalism has become kind of a dirty word in the past 10 years.
Tim: It’s sad, but it really has.
You say that word in a Dare County meeting, and people automatically turn off or lash out. Down here it’s even worse.
Rich:Well, it must be shyness from the camera and the recorder going, because I haven’t used the word “environment” in seven months. [laughs] We actually named this place the ecology center for that very reason so we wouldn’t raise anybody’s ire. But those things are very important to me. But for me it was about the 3 passions, I have, which are ecology, music and veterans issues.
Tim, you’ve, grown up here. I think a big part of that resentment’s over what’s been going in terms of lawsuits and such that people who grow up here are inherently environmentalists. You don’t have to tell someone who spends their lives surrounded by nature that nature is important.
Tim: I would absolutely agree with you. I think for the most part people here are good stewards of the environment and are, in a sense, environmentalists. You say that word has been a bad word recently and I think a lot of it is just — let’s face it — all the various organizations, environmental and otherwise, that are opposing some of what’s going on out here. This is our home, this our livelihood, this is all we know. And I don’t care where you’re from, you don’t want people saying that you shouldn’t be living where you live. And it almost gets that fundamental. And environmental organizations are getting a bad rap perhaps when most of what they do is probably good. And it’s easy for some CEO of an organization to write a letter opposing Oregon Inlet Bridge, but I wonder how much its membership knows the effects these things have on the people who live here. I think there’s a disconnect there. There really is.
Rich: I completely agree with that. It’s really easy for someone who’s not on the island and doesn’t care about the island to say, “We don’t need this bridge. ” And it’s obvious that in the past six months, these people really don’t have a vested interest in this island. And maybe their interest is they just don’t want another domino to fall in the environmental chain, and that’s why they’re fighting this. And that’s really sad. Because you are going to create people who are going to be against environmental causes, just because of some really stupid issues.
Have you heard any backlash down here as far as the project is concerned? I know I’ve seen comments on line where people say, “We don’t need this.”
Rich: I’ve heard minor things. Nothing substantial. Nothing we can really put our teeth into. I’ve seen Facebook comments from when we were doing work with the cold stunned turtles and some people wrote, “We should just eat them.” But they’re just being juvenile. That’s not something someone really means or that has anything to do with the project.
It’s funny you say that. Because walking through the building, you see signs for future displays. There’s one for a commercial fishing; and another for sea turtles. And those don’t always match up.
Tim: That’s true.
So how do you navigate that?
Eric: Well, let’s back up for a second, because there’s an important person who I don’t want to leave out of the story. Lou Browning, who’s an amazing gentleman, was actually one of our original board members. Now he’s on our board of advisors. But when I started this, I knew I needed someone like Tim, for all the reasons we articulated, but I also wanted a scientist involved. And we still go to him full time for advice.
But, Rich is right. We don’t use the word environment. We’re not in the environment park. We’re in the ecology park. And the way we came up with the term ecology is we got together with some of the leaders in our fishing community. And I said, “Here’s what we’re trying to do. How do we do this so we don’t piss people off?” And it was agreed that ecology is a safe word. Because we’re all part of the ecosystem. People are part of the ecosystem. And we try to stay away from that word environment. You won’t find it anywhere in our literature. But ecology has been blessed by the fishing community.
Rich: I used it.
So if there’s backlash, where is it coming from? Eric, you said you get ‘nastygrams’.
Tim: I can only respond in terms of what I’ve heard in the community, which is obviously very, very important. . And most of what I’ve heard has been from individuals — a collective voice — but an individual who feels like that the project in some way infiltrates their back yard. Collective, I’ve heard very little opposition. Let’s face it, this is a feel good project. It’s a huge boon for Hatteras Island. Probably the best thing to come along in a couple of decades. There are some detractors in the community who fail to differentiate this project from the Graveyard of the Atlantic Museum. And I’ve been a board member there for a couple of decades. And it was a long time coming. But much like this, it’s no simple project. It requires a whole lot of knowledge and infrastructure and background. As I see it, today we have a world-class museum. And we have a whole lot of artifacts. and no, they’re not properly displayed, but the displays for that museum are a couple of million dollars. And that museum is no longer a fledgling group of local people either. It’s a part of the state system of museum. So it’s not really the village’s left to finish. But in my mind it’s an overwhelming success. I’ve seen visitation numbers there that exceed other sites up and down the state. But this is a totally separate, independent project. There’s no connection, other than that they’re culturally focused research centers.
Rich: Being a relative newcomer to the island, I see people are a little hesitant to tell you why they’re afraid, one-on-one. When they have strength in numbers, they’ll say, ‘This is a horrible project.” But when you get them and hold their feet to the fire and say, “What’s the problem with the project?” Like last night, they can’t tell you one-on-one what the problem is. And a lot of it is the “We don’t want it in our backyard, it’s going to ruin my view or it’s going to ruin what’s going on here.”
When you look at all these issues, Hatteras is in a state of flux. It’s not a 50s fishing village anymore. And it feels like there’s a trapeze act going on, where people don’t want to let go of this trapeze to grab the next trapeze — or multiple trapezes. Is that that the conflict. Because you hear people who look at the beach access issues and the bridge issues and say “Hatteras is ruined.” But you wouldn’t be investing all this time and energy and millions of dollars to create a non-profit project, if you didn’t see a future the island? So what do you see that other people don’t see?
Eric: And we may be talking about different people, too. It sounds like, you’re saying there’s people on the other side of the bridge and or out of state, saying Hatteras Island is doomed. I don’t know if they think it’s washing away….
I’m actually I’m talking people who live here. I hear more doom and gloom coming from people who live here, saying “It’s not what it used to be to me; it’s not what it should be.” It’s almost like there’s this pall of negativity that emanates. And perhaps rightly so. But is part of the motivation for this project to throw some positivity in the mix?
Eric: The first marketing person I ever hired used to say — and she was a lousy marketing person — but she said one thing that has stuck with me. And it’s very correct. She said, “Change equals loss.” And I think for a lot of people you’re talking about, it’s changing and therefore, we’re losing something. And they don’t even know what they’re losing — they’re probably not even thinking about what they’re gaining — it’s just different. And there’s an awful lot of that on this island, I think.
Tim: Going back to people expressing their frustrations and having doubts about their future. I like to think that’s the result of more recent frustrations. That’s from having — what? October 29, I think it was, Mother Nature paid us another visit. People haven’t had access. They haven’t been able to deal with goods and services they were accustomed to. And I think there is a whole lot of negativity built up. And rightfully so. I think that would happen anywhere. But when it’s all said and done, the vast majority of the people here are very resilient. They’re not going anywhere. This is home. And they love it. And yes, I’ve seen an unsurpassed level of frustration the past several months. And, again I think there’s good reason for it. And I think a lot of it goes back to — for lack of a better word — environmental organizations who are making life miserable. If people knew that bridge was coming, they wouldn’t have that fear they have in terms of the future of the village and the island.
Conversely, I went to a meeting over noise, where the whole island showed up to protect the industries that are — like weddings. And it’s like the island is in flux. And it was good to see the people moving forward and encouraging new industries. So it seems like there’s a transition in place where Hatteras may not be what it was in 1950 — or 1980 — but it can be partially that and partially something else. And this seems to be another step in that direction.
Tim: Yeah. It’s hard to separate the things that are coming into play here. I’ll stand here and say that any person who was in business — or you didn’t really have to be in business. These recent times have affected everyone in some way shape or form. Whether it’s the environmental influences — hurricanes, storms, things like that — or more physical in terms of not having roads and not having access. I just think a lot of is we’ve just had a whole lot of tough circumstances over the past several years. And I think we’ll rise above it. Going back to something you said earlier, harkening back to Isabel when she came through in 2003. That changed Hatteras Island. In many ways, Hatteras Island hasn’t found its identity since then. I think we’re getting there. But let’s face it, if we had 400 hotel rooms before then, now we have 150 in Hatteras Village. That’s the kind of impact it had economically. And now I’ll make a leap forward from 2005 until today — the economic downturn. Everybody’s had to reinvent themselves. Anybody , anywhere, if they say they haven’t faced the thought of having to reinvent themselves, then they’re wrong. Because we’re in a different world. And certainly anyone affiliated with anything that has to do with business, has had to reinvent themselves. But we are in a state of flux. Not just Hatteras Village but all Hatteras Island.
Eric: As far as active hotel rooms – and Tim can speak more to this, being in the rental home business and also owning a hotel – my understanding is that the lack of hotels has made a huge difference. And the reason is this: today’s typical visitor comes and rents a home for a week and brings everything they need. And they’re sort of self-contained. Maybe they stop at Food Lion or whatever. They load up and they spend the majority of time on the beach or whatever they’re doing. And then they come home and they cook a family meal. So there aren’t a lot of people running around in the evenings. When there were more hotel rooms, those people had to go out to eat. And that put people into restaurants. Once they were out in restaurants, there was a nightlife. A guy named Buddy Foster does a great job of explaining what the village was like when he was a kid. And it wasn’t just motel rooms, there was a lot of camping here. So imagine, you’ve had 1000 or more people who would’ve been milling around the village, buying the kids an ice cream, going to the art gallery. That doesn’t happen anymore. People come off the beach, they cook dinner, turn on the TV, turn on the Netflix, and they’re done. No nightlife here anymore. It really has changed the place. Wouldn’t you say, Tim?
Tim: I think that’s absolutely correct.
Rich:That’s what I’ve seen as well.
You mentioned a boardwalk earlier. Is that part of the reasoning of putting the two close together and having the walking distance: to put people outside?
Eric: Our vision is if we can to tie the central village into what we’re doing out here and breath live and activity into this place. That would be fantastic.
Rich: I have friends who rented houses in Hatteras Village. And they said, “We didn’t feel comfortable letting our kids go walk up and down 12.” And I said, you know they’re putting in a sidewalk so kids can walk up and down the sidewalk and play. And they said, “Oh that’s great. We’re gonna come back and rent. Because it’s so quaint and self-contained.” And I think these types of projects are good where we can get a sidewalk or walkway, and some stuff for kids to do — so the kids can say, “Mom! Dad! I’m going to bike up to the pier for the afternoon, give me my fishing pole and 10 bucks for a pier pass.” When I was growing up it was, “Mom give me, two bucks.” Nowadays, it’s $30, because, they’re going to want three hot dogs, and an ice cream cone and a candybar and five sodas, and who knows? [laughs]
So is this much a psychological boost as it is a physical project?
Eric: Yes. I’ve said this before, but — for lack of a better term — I feel like Hatteras Village has lost its mojo. And I’m trying help it get it back. To get its confidence back as a Village, and just get the energy flowing. And we talk about leadership by example, and hopefully when people see us do this they think, “Well, you know what? If they can do this, more things can happen.” You know people talk about downward spirals, but there’s upward spirals, also. And you can change things. You can change things a little at a time. And maybe it’s naïve; and maybe its stupid. But I think we can do it. Just from this project, you’ve met Rich — he can be doing anything in the world, and he’s up here picking up a hammer and nails to put up these walls. That’s pretty special I think. Tim, didn’t tell you the whole story. The whole story is that when we first met, he said, “I’ve been spending the last 5 years trying to get off boards. The last thing I want to do is be on your board. But I think you’re onto to something here. And I’m going to join your board. And I’m going to give you any support that you need.”
Part of the reason we’re talking to you about his project, is there’s always a disconnect between people who live here, and people who visit. But I think there’s an outside perspective can be beneficial. Is that what’s going on here: people coming in and seeing things with eyes and going “Wow!’ this can be something besides what it’s always been?” Is that’s what going on?
Tim: I definitely think that’s a big part of the puzzle. Absolutely. I think these two gentlemen are great examples of someone who did have an outside vision and wanted to come in and do something good for the area. But I’ll go back to the discussion to Rich’s example of this project and the sidewalks and the housing community — this is among the first tangible efforts to go in that direction. But for a couple of decades, those of us that are in the business community and trying to figure out where Hatteras Village was going, we’ve envisioned a series of gift shops and what not. As Rich says, a destination village, as opposed to a pass-thru. Where you can park your car here or next door and traipse back and forth through the village, not unlike Ocracoke. Heretofore, certainly in the last decade since it got messed up by Isabel, Hatteras Village has become a pass-thru village for people en route to Ocracoke.
Eric pointed out that at one point, the sign heading north when you got off the ferry heading north didn’t’ even mention Hatteras Village. It said ’60 miles to Nags Head.’ I’d never noticed that.
Rich: I heard the story that this was the road to Ocracoke. And I was like, that’s crazy. So when I have friends com stay with me in Frisco, I don’t let them go north. I say, “Go to Hatteras Village. Go to Burrus Red and White. Go to the gift shop. Go to Dinky’s. Go to Isabelle’s closet.” Those types of things. I force them south. And it’s really a lot closer, too. You can get to Hatteras Village in 5 minutes from where I live. It’ll take you 15 to get to Buxton. Just go south. Hit those shops. Put some money in their pocket.
The other thing that makes this project different. Eric and talked earlier that a lot of second homeowners just buy a house with out knowing where they bought it. They only see it as a rental machine. And they don’t know the issues they’re taking on. All they knew is their neighbor in DC bought a rental in 2004 and its paying for itself, and they find themselves caught off guard, whether It is the insurance rates spiking or people crossing the yard to check the waves. So I applaud Eric for taking steps to learn about this place, and going and talking to Irene Nolan. I guess what I’m saying is there’s a right way and wrong way to do it. And this message of getting people with second home to treat it as such.
Rich: Well, my wife and I, we made our house down here a home. We don’t rent I out. So we didn’t buy a big house. It’s a small little house, one lot back. One of those off set shed roofs. It’s a small three-bedroom. But you walk in there, it’s our home. Unfortunately, a lot of people can’t do that. But my word to people who do own houses down here is to find out about the community, talk about the community, let the people who rent know about the community. Send them to community activities. Leave ideas in the house so they aren’t just sitting there. But a lot of people don’t really care. They’re like, “I want my little piece of paradise, or this beach. And I want it quiet. And I don’t want to see any more than one line of people running up the beach. If there’s more than one line of people on up the beach, then it’s no longer paradise.” But I don’t know what to say to those people, I don’t know how to do it. Maybe Eric has a way to convince them.
Eric: I don’t think there is a way. I mean, it’s a shared resource. If you don’t want to be on a shared resource, then don’t put your beach house on a national park.
Tim: That is absolutely correct. This the wrong place.
Eric: People seem to forget that this is a national park. They really do. Now it’s a beautiful national park and it’s not densely populated, but at the end of the day, it is a national park. It’s a shared resource. And we all have to get along. And some people don’t want that. They talk about their beach. But it’s not their beach, it’s our beach.
Tim: But I’ve been seeing a lot more VB people coming down who want to make Hatteras more of a second home. I’ve heard – or put two an and two together—but I can name a half dozen Virginia Beach couples who’ve bought true second homes here since the downturn. And that something we hadn’t seen before. It was all investment. And I’d say as much as a 1/3 of the sales we’ve seen in the past two or three years have been second homes. And that’s very good for the village I think. It might be a couple homes less in my rental program but there’s more to it than that. To me, every person that’s a true second homeowner, I want to reach over and hug them. Because, I feel better about someone who’s got a real commitment to the place than those that are in it for the quick hit. People are here because they want to be here because they love it.
Rich: I was talking to a volunteer on the project, and he said, I used to go to Nantucket. And it cost me $375 to take my truck across on the ferry, each way. And that kept the island very exclusive. But then what you had was a bunch of rich people on an island who would yell at each other. And say, “Your property fence is two inches too high.” I don’t ‘now if you get that around here. I don’t know that anyone would yell at you if you put a fence around your property to keep your dogs in.
It’s funny you say that. Because in discussing the long-term fate of Hatteras Island, I’ve made that comparison. Because this place could be Nantucket in 30 seconds if it wanted to be. I firmly believe if the bridge went down, this would become a high-end resort. There’s already an airport. And if it generated the same tax revenue…
Tim: I think that’s what would happen. You shut off access today, absent global warming and the tide rising, that’s’ what you’d end up with.
Eric: But that goes back to the vision for this place. When Conrad Wirth came down made this deal with Tim’s family, he said, “I’m going to turn this place into a national treasure that everyone gets to use, and you’re going to get to be merchants and motel operators and stuff.” And the thing people don’t think about is: what about the family that drives here all night from Ohio so they can get up and fish? And every possible minute they’re on the pier fishing and then they go home and work for 50 more weeks so they can come back do it next year. This place isn’t supposed to be Nantucket. And I think it’s the credit of the people around here that they recognize that. I think it’s to the discredit f the people who make it more difficult to gain access to the island. Because, again, we go back to the word ecology. Again, we’re part of the ecosystem. Going back to the guy from Ohio, he’s okay. He can come here. Because he’s part of the ecosystem. It isn’t like this is only for birds or turtles or fish; we’re all supposed to get along. And sometimes that gets lost on people.
Rich: I heard a neat story about a guy who lives up in Avon. He saw a couple getting married on the beach who didn’t have a photographer, so he shot some photos for them. And these people were so happy that someone would take the time to do that for them. And it was one of the nicest stories I’ve ever heard. That wouldn’t happen in Nantucket. It’s kind of like when they have gathering down here, everyone makes food. That’s how they get people to come together. That’s community. That’s neat.
And what’s funny is that another byproduct of that community feel is how protective people get. How you navigate that must be part of the difficulty. It’s like, “Yes, we want to bring more people here, but those people are going to not only help the economy but will blend in.” Like you were saying earlier, they’re mad about a pier, but it could’ve been a condo.
Tim: A whole bunch of condos.
Rich: But that wouldn’t have been horrible either. I mean, it wouldn’t have the best thing.
But it’s not worst-case scenario. The worst case scenario is doing nothing.
Tim: That’s where you really go backwards. In my estimation.
So what do you think this place looks like in 50 years. What are the threats, and what will be its salvation?
Tim: I was hoping you were gonna look at somebody else. [laughs] That’s a tough question. And in order to answer it you’d have to remove all the environmental issues going on. Again ,it’s two separate things. Absent the tide rising – and I mean globally — I like to think the place is going to be here and there’s going to be more uses like this. I mean, we’ve got a tremendous number of second homes and vacation homes here, as we do up and down the entire Outer Banks. And they have perhaps caused a paradigm shift as well. Because if we had those 400 rooms, quite frankly, a lot of them would be sitting vacant because people have gravitated toward those homes. Maybe it’s the together, maybe it’s the multi-generational family aspect, Maybe its just purely dollars. I was trying to put that last, but it may be first. And being in the business, I don’t know if that’s fair of me to say it’s purely economic. But again, that has cause a shift and forced people to either reinvent yourself or fall behind. And this island, things are happening here. And you can either be progressive or you can sit back and take potshots at the change. But the change is gonna happen. And I think it has to happen for us to persevere and move forward.
Eric: I’m not sure the hotels would be empty. Think about it now, it’s not he easiest place to get to and the system is set so you rent for a week. But if you could get a nice hotel easily, maybe people would run down for the weekend more.
It’d be interesting to see how the Hilton does. But it’s an interesting dynamic. I’m sure the Food Lion and Harris Teeter don’t mind. But a lot of its messaging, too. Cape point closed yesterday, and the first thing you heard was “Save a bird, kill an island.” That can’t be a good thing for people to hear. I mean, Corolla doesn’t have Cape Point either. And the parking pass may be an issue, but I’d rather pay 100 bucks and get to Hatteras than spend an your in Corolla traffic. I know you gotta lean on politicians and show need, but you need to put a positive message out there.
Eric: it would be really easy to put a positive message on that. When Cape Point closes – when ramps 44 and 45 close — put up a sign that says “Ramps 44 and 45 closed for wildlife protection, Ramp 49 is 4 miles up the road.” I’d tell people to go find the next ramp.
Rich: But they [the NPS] just put “ramp closed.”
Tim: And they do it on every portable sign from here to Virginia Beach.
Eric: And it would be an easy problem to deal with, but quite frankly now — and this I what I was telling you before. The park service is open to making these changes. I’m having conversations with the park service about how to make this place more visitor-friendly. And they’re open to them. They really are. And maybe that’s a subject for another day. But at some point, I predict you’ll see a sign like that put up by the federal government. And it won’ be a negative; it’ll be a positive. But you know what ramp 49 isn’t the point, but it’s still the beach and its still pretty damn nice and you can still catch fish there.
Rich: Where do I see this place in 50 years? I’ve been trying to educate myself on this place since I moved here. And this island is not the easiest place to live. You’ve got issues with weather. It’s got road issues. It’s got bridge issues. And the people who live here are very resilient people. I think they’ll always get by and they’ll always live here. But with the work that we’re doing, we can help the people that make this their community and home, we can help them thrive. And that’s why I got involved. Because we can help people thrive by doing something and being a part of the community. I’m not a big church-goer, but I like to be involved in the community. If there was a barn raising, I’d be the first guy up the ladder with my tools. But there’s always going to be people living here here. This island, with the gulf stream and the proximity to the continental shelf — it always going to be a great place to surf and a great place to fish. And I just see us being able the help people thrive. And the more we can do things like this and get people involved, I think this place is just going to better. It might not be as hard to live here as it was before. But that’s what I see in 30 or 40 years. I can’t see 50 years because I’m gonna be dead by then. [everyone laughs.]
But there is a long-term vision here. And a lot of times, when you see changes on the Outer Banks, there’s not a lot of long-term vision here when you see people making decisions. As much as I hate to say it, because I was the biggest foe to the “long bridge” when it first was being discussed, once you see the 50-year plan for short-bridge only leaves you with five miles of access to Pea Island. Possibly spotty access. And makes dredging the inlet even tougher, I decided that if a long bridge would bring more reliable access to Hatteras and allow that jetty to be removed so the inlet would stay open and let sand flow south, I’d make that sacrifice. But big picture discussion like that just get washed away because user groups say, “what’s this going to do for me right now?”
Rich: Eric sold me on that. I’m a long-term stockholder kind of guy. I’m a guy who buys stock and holds on to it. I don’t flip it. And you’re talking about sustainable growth. And one of the things Eric sold me on was he said, “I like sustainable growth, as well. “ And sustainable growth economics is you build for the long term. You don’t build for next year, you build something that’s going to last 15 years. And that’s one of the things he used to sell me.
Eric: Yeah, it took me 25 years to get my business to the point where anybody wanted to buy it. And it took 20 years to really get the private school on solid footing.
To me, this feels like a positive byproduct that’s slipstreaming all the negative thinking we we’re discussing earlier. This idea of, things are going to be different than what than they were, but it’s going to be good. We’re going to stop screaming about the bad side, and focus on the good side.
Tim: But isn’t that probably a function of social media that everybody’s dealing with? I’m an eternal optimist. But let’s face it: the guys who are blogging, are not optimists. They’re pessimists.
Rich: They’re gonna be angry about something.
Tim: And that’s probably a bad stereotype, but to a big degree it’s true. And with social media, that guy who came to ramp 44 yesterday and couldn’t get there, he probably Facebooked immediately that this place sucks. But that’s just negativity. And nobody’s going to overcome that.
Not unless people post “no it doesn’t” right after it. It’s up to other people to put out a positive message.
Tim: But the positive message guy is out doing something positive. [everyone laughs] He’s using positive energy to do positive things.
Eric: But I will say this in fairness to other people. I have the luxury – and I know Rich does, too – of being able to say, “You know what? We’ve got the time to think long-term, because we’re not sitting here trying to make the mortgage payment or trying to make the payroll.” I’ve run a business for many, many years. I know what it’s like to wake up in the morning and say, “Holy crap, how am I going to make payroll today? I hope the orders come in.” So, I don’t want to be disrespectful of the people who need to think short term. Because you know what? If you don’t think short term, there is no long term. It’s finding that balance. And that’s where I think people like us can come in. We have this obligation to give back, because we’ve made our money. We have a solid foundation. So it’s our turn to give back and help the other folks. So I think everybody needs to look at the other peoples’ motivation and try to understand them. It’s the old cliché, walk in the other guy’s shoes. What’s interesting about the people around here, what’s blowing my mind – although I’m starting to get used to it — is a lot of people around here don’t understand altruism. They look at me, they look at Rich and they say, “What’s in it for you guys?”
Rich: They can’t see that there’s no profit But the profit is mental for me.
Eric: Well said.
Rich: the profit is in here and here [points to this head and his heart]. I feel good, I can go to bed a t night. I know that I’ve done something that’s good. I know I’ve helped a couple veterans, I know I’ve helped a couple musicians, I know I’ve helped a couple of people on Hatteras Island. I feel good.
Eric: I worked my butt off for more than 30 years, so I could have enough freedom to come and be altruistic. But I worked hard for it. It wasn’t given to me. I worked very, very hard. And was very lucky. And I don’t know. Tim, do you think people are ever going to get it that we’re just trying to be helpful?
Tim: I was just thinking that very thing. And you’re spot on: they just don’t understand it. It’s like, “What’s he doing? What’s in it for him? It’s all personal motive.” And I don’t see that at all. And I don’t know why people think he exudes that. I guess it’s because he’s a goer and doer, and they think because he’s going and doing, he’s doing something for his own personal benefit. Same with Rich. And it’s the furthest thing from the truth.
Rich: Maybe it’s because, so many people have come here and said, “I’m here to help, I’m going to do something.” And then they walk away with a full pocket and nobody gets anything. So again: lead by example. And that’s what Eric’s doing. And what Tim’s doing. They’re leading by example. So you can sit there and talk all you want, but talk is cheap as they say. But I was just thinking, maybe one we way could talk to people if they don’t believe us, is we could put into a church concept and say this is the way we get our spiritual fulfillment. And some people down here might buy that. But I feel good about myself at the end of the day.
So what’s the timeframe?
Eric: So this, the ecology center, will be open by the end of May, first of June. The pier? That’s a guessing game at this point. We have so much money to raise, so the thing we need to do now is —first, of all, we’ve been putting just about all our emotional and physical energy into this for a few months, because we’re so close to having this. And it made more sense to get this going, prove that we know what we’re doing, create a destination and start giving something back to the community. And hopefully by doing this, we can start to plant the seeds that are going to help the pier become a reality.
And then you go and source funds for that. And when you go to source funds, I’m assuming it’s not just locally.
Eric: No, we’re looking all over. We did get a nice grant from the Nora Roberts Foundation to kick start things. But the other thing is, and I said this at the meeting last night that we were at: even if we never build a pier, so what? We did this. And the way we’ve got the pier phased, is we start with a beach access and a bathhouse just to create more access and parking. And then the next step is to build a pier house. And people say, “Well how are you going to get the pier done?” Well, you know what, let’s look at our worst-case scenario: if we create a beach access and an event center to bring people here and help drive economy – because 150 people coming down for a week to attend a wedding is a lot of money into economy – then so what if we don’t build a pier. You’ve got a nice access and there could be handicap access. What’s the down side? It’s really interesting, but like Rich was saying earlier: when you look someone in the eye and ask them to explain what their problem with the project is, we’ve haven’t been able to get any specific answers.
Well, it’s nice to have someone coming into the community to do something that’s not self-serving. That’s not a straight up, “I’m gonna go sell a bunch of t-shirts an put the money in my pocket.”
Eric: Well, we are going to sell a bunch of t-shirts. But we’re gonna use the money to help fund ecology exhibits. Why? You wanna buy a t-shirt? [laughs]
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ALL RISK. NO REWARD.
NC-20’s Willo Kelly explains why the insurance game stays rigged against coastal homeowners — and what you can do to protect your own interest.
When it comes to insurance, Outer Bankers get the short end of the stick. (Or the long end of it, depending on how you look at it.) And we get hit with it repeatedly.
Just ask Willo Kelly. As president of the coastal lobby NC-20 — and government liaison for the Outer Banks Homebuilders’ Association and the Association of Realtors — she’s poured over countless documents and policies for the past five years and two previous rate increases. In the process, Kelly has determined what you may have already suspected: insurance companies use hurricanes and suspicious models to hike up rates along the Atlantic, while keeping them low everywhere else in North Carolina — even though inland counties suffer greater losses and file more claims. For 2013, the rate bureau requested another 30% increase, triggering a hearing by the Department of Insurance. It was while reading the paperwork that Kelly found more than just confusing boilerplate. She found vindication.
“All you had do was read the first page,” she says. “’Filing suffers from significant deficiencies’; ‘pervasive lack of documentation’; ‘data is so questionable that a proper evaluation of this filing . . . various components and methodologies, is obstructed.’ Basically everything we’ve been saying: that the whole system is flawed.”
With the homeowners hearing set for June, we sat down with Ms. Kelly to find out just how things got so out of whack — and why coastal residents keep getting whacked worst of all. —Matt Walker
MILEPOST: What’s the best way to describe your title?
WILLO KELLY: I handle government affairs for the Outer Banks Homebuilders’ Association and the Outer Banks Association of Realtors. I also serve in a volunteer capacity for NC-20 as president. NC-20 has opened the doors to legislators to work on this issue.
How did you get involved? And can you give me a history of the issue?
I was the first hired president of the Currituck Chamber of Commerce back in 1999 and this discussion goes back to then. In 1993, there was a rate filing and another in 99 and a couple more before my term with the chamber. And we had discussions then that instead of being 5 years apart, these filings were coming more frequently. But it didn’t consume my life like it does now. I’ve never sold insurance. I’ve never taken a class on insurance. I’ve talked to a lot of insurance agents and looked at a lot of policies. I can tell you how to read your policy and what to look at. That’s something that needs to be made more public. Because when you’re talking about a tough economy, people are hurting and everyone wants to raise their rates: power, phone bill, insurance. The things you think of as fixed expenses aren’t. But I think I’ve been given the title of consumer advocate only because I read thousands of pages and figured it out. So people call me about insurance. And between NC-20, I’ve become sort of the go-to person. But I do joke that it’s because I read the refiling and nobody else wanted to.
I think everyone assumes insurance is going to go up no matter what. Why is this rate filing different from 2009? Why now? And why this much? Because we keep hearing 30% . . .
That’s homeowners insurance. There’s a lot of moving parts and components. I’m still learning things. The filing alone for 2012 is almost 1400 pages. And a lot of the information it seems like you’re not meant to understand. It’s not spelled out in layman’s terms.
And when we hear that everything goes up, we assume that’s because costs go up. But let’s not forget, insurance is the business of risk. And insurance is sort of like gambling, you give me this money, I’ll cover you for this much, and I’m going to roll the dice. You give me $10, I’ll cover you for $1000. And the insurance industry knows that only 10 percent maybe — sometimes 6 to 8 percent — ever file a claim. And the more you can spread the risk, the greater your chances are you will win. And in the past, it’s been the spread of risk over a period of time. Today, all insurance companies are investment companies. They’re taking your money and using it to invest and show shareholders a profit. So the reason we’re seeing these increases is because their business model has changed from looking at it over 10 years or 20 years — good years outweigh the bad years, and we’re profitable over a period of time — to one year. And when people hear insurance companies are facing billions in losses, they don’t know there’s $586 billion in this fund called ‘policy holder surplus.”
That’s the money they pay out in case of a loss.
Well, in theory. But I had an insurance lobbyist tell me, ” that’s not ‘policy holder surplus’ that’s shareholder dividends.” So we’re now looking at having to pay every year to the possible worst-case scenario of risk. So we’re moving the money, is what we’re doing.
Sounds like a Ponzi scheme. Take in new money to pay out to other people.
You said it. I didn’t. And then they come up with his product of reinsurance, where they can purchase a product to cover their risk.
What’s reinsurance?
So we have this company in Germany or Bermuda who says, “we think you’re a pretty good risk, you give us money and we’ll cover your catastrophic risk.” And the interesting thing about reinsurance is: insurance companies own reinsurance companies. They are the investors in insurance companies. There is billions and billions of dollars flowing through the reinsurance companies as investment money. And that has gotten so out of hand that if you’re a customer of Farm Bureau, they spend 40% of their premiums on reinsurance costs.
So how’s this happen?
I should have Post-its to show how this works. [laughs] It starts with the Department of Insurance and the North Carolina Rate Bureau. We’re the only state that still has a rate bureau. We’re one of 11 states that have an elected insurance commissioner. Politics are heavily involved here. We have basically proven almost unequivocally that our rates have gone up in the past as a political move by the insurance commissioner who has kept the rates low in other parts of the state. And it’s been an easy sell that our rates should go up because we live on the coast so we have these hurricanes. But general statues aren’t supposed to look at the risk of hurricanes; they’re supposed to look at catastrophe. And we’ve more than proven that catastrophes hit the entire state when you look at actual loss numbers. So why is it that 32 counties and the city of Charlotte have not seen a homeowners rate increase since 1993? Why? Because that’s where the votes are. And it looks like the same thing happened in this November agreement with the dwelling rate filing; he did the same darn thing.
Well, if you only have 30,000 people in a county, there’s only so much political power you can wield.
Even if we network and we came together in the 20 coastal counties — if all 20 counties voted as one block — we only have 8% of the voters. From what I hear, next year 16 [inland] counties will have 60 percent of the votes. Look at the number of legislators, we’re losing representation when Wake County is gaining representation. So when we go to a house or senate insurance committee meeting [coastal NC] might have one or two representatives on the committee where you can have two guys from Wake County, etc. And they have been — I don’t want to say brainwashed — but the perception they have is we don’t pay our fair share. That there’s tremendous problems with the insurance market and the Beach Plan — which is not a state entity, as people are lead to believe. But even our legislators don’t always understand the structure.
So what is the structure? Isn’t the beach plan your wind and hail policy?
A separate wind and hail policy can only be written through the Beach Plan. We really need visuals. First you’ve got the Department of Insurance, which regulates all insurance in the state of NC. And the commissioner is supposed to be the consumer advocate — a consumer advocate that’s elected and gets money for his campaign from the insurance industry predominantly. I’ve likened it to an energy commissioner getting all his money from Exxon. We’d all be screaming bloody murder. Last year, was the first year our commissioner went out of state to get money for his campaign, and he went to Atlanta and Chicago, which have big insurance ties. So after the Department of Insurance you have the rate bureau. All insurance companies that write policies in the state must be members of the rate bureau. The rate bureau has a board made of company representatives. In the Department of Insurance, the commissioner is basically the almighty — once he makes a decision you can’t challenge him. The court of appeals said that. So if he’s working with the rate bureau on a rate filing, the only person who can sue are either the rate bureau or the Department of Insurance.
So there’s no recourse.
Exactly. So this is the fox, this the henhouse. And then over here — created in 1969 to allow for the development of oceanfront properties — you’ve got the North Carolina Insurance Underwriters Association, better known as the Beach Plan. And it was called the Beach Plan because it only covered oceanfront houses. And every company writing in the state of NC also has to belong to the Beach Plan. And — now this is the best thing ever — whether you write a policy in Eastern North Carolina or not, you belong to NCIUA. And premiums go in and when there’s no losses, they take the money and it’s distributed to every insurance company working in the state of NC.
So it’s not like they built up a fund in case of disaster, either.
Not until 2009. So, the going’s good. And it keeps going good for 25 years. So in 2006, they distributed $41 million from the Beach Plan. Some moneys before were used for losses, operating, distribution. They kept a little surplus fund. But there’s obviously been some mismanagement because the same people who took the money then came to the General Assembly and said: “Oh my gosh we need help. This is a ticking time bomb, we don’t have money in case we have a new loss.” But what they didn’t tell the legislators is they were sucking the money out of the fund for 26 years.
Correct my memory — was it Fran that came in 1996? And is that when rates first really spiked?
Yes. Hugo came in 89 but that really came up and devastated Charlotte. Then Fran came in and devastated Raleigh. We’re under the assumption that we pay premiums and that goes into a big pot of money to pay out claims. But the large majority of the people don’t file claims. And even if 30% of people filed claims, the companies operate so they still make money. But in ’98 and ’99 they were in the hole by $40 and $42 million. And that’s when they went to the general assembly and said, “There’s a problem.” So in 2006 they took out $41 million dollars; yet in 2008 they’re saying “We have a problem.” So in 2010, we took that information to the general assembly. Because it’s divided up by market share: if Farm Bureau has 15% of the market share in North Carolina, they get 15% [of the surplus in the Beach Plan]. If Nationwide has 10%, they get 10%. If you wrote 1 percent of the market share of policies in the state of North Carolina you got a check for $410,000, without ever having to write a policy in eastern NC. And if you take all the money they’ve distributed over time and add it up, it’s more than the companies have had to pay out [in losses].
So it also sounds like its gone from “Let’s collect the money and save it to hedge against future losses” to investing premiums and distributing the money as profit, while buying reinsurance against the losses — and building that cost into future premiums. Because the other side of this is filing a claim and not getting any money back. We all know people who got no money after Irene and we all know insurance companies work hard to get out of paying claims. A buddy of mine played golf with an insurance broker who boasted he made a six-figure bonus for not writing any policies on Irene.
And where does that money come form? You say, we’re at this tremendous risk, you don’t want to write here, we’re dumping all these policies into the Beach Plan — but you’ve taken all this money for years. And nobody knew this until we all started working together and shared this information. I’ll give Marc Basnight all the credit in the world. Had he not looked at the loss information and the distribution of the surplus money — and the 32 counties and the city of Charlotte not seeing a rate increase since 1993 — and stood up as a speaker in 2009 and interjected, we would have paid $12 million more in premiums as Eastern North Carolina policy holders that first year. He put into the bill they could no longer take money out of the surplus; they could only use it for operating costs and losses and reinsurance. So reinsurance went way up.
So it’s another Goldman Sachs, Wall Street before mainstream situation: they get the money then use it to cut their personal risk, then add that cost to your bill. And then they try not to pay on the other side.
I had a friend in New York who used to say, “If you want to make money, use the other man’s money.” And that’s what this is. But insurance is a critical component of our economy because without insurance you can’t get a mortgage. So it affects affordable housing, financing. We’re gonna see flood insurance change here. It used to be if you built your house to a government standard, you kept that zone. And if the map changed, you kept that rate because you obeyed the law. The national flood insurance program reform now says, if you go from one zone to the other you pay the new rate. We don’t care if you’ve been in your house 15 years, your insurance can go from $1250 a year to $13,000. And your mortgage company will make it mandatory that you pay it. And if you can’t, how many people would that force into foreclosure? This is what happened in Florida. Insurance went up so much the market value of their homes dropped. And I was told a few years ago by an environmental lobbyist who wanted to see no more development, that his network of people know how to make that happen via regulation and through insurance — just make the insurance so expensive that no one will invest here. And we’ll become cash only. Talk to a realtor on Hatteras Island they’ll say most transactions are cash sales. Because they’re not mandated to buy the insurance. So are people really self-insuring? Or are we going to see a bunch of abandoned properties if we have a big storm? There’s a great report by Robert Hunter who’s with the Consumer Federation of America. He’s a former insurance commissioner in Texas and he wrote a great paper about disappearing risk. And Hurricane Andrew was the game changer in 92. That’s when everyone woke up and said, we’ve got to do something,
But insurance companies, unlike utilities, can say “I won’t write there anymore” so they can cherry pick [based on risk]. They also set their own rates through collusion. So we pay based on worst-case scenario. For example, Isabel: we didn’t really a have a major catastrophe since then until Irene, in terms of huge coastal losses. So in that time frame, they had all these good years. But they still want to abandon us. But the government says they have to show they have the wherewithal to pay. You can’t just start writing insurance. You have to have a balance to pay it. And when people hear insurance companies are facing billions in losses, they don’t know there’s $586 billion in this fund called ‘policy holder surplus.” And that’s the unfortunate thing, even $60 billion in losses, look at the premiums that are being paid. But the lobby has a lot on their side because they can manipulate the numbers so you feel like we have a terrible problem and we don’t pay what other states pay. And that’s what happened in our general assembly.
When I look through the last homeowner rate filing, there’s’ a way to calculate how much you paid per dollar for losses. And from 2001 to 2005, the Outer Banks portion of Dare County, for every dollar we paid in for five years, only six cents paid for losses. And in inland areas, every policy that paid a dollar, 22 cents paid for losses.
So there’s no equity in terms of historical losses. Our rates are based on a model projection, but we’re not privy to the info that goes into the model. And in this dwelling rate filing — when they finally scrutinized a rate filing — it was proved that the modeling rate was questionable. It looked like there were excessive numbers used. The methodology was actually illegal and they issued a findings of fact that justified everything we’ve said for three years: it’s a broken system; that there had never been a scrutiny of a rate filing since 1993; that there’s an insurance commissioner reaching a settlement with a rate bureau made up of industry representatives; and the public isn’t notified of an increase in rates until it was a done deal. Finally we have legislation that says the commissioner must hold a public comment on a rate filing. And if he holds a hearing, he has an opportunity to come back with a modified rate.
But the Department of Insurance determined — after the scrutiny of this rate filing — that the current dwelling rates should go down 11 to 30 percent and they denied the filing. That’s how excessive they stated the losses to be. This is coming from the Department of Insurance’s dwelling rates findings. But what happened caught us completely off guard: the rate bureau appealed this hearing and these findings and three weeks after the election the insurance commissioner says, “You know what? If we roll the dice and go to court, they might win.” And if they win, they get everything they wanted. All the increases. So rather than take that chance on going to court he decides to reach a settlement agreement with a rate bureau. And he basically gave them everything they want. So we went through the whole process for nothing.
So what was the deal? Did they split the difference? Did he give them half of what they wanted?
No. He basically gave them everything they wanted — in the coastal counties. In the other counties he didn’t. So, let’s say in Dare, Currituck and Hyde on the barrier island we pay $477 per $50,000. They wanted $619: he gave them $597. So instead of 28% he gave them 25%.
But if they’d gone to court, the rates also could’ve gone down 11 to 30%.
Right. Where’s the rationale in any of this? They held a 3-month trial that said rates should go down, he then reaches an agreement that gives them — not an 11-30% decrease, but a 25% increase. And that’s where statewide increase numbers are so off. Because you’re 5 to 15 percent in the western part of the state and 40 % on the coast. So, basically, Charlotte, at the end of the three years, is paying 3 dollars more. And we’re going to be paying a hell of a lot more than 3 dollars. This situation just shows how flawed the system is.
But their total number of policies is higher, right?
They’re getting more in premiums, too. That is what they’re saying. And the risk is spread to more policy holders in Charlotte than here. Yeah, but we still we don’t have the losses to justify this [type of increase.] If 32 counties and the city of Charlotte are paying less in homeowner’s insurance premiums than they did in 1993, there’s a problem here, politically. If they’re going to use the justification that rates have to go up because of the increase in building costs or the market, there’s a problem that 1/3 of our state hasn’t seen an increase. However, they’re led to believe that their premiums are going up because of people on the coast. But their premiums go up, not because of the rates — because they haven’t gone up — the premiums go up because the insurance companies apply an inflation rate factor to your policy every year. And they’ve gotten so greedy that instead of 2 to 4 percent, it’s going up 10 to 12 percent. So every year, when you get your premium and it’s more, it’s because the dwelling value that you had listed [has gone up]. At first you had $100,000 down to rebuild — and that’s another thing people need to understand, it’s not your land value, its’ the cost to rebuild ¬—now you’re at $110,000 because they say the cost of building went up 10%. Really? And the second year, you’re going up $21,000. By the fourth year, your dwelling value went from $100,000 to $142,000.
And that’s only the cost to rebuild. Not market value. And people don’t understand your policy should only reflect the cost of rebuilding as of this year. And if something changes tremendously and the price of lumber goes through the roof, it might need to go up a little higher. But that one number determines what the companies say is their exposure. It’s inflated, it’s artificial, and it’s excessive. Because they’re using that number not just to determine your rebuild costs, but everything else. If your dwelling value is $100,000, that’s what your premium is based on. So is your deductible. So if you’re in the wind pool, you’re going to have a 1% named storm deductible. That’s $1000 every time the wind blows from a named storm and you have damage. If you have three named storms, that’s $3000. So after five years, your dwelling goes to $150,000 and your deductible goes to $1500. But it still only costs $100,000 to rebuild – maybe $110,000. So, there’s $400 to $500 more in deductible you’re paying. And your premium is more. And the agent’s commission is based on the [dwelling value], too.
Now, Nationwide just lowered their sales commission from 14% to 10% because the company said the agents were being paid too much money. But they’re still getting 13% from the Beach Plan [policies they write]. Because there’s no agents in the Beach Plan. It’s your company writing the policy, and the agent gets the commission. So we’re going to have an argument this year: why is the Beach Plan paying more commission? Because we’re actually incentivizing these companies to put policies in the beach plan. Why would they assume the risk when their agents can make more money. But here’s the interesting thing: people say, I’ve got $70,000 of personal property contents, and $15,000 in loss of use and $15,000 in other structures. That’s $100,000 that companies say you have to carry so it matches your dwelling. Now, all of a sudden the insurance company says it has $200,000 in exposure. And that’s the number you keep hearing, ‘We have too much exposure . Our aggregate liability for the $74 billion.”
But that’s including contents.
And the sheds you don’t even have in your backyard. And if this number is inflated, then they’re basing their modeling when they go in and say we have $74 billion in exposure, they’re saying, “If we have 100% total loss, this is the number we have to pay out.” That’s not what they’re going to have to pay out. Because the number is inflated already. Who has $70,000 in personal property and contents in a $100,000 house? I mean, your cabinetry and windows and stuff are all part of your homeowners policy.
Isn’t contents just stuff that’s not attached. Isn’t that why you videotape your house before a hurricane comes through?
Exactly. But if you have jewelry, if you have artwork, you better have a rider on your policy because it’s not going to cover it anyway. So you take it up to $300,000, now you have $210,000 in personal property. But they’ll never pay that. So when we look at modeled losses, this total exposure number of $74 billion based on a major catastrophic storm. Basically, they take Hazel from ’54 or 55 — because it’s the only Cat 4 storm to ever make landfall in NC — and they say, “If Hazel comes up the coast again, this is what we’ll pay.” So that’s what we pay to: Hazel. And this is strictly homeowners; this isn’t commercial policies or hotels. So when you hear losses in New Jersey of $35 to $40 billion, that’s everything. And they say we have a $74 billion dollar loss potential based on the risk in the wind pool. And there are very few commercial properties in the beach plan. But even if all the companies who do business in North Carolina said, “This is our exposure,” it’s still wrong.
And that’s technically a fraction of what they have in their chest anyway.
We thought after 2009 when the state said they couldn’t touch the wind money anymore that the pot would be growing. And somebody always posts comments like, “Oh yeah, our rates are going to go up because of people on the coast. ” But the facts are, in 41 years of the Beach Plan — from 1970 -2011 — we heave paid in $2.2 billion in premiums. But 41 years of cumulative losses only totals $784 million. We’ve paid $2.2 billion in the beach plan, we’ve paid out $784 million.
And that’s all the coastal counties.
This is everyone in the Beach Plan. Eighteen coastal counties. And we’ve expanded the program. We are no longer a coastal insurance private pool, we are an eastern Northern Carolina wind pool. Probably 200,000 policy holders. My husband Mike’s parents live in Camden and they’ve had to go into the Beach Plan. We knew they were spending on reinsurance but we expected once they couldn’t touch the surplus any more we’d be well over a billion within a few years. But still, the Beach Plan is no ticking time bomb. The Beach Plan has more than paid for itself. But inland counties don’t know. They don’t know their premiums are going up because there’s an inflation rate attached.
In fact, we’re paying for them because we’re paying higher rates…
Oh yeah. So they can keep their rates lower. And I even had an insurance person, say to me back in 2009: “We don’t care where we get the increases. If the insurance commissioner’s only going to give us increases on the coast instead of us going through the court process, we’ll agree with that.” But they don’t want to write here anyway because they want to reduce their risk. It’s been proven that after 1992 and Hurricane Andrew, something like almost 80 percent of losses were paid by insurance companies. After Katrina it was down to 60 percent.
And Sandy is already hitting FEMA up and down.
After Katrina, you saw a shift to where less money was paid by insurance companies and more came from the federal government. FEMA stepped in. So it seems like more insurance companies are backing away from their risk. They have exclusions in policies where they can divide it up by state. I found it interesting that in the case of Alaska, if you have damage to your house from snow melt, it’s not covered. If you live in California or Nevada and have earthquake damage it’s not covered.
Unless you have an earthquake policy; and in California you have to.
Exactly. So, we’ve shifted from a homeowner paying a premium every year and knowing they’re covered if something happens and they have a loss to “let’s see what we can either back out of or make you pay more for.” And they were considering in the beach plan not covering wind driven rain for homeowners wind policies. What the heck is a hurricane if not wind-driven rain? So where’s the consumer advocate? There’s no one there. Through homeowners and realtors and builders and NC-20, we’ve gotten some of this information out, but we need to have a much broader, louder effort.
So what can people do moving forward. And what’s the time frame? Dwelling is settled right? Some people think the pushing off to June was a political decision as well. Do you agree?
Will we even see June? He could settle with the rate bureau before we even get there.
But it seems hard to believe that no one in the assembly understands that they’re screwing people.
Well, as long as it’s the people on the coast, it’s fine. Look: the facts are the facts. And they don’t want to argue them, they want to ignore them. Senator Harry Brown , luckily, is the senate Majority leader, and he’s from Onslow County. And he totally gets it. He’s been fighting this fire the past couple of years. He has a house in the mountains and one in Onslow. And in Onslow, he’s paying 5 times more than Asheville; and the Asheville house is bigger. And there’s actually a wind overlay map that NOAA does, and it shows the entire state of NC is susceptible to 200 mph winds. You’ve got an overlay of hurricane prone area and, of course, hurricanes come in from the Atlantic, so you’d assume this certain area is more prone to hurricanes. But there’s a whole separate part in the mountains called a ‘special wind zone. ‘ They don’t pay any more for that special wind zone, And they don’t have to build to the same strict codes so when it does happen they suffer tremendous losses.
But New Jersey will get what they want because they have tons of people on the coast. Does Raleigh need to understand if people can’t live here, we wont have the infrastructure to support the tourism industry. Because it’s not all rich people.
We’ve argued that point. The people who live here aren’t the wealthy people. They think everyone here is from Pine Island. That’s the perception. But the majority of people who live here and will be affected by these homeowner’s policies — and that’s what this hearing will be about in June; and it will take place like a trial. There’s no public comment, we had our day in court. But it’s about homeowners policies, the people who live in NC and are trying to own a home. And we forget about it because we have this great tourism economy here, but the people south of us are big military people. And a lot of military families live paycheck to paycheck. And these big increases can put them out. So we may have an ally with the military family lobbyists and what not.
So between now and June, what do people do? Are there insurance companies that are better than others? Or things you can do with your policy?
Nationwide was one of the last companies to write wind and homeowners policies together. They’re not writing any new policies that include wind. They’re also dropping their current wind polices and forcing them to go into the beach plan. The problem with forcing people into the beach plan — or coastal property insurance pool, which they renamed it in 2009 — is people in our state think we’re getting this great deal and we have this special insurance just for us. And that it’s to help us. But you pay the maximum rate allowed, which is approved by the insurance commission in the rate filing. A lot of people get discounted rates just to get their business. They don’t pay the maximum. In certain market times you’re out to get all the money you can because the investment market is so good. Well, the investment market isn’t so good now so they’ve backed off the discounts. But we don’t get that. What we have to do is when we go into the NCIUA — when we are forced into the NCIUA — we pay the maximum rate plus 5% for wind-only policies and plus 15% on full coverage homeowners policies. So the legislators were led to believe that this was supposed to be a market of last resort. And to deter people from going into the beach plan — to make them look into the voluntary market or even the surplus market — they added this surcharge. But those charges should be criminal because we don’t choose to go there. It’s our only option.
Are there any companies still writing wind policies?
If you look at the info on the beach plan and where the policy holders are, it looks to me like it’s becoming more of an Eastern North Carolina wind pool, where all the companies are putting their wind risk in the wind pool. Allstate was one of the first to announce, then State Farm. Farm Bureau just dropped 35,000 policies. And it seems like the big companies forced the little guys out because they could afford more risk, and now the big guys are backing out. So the problem is you’ve got a business that — although they’re very similar to a utility — they don’t have to write. They can pick and choose. And they’ve decided that since the market’s bad, and they don’t need our money that bad, they’re not going to cover catastrophic risk. And nothing says that they have to. So the bottom line is we need to find a better way to manage our catastrophic risk. And we’re having that conversation with people in other states as well. Because on the Gulf Coast this could have a greater negative impact than the oil spill.
So could you team up across state lines?
Insurance is regulated by the state so you can’t cross state lines. But we’re having conversations to see if we can create a multi-state compact to see if we can go across state lines. The cost of reinsurance just in Eastern North Carolina alone through the end of 2011, every dollar we paid into the beach plan — which was $330-some million dollars in premium in one year — two thirds of that went out to buy reinsurance. And it sounds good: here’s a back up plan in case of emergency. But it’s not 10 percent of what we’re paying. It’s 67% of what we’re paying. If people in NC knew, given the state of the economy and the outsourcing of jobs, that 67 cents of every hard earned dollar that went toward premiums in the wind pool went to pay for reinsurance overseas…
What if you did a public service campaign that laid out the difference between rates — like “you love coming here, we can’t maintain this” — what would the rest of the state have to pay to keep our rates from going up 400? $20? $50?
You’ll have more people come out and say that you’re a fool for living there ,it’s your problem. That’s so sad. But that’s the sentiment I’m hearing from people. But 52% of the US population lives within 50 miles of the coast.
And everyone’s got disasters. Vermont got shredded by Irene. California has earthquakes. So what’s the average person need to do with their insurance policy. What’s the quick fix?
Well here’s something we want to advocate for next year and work with our department of insurance on. There should be a disclosure statement in every renewal policy that says, “This was your dwelling value last year, we have applied X amount percent. This s your dwelling value this year. This value represents the cost of rebuilding your structure of your home. It does not include the cost of this or this. It is not the market value. This number is the number used to determine your deductible and your premium.” I wouldn’t even mind if they said this number determines your agent’s commission. But there should be some kind of disclosure statement. Because they have in many cases arbitrarily applied an inflation rate factor that increased your dwelling value, which increases your premium, and people don’t understand the whole process of how rates are set. So they can just apply this rate. And you don’t know it happened.
If you do know, can you beat ’em back? Or do they say , “Go someplace else.”
We know a guy in Manteo who had a ranch house, no bells and whistles, 2200 square feet. His insurance went up to $9000 a year from $7000. That’s $750 a month. That would’ve been a house payment years ago. But they had his house valued at $500,000. His builder says, “It’s not going to cost me 250k to rebuild.” But they’ve got this software program they use when you first get your policy and they plug in the numbers — square footage, number of windows, type of foundation, upgrades — and say, “This is your cost to rebuild.” So he says “run those numbers again.” It came up at $350, 000. But because of the inflation rate being applied every year over four or five years without him paying attention, it was $500,000. Insurance companies don’t like to do that because it lowers their overall exposure. But if we were to do an ‘auto correct’ across all the policies, there would be a huge shift down in companies’ overall exposure. And a huge decrease in premiums and revenues in 9 out of 10 policies. So the first thing people need to do is call and say, “I want to reevaluate my dwelling value.” Put those numbers through the software program and see what they come up with.
But I guess the risk is it may go up too.
It’ll never go the other way. I guarantee. And the agents who live here and work here are good people and want to help you, but there are decisions made on the corporate level and they’re hand fed information. I mean, when I’ve talked to insurance agents, they had no clue about the loss history. They were only given information of, “This is the Beach Plan, the risk is this, there’s not enough money to pay it.” And I’m like, “They took $130 million out over 20 years.” They don’t know that. But your agent is typically the frontline person getting hit with “Why are my premiums going up?” And yet it’s the higher-up levels and the lobbying that’s affecting the consumer.
So, getting back to poor Joe who found out he only needed $350,000 to rebuild. I said, “Joe, you should talk to the Department of Insurance about this and show them your renewal policy from the past few years. You might be able to get some money back from your company.” And his answer was — and I’ve heard it over and over again— ” I don’t want to get my agent in trouble. He’s a good guy.”
I know a woman in Currituck whose insurance was $250,000. The tax value on the structure was only $117,000. I said, “Tell your agent it won’t cost more than 130k to rebuild.” I followed up with her and she says, “He said he wanted to make sure I had enough coverage, so he brought it down to $180,000.” But she’ll never get that $180,000. It’s not like life insurance. If your house burns down, they’re not going to give you a check for $180,000 plus another 70% for contents. They’re only going to pay the cost to rebuild it.
And if you can’t prove you owned the contents, they’re not going to give you a nickel on the inside.
Exactly. You don’t even necessarily get the money up front. Sometimes you pay and get reimbursed. Now, here’s something some people don’t know. In an HO3 policy — the best homeowners policy that you can have — after a hurricane there will be demand surge. You’ll see prices go up for lumber and such. With a Homeowners 3 policy, if you have 100k coverage, the company will cover you up to $125,000 . That’s why you pay more. I’m not sure they pay that in the wind pool, it should follow, but they don’t tell you that.
Well, you’re always going to get up-sold. You walk in looking for a TV, it’s always, “Have you seen this model?”
But it’s your insurance agent — and “agent” is a term used to describe someone working your behalf. What I’ve seen is we have insurance salesmen. And when it comes to losses, I have friends who are agents and seem to be very, very good people. But you also have the guy who was charging Joe $9000 a year and making x commission.
The other pitfall is knowing your policy. People after Irene were shocked to find out that if they were at a certain elevation, the contents under their house weren’t covered — but their neighbor’s garage was.
Right.
Now what about named storms. The National Weather Service isn’t naming nor’easters, but the Weather Channel is. Is that something we need to be worried about?
If the Weather Channel is doing it, I’m not sure it matters. But it’s pretty interesting that Cuomo and Christie came out and said they were going to talk to the insurance companies about waving deductibles. The logic there was that when the storm made landfall it wasn’t actually hurricane force winds. Therefore it wasn’t a hurricane . There’s the difference. When we start getting compared to other states, people say NC is paying lower premiums than any other states. I was told by the Beach Plan manager that we’re paying less coastal premiums than other states because our deductible is 1% compared to 2%. And I said, first of all North Carolina has not had the losses that other states have had — you can’t compare us to Texas or Florida by any means — so we should be paying less. Second, the deductible situation, somehow through that Beach Plan reform, they wanted 1% on any wind; and we thought we won by saying “named storm” instead of any wind losses. The insurance lobby was pushing for a 1% deductible in the wind pool regardless of whether it was a nor’easter or a thunder storm. We got it to ‘named storm.’ But other states have a hurricane deductible.
So ours is 36 mph instead of 74.
Exactly. And we don’t just pay named storm for the year — like they have a hurricane deducible for the whole year so their deductible is like their medical deductible — we have a named storm deductible per occurrence. So if we get two named storms we still pay that deductible twice. Three storms, we pay three times. That’s the other difference.
Wow.
So I try to educate the legislators. One good thing is Eastern North Carolina legislators — democrat, republican, whatever —have formed a caucus. I gave several presentations to them about insurance, so they’re all on the same page and are armed with the facts so when a lobbyist does come in they can say, “What about this?” That’ll be very beneficial to those of us on the coast. I truly believe that knowledge is power. And I still believe in power of the people. And I hope if we speak with factual information and loud enough, we can effect some change. We just all need to come together, whether it’s coastal North Carolina or other states from the Gulf to Maine. We are spending an exorbitant amount of money on reinsurance, where if we just pooled half of that money together we could more than cover Katrina three times over. So if we can start communicating through the states and look at how we can better manage catastrophic risk, it would not only benefit any coastal resident but the inland states as well. Because when we suffer damage, it does affect the state of North Carolina. And we are a tremendous asset to the state. We do give more in taxes than we get back from the state. And I’m not running for office, but that did sound like a political campaign speech [laughs].
It’s funny because 80% of these houses are owned by people out of state. And you think about how many people in DC…
I know, and I get phone calls from them now saying, “What’s going on down there?” And I’m like, “Can you talk to the guy you know in congress?” Because this is pretty messed up and the only people who benefit are the insurance industry. The more they can drive home that there’s this huge catastrophic risk and we should be paying to that catastrophic risk every year, the better off they are, the more money they make. And when it comes down to when the catastrophic risk happens, as evident in New Jersey and New York, the federal government is going to have to step in and bail these people out. Just like Katrina. And that’s because insurance companies have backed away.
But they’re not making any less money or charging any less.
No. Now, when the investment market goes back up and interest rates go up, they’ll come in and there will be a money grab. So you’ll see access. You’ll see them actually writing policies. Right now, they’re not making money from the money we’re paying, plus they’ve got the risk. I understand business and economics. If it was my business, I’d do the same thing. ButSusan Valauri of Nationwide said their largest one day loss in the state of North Carolina ever was from a hail storm last year; not Irene, but a hail storm in central North Carolina. You get rocks pelting a densely populated area, you get tremendous damage.
But their rates won’t go up?
Probably not. But what I don’t understand, is if the rate bureau already got their hand slapped and were told their methodology is illegal in the dwelling filing findings of fact, why did they use the same methodology in the homeowners insurance rate filing? Why did they use the same modeling? They included more information, but it was the same formula. And if they’ve already said this where we have problems in the dwelling rate filing, are they even going to give the Department of Insurance an opportunity to conclude our homeowners’ rates should be less? I don’t think they’re gong to have this hearing. I think they’re either going to pull this rate filing or the insurance commissioner is going to reach a settlement.
What do you mean by ‘pull’ the rate filing?
That means they withdraw the rate filing. They have the option to do that and they’d come back with another rate filing. Or he can reach a settlement agreement with the rate bureau. And if he reaches a settlement agreement, we don’t have any access to how thy reached the settlement. So if he holds a hearing and determines the rates should go down, all the rate bureau has to do is file an appeal and he’ll say, “Well, I’m helping you out here, rather than go through an appeal and go to court.” All the rate bureau has to do is file an appeal and it’ll force the commissioner into a settlement rather than risk the full rates going into effect. And all you had do was read the first page of this order of the hearing and it’s like the rate bureau is just using a fraudulent document: “Filing is not clear, concise, internally consistent or readily understandable….pervasive lack of documentation, explanation and justification to both the data used as well as the procedures and methodologies used . . .suffers from significant deficiencies… the data is so questionable that a proper evaluation of this filing, including its various components and methodologies is obstructed.” This was their order to hold a public hearing on the homeowners insurance rate filing and it’s basically saying everything that we’ve been saying: that the whole system is flawed.
And it’s more flawed toward us?
Well, they say it’s a 30% increase across the state, but if Charlotte is currently paying $344 per $75,000 worth of territory they asked for an 8.5 % increase, which would be a difference of 29 dollars. Our difference is $414 .
And if you have $300k home, you multiply that times four.
More like three and half because a portion of that is fixed expenses that are added to each policy. But it’s pretty close to four times. And if you’re in for full peril the Beach Plan, you’re getting charged 15% extra.
But I asked the Department of Insurance for the historical rate history for every territory in the state of NC. They could go back to 1993. So before 1993, it was $550 on the Outer Banks. From 1993 to 2009 it went from $578 to $1379. Now they want $1793. So that’s 300 and some percent increase in that time period. In Charlotte in 1993 they were paying $351. In 2009 after the rate increase went into effect, it went down to $344. So where is the increase in building cost and all that?
And insurance is business and they’re in business to make money. Okay, fine. But should we be looking into treating it more like a utility? I’ve been pushing for some sort of state catastrophe pool discussion for some time, becase the entire state is at risk of catastrophe; the whole state is at risk of hurricane damage. Why not a state wide hurricane deductible? Why not take that money we’re spending on reinsurance and allocate it to a catastrophe pool and keep the money in the state of North Carolina and invest it in the state of North Carolina? Should we look at a statewide catastrophe pool — a multi state catastrophe pool? Because when you start looking at premiums, since 2006, an estimated $8 to $20 billion per year was collected in premiums in these various state wind pools and the majority went to pay for reinsurance. And if we kept that money and put it in a fund, it makes more sense.
When you think about insurance, everyone always says, “What if I took this same money and just stockpiled it in case something happens?” It may not make sense for one house, but it might for a whole state because you spread the risk out and you get a giant lump sum.
A lot of retirees who own their homes do that. And this year, Senate Bill 836 , said the rate bureau has to come up with a rate or some sort of form for someone if they want to buy a fire policy and they can self-insure for wind. But another question I have is: how can these insurance companies be so broke and pay for all this advertising. Who sponsors the stadiums? Banks, cable companies. insurance.
Farm Bureau Live.
And who’s paying for all the lobbyists? Every time we walk in the door to a representative, four lobbyists walk out And the profit even last year for insurance companies, even with all the tornados in Missouri and hurricane Irene, total catastrophic losses in the US totaled $35 billion. They added more than that to their policy holder surplus last year. So when you hear them say “We’ve had catastrophic losses and rates need to go up” they still added all this money. And that’s where I said, “Isn’t hat money supposed to cover those losses.” And the insurance guy said, “No that’s shareholder dividends.” The guy in Nationwide told me they had to show their shareholders a 10% profit every year.
And we’ve almost gotten to the point were you need to cut the profit out because they’ve gotten too greedy and we can’t pay to their level of what they need for profit. But if we took 18 counties and tried to create a mutual insurance company with the premiums that are being paid now, we could take the Beach Plan money — in the bill in 2009, Marc Basnight included in a provision that says if a group were to take over the operations of the beach plan and a separate entity was created, the assets would transfer. Wouldn’t you like start a mutual insurance company with $700 million in the surplus fund? Yeah, you might have to buy some reinsurance to begin with, but we could work with the state to look at tax-free bonding as an opinion that we could borrow if there were a worst -case scenario. But build up that pot of money — which we’re not doing now because we spend so much on reinsurance; we’re not growing our surplus. The more we can grow our surplus the better off we are in terms of the health and stability of our beach plan. Which we’re not doing because we’re spending so much for reinsurance, which is based on an overstated projection for losses.
But wouldn’t it be great to think like that? How can we better manage catastrophic risk? The unfortunate thing about having a mutual insurance company for eastern North Carolina is you’re not spreading risk to lower it for everybody. You’re still putting the burden here. But we can’t continue to see increases here like we’re seeing here to make up for the cost of reinsurance and profit. And then the insurance companies may come back an say, “Now you’re interfering with competition — because the state cannot adopt any law or regulation that will interfere with the free market or competition — but my argument back is they don’t want to write here anyway. There’s no market. They’re not writing policies.
So expressing support for that idea may be one thing people can do to change things.
Well, there has to be some better way. Because if we get hit with these increases in 2013, are we going to see redevelopment? Are we see people come in to invest? Are we going to attract employees? Are we going to attract small business owners? Or keep them? So we either all get on the same page and start talking about managing catastrophic risk. Because the bottom line is we’re getting to the point where we’re going to be unable to afford the product. And we’re going to force people out of their home. We’re going to greatly affect investments.
But if you can save someone $500 a year in premiums or $2000 on their deductible, that’s the way to go at it first. Because with the politics behind all this — with the enormous mount of money being spent by the insurance lobby — we are fighting an enormous uphill battle to effect change. And if you want to take the discussion beyond the scope of insurance, it’s really: where is the state’s commitment to coastal North Carolina. Because if you want to know the consumer perspective of coastal residents in North Carolina, it’s this: we’re backed into a corner and we’ve got nowhere to go. And no way out.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
STOP. RIGHT. THERE.
The law says license and sobriety checkpoints are allowed so long as they’re reasonable. We asked the ACLU to help define “reasonable.”
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” — 4th Amendment, U.S. Constitution Bill of Rights
Clearly, our founding fathers never had to drive down Colington Road on NFL Sunday. And while the issue of highway safety and drunk driving is every Outer Banker’s concern — especially during the holiday season — it only takes a couple winter roadblocks to wonder: how is it Constitutional to randomly make drivers stop and prove they’re not breaking the law? As a Racial Justice Attorney with the ACLU of North Carolina, Raul Pinto’s job includes protecting civil liberties during the execution of roadblocks, license checks and police stops in general. We asked him to help clarify the state and federal statutes so both residents and officers know their legal limits.
MILEPOST: What is the ACLU’s purpose and what is your role inside the organization?
RAUL PINTO: The ACLU is a membership-based organization that works on defending civil rights and civil liberties. My job in particular was to study the increment of checkpoints in minority communities and that includes protecting civil liberties during the execution of those operations. And also, it entails the studies and stories from racial profiling. And also working from a legal standpoint to ameliorate those problems and organizing grassroots efforts to address the issue.
So what are the constitutional rights we’re working with? And how did roadblocks go from unconstitutional to constitutional? Because I’d say 50 years ago, people would have a big problem with this concept. Or even your average tea partier today would see it as a major constitutional breach to ask people to randomly prove their not breaking the law.
So when you’re talking about check points — and it’s important for people to know that even a brief slowdown to show your license actually constitutes a seizure under the law — that would bring the stop under the 4th Amendment, which states that any seizure has to be reasonable. So, then you’re starting to look at proof that the manner in which these checkpoints are being conducted is unreasonable. And that can take on different meanings. For example, you can look at the number checkpoints that were being conducted. We conducted an investigation in Winston Salem where the police department admitted they had conducted 244 checkpoints. And specifically those checkpoints were concentrated in minority areas. So we think that that number — concentrated on minority areas — would make those checkpoints unreasonable. And there other ways hat you can argue that.
Now the one thing is that, the Supreme Court — in a phrase in passing, really —stated that check points can be done. And check points to check licenses can be conducted. But usually what goes into that analysis is that the state, or in this case the police department, must have a public interest to conduct these checkpoints. So while they do have the authority to do them –not only under federal law but north Carolina Statues also grant police departments the authority to conduct checkpoints — they still must comport with the standards of reasonableness, so you can’t be held up for more than you could be for what the original checkpoint is for.
So, how it appears — at least anecdotally to the casual witness of the past 30 years — is first you had sobriety checkpoints. The idea being we need to stop drunk driving, particularly around the holidays. Those seem to be more announced though. And that has sort of migrated into he license checkpoint where simultaneously the car cruiser runs your plates from the side of the road. Is that basically the chronology of what seems like a whittling away of what’s considered to be your constitutional rights?
To a certain extent you’re right. The North Carolina law regulating the way checkpoints are supposed to be conducted actually started as guidelines for DWI checkpoints. And then the NC legislature figured out that they were also conducting other types of checkpoints, like license checkpoints, and they broadened the statue to encompass all types of checkpoints and not just DWI checkpoints. So yeah you can see the progression in police practices by the way the statute was written and amended.
One argument I’ve heard is the rational behind allowing the checkpoints is driving isn’t a right, it’s a privilege. So you effectively volunteer to give up a certain degree of your rights when you get a license. So does this fall under the right to privacy or….?
No, it falls under the 4th Amendment, an unreasonable search and seizure. And when you talk about the racial disparities that inherently occur in some cities while executing these checkpoints, then you’re looking at 14th amendment equal protection claims. So why is one resident of one neighborhood being asked to show his license multiple times a week when a resident of a Caucasian neighborhood is not? So you’re looking at that legal theory as well. But in the cases you’re describing I think it’s more of the 4th Amendment: why do we have to go through this repeatedly in order to get to our homes and places of work and what not?
We have a lot of sobriety and license checks here. A year ago someone said to me he’d never seen so many license and sobriety checks — roadblocks and just general police stops. Is there a difference legally between a license check and sobriety check and what the police can legally do?
What happens usually is that when you have a sobriety checkpoint the law enforcement agencies will apply a much stricter standard — which means they’ll have a breathalyzer test ready, a mobile unit usually at the check point — so therefore it takes more planning and many more officers. Now, a license check, in contrast, is something that can be done by only a couple of officers. There’s no great planning required. They’re supposed to be authorized by superior officers, although we’ve seen in different investigations that that’s not always the case. And they can happen anytime, anywhere. And the procedure that will be followed is officers are supposed to be stopping cars in a systematic fashion. And that means they’re supposed to stop every vehicle or every second vehicle, every third vehicle, so they’re supposed to use a pattern of stopping to check driver’s licenses. And that also means that not only are they checking for licenses, they’re checking for other violations of traffic laws.
So registration or proof or insurance or anything you’re usually asked for when stopped by an officer.
That’s exactly right. And something that does occur is — let’s say a driver comes to a regular license checkpoint and the officer has reasonable suspicion to believe that you’ve been drinking — then they can do the breathalyzer test and check you for a DWI as well. So the gamut of violations they can check during a license checkpoint is many. It’s the entire spectrum of violations of traffic laws.
I think that’s what troubles people most. If you were to ask a lot of people, they would say what it basically comes down to is fishing for violations. Even if the explanation is “we’re just making sure everyone’s up to date,” the motivation is to just to cast a wide net and see what they can come up with. Especially around here in the offseason where we have a lot less people and a pretty high number of police officers.
And you’re bringing up a very good point. Because while they can check for violations of traffic laws, the checkpoints themselves cannot be utilized for general crime control. For example, police officers cannot set up a checkpoint in order to investigate drug crimes. So they can’t set up a check point to search your vehicle for drugs. And that has been decided by the Supreme Court of the United States.
But what seems to happen is — or at least from what I understand — if they can set a series of circumstances in motion, they can get to that point. So, asking a series of questions during the license check or simply asking for consent to search, then they can make it legal to take that step from, “Let me see your ID” to “What’s in your car?”
So if it’s a traffic enforcement checkpoint — which would be to check for your driver’s license or seatbelt violations — the length of time the driver is stopped should not exceed the purpose of that checkpoint. For example, if it’s a seatbelt checkpoint the officer should be able to check to see if you’re wearing your seatbelt, check for your license, registration or other papers, and if all is in compliance they should let you go on your way. And so if they’re asking for consent then you might have an argument that the checkpoints actually are not for the purpose of conducting a seatbelt check, but rather they are for the purpose of going on a fishing expedition, or ascertaining that other crimes are not being violated, which will then take them from the ambit of being allowed by federal law to not being allowed by federal law. So you really have to take a look at what are the practices the police are using when they conduct these checkpoints.
And you’re touching on another issue as well, which is consent. And unfortunately, consent is the catch-all. If a driver gives consent to search the vehicle then the police can do so. So it’s important for the community to know that when an officer asks for consent, you as a driver and as a citizen always have the right to deny that consent. So that’s important to know, as well.
Then the old argument often becomes, if you have nothing to hide why won’t you consent? And then it comes to, “We’ll just get the dogs.’ How do you maintain your rights without stepping into that trap? Or without appearing disrespectful?
And that’s a very tricky balance. And the interesting thing is, the more educated a citizen is when it comes to their rights, the more they know they have the authority to deny consent, the less likely it is the officer will use that same tactic in the future. I’ll give you an example. Fayetteville recently had racial disparities in the amount of consent searches — not checkpoints, but consent searches in general. So in some instances African Americans were being searched at rates of 3 to one to Caucasian drivers. The city council took several measures to ameliorate that problem, one of which was actually the use of a consent form, which basically says that if you’re going to ask for consent from a driver, the driver has to put it in writing that he or she has given that consent. And the consent form also states and informs the driver that they have the right to say no. Once that form was implemented the ratios went down to about one-to one. So the importance of that is that when people know their rights, they can actually help shape police policy and police practice. So it was a very interesting example but it shows you that when people know their rights, they’re more likely to exercise the rights they have. But, as you’re saying, it’s a very tricky balance because officers will certainly utilize certain tactics to obtain consent.
But the one thing the driver has to know, they don’t need reasonable suspicion to ask you for consent — but they do need reasonable suspicion to search your car without consent. And so without that, the officers would be in violation [if they search your car without consent and reasonable suspicion]. And, also, the stop cannot be prolonged any longer than it should have taken for the original purpose of the stop. So it’s very tricky and sometimes full of legalese. But when people know that right, they can help shape police practices and police conduct.
And so, for example, if you’re sober and your car’s clean, the best thing someone can do in this situation is — instead of saying, go ahead an search it because I want o get out of here — is to push back and say, “No.” And force them to get the dog and force them to go through the process and force them to come up empty-handed?
Well, I would phrase it a bit differently. I would be forceful in asserting my rights and the rights given to me under the constitution.
It’s funny, because it’s not necessarily a racial thing, but here they frequently do checkpoints in and out of Colington. And the Outer Banks isn’t vey racially diverse to begin with — I think 3% of our community is black, maybe 12% Hispanic— so most of the people living in Colington aren’t of a different race, but you could argue the bulk are of a different socioeconomic background than some of the wealthier beach neighborhoods. And it’s also the county, instead of a town, so that could be part of it. But it’s pretty much synonymous with roadblocks. Especially, compared to more affluent areas. Is there any precedent for socioeconomic bias? Or is that inherently harder to prove than race?
Unfortunately, when it comes to discrimination law, socioeconomic status has not been given very high priority. But what I will say, is that in our work in Winston Salem, while there were racial disparities, I think there were also socioeconomic disparities as well. and a lot of our work there was sort of grassroots, going to elected officials and trying to impart change that way. So I do encourage folks in these communities to go out to their elected officials and talk to them about the problem. And if they feel affected, like their rights are being violated, by all means contact the ACLU and their elected officials so they have it on their radar and they see what’s going on in these communities and why these checkpoints are being located where they are.
So what are the rights of the driver? Can he refuse a search? Can he refuse to show ID? I know if you refuse to blow in a breathalyzer you’re automatically penalized, but what’s the rules for checkpoints in general? If you turn around, does it mean, “Come get me?”
Well, that’s an interesting question. I think when it comes to a checkpoint, the best thing for a driver to do is — first of all — remain calm and cooperative with law enforcement. If they ask for you license and registration, provide the officer with them. Because, as I was telling you before, law enforcement agencies in North Carolina have the authority and the right to conduct checkpoints. So, that’s point number one. Turning around from a checkpoint should not necessarily be reason for an officer to follow, but it does come into effect. And what we’ve seen in other communities is they’ll have a checkpoint set up and not far from there will be a pursuit vehicle who will follow other vehicles that turn around. So while it shouldn’t be, in practice it does. An when it comes to consent searches you can always deny them consent to search your vehicle. That is your right. And is not only established in federal constitutional law but in the statute and the law that allows officers to conduct consent searches. And so you have that option. Now, there are certain exceptions to that rule when an officer can search your vehicle without consent and without a warrant. But the general rule is that if an officer asks you for consent, you can deny consent.
When it comes to the breathalyzer test, that gets a little more nuanced, but the bottom line is that a person who has been stopped for DWI or when the officer has suspicion that the person has been drinking, the person cannot refuse a breathalyzer test.
So, one of those situations may be if the officer says, “I think I smell weed,” they can search your car. Do they have to ask for consent? Because, obviously, ‘I think I smell something” is pretty subjective and it could be used as an excuse. Does something have to be visible?
You know, it really is situation by situation. I’ve seen cases, some racial profiling cases, where the officer’s reason for a search was this reason that he smelled marijuana although nothing was found. So that’s one of the things we’re going to be highlighting very soon with the racial profiling campaign that we’re launching. But it’s really a subjective approach, so it’s really difficult to tell you what reason the officer may give you. It becomes impossible for me to anticipate what it would be. But, for example, if you have something that looks criminal – if it is in plain view- that might be reason for the officer to search you. And there are others. But it’s really a case-by-case basis.
The other response you hear is, “We’ll just get the dogs.” How is that not an invasion of privacy? Why is that upheld — or is it? And how effective are dogs anyway?
Unfortunately, dog searches have been upheld because the dog is not supposedly going into your vehicle from the get go, the dog will basically sniff air, and supposedly the air is not private. So, it’s really a technicality. And therefore, if the dog comes up with a positive — which you never really know what that positive is unless you’ve been trained to work with the animals — it creates for the officer the reasonable suspicion in order to search the vehicle without consent.
But remember, the officer cannot prolong the search, again, any longer than what it should’ve taken for the original purpose of the stop. So let’s say they stop you for a seat belt, you were wearing it, you’re on your way. And if, for example, they mention it will take them an hour and a half to get the dog so you better consent because you don’t want to wait that long, that’s something that’s violating your rights. The dog search per se i snot necessarily violating your rights and they have been upheld, but again the search cannot prolong the purpose for your original stop. So people should be aware of that. And should write down as much information as they can remember once they’ve been subjected to this kind of stop.
That’s a good point. Because a lot of times, they say, “We can just wait for the dogs.” But then you can say, “If you don’t produce a dog in the next five minutes, I’m outta here.” Is that what would you say? Maybe not in that tone…[laughs]
Well, I would definitely avoid that tone. And a lot of these rights you can assert them, the officer’s gonna end up doing the things they’re trained to do, and these sort of things can go into a complaint with the internal affairs department. I know some communities have lost trust in their police departments, but it’s a good tool at least to put your voice in writing. You can definitely let our organization know so we can keep track of these practices and see what can be done. Either from a legal standpoint or from a grassroots community standpoint.
The other thing is the persistent questioning. I mean, after the fifth time they say, “Are you sure you haven ‘been drinking?” is there a point where can you say, “Are we done here?”
I think it’s always important to ask the officer — after you’ve been asked a series of questions — “Am I free to leave?” And that’s really the key question. Because if the officer says no, you’re going from a mere traffic detention to a possible seizure of your person. And that triggers more constitutional protections than that of just a traffic stop. So you can always ask — and you should always that — after you’ve answered the sort of routine questions: Where are are you going? Is everything okay? Is this your car? After those questions have been asked, the trigger question is: Am I free to leave? And if the answer is no, it’s possible you’re being detained and you’re triggering more constitutional protections.
What about the rights of the passenger? Assuming you’re not sitting in the car with a beer in your hand, are you protected?
In North Carolina there is no passenger identification law. So you are not required to give your identification to the officer, unless the officer has reasonable suspicion to believe you’ve been part of a crime. And so the officer should not be asking passengers for identification unless there are those circumstances. However, a lot of officers do not necessarily know this, so they don’t practice that very well, so they’ll ask the passenger anyways. So our recommendation is always — in order to avoid further trouble — that if passengers have that identification, they should just show it and that way you can comply with the officer’s request. But as far as having to do it, no you don’t have to do it. And North Carolina is one of the states where the law protects people. Unless the officers have reasonable suspicion to believe you’ve been in a crime.
So if it comes down to a search of the car and the driver, the passenger should be able to refuse and not be searched?
Right. And when it comes to a person’s frisking, I’d be hesitant to comment on that. Because, again, it really depends on a plethora of circumstances.
For example, if they think you have a weapon and you refuse, they’re going to get even more nervous…
Right and also there’s issues of probable cause, and the difference between probably cause and reasonable suspicion, so you’ll get into a whole lot of circumstances that I could spend a week talking about.
So in some ways, its’ better to comply to get through the situation. But then you follow up and say, “Look this is what happened, and this is the chronology of what happened, and this is why I feel it’s unreasonable.”
And this is something also for the community to know about. Let’s say when internal affairs for a certain police department gets one complaint, they may be less likely to do something than if they get 10 complaints. And obviously the more complaints they have the more likely they’re going to see a problem. And also they’re going to see community concern. And that’s the same thing with our organization as well. One complaint may show me that it happened once. But if I have 10 complaints from a certain community then I know it could be a systemic problem that needs to be addressed.
Is it just a matter of just taking down copious notes after the fact? Are there certain things they need to be looking for? What do you do if you do feel like you were unreasonably detained?
If there’s a traffic ticket involved and they believe that they were unjustly ticketed they should definitely contact an attorney. Specifically one that deals with traffic issues. That’s my number one recommendation. Second, is try to take copious notes and as soon as the stop is over, write down as much information as you can remember. Definitely include the police department or law enforcement agency that conducted the stop. If it’s a checkpoint, try to remember how many officers and patrol cars were present. And if you’re stopped during a checkpoint or a random traffic stop, you can always try and remember the name of the officer. If you’re given a ticket you’ll have it. But make a copy of the ticket. We’ve heard in some communities that once a person’s paid a ticket they were only given a receipt. I would recommend they also make a copy of the ticket for their records, as well. So record, record, record. And get as much info down as possible. Get it in writing. And then, as I said, you can take that information to internal affairs. Or to a non-profit organization like ours. And keep the conversation going about this issue. Talk to your neighbors; talk to your friends. Find out whether this has happened to others, that will help show if it’s a single event or a practice of your law enforcement agency.
Definitely around here, you hear a lot about people getting stopped randomly after midnight, being asked to consent to search, and just complying because they’re tired from work. But it sounds like if you do have the time and inclination, the better response would be to go through the motions so they come up empty and establish a pattern of it not being so beneficial to the department to keep doing it.
That’s exactly right.
Besides the obvious — don’t drink and drive, don’t break the law — is there anything people can do to avoid being stuck in these situations? Or once you’re on the road, are you at the mercy of law enforcement?
You know the traffic code — not only in North Carolina but in every state — is so intricate that at any given moment you could be breaking two traffic laws at one time. So it really becomes the discretion of the officer as to what type of violation they’re going to stop you for. But again, maintain calm and be as courteous as possible. That’s something we advocate, and be cooperative with police officers as well. It might lessen the tension of a very stressful situation.
Anything else you’d like to say?
I think we’ve covered it all. Just remind the community that if they feel their rights have been violated to try an remember and write adown as much as possible. And to contact the ACLU. Definitely you have to report it to someone because if these stories go untold there’s nothing you can do to shape those unconstitutional practices.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
BOB VS. BOB
In a political season rife with partisan friction, the county battle between Woodard and Muller is looking surprisingly friendly
This election season will be the most brutal ever. Or so you would think from the national debate. And, honestly, when we first asked Bob Woodard and Bob Muller to discuss the race for Dare County’s only open seat (District 2), we were hoping to see a little blood fly. After all, Muller is a Democrat, Woodard a Republican. As KDH Commissioner, Woodard said ‘yes’ to Lowe’s; Mayor Muller helped shape Nags Head’s ‘no box stores’ vision. But instead of two party prizefighters striking partisan blows, we found two cordial candidates with striking similar views. Both are strongly pro-beach nourishment, pro-beach tourism and pro-beach access. And both see major issues coming down the pike, particularly the impending property tax revaluation. (In 2013, the county will adjust its rates to keep the necessary revenue coming in, so while home values maybe down, peoples’ bills will actually increase.) Most notably, both believe in a governing philosophy that puts following personal values over bending to public opinion. Maybe that’s why they share such strong mutual respect. As Woodard notes: “Bob said, it and I’ll say it: no matter what happens in this election, Dare County will get a great representative.”
The following interview represents the full conversation of the edited version that printed in Outer Banks Milepost 1.3 Fall ‘12 issue. — Ed
What made us think of talking to you two — because obviously, we’d love to talk to every candidate — was the fact this is the only open seat. And you both have served for a long time in your respective towns. Commissioner Woodard, you’re still serving on the KDH board. Mayor Woodard, when did you leave the Nags Head board?
BOB MULLER: I was an elected official in Nags Head for 20 years, from 1985 to 2005. And I was the mayor from January of 2000 to December of 2005. Since then I’ve work on a number of community boards: the Outer Banks Community Development corporation — I chair that board — the Community Foundation Board, the Eure Outer Banks Art Center, which is a group trying to create a local cultural center. And I’m working with another group that’s trying to access some broadband fiber that’s being installed in the area and drive it into unserved and underserved households of Northeastern North Carolina. It’s called Northeast Rural Broadband.
So it’s still public service, but not in a elected position. Can you both of you tell me what motivated you to get into in public service to begin with and how that carries over to running for Dare Co.?
BOB WOODARD: In my case I used to come down as a young boy with my parents back in the 50s. And I fell in love with the place. I loved it so much I said, “I hope one day I’ll be able to live down there.” And I was fortunate enough in 1968 to be able to purchase a piece of property in Kill Devil Hills — for a lot cheaper than what it cost today [laughs] — but I built a little beach cottage in 1970 and came down on the weekends. And when both my boys were grown and married, my wife and I were able to sell our home in Chesapeake. As a matter of fact, she said, “I’ll give it two years.” Well, I can’t drag her away now. But it’s a lot different living here than it is coming down on the weekends. But in 1995, I believe, we moved down here permanently and I commuted back and forth to Norfolk until I had 30 years with a firm. And last January I left there and went to work for Towne Bank, Towne Insurance. And during my time down here I got involved with the town. I served on the Streets and Special Projects Committee, and then I served on the planning board, and then I ran for public office. And I’m in my third term at KDH.
But I look at it as paying my civic rent so to speak. I feel like if you live in a community and care about that community you do what you can to make it a good community to live in. And I don’t have all the answers as far as what’s right or wrong. But what I do have is the experience in KDH and the willingness to listen to folks and try and do a good job and do what’s best for the town. And that’s what I’ll bring to the county side. That experience and the ability to work hard and try to do what’s right in Dare County. And Mike Johnson chose not to run so I felt like the Republican Party needed someone with some background and experience and someone who cared, and so I threw my name in the ringer. I think Bob said it, and I’ll say it: No matter what happens in this election, Dare Co. will have a great representative in either one of us. This won’t be a “Bob you’re totally wrong on what you’re thinking, I disagree with what you’re saying 100%” [campaign]. This will be a very positive campaign from both of our sides. I’m pretty confident in that.
Which is interesting to hear, because nationally the two parties are far from friendly.
WOODARD: Well, it is a partisan race, but we don’t bring those platforms to the table.
MULLER: But there’s a lot of folks — I being one of them — who would like to see the county go to a non-partisan format and get those partisan politics [out] because they don’t define — Republican and Democrat at the county level — don’t define candidates particularly. You’ve got small government Democrats, you’ve got some Republicans who see the need for tax increases and more programs. So when you look at the board, you don’t see Republicans and Democrats, you see seven people working really hard to do what’s best for the citizens of Dare County. And I agree with Bob. I would hope people will give us the opportunity to talk about what is the future of Dare County. Bob and I aren’t going to get caught up in name-calling and the silly stuff. And I hope the people will let this election be a debate about the issues that will face Dare County over the next 20 years.
But to get back to your initial question. I moved here in 1977. I was living I Ohio. I went into a record and stereo store and met a woman who’d been coming down here on vacation — these stories all start with ‘I met a woman’ [laughs] — and we came down and rented a place in South Nags Head for about a year. Nine hundred square feet with a wife and two kids. In 1979 we bought a house in North Ridge. I almost bought in Kill Devil Hills, so it’s interesting to think what might have been if that had happened. But I bought in Nags head. And I looked around when I was in my early 30s and Nags Head was about 60% built-out, and there were a lot of decisions to be made about how the community grew. And I decided I wanted to be a part of those decisions. So, like Bob, I got appointed to the board of adjustments, planning board. In 1985 I ran for the board of commissioners and got to work with a lot of people in figuring out what Nags Head was going to be when it grew up. And the Nags Head vision statement talks about family vacation tourism, predominately single-family homes. We’ve sort of gotten there. And 20 years is along time to serve so I felt it was time to get out. I retired from 30 years at the post office a little bit after that.
But I love Dare County and I wanted to help in the community so I found some activities that let me do that in the non-profit realm. And now, this opportunity has come up and I see the same question in the county board: we need a county board that is looking to the future. That is talking about the big issues that are going to define us over the next 20 years. Transportation. Water Quality. Our beach quality and our access to beaches. The county board spends a lot of time — and rightfully so – not tripping over financial roadblocks that are being set in its way. And to some extent, bureaucratic roadblocks, talking about access problems on Hatteras Island. We don’t have that big overarching vision; we don’t have that big consistent community theme. And I hope to help the county move toward that having a consistent vision of where is it that that we’re going to go. I also believe the county needs commissioners who will work hard and I will do that. I’m a little flabbergasted they passed a $100 million budget without a budget workshop. And I assure that’s not the way we did our municipal budgets.
WOODARD: No it’s not.
MULLER: And that won’t happen if I’m elected. I think if people look at my Nags Head experience they’ll find that that I was a pretty hard working elected official. And I’ll bring the same thing to the citizens of Dare County.
What do you see being the pressing issues then? Mayor Muller, you just mentioned water quality, transportation. I’m assuming the revaluation is another.
WOODARD: I think there are a number of issues. And Bob’s right. You pass a budget that huge without work shops — both of us have experience on both of our boards, we have a number of work shops before we take a hard look at passing a budget. I see the reval in 2013 is going to be a huge issue; I want to be a part of that. I want to have some input. I can’t give you a definite answer right now because I need to get in there and study it but I want to be a part of that. I don’t want to continue to grow government. I feel like in these economic times that we’re in we have to be very careful about growing government. Another pressing issue is potential consolidation of services where it can happen. And Bob’s aware of where I’m going with that. We had a great relationship with Nags Head. They needed a north end address for a fire department; we needed a south end. And we were going to do something. And we had it all put together to build a facility and share services. And it so happened they were able to put the beach nourishment deal together. But those some of the things we need to look at is sharing some services from the county aspect. I think that’s’ critical. But I would submit that we need to continue take a hard look at government in terms of growing it. We need to keep those moratoriums going in terms of positions — unless it s case of pubic safety, fire and police. Not looking to cut anyone’s position, but certainly consolidate where we can.
The other issue I’m concerned about is our retail sales. I serve in my second term now on the visitors bureau and our occupancy and our restaurant receipts are up — slightly — but he retail is down. And we need to bring in community leaders and bring in the experts in that field to see what we can do. Folks are coming down here by the droves. It’s been a great summer. But they’re not spending on the retail side and we need to take a look at that.
I also think the board needs to be futuristic in thinking of what we can do to bring — obviously we can’t bring [big] industry in here — but there are the IT type services we could bring in that can help with our employment. And I think we’re a great site for that. So those are my concerns and I want to be a part of it.
MULLER: Short term, revaluation is a huge issue. I almost don’t want to even call it an issue, because there’s nothing anyone is going to do about it. Property values are going to drop — about 40%. And frankly there’s no way that some people are not going to see their tax bills go up. And you have to understand, the difference between the total amount of money used to run government — which is how much moneys’ generated by taxes — and your individual tax bill, revaluation simply affects the redistribution of those costs. And without a doubt, people are going to see substantial increases. I expect my individual taxes to go up to double. I live in modest home in Nags Head Cove. It appreciated, but not as much as the oceanfront properties did in the run up to the real estate bubble. Likewise, it hasn’t declined as much. So my share of the pie is gonna be bigger. And that’s what [revaluation] is.
There are some things we can do to ameliorate it. We need to start charging realistic EMS fees. Our EMS fees are pegged to the Medicare minimums; they need to go up about 1.5 times that. But I think we have to be careful about how we look at our budgets. There’s been a five year salary freeze in dare county employees — plus they’ve seen their health benefits reduced 401k contributions reduced — and as our economy recovers we’re gonna see some of our better employees go find a job someplace else because they can do much better. I was talking to a woman the other day; she’s involved in water quality testing. She’s got a degree. She’s been with the county five years and she’s had one raise. And she likes working in the public sector, but she could take herself into the private sector and make double. So we need to think about how we take care of our employees.
And there’s another threat that’s on the horizon and that’s insurance. Take your tax bill and put it next to your homeowner’s insurance and tell me which one’s the bigger threat. That’s an issue we need to get involved in short term and long term. Homeowners insurance is a threat in terms of cost and availability. Imagine an Outer Banks where banks won’t lend because people can’t get affordable homeowners insurance. Imagine an Outer Banks where homeowners insurance costs are 3 or 4 or 5 times that tax bill, and what those rents have to be — and can we be competitive in that family vacation market when our homeowners are forced to charge more just to break even?
Those are some of the threats that are out there: access to beaches, both on Hatteras Island and on the northern end. Making sure folks can get to the water. But it’s also important that we look at things like wastewater — we pump 12 million gallons per day into the sand north of Oregon Inlet. We do it in a virtually unmanaged system. I’m not an advocate for central sewage; I happen to be in the North Carolina On-Site Wastewater Hall of Fame. I’m a believer in on-site wastewater. But we can manage it better as far as helping people replace failed systems. Look for systems that are underperforming, old systems. we know are too close to the water table and help folks raise those systems through grants, loans, what have you.
Transportation: the biggest single negative in all the visitor bureau surveys is traffic. How are we going to manage that? I don’t have the answers, but we’re smart enough as a community to start working toward finding and implementing those solutions. And we have to do it together. And one of things I want focus on is we are one county: if you’re not catching crabs in Stumpy Point, the waitress in Kitty Hawk is not getting tips, and the kids in Buxton aren’t getting new school books because the taxes aren’t paid. It all links together. And you cant’ talk about transportation on the Hatteras Island and not talk about it on the north beaches. DOT wants to move four cemeteries in East Lake, and you can’t talk about traffic and travel on that road and not have it be part of a plan that brings folks over the causeway and up and down the beaches. Because we’re one county and we have one future.
WOODARD: And Bob’s right. And this is not a slam at he current board in Dare. We have one or two functions a year and we talk abut what needs to be done. And I think we’re way beyond that stage now and I think we have to have a board that’s proactive, that’s going to come out and work with the individual towns and let’s put some goals and objectives in place and let’s work toward those. Let’s make those things happen. And I don’t see that happening — at least from a standpoint of making it happen sooner than later. And I think we need to have those workshops and we need to work together. And you make that commitment on that board and you take it to the highest level and use very source and every revenue to make it happen. That’s important. And I don’t’ see that as much from this existing board as I would like to see. I know if Bob was there, or I, either one, we’ll both push that idea very hard.
We have some huge issues on Hatteras Island with beach driving — as you know. We finally have a senator who’s stepped up to the plate to help us. We have another huge issue with our local fishermen trying to get out of Oregon Inlet. It’s ridiculous we can’t get the federal funds or the funding to make that happen so these people can make a living. That’s our history. We don’t want to see that disappear. The other thing about this board, if I’m elected, I’m going to push very hard for buy local. I don’t care if it’s seafood or groceries, whatever you buy, buy local. And quite honestly I see some of that leaving the county – I see I from an insurance standpoint, and I’m in the business. We have businesses that don’t buy local; residents that don’t buy local. And we need to find a competitive situation for those people to buy local.
And Bob said it earlier about the insurance rates. I’m in the same boat, I’m on the west side, I’ll probably see mine double. But we need a voice. We’ve got Willo Kelly who works very, very hard and has done a fabulous job to fight those rates, but we need some power behind us to make that happen. The rest of the state is not subsidizing Dare County by any stretch of the imagination. And those are all key issues that I know both of us will work hard on.
MULLER: Bob mentioned Oregon Inlet – or should I say Oregon Outlet, which is how it ought to be known. And it’s important for commercial fishing but I’ll tell you what, if that inlet closes there are three places we’ve identified where an inlet is going to reopen: Whalebone Junction, Soundside Road, and old Nags Head Cove, where my house is. That’s just another example of we’re all one county. It’s not just an issue for fishermen in Wanchese or charter boat captains in Manteo. It’s an issue for all of us. Because if that inlet closes, water quality in the sound is going to decrease, and an inlet’s going to open someplace else. Possibly where we don’t want it. So the folks in Southern Shores who aren’t concerned with Oregon Inlet, it should be a huge concern to them. Because it could devastate the whole county and the economy.
You bring up an interesting point. Because in some ways, the Outer Banks is such a tight community; in others, we’re so spread out it’s hard to engage people.
WOODARD: That’s right. And [sometimes they feel like] if it’s not a problem in my backyard, I’m not gonna worry about it. But I was on the KDH board when Nags Head had their beach nourishment plan. We submitted to the county that we wanted a certain amount of funds, but we were willing to step back and not step on their toes so they could do beach nourishment. Quite honestly, we can’t afford to retreat. It’s not an option as far as I’m concerned. This is a barrier island, we need nourishment. Kill Devil Hills is working toward doing the same thing. And we’re gonna keep an eye on Nags Head’s project. And those were tough decisions that board had to make. But it’s critical that we protect those property owners and continue that same way of life that we’ve had down here for years and years. Because I love this place and plan on spending the rest of my life here. And I don’t plan on moving anywhere else. And it’s critical we save these barrier islands and do what we can to protect our livelihood.
MULLER: You were talking about getting people involved. And certainly there are enormous challenges in getting citizens involved. And they’ve doubled in the past couple of years because everyone’s working two jobs. But we have some tools we can use. We have social engagement tools — the internet, Facebook and social media — that are always shaping issue on the Outer Banks. And there was lots of discussion of this nourishment when the project was being done. And there are tools we can use as a community — with the county taking the lead — to have discussion about transportation and water quality and those kinds of things. And I hope we can get more engaged in that. There’s been some reticence by the county board to really engage the community and I feel like we have to do that to be successful. When you look around and you see successful communities, you see communities who have a shared vision of their future. If you ask someone in Seattle, they know they’re about coffee and they know they’re about Boeing and they know what they’re gong to do. We need that kind of vision on the Outer Banks. We need to pull together. There’s too many forces trying to split us up; whether ‘s single-issue extremists on Hatteras Island or whether it’s Republicans in the legislature who think the Northeastern North Carolina has gotten everything it’s wanted the past 20 years. Or whether it’s Virginia Beach and Myrtle Beach who would love to see us fail. But I could spend days talking about beach nourishment and you had a good piece in that issue with Bob Oakes.
Well I’m actually the biggest skeptic ever. But I’m also the first to say: give it five years and see what it does. But you both just mentioned Oregon Inlet as a major concern. One of the more popular complaints about the beach nourishment project was that all that sand was going to wash into Oregon Inlet. Now whether that’s enough sand to make a difference, I don’t know, but it’s a great window into how politics works. Because often one solution threatens another. So which project do you get behind? And, then how do you justify the money to keep dumping sand when times are so tight?
MULLER: The hot spots on Hatteras Island are relatively short — and one of the big advantages of Nags Head is it was a long project, and the longer project the better it works. Nourishment may not be the best answer on Hatteras island but we have to do something. We can’t just say we’ll let that cut stay forever, because a third of our occupancy tax revenues and a large part of our property values are down on Hatteras Island. Again, if Hatteras Island fails, all of us up here are going to pay. We’re gonna pay more in taxes and not have the quality of life that we want. I wish I knew what a silver bullet was but if we don’t start working on those problems now we’ll never get there.
The other part of that is access. If you build the most beautiful beach in the world , but if you can’t get to it it’s useless. And certainly the park service has limited access. But part of that response has to be to continuing to engage with the parks service on those decisions. The other part has to be providing our own access. Bob’s town, my town, have more access than most coastal counties have. I think my third meeting as a commissioner in 1985 we approved Harlow Street across from Jockey’s Ridge. And the town has continued to do accesses virtually every year using matching funds from the Division of Coastal Management, matching funds from the Visitors Bureau. The county has some property down in Rodanthe that they can look at improving. And we need to go down to the communities at the southern end of Hatteras Island and make sure we have as much access as we possibly can. And they serve as more than just places for people to go to the beach; they’re also social meeting points for communities. Where are you going to go surfing? Nags Head Town Hall for a while was a great break. At one point we’d come out in our coats and ties and there’d be people in wetsuits pulling boards off the rack. But that’s what accesses serve as. I see a lot f folks I know from my commit on the beach more an anywhere else.
WOODARD Like Bob said: we worked hard in KDH, we’ve got 29 beach accesses in 4.2 miles. Plus additional handicapped accesses. That’s important. And the Visitors Bureau is working hard to pump funds into Hatteras for that very reason. But it’s important to set those funds aside for those folks down there. Bob’s right: if we lose a third of that tax base, it’d be devastating; then the rest of the county has to belly up to that. I’m optimistic that with a new superintendent coming on board in the next 30 days. And I’m hopeful we’ll have a friendly conversation with the new superintendent.
What if it doesn’t’ happen? The biggest scare I got talking to Mike Murray was the decision was being made above the local level. That they were making national policy decisions. What then? Do you keep hammering? Because people are already going up to Carova because they think they can’t drive on the beach at all – which seems to indicate that the PR campaign is doing more damage than good. Because Carova doesn’t have the Point or Cove or other popular spots either.
WOODARD: Well the other idea of that is the fees are outrageous also. But I still believe in my heart that if you have the right people who are wiling to sit down and work together and come up with a solution that will help all — instead of drawing a line in the sand and not budging — we need to continue to do that. And I think the current chair of Dare County and the county manager have worked very, very hard to try and do that. And that’s why I’m trying to keep an optimistic view with a new superintendent.
MULLER: There are three strategies: the first is to engage with the park service with good science, to say these park closures are not necessary to meet the legislative mandate. The second is the legislative strategy that they’re currently pursuing with Warren Judge appearing the house and being successful and finding new friends in the senate. The Senator from West Virginia comes down to Hatteras all the time and is a great advocate. The third on is the one I talked about before: we’re gonna start building our own accesses so it’s as easy as possible to get to the beach. It may not get you to the Point, but you still get folk on the beach. And the negative publicity, there’s some of that, but I’m not as concerned about that as I am about folks throwing their hands up in the air.
Again: what do we want to see on Hatteras Island in 20 years? I don’t think that what we want to see is a beach we can’t get to. So we have to have a long-term strategy. But this issue doesn’t just affect Hatteras Island. We have people up here who say, “That’s just Hatteras Island, I can still go drive on Nags Head beaches in the fall or I can still drive on Carova.” Wrong answer. That part of the county is benefitting you and is important to you and part of our whole social fabric. You can’t just write off Hatteras Island. You have to stay engaged there as much as you stay engaged over on the mainland.
I’d argue people move here just for that stretch. And that’s the scariest part about the 50-year DOT plan for Bonner Bridge and Route 12. Because even the current plan kills 8 mile of Pea Island eventually. So what’s the plan for 50 years after that? Going to those meetings and looking at the long-term vision you start to see why Audubon pushed for the 17mile bridge, even if you don’t agree with it. Or, from an access standpoint, you start to see why nourishment was on the table even though the idea of the state signing up to pump sand non-stop seems far-fetched, as well.
MULLER: That’s a good question. And it’s one we need to answer. The 17-mile bridge I don’t believe is the answer. I think you’d have to pull people off the island way too early in the case of an evacuation. Power is the other reason. If you were to run power cables along that bridge, the Hatteras Island power bills would be insupportable. It’s as much as economic decision as anything else. And when you look at the billion-dollar cost of that bridge, you can pump an awful lot of sand and engineer a lot of beach for that kind of money. Is it a constant battle? Sure. It’s a natural area. But I think we need to be ready to fight that battle. All these strategies that bypass Pea Island lose a big component of the Outer Banks. It’s a wonderful spot. And I’d hate to see us lose it.
WOODARD: I echo those same comments. The long bridge isn’t the answer. It bypasses too much pristine beach that our visitors as well as locals are taking advantage of.
But even the short bridge is going to kill miles of access — four at New Inlet and S-Turns. And two more spans to come that will kill another four. That’s half of Pea Island.
WOODARD: And that just goes back to what Bob says: we have to make those other accesses work and make them available. That’s part of the answer.
All these strategies come down to the funding. Where do you get the money from to do these things? I mean property taxes are going up, our education budget is already strapped; is it time to add a penny to the occupancy tax to fill other shortfalls like we do for nourishment?
MULLER: Well, part of the nourishment money is 1-percent occupancy tax. The bulk of the nourishment money is coming from the affected property owners. And if we are going to do it in developed areas, we need to look those benefitting property owners. Now, Nags Head, when I was on the board, I advocated shifting more of that burden onto the west side —but still having a large chunk of it on the ocean front — because I feel everyone in the community benefits from it.
In the large picture of where does money come from for education and things, I’m not sure new revenue sources is gong to be the answer. The efficient use of existing resources is going to be the answer. Why do we have two garages sitting side by side, fixing diesel school busses and diesel tractors, each one with it’s own layer of management? We’ve got two sets of people mowing grasses. Let’s look for those new efficiencies. They’re not going to be big, but maybe in the aggregate they’ll add up. Again, I mentioned EMS fees, maybe raising EMS fees so we can get back some insurance reimbursements. And a large number of our budget comes from tourism-derived revenues; we can build those revenues and build property values back, if we have a plan to maintain ourselves as a successful vacation destination. If it don’t work — whether the threat is the beach, whether the threat is insurance — we’re gonna see property values decline more and more revaluation situations that see more of that burden shift back to the west side and smaller mainland property owners. Let’s reverse that: let’s get our vacation economy thriving, through more events, more surfing contests. Let’s make this a place that folks want to come to so property values rise, rents rise, more property taxes go on those economic generators –those rental cottages – and the burden will get lifted and shifted back over the other way. So long term to be more efficient; the long-term strategy is to grow the outer banks as a family vacation destination.
WOODARD: Again, like Bob said, I don’t see a need for a special tax. We need to get in there and look at that county budget. There are some duplications and it’s important to do that. But the primary objective of Outer Banks Visitors Bureau is to bring those tourists. If we’re competing with the Floridas and the Myrtle Beaches, we’ve got to bring those people in here to enjoy those things that we as locals have enjoyed for numbers of years. I’ve said a number of times that I can still do the same thing today that I did 40 years ago on the Outer Banks: I can still throw a beach chair and cooler in my vehicle and go out to a beach access and watch one of the top 10 sunrises in the world. I can still climb the highest sand dune on the East Coast and watch one of the top 10 sunsets — take a piece of cardboard and slide down or go fly a kite . You can still go to Oregon inlet and charter a fishing boat and go sport fishing one of the top 10 fishing destination sin the world. What we need to do is to bring more visitors here and continue to grow that; that is our economic base and it’s important we get those folks here. And the Outer Banks Visitors Bureau is spending enormous amounts of money to draw folks into the community and we’re putting it back into the community. We’re building bike paths, we’re building beach accesses, we’re funding shoulder season events to bring people in. I see this marathon event as brining huge numbers in the shoulder season and the more we have the more revenue we can bring in. We’re working very hard with the Town of Nags Head on this Windmill Point project. We haven’t made a decision yet — we’ll be looking at that again in August to see where we want to go — but we’re pumping as much into the community as we can to make things happen.
MULLER: Bob’s right: the Visitor’s Bureau is doing a lot. But it’s interesting to see what private business is doing. Look at what Real is doing down in the tri-villages. It’s a monster in the best sense of the world. When I talk about growing the tax base, I’m no talking about tearing down houses and putting up high-rises. I’m talking about taking your 12 weeks and making it 15; making it 18. We all know the fall is the best time to be here, so let’s make it place people want to come. I think arts tourism is one of the seriously undeveloped segments. I attended a workshop with the Town of Nags Head, trying to make Gallery Row more of an arts tourism destination. A lot of people don’t realize we have the highest number of working artists per capita in the state. There’s an enormous amount of talent we just don’t feature and promote enough.
And there’s other ways we can diversify the economy. We recently had folks from New Jersey come down and test a wave energy device off of Jennette’s Pier. They did it through CSI. We have this wonderful synergy of the Coastal Studies Institute, Duck Pier and Jennette’s Pier that’s unequaled any place on the East Coast. The county has an administrative building; instead of having it sit there with office space, the county can help develop and nurture that industry. And also fight for CSI in the legislature and make sure it maintains funding and grows. We’re getting ready to get enormous amount of data capacity this fall; it’s gonna run right down that bypass, take a turn and head back west. Data capacity you could run a data center on. We need to make sure we’re leveraging that to build our economy in terms of new industry — like software developers — but also into making sure existing businesses are using it to the maximum. Are they marketing and selling surfboards n the internet as well as in the shop? Is the rental cottage property secured with video cams so you can sit in your house in Ohio and make sure your cottage is secure in the wintertime? Things like that. So there’s a lot of opportunities to add to the economy and the vacation experience that is out there.
Back to the school thing. I know there’s stuff to pinch, but there are also expenses that rise every year based on what the state will fund and won’t fund because we added an extra school. And apparently, we’re already behind on maintenance. And, obviously, tourism fuels everything. But one thing that’s frustrating for residents, I think, is when it comes to projects that drive or protect tourism, decision makers find the funding — or in the case of nourishment, we raise it —but not so much when it comes to spending directly on the year-round community. At what point do you start peeling off that revenue and instead of funding something to help the visitors’ experience, like a new bike path — or buying something shiny and tangible like a new helicopter — and a apply money directly to filling community needs like education? A bike path is nice, but just as you suggest county employees will leave if they don’t get a raise; teachers will leave if they can’t get ahead. And that’s a draw for more talented people to move here that will produce the industries you’re referring to.
WOODARD: That’s a very serious question. That’s a tough situation to take a look at having not been through that budget process county wise. I know from a town perspective at KDH, you have to fund needs rather than wants. And you have to set some priorities, see what’s on the table and make the tough decisions. And that’s the only way I know to take a look at that. There are other avenues for funding paths and things, like grants, but you heave to take a hard look at the educational piece. And I would pick the school board’s brains on that and get their input. I know, many years ago, Bob [Muller] got really involved in affordable housing issues so we could get quality teachers.
MULLER: And Bob [Woodard] was a big supporter . . .
WOODARD: So, again, those are things I’d need to be in committee to study and take a hard look at because education is important and we need that proper funding there. But, if I had my druthers I’d table a path in favor of doing what needs to be done on the educational side.
MULLER: A quarter of our county budget goes to education. All of that money is unallocated tax dollars — there’s no matching funds. The health department, half their money comes from tax dollars, have comes from the state, federal and other sources. Same with social services. With schools, there’s $25million that the county appropriates to schools, virtually all of it is property tax, occupancy tax, sales tax dollars. So we have to be really careful with that. Because we can make real savings there or, as we run it up, it goes directly into the tax rate. There’s nothing to soften that effect. There’s a couple of things we can do there: the school board has very strict maintenance schedules. So you replace air handler very five years, or windows every seven, whether it needs to be replaced or not. So when the school board starts talking about unfunded maintenance, you need to go look at the school and see if the window’s still good.
Which points to a bigger problem and that’s communication between the school board and the county board. It got so bad in the 90s we had a lawsuit. You got the funding formula we currently use out of that. And those boards need to sit down and start from scratch again and begin working on their processes so one side isn’t trying to bludgeon the other side into submission. So they’re working together to get what’s best. One thing the school board does have that a lot of parts of the county doesn’t have is good metrics. The school board can tell you what their test scores are, what their graduation rates are — all those kinds of things. What shocked me when I looked at the county budget is there’s nothing in there to tell you how a department is performing except to tell you whether it spent all it’s money or not last year. There’s no “what was the cost of picking up trash?” or “how much did we spend delivering subpoenas?” or “how time was spent doing law enforcement?” O “What’s the smoking program costing us per person who quit smoking?”
There’s no metrics in the county budget. And one of the things that can help us get a handle on it so we’re not responding to people who are driving costs is to start looking at the results of our service. You open up a municipal budget, you’ll see: how many tons of garbage were picked up at x cost; how many miles were driven; here are our arrests, our fire responses, the number of tax bills collected. So there’s all those metrics that the county board — if they had a workshop — could’ve had a chance to look at. and I hate to beat on that, but it just staggered me. And in their defense, two years ago they did a lot of work on their two-year budget, but I would think you would at least spend a work session or two looking before they passed something.
WOODARD: Absolutely.
MULLER: So education, we need to reform that a partnership but also need to look honestly and hard at what the school board’s needs are. But there other sources on the margin for money, like a little higher tax collection rate, not much but we can push a little harder. The county is now farming out collection of it’s of its EMS, which I think will do a lot for the collection of EMS bills, because they don’t collect a pretty decent percentage. And there’s some other minor things like that that which will help revenue streams on the margin. But in the end it comes down to what kind of government services you want and what are you willing to pay for. Governments are how we make our decisions as a community and we need to decide: do we need a helicopter? If we do, a helicopter that can be reimbursed by Medicare costs $7 million. You can buy a cheaper helicopter, but you’re not going to get the revenue stream that comes with it. Likewise, schools that deliver top quality education cost this much money, so we decide together as a group whether we make those expenditures or not. That’s what elections are about. That’s what public forums are about. Folks need to do what we both did: start going to town meetings, serve on a town board, become part of that process. It’s a little time consuming, but it can be fun too. And the end result is you get to walk around and say, “I was a part of that.” That’s a really good feeling. And if folks pick up nothing else from these discussions it’s that being involved in decision-making is not a bad thing. It’s important. It’s something. Everyone needs to do and they’ll find they enjoy it.
WOODARD: Well we hope so, at least, because they’re making decision that affect heir lives.
MULLER: And elected officials really do want to hear from people.
WOODARD: Absolutely. It’s important. Nothing’s more frustrating than not to hear from your constituents. We have minor issues on the table and you’ll have 20 or 30 people show up — then you have a budget hearing and nobody shows. These are things that affect your lives and your livelihood. And I echo what Bob said: we do care. We do want to hear what you say. And we do take it in full consideration. Sometimes we may not support your ideology but we make the decisions based on what we think is best for the community as a whole.
MULLER: And that’s one of the things we learned in Nags Head when we started putting our meetings on TV — Bob’s learning it now in KDH – I can’t tell you the number of times someone form Colington would walk up in the post office and say, “I watched your Nags Head meeting, I never thought about drainage in those terms. I never thought about elevating buildings to prevent flooding possibly causing surface and groundwater on other lots and what’s the more important value.” There’s a lot that goes into making decisions, and the more people participate, the more they’ll understand about the balancing act that making decisions as an elected leader is. And drainage is really good one, because how you balance public safety, public good or protecting a home versus the possible impacts on adjacent homes?
It’s a “where do rights begin and end” kind of thing. And this is a good segue; this is where I try to turn into Chris Matthews. What prompted this idea was at the May 8 primary I got into a parking lot discussion with two people where both said “I’ll never vote for him.” For Commissioner Woodard it was — no surprise here – all about Lowes. Mayor Muller, yours was more tied to the Isabel response where South Nags Head stayed closed off for a week. In both cases, they felt like you ignored the will of your constituents. Would you care to respond?
WOODARD: Well , you know, there’s probably more than one person who said that about the Lowes. And they certainly have a right to feel that way; and I have empathy for someone who felt like that or feels like that. But we have an elected board who has a property owner that has property rights. And I took a sworn oath hat I would defend the property rights of those owners. And they had a right to sell that property to whomever could qualify to purchase that property. And we got into debates that it was a maritime forest — it was never a maritime forest. It was zoned commercial property. It was always zoned commercial property. And I’m not going to deny the right for an individual who owns property to exercise their right to sell that property to whomever can qualify to purchase it. Just for me to say, “No, I don’t want a Lowes,” that’s not the right answer, either. Our country was built on entrepreneurialism. It was built on the fact that competition is good. So we, the board, did what was right at the time and what was ethical to approve. And I’ll defend that as long as I’m in office with respect to Kill Devil Hills and I’ll protect individual property rights as long as I’m in office.
Because the perception was there were concessions made.
WOODARD: Well that’s what everybody said. There were two issues: one was pervious pavement, which a fellow commissioner had been trying to get on the table for about five years, to use pervious pavement; the other issue was with respect to the size of a sign on a larger facility. So neither one of those functions would’ve killed the Lowes deal or anyone else purchasing the property. It’s just not factual. And quite honestly, it’s put about 118 permanent jobs added to the county that are full-time, benefit-paying positions. And that’s important. And they’re a North Carolina-based company. Competition is good, and I don’t know that I need to say anymore than ewe did what we felt was right for the time and I’m not going to violate property rights.
MULLER: Can I talk about Lowe’s? I’ll tell you, I think given the framework that the Lowe’s application came into, I feel like the KDH board did what they were required to do. But I’ll also tell you that that framework wasn’t mandatory. The Town of Nags Head set size limits on stores, specially to keep out big box stores, back in the 90s. And any town, any community that had the discussion, had the option of saying, “we want these stores” or “we don’t want these stores.” And Kill Devil Hills had a clear policy that that’s what they wanted. Whether it was they wanted the jobs or what have you. Nags Head had a different value, our vision statement talks about partnering with locally owned businesses to keep wealth in the community. That’s a value and the value you want development and jobs is another value. But that would not have happened in the Nags Head that I helped govern.
Which brings me to my answer about folks who don’t want to vote more me. I had 20 years for people to be pissed off about something that I did. And Isabel was certainly a divisive issue. We kept South Nags Head closed until we felt it was safe to allow residents and property owners to return. There were some folks who really, really didn’t like that. We know because we held a facilitated public meeting after the event. We set the board up and we said what we needed and then we got feedback and listened to that feedback and tried to build a betters system. So there were decisions I made that people didn’t like, sure. But I’ll stand or fall on my reputation as an elected leader who stops, listens, thinks and makes a decision. Who works hard and is prepared when he walks into a meeting and does what the thinks is best for the community. And if there aren’t some people who are pissed off as you as an elected official, you’re not doing your job.
WOODARD: And I agree. I don’t’ have 20 years, I have about 12 – 16 with the planning board. And I have enough to get people upset. If they’re gonna hold one issue against you, it is what it is. But you never hear someone come up and say, “Bob, I really appreciate the fact that you held the line on taxes. Bob, I appreciated the Centennial bike path you got put in for the 100ths celebration of flight. Bob, thanks for being the catalyst of Ocean Acres and making the storm problems we had with the floodings in our homes go away. Bob, thank you for holding the line and not letting our personnel go so the employees were be able to keep their jobs.” And the list goes on. So, I’ll take the one or two negatives against all the good and positives.
Well, I’ve always argued it’s important to thank elected officials when they do make a decision you agree with – or just for sticking their necks out.
MULLER: It may be important to pat elected officials on the back, but if you really want to thank someone, thank their spouses. [laughs] Because they can’t got to the grocery store sometimes because issues are on the table that you’re involved in.
WOODARD: That’s exactly right.
So, philosophically, where do you draw the line between reflecting popular opinion and voting your conscience?
MULLER: You need to have a set of values and your votes need to reflect those values. There’s a role for listening to the public and making sure you’re informed and that you see all sides of any issue and you have all the information. But for me, the decision comes down to doing what I think is best for the community. And there’s been some times when that was really an unpopular decision. Sexually-oriented businesses is probably the best example. When Nags Head approached the adult store issue, from the beginning I said, “Nags head had to allow but regulate adult businesses.” And the board, and the public had a very angry meeting. They said, “You’re wrong, this will be the ruination of our community.” The fact of the matter was, if we denied them, the Supreme Court says you can’t – it’s a free speech issue. Gut you have to stand up with what you think is best for the community. You can’t go along with something you think is going to be wrong. But you do that in the contest of being fully informed of community views and opinions.
WOODARD: I cant say it any better. And I think I can say this – I’ve been told this — that there’s nobody any more prepared at every single Town of KDH commissioners’ meeting. I’ve been told by the current mayor, the former mayor, all my fellow commissioners: Nobody does the research that you do and comes any more prepared to a meeting than you do. But I have to vote my conscience of what I think is best for the town.
And we’ve certainly had another recent issue with the chickens in the backyard, which I’m sure you’re familiar with. And I had an open mind from the get go. As a matter of fact, I entered into the topic to hold a public hearing, which we were not obligated to do. We also had some students in First Flight High School who did some research, pro and con, that I said we needed to hear before we made a decision. So we postponed the vote until we had a public hearing. And I admit, the public hearing was overwhelmingly for it. But I had strong issues from the other side where it was pitting neighbor against neighbor and I didn’t think that was the right thing to do for our community. So I voted against it. And it failed. So those are the tough decisions you have to make. And there were some unhappy folks. And I was told, “You didn’t listen to the community, you didn’t listen to the majority” and they certainly have a right to feel that way. But as an elected official, you do you research, then you do what you think is best for your town at the time based on hour land use plan you have in place.
MULLER: And other than having a referendum, how do you know what the majority of the public thinks? I’ve been at public hearings that sound very one-sided, but just because you have 30 people in favor of it, in a town with 2000 voters and 3000 residents , that means you have 2000 people you don’t know how they feel. Perhaps you can extrapolate that public sentiment is this way or that way, but I always scoff when I hear elected leaders say, “I’m doing this because the people want me to.” I don’t buy it. They’re doing it because that’s what aligns with their values because you have no way of knowing other than elections what those people really want. And again: public hearings are really important, visitations, emails, phone calls. Totally important. And believe me, public hearing aren’t always fun; elected officials don’t have public hearings because they want people to come in and point fingers at them and shout at them. You need that public input as much as you can. But in the end, as Bob said, you make those decision based on your values and what you think is best for the community.
That’s why you do vote. And you do get out there. You both sound so much alike — not that you’d vote the same way — but in terms of your philosophies. What can you tell voter out there to push them one way or the other — your way, I’d assume?
MULLER: I would urge the voter to talk to folks who live in Nags head. To look at my record. To look at the community I helped build. And to look at my public service after that time. I love the Outer Banks. I love it a lot. And we have a great future ahead of us if we grasp it, engage it and make it our own. Start dealing with the issues that shape that future. I have a history of doing hat in Nags Head and I’d like to do that for the county. I can’t contrast myself with Bob, all I can do is present my experience and the town I helped grow since, working on affordable housing, trying to get broadband indo underserved areas, things like that.
WOODARD: Same here. I’m certainly not going to bash my opponent, because I have the utmost respect for Bob. We’ve served on different things together, and I know his commitment to the community and I know he knows mine. This is a place I came to in the 50s with my parents. I fell in love with it. It’s a place I’ve always wanted to live and a place I’ve made my home permanently for along time. And I’m of the type that I feel like I’m paying my civic rent. I’m giving my time back to the community to work for a better place to live for a long future to come. I have so who grew up in Chesapeake and works here permanently. Married a local girl. And I have granddaughter who I want to experience the same things I experienced. I have another son who lives in Suffolk. They don’t live here, but I know he ‘d love to because he’s always coming down here to surf. I would say the same thing: to those who truly know me, if you really want to find out about a person and what their values are, don’t’ willy-nilly take a position like, ‘He doesn’t care about this.” If you know me, you know that I wear my feelings on my cuff. I’m very serious about what I do and what is in store for the future of our county. Take the time to talk tome. Take the time to pick up the phone and call me. Take the time to ask those that know me very well” “Will bob give it 100%?” He’ll give it 110% and then some. So find that out. If you’ve got one issue you’ve had a problem with me on, I respect that. But also know me as a person. And know me from talking to people in the community that know my best interest is for the county and the town that I live in. And we’ll let the voting public decide.
MULLER: And we’ll get a good hard working commissioner either way.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
SYMPATHY FOR THE DEVIL 
Ed note: It’s easy to demonize the National Park Service as the root of all access evil — until you realize the enviro side hates them nearly as much. For the summer edition of Milepost (Issue 1.2), we sat down with Cape Hatteras Superintendent, Mike Murray, for their perspective on how the new ORV special regulation came about. What follows is the full two-hour interview. For the full Cape Hatteras ORV rule and comments, click here. And for an updated list of seasonal closures click here
Hate clouds judgment. For example, it’s hard to convince folks you’re a diehard nature lover when your bumper says plovers taste great. Forwarding photos of park rangers shooting foxes can only backfire once people learn it was really a rabies scare. And, most importantly, while broadcasting beach closures non-stop is one way of saying “Save Hatteras” — it’s another way of saying, “don’t bother coming to visit.”
Look: there’s lots of reasons to be angry about the access situation down south. From the suing parties’ shady methods to the lack of flexibility on both sides of the issue to the sense of powerlessness that comes from watching outside interests make decisions that affect local life.
Unfortunately — no matter how passionate the emotion or noble the purpose — screaming wildly over the new ORV regulations won’t help as much as trying to understand it. In an effort to diffuse some of the anger and infuse some reason, we sat down with Cape Hatteras National Seashore’s Parks Superintendent, Mike Murray, to get the Park Service’s take. Instead of a power fiend intent on “killing an island,” we found a public servant tasked with meeting the needs of conflicted, vocal user groups while following federal mandates and avoiding lawsuits. We also discovered that nobody is happy with how things turned out. Not even the conservationists. As Murray notes, “People are surprised and disappointed that we didn’t just do it the way they wanted. It’s not that simple.”
Don’t believe him? Keep reading. (Better yet, read the federally registered document. Of 86 comments, 76 get told “sorry,” “you’re wrong” or just plain “no.”) It may not make you less mad, but it will make you feel less singled out. And seeing the full range of perspectives can only make the cause more effective in pleading its case for future change. Because as easy as it is to demonize the Park Service as pure evil, the real devil is in the details.
MILEPOST: Where are you from originally?
SUPERINTENDENT MIKE MURRAY: I’m from Franklin, Virginia. As a kid my family came down here quite a bit. I’ve been coming here a long time. I remember taking the ferry over Oregon Inlet.
How’d you end up in your current position with the park service?
It’s a long circuitous path. I went to the University of Virginia, majored in Biology. Got very interested in outdoor recreation. I was in the outing club. And I got a seasonal job at Yellowstone as an entrance ranger back in 1978. Got hooked on the service. Got a permanent job. Worked in law enforcement at places like the Everglades and Yosemite National Park, New River Gorge, Sequoia and Kings Canyon. Then I went back to Yellowstone as the Assistant Chief Ranger of Operations. After that, I became the Deputy Superintendent at Cape Cod National Seashore. About that time my parents were getting older — my wife and I have their only two grandkids — so we were looking for an opportunity to be closer to home. The opportunity came open at Cape Hatteras. I had an interest; I knew the place as a kid. And was excited to be able to come back in late 2005.
Cape Cod had its own ORV situation. Were you part of that? And did it prepare you at all for coming here preparation coming here?
Cape Cod has its own history of ORV management. It’s an ORV and piping plover park. Most of their contentiousness came well before my time. They had lawsuits back in the 1980s for non-compliance with the executive orders. They had a plan and a regulation and permit program in place. Around the mid 1990s they went through negotiated rule making to revise the regulation, which is much simpler apparently than creating one from scratch. I arrived a few years later when they were just starting to implement. So I was there when they implemented the regulations but I had nothing to do with the development of it.
Did you know when you were coming here that this would be part of your position?
I knew it was a big issue here and I knew it would be challenging. I worked at Yellowstone on snowmobile regulations. Those are similar types of contentious issues involving passionate motorized recreationists versus conservation and environmental groups that think motorized vehicles should be more restricted so there’s less impact on wildlife. So I had some experience, but nothing prepared me for this.
When I spoke to people out west, they assumed we were encroaching on wilderness. But the wilderness grew up around the place. So it’s different in some ways.
This area has a unique history. And I think beach driving — ORV is sort of the newer term — but I think beach driving began as a means of transportation when there were no paved rods. So when people out west talk about offroad vehicles, they tend to think about souped-up dune buggies racing across the desert. Here it’s very much transportation people use to get to remote locations on the beach.
Looking at those comments, it hit me: you’re dealing with this unique local environment and the various people being affected. At the same time, you have this national framework of rules. Is that the heart of the conflict? You have to fit these individual needs into a national format?
To a certain extent, each location is unique — so there’s some latitude for variability — but there are some very fundamental issues. Two executive orders issued in the 1970s governing the use of offroad vehicles on federal land. In essence, those said ORV use has to be managed in order to minimize impacts on wildlife and wildlife habitat. Minimize impacts to soil and vegetation. Minimize user conflicts and provide for public safety. The park service as a whole issued a regulation to implement those executive orders, and basically it said in all the parks in the National Park Service — there are only a limited number where offroad vehicles are allowed — if those locations allow it, there has to be a park-specific regulation or special regulation. So one of the problems here at Cape Hatteras has been that in the 1970s the park started an ORV management plan but didn’t finish it. And they never promulgated the special regulation to authorize ORVs. So it’s been a lawsuit waiting to happen for 30 years. Without that special regulation, we were told by the courts in 2007 — a court in Eastern North Carolina issued an order that basically said without an ORV plan and special regulation, ORV use at the seashore is not authorized and therefore prohibited. So, the need to get the plan and regulation is important — number one , just to authorize the use – and then two, it needs to be managed in a way to minimize impacts to wildlife and user conflicts and those types of things. So the purpose of the plan and regulation is to meet those requirements.
So the rule came down from on high: do something to get in compliance or it’s illegal. And there was even some talk that Judge Boyle might shut down beach driving entirely. And that’s what prompted the negotiation rule making process.
And I should add that Cape Hatteras is not the only park facing this. There was a nationwide lawsuit against a handful of National Park units back in the early 2000s. Blue Water Network, or Friends of the Earth, had a joint lawsuit. So a number of parks have been trying to get their ORV plans done, as well. Cape Lookout is one. Glen Canyon National Recreation Area is another — to name a few.
Looking at comments, I was impressed by how opposing the views were. And, many times, you had to tell them both no. So the guidelines seemed like bumpers on each side that kept you from going too far to one side or the other.
I’d say that’s generally accurate. Under the park service general regulations there are only certain parks that are even allowed to have ORVs. It’s only allowed in national seashore, national lakeshores, national recreation areas and national preserves. There’s 50 of those out of 397 parks. Of those 50, less than 15 allow it. So ORV use is relatively rare in the park system. Because of these executive orders that require a park specific regulation, each of those parks has to do their own regulation, so they determine the management locally based on the local situation. So I can speak in reference to Cape Cod: they don’t have species of nesting sea turtles there; they have fewer species of nesting shorebirds; the breeding season doesn’t last as long. They did a regulation back in the 80s that limits ORVs to about 25% of the national seashore. So that gives them built in control and they manage ORVs in that 25%. Here, we didn’t have regulation, we didn’t have a plan, ORVs use a much larger area, we have more species that nest — plus the turtles — so it’s a more complicated situation.
Has the number of ORV parks changed at all over the years?
The number of parks that allow it with special regulation has been relatively stable for a while. The number of parks that allow it isn’t changing significantly, but there’s a handful that haven’t completed their plan and special regulation. Some are a little ahead of us, some are a little behind us.
Because some people feel this is a master plan by the park service to eliminate ORVs entirely. And if that number was increasing, that obviously wouldn’t be the case. Where if they were disappearing, one might assume the opposite.
I would say it’s not the park service’s plan to eliminate ORV use at he parks where it’s been allowed. Several things are at play here. One, the popularity of sport utility vehicles in the 1990s. At Cape Cod, we saw a significant increase. More people have four-wheel drive, and in the populated northeast, there’s not a lot of places you can use it. So at places like Cape Cod, it becomes more popular. Drive down the road here, you see a lot of four-wheel drive vehicles. And if it’s allowed someplace, it comes under more scrutiny. There’s concerns in Corolla, and it’s not even a part of the park system. It really ends up being a conflict between people’s values. Some people view the beach as a place to go for a peaceful walk, and they don’t find it that peaceful if the beach is a road or a parking lot. Others, view the ORV as a means of transportation to get to and do what they want to. Despite what it seems to people, the park service tries not to interject itself into those personal value conflicts. We have an agency mission and policies we need to follow. So the goal of our plan is to provide diverse recreational experience opportunities. So people can judge what they want to do for themselves and then find reasonable opportunities to do that. And I can tell you from the public comments, there were a lot of people who do not like the idea of ORV vehicles on a seashore beach, just as there are many people who’ve been doing it for years and want to continue to be able to. So we tried not to take sides, while at the same time finding some reasonable balance that lets us meet our legal mandates.
Sounds a lot like being a referee. No one likes the referee.
I can say that from looking at most of the comments on the draft plan EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) — there were thousands, so I can’t say I read every individual form letter where it said the same thing as the last 50 or 100 — but more narrative type comments I tried to read so I could get what they were thinking. And they were very polarized. People thought it was too restrictive on one side, on the other, they thought it wasn’t restrictive enough. And to the point that we found substance in those comments — legitimate concerns and suggestions we thought were appropriate to implement — we tried to incorporate that into the plan. So a lot of people say we didn’t listen to this side or that side, we listened to all sides —but they didn’t agree. It’s really tough to try to figure out what were the appropriate compromises. We had suggestions for buffer distances for birds that would have worked great for access but worked poorly for the birds, so we didn’t use those suggestions. I know you attended quite a bit of negotiated rulemaking, and similar points of view, polarized views hat you heard there, carried through on the draft EIS and the proposed rule. It continued to be polarized with very little agreement between this side and that side.
That whole process moved me in terms of how things work in a political environment. Because you hope that people will come to the table and try to figure out a way to make everybody happy; but really, they just fight for what’s theirs. Is that why it fell apart?
It’s hard. When it first started, I was optimistic. I came to Cape Cod after the negotiated rulemaking, and it was very successful there, but looking back it was a lot more narrowly defined. It was to revise the exiting regulation, it wasn’t to create the whole thing from scratch. What we were taught by the facilitators, who gave us some negotiation training in the beginning, is everyone decides what their negotiating tactics are and have to assume people are going to go with what gets them the best deal for what they want; and that’s probably the way it played out. What was best for the park service would’ve been if the ORV side would’ve agreed with the environmental side on something that was legal to implement. We would’ve loved to implement that. Unfortunately, they didn’t agree. And my interpretation is that since they wouldn’t compromise, we had to figure out the compromises for ourselves. And people generally don’t like what we came up with.
Who makes those calls? Is it a panel? DC? People in the office?
The park staff and I have quite a bit of say, but it’s a park service plan. So we had project managers from the National Environmental Quality Division office in Denver. They were here through the process at all the negotiated rulemaking meetings. We had solicitors from the Department of Interior that advised us on legality. Ultimately, the way the process works is that the park recommends a plan and then the regional office has to approve it. But on something as high profile as this it’s reviewed up into the Department of Interior to decide whether or not they approve it. But it’s a park service plan. It’s not “the Seashore’s plan” or “Mike Murray’s plan,” it’s the park service plan.
One comment that struck me is: “Locals shouldn’t have to pay” and the response was, “It’s a national park; it belongs to the whole public.” In some ways it was a decision that was beyond the scope of 5000 Hatteras Island residents or 34,000 Dare County residents from the very beginning.
I’ve worked at I think eight units of the National Park system now. If there’s any entrance fee or special use fee like this, it comes up everywhere, and the answer’s always the same: it’s national policy. As much as it would be nice locally and increase goodwill, we can’t show favoritism. As a national park system we have to treat everybody fairly when it comes down to fees. But we did offer different kinds of passes. So if you’re a frequent user, it’s advantageous financially to get the annual pass as opposed to the weekly pass. And to that extent it’s possible to build in some opportunity, but then you don’t have to live here to get that.
Have you ever seen a place in your experience where the park and community was so intertwined?
Surprisingly, while every park is unique, this set of circumstances is not the only place with communities either right on the boundary or surrounded by one, so it is not completely unique in that regard. Cape Cod, for example, had six incorporated towns where the park ran the length of them. Sometimes the seashore was park property and the bay side was town; sometimes the seashore had property on both sides but no connection the middle. And we had the same fee scenario there at our beach parking lots. We had six towns that wanted to be able to park for free, and there was only one town that was entitled to that based on their deed transfer. They deeded their beaches to the park service in the 60s and in that transfer they reserved the right of the residents to park there at no charge. So those kind of longstanding, binding contractual agreements can come into play, but nothing like that specifically relates to beach driving here. Now, the enabling legislation authorized the continuation of commercial fishing and the park service has a special regulation for the seashore authorizing it, and that is limited by regulation to the residents of Dare County. There’s a list of the different towns and villages. If you’re a resident of that, and you have a state commercial fishing license, then you’re entitled to a free park service commercial fishing permit. Under the ORV plan, people who get that permit don’t pay a fee for the ORV permit. And that dates back to the enabling legislation.
That’s funny. Because when you talk to people about the enabling legislation, one thing that gets them upset is that — at least the perception is — that the beaches were supposed to stay open forever. I’m assuming they didn’t put that in the deed or some other contract like that town in Cape Cod. Or is the grapevine taking liberties with what transpired?
You’ll get different points of view on this, so my point of view is not necessarily the only one. But if you look at the history and you look at the enabling legislation, if you look at Conrad Worth, the Park Service Director’s 1952 letter, you can pick something out of context and say: “This is what he meant.” The trouble is you have to read things in context. We have all kinds of laws and the enabling legislation, this is a key section where it talks about recreational purposes. So it authorizes development for recreational purposes, and then everything else “shall be “permanently reserved as a primitive wilderness and no development of the project” — it wasn’t a park in 1937, it was a proposal — “or plan for the convenience of visitors shall be undertaken which would be incompatible with preservation of the unique flora and fauna.”
This is not the entire enabling legislation. One of the earliest sections says the park will be administered, developed and preserved in accordance with Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4 of this chapter. Section 1 is the Organic Act. So congress intended from 1937 — that was sort of legal premise, one of the first things stated in the enabling legislation was the Organic Act.
So when you look at the Organic Act, the constraint is it’s for conserving resources and for visitor enjoyment, provided resources are conserved unimpaired for future generations. Now when we get sued over the Organic Act, which has happened many times since 1916, the courts have ruled consistently — and the park service policy is — that when there’s a conflict between conservation and use, conservation is to be predominant. Because if we don’t conserve those resources for future generations, then we haven’t met the fundamental purpose.
So, basically, if you think about 1937, there was very little development. No paved roads on Hatteras or Ocracoke. No paved roads south of Whalebone Junction. There were no beach parking lots. No restrooms. So, Congress recognized there needed to be some development. But they put constraints on it — and they’re subject to interpretation — but “certain areas deemed particularly adaptable shall be developed.” And if you read the 1938 prospectus for the seashore, they talk about developing what became Coquina Beach. They didn’t call it that, but ”paved road to paved parking and beach restroom, north of Oregon Inlet.” In 1938 the park service plan was no paved roads on Hatteras or Ocracoke. And over the years, it became a political compromise to agree to the road. And back in the 50s, when NCDOT paved the road, in the administrative history the park service thinking was, “Well, if people drive down the highway, then beach driving is no longer a necessity and we can manage it better.” But they didn’t really change anything. And so there’s this really long history of continuing beach driving, park service concerns throughout the years. In the 1960s, after Bonner Bridge was built, the number of people driving to Hatteras was much greater. There was a complaint to the Director of the National Park Service basically saying, “It’s no longer Cape Hatteras National Seashore; it’s Cape Hatteras National parking lot.” And that was back when they had 50 vehicles parked at Cape Point, much less 500.
The way I look at it? That’s all interesting history. You can pick choose and interpret it, but I can’t turn back the clock. We can’t reduce development. We have highways and bridges that get a lot of people here. My job is just to be sure we manage visitor activities —in this case, offroad vehicle use — in accordance with laws, regulations and policies in order to conserve resources and give people diverse recreational opportunities.
At the same time, you have more leeway here, in terms of recreational activities than other places. There seems to be two bumper guidelines in the comment responses. For people who want unlimited access it’s “we have to follow the Organic Act.” Then when someone said, “Get rid of ORVs,” the reply is, “We need to provide diverse opportunities.”
We do. There are some comments that said, “You need to eliminate ORV use.” That was not our intent. We did not include that as one of the management options and we were criticized by some people for that. But the intent was to manage it in accordance with regulations and policies and to make ORVs authorized, legally defensible and provide diverse opportunities for other people. Some people do not find it pleasant to walk on a heavily trafficked beach. And when you read “permanently preserve as primitive wilderness,” the question comes up a lot in our comments: “Where do I go for that?” To me, it’s not a valid argument to say, “It’s in the middle of Buxton woods away from the beach.” Because the seashore’s all about the shoreline. And it says, in essence, the seashore was created to prevent development of the shoreline — or limit development to that which is necessary. So the goal of the plan is to deal with these multiple, sometimes conflicting issues and values and legal mandates.
One thing I’m sensitive to is that we were heavily criticized by conservation groups. And the quote out of many of their comments is — even though we are restricting ORVs more than before — “you still allow more miles of ORV use than Cape Cod and Assateague Island National Seashores combined.” In other words, they’re saying, “You’re still the most liberal ORV use area.” But I would argue that this long-standing use is appropriate as long as we can minimize the impacts, and particularly the big impacts here are when ORV use is in conflict with shorebird and sea turtle nesting activities. So that’s a temporal conflict. It occurs year after year, but it’s not year-round. So it’s something that has to be seasonally managed, which is where the resource protection measures come in. We have a lot of staff energy we have to put into monitoring nest activity so we can be sure it’s adequately safeguarded so it can evolve on its own.
So while some people say, wait for a nest and stop night driving locally, you say, “There’s a limit to the resources we can devote.” So you put laws in place that make it efficient.
And some of it relates to national guidance and policies. On the federal threatened and endangered species list there’s often a recovery plan, which is developed by the Fish and Wildlife service. A scientific panel of experts develops the management recommendations and, as a federal agency, the park service — under law — must contribute to the recovery of those threatened and endangered species. So by policy we should be following the recovery plan. It’s pretty awkward if the recovery plan for loggerhead sea turtles says night driving should be prohibited in the nesting habitat during the nesting season — it’s legally awkward, it’s internal policy awkward — if the park service allows night driving. Particularly when we have no particularly good data that shows it makes no difference here.
Two things I see that come up a lot: number one, we talk about ORVS but a lot the pedestrian access gets lost as a byproduct of this. That stretch from Avon to Buxton, can be roped off almost entirely. Which seems outrageous from the perspective that the purpose of these parks is for people to enjoy them. My main beef has always been: if people can’t enjoy the parks, they won’t protect them.
Sure.
Do you think it’s reasonable for people to be upset they can’t walk to the beach?
I respect the right of people to have their own opinion. And if their opinion is they’re upset about it, I accept that. From the Organic Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act point of view, the park service is obligated to protect those birds, particularly when they’re nesting. Protect the eggs, protect the chicks, etc. I wish I had a magic wand for a simple solution to enable these birds to nest successfully when there’s a lot of visitors using the area. But I don’t. And I’m not sure there’s a way to do that. When the closures to protect nests are in place it does affect both pedestrians and ORVs. So, in that regard, the discussion is not about ORVs. But when I hear the big generalizations that “pedestrians can’t go anywhere either,” I usual interpret that as someone doesn’t have enough information or the full perspective.
Under the consent decree, using the same buffers that we’ve incorporated into the long-term plan, out of 67 miles of beach, we rarely had less than 50 miles open. And 17 miles sounds like a lot — and sometimes those 17 miles included very popular areas like Cape Point, South Point of Ocracoke, etc. — but the challenge is during peak visitor period is also the peak breeding season for those species that are protected. So the way the plan is written, the best the park service can do is provide adequate protection, try our best to inform people where these closures are. The Google Earth map, if people are familiar with that, generally shows the current status. There’s many, many miles open to pedestrians and/or offroad vehicles. And there are some places that people want to go that are currently closed and will be closed later. So, to me it’s a dynamic situation. It’s hard to have a solution that works both for the birds and the people at the same time. It’s a temporal conflict. It’s during a certain time the year it’s a conflict more than it is other times.
That’s the other question: where’s the science? Was there any attempt to gauge behavior and patterns here on Hatteras? Or was it all adopted from other areas?
There’s studies from a lot of different areas. Particularly on the shorebirds, there’s research well back into the 70s. We have some research here and some generally accepted scientific research from elsewhere that’s often used as a touchstone reference for guidance on how to protect or manage a certain species, including in terms of buffer distances. So, there’s not one simple, every species has been studied so thoroughly here that we know exactly the right buffer distance here. American Oystercatchers have been well studied by NC State University at Cape Lookout National Seashore and at Cape Hatteras. So there’s a lot of information there. Piping plover have been studied in New England, but also to a certain extent at Assateague, more than here. Some of the colonial water birds have been studied at different locations. So I would say there’s no simple solution that fits each species. We have to look at the available research, get scientific expert advice on the applicability of the study here, and we have some experience implementing certain size buffers under the consent decree, different size buffers under the interim strategy…
The buffer is 1000 meters now. Have they increased?
Generally not. For piping plover chicks — just chicks, not nests — there’s a 1000-meter ORV buffer. And this originates in the piping plover recovery plan, which basically says in order to avoid take — which means unlawful loss or killing of a piping plover chick — it gives two sets of recommendations: one, is that when there’s chicks, you exclude offroad vehicles from 1000 meters on either side of the nest because the chicks are known to be highly mobile; or — because there’s an “or” clause —if there’s been intensive monitoring, and the local data supports it, than the buffer could be less, and it mentions 200 meters. The issue is in the interim plan we went with 200 meters and didn’t have great data to support it. So I think that was one of the many reasons we were sued because it didn’t really quite meet that recommendation. And so under the consent decree, the parties that agreed to the settlement agreed to the 1000-meter ORV buffer for piping plover chicks. The nest buffer under the consent decree is 50 meters for piping plovers. Each species has a different latitude or susceptibility to disturbance. So, in some ways, ironically, some of the other birds that are not federally listed as threatened or endangered are more prone to disturbance and they need a bigger buffer. But it’s a species-appropriate buffer. There are a number of studies that are generally accepted out there. If you were to look at the comments, it would seem like there is disagreement on the science. There’s not that much disagreement among the wildlife scientists.
I think the problem is it feels like you’re taking the salesman’s word for it. If you invest your life into protecting something, you’re not going to have an objective opinion. I think what people were hoping for is some objective research from right here without a dog in the fight. Is there opportunity moving forward to get local data and maybe make changes moving forward? Recognizing that it may change for the worse.
Let me break that into two parts. One is the relevance of existing or pre-existing studies. The park service approached it several different ways. Back in 2005, before my time here, the park service entered into agreement with the US Geological Survey to come study Cape Hatteras, look at the specific species, look at relevant literature — research, studies, etc. — and make management recommendations. This is the infamous USGS protocols. Some people wonder, “What does the USGS know about biology.” Well, back in the 90s the DOI reorganized their science program. And the bottom line is most of the researchers — the pure scientists, not the people who manage on the ground or regulate wildlife — the people who do the research are vested primarily in the US Geological Survey. The internationally recognized Patuxent Wildlife Research Center — that’s USGS. So Patuxent sent specialized scientists who know these species to come do that work. Now, they wrote a report, it wasn’t research — it was recommendations. There’s dispute…
Is that the peer-review dispute?
Right. Or the people who reviewed it, some people feel like there’s the appearance of a vested interest in it. I can’t change what happened before me. So, what we did was, we thought about it — and I wish I’d thought of this earlier, but I didn’t — but at some point I went through my regional office and I asked USGS, “Hey, there’s people who dispute the validity of this report, can you have it reviewed again? Have it objectively reviewed and updated if it needs to be?” And again, the park service, we didn’t put all our stock in what they said, but they identified relevant research, which was also identified by other sources, including the US Fish and Wildlife Service, including the Wildlife Resource Commission of North Carolina. So, rather than put all our eggs in one advisor or one report, we looked at it all. Plus our own experience implementing several different management strategies. And we decided that, if we’re going to err on the side of resource protection — remember when there’s a conflict, conservation is to be predominant — then we need to stick with these buffers.
But we designed the plan to be adaptive. So we identified targets for future numbers of nests or species, so if we’re making progress toward improving those species then we’ll reevaluate progress or not every five years and see if we can adjust something. We’ll have new data that we can see: do we really need 1000 meters for piping plover chicks or not? Or if we give it to them for 1000 meters, we can see how much they do move.
See, the problem is, prior to the consent decree, they weren’t protected much beyond 200 meters. So given the larger buffer from vehicles we’re seeing that they move much further than 200 meters. Not every day, but at a certain point when they’re ready to leave the nest and go to their foraging grounds, they’ll make a big move. It looks like they’ll tend to stay once they’re there. Not always, but most of the time. So our thought is, when we do this periodic review, we’ll have enough local data that if we feel like we can justify changing buffer— and that particular one is one of them—I think if we had the data we might be able to support changing. Then we’d have to consult the Fish and Wildlife service. But I see the plan as sort of a living, adaptable, thing.
We’re also looking at other options for access. Right now we have public scoping to get feedback on the parking and new ORV ramp plan. Public scoping ends on March 31st; but our preferred alternative calls for more parking, more ORV ramps, some interdunal roads to make connections from this ORV to that ORV route more convenient and practical. Before we just start constructing those things, we need to do a smaller environmental document.
So it could get looser after five. But it could also get more restrictive, I assume.
Well, potentially. We would have to determine why it’s not doing any better. On the beach nesting wildlife, there’s generally four factors that play a big role in their success. One is weather, we have no control of that. Two, is availability of suitable habitat; and that can be affected by construction somewhere else. We don’t tend to construct or develop on sensitive wildlife habitat on the seashore, or other is, we may have suitable habitat, but it’s so heavily used then it’s not available when the species need it. So, by having these pre-nesting areas, it’s enabling the best habitat to be available. Three is human disturbance, so when they’re actively nesting or raising these chicks they’re susceptible or sensitive to human disturbance — which increases abandonment of nests, increases loss to predation, things like that. It’s often hard with multiple factors to say a nest loss was caused by one factor. It’s usually an interplay. Then the last one is predation. Predation plays a role, habitat plays a role, human disturbance plays a role, weather, and every year it’s a different combination. Sometimes we can say this nest was loss to predation or big storm overwash, but it all interacts.
And predation is the other big hot button issue. People say you’re killing one animal to save another. I also remember people suggesting in the meetings that ORVs allow for more human interaction, which scares off predators.
If we limit ORVs without managing predation, then we may not have much success and limiting ORVs alone won’t make a huge difference. If we limit predation and don’t limit human disturbance, it’s the same thing. I can’t tell you how much each one contributes at any one moment because there’s a constant interplay between the two. There are some studies, and they’re referenced in the ORV plan, that high levels of recreational use tend to increase predation because a lot of animals are habituated to being around people; they can find scraps, the leftover bait on the beach, discarded fish carcasses and such. Some people in their comments will argue that the more vehicles on the beach, the less predation there is. I’m not sure there’s science to support that; it’s a common sense argument. But there are studies that show the more recreational use, the more predators there are.
The predator control program I have mixed feelings about. I have a degree in Biology, I worked in parks like Yellowstone where mega predators, large predators were eliminated in the 30s — like the gray wolf. And I was there when we re-introduced gray wolves.. The challenge is Yellowstone is a remote area. 2.25 million acres surrounded by six national forests. So it’s a large, in tact ecosystem. And some scientists will say it’s not in tact; it still has migration corridor problems for wildlife, etc. Here, where you have eight developed villages — seven on Hatteras, and Ocracoke — we have a big problem with feral cats. There’s cat colonies in most of the villages we have no control over. There’s mammalian predators that are not native to the island. And there’s some you can argue were here before but they weren’t abundant — foxes, coyotes, and certainly an overabundance of raccoons and possums. And they’re smart, resourceful animals. And they figure out where the food is. In the winter, it’s probably not on the beach; during the breeding season, it’s on the beach. There was a study at Cape Lookout where they tried to trap every raccoon to see what they do; they radio-collared a bunch. In an area where historically they had no raccoons, they had over 300 — on an island with no ferry, no bridge, no roads, no villages. So we probably have many times that on Hatteras. We probably have an unlimited supply.
What we do with our predator program is try to reduce the impact of predation on the nest sites. So the trapping occurs near the nest sites. We catch an awful lot of feral cats. Again, there’s cat colonies in the villages producing feral cats. Some people truly abhor the idea of killing animals. And I have mixed feelings about it myself. And I respect that point of view. But some people are kind of selectively complaining about it. People are against us managing the wildlife, it seems, because they know it will benefit the birds. Some people who want much more open ORV use — and back before 2005, 2006 there were documented cases of chicks being run over. No piping plover chicks, they’re small hard to find, we don’t know; can’t say they have or have not. But American oystercatcher chicks, lease tern chicks, run over because of the pressure to leave areas open to ORVs. So there seems to be an irony of people wanting us to return to that kind of ORV use complaining about an overabundance of predators — including some non-native predators — to benefit the birds. If people out there are interested in the management of wildlife, I’d like to see a better management of the cat colonies. I’m not saying catch and kill ‘em all. Many parts of the country do catch-and-spay program. Ocracoke has a successful program. Vet schools in the state have a traveling pet clinic that will go down there and catch as many stray cats as they can, spay or neuter them, and then you deal with the ones you have but the population stays in check.
Well that photo of the fox getting shot doesn’t help the image either. But I understand that was rabid fox…
Well, it didn’t test to be rabid. It was behaving abnormally, we heard reports — although we never made a case — that it’d been captured north of Bonner Bridge and released down there. I can say from a lot of experience with canids, more with coyotes and wolves and out west — and I used to be a bear capture technician at a couple of different places, and have free-range darted coyotes and black bears — that fox was not behaving normally. It was out in a crowd of people in broad daylight. And the issue is: at what point do you treat it as risk to the public? And I was there on the spot when the decision was made — and it wasn’t the moment it was seen, it was after it was observed for a while. That wasn’t a normal situation. That was not a fox behaving normally. So whether it was sick, it’s hard to say.
But it wasn’t even a bird-related shooting. So why do people latch on to it? In some ways is this just a PR battle?
Well, I would say it’s a very polarizing issue. All parties involved have their public relations campaigns — some would call it spin; some call it propaganda. We encounter misinformation repeatedly. Some parties have more ability than we do to spread information. So rumor control is a challenge. Unfortunately, I think the public is misled. We get calls in the summer: “I hear everything’s closed.” And someone walks the people through the Google Earth map and it’s like, “Gee there’s a lot of places open.” And in the past few years we’ve tried to measure how many miles are closed on a weekly basis, and I can tell you, the peak closures over the peak breeding season tend to be mid-May to mid-June. And then it starts to reverse. And by mid-July, many things are fully reopen. Not every single thing. But it follows a predictable pattern. Our goal is to put out information so people can plan around that.
How does the current plan compare to what was before? Is it more closures? Last winter we could still park at S-Turns, but here it says it’s pedestrian — or is that just below the waterline?
What’ different his year is the plan has designated ORV routes. If it’s not a designated ORV route then it’s a “vehicle-free area” or pedestrian area. So, that was one of the key things we failed to do before which put us in legal jeopardy of not being allowed to provide ORV use. The park service regulations say you have to designate them out in special regulations. So these are the designated routes. Just south of Rodanthe pier north, originally the park service had 500 feet of ocean front; and then the village boundary, you can see people developed right up to that boundary. So much of that has eroded. Just like S-Curves. So the park service jurisdiction has narrowed down to just the intertidal zone north of Rodanthe Pier. So our feeling was, it’s hard to justify allowing ORV use in an area that’s underwater.
Is some of that also being generous; recognizing the fact that if you grant ORV access here, you’d have to take it from someplace else? So if you’re gonna make a place ORV, you want to make sure those people benefited?
There’s some truth to that. I mean, there was an attempt to balance the miles a bit. But, anyway, that’s what the blue and green miles are about. On the resource protection side, under the interim plan and under the consent decree, we did pre-nesting areas for piping plover at the inlets and at Cape Point and South Beach. There were no pre-nesting areas designated for American oystercatchers and colonial waterbirds. Under the plan, there are pre-nesting areas for American oystercatchers and colonial water birds. American oystercatchers, have what is called strong site fidelity. The same pair will come back and nest at the same site year after year. Under the consent decree we would monitor those areas a lot, because we knew they were coming back, and as soon as they came back and demonstrated some kind of breeding behavior, the consent decree required we put up the buffer. And the same areas tended to close. They’re very predictable. So under the plan, we looked at the nesting history over the past five years and the current habitat conditions — the staff went out to look and see and if those areas had good nesting habitat — if they did, the plan calls for a pre-nesting area. So what’s new with this “pedestrian shoreline access”? Under the consent decree — when there were pre-nesting areas at some of the points, or inlets, it was often a complete shoreline closure. Because when the consent decree was implemented it froze the pre nesting areas to be the same to maximum extent possible as of 2008. So we had areas where no birds nested, yet we had to put up a pre-nesting area. The new plan is more adaptable. We’ve identified areas where we think it’s likely for those birds to nest; it’s a proactive way of protecting that habitat so it’s available. But to hedge our bets, in case they don’t show up, the pedestrian shoreline access allows that use until they show up. Now, we’ve had confusion on the wording of our signs, so we’re looking into that…
Well, “leave no footprints” does sound extreme. Even if the intent was to be more flexible.
Well, the intent was to be more flexible. Frankly, from the management responsibility and the legal liability point of view, it’s a calculated risk to let people into what is known and identified as sensitive nesting habitat. So this provision of the plan was our way of managing that. It came up in negotiation rulemaking discussion that if you let people in those kinds of areas, you can’t take a chance that a dog’s off leash. Kites are a big problem, typically with piping plover. The recovery plan recommends a 200-meter kite buffer around piping plover enclosures. And so one could argue that we’re not being that strict, because we say no kites within or over the airspace of the piping plover closure. And our feeling is if we have good compliance, it will work.
That’s the big “if” about the new plan. In order to evolve to some future change in buffers, we have to have good compliance. The purpose of the buffers is to reduce the chances of human disturbance. That part of it has proven effective during the consent decree. Is that reduction of disturbance the sole reason there’s been increase in nesting numbers? You can argue that either way. There’s multiple factors every year. So the intention is we hedged our bets. We wanted to allow use of those areas as long as we could. And because the pre-nesting areas get left in place until a certain date — because that’s the best habitat — if for some reason birds don’t show up later on, we wanted to at least have that shoreline access to reopen. And if we call the whole thing pre-nesting area, it doesn’t open up until July 31. So it’s a bit mystifying as to why people are so upset. Upon reflection of the wording, I can see why the wording has confused people, so we’re gonna address that.
But birds are there now anyway, right? So the signs have gone.
Several areas the birds are already here, so those pedestrian shoreline access areas are closed as prescribed by the plan. But there are other ones where the birds aren’t there yet. But it’s actually a good thing if the birds arrive and get settled early, because if they nest successfully on their first attempt and have chicks, they won’t re-nest again. If they lose a nest because of disturbance — they abandon it, it gets predated by gulls; or they lose chicks immediately after hatching for whatever reason – most of these species will renest again, and again, two or three times that year. Which means the season is that much longer. What we’ve seen under the consent decree is not only an increase in the number of pairs for piper plover, but a reduction in the number of renest attempts.
So do you feel like the new plans is more restrictive or less restrictive than the consent decree?
Well, the consent decree modified the interim strategy by adding the buffers and the nighttime restriction. Neither one of those designate ORV routes, so neither one of them passed the muster for that legal requirement of designating the routes. They provided a resource protection. So, in that regard, any objective person would say the plan has additional management layers, which you would call restrictive. It has a different, but similar version of the resource protection measures. It’s made more things regulation— the park service has the authority to post a speed limit and change the sign. In the ORV rule, it permanently designated what the limit is unless otherwise posted.
So, it has more rules in place, which is inherently more restrictive. But as far as the miles open and closed, how do they compare?
My calculated guess or judgment is the plan this year will play out in the breeding season similar to what has happened in these last four years. The birds tend to come back to the same places. You know, their arrival date can be different; they can nest down the beach a quarter mile from where they were before. Colonial water birds have a little less site fidelity. But from now until mid May, maybe late May, there will be an increase in the number of nests. New arrivals; new breeding behavior; new closures. There will be a peak period, generally mid June or so, where the maximum amount of resource closures are in place. In recent years, it’s only been a week or two where there’s been anything less than 50 miles open. Now, some of those miles, again, will be hard to get to — which is why we’re designing a plan with new access points. If you have an ORV route that’s 3 miles long and only has one access point – and you get to a nest within a ¼ mile of that access, you can’t get to it . . .
That’s why everyone’s frustrated.
So we need to build redundant accesses for routes so if one gets blocked you can get to the rest of it from the other one. That’s not going to happen this season. We’re doing the planning to start constructing next winter. So, hopefully, we’ll see some of the access points by summer of 2013.
What about monitoring spoil islands? When people take issue with the bird population number, they always point out that the spoil islands aren’t taken into account.
The park service has no responsibility for any of the spoil islands. The only island we have any responsibility for is Green Island, which is on the southwest side of Oregon Inlet. That’s a natural small island; or sand spit. Where we do get nesting, that’s the only one. The spoil islands are mostly managed by the NC Wildlife Resource Commission. A few further south in the state are managed by Audubon. We tried to initiate a discussion with those entities about counting birds at the same time — if they do their surveys while we do ours, then at least we’re not double counting. It’s been a little challenging to coordinate it. The people at the other agencies agree in principal but they have staffing and timing issues; they can’t necessarily do their counts the same day we do ours. There was a lot of discussion during reg neg on that. It is of interest ecologically to know where those birds are. In some ways, it’s beyond my control, the park service’s control. I can’t make those other agencies count when we count. And the bottom line is: the park service has responsibility for the wildlife on our seashore. I can’t say the seashore is a sacrificial zone, that we won’t protect our wildlife here because there’s plenty of them out on the spoil islands. I’ve read reports from the state that say, overall, some of the species are in decline statewide and coastwide, and so everybody has to play their part. But just as a fundamental legal responsibility and obligation, the park service has to — under the Organic Act and all these other laws — we have to protect the wildlife on the seashore.
If I think back on comments, public comments, on the EIS or on the proposed rule, they are very polarized. And whether it’s Southern Environmental Law Center and National Audubon or the OBPA or NCCBBA, we saw valid points on both sides. But many points were conflicting. One side wanted us to be more restrictive, the other wanted us to be less restrictive. Figuring out how to put that into a practical management plan — not aimed at pleasing everybody but aimed at providing effective resource protection and diverse visitor opportunities, trying to meet the purpose and need of the plan — is very difficult. In the beginning of the planning document under NEPA, the reason for doing the plan is described in the Purpose and Need Statement, and that is the ultimate test of the final decision is does it meet the purpose and need. And purpose and need can be complicated, ours was: we want to allow for appropriate ORV use; we want to protect resources unimpaired for future generations; we want to allow for diverse visitor experience opportunities, which in some ways boils down to some areas open for ORVs some not. And people can pick and choose what they want to do and where they want to go. And then when they get there, there’s a range of things they can do. We tried not to say, this is the kiteboarding site and this is the surfing site and this is the walking your dog site. But what is common, when we get nesting birds, primarily, and turtles, those areas — regardless of whether it’s ORV use or pedestrian — have restrictions.
When you take all this input in — twenty thousand comments or what have you — was it weigh everything equally? Did local opinion way more? Did congressional opinion weigh more?
There’s some common principles in how comments under the National Environmental Policy Act are to be reviewed. It’s not a vote. So numbers may be interesting, but if you get 10,000 comments that are saying, “I’m for no ORV restrictions” or saying “I’m for eliminating ORVs,” that’s technically almost a non-substantive comment. I mean, we decided in the purpose and need that we’re allowing ORVs; we’re not trying to eliminate them, but we need to restrict them sufficiently to manage conflicts with other users and resource protection. So those were typically lumped into what’s considered but dismissed from further evaluation.
But where we have detailed comments — “I don’t like permits, but if you do permits, I think you ought to do it this way” — those are looked at. Frankly, when you have a very polarized issue, you get comments all around the target. Some are on the target and some are not. So you try to figure out, if we do it this way based on these comments, that’s one item, but it’s a complicated plan with many items in it. So we have to look at how does it work as a whole. People are surprised and disappointed that we didn’t just do it the way they wanted. It’s not as simple as that. For example, it was clear in negotiated rulemaking and the early public scoping sessions that Cape Point is an important access area for fishermen, for surfers, for people who like it out there. And ORV access is of value. You had some constituents that wanted all the inlets, and points and Cape Point closed to ORVs. We decided, okay, we’re gonna have some inlets and points open to ORVs, some not, and some that may be seasonal. And we frankly, kind of split the baby in half. And that kind of input led us to believe that east side of Cape Point is the best access to get to Cape Point. And generally — it’s been closed for a few months during the consent decree, but it’s been more likely to be open than approaching Cape Point from the west. So we have to take those definitive but polarized opinions and, respecting those two points of view, find something that is appropriate. Ultimately, the park service is responsible for making a management decision. We consider the public comments, we consider what’s been defined as purpose and need, and try to come up with a plan we think accomplishes that. And on offroad vehicles or snowmobiles or a few other hot button issues in the park system, it’s going to be very polarized.
With talk of wintering populations and stuff, might access decrease? Because once it’s in place, it’s done. And I know one comment response basically said, “We can’t seasonally open stuff as easy as we can seasonally close it.”
I would say there’s more flexibility on the resource protection side than the ORV designated route side. It was a regulatory requirement that the designated routes be spelled out. Some comments thought we should be more fluid and flexible about designating routes, in essence saying the whole seashore should be a designated route and the superintendent should decide “This is the route today” and that doesn’t fly as meeting that regulatory requirement. On the other hand, there were some suggestions that we not lock in resource closures — and I don’t think we did — for the wintering birds. Some people thought we didn’t need to do anything for wintering birds; some people thought we needed to be more ambitious in protecting shoreline for wintering birds. The way our plan worked out, if it’s a particularly sensitive habitat, it could be a small resource closure and I can tell you what we had in place this past winter before the plan went into effect: is a little bit of the mud flats on the sound side of South Point, Ocracoke; and a little bit of the mudflats at Bodie Island spit. Everywhere else it might have been an ORV closure, but it was open to pedestrians. If you have remote areas and other management overlays, where there’s designated routes or something else reduces the number of people in the area then we can be less restrictive about the closures. Some people would argue either way you’re reducing the use in the area; other people would argue, that’s the point: these are sensitive areas; some of these are considered critical habitat for wintering plovers. To get to the bottom line: it’s hard to know the exact right thing to do in a complicated and contentious issue like this. So we tried to build in some flexibility so it can evolve. If we can learn about buffers and come up with documentation that smaller buffers for piping plover chicks would be effective here, then we have the ability to move in that direction.
Why no daily rate on the beach permits? I think a lot of the outrage was having to pay so much right at the start.
Well you have to understand that it’s a special use permit and a cost recovery program. We issue all kinds of special use permits for other activities, like weddings, which typically last a few hours. The going rate on a wedding permit is $100. And because of the administrative costs of issuing a permit, our feeling was the administrative cost of issuing a permit for a day instead of week wasn’t going to be 1/7 of the weekly permit. It would’ve been a significant cost that increased our workload, etc. So the bottom line is a daily permit could easily have cost 50% or more of the weekly; so we felt like it was just a better value. It was simpler for us as well as the visitors. I mean, I suppose there are people who just want to go out there one day; but during the discussion the focus seemed to be on weekly stuff since most people rent a cottage for a week. And they’re probably going out for more than one day. So it was decided based on efficiency. The fee was based on how much we needed to recover to provide the additional program services and oversight. If you compare the permit cost here to Cape Cod or Assateague it’s similar. Cape Cod’s is higher. When we developed the fee the annual fishing pass for one person at Jennette’s Pier was $300 and $65 for the week. So our price is still a good value.
Shuttling and water taxis are possibilities mentioned in the doc. I never saw it come up in the reg neg, but…
It was discussed in subcommittees. Some of the conservation groups were pushing it because they’d seen it happen elsewhere. There was quite a bit of disdain on the ORV side; I think if you’re used to driving anywhere you want, it’s hard to make the leap and concede to the possibility that that might be beneficial. The park service has already begun to follow up on that. We had a technical assistance team of transportation planners come and look at the situation and they’re going to provide us with a report. I think the focus of what we’re looking at is at the Spit or Cape Point. If the end of the spit or Cape Point isn’t closed but you can’t get there because there’s nesting closures before you get there, is there a way to shuttle people so you can get around it that works for the birds as well as for the people. In the short term, there may not be an easy way to do it, but in the long run it’s something I think we’ll continue to look at.
Let me ask you this: do you think Walker Golder’s getting as much heat from his people as the access people are? Do you think they feel like it’s a success?
I don’t know how Walker feels because I don’t see him or talk to him. It’s unfortunate that people feel like there’s winners or losers here. If we try to envision the future, 10 to 15 years from now, what I’d like to see happen — and it remains to be seen; can’t predict the future — is that nesting populations are thriving here. That people have adapted around the seasonality and they’re used to the recreational opportunities. That we’ve been able to revise parts of the plan based on adaptive management so that things that people think are burdensome now will seem less burdensome. If we can justify it. And that’ the big “if.” Visitor understanding of the rules and willingness to comply with the rules will help determine how much flexibility we can have in the future.
What would’ve happened if you said, “Screw it. We’re doing it the other way?” Because I think some people think we can return to the old way. Could the park service said: it’s the old way. Or would it just mean more lawsuits?
I think if you read chapter one of the plan, particularly the purpose and need, it’s very clear that the park service thinks that the way it used to be is not legally defensible. Legal defense is a theory until it’s tested in court. But the park service chose a plan we think is justifiable, legally defensible. Based on the best available science, it meets the requirements of the executive orders and the other laws and regulations that apply and goes and meets the purpose and need of the plan.
How close are to where you can say, “That’s over.”
From the park service point of view the rule’s being implemented. The lawsuit has to be resolved, but the plan’s being implemented. There’s a lot of steps and hearings until it can be a law. And people can comment and submit testimony. All that’s beyond my control. What’s under my control is implementing the plan on a day-to-day basis. So that’s what we’re doing.
I read a quote by Bill Harris that said, ‘I feel like I lost every friend over this issue.” I’ve hard about rangers not being served in restaurant and stores. What’s it been like for you the past 7 years?
It’s been very challenging professionally. And I would’ve loved to have found a solution that everybody loved. And short of that, I was hoping the negotiated rulemaking committee could agree to some common ground that the park service could use as the final basis for the preferred alternative. Frankly, at the end of the day, they couldn’t agree to almost anything. Or they wouldn’t agree formally to this point or that point, even if it seemed like things you think they would agree to. So it’s a good lesson in trying to resolve conflict that is very polarized. I don’t know what the lesson learned is, other than that I wish the park service had completed the plan back in the 70s. But people should not be misled into thinking that would’ve solved everything. In 1978, when the draft plan was published, loggerhead turtles were listed as a threatened species but piping plover were not listed until the early 1990s. So even parks that did their plans in the 80s had to change it and make it more restrictive later. What would it be like today if that plan and regulation had been finished? Hard to say. I can tell you it’s much harder to wait until the bottom of the ninth inning when things are perceived — at least by one side with a lot of legal arguments on their side — who feel like things are out of hand.
It’s been difficult. I have a very dedicated staff. Some of them are not treated well in the field. That’s unfortunate. We try to be professional and objective about doing our job. But frankly, a big part of the problem is the opposing sides don’t seem to recognize there’s other people out there who don’t think the same way you do. The ORV people feel like it should go back to the old days, and there’s a lot of people who disagree with that. If they could’ve found a way to incorporate and collaborate with pedestrian access folks during the reg neg, that would’ve been a powerful coalition. But when you look at ORV recommendations for routes and areas, there’s very, very little year-round designated pedestrian areas. And so the pedestrians aligned themselves with the conservationists. Too bad it’s about taking sides; it should be about what’s best for the park. And certainly, having visitors who can enjoy themselves here and be future advocates for the park, that’s important. It’s unfortunate if we lose one faction of visitors who don’t like what we’re doing. I think everyone needs to understand that the park is here for multiple purposes: not just beach driving, not just recreation. Look at the enabling legislation: “the park should be administered, developed and preserved in accordance with the Organic Act. No development or plan for the convenience of visitors shall be undertaken that would be incompatible with the protection or preservation of the unique flora and fauna.” So we need to meet multiple objectives to be successful.
The plan is complicated. And it may be hard for people to envision that there is some flexibility built in for adaptive management. I don’t mind being judged on facts on how things work out. In some ways, it feels like we’re being overly prejudged from the point of view of fear and hysteria in some cases. And in my mind the plan has some flexibility that will let it evolve over time as we learn from its successes and its failures.
My feeling is if we don’t manage the use and conserve resources adequately, it would be very difficult to justify allowing it. The executive order says you have to close ORV use if you can’t manage its impacts. I’m paraphrasing, but it’s along those lines. So I’d argue that’s what we’re trying to do. People can judge how well we’re doing that, but we needed a plan that worked together in total. And if you loosen up something here you have to tighten something up someplace else.
There was a thoughtful reason for every part of the plan. In an ideal world, when people are a passionate about a place like Cape Hatteras, I’d like to think we can figure out compromise we can all live with. But in this case it’s been extremely challenging. In the negotiated rulemaking the way I interpreted the outcome is the polarized sides couldn’t agree to a compromise and they left the park service to come up with the compromises. And neither one of them likes it a lot. You can argue one side likes it more than the other, and that’s probably a fair argument at this point. But when I read comments from those parties, I still see a lot of criticism of what we’re doing, even from the environmental side of it.
What’s that they say? A true compromise is when nobody walks away happy.
If that’s true, then maybe the plan’s in the right spot.
Anything else you’d like to say?
The last thing I can think of is there’s a lot of negativity out there about the plan. And it seems like it’s a byproduct of a lot of people think it’s worse than it is. Even during the consent decree we had calls everyday during the summer season saying, “I hear everything’s closed.” And then they hear what’s open and they say, “Oh that’s not so bad.” On the other hand, if they call and want to go to Cape Point on July 1. Based on the nesting history, we’d tell them it’s typically not open so they can plan around it. Our goal is put out accurate information so they can decide what to do.
_________________________________________________________________________
Issue 1.1: FOOD FOR THOUGHT
After four years of financial dieting, Dare County’s school budget is skin-and-bones. Education Chair Ben Sproul discusses why now’s the time to cough up more dough.
Pop quiz! What’s $1.3 million divided by 30,000? Easy, right? $43.33. What’s not so easy is securing that money in a recession. When Dare County’s Board of Education asked for help in filling last year’s school budget shortfall, they were denied for two primary reasons: 1) the county had maintained their commitment to schools by not cutting dollars the past four years; and 2) local kids receive more money per student than anywhere in the state. But, just like everything else, it turns out school funds have to work a little harder on the Outer Banks — a fact even the commissioners addressed later by finding an extra $350,780 to avoid losing personnel. This spring, the BOE will plead its case again in an even tougher climate. We sat down with Chairman Ben Sproul to find out how the math works, what’s at stake, and what you can do to help.
The following interview represents the full conversation of the edited version that printed in Outer Banks Milepost Winter ‘11/12 issue. — Ed
How’d you end up on the school board?
It’s an interesting story. I was standing on the top of a mountain getting ready to go snowboarding, and my phone rang. It was Skip Saunders who was getting ready to come off the school board, but he didn’t want to leave with no prospects of who was going to run. I was already doing stuff — the planning board, the restaurant association, CASA — I was probably doing too much stuff. But I’ve got kids in school. And it was like, “You can really make a difference.” So he and a few other people talked me into it. And fortunately, I ran uncontested so I won — against nobody! [laughs] But it wasn’t a tough decision. And now I realize it suits me.
How so?
I tell my partner, Steve [Pauls], all the time that the job is a lot like the job here [at the Pit]: it’s managing people; it’s dealing with conflicts at 2am. But I’m the kind of person who needs a challenge and likes to bang around complicated ideas, and there’s a lot of complicated things that go on in trying to steer a ship that size. And while you can’t run education like a business, there are certain parts that benefit from having that background. The big picture things and the challenges of how to manage with a declining budget — we’ve had to do that here. It’s not been rosy anywhere for anyone. It’s a challenge trying to convince the county [to increase funding] among all of their priorities. And it’s been a good experience to stretch my mind in that direction of how are you going to allocate these resources and how can you put pressure politically to increase the value of education and how can you work with the organizations that lobby at the state level. So it’s been very interesting and educational for me. A lot of my job now is educating people on how it works. Because we have a fantastic staff who do a great job in a tough situation. But the public doesn’t realize how and why stuff happens.
What a perfect segue. You say we need more money, but critics say $10,000 per student is more than any county in the state gets and the schools need to use it more wisely.
Do you know why that’s not true? Well, the figure is true in a technical sense. And it’s a figure to be proud of, because it shows we invest in our kids. Part of the reason that won’t buy as much as in another system is our geographic set up and the decision ten years ago to have three high schools in an area with only 5000 students. Now, there are benefits to that — like smaller class sizes and shortening the time parents and kids spend getting to school — but it comes at a cost. First, it’s inherently less efficient than, say, 5000 kids at one school. Everything’s all together and you don’t have to travel. Second, the DPI – Department of Public Instruction at the state level — has a bunch of rules about what they will and won’t fund. And, staffing-wise, the state doesn’t pay for another principal, or vice-principal or guidance counselor at a third high school. So we are going to pay those things out of local funds forever. And you can go and dissect those numbers a bunch of different ways.
So they made an investment decision 10 years ago to build schools we didn’t’ have to.
Didn’t have to? That’s sort of a judgment call. The argument against building and spending the money is: can’t you bus kids around? But in order to do that, you’d have to say, this portion of Wanchese or Manteo are going to get bussed over to Nags Head Elementary. And in order to offset it, the line for Kitty Hawk Elementary would have to move farther south to grab more people so Nags Head would be the right size. You can see how there would be a huge downside to that for those families.
And that’s another interesting topic that’s important right now. All the schools have a design; a target of maximum number of students. Right now we’re in a fiscal situation where are classroom size is getting higher because we’re just not getting the money. We used to have a lower than average classroom size. We’re getting closer and closer to the maximum classroom size. Now, you can go over that somewhat until you hit a legal limit, which is when you really have to bus kids around to make things work. We’re in a situation now where we have a little extra room at Kitty Hawk but we’re a little over design capacity in Manteo Elementary. If you use all the boilerplate design criteria, we need six more classrooms in that school to get the classroom size down as low as we like. But that’s the rub: in Manteo, there’s nobody sitting in the hallways; there’s nobody in trailers. It doesn’t look dire. But the numbers bear out: it’s time to build. But everyone knows it’s not a perfect distribution of schools with population.
You probably don’t want to get into this, but there’s also a certain reputation that certain schools have for being better than others, and a perception that the parents of those kids would like to maintain that.
What’s your perception of that? Because I might have a different take.
Well, if you were to ask me what the going popular perception is for elementary schools north of Oregon Inlet, the average person would rank them: Kitty Hawk, First Flight, Nags Head, Manteo. Now that may not to be an educated perception, but that’s what you’d hear. I’d also suggest you’d that the overall perception is that people in Kitty Hawk and Southern Shores would love to keep it that way.
Well, fortunately for us, outcomes — which is what we call them — are not very different from one school to the other. And they’re all fairly high. And people are always gonna try and rank stuff. And it isn’t because the school is particularly better or worse, or that staff is particularly better or worse. I think we have a great education community that shares ideas and all support each other. It’s not dysfunctional like I see in a lot of other schools when I travel. However, there is a direct correlation — and I don’t think anyone would dispute it — between socioeconomic demographics and achievement: i.e., if you have books at home, you’re more likely to do well in school. Or if you have a parent that’s involved you’re more likely to do well in school. . . .
If you grow up in a household where college is expected, you’re more likely to go.
And we have a lot of great programs that really help address that. Like the AVID program. And we’d like to expand that and move it up father up into middle school, but in these budgetary times we’ve had to stop expanding it. But the outcomes for that program are fantastic; a really high rate of the participants are going to college. But back to the elementary level, my wife was president of the PTO for three years at our school and it was a struggle to get volunteers, it was a struggle to raise money. Whereas, you could see up at Kitty Hawk huge gaggles of people out helping run events. And they raised a ton more money. And you can see that.
Plus, when you look at the statistics, a lot of our schools are Title One schools so they get a little extra money from the federal government, just because a lot of our kids are close to the poverty line or at the poverty line. And the number they look at is the percentage of kids on free and reduced lunch. Which is 42% now for the whole county. We were at 26% in 2006. That’s a huge dip. But in Kitty Hawk, it’s still 25%. That means the number’s even bigger further south.
So the number of people of parenting age who are at or close to poverty level now is staggering, but it’s not talked about, because everyone around here is so resilient. If you’re still here, you’re like, “Chin up, we’re gonna get through this.” But that doesn’t mean its not more challenging for the teachers. Because when there’s food insecurity, it’s harder to learn. And we’re sending home 700 backpacks filled with food every weekend, because that’s how many kids qualify for it. And a lot of those kids, that’s making or breaking being hungry. That’s a serious issue. We come from an area where we see beautiful mansions everywhere, and it can make you forget that our socioeconomic status is not that much better than anywhere else.
To me that’s one of the bigger discrepancies. Because when I look at that $10k per student number what I think is, “Well, it’s not paying for teachers.” Because a starting salary is like $28k. There are bus boys on this beach who make more.
It’s hard to live on this beach for that much money. And the percentage of teachers here who work all summer has to be up there.
And that doesn’t happen in other areas. The starting salary for a California teacher when I was there was $50,000. Here it takes 15 years to make $40,000 dollars. And that’s more than most people will be willing to put up with. But that’s decided by the state. How does the county work in terms of funding? And who’s responsible for making decisions? Is it you? The superintendent?
As a whole, neither one of us has a whole lot of leverage to deal with money coming in. The way it’s set up is sort of like check-and-balance. The idea is you have a finance officer and a superintendent, who are running the second biggest employer in the county: we’ve got 11 schools, 700 plus employees and an approximately $50 million budget, roughly 85% of which goes to teachers. The county basically flat-lined us at around $19 million four years ago.
Our board reviews the big top tier decisions that are made about the budget, policy, legal issues, that the professional staff is doing. But we’re mostly looking over the books and budget amendments and making sure there’s no malfeasance. And then on a policy level we have an attorney who is interpreting the rules coming down from the state. But basically: we hire one employee. The superintendent. And the superintendent hires other people who hire other people. But everything goes all the way up through us.
But it’s very complicated in terms of funding. In fact, the state has this formula where they say: “We’re gonna fund this many salaries.” And then you tell the state, “These are the salaries we’re gonna pay.” So we hand pick which teachers the county pays for and which ones the state pays for— and that will be the most expensive employees. And if someone at the bottom works their way up through accreditation and so forth, they might get a check form the county one year and the next year get a check from the state. So every month, the finance department is shucking-and-jiving to squeeze the most out of every dollar or every position we get. But even if the funding stays the same each year, the cost of health care and benefits go up. And all the low-hanging fruit has been cut over the past four years. In fact, the only reason we got an extra $350,000 from the county last year was by making the argument, “You say we’re not getting a cut, but it still translates into a cut in teachers.“ Because if the price of health benefits goes up so much for these 50 employees, suddenly we only get 49 employees. So we talked them into the cost of employing the same amount of people.
At least they did much. Who puts the budget together?
The budget is put together by professionals for a lot of professional reasons. They’re trying to manage all these priorities, such as classroom size. Let’s say you’re only allowed to have 18 kids in a classroom, and you have 36 kids. You have two teachers. But let’s say you get a 37th kid, you have to hire another teacher — but you’re only getting paid for one extra kid. You’re only getting a state allocation of $6000 or $7000 dollars. But you still have to hire a whole ‘nother teacher. Now, when you’ve got 20 kindergarten classes, [shuffling an extra kid] isn’t that big of a deal, but in a small system there’s a lot more volatility.
That’s interesting. Because most parents think, “Yea! Smaller class!” But in reality, one extra kid might suck $20,000 out of the budget.
And what takes the brunt of these things is the stuff that isn’t required, but you still want to have, like high level high school classes like advanced calculus or advanced science class. Because we can’t financially hire a teacher to teach three people — that doesn’t make any sense because that wouldn’t be fair to the rest of the students. That’s why Virtual Public High School is — well, it’s the way of the future really — but it’s is great for small systems like ours because the school can pay something like $600 per year or $350 a semester for those classes. And you have a top tier teacher on a computer screen giving a class and answering questions.
So that’s $600 per year per student?
Something like that. The breaking point statistically is — on average — if you have 15 or fewer students it would be cheaper to put them in virtual public high school for that class. If it’s 16, it’s cheaper to get yourself a teacher to teach it. And now there’s a demand to take Mandarin and things like that. But when you start out, you never have 15 kids who want to take Mandarin — you start out with 3 or 5. But apparently every student who’s ever taken the virtual Mandarin class has passed and gotten credit for it.
So is that implemented now?
We have it in small doses. Some people think it’s too expensive. And it would be nice if it would cost less. But that is controlled at the state level and it’s been super successful and grown really fast despite the pricing they currently have. But it’s certainly worthy of advocacy on the state level to do more. Because if you have 56 kids in a class like Cape Hatteras, what percentage is going to what to take AP Physics? It’s going to be three. That problem only gets you 3 times father up at First Flight, because the class is only three times bigger. So you only have so many classes you can break it up into before it won’t mathematically work. And just like any decision you make in business, certain things have to come in front. But I think we’re very good at accommodating people as much as possible. And if you have a kid who needs to be challenged in chemistry, if you have an ongoing dialogue with your principal and your guidance counselor and say: Where’s this going to be a year or two years from now? I think you can work out a plan.
That’s the downside of having a smaller school system and smaller classes . . .
You don’t have that breadth of different classes. But we still have a really high ratio of kids taking AP classes and college credit classes. There’s a whole bunch of kids how have their freshman year done before they graduate.
So how does that get implemented more? Because, for me it comes down to the same issues that plague the Outer Banks in general. It’s a small community — a rural community, in fact — with not a lot of money endemically, but with a lot of money flowing through it. So we’re not the power brokers. I guarantee you, if the people who rented these houses up and down the beach lived here, we’d have the most sophisticated schools you can imagine. If you visit here, you’d think we had heaps of money. Because that’s the image we portray. But if you moved here form Jersey, you’d be shocked to find we don’t have some of the things you might expect.
Or might be used to.
It almost sounds like we got into the same situation as the rest of America ten years ago: we bought too much house. Or, to be more specific, too much school. Is that factored into the cost-per-student number as well?
No. That’s totally separate. Has nothing to do with the buildings. That’s if you’re teaching outdoors. And the way I imagine it — and this is just me; nobody else has said this to me — but if you have a few hundred million dollars in buildings and they last 50 years, you’d want to build them every five years and spread it out. Instead, we built the vast majority of our square footage inside of 10 years. The problem is, 50 years from now there will be a ten-year stretch where we’re really trying to replace buildings. And of course, we want them to last longer than 50 years, but you see how that can be a problem.
Because all the upkeep will happen in the same time frame. But we needed something bigger, too. I’m assuming the reason we built more elementary schools was to accommodate more students.
It hasn’t been as big as people think. There’s been some shifts. And they have some very sophisticated modeling to figure out what they think is going to happen. But Manteo had a surprising jump in elementary school numbers the past five years. More than everybody expected.
What’s the modeling look like five years from now? I know our population isn’t booming.
Even though our population has been stagnant, our kid population has grown. But what a lot of people don’t realize is a lot of it is churn. You start out with say, 5000 students in fall. And then you do a count in February and enrollment is down by — I don’t know, 75 kids. And they go “Oh, that’s three classrooms you don’t’ need.” And we say, “Don’t worry: by April we’ll be above 5000.” Because people turn over in the winter here. Kind of like military families all move in summer; tourist destinations it happens in the middle of the school year.
Moving back you always hear, “schools are great.” How do our schools rate countrywide?
We’re in the top five counties in the state in lowest dropout rate and highest on-time graduation rate — over 90%. I think we’re the only county that’s been above 90% in on-time graduation — that means in four years — for three years in a row. So we’re really good at graduating kids. Now some people will say, “That’s because you don’t let anyone drop out.” Well that’s kind of a good thing because if you get that diploma there’s all sorts of good things for the community long-term. I’m sure you’ve heard the phrase, “Educate ‘em or incarcerate ’em.” Actually, we’ve had a big philosophical change. Fifteen years ago, we had one of the very highest dropout rates. It used to be, “if they don’t want to be here let them just drop out and cause a ruckus.” Now it’s, “Let’s educate every kid.” And we have a bunch of programs designed to keep them from seeing dropping out as the only option. So, that’s a good thing.
Other statistics: something like 80% of our kids takes the SATs, and we have over 1000 as an average. And the number of kids going to college is really high. The other thing that’s tough is people say, “Big deal. Isn’t North Carolina like 48th in the nation?” But there’s another poll out there that does a comprehensive comparison of individual high schools throughout the nation. They put in things like graduation rate, SAT scores, GPAs, number of highly qualified teachers. So they have this really robust tool they rate schools with. And all three of our high schools were in the top 5 percent nationally. That’s amazing.
That is amazing. But the fact is America’s schools still underperform on a global level. And even locally we don’t offer things that I had in a Virginia Beach high school 25 years ago. Considering how connected the communities are, that frustrates me. Because, for me, it shouldn’t be, “No child left behind.” It should be, “No child left unchallenged.”
And that’s an important point — and you can find this documented easily — but American schools don’t stack up very well anymore. We don’t produce enough engineers to do the engineering we need done in our own country. And that’s a paradigm shift we have to be able to get into our kids heads: you have to have a brain, you have to work hard. And other countries are willing to do that. That’s the tough part of my job: getting people excited about what we’ve accomplished and, at the same time, going “there’s so much more we can do with more support.” In terms of both people and money.
Well there’s always VoTech.
I know you’re kidding, but Skip Saunders — who preceded me on the board — ran his own construction firm for many years. Now he teaches Construction Technology 1 and 2. And he’s come up with this program where the art students design benches and give the plans to the construction guys; they get the materials donated and make the benches, then sell them to buy more materials. So they get the business experience. The marketing and design experience. The excitement and pride in the product. You have to love teachers who take something to the next level. And that’s happening. It would be nice to be able to expand that into other trades.
Nowadays, trades pay better and are more secure. We were always told to grow up seeking out a white-collar career. But those aren’t sure-bets any more.
When people say “Schools did enough when I was a kid,” I like to point out that 40 years ago 75-85% of jobs you could start out after high school and work you way up. Now days it’s the opposite. It’s like 75% of jobs require specialized post-high school training just to start. And they don’t have a lot of upward mobility.
I’d argue self-reliance and imagination are going to get you farther long term.
Creativity is the big goal that we have here. And continuing to foster an environment where kids feel free enough to be creative is an environment we have to protect. And I think that’s alive and well, luckily. And two things I have to give Sue and her team credit for is – both collaborative learning in students – but also a teaching community where [people share ideas]. Part of the problem with rewarding teachers for good is it teaches them to hide their tricks instead of fostering a better outcome for the whole. There’s a pilot program for the state in Kitty Hawk, and it’s going to be in all the schools, but the idea is when you give a test and you get the results back, it instantaneously tells which kids got what answers right and wrong, then pairs them with the teachers who were more effective on those respective problems. That’s friggin’ brilliant. And those things are coming down the pike right now. So it’s a pretty exciting time to be in education.
So our future is rosy if we can just figure out how to fund it all. The business argument is you need to trim more costs. Have you pretty much trimmed everything?
You should interview Jim Winebarger. He does facilities for us. He’s done an amazing job. Every few months he’s done some huge thing to lower costs. Every time we get new equipment it’s more efficient; we got fluorescent bulbs and new light switches where the lights turn off when you leave the bathroom. All sorts of things.
What about food? People complain about school lunches but that doesn’t come out of the county budget, does it?
Right. You’re either paying for it out of your pocket, or it’s being paid for by the federal government.
I guess someone might argue the $2.25 you pay for your lunch is offsetting someone else’s free lunch.
It’s the other way around. I think the feds give us more money than it costs us to make it, because they give the same amount to every school, and we don’t have the same costs. We don’t pay our lunch ladies the same as they do in California. So the more people who get free and reduced lunch, the better it is for every kid, because we get more money in that pot to buy food with.
Why do you think it’s so hard to convince budget hawks to spend on schools? I’d argue a good school system is good for business because it draws talented people who might move elsewhere.
I hear all the time in the hospital: I chose this hospital for the schools. I know when my parents moved back from Germany, and my dad was going to be stationed at Fort Monroe where the schools were crap, he drove us 30 miles each way to get us to a school that wasn’t. So I know parents make those decisions. And you can make the broad-brush argument — always — that investing in schools is a good long-term investment because it makes a better long-term population. You end up getting more high-income doctors and entrepreneurs moving here because people do make decisions on where to move based on schools.
So what’s the county’s logic when they say not to fund? What do they say?
They say, “We don’t have the money. You’re the best funded in the state.” They’ve closed their mind to it because there’ in a declining budget and they have to cut somewhere.
But there’s a whole separate budget item that’s about $500,000 annually for maintenance — of which we’re now about $1.5 million behind. And at a point you really start to get in to dangerous territory when you don’t keep up with the maintenance of the buildings. You know you can put off painting for a year and it won’t hurt anything. You can put off doing a floor. And the schools are in pretty young shape, but they’re already 10 to 12 years old. But the plan is they have to have certain maintenance done on a certain schedule. And we’re way behind because three years ago, the county stopped putting $500,000 away in that bucket every year. As a matter of fact they went to zero. And then we negotiated to $70,000 and then we negotiated to $100,000. But when you go three years and are short close to $1.5 million, every time you do that new construction maintenance plan, [the amount gets bigger] because they’re piling up. You can only push stuff down the road so far.
It’s like the ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure thing.
Well, they start to get more expensive because — hey, if you’d done that floor three years ago it would’ve cost less than now as well. One reason we had to renovate or build at such a clip ten years ago was because in the ‘70s and ‘80s, they pushed things so far down the road. It t got so bad that it was better to abandon the building and build something new, then to spend so much to fix the old and add onto it. But now you’re starting to see the public notice it. Like the track at Manteo, some of the parents and kids are starting to realize, “Our track’s in such bad state, we can’t hold a meet here. It’s good enough to practice, but not quality enough for meets.” So we get emails about it. And you have tell folks, “This is all public. This is all completely transparent. And this was on the maintenance plan to be refurbished three years ago. And it’s still there. But it’s not at the front of the list; there’s some roofs that are leaking that need to be fixed first.”
So how lacking are we in terms of teaching staff?
We’re better than some other schools. And that’s the whole thing about not letting good be enemy of the great. We have something in the neighborhood of 14 fewer teachers than we did last year. We may have the same amount of money, but that’s how it came out. And a lot of things we’d like to do but didn’t have to, so we got rid of them. And a lot of things that we wanted to expand, we didn’t.
What would you do? What’s first on the list? And does it take a tax increase at this point?
Dave Oaksmith used to say: “Hey, we’re willing to take the hit for asking for the money.” One of the things I like to do for people — whether it’s the town budget or the county budget or the school budget — is say: “Hey, what is it that you want? Let’s figure out how much that costs. Now let’s figure out how much that would cost if we divided it among all 30,000 taxpayers.” You start realizing it’s not that much. My favorite example is recycling. In Kill Devil Hills there’s only 7000 residents. They decided to do a pay-to-play recycling program. So only a small percentage of residents recycles, but we all pay eight or ten dollars a month. A restaurant like mine pays $400 a year. But if the town had said, “We know it’s going to cost more because we’re so far away from the recycling center and we have to transport, we want everyone to have it, let’s split it among all the taxpayers.” It would’ve been $20 a year and every house — even every rental house — would have recycling? Would you take a $20 tax increase a year to get town-wide recycling?
What would I do [for schools]? If I had $100,000 extra, the first thing I’d do is expand Pre-K — what used to be “More at Four” — because even though it’s needs-based it has the most dramatic effect on student achievement for everybody. Because kids who couldn’t afford to go to pre-school don’t hold back the class for years to come. Down the line? That’s why you need a big team of professionals to put together the budget, because you have to take whatever little is extra and figure out how to spread it around. Maybe it’s PE time. Maybe it’s AP classes or foreign language opportunities. We can’t do everything. But there’re ways for the public to have input and we can work together on what the priorities are.
How helpful and involved are local parents as a whole?
I don’t have anything to compare it to. I grew up on military bases; and military parents are very involved, generally speaking. Once you get to high school, you can do the booster club, you can do some things. But elementary school teachers? Boy, they could put parent help to good use. If you could be the mom or dad for kindergarten, first or second grade classroom, that can really help. Fundraising helps, too. But Involvement helps the most, I think.
What is the difference between PTA and PTO? And how much weight are they carrying?
PTA expects thousands of dollar sin national dues; if you’re a PTO you don’t have to pay national dues. They make a significant difference. I know that First Flight Middle School, their budget was in the $20,000 dollar range. So it’s not huge, but it goes along way. And it’s money where the parents can decide, “This is what we want to do with it.” I know that Kitty Hawk’s is much higher, like $60,000 to $80,000. So you talk about the money, but you also talk about the volunteerism that goes with it
So what’s the forecast from the state for next year?
More cuts. Worst yet, they say. Because last year fed programs filled in a bit. Now all that money is expired and there’s going to be another round of discretionary cuts on top of that.
And if the feds are cutting, and the states are cutting, what’s the county saying?
The county says it’s going to be flat again.
And if 85% of that budget is teachers, and you’re already running out of people…
So how many fewer teachers will we have to get by on next year? Well, last year, something like 30 or 40 people moved on, and we only hired 15 people back. So we reduced staffing through attrition. And that’s likely to happen again. Sometimes they get shifted around. It’s a big complicated board game of taking little pieces out of here and there until we get to the right place. And the assistant ratio keeps going down.
Is there a chance they’d have to fire teachers next year?
That depends on how many people retire. If no one retired? Probably. But they call it a RIF — a reduction in force — because you’re not actually firing someone. You just don’t have money to renew their contract.
Really? When I was a kid, RIF stood for “reading is fundamental.”
Isn’t that funny? But that’s what they call it.
Some of the comments on line called you alarmist. How do you respond?
I don’t think it’s alarmist when it is the truth. I mean, it’s nuts and bolts. It’s dollars and cents. You have less dollars, and as expenses go up, you’re going to have less people. You just have to decide where those less people are not going to be next year, in a world where we would like it to be a significant percentage higher.
So when are these decisions made and what can the public do?
The best way to put it — using the business term “level of service” — is if we want the level of service to not get worse, we need to find a way to replace the funds that are being lost. The best way a person can make that happen is to tell their commissioners: a) “I’m willing to pay more taxes, but I want it to go to education”; or b) “I’ve looked at your budget and here are the things I think you should stop funding in favor of education.” Or some combination of those two things. And that’s a lot to ask because I’m sitting on the board and I still don’t understand the county’s budget. [laughs] It’s extremely complicated.
Anything else you’d like to say?
The real takeaway is there’s so much to learn about how it’s done. I’m admittedly a glass-half-full guy; I’m also a guy who generally assumes there’s a logical explanation for things. The best thing is I’m usually right. And I think that there are a bunch of people out there who are interested enough to armchair quarterback and bark on the internet, but not interested enough to go and actually talk to their own principals and teachers. So I’d encourage people to get involved and find out more. And when you go talk to your principal, know that there’s a person who honestly has your child’s best interest at heart. We don’t have any bad principals. I’ll tell you that. Straight up. And we have some fantastic educators. And they love it when parents and citizens are involved and are interested in what’s going on. And they’re happy to tell you how it really works if you don’t really understand. Because the more eyes that are on the ball, the better we’re all gonna be.
______________________________________________________________________________________
ISSUE 0.2: AFTER THE STORM
The extended conversation with Dare County’s leaders regarding reentry and local reaction following Hurricane Irene
In the five days after Irene, local radio stations aired more than 1000 phone calls. Many were residents expressing frustration that Dare County welcomed visitors less than 24 hours after lifting the evacuation. On October 12, a panel of Dare County officials — Commission Chairman Warren Judge, Control Group Chairman Mike Johnson, County Manager Bobby Outten and Public Information Officer Dorothy Toolan — agreed to discuss the re-reentry process and the local reaction. What we discovered is that no group makes every decision; and rumor mills and radio rarely influence policy. The following interview represents the full conversation of the edited version that printed in Outer Banks Milepost Winter ‘11/12 issue. — Ed.
MILEPOST: How does the control group work?
BOBBY OUTTEN: The control group is made up of a representative of the county, each town, the park service and the sheriff. Prior to a hurricane they meet to get an update from emergency management on what the conditions are and what decisions need to be made. And when I say, decisions, it’s typically, ‘Do we need to evacuate?’ Because evacuation involves all municipalities and the county. You have to drive through all the tows to evacuate, so whatever you do impacts every town. So once a decision is made by the control group to evacuate, then you have re-entry decisions to make. And when re-entry is a countywide decision — for example when you have a roadblock at the Wright Memorial Bridge and the Mann’s Harbor bridge — then the control group decides when to remove those because you can’t come into any town without coming through those two checkpoints. But the entry and reentry into any particular town, is a town a decision. For example, in this re-entry when the checkpoints were removed from those bridges, all the towns said, “We’re prepared to accept visitors.” Except Duck. Duck did not allow re-entry. That was a Duck decision; that was not a control group decision. Nags Head can decide what happens in Nags Head, Kill Devil Hills can decide what happens in Kill Devil Hills, Kitty Hawk, Southern Shores, Manteo, all the same. They all have the right to do that. The control group can’t make any one entity do what they want to do in their town.
Has there ever been a conflict because of that?
BO: Well, the purpose of the control group is to avoid that conflict. And that conflict has occurred in the past. Even with there being a control group. But not very often. The point is to make sure everybody’s talking. But that’s how the control group decisions are made. Similarly, Hatteras Island is a Dare County’s decision. The control group doesn’t decide Hatteras Island because you don’t have to go through the towns to do so. It doesn’t impact them one way or the other.
Can one group override the other? I mean can they override their vote?
BO: The control group is a consensus body. There’s no vote. It’s not like everyone can vote and we can control everything. We can’t make them close Nags Head, even if we voted for it. But since I’ve been involved, it gets talked about, decisions are made and everyone’s pretty much on board with the decisions that affect everybody. But the decision to open or close Duck was a Duck decision and we didn’t have any input; just as the decision to open or close Hatteras wasn’t their decision and they didn’t have any impact on that. So those who think the control group has some legal authority or a vote like a board; that’s not correct. It’s a consensus building thing. And the idea is to make sure we’re doing things that make sense for everyone.
Commissioner Johnson, you made the comment at the Sept. 19 meeting that “Decisions aren’t made in a vacuum.” Where else does the input come from beside the people in the room. Is it citizens? Is it law enforcement?
BO: Depends on the situation. During the storm, there’s a decision every 10 minutes. And that determines where you get your information.
MIKE JOHNSON: For example, if it’s during the storm and the question is “Do we want have to have a road block or not?” then we walk over to the support group room and talk with the sheriff’s department and the state troopers, and that decision’s made — “Bam.” — and you go ahead.
But as far as when to re-open or not, how much is reaching out to the community . . .?
MJ: Probably too much [laughs]
BO: Well understand what we’re talking about first of all: to evacuate and close a community you have to have a state of emergency under the statue. So you declare a state of emergency when the storm comes. When the storm is over, you’re looking at emergency management things; is there food, water, shelter power, roads. Is there debris on the roads. Public safety types of issues that justify continuing a state of emergency. When those things no longer exist, where you have power, roads are open, food and water in place. You have EMS available. You can get to people . . .
WARREN JUDGE: Pick up trash . . .
BO: When those things are done you don’t have an emergency anymore. So the question about re-entry or no re-entry isn’t “Can the visitor get his trip insurance?” Or “Is a cottage ready to house people?” It’s more than that. You have to have a reason to be under a state of emergency. If we had a situation tomorrow where there were a bunch of cottages out in a village, we wouldn’t declare a state of emergency unless there was a life threatening situation that required us to do that. So the first thing you do is say “Is there a state of emergency anymore?” And all those things play into it. And while housing is one of those things, it’s not the thing that makes a decision. If you had the bridge go out in June, you wouldn’t close Hatteras Island all summer because there wouldn’t be a state of emergency. And you wouldn’t have the authority to declare a state of emergency, simply because the bridge was out in and of itself. You put that analogy alongside what we have here: and the re-entry decisions become do we have a state of emergency any longer that justifies keeping people of the county. At some point you don’t.
I’ve heard both sides. The litmus test for me was when you were hearing the notifications to boil your water as they were letting tourists back on the island.
BO: But you have to understand, that came after the decision to re-enter had been made.
But would we have known the water was unsafe if we’d waited longer…?
WJ: It was safe when the decision was made.
BO: When the re-entry decision was made there wasn’t a water problem. We made the decision and allowed people back on and then we had a break. We have a break once a month. And we just happened to have it happen hours after a reentry decision.
WJ: It’s probably more like two or three a month. We had one today. On California street in Manteo. And everyone gets a notice: “For these 11 houses, boil your water.” It was just highlighted because of the timing. It was one of those fickle, fate situations.
Because, at the time, you kept hearing “boil your water” on both sides of the bridge; at the same time you had people coming back on. But you’re saying it’s the timing that associated with the storm.
WJ: Absolutely.
BO: But certainly, if you don’t have water, that’s one of those factors. Anytime the water pressure goes below a certain pressure you’re required by the state to put out that notice even if the water tests safe because it’s subject to bacteria growth. So when the line broke and pressure went below that level we had no choice but to put out that advisory. Which we did.
The other complaint was the timing; people wanting more than 24 hours. The evacuation was lifted at 2pm on Sunday; at noon Monday, visitors are coming over the bridge. People felt they didn’t have time to put their lives together. The analogy I heard was: if your mom wanted to come stay the day after Irene, you’d say, give me one more day to get my act together. But, then again, some business owners said they wished they could open immediately.
BO: Well, you just answered your own question. But the towns control that. Once the decision was made by the entire control group not to have roadblocks, then the towns decide what to do. And there was a consensus among towns to open. Except Duck. And the reason Duck decided not to open was they had a road out and couldn’t physically get people there. And they had more damage in the center of town than the other towns did. But that wasn’t our call.
Then the gripe from Duck was that visitors could get there before the people who open up the houses could get ‘em ready. It seemed like that ongoing conflict between business community. Or the way Commissioner Johnson put it at that meeting was “your socioeconomic position, isn’t my socioeconomic position.”
BO: But put it in the context of what we’re talking bout: is it a ‘state of emergency’ that you didn’t have time to clean your house or yard? The only way you can close off the county or town is by virtue of state of emergency. And that’s not one of the things in the statute.
WJ: A week ago, there was a terrible accident in Barco. And no cleaning crews or personnel could get in from Elizabeth City. Anything north or west of Barco. Or they drove all the way around, which made them late. I’d venture to say that it was hard for some rental facilities and hotels to meet 4 o’clock check-in simply because personnel wasn’t showing up until noon or later. Which is the exact same situation — I can’t get my cottage clean and my guests are here — it’s just that this was all wrapped around a very emotional time. And certainly our residents took a beating. Where we live took a beating. And you know what: if I lived on that particular street in a particular town and I couldn’t hardly move because of that traffic, I’d be calling my police chief and asking for help. That’s not something that Mike Johnson was in charge of.
MJ: But even the Duck decision, the way that works is from an emergency management standpoint, the county north of Oregon Inlet is okay to open. We get that from our emergency management, and then it’s my job as control group chairman to call all the mayors: “Okay, north of Oregon Inlet, there’s no state of emergency: what are you guys thinking in your towns? Okay, Duck wants an extra day because they have extra problems; Southern Shore is thinking, ‘I might not be able to get down my streets.’ Okay, well we’re fine in the county: Mann Harbor’s good, East Lake’s good, Wanchese is good, Manteo says we’re good, Kitty Hawk says we’re good, Duck says we need a little more time, and we say “That’s what we’re gonna do; road blocks are open.” Now the problem is when Kitty Hawk say, “We can’t do anything, “ but Duck says “We wanna open.” That’s when the heavy duty negotiations come in.
BO: And Kitty Hawk, in fact, did that during Isabel. We had people from Nags Head who had to go all the way around Elizabeth City to get to Home Depot. But the town has the authority to do that. And the control group can’t change that.
MJ: And that’s why the control group really needs to work together.
Sounds like a lot of decisions are more granular than is currently perceived. If you were listening to that broadcast, a lot of the hostility should’ve been directed a rung or two down.
BO: There’s two kinds of decisions that are made. There are decisions that are made according to a plan — where do you put trucks and take stuff — and that’s made at a staff level. Bigger policy decisions such as evacuation and re-entry are made at a higher level, with the political people being involved as well. So depending on what the decision is depends on where it’s made. And so depending on what your frustrated with determines…
MJ: . . . who you want to throw the tomato at.
So, schools: at first parents were frustrated they had to work and had no place to send their kids. And then, they got mad when the schools opened after 3 days because they’d heard if we missed four days in a row they wouldn’t have to make them up.
MJ: That would be the school board.
BO: But there’s no way you can make these decisions and make everybody happy. Earl wasn’t a bad storm; we had some flooding down south. In Earl, were waited probably a day longer than we could have to make sure the road was in place. And we caught it from the retail community then: “Why did you wait a day, you only worry about the rental community.” So no matter what decisions you make, there’s no in between. If you open quickly the retail side I happy and the rental side is mad; and if you wait, the rental side is happy and the retail side gets mad. So what we have to do is look at it globally and look at it from an emergency management perspective. And if life safety issues are resolved, then we make decisions within reason to re-enter and one side or the other isn’t gonna like it.
MJ: Why don’t you go ahead an show him the buckets of lots we cast. [laughs]
Commissioner Johnson, you made a comment in one meeting about “billionaires worried about their pocketbooks.” What did you mean? Some speculated the county opened quickly so people wouldn’t skip their vacations or cash their insurance.
MJ: It sounds like me . .
WJ: I don’t believe anyone who makes those calls sits around and talks about insurance.
MJ: In the end — the very end — we were trying to incorporate however we could, the timing — and in particular — the wording: you get to Hatteras Island, if you have a ferry reservation. Hoping that if they’d get their insurance if they didn’t have a ferry reservation. But we can’t make decisions predicated on an insurance policy that you bought. We can only do it based on the emergency. And as far as a statement like that, you’re looking at a guy who’d been at it for weeks. And emails and phone calls by the barrel saying: “you idiot.” And not a one of ‘em with one piece of fact in any email for phone call. Nor do they have any idea of how we make that decision. And there comes a time where you go [makes motion like snapping his pencil.]
BO: But in that process, all the things we talk about are balanced to do what our decision makers think are best overall for the county and recognizing somebody’s going to be disappointed and not like what you did. That’s just the nature of the beast. I don’t think there’s been a reentry yet that someone wasn’t disappointed and didn’t like the decision.
MJ: We sit around and make bad decisions; because you already know that: Somebody ‘s going to think it’s a bad decision. But we think that we’re doing it from a educated standpoint that it helps the majority.
DOROTHY TOOLAN: I wonder if there’s anything I can do to educate people about he process of the control group. Because I don’t think people understand there is consensus. Because we operate as a joint information center so all the towns in the county come together when we activate to put out information from one source. And it’s all on county letterhead so it looks like the county is saying it. But it could be the town of Duck or the town of Nags Head. So I’ve never thought about it ;til now, but speaking with one voice . . .
WJ: Directs all the attention to the county.
BO: But that’s necessary as well. Because people need to be able to come to one place.
MJ: Six or seven years ago we didn’t have a joint information center, isn’t that right?
DT: This was formed after Isabel because we had towns and departments issuing different stuff, and we came together and said, “We need this to be one-stop shopping.”
MJ: So it’s one voice, one place to find your information, and it’s saying the same thing. And it’s kind of state-of-the-art what she does.
Okay, mosquito spraying…
MJ: Oh, God.
People were questioning the aerial spraying and why didn’t we use larvicide…?
WJ: We did that.
DT: We were.
BO: We used larvicides, we used truck spraying and we used aerial spraying. The Center for Disease Control recommended we do the aerial spraying. They sent us a letter saying it was justified. The health department said there was a risk of disease. And the aerial spraying, we understand from the EPA is safe. So all those bases were covered. And I’ve used this example before: one doctor said, if you’d ever seen one case of encephalitis, you’d take the risk of aerial spraying. Some people didn’t like that; but I received lots more calls about “What are you gonna do about these mosquitoes?”
DT: 150 to one, probably.
MJ: And some of the rare “thank yous”, you get in government.
Because I did research the chemicals, and Naled does cause cancer risk in rats and other issues…
MJ: Watch the TV at night, Levitra causes blindness, diarrhea. . . .
BO: But the EPA said it was safe to use, too.
I don’t think they can legally say it’s safe. They can say the risk isn’t significant. But Naled does have the highest classification when it comes to toxicity of all the mosquito control pesticides. Either way, I think the concern was why spray at all when you can use larvicides. But you were using larvicides, as well?
BO: Well, you’re trying to do it in sequence where you kill them before they lay and you kill the larvae before they hatch. So when all your weather parameters line up just right, then you spray. But we used all the resources available and we brought in an entomologist and he told us what we needed to do and how we needed to do it and that’s what we did.
WJ: This wasn’t Bobby and Mike sitting in a smoke filled room.
MJ: The CDC isn’t going to tell us to spray 30,000 people with something that would hurt them. That ain’t what they do.
But then you think about what the government told people when they wanted to do nuclear testing [in Nevada], and it’s always “don’t worry, this is safe…”
MJ: Well, they told us: we could spray with chemicals, but we couldn’t drop any nuclear weapons on the mosquitoes. [laughs]
BO: But it’s an emergency management decision. Mosquito control is something in emergency management that other places do as well as part of the recovery . . .
MJ: Hyde County.
WJ: Currituck.
BO: . . .because it’ important for health reasons.
Every radio caller was told to take their issues the next meeting. Is it safe to say nobody’s made any public comments regarding beach reentry?
WJ: Not yet.
DT: I don’t think we’ve had any public comments at any commissioners’ meetings.
BO: We got tons of emails from visitors who were upset they couldn’t get on Hatteras Island. I say “tons,” it’s probably a couple hundred. We got a few from local people. But not what we got from the visitors.
WJ: And we got more locals that said “thank you” than criticized.
So what now: is it recovery mode? And what sort of time frame?
WJ: We’re in recovery. Absolutely we’re in recovery. And if any readers want to donate, ICO is the coordinating agency. And we have hundreds and hundreds of families from stumpy point to Kill Devil Hills to Avon, Rodanthe, Waves Salvo, Kitty Hawk village, Colington — they’re gonna need things. Many things. To put their households back together. It’s more than just brick and mortar. It’s contents.
BO: I met with FEMA today and they didn’t have a guess about time frame. As long as it takes is pretty much the answer.
WJ: Insurance money. FEMA grants for those who don’t have insurance. The people’s ability to fund whatever …recovery is subjective. So, depending on what each individual’s level of recovery, it’s gonna take a while. Infrastructure-wise the bridge is built, the road is open, the permanent solution is yet to come. But right now that’s done. In 37 days or whatever.
BO: In 60 days or so the debris will be picked up. And then it’s a matter of putting your life back together. Getting your house repaired, and that type of thing. And in the interim it’s how do we house those people and what do they do while they’re getting all that together?
Would you say this is worse than Isabel?
WJ: I don’t see how you compare them. It’s two types of damage. Isabel was an entirely different storm: it was oceanfront, the big destruction was there north of the village cutting it off, and we had some road problems in Rodanthe got fixed quickly. South Nags head took it’s beating. Third Street north every telephone pole was knocked down and there was a lot of flooding. But all that was ocean side; it was the business district. Certainly there are some residents in there, but you can’t compare ‘em. Because the insurance company comes down and writes you a check for 25,000 square feet of concrete, asphalt, wood shingles and says, “Here you go Mr. Businessman-or-woman,” and you rebuild. That’s not happening here; it’s your home. You look at those debris piles and it’s toys, it’s furniture, it’s pictures of the family, it’s clothes. To me there’s no comparison. And I don’t think you’d ever want to say one was worse than the other. For the folks trapped on Hatteras Village the day after Isabel, they had no road, they had no water, they had no power. It was probably gloomy those first couple of days. They got power back by Sunday but for three weeks they were walking down to town square to take a shower in a trailer. They were walking out back to drop a bucket in the creek to flush the toilet. So it’d be hard to convince those people anything was worse than that. But you walk through Colington or down Bay Drive or Stumpy point where a third of the houses are uninhabitable today and you’d be hard pressed to convince them anything was worse than Irene. It’s bad either way. It’s just different set of people were injured. A different set of people had hardship.
MJ: It’ll be a long winter. A long winter. But Bobby, Dorothy and myself, we traveled the 9th Ward I think a year after Katrina. Total devastation, nobody living there except may one house out of 300 on a block. And even today it’s like that. But those people in Rodanthe or Bay Drive or Mann’s harbor, they’ll be back. It wont’ be next week, but sometime. Just a tough bunch of people. A different bunch of people. And they take care of themselves. Whether the government or insurance company helps them to what level, they’ll find a way to fill the gap and make it happen. That is good.
ED NOTE: AT THIS POINT, THE CONVERSATION SEEMED AT AN END SO WE STOPPED RECORDING. THEN IT RESUMED AND WE STARTED AGAIN.–
And rumors spread like wildfire. When the school kerfuffle was going, I called a friend on the school board and said, “What’s up?” and he said: it’s totally untrue. People in Western NC make up many more snow days . . .
WJ: And what did the general assembly do this summer? They did two things: they extended the school year to 185 days; and secondly, they said you have to go every day.
MJ: There ain’t no exceptions.
WJ: And the superintendent told us: there’s no waiver to apply for anymore.
BO: So she has to get her 185 days in however she gets ‘em in. But again, rumors, the whole idea of having the joint information center that Dorothy does is that if everyone is putting out the same information, hopefully you eliminate a lot of the rumors. But you have ‘em anyway. We had people call me and say “I have so-and-so working on the bridge and he says it’s not going to be done til December.” And I’d say , “No I talked to them yesterday and they’re right on schedule.” So that’s what you deal with an and you just have to beat it down. And we know it’s out there, because we deal with it every day.
WJ: You just can’t deal with it fast enough.
BO: No, because you have to hear it before you can deal with it. and you say: Did you go to website? And they say, ‘no.’
How much of your job was rumor control?
B.O. We had a call around on the radio every evening at 5’o clock we checked in with the fire chiefs to see what was going on in the communities. What were the needs, what were the problems. Did this truck get there? Did that truck get there? And one of the things on the checklist was rumor control. Every day we asked: what are the rumors you’re hearing so we can get you the information and you can get it out the community so it’s not rumor anymore. Either true or not true. Irene Nolan at Island Free Press would email, “I heard this rumor” and I’d email back something for rumor control. Because it made our job so much more difficult.
WJ: And information is very powerful to people. And I know Mike feel the same way: we wish the people had called us. Some of the things you hear on the radio, it was like “Where do people hear that stuff?” Call us. I was in Avon at the first meeting and I wrote my number up on the board. call me. Don’t sit there and brood over a rumor that you hear.
Its’ the curse of a small town too.
WJ: And people are mad. They’re hurtin’.
BO: But we’re talking about a lot of negative. Those negative things we’re talking about are four or five things out of hundreds that are positive.
WJ: Let me tell you: a great story for you is what residents have done, neighbors helping neighbors. Volunteer firemen who lost their homes ,yet they worked 18 to 20 hours a day in other peoples homes, only to go back to a wet musty house because they didn’t have time to do theirs. There’s 100s of those stories compared to the 5 people who call you up and cuss you out over something. The ferry division. Yeah, we had some aches and pains over there, but you talk about 100 men and women around the clock the clock. Making 16 round trips a day, 24 hours a day. In storms…
BO: And staying over here in hotels. What we did in 35 dies with a ferry system and an island cut off is remarkable. If you’re over there suffering, you don’t think it’s so remarkable but..
MJ: Huge power restoration, phone restoration. Didn’t lose water. It’s huge.
WJ: Unbelievable. The phone contractors were down there. It wasn’t the transmission lines hat were difficult, it was that everyone needed a new phone line to their house. The distribution system.. .
BO: But they got over there. And they got prioritized on the ferry or over by helicopter, whatever had to be done to make all that happen. We had emergency medical services on the ground the next morning. Ready to go at full speed capacity as soon as the water receded enough they could get out of he driveways. Again, I could go on and on . We didn’t lose water for a minute down there. We sealed off all the towers, so if we had a break we wouldn’t lose it. And if we had a break we fixed it before we turned the water back on. Those people had water to bathe in and drink the day after the storm. The fire departments were remarkable, we didn’t have a fire loss. On and on.
WJ: Folks from Hatteras Village who had no damage came up — the owner of a realty company and his chief construction guy — split up into two crews and went to Rodanthe and Waves and just started cleaning out stuff to the street.
BO: We get caught up in the reentry, which is really an argument between two different factions of the business community when there’s hundreds of other things that go on that we do.
WJ: If you go to those four villages, three of them had no damage and the fourth the businesses district was fine. They were ready. And the grocery stores had shelves full , gas stations full. Restaurants were ready.
BO: That’s part of what you look for.
DT: I had a call from a woman saying, the grocery store’s not ready. And I said, I was down there myself and there was food in every store. The Food Lion in Avon was probably better stocked than the Food Lion up here..
BO: Well the Food Lion in Southern Shores didn’t have produce for a week. But it seems all the media inquiries are something where someone’s called and said, “We didn’t get enough blue tarps.” Or they didn’t like the reentry decision. No media has focused on building the bridge in 36 days. Or juggling the priorities or the ferry system . . .
WJ: How ‘bout the deputy sheriffs and highway patrol who had the overnight shift at the Bonner Bridge, or at Salvo or the Stumpy Point ferry dock in just mosquito infested conditions?
BO :. . .and while it was long lines, it was organized and orderly. You guys should focus on that.
Well, the purpose of this particular column is to pick a complex, contentious issue that not everybody likes. And the curse of politics is that people always call and complain; nobody calls and says, “Everything’s been going great the past month.”
MJ: We got three good emails. Bobby forwarded them to me. [everyone laughs]
WJ: But I’ll tell you this next storm, if you have a whole new set of faces in this room, you still got the same problems. You still have the same issue: when do you evacuate? When do you reopen? It’s bigger than Mike, Dorothy, Bobby and warren. It’s bigger than all the mayors.
MJ: It’s way bigger.
BO: We had hours in the storm when it was raging to sit there an do nothing but run scenarios. And I tried to write a reentry policy and you cant do it. By the time you write all the ‘what ifs’, the tree web gets so broad that . . .
MJ: You get to the end and you can’t see the trunk anymore.
BO: There’s so many variables that you can’t draw a policy. It’s situation-dependent.
DT: There’s no perfect plan.
BO: It’s what’s the situation? What roads are out? Do you have water? Do you have power? What are the negatives if you re-enter? What are the positive? And there’s no way to account for all the infinite possibilities that would influence the decision.
MJ: We think operational-wise that this was a good hurricane. We think a lot of good things happened in this hurricane. But you can’t say that, because someone might take it wrong. And it wasn’t a great hurricane at my house either. But I don’t remember ever looking at any TV coverage of any hurricane in America and seeing someone say, “This was a good hurricane; we handled it good.” Because you can’t.
BO: And we’ll do after action meetings to see how we can do better and change things. And hopefully we’re learning every time we do this. And the things we learn we’ll fix and make recovery better for the next time. So it’s a learning process.
______________________________________________________________________
ISSUE 0.1: TRIAL BY SAND?
The extended version our inaugural issue’s conversation with Nags Head Mayor Bob Oakes about beach nourishment.
On July 1, 2001 Mayor Bob Oakes sat down to discuss Nags Head’s beach nourishment project, which was only partially completed at the time. An edited version appeared in the Fall 2011 issue of Outer Banks Milepost. What follows is the complete interview. — Ed.
You gotta give Nags Head credit: they sure know how to fill a beach. Calculating a decade of sand loss — then dumping a 16-year supply of matching grain sizes. (Instead of using Oregon Inlet dredge spoil, which would race home ten times faster — and probably look 100 times worse.) They even got tourists to foot most of the bill by scoring $18 million from Dare County’s Shoreline Management fun. (Of course, that means Kill Devil Hills, Duck and others will be lining up next.) But for many residents the question isn’t how they did it — but why? Why gamble millions on an angry ocean with budgets so tight? Why try at all after the public voted “no”? Mayor Bob Oakes kindly agreed to sit down and offer some answers on how all this sand came to Nags Head. How long it stays? Well, even he admits that’s “entirely up to the ocean.”
MILEPOST: This is obviously a polarizing topic. Can you explain how we got here?
MAYOR BOB OAKES: Well let me start with the principles and the choices we felt like we had. There are three typical responses to erosion. One is the boardwalk and bulkhead things you see, more often up north. North Carolina ruled those out of bounds years ago. In the late 70s they passed the CAMA act and said we’re not going to harden the shoreline. And frankly, that’s to protect the neighbors. Because if one guy hardens, the guys on either side suffer tremendously. And that’s what we’ve seen with sandbags. The sandbag line stops, the beach has receded on the other side of it. So hardening the shoreline we didn’t think was the best thing to do.
Retreat is the other big option. And the bad thing about retreat is — well, for one we were losing tax base and losing infrastructure in water lines and roads. But the end result of retreat is you go away entirely. And I don’t think the town is ready to do that. So, if you’re going to draw a line in the sand, it seems reasonable to draw it out in front of your tax base and try to protect the tax base and the road at the same time because we wont let it get back to the road. So you’re left with that soft approach of beach nourishment where you’re not building structures where you affect the flow of sand and affect the neighbors. You’re just adding sand to that system.
So we’re in the process of putting down about 16 years worth of sand. We started measuring the sand loss on the beach back around 2004. And we had a previous survey from the late 90s that gave us a fixed point. So we know the average of what we’re losing annually over the past 10 years. We want the beach to last 10 yeas, so we’re putting 16 years worth of sand out. There’s about 100 million cubic yards in the borrow area offshore, so we’re using 4.6 million cubic yards of that. So we’re using really high quality sand. And we’re fortunate to have a good sand resource out here because Southern NC doesn’t have that sand resource. They’re pulling from inlets and that type of thing and offshore areas that don’t have the same sand repository. So they’ve gotten kind of a mixed bag. And it’s part disposal project and part beach nourishment. And somebody helps paying for the disposal part of it because they have to keep the inlets clear. We don’t have anybody paying for part of it, but we’ve got really good high quality sand and large grain sand. The grains on our sand are pretty good size. We core sampled out there, so we know what were looking at. We also core sampled out at Oregon inlet, and the sand at Oregon inlet is about ten times finer. And the problem with that is get up in that water column in suspension a whole lot easier. So it goes away a lot faster — our guy says 10 times faster. So we got the right sand. I think if you went out there you’d have a hard time telling the new beach from the old beach, which I was really thrilled about. And I’ve actually seen the critter holes, so I don’t’ think we’ve lost all of our critters either. We’ve also had two turtle nests recently, which is a pretty good year for us.
So that’s the gist of the principles: we had hardening here, retreat over here, and nourishment in the middle The worst case with nourishment is if the sand washes away, you’ve lost a lot of money.
And that’s one of the issues. And I’ll give you credit for following the Army Corps plan so closely. But the Army Corps doesn’t approve these projects unless they’re doing it for 50 years.
But the price tag on those 50-year terms is outrageous. And that was part of the issue. It’s a local project. When it became apparent that federal funding wasn’t forthcoming coming on the big project. And they were talking about — it started out at 65 million and went up over the years to 90 million. And somebody told me that’s 90% of what the core spends on the East Coast in a year. So there was no way we were gonna get all that money from the feds. And the federal project focused on putting a big dune behind it, this is more focused on building beach. And you can build a dune, but if the ocean’s brushing against your dune, it’s going away. You see that all the time during a storm. It’s like a hot knife through butter. Stabilized or not, if a wave hits the dune, it’s chopping away at the base of it. The idea of building the beach is it breaks up the force of the waves. So we think we’ve got reasonable protection. We have a lot of stuff that’s right on the edge. If you go down to Jennette’s and head south, the Comfort Inn . . .
You might say the Comfort Inn’s over the edge already . . .
[laughs] Yeah, they might be over the edge. But all those condos too. You have a lot of houses after Comfort Inn all sand bagged. And that’s probably three quarters of a mile of sand bags. They were basically in imminent anger. Another storm or two would’ve probably exposed those bags and probably brushed right past them. And those are all big structures. Very difficult to move. It’s not like a single family home where if you’ve got a place to move it back you can move it back. So, two things: we got the permit, which was six years of jumping through hoops. It’s just an incredibly long process. Finally getting that permit in December was a big go-ahead piece. Then we just had to figure out how to pay for it. And what we’ve done is put the vast majority of that paying for it on the occupancy tax. Nags Head’s very lucky that Dare County saw something coming and in 2002 they put 1% of that occupancy tax on the nourishment. Now, they were thinking of paying the local share on the federal project. But if there’s no federal share forthcoming, they said, “This is what’s it’s for.” So, they’re parting with 18 million out of that big fund that has around 30 million it. But it will take a couple years for anyone to be ready to do anything, just because of the permitting process. So, we’re getting 18 million. We’re covering 10 miles of beach. Nags Head contributed about 25% of that occupancy tax fund anyway.
So basically, everyone’s lining up. Nags Head goes first, then KDH says, “If it works, we’re next.” And Duck’s already looking . . .
Sure. But any sand to the north of me, I’ll take. [laughs] It’s coming right here. But KDH was two miles or so for $200 million. Their costs will probably come down, but we got this sand for $5.85 a cubic yard for the first 3 million. And $5.08 a cubic yard for the next 1.6 million. So a super deal. We’d priced it around $7 to $7.50. So we hit the timing just right. And these guys are probably the biggest dredgers in the US. So they’re the guys to do it. Summer time — the timing of the project — is difficult on occasion. Nobody wants their summer vacation with bulldozers and pipes out on the beach. The big reason for that was safety. The winter storms.
Well they won’t operate in sea heights over a certain limit anyway. Doesn’t that make you nervous? The one thing you see when people point to success stories around here — whether its’ VB or Southern NC, is that…
They’re not out in the middle of the ocean. We’re exposed.
We’re exposed. You’re saying 10 years, some people are saying we’ll be lucky to get 3 years. Is it basically, ‘trial by sand’ for lack of a better term.
There’s a little bit of that. You can do all the models in the world but it doesn’t tell you what the real world is going to do. But that’s the rationale we used: this is how much sand we’ve lost annually for the past 10 years, including Hurricane Isabel and a number of nor’easters. There’s no real reason why that number would increase to 500,000 cubic yards per year. So I think the science is reasonable behind it. A lot of times nourished beaches erode quicker than ‘virgin beaches’ for lack of a better term. But a lot of times that’s because of the incompatibility of the material. A smaller grain sand will go away faster. We shouldn’t have that problem. So it stands to reason we should have a similar erosion rate to what we’ve been experiencing over the past 10 years. So even if you bump it up to 300,000 cubic yards a year of loss, you still put enough sand out there for 15 years or so. But we’ll see. The plan is we measure it from here on out and see how much we’re losing.
How many people have you spoken with when making the decision. Dr. Pilkey says “No way.” Your guy says, “Yes, way.” And everyone tends to hear what they want to hear . . .
Well, the data is the data. You’re surveying the profile and you measure the amount of sand that’s been lost. Those are facts. Those aren’t opinions. The opinion part is “How long is it going to stay there?” Dr. Pilkey certainly has an opinion, but it’s not necessarily based on fact. Nobody’s got those facts here because we’ve never done it here. That’s one positive piece, is we will have the information — factual information — after this project and on the follow up to learn: does it go away faster, does it go away at this rate? So I think that’s very much a positive. I do think we try to be reasonably balanced. There are good parts to it and bad parts to it. Nothing is all good or all bad. And there are coastal engineers out there who think it does work it — obviously the army corps believes it will work. I think Dr. Conn was hired before I got on board, but he’s done projects reasonably nearby. Myrtle Beach, and we’re not saying this beach is Myrtle Beach. But then it’s not the same process either. Sandbridge was another one. Virginia doesn’t have the same hardened structure laws, so 10 years ago in Sandbridge at high tide your back was up against the bulkhead — if you had any beach. And they’ve renourished and it’s worked reasonably well for them. Two issues: is it going to work and is it going to be economical depends on how long that sand stays out there. If it stays out there for three years, yeah, I’m a dog. If it stays out for 15, everybody’s happy. I’ll be very surprised if we didn’t get six to seven years out of it; we’re paying for it over five. So, if its’ still out here after we’ve gotten paid for, I think that’ll be deemed a success.
But then it’ll be somebody else’s turn. And they’re going to need the same amount of funding. It will rotate.
Yep. Everyone talks about it’s not a one-time thing but we also don’t know how frequently we’ll need to renourish. The norm is 3 to 5 years. But those are projects where the fed picks up 75% and the state helps pay the rest, so those localities don’t have as much skin in the game. We do. And we tried to scale the project to keep it economically effective. But frankly, you do have to put it out there and see how long it stays. There’s no other way to model it.
The money issue is tough, too. It’s a weird time to take a $36 million dollar gamble. I’ve hard people say “We can’t get $1.3 million fro the schools, but we can put $36 million on the beach.” And I know they’re funded differently, but where there’s a will there’s. way. Why can’t we use occupancy tax to go toward that? Or to make something permanent at Windmill Point or . . ?
Well, the schools are a county issue so I probably need to shut up. But Dare County didn’t have these schools 40 years ago. And we wouldn’t have ‘em today if we didn’t have the tourism economy that’s based on the beach. What’s more important? To have a convention center at Windmill Point? Or to have the beach there for the next 10 to 15 years. I think if you go look where the beach has doubled in width out in front of the Surfside Hotel, to me there’s no comparison.
But what if in a year later it’s gone? Now’s not the time to make that comparison.
But again, I’m relatively sure, if you put out 16 years worth of sand, it’s not going to go away in a year. To me, all those funds — or the vast majority — are generated by the beach and tourism. This is a way of funding it that put very little burden on the local people because they don’t’ pay that occupancy tax. I tried to push our board not put even a portion of it on our west side local residents. But the board felt strongly everyone will benefit and everyone should pay some share. Right now it’s 16 cents in special tax district on everyone basically east of the beach road, because there’s a tremendous benefit there. And it’s obvious: my property value goes up because there’s double the beach in front of my house or hotel.
But the primary complaint I hear is people felt like they voted this down. And that got pushed through. Can you explain how that happened?
Sure. I’ve been elected three times and said the same thing in each election. And our last election was a year and a half ago. We had two candidates who were strongly anti-nourishment and two who were pro-nourishment. And the pro nourishment ones won. I don’t know” if you keep electing people who say this is the right thing to do, you shouldn’t be surprised when you get that.. If the majority felt like it was not the thing to do, they should’ve elected other people.
I guess you can be a one-issue candidate. But, on the other hand, if I support everything else you do that doesn’t leave me much of a choice. And I can see being at the poll going, “we voted nourishment down twice, they have to listen.”
Voted it down twice, where do you get that? The sales tax repeal which was all Dare County. And then the referendum in Nags Head, there were different costs involved. We didn’t have anything coming from occupancy tax. I think it was double the cost — we had 32 cents on the oceanfront instead of 18 — and I forget what the west side was but it was significant. And we had the whole town paying. This has just the oceanfront district and the occupancy tax – I take that back. That was the plan I presented. The board added the two cents on everybody. And to me that was a significant difference.
Still, in the peoples mind I think they feel “I voted no on nourishment.”
But you come to the point were you’ve got to do something, too. And it’s a representative democracy, not a pure democracy. And we have people on our board who’ve looked at it and studied it. And four out of five thought nourishment was the best way to go. And I’m the youngest in time served on that board. And all those other folks have been elected on a pro-nourishment platform.
If it doesn’t work, are you prepared to lose your job over it? You see the message boards say “Vote ‘em all out!.”
They’ll have that opportunity. They’ll have some of that opportunity in November. And I think it’s good that people do have the choice. But I think the choices they’ve made in the past have been for candidates who are for nourishment as the way to go. How you pay for it has always been the rub. If somebody else was paying for all of it, I don’t know if it would be an issue. We’ve got someone paying for a big portion of it, but we will all benefit from it. All of Dare County’s economy is based on that tourism piece. What pushed me over the edge on it on some fit, was some of the Sea Gulls stuff. Where you’ve got houses actually in the surf, septic tanks are behind the house broken up from the last storm. And that’s what you had to look forward to basically. If you kept up with the sand bags, that’s where we were going. A wall of sandbags all the way down south Nags Head. And to me, that’s not the vision we want to have. And we were close to approaching that.
On the other had, it is a migrating piece of beach. And we’ve gotten to the point where people should be aware of that. I had friends who just bought down there. And I told ‘em “You’re crazy.”
You let them do that?
I told them not to. So did their real estate agent. But they did. You know why? They saw the nourishment program coming. And I was like, “People have voted no twice.” And they said, “It’s gonna happen. ” And they bought it.
Well, it’s a gamble.
And they made it based on the belief hat this sand will be there as long as their house will be. But don’t they deserve to take that risk? And even the Nags ahead website says, if we get hit with a hurricane we “may be eligible for FEMA funding to replace sand lost during that storm.” Aren’t both examples of asking other people to support risky behavior? I mean, my wife and I bought our lot in the middle of island for a reason; and till know 50 years sea level rise may make my deck a dock.
South Nags Head has been the poster child for erosion since I’ve been down here. And, yeah, to a certain extent it’s bailing some of those guys out. We’ve also taken legal action to have some of them removed. So, it’s a huge gamble if [your friends] bought down there with the idea of that nourishment coming. Nobody even knew it was going to happen until mid-April of this year; and I was surprised that it happened this year. I wouldn’t have bet on it. I wouldn’t buy anything in South Nags Head. But once you start on that road of retreat, you’re going to keep losing tax base. And it’s going go from here to zero. And that’s the thing about the town. Your taxpayers a lot of times are thinking, “In five years I’m gonna leave and I don’t want to pay any more taxes than I have to.” The town has a different responsibility because it’s going to be there — hopefully – forever, to look farther down the road, not just five years – but the next 50. And the prospects for South Nags Head in the next 50 years are pretty grim. Like I said, if it doesn’t work, it’ll wash away and you’ll be back where you started. But do you just give up without trying nourishment? That was the point to me: shouldn’t we at least make the effort and see if it works or if it doesn’t. Because you can always retreat. And if this doesn’t ‘work, I’d imagine we will end up retreating.
The worst accusations you’ve probably heard is that it’s personal. Between Village Realty and having a house on the beach some have suggested it’s strictly self interest. How do you respond?
I mean, I’m in the very north section of the project. I’m doubling my taxes from $3000 to around $6000. I expect to recoup that in property value. But you don’t realize an increase in property value until you sell. And the house we’re in has been in my family since 1933. My wife’s grandfather built it. It’s been moved back twice, so we know there used to be a lot more beach than there is now. And there’s not a whole lot of room to move it back. But I’d like one of my kids to live there one day. And if you don’t do anything and it keeps moving back at two feet a year, eventually it catches you. But the reason we did the north end of the project is the relationship between length and longevity; if you make the project 10 miles instead of five miles, you should get four times the lifespan. So that’s the reasoning there. It stays in the system longer. And that north five miles is the anchor for the south five miles.
Because of the littoral current. Which brings us to the other main timing complaint: people see this sand just filling up the inlet at a time when dredge funds are low. We know you can’t take it from the inlet because the sand doesn’t match. But have you been taking a lot of flak for filing t up?
It’s got a ways to move down. You’re talking five miles to the inlet. But the littoral current’s going to move it that that way. But it’s not a straight shot. And that’s one reason we talk bout doing a terminal groin at the southern town line. I think that has possibilities. I don’t think we’ll ever get anything like that. The legislature approved a bill but it doesn’t seem to fit where we are.
Well, then you’re talking about robbing sand form further down the beach.
Well, Rodanthe is sand starved. But once you get past the inlet, you get into sort of a different system. And they don’t’ have a lot of sand down there. One of our fears was putting out too little sand. If you don’t put out enough it goes away faster and you don’t get any effect from it. So I think this is a large enough chunk of sand. The beach is a basically the equilibrium between the ocean and the land. And what we’re trying to do is reset that equilibrium so it’s a little bit farther out. And yeah, its’ going to erode as you come back. But you’re buying time.
So buying time. That’s what it is.
But the thing is that occupancy tax is generating a tremendous amount of money. Much more than $36 million a year. I think it was somewhere around $55 or so. And all the towns and Dare Co. benefit hugely from that. Nags Head, we’ve got a $12 to $12 million budget. And we get $2 million from those proceeds every year. So it‘s a significant revenue source.
Are you worried if it turns into a constant, VB type affair where there’s always pipes and filling that people will say, ‘I don’t go to the Outer Banks for this.’? What if it has the opposite effect and makes people go the other way?
Well, I think how it develops helps. We have single-family homes. Some may be big single-family homes, but they’re not hotels or condos or the high-density options you have in Virginia Beach or Myrtle Beach. But that’s how those places justify that federal money going into. It’s that economic benefit. And you can justify it better if you have a 10-story building you’re protection than a single-family house you’re protecting. And when I got here, retreat was the town policy. But the problem is people don’’ give up their houses very easily. And if you give them an option, like sandbags, they put the sandbags in and don’t really care about their neighbors. I’m saving my house, you put sandbags in and save your own. And there’s a point in that conflict between private home and the public beach where you’ve got to say, look, it’s the public’s beach. You may own down to the mean high water mark. But the public’s got the right to go through all those places. And they can’t go through ‘em if you septic or your sandbags are blocking the whole beach. “ And that’s where we ended up with Seagull and we’re still battling it out down there. And I do’ know how it’ll end. But I feel very strongly about how it should end: if those houses are in the surf six months out of the year, they’re not on private property anymore. And it’s a legal battle.
But w’ell see. I’d like to have some of that group come and look at our project and give it a critique. Tell us what we should do better. I’ve heard too many of the cheerleaders. I sued to be anti nourishment. I went to board meetings and said “this is dumb.” But part of that was what they were trying to sell. They had a guy come to a board of realtors meeting and say there’s a 1000 time benefit to spending that 80 million dollar. I couldn’t make those numbers work. I can make $36 million work if it’s coming from occupancy tax, just between retaining that tax base. And these oceanfront houses generate far more in tax revenue between sales tax and occupancy tax. If somebody’s renting a house for $5000 a week, they’re spending 5% in occupancy and 6.75% in sales tax. And a lot of that money comes back to Dare County and the towns. And the state. So l looked at it as an investment there to keep that income stream coming in. You make a special investment on the beach. And it keeps coming in for 15 years. If you retreat, income steam is going to go down. There’s just no way around it.
So what does Nags Head look in 50 years? How does it look north of the bridge? How much is nourishment? And how much sand is left?
I think if we wait five years and see what we’ve got then, we’ll have an awful lot more information about how long it stays and how it goes away. And any future decision we make we’ll be able to base on some actual performance. I think you’ll end up with somewhere between 10 and 15 years, ‘til it’s time to renourish again. My only concern is the permit taking six years to get. You’ve really got to start early. My board feels differently. They want to start putting money away for nourishment now. My point is you don’t know how much it’s gonna cost and when you’re going to do it. Let’s wait a bit and get some of that information.
My fear is if it’s still here in two years, KDH will rush to follow.
There ain’t no way to rush through the permit process, that’s the thing. I think the latest controversy is public access — with potential for sand being put on Duck’s beaches. Nags Head has wonderful beach access. We‘ve got more than all the towns combined — maybe even the most of any town in North Carolina. But Duck doesn’t have that. Same goes for Southern Shores. I don’t think everybody should be held to the federal standard, because federal funding not being used. And we don’t’ meet that. If you want public sand on the beach, the public should be able to get to it.
What about the environmental impacts?
I think we’ve been very fortunate. There’s not a lot of organic material in it. You don’t see plumes – the water’s clear a s bell right now. You see sand stirred up where there’s pumping but it’s not an environmental calamity. The quality of the sand is great. The benthic organisms is probably the biggest concern, and walking along the new beach, I saw holes indicating those little calms. So I feel like we’ve done a good job. And all the scientific literature I’ve read says the benthic organisms rebound in a year or two years. And I think we’re taking those organisms offshore and they’re are surviving the trip to the beach. The seagulls are sure feasting well [laughs]. They’re sitting there at the end of ht pipe. So they’ll pick out whatever things are coming out. But a lot that is making it. I think the sand fiddlers move up into the dunes like they do in a storm. All this is such a dynamic area. We can’t move the sand as fast as the ocean can. As people like to tell me [laughs]. Mother nature is still in charge. And she is. All we’re doing is setting that equilibrium part out farther out in the water than where it was. And yeah, it takes a huge amount of money and a huge amount of sand, and we’ll see how long it stays there. But it is entirely up to the ocean. And I do understand that part.